ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

๐…๐š๐›๐ฎ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐’๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ” ๐„๐ฉ๐ข๐ฌ๐จ๐๐ž ๐Ÿ“ ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ: A thousand-year-old snake gall, delivered right to the door. Fabulous Beasts updates every Wednesday at 10 a.m (GMT+8) #ๆœ‰ๅ…ฝ็„‰ #FabulousBeasts #animation #fyp #donghua #bilibili

11,039 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

2 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

9nine ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
9nine1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

nonooNONO i want it NOW

Kitkat ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Kitkat1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

@b0nette_ Opportunity :0

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

Senator Tim Scott was visibly emotional on CNN as he remembered his friend and fellow South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham. SCOTT: โ€œWell, Jake, gosh, Americaโ€™s lost a true statesman.โ€ โ€œWe donโ€™t have many left. But he was a true statesman.โ€ โ€œBut Iโ€™ve lost a friend. It is a morning of mourning for me.โ€ โ€œItโ€™s a powerful reminder that life is fleeting, that we are not here very long.โ€ โ€œIf I were to tell stories about Lindsey Graham, one of the most important stories is that when I was a new senator, he welcomed me in.โ€ โ€œHe knew that my path was different. He understood the power of change in South Carolina and how much our state had changed. But he was one of the first folks in the Senate to welcome me in with open arms.โ€ โ€œAnd I will say that I do a South Carolina Prayer Breakfast every year in D.C. And I called Lindsey the first time, and Lindsey said, โ€˜Tim, if this thing starts before 10 A.M., Iโ€™m not coming because Iโ€™m not goingโ€”even if Jesus comes back before 10 A.M.โ€™โ€ โ€œAnd I just laughed out loud. And of course, it started at 8:30. And who walked in the door at 8:31? Lindsey Graham.โ€ โ€œHe was just the kind of committed person that you donโ€™t really appreciate how committed he was to America.โ€ โ€œI canโ€™t think of a more committed public servant to this country.โ€

Overton

190,524 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Made with seedance 2.5 Prompt ๐Ÿ‘‡ Create a high-quality vertical 9:16 3D animated educational kids video in a bright, colorful, cute nursery-rhyme style. Main character: A cute adorable toddler boy, around 2 years old, with chubby cheeks, big expressive eyes, short light-brown hair, wearing a bright blue T-shirt with a playful โ€œLOL Kidsโ€ style graphic and matching diaper/shorts. Keep the childโ€™s appearance consistent throughout the entire video. Environment: A clean, bright indoor children's learning room with a glossy white floor, colorful geometric shapes scattered around the background, playful decorations, and a series of colorful doors. Use vibrant red, blue, yellow and green doors. Soft studio lighting, cheerful atmosphere, polished 3D cartoon animation, smooth reflections, high-quality Pixar-like children's animation aesthetic. VIDEO SEQUENCE: Scene 1 โ€” A for Apple: The toddler stands in front of a bright red door with a large bold yellow letter โ€œAโ€ on it. He reaches toward the door handle and opens the door with excitement. Behind the door is a colorful apple-themed environment with red apples. Show the text โ€œA - APPLEโ€ at the top. The child looks surprised and happy. Scene 2 โ€” B for Banana: Cut to a bright blue door with a large yellow โ€œBโ€. The toddler walks toward it, reaches for the handle and opens the door. Reveal a playful collection of bright yellow bananas behind the door. Display โ€œB - BANANAโ€ at the top. Scene 3 โ€” C for Cat: Show a yellow/orange door with a large red โ€œCโ€. The toddler opens the door and a cute friendly cat appears behind it. The child reacts with excitement and curiosity. Display โ€œC - CATโ€. Scene 4 โ€” D for Dog: Show a red door with a large yellow โ€œDโ€. The toddler opens it and reveal a cute friendly brown-and-white puppy standing behind the door. The puppy happily looks toward the child. Display โ€œD - DOGโ€. Scene 5 โ€” E for Elephant: Show a blue door with a large yellow โ€œEโ€. The toddler opens the door and a cute baby elephant appears. The elephant playfully raises its trunk while the child reacts happily. Display โ€œE - ELEPHANTโ€. Scene 6 โ€” F for Fish: Transition to a bright underwater-themed aquarium area. Show colorful orange fish swimming inside a large glass aquarium. The toddler stands beside it and looks excitedly at the fish. Display โ€œF - FISHโ€. Scene 7 โ€” G for Grapes: Show a green door with a large yellow โ€œGโ€. The toddler opens the door and discovers a huge bunch of shiny purple grapes behind it. He points toward the grapes with excitement. Display โ€œG - GRAPESโ€. Scene 8 โ€” I for Ice: Show a red door with a large yellow โ€œIโ€. The toddler stands beside the closed door, reaches for the handle and opens it. Reveal a playful icy environment. Display โ€œI - ICEโ€. Scene 9 โ€” J for Jelly: Show a blue door with a large yellow โ€œJโ€. The toddler opens the door and reveal colorful jelly/jelly dessert behind it. The child points toward it happily. Display โ€œJ - JELLYโ€. Scene 10 โ€” K for Kite: Show a red door with a large yellow โ€œKโ€. The toddler opens the door and reveal a colorful kite-themed scene. Display โ€œK - KITEโ€. Scene 11 โ€” L for Lion: Show a green door with a large yellow โ€œLโ€. The toddler opens the door and a cute friendly cartoon lion appears behind it. The lion looks gentle and playful, not scary. The toddler reacts with excitement. Display โ€œL - LIONโ€. Final scene: Show a cute fluffy hamster waving goodbye to the camera in a bright pastel background. Add cheerful text: โ€œBye-Bye ๐Ÿ‘‹โ€ and a colorful kids-learning logo at the bottom. Animation and camera: Smooth toddler walking and reaching movements, natural hand interaction with every door handle, realistic door opening motion, expressive facial reactions, playful character animation, gentle camera movements, medium full-body framing, occasional slow push-ins, clean transitions between alphabet scenes, consistent character proportions, bright cinematic lighting, glossy 3D rendering, vibrant colors, soft shadows, highly detailed children'

Zarnab Ai

100,236 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ๅคฉๅ‰

Elon just confirmed how long every working human has left before the robots take over. "AI will probably increase the global economy by 20 to 30%. That's my rough estimate. Meaning, on the order of 20 to 30 trillion per year." So that's a second United States economy appearing out of thin air, EVERY single year. And Elon's whole point is that the machines produce it, not the people. He even gave us the exact date for the digital half: "AI will be able to do anything digital, anything that does not require the shaping of atoms by hand, by the end of next year." By the end of next year... And on software specifically: "It's going to be impossible for a human to compete in writing software with AI." So every coder, every analyst, every job that lives on a screen is on a 12 to 18 month timer, straight from the richest man alive. But that's only the part that runs on electricity. And this is where it gets crazy... "There will be at least a billion robots in 10 years, and each will produce at least five times the output of a human." "The billion humanoid robots will be more productive than all humans combined." A billion machines, out-working ALL 8 billion of us. And he put a deadline on it: 10 years. And he even called that estimate small. So the version where robots out-produce the entire human race is the number he treats as safe. He said he'd bet serious money on it. But how does a billion of anything get built that fast? Robots building robots building robots. It starts slow and then it goes vertical. Thatโ€™s how a few thousand becomes a billion. Elon also explained his own formula for how useful a robot actually is. He said it's the quality of the AI software, times the quality of the AI chip, times the dexterity of the hands. Software and chips are the exact things Elon and Nvidia have spent a decade making exponential. The third one is the hand. And the hand is the thing robotics has been stuck on for 40 years. A machine can crush the best human alive at chess and still can't pick a strange object off a messy table the way a toddler can. Grip, pressure, touch, knowing how hard to squeeze. That problem has barely moved while everything digital went vertical. The thing he named as the hard part is the exact thing his whole 10 year number depends on. So it all comes down to one variable, and it's the slowest-moving one in the entire machine: The robot hand. The brain is basically solved. The fingers have to catch up to it this decade, at planetary scale. Now to be fair, this is also where the most money on Earth is pointed right now. Tesla and a dozen others are throwing everything at exactly this problem. Elon's software calls tend to land but his atoms calls tend to fail. Because anything physical always takes longer than anything digital. He's also made this exact robot call before with wildly different numbers, 10 billion of them by 2040 in one speech, five per human in another. So here's the real question: Do you believe robot hands get solved inside 10 years? Because that one bet is the core of Elonโ€˜s prediction. Everything else already came true.

Ricardo

450,806 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

OpenAI just told you the top is in, and they're HIDING it behind an AI safety lie. Sam Altman confirmed they won't go public in 2026. A listing that was being lined up at up to $1 trillion, suddenly pushed out to 2027. Altman called going public right now "ill-advised," and blamed it on AI safety. SPARE ME THE SAFETY EXCUSE OpenAI raised money privately at an $852 billion valuation earlier this year, its most senior people are walking out the door, and Anthropic, its single closest rival, is sprinting to go public before the midterms at north of $2 trillion. A company that truly believed it was building something too dangerous to sell to the public wouldn't be racing to sell shares to the public, and the rival sitting right next to it wouldn't be either. The safety story does not survive 5 seconds of scrutiny. So let me tell you what this really is, because we've built this exact machine once before and it didn't end well: The best breakdown of what's happening here came from Jay Martin, a commodities investor who traced the whole thing back to 2006. He talked about this a month ago and everything's turning out to be true. Everybody points to 2008, the year Lehman fell and Washington started rescuing banks, but by the time those headlines landed the outcome was already decided. The year that settled it was 2006, and in 2006 every front page told you housing had never looked healthier. What almost everyone missed was how those mortgages actually worked. The people writing them never expected to get paid back, because the entire plan was to keep rolling them over. A risky borrower paid a low teaser rate for 2 years, then refinanced against a higher home value and restarted the same 2 year clock. The whole arrangement leaned on a single requirement that had nothing to do with how many people wanted houses: It needed acceleration. Prices had to keep climbing faster every single year or the whole thing breaks. And in 2006 home prices never fell. They just slowed from rising 15% a year to rising 8%, and that alone was enough to bring the entire structure down. A homeowner whose house gained 8% could no longer pull enough equity out to replace the old loan, so the refinancing ladder broke and borrowers began defaulting in record numbers with prices still near their all-time peak. The crash in prices was only the echo, and it didn't arrive for another year. The panic took two. What you have to understand here: The loans broke the moment price growth merely slowed, long before prices themselves ever fell. Now look at OpenAI through that exact lens. It's never turned a profit and it loses tens of billions of dollars a year. It covers yesterday's bills by raising fresh money at a higher valuation, which is precisely what that subprime borrower did every time he refinanced against a bigger appraisal. Every round OpenAI raised from 2024 through 2025 came in somewhere between 1.7 and 1.9 times the size of the one before it. For a company bleeding this much cash, that ever-climbing valuation is the fuel, and it works right up until the number stops climbing. The IPO was supposed to be the next rung on that ladder. At $1 trillion it would've been a step of barely 1.2 times the last private round, the smallest jump in the company's entire life, and it was being teed up at the exact moment cheap Chinese models are dragging down what the American labs can charge for the same work. And this weekend OpenAI refused to take even that shrunken step. That's the sound of the acceleration stalling, and it's the same sound 2006 made before everything went downhill. Roughly 40% of the S&P 500 now sits inside just 10 companies. If your retirement is in an index fund, you aren't spread safely across 500 businesses. Nearly half of your money is riding on one belief holding together, the belief that these AI companies will somehow grow into valuations that have never ONCE made sense, before the acceleration gives out underneath them.

George Noble

24,549 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 23 ๅคฉๅ‰

How to destroy a booming market. A short post ft. the Haryana excise department. The video is of Sector 29 on a Sunday evening. Shutters down. Shops sitting with no tenants. Half of them had not even bothered to open. This is the same market that once ran a parking mafia. Tickets of 50, 100, sometimes more, just to park. Cars crawling all night. You could not get in. I stood there this Sunday and there was nothing. 10 percent of the old crowd, maybe less. A few years ago this place did not feel like India. At night the whole market was shining. Music, lights, people everywhere, that feeling of standing somewhere abroad for a few hours. Today it is quiet and in shambles. Everyone will tell you the towing killed it. GMDA lifted thousands of cars, Sector 29 topped the list, people got scared and stopped coming. That scared some of them off. The market was already bleeding from somewhere else. That somewhere else opened right next door, with a friendly name. BYOB. Bring your own booze. Sounds like freedom. Except you cannot bring your own booze. A friend lands from abroad, hands you a bottle of scotch from duty free, and they stop you at the door. You get in only if you buy the liquor from their shop. The one attached to the place. So the name is a lie. It is a liquor shop wearing a restaurant costume. Now look at what the licensed bars were carrying. Haryana raises the bar license fee almost every year. A proper brewery or bar in Sector 29 pays that every single year before it pours one glass. The BYOB next door pays none of it. No license. No excise weight. And it still charges food prices as high as the bar it is busy killing. Here is the part that should end the argument. Around 2 years ago some of these BYOB spots quietly built a mezzanine floor over the ground seating to double the covers. No fire safety. No clearance worth the name. The places breaking every rule got bigger. The places following every rule shut down. The mezzanines were pulled later, but by then the crowd had already moved. And the young crowd never cared about any of this. The BYOBs stay open till 4 in the morning. Live music, belly dance, theme nights, pool parties. Sector 29 with its licenses and its rules and its closing time could not fight a format that had no rules to begin with. Then look at the real estate. Around 3 years ago an SCO here was touching 50 CR. Today those same units are hard to sell. The rent is so high that nobody can run a business that covers it, so the shutter just stays down. The demand is still there. It just walked next door, to the cheaper version with no license and no rules. That is how you destroy a booming market. You charge the ones who follow the law every single year, you leave the ones who break it completely free, and then you act surprised when the lawful ones are the first to die.

Abhishek Bhardwaj

243,494 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

๐Ÿšจ#BREAKING: A mother is FURIOUS after a Pennsylvania town CRIMINALLY CHARGED her two little girls, ages 10 and 12, and dragged them into court... ...because a playground swing broke while they were spinning on it. Yes, you read that right. The two girls twisted the chains to get dizzy, the chain snapped, and the borough's response was CRIMINAL MSCHIEF CHARGES for a 10-year-old. This is Springdale, Pennsylvania, just outside Pittsburgh. On May 21st, a group of kids were playing at Veterans Memorial Park where two sat on the swing and the others twisted the chains up tight and let go, so the swing would spin them dizzy. Every one of us did this as a kid... hundreds of times. The chain broke. Nobody was hurt. Two weeks later, a POLICE OFFICER showed up at Katie Huss's front door with SURVEILLANCE PHOTOS of the children on a swing. The borough had split the repair bill among five kids. $59 dollars each. Three families paid up and their kids' charges disappeared. Katie demanded more information: "Show me the evidence my daughters did this on purpose and show me the swing was even inspected prior to this occuring." She didn't pay and so her 10 and 12-year-old daughters were CHARGED WITH A CRIME. Criminal mischief. BY the way... under Pennsylvania's criminal code, that is a charge that requires INTENT. The two little girls were terrified and had to sit in a courtroom while a police officer testified against them for "not using the swing properly." Thankfully, the judge threw it out and found them not guilty. It was CLEARLY an accident, not a crime. ...you would think it would end there, but it doesn't!!! The borough is now threatening to sue this mother in CIVIL court over $180. And Katie still hasn't been allowed to see the video they used against her children, it was shown to the lawyers, but not to the mom. Nearly every single day, violent repeat offenders WALK OUT OF JAIL ALL THE TIME to prey on innocent people... ...but INSTEAD of dealing with that, we have built a system that lets predators go and prosecutes children for playing AT A PARK USING SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE TO WATCH THEM America, we have LOST THE FREAKING PLOT!!!!

Matt Van Swol

1,769,840 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰