正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐣𝐢 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐚 𝐁𝐨𝐬𝐞 — 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐚 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲. From walking away from an elite authority to challenging the dominant political thinking of his time, Netaji represented a strain of nationalism that made the establishment uneasy. His clashes with Mahatma Gandhi, his democratic mandate within... the Congress, and his eventual break from its leadership changed the course of his journey — and how history treated him. What followed was decades of silence, omissions, and unanswered questions, only confronted much later under Narendra Modi. This isn’t nostalgia. It’s about who gets remembered, who gets erased, and why! 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐣𝐢 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐚 𝐁𝐨𝐬𝐞, 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬, 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐦𝐞.show more

BJP

23,043,276 subscribers

20,097 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

There is no more any speculation Indians are acutely aware of the large scale voter fraud happening under the Modi govt. Indians finally know of fake votes, multiple voter ids, fake addresses, hundreds of people registered in tiny one-room houses thanks only and only to Rahul Gandhi who brought it all to light. He exposed the unholy nexus between Modi and ECI with proof. He started asking direct, pointed questions to the Election Commission and demanded data, which has been denied. Meanwhile the ECI has been deleting and adding lakhs of voters in state after state at will - undermining our electoral democracy. The issue now stands undeniable. Yet instead of answers, Rahul Gandhi is being attacked - nonstop ugly personal attacks, media trials - to discredit him and drown his voice of truth and somehow desperately take the attention away from the blatant vote theft. Have you wondered - that if his allegations were baseless, why the panic? Why the coordinated senseless attack? They’re terrified of the questions he’s forcing India to ask about the integrity of our elections - questions that affect every single vote you cast. So if you have become party to the witch hunt against him, unknowingly perhaps - step away. Because when they try to drown his voice, remember - they’re actually drowning yours. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢 - 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮! 𝐇𝐞’𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐲. Demand answers. Because Vote Chori isn’t a Congress or BJP issue. It’s an India issue. It’s your issue.

There is no more any speculation Indians are acutely aware of the large scale voter fraud happening under the Modi govt. Indians finally know of fake votes, multiple voter ids, fake addresses, hundreds of people registered in tiny one-room houses thanks only and only to Rahul Gandhi who brought it all to light. He exposed the unholy nexus between Modi and ECI with proof. He started asking direct, pointed questions to the Election Commission and demanded data, which has been denied. Meanwhile the ECI has been deleting and adding lakhs of voters in state after state at will - undermining our electoral democracy. The issue now stands undeniable. Yet instead of answers, Rahul Gandhi is being attacked - nonstop ugly personal attacks, media trials - to discredit him and drown his voice of truth and somehow desperately take the attention away from the blatant vote theft. Have you wondered - that if his allegations were baseless, why the panic? Why the coordinated senseless attack? They’re terrified of the questions he’s forcing India to ask about the integrity of our elections - questions that affect every single vote you cast. So if you have become party to the witch hunt against him, unknowingly perhaps - step away. Because when they try to drown his voice, remember - they’re actually drowning yours. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢 - 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮! 𝐇𝐞’𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐲. Demand answers. Because Vote Chori isn’t a Congress or BJP issue. It’s an India issue. It’s your issue.

Supriya Shrinate

195,083 次观看 • 9 个月前

𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐫𝐚 𝐨𝐟 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬 With social media filled with self-proclaimed millionaires and successful traders, Kene has shared what he believes is one of the simplest ways to tell if someone has actually made serious money from trading. According to Kene, a trader who has genuinely made good money will naturally develop the desire to explore the world. He explained that it doesn’t necessarily mean going on extravagant or luxurious trips. Sometimes, it could simply be the desire to visit another country, experience a different culture, or see how life operates outside your immediate environment. “Even if it’s Ghana, you would want to go,” was the point he made — emphasizing that genuine financial freedom often comes with a broader curiosity about the world. Kene also argued that traders who remain trapped in a strictly Nigerian mindset may limit how far they can go. In his view, if you’re constantly thinking only with Nigerian ideas and perspectives, you may struggle to see the bigger opportunities available globally. For Kene, making money is only one part of the journey. The real transformation comes when your experiences, exposure, and ambitions begin to expand alongside your finances. Because sometimes, the biggest proof that money has changed you isn’t the car you buy — it’s the world you suddenly want to see. 🌍📈

𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐫𝐚 𝐨𝐟 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬 With social media filled with self-proclaimed millionaires and successful traders, Kene has shared what he believes is one of the simplest ways to tell if someone has actually made serious money from trading. According to Kene, a trader who has genuinely made good money will naturally develop the desire to explore the world. He explained that it doesn’t necessarily mean going on extravagant or luxurious trips. Sometimes, it could simply be the desire to visit another country, experience a different culture, or see how life operates outside your immediate environment. “Even if it’s Ghana, you would want to go,” was the point he made — emphasizing that genuine financial freedom often comes with a broader curiosity about the world. Kene also argued that traders who remain trapped in a strictly Nigerian mindset may limit how far they can go. In his view, if you’re constantly thinking only with Nigerian ideas and perspectives, you may struggle to see the bigger opportunities available globally. For Kene, making money is only one part of the journey. The real transformation comes when your experiences, exposure, and ambitions begin to expand alongside your finances. Because sometimes, the biggest proof that money has changed you isn’t the car you buy — it’s the world you suddenly want to see. 🌍📈

Biggest Blogger

38,517 次观看 • 10 天前

Prime Minister Narendra Modi did more than to expose the vanity of Rahul Gandhi at the Republic Summit 2026. He exposed the central fraud of Rahul Gandhi’s politics: 👉Memory must begin only after 2014. 👉Accountability must apply only to Modi. 👉Institutions are legitimate only under Congress party. 👉Elections are democratic only when Congress wins. 👉And the Constitution is sacred only when it can be weaponised against the BJP. Rahul offers theatrical props, recycled allegations and the confidence of a man permanently protected from the consequences of his own incompetence. The greatest irony is that even Congress now demands that Modi fix everything. Every complaint ends with “Modi must act”, because somewhere beneath all the abuse lies an involuntary confession: they know who possesses the ability to deliver. Rahul Gandhi may keep waving the Constitution. But Narendra Modi has repeatedly forced him to confront something far more uncomfortable: The Indian voter can distinguish between carrying a book and carrying the responsibility of a nation. There is another irony Rahul Gandhi may want to consider. Britain, the former colonial ruler of India whose political and intellectual approval Rahul's ecosystem still appears to crave, has changed 6 Prime Ministers over the last 7 years. India has instead produced political continuity, democratic stability and a leader whose mandate has endured through relentless scrutiny. History has turned. And Narendra Modi carries the confidence of a civilisation that no longer looks to London or anywhere - or to the Gandhi family - for permission to lead. Republic

Prime Minister Narendra Modi did more than to expose the vanity of Rahul Gandhi at the Republic Summit 2026. He exposed the central fraud of Rahul Gandhi’s politics: 👉Memory must begin only after 2014. 👉Accountability must apply only to Modi. 👉Institutions are legitimate only under Congress party. 👉Elections are democratic only when Congress wins. 👉And the Constitution is sacred only when it can be weaponised against the BJP. Rahul offers theatrical props, recycled allegations and the confidence of a man permanently protected from the consequences of his own incompetence. The greatest irony is that even Congress now demands that Modi fix everything. Every complaint ends with “Modi must act”, because somewhere beneath all the abuse lies an involuntary confession: they know who possesses the ability to deliver. Rahul Gandhi may keep waving the Constitution. But Narendra Modi has repeatedly forced him to confront something far more uncomfortable: The Indian voter can distinguish between carrying a book and carrying the responsibility of a nation. There is another irony Rahul Gandhi may want to consider. Britain, the former colonial ruler of India whose political and intellectual approval Rahul's ecosystem still appears to crave, has changed 6 Prime Ministers over the last 7 years. India has instead produced political continuity, democratic stability and a leader whose mandate has endured through relentless scrutiny. History has turned. And Narendra Modi carries the confidence of a civilisation that no longer looks to London or anywhere - or to the Gandhi family - for permission to lead. Republic

Mahesh Jethmalani

33,389 次观看 • 2 个月前

The corruption happening in Florida should be a national scandal: A Florida grand jury found Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and his administration took $10 million from a Medicaid settlement that was supposed to help poor children get health care and diverted it to a charity run by his wife. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐒𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐬’ 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐬. Here’s where it gets even murkier. Despite the fact that the Grand Jury discovered this blatant corruption they decided against charging anyone because they said no one from DeSantis’ administration would take responsibility for sending the money to the charity or had any memory of who did it. The Grand Jury report states: “While we can't prove who is responsible, we can plainly see that taxpayer money was misused for political purposes and we would like to see changes made to prevent this from happening again." 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐉𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐃𝐞𝐒𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐬, 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐟𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐭. The reason we live under the most corrupt government on earth is politicians are never held accountable for their crimes, corruption, and selling the American people out at every turn.

The corruption happening in Florida should be a national scandal: A Florida grand jury found Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and his administration took $10 million from a Medicaid settlement that was supposed to help poor children get health care and diverted it to a charity run by his wife. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐒𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐬’ 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐬. Here’s where it gets even murkier. Despite the fact that the Grand Jury discovered this blatant corruption they decided against charging anyone because they said no one from DeSantis’ administration would take responsibility for sending the money to the charity or had any memory of who did it. The Grand Jury report states: “While we can't prove who is responsible, we can plainly see that taxpayer money was misused for political purposes and we would like to see changes made to prevent this from happening again." 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐉𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐃𝐞𝐒𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐬, 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐟𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐭. The reason we live under the most corrupt government on earth is politicians are never held accountable for their crimes, corruption, and selling the American people out at every turn.

Power to the People ☭🕊

190,577 次观看 • 5 天前

𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐍 𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐅𝐑𝐀𝐔𝐃𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐑 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐒 — 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐈𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐀 𝟓𝟒-𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐔𝐓𝐄 𝐓𝐀𝐏𝐄 “𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘬𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. 𝘐'𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐'𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘵 𝘌𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰'𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” Those words belong to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, spoken December 11, 2021 at a meeting in his official state capitol office. Sitting across from him: the organizers of the Feeding Our Future child nutrition program, who were running what became the largest pandemic fraud in American history. They had come to ask the state's top law enforcement officer to get investigators off their backs. 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝟓𝟒-𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐄𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝. He called the state investigation “𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥, 𝘱𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘧𝘧.” He told the fraudsters, “𝘐'𝘮 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱.” And then he asked for names. The fraud Ellison was asked to protect ran to $250 million — stolen from a federal child nutrition program designed to feed low-income kids during COVID. 𝐀𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐜𝐤, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝, 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝟒𝟏 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧. Sixty-nine others were charged. Minnesota's total pandemic fraud exposure: $9 billion. The tape was obtained by the Center of the American Experiment and played at two congressional hearings. In February 2026, Sen. Josh Hawley read the key exchange into the Senate Homeland Security Committee record and told Ellison: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘫𝘢𝘪𝘭.” In March, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer confronted him at House Oversight, warning that if the allegations proved true, Ellison should be “𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘢𝘪𝘭.” Ellison denies misusing his office. He says the fraudsters deceived him about the purpose of the meeting and that he rejected their offer to donate to his reelection campaign. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝟓𝟒 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟒𝟒 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠. 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝.

𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐍 𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐅𝐑𝐀𝐔𝐃𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐑 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐒 — 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐈𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐀 𝟓𝟒-𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐔𝐓𝐄 𝐓𝐀𝐏𝐄 “𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘬𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. 𝘐'𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐'𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘵 𝘌𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰'𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” Those words belong to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, spoken December 11, 2021 at a meeting in his official state capitol office. Sitting across from him: the organizers of the Feeding Our Future child nutrition program, who were running what became the largest pandemic fraud in American history. They had come to ask the state's top law enforcement officer to get investigators off their backs. 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝟓𝟒-𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐄𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝. He called the state investigation “𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥, 𝘱𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘧𝘧.” He told the fraudsters, “𝘐'𝘮 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱.” And then he asked for names. The fraud Ellison was asked to protect ran to $250 million — stolen from a federal child nutrition program designed to feed low-income kids during COVID. 𝐀𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐜𝐤, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝, 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝟒𝟏 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧. Sixty-nine others were charged. Minnesota's total pandemic fraud exposure: $9 billion. The tape was obtained by the Center of the American Experiment and played at two congressional hearings. In February 2026, Sen. Josh Hawley read the key exchange into the Senate Homeland Security Committee record and told Ellison: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘫𝘢𝘪𝘭.” In March, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer confronted him at House Oversight, warning that if the allegations proved true, Ellison should be “𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘢𝘪𝘭.” Ellison denies misusing his office. He says the fraudsters deceived him about the purpose of the meeting and that he rejected their offer to donate to his reelection campaign. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝟓𝟒 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟒𝟒 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠. 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝.

M.A. Rothman

53,044 次观看 • 2 个月前

𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐑 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐅𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄!! 𝐈 𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐃 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐏 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐄!! 𝐏𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐄 𝐃𝐎 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐈𝐂 𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐀𝐋𝐖𝐀𝐘𝐒 𝐃𝐎!! 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟖𝐭𝐡? 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝... #Swachhagrahis On November 8, 2014, a sight on the #Assighat in #Kashi left a lasting impact on our nation’s conscience. Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji, spade in hand, began clearing a mound of hardened silt alongside sanitation workers, not from a podium or raised stage, but in the trenches, shoulder to shoulder. The scene was clear: this wasn’t symbolic. It was a real act, and it spoke volumes. He didn’t just talk about change; he exemplified it. He showed us, through action, that '𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲.' In his own words from the Red Fort, he asked each of us to “𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐟 ‘𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐞?’ 𝐚𝐧𝐝 ‘𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐈 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫?" His question resonates as strongly today:“Has your action safeguarded the interests of the country or not? Has it worked for the welfare of others?” PM Modi’s actions inspired a wave of change, setting off a transformation from dirt-ridden banks to bustling, clean spaces that today attract countless visitors to #Assighat. November 8th reminds us to honor the legacy of Swachhagrahis - those frontline warriors of cleanliness, who stood between us and the COVID pandemic, and continue to work tirelessly each day. Let’s make this a day where our respect for them isn’t only expressed but truly felt. 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐛𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭:: 1. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 - the ones who keep your streets, public spaces, and homes clean. Learn their names, get to know them as individuals, and remember that our PM himself has shown respect by washing their feet, honoring their invaluable work. 2. 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐥𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐨. This act will spread a message of respect, inspiring communities to see their contributions with fresh, appreciative eyes. 3. 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 - whether in a restaurant or their home, and treat it as you would a family gathering. This simple gesture of kindness reinforces that they are part of the larger family of our nation. 4. 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 in your community, with a heartfelt *thank you* message. Allow your neighbors to write their appreciation and recognize their efforts visibly and proudly. These are only a few ideas — but whatever you choose, 𝐝𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝. These unsung heroes don’t ask for acknowledgment; they don’t demand praise. But it is "our duty" to extend it. Let’s honor their work and recognize the sacrifices they make every day. November 8th is a day to give back the dignity and pride our #Swachhagrahis deserve. Let’s make this a collective movement.

𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐑 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐅𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄!! 𝐈 𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐃 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐏 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐄!! 𝐏𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐄 𝐃𝐎 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐈𝐂 𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐀𝐋𝐖𝐀𝐘𝐒 𝐃𝐎!! 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟖𝐭𝐡? 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝... #Swachhagrahis On November 8, 2014, a sight on the #Assighat in #Kashi left a lasting impact on our nation’s conscience. Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji, spade in hand, began clearing a mound of hardened silt alongside sanitation workers, not from a podium or raised stage, but in the trenches, shoulder to shoulder. The scene was clear: this wasn’t symbolic. It was a real act, and it spoke volumes. He didn’t just talk about change; he exemplified it. He showed us, through action, that '𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲.' In his own words from the Red Fort, he asked each of us to “𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐟 ‘𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐞?’ 𝐚𝐧𝐝 ‘𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐈 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫?" His question resonates as strongly today:“Has your action safeguarded the interests of the country or not? Has it worked for the welfare of others?” PM Modi’s actions inspired a wave of change, setting off a transformation from dirt-ridden banks to bustling, clean spaces that today attract countless visitors to #Assighat. November 8th reminds us to honor the legacy of Swachhagrahis - those frontline warriors of cleanliness, who stood between us and the COVID pandemic, and continue to work tirelessly each day. Let’s make this a day where our respect for them isn’t only expressed but truly felt. 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐛𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭:: 1. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 - the ones who keep your streets, public spaces, and homes clean. Learn their names, get to know them as individuals, and remember that our PM himself has shown respect by washing their feet, honoring their invaluable work. 2. 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐥𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐨. This act will spread a message of respect, inspiring communities to see their contributions with fresh, appreciative eyes. 3. 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 - whether in a restaurant or their home, and treat it as you would a family gathering. This simple gesture of kindness reinforces that they are part of the larger family of our nation. 4. 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 in your community, with a heartfelt thank you message. Allow your neighbors to write their appreciation and recognize their efforts visibly and proudly. These are only a few ideas — but whatever you choose, 𝐝𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝. These unsung heroes don’t ask for acknowledgment; they don’t demand praise. But it is "our duty" to extend it. Let’s honor their work and recognize the sacrifices they make every day. November 8th is a day to give back the dignity and pride our #Swachhagrahis deserve. Let’s make this a collective movement.

Temsutula Imsong #SwachhagrahiSammanDiwas #08th

51,622 次观看 • 1 年前

𝐀 𝐌𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐎 𝐀 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐋 𝐌𝐄𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐋𝐈𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐋𝐎𝐔𝐃 It went viral as an “𝘶𝘯𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘵𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯” Then it clicked. This man must be a satirist (I hope), and he is operating at the very top of his craft. He steps to the podium and opens with “𝘐𝘯 2015, 𝘉𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱” From there it is a firehose of every talking point you have ever heard, delivered with a completely straight face. He mourns his “𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘨𝘢𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘹-𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳-𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘸” who, he explains, wanted only one thing for his birthday: the COVID vaccine, “𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺” That was the tell. 𝐒𝐢𝐱-𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫-𝐨𝐥𝐝. 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐠𝐚𝐲. 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫. 𝐀𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐯𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭. You cannot write a sharper parody of the worldview than that. Then he builds his case that Trump is worse than Hitler. His reasons: Trump “𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴” and Hitler does not. Hitler at least made people wear masks. And Hitler, he says, had the “𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺” to leave everyone alone. He closes with his hero, 𝐊𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐬 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐰𝐚𝐛, quoting the line back word for word: “𝘣𝘺 2030 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘺” “𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘩𝘪𝘮, 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘐 𝘢𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘩” The best part is the room. The council members keep glancing at each other — is this real? Is this actually happening? 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥. And that is the genius of it. Great satire works because it does not exaggerate. It just repeats the real thing, in order, with a straight face, until the absurdity speaks for itself. He did not invent a single one of these lines. He just stacked them. 𝐈𝐟 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐥𝐞𝐟𝐭, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞. 𝐀+.

𝐀 𝐌𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐎 𝐀 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐋 𝐌𝐄𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐋𝐈𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐋𝐎𝐔𝐃 It went viral as an “𝘶𝘯𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘵𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯” Then it clicked. This man must be a satirist (I hope), and he is operating at the very top of his craft. He steps to the podium and opens with “𝘐𝘯 2015, 𝘉𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱” From there it is a firehose of every talking point you have ever heard, delivered with a completely straight face. He mourns his “𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘨𝘢𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘹-𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳-𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘸” who, he explains, wanted only one thing for his birthday: the COVID vaccine, “𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺” That was the tell. 𝐒𝐢𝐱-𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫-𝐨𝐥𝐝. 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐠𝐚𝐲. 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫. 𝐀𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐯𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭. You cannot write a sharper parody of the worldview than that. Then he builds his case that Trump is worse than Hitler. His reasons: Trump “𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴” and Hitler does not. Hitler at least made people wear masks. And Hitler, he says, had the “𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺” to leave everyone alone. He closes with his hero, 𝐊𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐬 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐰𝐚𝐛, quoting the line back word for word: “𝘣𝘺 2030 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘺” “𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘩𝘪𝘮, 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘐 𝘢𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘩” The best part is the room. The council members keep glancing at each other — is this real? Is this actually happening? 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥. And that is the genius of it. Great satire works because it does not exaggerate. It just repeats the real thing, in order, with a straight face, until the absurdity speaks for itself. He did not invent a single one of these lines. He just stacked them. 𝐈𝐟 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐥𝐞𝐟𝐭, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞. 𝐀+.

M.A. Rothman

18,863 次观看 • 2 个月前

Since I’m already here in the Outro: Tear hole and have been for about 12 hours now. I may as well use this opportunity to point out one of the very distinct reasons Outro: Tear evokes such visceral reactions from all us who hear it. The meaning behind it is defintely one of the reasons. But another is the structure of the song itself. Outro: Tear is not one song with 3 verses saying the same thing. It’s 3 different reactions changing hands as the song moves from Namjoon to Yoongi to Hoseok. And along with the lyrics, the melody is doing the same thing. It’s weaving from Namjoon’s conflict to Yoongi’s despair to Hoseok’s fear. It’s 3 different reactions in response to the same inevitable end. Namjoon’s reaction being internal interrogation of his self. His relationship with identity has always been threaded through questions of sincerity. Kim Namjoon vs RM. Leader vs person. The person carrying everybody versus the person who is also exhausted and frightened and occasionally has absolutely no idea what he’s doing. It’s inward conflict. Was it real? Was the goodbye always inevitable because of his own insincerity him? Then yoongi comes in with his verse that says, fine. Destroy it. His reaction is pure rage. And it’s not rage at the people who are important to him. No. It’s rage at the fact it has come to this. So he wants it all scorched. Bc if all of it has to go, then he wants it gone completely. No lingering. No halves. No hope. And then Hoseok’s verse. His whole verse is grappling with fear through his words. But it’s also fear as a physiological language. It’s one of the truly unique things about his verse. How the melody literally starts with hard breaths. You can hear it in the song. Gasping. Forcing. Almost choking. And then his flow breaks out of its contained rhythm. He’s panicking. He’s fearful bc “ending” was always just a concept. But now it’s here in present time. He spends the final verse driving his body and the song towards a state that feels increasingly unsustainable. The breaths are shorter, his delivery gets more frantic, rhythm breaking out of confinement, and then his repetitions like geol geol geol and byeong byeong byeong lose structure within the song and becomes a fixation almost. So now you as the listener who has been experiencing that transition from conflict to rage and despair and now to fear and panic, you are naturally expecting a sort of resolve. But it doesn’t happen. What does happen is the song quite literally cuts. The composition of the flow itself finally does what it’s meant to do. It ends without allowing for a resolve. That part. That abrupt end. That is why Outro: Tear has that reaction on us all. Because the very last thing you experience with the song is an interruption. All of that confusion and pain and rage and fear carries with you into Hoseok’s verse where as the panic crescendos, you expect him to arrive emotionally somewhere. But he doesn’t. He is still inside the panic when the song takes him away from you. So now you’re the one left holding all of that with you. That’s what’s almost cruel about the song itself. There’s no completion. Hoseok’s verse just escalates and escalates and then cuts. That’s it. You don’t get closure. You don’t get the emotional luxury of watching the pain taper away. The songs just rips from you.

Since I’m already here in the Outro: Tear hole and have been for about 12 hours now. I may as well use this opportunity to point out one of the very distinct reasons Outro: Tear evokes such visceral reactions from all us who hear it. The meaning behind it is defintely one of the reasons. But another is the structure of the song itself. Outro: Tear is not one song with 3 verses saying the same thing. It’s 3 different reactions changing hands as the song moves from Namjoon to Yoongi to Hoseok. And along with the lyrics, the melody is doing the same thing. It’s weaving from Namjoon’s conflict to Yoongi’s despair to Hoseok’s fear. It’s 3 different reactions in response to the same inevitable end. Namjoon’s reaction being internal interrogation of his self. His relationship with identity has always been threaded through questions of sincerity. Kim Namjoon vs RM. Leader vs person. The person carrying everybody versus the person who is also exhausted and frightened and occasionally has absolutely no idea what he’s doing. It’s inward conflict. Was it real? Was the goodbye always inevitable because of his own insincerity him? Then yoongi comes in with his verse that says, fine. Destroy it. His reaction is pure rage. And it’s not rage at the people who are important to him. No. It’s rage at the fact it has come to this. So he wants it all scorched. Bc if all of it has to go, then he wants it gone completely. No lingering. No halves. No hope. And then Hoseok’s verse. His whole verse is grappling with fear through his words. But it’s also fear as a physiological language. It’s one of the truly unique things about his verse. How the melody literally starts with hard breaths. You can hear it in the song. Gasping. Forcing. Almost choking. And then his flow breaks out of its contained rhythm. He’s panicking. He’s fearful bc “ending” was always just a concept. But now it’s here in present time. He spends the final verse driving his body and the song towards a state that feels increasingly unsustainable. The breaths are shorter, his delivery gets more frantic, rhythm breaking out of confinement, and then his repetitions like geol geol geol and byeong byeong byeong lose structure within the song and becomes a fixation almost. So now you as the listener who has been experiencing that transition from conflict to rage and despair and now to fear and panic, you are naturally expecting a sort of resolve. But it doesn’t happen. What does happen is the song quite literally cuts. The composition of the flow itself finally does what it’s meant to do. It ends without allowing for a resolve. That part. That abrupt end. That is why Outro: Tear has that reaction on us all. Because the very last thing you experience with the song is an interruption. All of that confusion and pain and rage and fear carries with you into Hoseok’s verse where as the panic crescendos, you expect him to arrive emotionally somewhere. But he doesn’t. He is still inside the panic when the song takes him away from you. So now you’re the one left holding all of that with you. That’s what’s almost cruel about the song itself. There’s no completion. Hoseok’s verse just escalates and escalates and then cuts. That’s it. You don’t get closure. You don’t get the emotional luxury of watching the pain taper away. The songs just rips from you.

Livheartt⁷ met hobi | ㉧㉣㉣ | 🦢🤍

57,637 次观看 • 10 天前

It is inevitable that such a monumental figure (Pt. Nehru) will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times, the challenges he had to face, and to look at him devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean, and defame him. The sole objective of this is not only to diminish him as a personality and undermine his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his leadership in the early decades of an independent nation grappling with unprecedented problems, but also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote, and what he did is quite another — and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

It is inevitable that such a monumental figure (Pt. Nehru) will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times, the challenges he had to face, and to look at him devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean, and defame him. The sole objective of this is not only to diminish him as a personality and undermine his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his leadership in the early decades of an independent nation grappling with unprecedented problems, but also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote, and what he did is quite another — and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

Congress

11,248 次观看 • 9 个月前

Terry Crews is not a pedophile, but another victim of sexual assault at the hands of powerful hollywood figures. Terry Crews was sexually assaulted by a Hollywood Executive at a function on 2016. An unnamed male executive grabbed his genitals in front of his wife and grinned like a jerk at their shocked response. The assault lasted only minutes, but what he was effectively telling Crews while he held his genitals in his hand was that he held the power. That he was in control. He said that he was tempted to retaliate, but was worried how the incident would be reported and feared he would go to jail. He thought, 240 lbs Black Man stomps out Hollywood Honcho would be the headline the next day if he did. When Crews told his story, the social media monster started to rear its ugly head. “Why didn’t he fight back against his assailant?” “What else are his muscles useful for?” “A man, a victim of sexual assault? How hilarious!” Not only from members of the public, but from other big name stars. Rapper 50 cent proceeded to mock Crews experience with a tiring meme on Instagram. Crews said the executive later called to apologise, but did not give a reason for his actions. Crews chose not to publicise the incident for fear of being ridiculed, which is par for the course when the predator has power and influence. Terry said his experience had helped him understand and empathize with those who have remained silent, but Harvey Weinstein is not the only perpetrator. Crews also expressed hope that, by making his experience public, he would deter a predator and encourage someone who feels hopeless. He spoke more on why he didn't do anything at the time. He stated, as a black man in America, you only have a few shots at success, you only have a few chances to make yourself a viable member of the community. Crews is from Flint, Michigan who had seen many young black men who were provoked into violence and they were in prison or they were killed. As he shared his story, he was told over and over that this was not abuse. This was just a joke or just horseplay. One man’s horseplay is another man’s humiliation and he chose to tell his story and share his experience to stand in solidarity with millions of other survivors around the world. Crews even made a series of tweets about what happened in 2017 in a 9 part series of posts. Growing up, Terry Crews watched his father violently abuse his mother using power and authority to dominate her. As he grew up, this thought transformed the type of man he became.

Terry Crews is not a pedophile, but another victim of sexual assault at the hands of powerful hollywood figures. Terry Crews was sexually assaulted by a Hollywood Executive at a function on 2016. An unnamed male executive grabbed his genitals in front of his wife and grinned like a jerk at their shocked response. The assault lasted only minutes, but what he was effectively telling Crews while he held his genitals in his hand was that he held the power. That he was in control. He said that he was tempted to retaliate, but was worried how the incident would be reported and feared he would go to jail. He thought, 240 lbs Black Man stomps out Hollywood Honcho would be the headline the next day if he did. When Crews told his story, the social media monster started to rear its ugly head. “Why didn’t he fight back against his assailant?” “What else are his muscles useful for?” “A man, a victim of sexual assault? How hilarious!” Not only from members of the public, but from other big name stars. Rapper 50 cent proceeded to mock Crews experience with a tiring meme on Instagram. Crews said the executive later called to apologise, but did not give a reason for his actions. Crews chose not to publicise the incident for fear of being ridiculed, which is par for the course when the predator has power and influence. Terry said his experience had helped him understand and empathize with those who have remained silent, but Harvey Weinstein is not the only perpetrator. Crews also expressed hope that, by making his experience public, he would deter a predator and encourage someone who feels hopeless. He spoke more on why he didn't do anything at the time. He stated, as a black man in America, you only have a few shots at success, you only have a few chances to make yourself a viable member of the community. Crews is from Flint, Michigan who had seen many young black men who were provoked into violence and they were in prison or they were killed. As he shared his story, he was told over and over that this was not abuse. This was just a joke or just horseplay. One man’s horseplay is another man’s humiliation and he chose to tell his story and share his experience to stand in solidarity with millions of other survivors around the world. Crews even made a series of tweets about what happened in 2017 in a 9 part series of posts. Growing up, Terry Crews watched his father violently abuse his mother using power and authority to dominate her. As he grew up, this thought transformed the type of man he became.

Just Your Average American

16,373 次观看 • 5 个月前

I am posting this video not to further bring pain and ridicule to the President and his family, but rather as a testament of the Ilocano’s enduring belief on the Marcos legacy. No matter the challenges and betrayal inflicted, even by one family member, we will stay the course. The accusations thrown by Senator Imee Marcos against President Ferdinand Marcos cut deep because they twist an old chapter of family pain into a weapon for present politics. After EDSA 1, he was a young man drowning in anger, confusion, and the humiliation of seeing his father dragged down and his family scattered. Anyone with a heart would understand the emotional weight he carried then. But to resurrect that vulnerable period and convert it into claims of addiction today is cruel, dishonest, and done with full political intent. Everything about his life now contradicts that lie—his calm judgment, his measured decisions, his disciplined leadership under pressure. These are the habits of a steady commander, not a man lost to substances. His conduct itself is the proof that the allegations are nothing more than a desperate attempt to wound him where he once hurt most. And while she slings old shadows, the President has delivered real light to the nation. Under his leadership, inflation dropped sharply, giving families stability denied to them for years. Farmers were finally freed from decades of debt. Classrooms rose, children returned to school, health facilities expanded, and foreign investors came back with confidence. Jobs grew. Hope returned. He strengthened our alliances and defended the West Philippine Sea with firmness free of theatrics. These gains did not come from chaos, but rather from discipline, clarity, and hard work. They came from a man who knows the weight of the nation and carries it with calm strength. His achievements are the loudest, clearest answer to every lie thrown his way. But the deepest pain was yet to be inflicted; not from his enemies, but from his own blood. Nothing is more shameful—nothing more unforgivable—than the betrayal committed by his own sister. Imee did not simply criticize him; she walked onto a stage beside the Dutertes and their circle, the very clan that tried for years to destroy her brother’s credibility, poison the public against him, and destabilise his government. She borrowed their poison and spat it back at her own blood infront of a massive crowd cheering her. It was not truth-telling, not concern—it was political hunger. She turned her back not only on her brother but on the Ilocano people who carried the Marcos name through fire and exile, through decades of ridicule and hardship, and who believed that unity within the family was sacred. By siding with the Dutertes, she shattered that sacred trust in front of the whole nation. And now she must face the coldest wrath of the North—not through ruin or violence, but through something far more devastating to an Ilocano soul: SILENCE. Ilocanos do not rage when betrayed. We do not riot. We close our doors. We turn our backs. We remove a name from our homes, from our gatherings, from our stories, from the memory of our children. We do not curse—we simply stop acknowledging the existence of the one who broke faith. That is the fate that now awaits Imee Marcos. She may still sit in the Senate. She may still speak on stages. But in the North, where loyalty is life, she will be a ghost. No festive welcome. No warm embrace. No belonging. Only doors shut gently, permanently, without explanation. She chose ambition over blood, treachery over loyalty, and the Dutertes over her own brother. And for that choice, the Ilocanos will shut their doors on her forever. #ForeverLoyalist

I am posting this video not to further bring pain and ridicule to the President and his family, but rather as a testament of the Ilocano’s enduring belief on the Marcos legacy. No matter the challenges and betrayal inflicted, even by one family member, we will stay the course. The accusations thrown by Senator Imee Marcos against President Ferdinand Marcos cut deep because they twist an old chapter of family pain into a weapon for present politics. After EDSA 1, he was a young man drowning in anger, confusion, and the humiliation of seeing his father dragged down and his family scattered. Anyone with a heart would understand the emotional weight he carried then. But to resurrect that vulnerable period and convert it into claims of addiction today is cruel, dishonest, and done with full political intent. Everything about his life now contradicts that lie—his calm judgment, his measured decisions, his disciplined leadership under pressure. These are the habits of a steady commander, not a man lost to substances. His conduct itself is the proof that the allegations are nothing more than a desperate attempt to wound him where he once hurt most. And while she slings old shadows, the President has delivered real light to the nation. Under his leadership, inflation dropped sharply, giving families stability denied to them for years. Farmers were finally freed from decades of debt. Classrooms rose, children returned to school, health facilities expanded, and foreign investors came back with confidence. Jobs grew. Hope returned. He strengthened our alliances and defended the West Philippine Sea with firmness free of theatrics. These gains did not come from chaos, but rather from discipline, clarity, and hard work. They came from a man who knows the weight of the nation and carries it with calm strength. His achievements are the loudest, clearest answer to every lie thrown his way. But the deepest pain was yet to be inflicted; not from his enemies, but from his own blood. Nothing is more shameful—nothing more unforgivable—than the betrayal committed by his own sister. Imee did not simply criticize him; she walked onto a stage beside the Dutertes and their circle, the very clan that tried for years to destroy her brother’s credibility, poison the public against him, and destabilise his government. She borrowed their poison and spat it back at her own blood infront of a massive crowd cheering her. It was not truth-telling, not concern—it was political hunger. She turned her back not only on her brother but on the Ilocano people who carried the Marcos name through fire and exile, through decades of ridicule and hardship, and who believed that unity within the family was sacred. By siding with the Dutertes, she shattered that sacred trust in front of the whole nation. And now she must face the coldest wrath of the North—not through ruin or violence, but through something far more devastating to an Ilocano soul: SILENCE. Ilocanos do not rage when betrayed. We do not riot. We close our doors. We turn our backs. We remove a name from our homes, from our gatherings, from our stories, from the memory of our children. We do not curse—we simply stop acknowledging the existence of the one who broke faith. That is the fate that now awaits Imee Marcos. She may still sit in the Senate. She may still speak on stages. But in the North, where loyalty is life, she will be a ghost. No festive welcome. No warm embrace. No belonging. Only doors shut gently, permanently, without explanation. She chose ambition over blood, treachery over loyalty, and the Dutertes over her own brother. And for that choice, the Ilocanos will shut their doors on her forever. #ForeverLoyalist

The King

48,818 次观看 • 9 个月前

𝘖𝘯 𝘉𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵 𝘙𝘢𝘵𝘯𝘢 𝙋𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙗 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚'𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙝𝙖 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵'𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘕𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘢 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘪. 𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗔 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗜 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥, 𝗣𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗕 𝗠𝗨𝗞𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗘𝗘: 𝗔 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗗 𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗧 In the world of polity, where relationships are defined by formalities and protocol, the bond between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and my father, Pranab Mukherjee, stands out as a rare example of camaraderie that transcended political boundaries. Despite ideologically contrasting backgrounds, their relationship blossomed on the foundations of mutual admiration, respect, and a shared commitment to the nation. When Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, he was stepping onto the national stage after over a decade as Chief Minister of Gujarat. My father, then President of India, with his vast experience in governance, became an indispensable guide to Narendra Modi. I remember how warmly Baba welcomed him, offering his support in constitutional matters while respecting their distinct roles. During their very first meeting after Narendra Modi’s electoral victory in 2014, the Prime Minister touched my father’s feet—a gesture of reverence that left a lasting impression on everyone. Baba later told me about that moment and how he candidly assured Narendra Modi: “We belong to two different ideologies, but the people have given you a mandate. I will not interfere with governance—that is your job. But I will be there if you need help in any constitutional matter.” Narendra Modi often acknowledged the significance of this assurance, recounting in one of my conversations with him. He said, “For Dada to say this was a big thing. From the beginning, there was openness and honesty between us.” Baba’s diary entries revealed just how profound their bond was. He noted that even when Narendra Modi was Gujarat’s Chief Minister and a vocal critic of the Congress, he always touched Baba’s feet during their private meetings. “I don’t know why, but he has a strange soft corner for me,” Baba once wrote. Their connection extended beyond governance into shared values and spirituality. Baba once told Narendra Modi that their bond might stem from their mutual reverence for Swami Vivekananda and Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa, central figures in the Ramakrishna Mission. Narendra Modi often referred to my father as a mentor, especially during his early days as Prime Minister. Baba’s wisdom and experience in navigating the complexities of governance provided invaluable guidance. At Baba’s farewell ceremony as President in 2017, Narendra Modi delivered an emotional speech, calling him “a father figure” and “a mentor who inspired me to work harder for the nation.” This admiration was mutual. In his memoir, The Presidential Years: 2012–2017, Baba praised Narendra Modi’s decisiveness and work ethic while acknowledging occasional policy disagreements. He appreciated Narendra Modi’s governance reforms and his ability to connect with people. Baba wrote in his diary, “Modi has a very professional approach to statecraft. He truly feels the pulse of the people.” He also observed that, after Indira Gandhi, Narendra Modi is one of the rare Prime Ministers who not only understands the pulse of the people but also possesses immense political strength. My father also had some initial apprehensions about how Narendra Modi, coming from state politics and without prior experience in national or parliamentary roles, would handle India’s complex foreign policy. PM Modi’s transition from state politics to the national stage, becoming a Member of Parliament and then the Prime Minister, was a significant leap. However, my father was quick to appreciate PM Modi's ability to adapt and excel. He remarked in several interviews, how PM Modi swiftly grasped the intricacies of India’s foreign policy—a domain known for its complexity. During his 2014 oath-taking ceremony, Narendra Modi made a decision to invite the SAARC leaders, a gesture that my father deeply appreciated. He considered it a highly innovative and strategic initiative, remarking that PM Modi is truly an out-of-the-box thinker. My father not only praised this bold move but also offered a word of advice to the Prime Minister to ensure that security arrangements were exceptionally tight. Their bond extended beyond official duties. I recall an instance when Narendra Modi, learning that Baba felt uneasy without work after retiring as President, personally called him. “Dada, please don’t be depressed. Your words of wisdom have great value for the nation. You should speak your mind at seminars and public events,” he told Baba. This simple yet thoughtful gesture showcased the depth of their connection. One of the most heartfelt moments in their relationship was Narendra Modi’s handwritten farewell letter to Baba, calling him a “father figure” and expressing deep gratitude. Baba was touched by this gesture and even shared the letter on social media, showcasing the emotional bond they shared. When Baba passed away in August 2020, Narendra Modi’s tributes revealed the void his absence left in his life. Calling Baba a “guide and mentor,” Narendra Modi emphasized his commitment to placing the nation above political divides. When Baba was awarded the Bharat Ratna, I remember seeing Narendra Modi Ji’s face beam with pride. He was genuinely happy, a moment that reflected the magnanimity of his government in honouring stalwarts irrespective of political affiliations. My father often said, “Modi is a quick learner and a hard worker.” The work ethic Narendra Modi demonstrated—reportedly working up to 20 hours a day—resonated with my father, who shared a similar dedication to public service during his career. Their relationship is a powerful example of how mutual respect and shared dedication to national progress can transcend political differences. Their relationship leaves a legacy of unity and statesmanship for future generations to emulate #ModiStory

𝘖𝘯 𝘉𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵 𝘙𝘢𝘵𝘯𝘢 𝙋𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙗 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚'𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙝𝙖 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵'𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘕𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘢 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘪. 𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗔 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗜 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥, 𝗣𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗕 𝗠𝗨𝗞𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗘𝗘: 𝗔 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗗 𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗧 In the world of polity, where relationships are defined by formalities and protocol, the bond between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and my father, Pranab Mukherjee, stands out as a rare example of camaraderie that transcended political boundaries. Despite ideologically contrasting backgrounds, their relationship blossomed on the foundations of mutual admiration, respect, and a shared commitment to the nation. When Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, he was stepping onto the national stage after over a decade as Chief Minister of Gujarat. My father, then President of India, with his vast experience in governance, became an indispensable guide to Narendra Modi. I remember how warmly Baba welcomed him, offering his support in constitutional matters while respecting their distinct roles. During their very first meeting after Narendra Modi’s electoral victory in 2014, the Prime Minister touched my father’s feet—a gesture of reverence that left a lasting impression on everyone. Baba later told me about that moment and how he candidly assured Narendra Modi: “We belong to two different ideologies, but the people have given you a mandate. I will not interfere with governance—that is your job. But I will be there if you need help in any constitutional matter.” Narendra Modi often acknowledged the significance of this assurance, recounting in one of my conversations with him. He said, “For Dada to say this was a big thing. From the beginning, there was openness and honesty between us.” Baba’s diary entries revealed just how profound their bond was. He noted that even when Narendra Modi was Gujarat’s Chief Minister and a vocal critic of the Congress, he always touched Baba’s feet during their private meetings. “I don’t know why, but he has a strange soft corner for me,” Baba once wrote. Their connection extended beyond governance into shared values and spirituality. Baba once told Narendra Modi that their bond might stem from their mutual reverence for Swami Vivekananda and Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa, central figures in the Ramakrishna Mission. Narendra Modi often referred to my father as a mentor, especially during his early days as Prime Minister. Baba’s wisdom and experience in navigating the complexities of governance provided invaluable guidance. At Baba’s farewell ceremony as President in 2017, Narendra Modi delivered an emotional speech, calling him “a father figure” and “a mentor who inspired me to work harder for the nation.” This admiration was mutual. In his memoir, The Presidential Years: 2012–2017, Baba praised Narendra Modi’s decisiveness and work ethic while acknowledging occasional policy disagreements. He appreciated Narendra Modi’s governance reforms and his ability to connect with people. Baba wrote in his diary, “Modi has a very professional approach to statecraft. He truly feels the pulse of the people.” He also observed that, after Indira Gandhi, Narendra Modi is one of the rare Prime Ministers who not only understands the pulse of the people but also possesses immense political strength. My father also had some initial apprehensions about how Narendra Modi, coming from state politics and without prior experience in national or parliamentary roles, would handle India’s complex foreign policy. PM Modi’s transition from state politics to the national stage, becoming a Member of Parliament and then the Prime Minister, was a significant leap. However, my father was quick to appreciate PM Modi's ability to adapt and excel. He remarked in several interviews, how PM Modi swiftly grasped the intricacies of India’s foreign policy—a domain known for its complexity. During his 2014 oath-taking ceremony, Narendra Modi made a decision to invite the SAARC leaders, a gesture that my father deeply appreciated. He considered it a highly innovative and strategic initiative, remarking that PM Modi is truly an out-of-the-box thinker. My father not only praised this bold move but also offered a word of advice to the Prime Minister to ensure that security arrangements were exceptionally tight. Their bond extended beyond official duties. I recall an instance when Narendra Modi, learning that Baba felt uneasy without work after retiring as President, personally called him. “Dada, please don’t be depressed. Your words of wisdom have great value for the nation. You should speak your mind at seminars and public events,” he told Baba. This simple yet thoughtful gesture showcased the depth of their connection. One of the most heartfelt moments in their relationship was Narendra Modi’s handwritten farewell letter to Baba, calling him a “father figure” and expressing deep gratitude. Baba was touched by this gesture and even shared the letter on social media, showcasing the emotional bond they shared. When Baba passed away in August 2020, Narendra Modi’s tributes revealed the void his absence left in his life. Calling Baba a “guide and mentor,” Narendra Modi emphasized his commitment to placing the nation above political divides. When Baba was awarded the Bharat Ratna, I remember seeing Narendra Modi Ji’s face beam with pride. He was genuinely happy, a moment that reflected the magnanimity of his government in honouring stalwarts irrespective of political affiliations. My father often said, “Modi is a quick learner and a hard worker.” The work ethic Narendra Modi demonstrated—reportedly working up to 20 hours a day—resonated with my father, who shared a similar dedication to public service during his career. Their relationship is a powerful example of how mutual respect and shared dedication to national progress can transcend political differences. Their relationship leaves a legacy of unity and statesmanship for future generations to emulate #ModiStory

Modi Story

1,271,089 次观看 • 1 年前

So now the picture gets darker… Three days before Charlie’s memorial, Israel formalized a $4 million contract with ‘Show Faith by Works’, a California firm hired to run what it called the “largest Christian Church Geofencing Campaign in U.S. history.” After the memorial itself, Andrew Kolvet publicly boasted that their “tech partners” had tracked over 277,000 devices in and around the stadium, ie the phones of grieving Christians, all digitally tagged and harvested under the pretext of “outreach.” Layer that with what’s now surfacing… Multiple reports claim Charlie had rejected a massive offer, allegedly around $150 million, from Israeli interests and their billionaire backers. Whether that figure is exact or not, it’s clear there was intense pressure for him to continue to align with Israel’s agenda. According to Candace Owens, that refusal may have triggered serious internal conflict within Turning Point USA itself. Owens has openly suggested that Charlie’s defiance, his unwillingness to be bought and his refusal to compromise, made enemies not just outside TPUSA but within it. Enemies with everything to lose if he exposed or resisted the machinery of influence operating behind the scenes. So the question must be asked: Was Charlie Kirk killed for saying no? Was his death part of an internal plot within Turning Point USA to remove a leader who threatened the financial and political lifeline of the organization? Was his martyrdom the cost of rejecting Zionist money, leaving others free to realign TPUSA with Israel immediately after his death? I don’t know the answers, but the timing, the contracts, and the digital harvesting of Christians at his memorial demand that we at least ask the questions. Maybe Charlie’s greatest “crime” was simply saying ‘NO’, and in a world where loyalty is bought and influence is currency, that kind of integrity can be deadly.

So now the picture gets darker… Three days before Charlie’s memorial, Israel formalized a $4 million contract with ‘Show Faith by Works’, a California firm hired to run what it called the “largest Christian Church Geofencing Campaign in U.S. history.” After the memorial itself, Andrew Kolvet publicly boasted that their “tech partners” had tracked over 277,000 devices in and around the stadium, ie the phones of grieving Christians, all digitally tagged and harvested under the pretext of “outreach.” Layer that with what’s now surfacing… Multiple reports claim Charlie had rejected a massive offer, allegedly around $150 million, from Israeli interests and their billionaire backers. Whether that figure is exact or not, it’s clear there was intense pressure for him to continue to align with Israel’s agenda. According to Candace Owens, that refusal may have triggered serious internal conflict within Turning Point USA itself. Owens has openly suggested that Charlie’s defiance, his unwillingness to be bought and his refusal to compromise, made enemies not just outside TPUSA but within it. Enemies with everything to lose if he exposed or resisted the machinery of influence operating behind the scenes. So the question must be asked: Was Charlie Kirk killed for saying no? Was his death part of an internal plot within Turning Point USA to remove a leader who threatened the financial and political lifeline of the organization? Was his martyrdom the cost of rejecting Zionist money, leaving others free to realign TPUSA with Israel immediately after his death? I don’t know the answers, but the timing, the contracts, and the digital harvesting of Christians at his memorial demand that we at least ask the questions. Maybe Charlie’s greatest “crime” was simply saying ‘NO’, and in a world where loyalty is bought and influence is currency, that kind of integrity can be deadly.

Laura Aboli Official

642,078 次观看 • 11 个月前

SM Krishna: A personal tribute I woke up today to the news of the passing of Sri SM Krishna, one of the most progressive and visionary former Chief Minister of Karnataka. Though my personal interactions with him have been limited to a few interactions at public events, the loss seemed deeply personal. As I booked tickets to Bengaluru to pay my last respects to the great man, I realised how deeply I was inspired by him in a multitude of ways. Mr. Krishna was the CM of Karnataka when I was in school, when I was first forming my worldview of politics and public life. It was the days when I was contesting my school elections for Head Boy and was tasting action in democracy for the first time. Naturally, as CM, Krishna dominated the newspapers and TV channels and I would follow his interactions with great interest. Also, it was the time when Dr. Rajkumar was abducted by Veerappan and we would have school holidays declared regularly. Many school children of my age, we would watch news with curiosity to know if the CM would declare another holiday. In all those interviews, the CM’s poise, his weighted choice of words and his resoluteness impressed my young mind. This inspired me deeply and drew me to him. The more I followed him, as a young boy interested in politics, the more I wanted to model myself after him. Mr. Krishna was in many respects a leader ahead of his times. At a time when political leaders were deeply influenced by socialism to the point of opposing industrialisation and urbanisation, Krishna was a clear believer in free markets, industrialisation and the need for urbanisation to create mass level prosperity. It was under his leadership that Bengaluru emerged as the country’s IT capital, leveraging its unique educational and human resource capabilities. Most of the now big IT services firms of the country received immense policy support during Krishna’s time. Bengaluru also saw its infrastructure develop rapidly. From the metro to the flyovers to the ring roads to the work on the new airport - all received tremendous attention under SM Krishna. He clearly understood that cities are the engines of growth and prosperity and that they needed to be given the political and financial capital needed. Even to this day, unfortunately, many political leaders and parties do not understand this and continue to ignore our urban development needs. Perhaps, this distance from socialism also had a role in his sartorial choices. While it was expected that political leaders should dress in the modest Khadi and shun flamboyance in an attempt to resonate with the poor masses, Krishna was flamboyant, stylish and savvy. He dressed well, like how the leader of an aspiring global city should. I have never seen him dressed shabbily ever, even in photos from the hospital bed. There was something regal about his appearance. I have googled so many of his pictures to try and buy similar clothes, ties and pocket squares. He is undoubtedly the most stylish politician of Karnataka. Mr. Krishna’s term as CM was not a bed of roses. The abduction of Dr. Rajkumar was one of the most difficult challenges that faced him and the way he handled the issue tactically, coordinating with CM Jayalalitha and also initiating track two dialogues with the forest brigand, and finally ensuring the release of Rajkumar is a lesson for many in crisis management and diplomacy. Unfortunately, the state suffered continuous drought during his CM-ship and despite his best efforts, the farmers crisis across the state remained quite acute and even led to the eventual loss of the Congress Party in the elections. Despite these challenges, his leadership transformed Bengaluru and created tremendous wealth for people of Karnataka. If Karnataka is among the wealthiest states in the country and Bengaluru is the richest city in the country in terms of per capita income, Krishna’s role is significant. While SM Krishna will be remembered for his developmental role, his crisis handling skills and his contribution to modern Bengaluru, he will mostly be loved by Kannadigas for the decency and dignity with which he carried his public life - a value so rare in Indian politics. All his interviews, in both English and Kannada are a treat to watch for his command over the languages and the depth in which he addressed the subjects and importantly for the decency with which he addressed all, including his sharpest rivals. His dignified personal conduct won him many admirers across political divides - even traditional BJP voting families like mine were ardent supporters of Krishna. It was like homecoming when Krishna joined the BJP in 2019, inspired by PM Modi. An ardent connoisseur of arts, Mr. Krishna and his wife Prema were often spotted at the cultural and theatre circuit of Bengaluru. I have seen him and his wife at the Rama Seva Mandali Ramotsava music festival many times. He was in the mould of our Mysuru Maharajas who were not only great patrons of our classical arts, but were passionate connoisseurs themselves. A state’s cultural life gets enriched with such political leaders. Even a year ago, I met Mr. Krishna at a play where we both were guests and I got an opportunity to take his blessings. In many ways, SM Krishna deeply influenced me in my formative days as a young school boy aspiring to get into politics. From his dignified public conduct to his focus on industrialisation and urbanisation to his impeccable sartorial choices - his influence was immense. I was delighted when he joined the BJP just before the 2019 elections and even came to campaign for me. He was not in the best of health then, but despite that, he stood in the heat in the campaign vehicle for more than an hour and even indulged my selfie videos. His support meant a lot to me personally. As we bid farewell to him, those of us in public life must resolve to conduct our politics in his mould - dignified, accommodating, progressive and prosperity creating for our people. I appeal to CM Siddaramaiah and DCM DK Shivakumar to institute an award in Sri SM Krishna’s name to honour those who make a significant contribution to the development of Bengaluru - it will not only inspire many to work for our city but also keep the memory of an inspired life alive. As a proud Kannadiga and a Bengaluru boy, I thank Sri SM Krishna for everything. Go well, Sir.

SM Krishna: A personal tribute I woke up today to the news of the passing of Sri SM Krishna, one of the most progressive and visionary former Chief Minister of Karnataka. Though my personal interactions with him have been limited to a few interactions at public events, the loss seemed deeply personal. As I booked tickets to Bengaluru to pay my last respects to the great man, I realised how deeply I was inspired by him in a multitude of ways. Mr. Krishna was the CM of Karnataka when I was in school, when I was first forming my worldview of politics and public life. It was the days when I was contesting my school elections for Head Boy and was tasting action in democracy for the first time. Naturally, as CM, Krishna dominated the newspapers and TV channels and I would follow his interactions with great interest. Also, it was the time when Dr. Rajkumar was abducted by Veerappan and we would have school holidays declared regularly. Many school children of my age, we would watch news with curiosity to know if the CM would declare another holiday. In all those interviews, the CM’s poise, his weighted choice of words and his resoluteness impressed my young mind. This inspired me deeply and drew me to him. The more I followed him, as a young boy interested in politics, the more I wanted to model myself after him. Mr. Krishna was in many respects a leader ahead of his times. At a time when political leaders were deeply influenced by socialism to the point of opposing industrialisation and urbanisation, Krishna was a clear believer in free markets, industrialisation and the need for urbanisation to create mass level prosperity. It was under his leadership that Bengaluru emerged as the country’s IT capital, leveraging its unique educational and human resource capabilities. Most of the now big IT services firms of the country received immense policy support during Krishna’s time. Bengaluru also saw its infrastructure develop rapidly. From the metro to the flyovers to the ring roads to the work on the new airport - all received tremendous attention under SM Krishna. He clearly understood that cities are the engines of growth and prosperity and that they needed to be given the political and financial capital needed. Even to this day, unfortunately, many political leaders and parties do not understand this and continue to ignore our urban development needs. Perhaps, this distance from socialism also had a role in his sartorial choices. While it was expected that political leaders should dress in the modest Khadi and shun flamboyance in an attempt to resonate with the poor masses, Krishna was flamboyant, stylish and savvy. He dressed well, like how the leader of an aspiring global city should. I have never seen him dressed shabbily ever, even in photos from the hospital bed. There was something regal about his appearance. I have googled so many of his pictures to try and buy similar clothes, ties and pocket squares. He is undoubtedly the most stylish politician of Karnataka. Mr. Krishna’s term as CM was not a bed of roses. The abduction of Dr. Rajkumar was one of the most difficult challenges that faced him and the way he handled the issue tactically, coordinating with CM Jayalalitha and also initiating track two dialogues with the forest brigand, and finally ensuring the release of Rajkumar is a lesson for many in crisis management and diplomacy. Unfortunately, the state suffered continuous drought during his CM-ship and despite his best efforts, the farmers crisis across the state remained quite acute and even led to the eventual loss of the Congress Party in the elections. Despite these challenges, his leadership transformed Bengaluru and created tremendous wealth for people of Karnataka. If Karnataka is among the wealthiest states in the country and Bengaluru is the richest city in the country in terms of per capita income, Krishna’s role is significant. While SM Krishna will be remembered for his developmental role, his crisis handling skills and his contribution to modern Bengaluru, he will mostly be loved by Kannadigas for the decency and dignity with which he carried his public life - a value so rare in Indian politics. All his interviews, in both English and Kannada are a treat to watch for his command over the languages and the depth in which he addressed the subjects and importantly for the decency with which he addressed all, including his sharpest rivals. His dignified personal conduct won him many admirers across political divides - even traditional BJP voting families like mine were ardent supporters of Krishna. It was like homecoming when Krishna joined the BJP in 2019, inspired by PM Modi. An ardent connoisseur of arts, Mr. Krishna and his wife Prema were often spotted at the cultural and theatre circuit of Bengaluru. I have seen him and his wife at the Rama Seva Mandali Ramotsava music festival many times. He was in the mould of our Mysuru Maharajas who were not only great patrons of our classical arts, but were passionate connoisseurs themselves. A state’s cultural life gets enriched with such political leaders. Even a year ago, I met Mr. Krishna at a play where we both were guests and I got an opportunity to take his blessings. In many ways, SM Krishna deeply influenced me in my formative days as a young school boy aspiring to get into politics. From his dignified public conduct to his focus on industrialisation and urbanisation to his impeccable sartorial choices - his influence was immense. I was delighted when he joined the BJP just before the 2019 elections and even came to campaign for me. He was not in the best of health then, but despite that, he stood in the heat in the campaign vehicle for more than an hour and even indulged my selfie videos. His support meant a lot to me personally. As we bid farewell to him, those of us in public life must resolve to conduct our politics in his mould - dignified, accommodating, progressive and prosperity creating for our people. I appeal to CM Siddaramaiah and DCM DK Shivakumar to institute an award in Sri SM Krishna’s name to honour those who make a significant contribution to the development of Bengaluru - it will not only inspire many to work for our city but also keep the memory of an inspired life alive. As a proud Kannadiga and a Bengaluru boy, I thank Sri SM Krishna for everything. Go well, Sir.

Tejasvi Surya

71,999 次观看 • 1 年前

No, Nigel Farage , the issue isn’t whether Tommy Robinson is the right fit for Reform. The real problem is your blatant misrepresentation of his arrest and your deafening silence on the very issues Robinson has been courageously exposing for decades. Denying that Tommy is a political prisoner does nothing to address the reality of his situation. While Robinson endures solitary confinement, punished for refusing to be silenced by the establishment, you’re comfortably enjoying Christmas with your family, free from the consequences of speaking truth to power. Let’s not forget that Tommy is a working-class hero, standing up for those who’ve been ignored and betrayed. Far from helping, your dismissive rhetoric only adds to the divide. Instead of bad-mouthing a man who’s sacrificed so much, perhaps it’s time to reflect on your arrogance. Tommy himself has made it clear: “I was arrested under terror legislation. I’m on bail under terror legislation. It was an abuse of power. Don’t lie about it…because you’re too scared to talk about me.” If you truly care about your voters and your country, Mr. Farage, you’ll stop lying about Robinson, acknowledge his plight, and apologize for your divisive remarks. Then, as any gentleman would, step back and let your actions speak louder than your ego. The people deserve leaders who listen—not those who evade tough truths.

No, Nigel Farage , the issue isn’t whether Tommy Robinson is the right fit for Reform. The real problem is your blatant misrepresentation of his arrest and your deafening silence on the very issues Robinson has been courageously exposing for decades. Denying that Tommy is a political prisoner does nothing to address the reality of his situation. While Robinson endures solitary confinement, punished for refusing to be silenced by the establishment, you’re comfortably enjoying Christmas with your family, free from the consequences of speaking truth to power. Let’s not forget that Tommy is a working-class hero, standing up for those who’ve been ignored and betrayed. Far from helping, your dismissive rhetoric only adds to the divide. Instead of bad-mouthing a man who’s sacrificed so much, perhaps it’s time to reflect on your arrogance. Tommy himself has made it clear: “I was arrested under terror legislation. I’m on bail under terror legislation. It was an abuse of power. Don’t lie about it…because you’re too scared to talk about me.” If you truly care about your voters and your country, Mr. Farage, you’ll stop lying about Robinson, acknowledge his plight, and apologize for your divisive remarks. Then, as any gentleman would, step back and let your actions speak louder than your ego. The people deserve leaders who listen—not those who evade tough truths.

Vicky Richter🇩🇪🇺🇸🇧🇷🇬🇧

115,393 次观看 • 1 年前

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

Congress

45,430 次观看 • 9 个月前

WHEN THE KITCHEN GETS HOT, THEY UNCEREMONIOUSLY BOLT OUT: FIRST IT WAS NELSON CHAMISA, NOW IT’S TENDAI BITI, WHO IS NEXT? The recent state of the conduct of leadership ranks in the Zimbabwean political opposition is unprecedented in the country’s political history. Just last January, Nelson Chamisa bolted out and abandoned the presidency of his CCC faction founded under a 4-page constitution which made him synonymous with the party and its sole convenor and chief administrator, with no deputy and with no succession provisions. His sudden departure effectively meant the dissolution of his CCC by operation of law, notwithstanding the fact that there are some political vultures like Jameson Timba who are currently trying to find rotten meat from Chamisa’s dissolved CCC carcass. And there was the incredible spectacle of Fadzayi Mahere and Allan Norman Rusty Markham, whose real story and its implications are yet to be told, who bolted out not only from the CCC carcass deserted by Chamisa, but also from Parliament making never before heard arguments from any parliament anywhere in the world. For example, Mahere whose letter of resignation was dated 29 January 2024, posted on X that one of her major reasons for bolting out of Parliament only after four months of a five-year term was because of “the tainted state of Parliament, coupled with sundry breaches of Parliamentary privilege, illegal suspensions and the decision by President Nelson Chamisa to dissociate himself from the captured CCC have made it untenable for me to continue as a member of parliament for Mt Pleasant Constituency under the CCC banner”. And Markham whose resignation letter was dated 31 January 2024, who posted on X that, “my resignation note I referred to the “tick the box” and a “rubber stamp” parliament with no oversight”; as if he was ignorant of the fact that he had been elected in Harare East constituency precisely to provide the oversight that would make Parliament less of the “rubber stamp” he alleged that it was. That any serious Member of Parliament would invoke such frivolous reasons as made by Mahere and Markham to justify betraying the constituencies that elected them, and to bolt out, only four months after they were sworn in for a five-year term is shocking, to say the least. Clearly, Zimbabwe does indeed need better opposition leaders than these kinds who are given to such gross negligence, breached the duty of constituency-representation with reckless abandon. Surprisingly, Tendai Biti is cut from the same cloth. Only some 60 or so days after he boldly declared that he was CCC Vice President elected by that party’s congress and that he was “going nowhere”, now he says he is actually going somewhere after all; by taking “time out”; taking a “sabbatical” to go to Washington DC, of all places. And he’s saying this at a time when he’s in fact due to take over - something he accepted to do when he knew at that time that he was due to go to the US by this fall - as CCC acting president under the ‘rotational’ arrangement they agreed to as the ‘leadership collective’ under the ‘Gweru Resolutions’. Effectively, like Chamisa, Mahere and Markham, Biti is bolting out. He is running away from leadership responsibility. This makes sense of their mantra that they ‘need new leaders’!

WHEN THE KITCHEN GETS HOT, THEY UNCEREMONIOUSLY BOLT OUT: FIRST IT WAS NELSON CHAMISA, NOW IT’S TENDAI BITI, WHO IS NEXT? The recent state of the conduct of leadership ranks in the Zimbabwean political opposition is unprecedented in the country’s political history. Just last January, Nelson Chamisa bolted out and abandoned the presidency of his CCC faction founded under a 4-page constitution which made him synonymous with the party and its sole convenor and chief administrator, with no deputy and with no succession provisions. His sudden departure effectively meant the dissolution of his CCC by operation of law, notwithstanding the fact that there are some political vultures like Jameson Timba who are currently trying to find rotten meat from Chamisa’s dissolved CCC carcass. And there was the incredible spectacle of Fadzayi Mahere and Allan Norman Rusty Markham, whose real story and its implications are yet to be told, who bolted out not only from the CCC carcass deserted by Chamisa, but also from Parliament making never before heard arguments from any parliament anywhere in the world. For example, Mahere whose letter of resignation was dated 29 January 2024, posted on X that one of her major reasons for bolting out of Parliament only after four months of a five-year term was because of “the tainted state of Parliament, coupled with sundry breaches of Parliamentary privilege, illegal suspensions and the decision by President Nelson Chamisa to dissociate himself from the captured CCC have made it untenable for me to continue as a member of parliament for Mt Pleasant Constituency under the CCC banner”. And Markham whose resignation letter was dated 31 January 2024, who posted on X that, “my resignation note I referred to the “tick the box” and a “rubber stamp” parliament with no oversight”; as if he was ignorant of the fact that he had been elected in Harare East constituency precisely to provide the oversight that would make Parliament less of the “rubber stamp” he alleged that it was. That any serious Member of Parliament would invoke such frivolous reasons as made by Mahere and Markham to justify betraying the constituencies that elected them, and to bolt out, only four months after they were sworn in for a five-year term is shocking, to say the least. Clearly, Zimbabwe does indeed need better opposition leaders than these kinds who are given to such gross negligence, breached the duty of constituency-representation with reckless abandon. Surprisingly, Tendai Biti is cut from the same cloth. Only some 60 or so days after he boldly declared that he was CCC Vice President elected by that party’s congress and that he was “going nowhere”, now he says he is actually going somewhere after all; by taking “time out”; taking a “sabbatical” to go to Washington DC, of all places. And he’s saying this at a time when he’s in fact due to take over - something he accepted to do when he knew at that time that he was due to go to the US by this fall - as CCC acting president under the ‘rotational’ arrangement they agreed to as the ‘leadership collective’ under the ‘Gweru Resolutions’. Effectively, like Chamisa, Mahere and Markham, Biti is bolting out. He is running away from leadership responsibility. This makes sense of their mantra that they ‘need new leaders’!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

175,364 次观看 • 2 年前

NFSC Exclusive: Xi Jinping Is Rewriting China’s Narrative of Power — From the Mao Zedong Era to the Xi Jinping Era. 🔹On September 30, 2025, Xi Jinping paid his annual tribute at the Monument to the People’s Heroes on the eve of China’s National Day (October 1, commemorating the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949), also known as the "Martyrs' Day." September 30, 2014, marked China’s first official Martyrs’ Day, established by Xi shortly after he took power in 2013. It signaled the beginning of his campaign to reshape the Communist Party’s official narrative — its historical legitimacy and political lineage. 🔹The “Magic Staff” as a Metaphor for Power The Monument to the People’s Heroes, built under Mao Zedong’s direction, was regarded by Mao as a giant “magic staff” — symbolizing political power that is both omnipotent and divinely authorized. It also reflects how the Communist leadership has often treated power as both sacred and deeply personal, concentrated in the hands of a single ruler. 🔹 Rewriting History Through “Martyrs of China” and the Monument Under Xi Jinping, greater emphasis has been placed on revolutionary figures such as his father, Xi Zhongxun, and other “Yan’an faction” leaders like Liu Zhidan and Gao Gang — whom Xi regards as key figures who helped Mao Zedong survive the Long March and rebuild the Communist Party. The Long March — a brutal year-long retreat in which the Red Army was defeated and scattered by Nationalist forces — left only a few thousand survivors. Mao and his followers eventually reached Yan’an, a remote city in northwest China’s Shaanxi Province, which became the CCP’s headquarters from 1935 to 1948 and the cradle of its revolutionary identity. By elevating these figures, whom he honors as “Martyrs of China,” and linking them to his own family, Xi signals a “return to ancestral roots.” This reframing subtly strips away Mao’s central role in the Party’s revolutionary narrative, repositioning legitimacy within Xi’s own lineage and the Yan’an tradition. In doing so, Xi is reconstructing Party history to elevate his family’s legacy and revive a form of bloodline-based political legitimacy that ties authority to heritage rather than ideology. 🔹 The September Changchun Airshow: Youth and Loyalty The recent Changchun Airshow offers a clear example of Xi Jinping’s effort to cultivate a new generation of loyalists within China’s military and state apparatus. Participation was tightly controlled and limited to individuals aligned with Xi, with nearly all the pilots, staff, and journalists under the age of thirty. This was more than a public military exhibition — it was a symbolic exercise in political loyalty and generational renewal. By elevating young soldiers, performers, and media figures to the forefront, Xi signaled his intention to build a political base that is both younger and personally devoted to him. The move recalls Mao Zedong’s mobilization of youth during the Cultural Revolution, when students served as “Red Guards” to enforce revolutionary fervor and ideological purity. The message is clear: replace the older cadres with a new generation whose careers and loyalties are tied directly to Xi — reinforcing an increasingly centralized and personalized system of power. 🔹 Upholding Mao to Defeat Mao On the surface, Xi Jinping appears to honor Mao Zedong as the founding hero of the Communist Party. But in reality, his strategy is more calculated: he uses Mao’s image and authority to reject Mao’s ideas, legitimizing his own rule and concentrating power in his hands. It is one of Xi’s most skillful political maneuvers — using the aura of an old symbol to construct a new form of rule. 🔹 The Symbolism of “Returning to the Ancestral Line” “Returning to the Ancestral Line” refers to a symbolic transfer of political authority — a way of asserting that power and legitimacy stem from one’s family roots. By emphasizing his own revolutionary heritage, the CCP under Xi is re-centering its historical narrative around him, portraying Xi as the rightful heir to China’s Communist legacy. In essence, this completes a full circle in CCP’s political evolution: revolutionary bloodline → family legacy → personal rule. In this shift, authority moves from institutional legitimacy back to bloodline legitimacy, signaling a regression in China’s political modernization — the emergence, in effect, of a “Xi dynasty.”

NFSC Exclusive: Xi Jinping Is Rewriting China’s Narrative of Power — From the Mao Zedong Era to the Xi Jinping Era. 🔹On September 30, 2025, Xi Jinping paid his annual tribute at the Monument to the People’s Heroes on the eve of China’s National Day (October 1, commemorating the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949), also known as the "Martyrs' Day." September 30, 2014, marked China’s first official Martyrs’ Day, established by Xi shortly after he took power in 2013. It signaled the beginning of his campaign to reshape the Communist Party’s official narrative — its historical legitimacy and political lineage. 🔹The “Magic Staff” as a Metaphor for Power The Monument to the People’s Heroes, built under Mao Zedong’s direction, was regarded by Mao as a giant “magic staff” — symbolizing political power that is both omnipotent and divinely authorized. It also reflects how the Communist leadership has often treated power as both sacred and deeply personal, concentrated in the hands of a single ruler. 🔹 Rewriting History Through “Martyrs of China” and the Monument Under Xi Jinping, greater emphasis has been placed on revolutionary figures such as his father, Xi Zhongxun, and other “Yan’an faction” leaders like Liu Zhidan and Gao Gang — whom Xi regards as key figures who helped Mao Zedong survive the Long March and rebuild the Communist Party. The Long March — a brutal year-long retreat in which the Red Army was defeated and scattered by Nationalist forces — left only a few thousand survivors. Mao and his followers eventually reached Yan’an, a remote city in northwest China’s Shaanxi Province, which became the CCP’s headquarters from 1935 to 1948 and the cradle of its revolutionary identity. By elevating these figures, whom he honors as “Martyrs of China,” and linking them to his own family, Xi signals a “return to ancestral roots.” This reframing subtly strips away Mao’s central role in the Party’s revolutionary narrative, repositioning legitimacy within Xi’s own lineage and the Yan’an tradition. In doing so, Xi is reconstructing Party history to elevate his family’s legacy and revive a form of bloodline-based political legitimacy that ties authority to heritage rather than ideology. 🔹 The September Changchun Airshow: Youth and Loyalty The recent Changchun Airshow offers a clear example of Xi Jinping’s effort to cultivate a new generation of loyalists within China’s military and state apparatus. Participation was tightly controlled and limited to individuals aligned with Xi, with nearly all the pilots, staff, and journalists under the age of thirty. This was more than a public military exhibition — it was a symbolic exercise in political loyalty and generational renewal. By elevating young soldiers, performers, and media figures to the forefront, Xi signaled his intention to build a political base that is both younger and personally devoted to him. The move recalls Mao Zedong’s mobilization of youth during the Cultural Revolution, when students served as “Red Guards” to enforce revolutionary fervor and ideological purity. The message is clear: replace the older cadres with a new generation whose careers and loyalties are tied directly to Xi — reinforcing an increasingly centralized and personalized system of power. 🔹 Upholding Mao to Defeat Mao On the surface, Xi Jinping appears to honor Mao Zedong as the founding hero of the Communist Party. But in reality, his strategy is more calculated: he uses Mao’s image and authority to reject Mao’s ideas, legitimizing his own rule and concentrating power in his hands. It is one of Xi’s most skillful political maneuvers — using the aura of an old symbol to construct a new form of rule. 🔹 The Symbolism of “Returning to the Ancestral Line” “Returning to the Ancestral Line” refers to a symbolic transfer of political authority — a way of asserting that power and legitimacy stem from one’s family roots. By emphasizing his own revolutionary heritage, the CCP under Xi is re-centering its historical narrative around him, portraying Xi as the rightful heir to China’s Communist legacy. In essence, this completes a full circle in CCP’s political evolution: revolutionary bloodline → family legacy → personal rule. In this shift, authority moves from institutional legitimacy back to bloodline legitimacy, signaling a regression in China’s political modernization — the emergence, in effect, of a “Xi dynasty.”

NFSC Speaks

27,112 次观看 • 11 个月前