Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐—”๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฌ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ. ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜†. ๐—ก๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜. Text. Image. Video. One model series. We built Agnes-2.0 for the developers who got priced out โ€” high token costs, API limits, geography. That ends today. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ: โ†’ ๐—”๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€-๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฌ-๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต โ€” text and agentic, top 10 on Claw-Eval, ahead of Gemini and...

3,526,144 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Monaten โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

[CLIP] by Hand โœ๏ธ The CLIP (Contrastive Languageโ€“Image Pre-training) model, a groundbreaking work by OpenAI, redefines the intersection of computer vision and natural language processing. It is the basis of all the multi-modal foundation models we see today. How does CLIP work? Goal: ๐ŸŸจ Learn a shared embedding space for text and image [1] Given โ†ณ A mini batch of 3 text-image pairs โ†ณ OpenAI used 400 million text-image pairs to train its original CLIP model. Process 1st pair: "big table" [2] ๐ŸŸช Text โ†’ 2 Vectors (3D) โ†ณ Look up word embedding vectors using word2vec. [3] ๐ŸŸฉ Image โ†’ 2 Vectors (4D) โ†ณ Divide the image into two patches. โ†ณ Flatten each patch [4] Process other pairs โ†ณ Repeat [2]-[3] [5] ๐ŸŸช Text Encoder & ๐ŸŸฉ Image Encoder โ†ณ Encode input vectors into feature vectors โ†ณ Here, both encoders are simple one layer perceptron (linear + ReLU) โ†ณ In practice, the encoders are usually transformer models. [6] ๐ŸŸช ๐ŸŸฉ Mean Pooling: 2 โ†’ 1 vector โ†ณ Average 2 feature vectors into a single vector by averaging across the columns โ†ณ The goal is to have one vector to represent each image or text [7] ๐ŸŸช ๐ŸŸฉ -> ๐ŸŸจ Projection โ†ณ Note that the text and image feature vectors from the encoders have different dimensions (3D vs. 4D). โ†ณ Use a linear layer to project image and text vectors to a 2D shared embedding space. ๐Ÿ‹๏ธ Contrastive Pre-training ๐Ÿ‹๏ธ [8] Prepare for MatMul โ†ณ Copy text vectors (T1,T2,T3) โ†ณ Copy the transpose of image vectors (I1,I2,I3) โ†ณ They are all in the 2D shared embedding space. [9] ๐ŸŸฆ MatMul โ†ณ Multiply T and I matrices. โ†ณ This is equivalent to taking dot product between every pair of image and text vectors. โ†ณ The purpose is to use dot product to estimate the similarity between a pair of image-text. [10] ๐ŸŸฆ Softmax: e^x โ†ณ Raise e to the power of the number in each cell โ†ณ To simplify hand calculation, we approximate e^โ–ก with 3^โ–ก. [11] ๐ŸŸฆ Softmax: โˆ‘ โ†ณ Sum each row for ๐ŸŸฉ imageโ†’๐ŸŸช text โ†ณ Sum each column for ๐ŸŸช textโ†’ ๐ŸŸฉ image [12] ๐ŸŸฆ Softmax: 1 / sum โ†ณ Divide each element by the column sum to obtain a similarity matrix for ๐ŸŸช textโ†’๐ŸŸฉ image โ†ณ Divide each element by the row sum to obtain a similarity matrix for ๐ŸŸฉ imageโ†’๐ŸŸช text [13] ๐ŸŸฅ Loss Gradients โ†ณ The "Targets" for the similarity matrices are Identity Matrices. โ†ณ Why? If I and T come from the same pair (i=j), we want the highest value, which is 1, and 0 otherwise. โ†ณ Apply the simple equation of [Similarity - Target] to compute gradients of for both directions. โ†ณ Why so simple? Because when Softmax and Cross-Entropy Loss are used together, the math magically works out that way. โ†ณ These gradients kick off the backpropagation process to update weights and biases of the encoders and projection layers (red borders).

Tom Yeh

67,892 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

CLIP by hand โœ๏ธ ~ 13 steps walkthrough below CLIP, Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training, is OpenAI's answer to a question that sounds impossible: how do you put a sentence and a picture in the same space? CLIP shipped when OpenAI was still open, and those embeddings were shared far and wide. Almost every multimodal model you use today descends from them. How does it work? Goal: learn one shared embedding space for text and images. = 1. Given = A mini batch of three text-image pairs. OpenAI trained the original on 400 million. = 2. Text to vectors = Let us look up each word with word2vec. = 3. Image to vectors = We cut each image into two patches and flatten them. Now text and pixels are both just numbers. = 4. The other pairs = Repeat steps 2 and 3 for the rest of the batch. = 5. Encode = Let us push both sides through their encoders, a linear layer and a ReLU. In practice these are transformers, but the shape of the operation is the same. = 6. Mean pooling = We average across the columns, so each image and each sentence collapses to a single vector. = 7. Projection = The text vectors are 3D and the image vectors are 4D, so they cannot be compared at all. A linear layer projects both to 2D. That 2D space is the shared embedding space, and getting here is the whole point of the model. = 8. Prepare for matmul = Let us copy the text vectors down and the transposed image vectors across. = 9. MatMul = We multiply, which takes the dot product of every text vector with every image vector. Each cell is one estimate of how well a sentence matches a picture. = 10. Softmax, e to the power = Raise e to each cell. To keep it hand sized we approximate e with 3. = 11. Softmax, sum = Sum each row for image to text, each column for text to image. = 12. Softmax, normalize = Divide, and out come two similarity matrices, one per direction. = 13. Loss gradients = The targets are identity matrices: a pair that belongs together should score 1, every other cell 0. Subtract the target from the similarity and you have the gradients, in both directions. The takeaway: pairing a picture with a sentence comes down to a single dot product. Everything before step 9 is the work of getting them into one shared space, so that the dot product finally means something. ๐Ÿ’พ Save this post!

Tom Yeh

20,750 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat

๐ŸŽฅ Today weโ€™re premiering Meta Movie Gen: the most advanced media foundation models to-date. Developed by AI research teams at Meta, Movie Gen delivers state-of-the-art results across a range of capabilities. Weโ€™re excited for the potential of this line of research to usher in entirely new possibilities for casual creators and creative professionals alike. More details and examples of what Movie Gen can do โžก๏ธ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Movie Gen models and capabilities Movie Gen Video: 30B parameter transformer model that can generate high-quality and high-definition images and videos from a single text prompt. Movie Gen Audio: A 13B parameter transformer model that can take a video input along with optional text prompts for controllability to generate high-fidelity audio synced to the video. It can generate ambient sound, instrumental background music and foley sound โ€” delivering state-of-the-art results in audio quality, video-to-audio alignment and text-to-audio alignment. Precise video editing: Using a generated or existing video and accompanying text instructions as an input it can perform localized edits such as adding, removing or replacing elements โ€” or global changes like background or style changes. Personalized videos: Using an image of a person and a text prompt, the model can generate a video with state-of-the-art results on character preservation and natural movement in video. Weโ€™re continuing to work closely with creative professionals from across the field to integrate their feedback as we work towards a potential release. We look forward to sharing more on this work and the creative possibilities it will enable in the future.

AI at Meta

2,266,357 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

This is probably the most complex workflow Iโ€™ve ever built, only with open-source tools. It took my 4 days. It takes four inputs: author, title, and style; and generates a full visual animated story in one click in ComfyUI . I worked on it for four days. There are still some bugs, but hereโ€™s the first preview. Hereโ€™s a quick breakdown: - The four inputs are sent to LLMs with precise instructions to generate: first, prompts for images and image modifications; second, prompts for animations; third, prompts for generating music. - All voices are generated from the text and timed precisely, as they determine the length of each animation segment. - The first image and video are generated to serve as the title, but also as the guide for all other images created for the video. - Titles and subtitles are also added automatically in Comfy. - I also developed a lot of custom nodes for minor frame calculations, mostly to match audio and video. - The full system is a large loop that, for each line of text, generates an image and then a video from that image. The loop was the hardest part to build in this workflow, so it can process either a 20-second video or a 2-minute video with the same input. - There are multiple combinations of LLMs that try to understand the text in the best way to provide the best prompts for images and video. - The final video is assembled entirely within ComfyUI. - The music is generated based on the LLM output and matches the exact timing of the full animation. - Done! For reference, this workflow uses a lot of models and only works on an RTX 6000 Pro with plenty of RAM. My goal is not to replace humans, as Iโ€™ll try to explain later, this workflow is highly controlled and can be adapted or reworked at any point by real artists! My aim was to create a tool that can animate text in one go, allowing the AI some freedom while keeping a strict flow. I donโ€™t know yet how Iโ€™ll share this workflow with people, I still need to polish it properly, but maybe through Patreon. Anyway, I hope you enjoy my research, and letโ€™s always keep pushing further! :)

Lovis Odin

58,841 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 11 Monaten

AI has transformed how video is created. We think the next wave is about understanding it. Over the past few years, we've seen remarkable advances in video generation, editing, avatars, and creative tooling. An increasingly important problem is teaching machines to search, analyze, reason over, and extract insight from video - across massive libraries and live streams alike. We're calling this video intelligence, and we're actively looking to back founders building here. We're most excited about companies pushing on the core capabilities: - Video-native models - multimodal embeddings, temporal reasoning, and retrieval built specifically for video rather than adapted from image or text - Real-time and large-scale pipelines - infrastructure for processing, indexing, and querying video at the speed and scale enterprises actually need - Agentic and reasoning layers - systems that don't just retrieve clips but answer questions, surface anomalies, and take action on what they see The models and infrastructure to make this real are appearing to be crossing a capability threshold right now. Multimodal foundation models are maturing, storage costs have collapsed, and enterprises are sitting on years of unstructured video with no way to use it. That infrastructure unlocks a wide range of applications including media and sports workflows, security and physical operations, enterprise knowledge management, advertising analytics, robotics, and consumer products, where video has historically been dark data. If you're building in video intelligence at the model layer, the platform layer, or in a vertical application, we'd love to talk!

Jason Cui

36,205 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 4 Monaten

Chinese AI models are wiping billions off Big Tech right now. Google just lost $200 billion in a single day, and the model it needed to fight back still isn't ready. Gemini 3.5 Pro, Google's most powerful model, is months behind schedule. Alphabet stock dropped 4.4% that same day. The Deepseek moment is happening again, and the new model is FAR bigger. On the same day Google's delay leaked, a Beijing lab called Moonshot released Kimi K3. It is the largest open model ever built, with 2.8 trillion parameters. It took the number one spot on the Frontend Code Arena, a live coding leaderboard, passing Anthropic's best model. And Moonshot is giving it away for free on July 27. The genius part: Anyone with enough computers can download it and run a frontier level AI without paying a cent to a US company. A single task on Kimi K3 costs about 94 cents. The same work on some American models costs nearly double. So why would a company keep paying premium prices for a model it can now get for free? The entire US AI business is built on selling access to models that cost billions to train. If a free Chinese version does most of the same work, that pricing power starts to crack. And Kimi is close to the best. On one closely watched intelligence ranking it scored 57, just behind the top American models GPT-5.6 Sol and Fable 5, and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8. Bank of America told clients that Kimi proves Chinese labs can keep making big leaps even with limited chips. And the founder of Moonshot, Yang Zhilin, learned to build AI as a researcher INSIDE Google. Google literally wrote the 2017 paper that made all of these models possible. Now the people who studied its work are using it to destroy Google, and handing it out for free. What happens next: Kimi K3's weights go public on July 27. Google reports earnings on July 22, and everyone will be asking the same question about Gemini. If free models keep topping the charts, every valuation built on paid AI access has to be rewritten. What do you think?

Ricardo

47,790 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat

Just how capable are open source models? Below is the first in a new series where we go behind the scenes and pull back the curtain on interesting AI research / demos, making them fun and easy to understand. Here, we have a short visual demonstration from aizk ๎จ€โœก๏ธ showcasing how Kimi K3 (a language model that operates primarily through text) is capable of building complicated 3D structures / moments in history in Minecraft, something that previously was not possible with other open source models, and why this matters. The crazy part? The model doesn't "see" the game like we do. The LLMs must reason in pure text, writing JavaScript, that later compiles down into commands placing each block, one at a time. Spatial reasoning is a very hard problem in AI, it's the same core challenge behind robotics and self-driving cars, where a model has to understand and act in physical 3D space. Watching a text model pull it off is nothing short of a miracle. The point isn't just Minecraft itself, rather, it's AI being able to generalize, not memorize, on things that are weird and beyond their training data. This is key to building true artificial general intelligence. These video game benchmarks (there are many different games actively being researched right now) provide a clear-cut end goal, challenges that are almost certainly not in the training set, and a fun, very fast, visual way to almost feel the increasing capabilities of various open source AI models over time. If you haven't given open source models a serious try yet, watch the video, it may shock you!

Featherless AI

39,769 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 23 Tagen

OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor talks to about 100 CEOs every month. His answer to the cheap open-weight model panic: cheaper to train does not mean cheaper to use, and the number that decides it is token efficiency. "One thing that I think is a little bit overblown about these open weight models is they're not necessarily cheaper to run. Whether or not they're cheaper to train, you don't care. Because you're using just as many tokens. In fact, they may be less efficient." "There's this thing called token efficiency. And it turns out the frontier models are much, much more token efficient." "A token is to intelligence like a watt is to electricity... how many tokens does it take to complete a task? Not every token is actually equal." "For a lot of tasks, it turns out these frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic are actually just better than these open weight models... just having open weights isn't actually the main thing driving any of those costs." Later in the same interview he goes after the billing unit itself: "It would be like if you signed up for Gmail and you paid for CPU cycle or something... where the world is going is paying for outcomes." The unresolved column: the chart CNBC airs mid-answer, from Artificial Analysis, prices a completed task at $0.94 on Kimi K3 against $2.75 on Claude Fable 5, efficiency folded in. If that gap holds, the premium he is defending gets earned on quality, not price. - Bret Taylor (Bret Taylor), OpenAI chairman and Sierra co-founder, on CNBC's Squawk Box.

Karl Mehta

17,254 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat