正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 + 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 🫡 Ohio State Baseball Assistant Head Coach / Pitching Coach Tyler Robinson breaks down the new facility upgrades at Bill Davis Stadium 👍 He explains how they've integrated elite tech into player development while avoiding the "paralysis by analysis" trap 📊 Full Episode 🔗: | Shooter Hunt

Prep Baseball

200,390 subscribers

35,314 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"I think the 𝙈𝙊𝙎𝙏 𝙄𝙈𝙋𝙊𝙍𝙏𝘼𝙉𝙏 thing that a young player could hear is ..." Auburn Baseball Associate Head Coach & Recruiting Coordinator Karl Nonemaker offers an inside look at how the recruiting process operates 👀 Full Episode 🔗: | Prep Baseball Alabama | Shooter Hunt

"I think the 𝙈𝙊𝙎𝙏 𝙄𝙈𝙋𝙊𝙍𝙏𝘼𝙉𝙏 thing that a young player could hear is ..." Auburn Baseball Associate Head Coach & Recruiting Coordinator Karl Nonemaker offers an inside look at how the recruiting process operates 👀 Full Episode 🔗: | Prep Baseball Alabama | Shooter Hunt

Prep Baseball

14,786 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨MUST WATCH: An ANGRY Candace Owens Sets The Recod Straight And CALLS OUT All Those Parroting The LIES About Tyler Robinson Turning Himself In And Confessing🤬🔥 Candace Owens just systematically dismantled the entire establishment narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson on her podcast, and it is absolutely infuriating how many people are still parroting these lies. If you still believe Tyler Robinson "turned himself in" or "confessed" to shooting Charlie Kirk, you have been severely manipulated by the Feds. Candace just set the record straight, and here are the undeniable facts: LIE #1: TYLER CONFESSED AND TURNED HIMSELF IN This never happened. If you walk into a police station and confess to a high-profile assassination, the very first thing they do is make you sign a sworn, written confession. No such document exists. Tyler Robinson has maintained his innocence from day one and has officially plead NOT GUILTY. LIE #2: HIS DAD TURNED HIM IN Another complete fabrication. Tyler's father never claimed his son was the shooter. In fact, sources close to the family confirm his father explicitly stated that the blurry surveillance footage of the shooter on the stairs did not look like Tyler (and let’s be honest, we all know it looked exactly like Robbie Hill). LIE #3: TYLER WAS SUICIDAL This was a narrative planted to make him look unstable and guilty. So, how did Tyler actually end up at the station? Enter Mike Mitchell, a former sheriff's deputy with a highly suspicious background who happened to be Tyler's old Boy Scout leader. Mitchell went to Tyler’s house and essentially threatened him: He told Tyler the Feds were going to raid his house with a SWAT team, put guns in his parents' faces, and likely shoot him dead unless he came down to the station "peacefully" to clear his name. Tyler went to the station because he was terrified of being murdered by the state, not because he was guilty. THE FED COVER-UP: The local police, the SWAT teams, and the Washington County sheriffs all know the Feds set Tyler up as a patsy. The Feds lied about the gun location. They kept bomb-sniffing dogs away from specific areas. And who was the one aggressively pushing the fake "confession" narrative to the public? Governor Spencer Cox and Kash Patel. They stood on stage, repeated the Masonic "33" signaling, and lied to the American people to shut down the investigation. Candace said it best: She is 99.9% sure Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Kirk. The people pushing this narrative are protecting the real killers, and they are doing it for money. We are not going to let them railroad an innocent kid to protect the deep state. 🛡️👺 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked down below.👇

Project Constitution

110,416 次观看 • 4 个月前

We sat down with two brothers living the new reality of college football. One is at Ohio State. One is at Georgia… and they’re getting paid. But the money part isn’t the full story — and Luke Montgomery and Ryan Montgomery share that story with tremendous depth. What stuck with me from our conversation was what happens when you’re 17 and the world starts treating you like a business. Who do you trust? How do you not get played? How do you build the right circle before the wrong people build it for you? If you’re an athlete, a parent, a coach, or you’re just trying to understand what NIL actually changed behind the scenes… this one’s for you. Watch the latest Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth episode as it is fueled by our founding sponsor 76 — keeping you on the GO GO GO so you never miss a beat. Be sure to visit Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth and check out the full episode on YouTube 🔗👇

We sat down with two brothers living the new reality of college football. One is at Ohio State. One is at Georgia… and they’re getting paid. But the money part isn’t the full story — and Luke Montgomery and Ryan Montgomery share that story with tremendous depth. What stuck with me from our conversation was what happens when you’re 17 and the world starts treating you like a business. Who do you trust? How do you not get played? How do you build the right circle before the wrong people build it for you? If you’re an athlete, a parent, a coach, or you’re just trying to understand what NIL actually changed behind the scenes… this one’s for you. Watch the latest Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth episode as it is fueled by our founding sponsor 76 — keeping you on the GO GO GO so you never miss a beat. Be sure to visit Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth and check out the full episode on YouTube 🔗👇

Yogi Roth

37,176 次观看 • 3 个月前

Message to Matt Quintanar, the player who slid into Aidan Meola & Texas Tech baseball (Texas Tech Baseball) as a program. Let me preface this post with some evidence of the "respect" I have had for the Texas Tech baseball program. That program has always had a "West Texas" wild & craziness/EDGE, that, TBH, I've been jealous of at times. Don't believe those words, see for yourself where at least this 1 person is coming from. I've had the opportunity to interview multiple former Red Raiders who are still playing/pitching professional baseball. Clayton Beeter Ryan Sublette Also, Kyle Robinson is still one of my favorite pitchers I've EVER watched pitch at O'Brate, and I've communicated with him, even since he's been a pro, when he was playing in Tulsa last June with Midland at the AA level. And, Matt Gardner, the former Texas Tech pitching coach, pitched at OSU, and Geoff Haxton, your PxP, grew up in Stillwater, and we are personal friends. So, I respect Tech and enjoy the rivalry. NOW, let's get into the "Nuts & Bolts." There's a difference between playing with an edge and being "dirty". There's a right way to play, and hard slides are a part of it, but that slide was insanely inappropriate, and a VERY bad look all around for an otherwise VERY good player. I honestly didn't have an issue with the chirping, because that, in my view, went two-sided, but the slide was "Busch League". And if you do that in pro ball, completely unprovoked, at least by the player you slid into, you'll only do it once. I'm not telling you anything you don't know because your brother was a pro baseball player, so I'm not reinventing the wheel with that comment. And, YOU played at Blinn, and I KNOW they didn't teach you that, and YOU will, almost assuredly, be a Pro after your time at Tech. I'm about 100% confident in that! That is, unless you don't get THAT act cleaned up. And, maybe the most disappointing part of the whole thing is that the player you slid into is an ELITE human being who has fought through MORE injuries than any College baseball player possibly EVER. And then, you have the piece of it where you actually cost your team, one of the best hitting teams in America, the chance to keep playing and come back to win the game. And, finally, as ANGRY as that play left OSU fans, YOUR OWN teammates, fans & coaches, should have come away from that infinite times more angry than any of us. That's because WE WON THE GAME, and YOU didn't. And, I'll promise you, you WEREN'T going to whip Aidan Meola & Hudson Barrett's ass, hate to break that news to you. And, to read your lips as you walked off the field, yes, that was BS, BS on YOUR part! Hope that sinks in! #gopokes #okstate

Message to Matt Quintanar, the player who slid into Aidan Meola & Texas Tech baseball (Texas Tech Baseball) as a program. Let me preface this post with some evidence of the "respect" I have had for the Texas Tech baseball program. That program has always had a "West Texas" wild & craziness/EDGE, that, TBH, I've been jealous of at times. Don't believe those words, see for yourself where at least this 1 person is coming from. I've had the opportunity to interview multiple former Red Raiders who are still playing/pitching professional baseball. Clayton Beeter Ryan Sublette Also, Kyle Robinson is still one of my favorite pitchers I've EVER watched pitch at O'Brate, and I've communicated with him, even since he's been a pro, when he was playing in Tulsa last June with Midland at the AA level. And, Matt Gardner, the former Texas Tech pitching coach, pitched at OSU, and Geoff Haxton, your PxP, grew up in Stillwater, and we are personal friends. So, I respect Tech and enjoy the rivalry. NOW, let's get into the "Nuts & Bolts." There's a difference between playing with an edge and being "dirty". There's a right way to play, and hard slides are a part of it, but that slide was insanely inappropriate, and a VERY bad look all around for an otherwise VERY good player. I honestly didn't have an issue with the chirping, because that, in my view, went two-sided, but the slide was "Busch League". And if you do that in pro ball, completely unprovoked, at least by the player you slid into, you'll only do it once. I'm not telling you anything you don't know because your brother was a pro baseball player, so I'm not reinventing the wheel with that comment. And, YOU played at Blinn, and I KNOW they didn't teach you that, and YOU will, almost assuredly, be a Pro after your time at Tech. I'm about 100% confident in that! That is, unless you don't get THAT act cleaned up. And, maybe the most disappointing part of the whole thing is that the player you slid into is an ELITE human being who has fought through MORE injuries than any College baseball player possibly EVER. And then, you have the piece of it where you actually cost your team, one of the best hitting teams in America, the chance to keep playing and come back to win the game. And, finally, as ANGRY as that play left OSU fans, YOUR OWN teammates, fans & coaches, should have come away from that infinite times more angry than any of us. That's because WE WON THE GAME, and YOU didn't. And, I'll promise you, you WEREN'T going to whip Aidan Meola & Hudson Barrett's ass, hate to break that news to you. And, to read your lips as you walked off the field, yes, that was BS, BS on YOUR part! Hope that sinks in! #gopokes #okstate

OState Daily

60,595 次观看 • 4 个月前

I watched every SEC Football Media Day press conference so you don’t have to. Here’s the best answer from every head coach: -- LSU Coach Lane Kiffin on why personal growth often comes from subtracting, not constantly adding: “If you really want to keep growing, a lot of people add things as they go versus subtracting things that are issues.” “Once you remove something from your life, you start to realize how many other people are addicted to it or need it.” “To be free of that has been interesting because you don’t compare.” “Social media… makes you compare your job, the city you live in, your vacation, your kids, your clothes, your car, your significant other.” “When you don’t see that all day, you’re free of that comparison.” “It’s been a way of being more present.” — Georgia Coach Kirby Smart explains how leaders should operate when their industry is changing rapidly: “What wins football games has not changed. Each coach has to decide within their own program what they want to major in.” You’ve got to be able to wear multiple hats. But you’ve got to choose which hats you want to wear the best.” “I’m not afraid to change what we need to change to be successful. I don’t have an ego that says you have to do it my way. I want to hear how you want to do it, and let’s find the best way.” — Oklahoma Coach Brent Venables on the player who asked for more money before he had earned a role, and how he responded: “Why don’t you worry about playing first before we worry about incentives?” — Kentucky Coach Will Stein on why he believes Kentucky can overcome its history and win at a championship level: “I think because of me, to be honest.” “I know what it takes. I’ve seen it at the highest levels. You’ve just got to believe. You’ve just got to put the ball down and play.” “The best determination of whether what you’re doing is working is putting the ball down and playing football.” “There are going to be bumps in the road. I’m prepared for tough moments and tough times. I already do self-talk with myself: ‘How can I stay neutral when stuff’s bad?’” “You’ve got to go attack. You can’t sit back and wait.That’s one thing I refuse to do at Kentucky—wait.” — Missouri Coach Eli Drinkwitz explains what Ahmad Hardy’s recovery taught him about the real purpose of coaching: “There was that moment where he realized he was mortal. I’ve been very proud of the way he’s approached his recovery and his rehab. His number one responsibility is to be a father, and then after that, to continue to be a great teammate.” “That’s exactly what coaching is all about. It’s about taking young men on a journey from 18 to maturity—and it’s a lifelong process.” “Regardless of how much the business changes or is disrupted, it’s still about helping players achieve their dreams.” “When Ahmad scores his first touchdown this year, I’ll be thinking about that journey from hospital bed to end zone.” — South Carolina Coach Shane Beamer takes complete ownership of South Carolina’s disappointing season and explains how adversity revealed the strength of the program’s culture: “There was no ceiling on the football program at South Carolina, and nothing has changed. We fell woefully short, and that’s on me. We don’t seek comfort from how close we were.” — Vanderbilt Coach Clark Lea on Vanderbilt’s disastrous 2023 season and explains how it became the turning point that eventually led to a 10-win season: “That’s called getting your ass kicked.” “It may have been the most important thing that’s ever happened to me as a head coach and to the program.” “The vision never left us.” “In 15 years, when I look back on this moment, what am I learning right now—not what am I feeling right now?” — Tennessee Coach Josh Heupel explains how to develop an inexperienced quarterback without coaching away what makes him special: “The players have to go learn it, earn it, and compete for it every single day.” “Each one of them is a little bit different. They’re the artist. You’ve got to hand them the paintbrush and let them go paint it.” — Florida Coach John Sumrall explains the attitude he wants to establish at Florida: “I may have some bad moments. I don’t have bad days.” “Attitude is demeanor, drive and desire. Demeanor is your body language. Your drive and desire is the mindset that you’ve never arrived, you can always get better.” — Texas A&M Coach Mike Elko on how he prevents complacency after a playoff appearance: “I show them our trophy case, and it’s empty.” — Ole Miss Coach Pete Golding explains how he defines an elite program beyond wins and football performance: “Elite programs aren’t designed for when they’ve got cleats on. Elite programs are designed for when they take them cleats off.” “Are they a better dude? Are they a better husband? Are they a better father?” — Auburn Coach Alex Golesh explains where real confidence comes from: “Real confidence, not fake confidence, but real, authentic, genuine confidence, comes from elite-level process day in and day out.” — Arkansas Coach Ryan Silverfield explains why rebuilding Arkansas required examining every detail: “The night I got there… I said, ‘We need to fix the light bulbs.’ How you do anything is how you do everything.” “People now are starting to catch on: this is how we need to do this. We need to be better here. We need to support this more.” — Mississippi State Coach Jeff Lebby explains why the next step for a talented young quarterback is not always making more plays—it is learning which plays not to make: “I don’t necessarily put a ceiling on K1. The way he goes about his business on the day-to-day to prepare himself to have success between the white lines—it’s elite.” — Alabama Coach Kalen DeBoer explains why reputation, returning talent and last year’s progress mean nothing until the new team proves it again: “That’s okay, because we’ve got to go prove it. It doesn’t matter how many guys you return.” “Until we prove it, we understand there’s going to be doubt.” — Texas Coach Steve Sarkisian explains how Arch Manning handled being hyped by outsiders, blamed when their predictions failed, and refused to respond publicly: “Arch Manning wasn’t on social media or television saying, ‘I’m going to be the first pick of the draft.’ All he did was work really hard.” “Then those same people wanted to criticize and demean him almost for letting them down because he didn’t live up to what they thought he was going to be.” “What he got put through probably would have melted or destroyed 99% of people in his shoes.” “All he did was stay consistent and true to who he was. He didn’t go back on social media and say, ‘I told you so.’” “I think right now he’s a very dangerous player because he learned a lot from last season.”

I watched every SEC Football Media Day press conference so you don’t have to. Here’s the best answer from every head coach: -- LSU Coach Lane Kiffin on why personal growth often comes from subtracting, not constantly adding: “If you really want to keep growing, a lot of people add things as they go versus subtracting things that are issues.” “Once you remove something from your life, you start to realize how many other people are addicted to it or need it.” “To be free of that has been interesting because you don’t compare.” “Social media… makes you compare your job, the city you live in, your vacation, your kids, your clothes, your car, your significant other.” “When you don’t see that all day, you’re free of that comparison.” “It’s been a way of being more present.” — Georgia Coach Kirby Smart explains how leaders should operate when their industry is changing rapidly: “What wins football games has not changed. Each coach has to decide within their own program what they want to major in.” You’ve got to be able to wear multiple hats. But you’ve got to choose which hats you want to wear the best.” “I’m not afraid to change what we need to change to be successful. I don’t have an ego that says you have to do it my way. I want to hear how you want to do it, and let’s find the best way.” — Oklahoma Coach Brent Venables on the player who asked for more money before he had earned a role, and how he responded: “Why don’t you worry about playing first before we worry about incentives?” — Kentucky Coach Will Stein on why he believes Kentucky can overcome its history and win at a championship level: “I think because of me, to be honest.” “I know what it takes. I’ve seen it at the highest levels. You’ve just got to believe. You’ve just got to put the ball down and play.” “The best determination of whether what you’re doing is working is putting the ball down and playing football.” “There are going to be bumps in the road. I’m prepared for tough moments and tough times. I already do self-talk with myself: ‘How can I stay neutral when stuff’s bad?’” “You’ve got to go attack. You can’t sit back and wait.That’s one thing I refuse to do at Kentucky—wait.” — Missouri Coach Eli Drinkwitz explains what Ahmad Hardy’s recovery taught him about the real purpose of coaching: “There was that moment where he realized he was mortal. I’ve been very proud of the way he’s approached his recovery and his rehab. His number one responsibility is to be a father, and then after that, to continue to be a great teammate.” “That’s exactly what coaching is all about. It’s about taking young men on a journey from 18 to maturity—and it’s a lifelong process.” “Regardless of how much the business changes or is disrupted, it’s still about helping players achieve their dreams.” “When Ahmad scores his first touchdown this year, I’ll be thinking about that journey from hospital bed to end zone.” — South Carolina Coach Shane Beamer takes complete ownership of South Carolina’s disappointing season and explains how adversity revealed the strength of the program’s culture: “There was no ceiling on the football program at South Carolina, and nothing has changed. We fell woefully short, and that’s on me. We don’t seek comfort from how close we were.” — Vanderbilt Coach Clark Lea on Vanderbilt’s disastrous 2023 season and explains how it became the turning point that eventually led to a 10-win season: “That’s called getting your ass kicked.” “It may have been the most important thing that’s ever happened to me as a head coach and to the program.” “The vision never left us.” “In 15 years, when I look back on this moment, what am I learning right now—not what am I feeling right now?” — Tennessee Coach Josh Heupel explains how to develop an inexperienced quarterback without coaching away what makes him special: “The players have to go learn it, earn it, and compete for it every single day.” “Each one of them is a little bit different. They’re the artist. You’ve got to hand them the paintbrush and let them go paint it.” — Florida Coach John Sumrall explains the attitude he wants to establish at Florida: “I may have some bad moments. I don’t have bad days.” “Attitude is demeanor, drive and desire. Demeanor is your body language. Your drive and desire is the mindset that you’ve never arrived, you can always get better.” — Texas A&M Coach Mike Elko on how he prevents complacency after a playoff appearance: “I show them our trophy case, and it’s empty.” — Ole Miss Coach Pete Golding explains how he defines an elite program beyond wins and football performance: “Elite programs aren’t designed for when they’ve got cleats on. Elite programs are designed for when they take them cleats off.” “Are they a better dude? Are they a better husband? Are they a better father?” — Auburn Coach Alex Golesh explains where real confidence comes from: “Real confidence, not fake confidence, but real, authentic, genuine confidence, comes from elite-level process day in and day out.” — Arkansas Coach Ryan Silverfield explains why rebuilding Arkansas required examining every detail: “The night I got there… I said, ‘We need to fix the light bulbs.’ How you do anything is how you do everything.” “People now are starting to catch on: this is how we need to do this. We need to be better here. We need to support this more.” — Mississippi State Coach Jeff Lebby explains why the next step for a talented young quarterback is not always making more plays—it is learning which plays not to make: “I don’t necessarily put a ceiling on K1. The way he goes about his business on the day-to-day to prepare himself to have success between the white lines—it’s elite.” — Alabama Coach Kalen DeBoer explains why reputation, returning talent and last year’s progress mean nothing until the new team proves it again: “That’s okay, because we’ve got to go prove it. It doesn’t matter how many guys you return.” “Until we prove it, we understand there’s going to be doubt.” — Texas Coach Steve Sarkisian explains how Arch Manning handled being hyped by outsiders, blamed when their predictions failed, and refused to respond publicly: “Arch Manning wasn’t on social media or television saying, ‘I’m going to be the first pick of the draft.’ All he did was work really hard.” “Then those same people wanted to criticize and demean him almost for letting them down because he didn’t live up to what they thought he was going to be.” “What he got put through probably would have melted or destroyed 99% of people in his shoes.” “All he did was stay consistent and true to who he was. He didn’t go back on social media and say, ‘I told you so.’” “I think right now he’s a very dangerous player because he learned a lot from last season.”

Josh Chambers

63,845 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨NEW: Analysis of Candace Owens’ rooftop footage appears to show Tyler Robinson’s rifle recoil at the exact moment Charlie Kirk is shot. The footage was zoomed, sharpened, and contrast-enhanced. Despite the low resolution from recording a screen showing a distant man, you can clearly see where Robinson’s head and upper body appear to recoil backward in a frame that syncs with the gunshot. Robinson then flees the roof carrying what appears to be the rifle wrapped in a towel before stashing it in nearby bushes, consistent with what he described himself in text confessions to his boyfriend. TriggerSmart also breaks down the flashes Candace suggested could be military signals, showing they appear to be reflections from cars passing in the background. He notes Robinson had already been on the roof for roughly seven minutes before this clip begins, giving him ample time to assemble the rifle. Prosecutors allege Robinson carried the rifle disassembled under his clothing, causing the limp visible in surveillance footage as he approached the roof through the tunnel and stairs. To the skeptics: What exactly would you expect recoil to look like in footage captured by a camera recording a screen showing a distant man firing a .30-06 from the prone position? Since prone helps control recoil, how much movement would realistically be visible, and which parts of his body would move? And why does the visible recoil line up exactly with the gunshot? Full 1.5 hour stream:

🚨NEW: Analysis of Candace Owens’ rooftop footage appears to show Tyler Robinson’s rifle recoil at the exact moment Charlie Kirk is shot. The footage was zoomed, sharpened, and contrast-enhanced. Despite the low resolution from recording a screen showing a distant man, you can clearly see where Robinson’s head and upper body appear to recoil backward in a frame that syncs with the gunshot. Robinson then flees the roof carrying what appears to be the rifle wrapped in a towel before stashing it in nearby bushes, consistent with what he described himself in text confessions to his boyfriend. TriggerSmart also breaks down the flashes Candace suggested could be military signals, showing they appear to be reflections from cars passing in the background. He notes Robinson had already been on the roof for roughly seven minutes before this clip begins, giving him ample time to assemble the rifle. Prosecutors allege Robinson carried the rifle disassembled under his clothing, causing the limp visible in surveillance footage as he approached the roof through the tunnel and stairs. To the skeptics: What exactly would you expect recoil to look like in footage captured by a camera recording a screen showing a distant man firing a .30-06 from the prone position? Since prone helps control recoil, how much movement would realistically be visible, and which parts of his body would move? And why does the visible recoil line up exactly with the gunshot? Full 1.5 hour stream:

KanekoaTheGreat

83,601 次观看 • 24 天前

Heaven Birthday, O.A. "Bum" Phillips Born 102 Years Ago Today🤠🩵🕯️ A Tribute to the 'Patron Saint' of the #Oilers' "Luv Ya Blue" Phenomenon of the 1970s Head Coach and Leader of the Houston Oilers and New Orleans #Saints A "country gentleman" who completely rejuvenated a hapless franchise, restoring it to football prominence, while invigorating a city and fanbase in the process. Bum was one of #NFL history's most colorful characters, always good for an unforgettable country idiom. Unmistakably recognizable in his cowboy boots and Stetson hat, he instilled togetherness and indoctrinated team unity (both on and off the field) with the players on his Oilers and Saints teams of the 1970s and '80s — often allowing "family days" for his players at Saturday practice sessions and holding team pizza and beer nights during the season. Bum was an ingenious coach — a true innovative defensive mind, one who never seems to get his just due in that regard. Widely acknowledged as one of the inventors of the defensive numbering system that is currently used in the sport today, he — along with Chuck Fairbanks — took the basic, elementary principles of the college 3-4 defensive scheme and modernized it in earnest into a full-fledged pro base defensive alignment. Prior to this, elements of the pro 3-4 had only been seen in various substitution packages, most notably Bill Arnsparger's "53" defense for the Dolphins' Super Bowl teams. The linchpin of the alignment was future Hall of Famer Curley Culp, who Bum deployed as the proverbial "eye of the hurricane" at the newly-revolutionized nose tackle position. His play in 1975 would garner him NFL Defensive Player of the Year honors by the NEA. In 1975 — his first season as head coach of the Oilers — Phillips led #Houston to its first winning season in eight years and its first 10-win season since 1962. In 1978, Bum navigated the Oilers to their first postseason appearance in nine years, and from 1978 through 1980, led Houston to three consecutive postseason appearances — something that had not occurred since the first three seasons of the franchise's existence, 1960 through 1962. During his six seasons as head coach of the Oilers, Bum recorded five winning campaigns and four seasons with 10-or-more victories. In 1978 and again in '79, his teams would succumb to their fierce AFC Central rival — the eventual back-to-back Super Bowl champion Steelers — in the AFC Championship. After his time in Houston, Phillips moved on to coach the Saints from 1981 to 1985, leading the franchise to then only its second non-losing season ever in 1983. Heaven Birthday to a true original in every sense of the word🤠

Heaven Birthday, O.A. "Bum" Phillips Born 102 Years Ago Today🤠🩵🕯️ A Tribute to the 'Patron Saint' of the #Oilers' "Luv Ya Blue" Phenomenon of the 1970s Head Coach and Leader of the Houston Oilers and New Orleans #Saints A "country gentleman" who completely rejuvenated a hapless franchise, restoring it to football prominence, while invigorating a city and fanbase in the process. Bum was one of #NFL history's most colorful characters, always good for an unforgettable country idiom. Unmistakably recognizable in his cowboy boots and Stetson hat, he instilled togetherness and indoctrinated team unity (both on and off the field) with the players on his Oilers and Saints teams of the 1970s and '80s — often allowing "family days" for his players at Saturday practice sessions and holding team pizza and beer nights during the season. Bum was an ingenious coach — a true innovative defensive mind, one who never seems to get his just due in that regard. Widely acknowledged as one of the inventors of the defensive numbering system that is currently used in the sport today, he — along with Chuck Fairbanks — took the basic, elementary principles of the college 3-4 defensive scheme and modernized it in earnest into a full-fledged pro base defensive alignment. Prior to this, elements of the pro 3-4 had only been seen in various substitution packages, most notably Bill Arnsparger's "53" defense for the Dolphins' Super Bowl teams. The linchpin of the alignment was future Hall of Famer Curley Culp, who Bum deployed as the proverbial "eye of the hurricane" at the newly-revolutionized nose tackle position. His play in 1975 would garner him NFL Defensive Player of the Year honors by the NEA. In 1975 — his first season as head coach of the Oilers — Phillips led #Houston to its first winning season in eight years and its first 10-win season since 1962. In 1978, Bum navigated the Oilers to their first postseason appearance in nine years, and from 1978 through 1980, led Houston to three consecutive postseason appearances — something that had not occurred since the first three seasons of the franchise's existence, 1960 through 1962. During his six seasons as head coach of the Oilers, Bum recorded five winning campaigns and four seasons with 10-or-more victories. In 1978 and again in '79, his teams would succumb to their fierce AFC Central rival — the eventual back-to-back Super Bowl champion Steelers — in the AFC Championship. After his time in Houston, Phillips moved on to coach the Saints from 1981 to 1985, leading the franchise to then only its second non-losing season ever in 1983. Heaven Birthday to a true original in every sense of the word🤠

Kevin Gallagher

13,047 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨BOMBSHELL: Satellite Data CONFIRMS Date Of FBI's Starwell Photo Of Alleged SUSPECT In The Charlie Kirk Assassination—Baron Coleman Just Broke It All Down LIVE🕵️‍♂️🔍 If you caught my last post, you know the internet has been on fire questioning if the FBI’s "stairwell suspect" photo was even taken on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Many suspected a total fabrication—a staged photo from another date. Baron Coleman just officially ended that debate when he broke down live on his podcast exactly how he was able to prove the origin of the starwell photo by using high-res satellite imagery from September 10th, 2025. Baron was able to pinpoint the exact day of the UVU event from space. And what he found is the ultimate "fingerprint" of the timeline: The Vehicles: Look at the parking lot directly in the line of sight of the tunnel camera. There is a very specific setup: a pickup truck with oversized tires backed in at an angle, and a silver hatchback pulled in deep. The Match: Those exact two vehicles—in those exact positions—are visible in the background of the FBI's stairwell photo. The Verdict: The satellite data is dated September 10th. The cars match. That photo was taken on the day of the "Big Bang." "That definitively ends the discussion... that satellite image I just showed you was from September 10th." — Baron Coleman ⚠️ THE NEW MYSTERY But here is where the "official narrative" starts to rot. Now that we know for a fact the photo is from the day of the assassination, we have to look at the individual in the frame. If the photo is authentic, then the FBI has zero excuses left for why the person in that tunnel looks nothing like Tyler Robinson. * Genetic Impossibilities: We’ve already seen the earlobe discrepancies. Body Type Shift: We’ve seen the "linebacker" vs. "waif" frame differences. The "Enhanced" Trap: As Kash Patel let slip, these photos were "enhanced" (doctored). 👁️ THE REAL TAKEAWAY The FBI didn't fake the date of the photo—they likely used a real image of the real operative and then tried to "enhance" it to look more like their chosen patsy, Tyler Robinson. They took a real moment from a real conspiracy and tried to paint a fake face over it. The satellite proves the photo is real. The biology proves the suspect is a lie. Who was really walking through that tunnel while the "neck" was moving the "head"? We have the date. Now we need the real name. 👇 FOLLOW Baron Coleman and watch the FULL episode linked down below. 👇

🚨BOMBSHELL: Satellite Data CONFIRMS Date Of FBI's Starwell Photo Of Alleged SUSPECT In The Charlie Kirk Assassination—Baron Coleman Just Broke It All Down LIVE🕵️‍♂️🔍 If you caught my last post, you know the internet has been on fire questioning if the FBI’s "stairwell suspect" photo was even taken on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Many suspected a total fabrication—a staged photo from another date. Baron Coleman just officially ended that debate when he broke down live on his podcast exactly how he was able to prove the origin of the starwell photo by using high-res satellite imagery from September 10th, 2025. Baron was able to pinpoint the exact day of the UVU event from space. And what he found is the ultimate "fingerprint" of the timeline: The Vehicles: Look at the parking lot directly in the line of sight of the tunnel camera. There is a very specific setup: a pickup truck with oversized tires backed in at an angle, and a silver hatchback pulled in deep. The Match: Those exact two vehicles—in those exact positions—are visible in the background of the FBI's stairwell photo. The Verdict: The satellite data is dated September 10th. The cars match. That photo was taken on the day of the "Big Bang." "That definitively ends the discussion... that satellite image I just showed you was from September 10th." — Baron Coleman ⚠️ THE NEW MYSTERY But here is where the "official narrative" starts to rot. Now that we know for a fact the photo is from the day of the assassination, we have to look at the individual in the frame. If the photo is authentic, then the FBI has zero excuses left for why the person in that tunnel looks nothing like Tyler Robinson. * Genetic Impossibilities: We’ve already seen the earlobe discrepancies. Body Type Shift: We’ve seen the "linebacker" vs. "waif" frame differences. The "Enhanced" Trap: As Kash Patel let slip, these photos were "enhanced" (doctored). 👁️ THE REAL TAKEAWAY The FBI didn't fake the date of the photo—they likely used a real image of the real operative and then tried to "enhance" it to look more like their chosen patsy, Tyler Robinson. They took a real moment from a real conspiracy and tried to paint a fake face over it. The satellite proves the photo is real. The biology proves the suspect is a lie. Who was really walking through that tunnel while the "neck" was moving the "head"? We have the date. Now we need the real name. 👇 FOLLOW Baron Coleman and watch the FULL episode linked down below. 👇

Project Constitution

76,014 次观看 • 4 个月前

I want Knicks fans to watch the Sam Presti clip about Mark Daigneault before reacting to this Mike Brown/Leon Rose rotation-sheet story. Mark Daigneault was a g league coach before becoming an NBA coach. As a G League coach, Mark was given development priorities, lineup goals, and organizational objectives. The job isn’t “win tonight at all costs.” It’s to understand the roster, build chemistry, and develop players the organization needs to evaluate. Presti praises Daigneault specifically for being willing to try different rotations so everyplayer is prepared and there’s no drop-off when injuries hit. That’s the model. This matters because Knicks fans have been conditioned by the Thibodeau era, an era where the coach functionally operated with autonomy even without a front office title. The first moves of the Thibs/Rose tenure were Derrick Rose and Taj Gibson. Veterans who knew his system were prioritized over developing Quickley, Grimes, Obi, Sims and others, almost all of whom are still in the league and on second contracts, while the vets he leaned on are out of basketball. Even in losing seasons, he favored Kemba, Burks, Rose, Taj, and Fournier. That philosophy shaped real roster outcomes: running back the COVID team, signing more vets, skipping the lottery to preserve cap space for Brunson, and ultimately losing a 2023 2nd due to tampering. Those rookie-scale deals (Jalen Williams, Duren, Walsh types) matter under the new CBA. There were moments when the FO clearly pushed back: like the end-of-season shift from Taj to Sims, but for years the organization prioritized Thibs’ “win now” approach over long-term asset value. That’s why the Knicks entered the 2022 summer without a clean star-trade package, why they eventually traded Obi for two 2nds, why Grimes was included for Bojan, Quickley/RJ for OG, and why they ultimately emptied the war chest for Bridges. They built a win-now roster tailored for Thibs. But the playoffs exposed the limits: slow pace, tight rotations, heavy workloads, and no experimentation. Even players, including Bridges, complained about minutes and the lack of trust in the bench. The team needed spacing adjustments; Thibs resisted. When Brunson got into foul trouble in Game 3, the bench saved the night, and suddenly the Knicks looked alive again. It forced the question: why weren’t these players used earlier? Exit interviews reportedly made it clear: players didn’t understand their roles. That’s why Thibs is gone. the Knicks explicitly sought a coach who fits the leaguewide direction: collaborative, experimental, rotation-flexible, and aligned with analytics and sports science. This is how OKC, Indy, Boston, and almost every modern org operates. George Karl said in 2015 that barely ten coaches had real roster power anymore. TEN years later, it’s even fewer. We’ve watched Malone, Jenkins, and Thibs lose jobs for resisting organizational alignment. So the idea that Mike Brown giving Leon Rose a rotation sheet is some shocking headline? It’s not. It’s standard. Not “front office interference.” Not “shadow coaching.” It’s communication: the same communication that players have already praised in the early Mike Brown era. The Knicks aren’t doing anything unique here; they’re finally doing what elite franchises already do. As someone who has coached: collaboration is normal even at the high school level. No head coach just sits on a throne dictating everything. Multiply that by a multi-billion-dollar NBA organization under the new CBA, and of course coaches and front offices are in constant dialogue. If anything, this report shows the Knicks are moving toward the modern model. Not away from it.

I want Knicks fans to watch the Sam Presti clip about Mark Daigneault before reacting to this Mike Brown/Leon Rose rotation-sheet story. Mark Daigneault was a g league coach before becoming an NBA coach. As a G League coach, Mark was given development priorities, lineup goals, and organizational objectives. The job isn’t “win tonight at all costs.” It’s to understand the roster, build chemistry, and develop players the organization needs to evaluate. Presti praises Daigneault specifically for being willing to try different rotations so everyplayer is prepared and there’s no drop-off when injuries hit. That’s the model. This matters because Knicks fans have been conditioned by the Thibodeau era, an era where the coach functionally operated with autonomy even without a front office title. The first moves of the Thibs/Rose tenure were Derrick Rose and Taj Gibson. Veterans who knew his system were prioritized over developing Quickley, Grimes, Obi, Sims and others, almost all of whom are still in the league and on second contracts, while the vets he leaned on are out of basketball. Even in losing seasons, he favored Kemba, Burks, Rose, Taj, and Fournier. That philosophy shaped real roster outcomes: running back the COVID team, signing more vets, skipping the lottery to preserve cap space for Brunson, and ultimately losing a 2023 2nd due to tampering. Those rookie-scale deals (Jalen Williams, Duren, Walsh types) matter under the new CBA. There were moments when the FO clearly pushed back: like the end-of-season shift from Taj to Sims, but for years the organization prioritized Thibs’ “win now” approach over long-term asset value. That’s why the Knicks entered the 2022 summer without a clean star-trade package, why they eventually traded Obi for two 2nds, why Grimes was included for Bojan, Quickley/RJ for OG, and why they ultimately emptied the war chest for Bridges. They built a win-now roster tailored for Thibs. But the playoffs exposed the limits: slow pace, tight rotations, heavy workloads, and no experimentation. Even players, including Bridges, complained about minutes and the lack of trust in the bench. The team needed spacing adjustments; Thibs resisted. When Brunson got into foul trouble in Game 3, the bench saved the night, and suddenly the Knicks looked alive again. It forced the question: why weren’t these players used earlier? Exit interviews reportedly made it clear: players didn’t understand their roles. That’s why Thibs is gone. the Knicks explicitly sought a coach who fits the leaguewide direction: collaborative, experimental, rotation-flexible, and aligned with analytics and sports science. This is how OKC, Indy, Boston, and almost every modern org operates. George Karl said in 2015 that barely ten coaches had real roster power anymore. TEN years later, it’s even fewer. We’ve watched Malone, Jenkins, and Thibs lose jobs for resisting organizational alignment. So the idea that Mike Brown giving Leon Rose a rotation sheet is some shocking headline? It’s not. It’s standard. Not “front office interference.” Not “shadow coaching.” It’s communication: the same communication that players have already praised in the early Mike Brown era. The Knicks aren’t doing anything unique here; they’re finally doing what elite franchises already do. As someone who has coached: collaboration is normal even at the high school level. No head coach just sits on a throne dictating everything. Multiply that by a multi-billion-dollar NBA organization under the new CBA, and of course coaches and front offices are in constant dialogue. If anything, this report shows the Knicks are moving toward the modern model. Not away from it.

Poppa Left

120,380 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jim Jordan, Silence, and the Ritual of Control Wrestling rooms. Masonic slips. AIPAC strings. Jim Jordan wasn’t chosen to fight the system. He was processed to protect it. They paint him as a warrior. A patriot. A populist pit bull. But behind the rolled-up sleeves and scripted outrage is a man who passed his test the way all useful actors do: With silence. Because in the Beast System, the path to power always begins with ritual. And Jim Jordan passed his. The Abuse He Watched From 1987 to 1995, Jim Jordan served as assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University. During that time, Dr. Richard Strauss sexually abused at least 177 young men—most while Jordan was on staff. And everyone knew. “It was common knowledge,” former wrestlers told NBC. “Strauss showered with us. He groped us during exams. Everyone knew—including Jordan.” One athlete described: “I had a thumb injury… went into Strauss’ office… and he started pulling down my wrestling shorts.” Jordan didn’t speak up. He didn’t intervene. He didn’t protect them. What he did do, years later, was call one of the whistleblowers—crying, groveling, and begging him to lie: “He’s throwing us all under the bus. He’s a coward.” —Adam DiSabato, public testimony But cowardice isn’t the right word. Obedience is. In every ritualized power structure—Freemasonry, cartels, Hollywood, politics—the initiation is the same: Will you stay silent while innocence is destroyed in front of you? Silence isn’t a failure—it’s a future. It proves loyalty. It makes you useful. And once proven, the doors open. [I recommend reading article on my Substack for full experience, link below] The Masonic Nod In 2013, Jordan stood before Congress to honor the late Judge John F. Kuffner. After listing his military service, Jordan dropped this: “He received Mason of the Year honors in 2008 and was a 50-year member of Mercer Lodge No. 121…” —Congressional Record, Vol. 159, Pt. 11, p. 16554 Pause. Why would a Congressman spotlight Masonic credentials in a federal tribute? Why cite the exact lodge? Why honor a “Mason of the Year” award like it’s a military medal? Because it’s a tribute to those who understand the hierarchy. Masonic honors aren’t filler—but milestones. And they’re recognized by those who value the chain of oaths behind them. Jordan didn’t mention that by accident. He mentioned it because he’s one of them. Zion Before Nation Now look at his donors: • AIPAC • Koch Industries • The NRA Jordan is not grassroots. He’s network-approved. He’s never criticized: • Israeli spyware exports • Gov ties to Epstein’s network • Thiel’s Palantir role in predictive policing • Biometric surveillance Because he can’t. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you, especially when it’s also the one watching. The Big Tech Deception Jordan has publicly positioned himself as a staunch opponent of Big Tech censorship, launching investigations and issuing subpoenas to major tech companies like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft, alleging collusion with the Biden administration to suppress conservatives. However, this public stance contrasts with his actions behind the scenes. Jordan has accepted campaign contributions from tech giants, including Google, and has opposed antitrust measures aimed at breaking up these companies. Supporting Big Tech monopoly while chanting freedom. Shit like this bothers me much more than liberal retardation—but that’s a story for another time. Moreover, his close relationship with Elon Musk, a major tech figure, raises questions about his true intentions. Jordan has praised Musk’s efforts to combat censorship and has collaborated with him on various initiatives, including legislative changes that could benefit Musk’s business interests and military contracts. This duality suggests that Jordan’s public crusade against Big Tech may serve as a smokescreen, shielding deeper alliances and agendas. More below 👇🏻

Jim Jordan, Silence, and the Ritual of Control Wrestling rooms. Masonic slips. AIPAC strings. Jim Jordan wasn’t chosen to fight the system. He was processed to protect it. They paint him as a warrior. A patriot. A populist pit bull. But behind the rolled-up sleeves and scripted outrage is a man who passed his test the way all useful actors do: With silence. Because in the Beast System, the path to power always begins with ritual. And Jim Jordan passed his. The Abuse He Watched From 1987 to 1995, Jim Jordan served as assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University. During that time, Dr. Richard Strauss sexually abused at least 177 young men—most while Jordan was on staff. And everyone knew. “It was common knowledge,” former wrestlers told NBC. “Strauss showered with us. He groped us during exams. Everyone knew—including Jordan.” One athlete described: “I had a thumb injury… went into Strauss’ office… and he started pulling down my wrestling shorts.” Jordan didn’t speak up. He didn’t intervene. He didn’t protect them. What he did do, years later, was call one of the whistleblowers—crying, groveling, and begging him to lie: “He’s throwing us all under the bus. He’s a coward.” —Adam DiSabato, public testimony But cowardice isn’t the right word. Obedience is. In every ritualized power structure—Freemasonry, cartels, Hollywood, politics—the initiation is the same: Will you stay silent while innocence is destroyed in front of you? Silence isn’t a failure—it’s a future. It proves loyalty. It makes you useful. And once proven, the doors open. [I recommend reading article on my Substack for full experience, link below] The Masonic Nod In 2013, Jordan stood before Congress to honor the late Judge John F. Kuffner. After listing his military service, Jordan dropped this: “He received Mason of the Year honors in 2008 and was a 50-year member of Mercer Lodge No. 121…” —Congressional Record, Vol. 159, Pt. 11, p. 16554 Pause. Why would a Congressman spotlight Masonic credentials in a federal tribute? Why cite the exact lodge? Why honor a “Mason of the Year” award like it’s a military medal? Because it’s a tribute to those who understand the hierarchy. Masonic honors aren’t filler—but milestones. And they’re recognized by those who value the chain of oaths behind them. Jordan didn’t mention that by accident. He mentioned it because he’s one of them. Zion Before Nation Now look at his donors: • AIPAC • Koch Industries • The NRA Jordan is not grassroots. He’s network-approved. He’s never criticized: • Israeli spyware exports • Gov ties to Epstein’s network • Thiel’s Palantir role in predictive policing • Biometric surveillance Because he can’t. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you, especially when it’s also the one watching. The Big Tech Deception Jordan has publicly positioned himself as a staunch opponent of Big Tech censorship, launching investigations and issuing subpoenas to major tech companies like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft, alleging collusion with the Biden administration to suppress conservatives. However, this public stance contrasts with his actions behind the scenes. Jordan has accepted campaign contributions from tech giants, including Google, and has opposed antitrust measures aimed at breaking up these companies. Supporting Big Tech monopoly while chanting freedom. Shit like this bothers me much more than liberal retardation—but that’s a story for another time. Moreover, his close relationship with Elon Musk, a major tech figure, raises questions about his true intentions. Jordan has praised Musk’s efforts to combat censorship and has collaborated with him on various initiatives, including legislative changes that could benefit Musk’s business interests and military contracts. This duality suggests that Jordan’s public crusade against Big Tech may serve as a smokescreen, shielding deeper alliances and agendas. More below 👇🏻

🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

13,965 次观看 • 1 年前

$‼️Candace Owens Targets The BIZARRE Behavior Of Charlie Kirk's Inner Circle—Why Did NO ONE In Charlie Kirk’s Inner Circle CALL 911? Candace Owens demands answers. On her podcast, Candace Owens absolutely tore into the official story surrounding the Charlie Kirk case, pointing out massive, undeniable cracks in the timeline and calling out the deeply bizarre behavior of the Turning Point team. If you thought the narrative surrounding the suspect, Tyler Robinson, made perfect sense, you need to look at the details she just brought to light. Here are the 4 biggest bombshells from her breakdown: 1️⃣ Frank Turek’s Alibi Just Completely Cracked Frank Turek previously told Megyn Kelly that his phone was on a continuous, uninterrupted FaceTime call with his 35-year-old son from the exact moment of the event, all through the hospital transition, until he finally got back to his hotel. However, Pastor Jack Hibbs just accidentally blew that entire timeline wide open. In a recent sit-down recapping the event with Turek, Hibbs revealed that he received a phone call directly from Frank right after they arrived at the hospital emergency room. Turek visibly froze on camera as the contradiction landed. How do you make a separate call to Jack Hibbs if your phone was supposedly locked into a single, continuous family FaceTime call the entire time? 2️⃣ "Where is the Physical Evidence Against Tyler Robinson?" Candace highlighted that the state has virtually zero concrete physical evidence linking Tyler to the crime. While the public is constantly reminded that Robinson owned the gun, the state conveniently ignores that there are five other sets of prints on that weapon. Furthermore, the police failed to perform a basic Gunshot Residue (GSR) test to prove he even fired a weapon that day, bomb dogs completely failed to locate the gun in the field, and the crime scene was expeditiously paved over. She argues it is completely unconvincing that a "genius" student with a 4.0+ GPA would immediately write out a massive, detailed text and Discord confession narrative, only to leave a physical note hidden right under his keyboard. 3️⃣ Inexplicable Behavior from the Inner Circle When the incident occurred, not a single person in the inner circle called 911. Instead of building redundancy to reach emergency services, Mikey walked away and called his wife, while Blake Knaft called his mother. Meanwhile, Terrell was busy taking down cameras immediately after recording himself. Candace didn't hold back: "Why haven't you fired Terrell just for recording himself? ... You're fired for being a scumbag." She noted a unsettling shift in energy: At the initial memorial, the TPUSA team looked "healthy, renewed, and refreshed," even giggling during a night out at Charlie's favorite restaurant. But now that real questions are being asked, the visible stress, anger, and panic are taking over. 4️⃣ The Rigged Microphone Theory Outlining a deeply disruptive alternative theory, Candace questioned if Charlie Kirk's Rode microphone was actually a rigged device. The official story from TPUSA claimed they were running a brand-new live stream back to the office to cut clips expeditiously. However, Candace revealed that despite asking around, absolutely no one at the Turning Point USA office can actually confirm ever seeing or watching this supposed live stream. Where is the footage? "Objectively speaking, the actions of the Turning Point USA team look infinitely more suspicious to me than Tyler Robinson's." The corporate narrative is fracturing in real-time, and the demand for real transparency is reaching a boiling point. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story has never looked weaker. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:$

‼️Candace Owens Targets The BIZARRE Behavior Of Charlie Kirk's Inner Circle—Why Did NO ONE In Charlie Kirk’s Inner Circle CALL 911? Candace Owens demands answers. On her podcast, Candace Owens absolutely tore into the official story surrounding the Charlie Kirk case, pointing out massive, undeniable cracks in the timeline and calling out the deeply bizarre behavior of the Turning Point team. If you thought the narrative surrounding the suspect, Tyler Robinson, made perfect sense, you need to look at the details she just brought to light. Here are the 4 biggest bombshells from her breakdown: 1️⃣ Frank Turek’s Alibi Just Completely Cracked Frank Turek previously told Megyn Kelly that his phone was on a continuous, uninterrupted FaceTime call with his 35-year-old son from the exact moment of the event, all through the hospital transition, until he finally got back to his hotel. However, Pastor Jack Hibbs just accidentally blew that entire timeline wide open. In a recent sit-down recapping the event with Turek, Hibbs revealed that he received a phone call directly from Frank right after they arrived at the hospital emergency room. Turek visibly froze on camera as the contradiction landed. How do you make a separate call to Jack Hibbs if your phone was supposedly locked into a single, continuous family FaceTime call the entire time? 2️⃣ "Where is the Physical Evidence Against Tyler Robinson?" Candace highlighted that the state has virtually zero concrete physical evidence linking Tyler to the crime. While the public is constantly reminded that Robinson owned the gun, the state conveniently ignores that there are five other sets of prints on that weapon. Furthermore, the police failed to perform a basic Gunshot Residue (GSR) test to prove he even fired a weapon that day, bomb dogs completely failed to locate the gun in the field, and the crime scene was expeditiously paved over. She argues it is completely unconvincing that a "genius" student with a 4.0+ GPA would immediately write out a massive, detailed text and Discord confession narrative, only to leave a physical note hidden right under his keyboard. 3️⃣ Inexplicable Behavior from the Inner Circle When the incident occurred, not a single person in the inner circle called 911. Instead of building redundancy to reach emergency services, Mikey walked away and called his wife, while Blake Knaft called his mother. Meanwhile, Terrell was busy taking down cameras immediately after recording himself. Candace didn't hold back: "Why haven't you fired Terrell just for recording himself? ... You're fired for being a scumbag." She noted a unsettling shift in energy: At the initial memorial, the TPUSA team looked "healthy, renewed, and refreshed," even giggling during a night out at Charlie's favorite restaurant. But now that real questions are being asked, the visible stress, anger, and panic are taking over. 4️⃣ The Rigged Microphone Theory Outlining a deeply disruptive alternative theory, Candace questioned if Charlie Kirk's Rode microphone was actually a rigged device. The official story from TPUSA claimed they were running a brand-new live stream back to the office to cut clips expeditiously. However, Candace revealed that despite asking around, absolutely no one at the Turning Point USA office can actually confirm ever seeing or watching this supposed live stream. Where is the footage? "Objectively speaking, the actions of the Turning Point USA team look infinitely more suspicious to me than Tyler Robinson's." The corporate narrative is fracturing in real-time, and the demand for real transparency is reaching a boiling point. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story has never looked weaker. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

24,487 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨SHOCKING: New Suspect in Charlie Kirk Probe – Farnsworth Doppelganger Bombshell Ties to Fort Huachuca & MASSIVE Conflicts! In tonight's podast, Candace Owens dives DEEP into Fort Huachuca – Mitch Snow's sighting of a "congressman" (5'9", glasses, grayish-white hair) who he said looked very much like Rep. Mark Amodei. Mitch: "That face looks VERY familiar." But HOLD UP: Enter Eddie Farnsworth, Arizona State Rep & DEAD RINGER for Amodei – Doppelganger alert? Rep. Eddie Farnsworth is a lawmaker, charter-school owner and most importantly – he's Terrell Farnsworth's UNCLE (first cousin to Terrell's dad Duane). And Terrell? Candace's gut SCREAMS shady: Lied on thier phonecall about why he contaminsted the crimescene and tampered with evidence by moving snd standing on Charlie's char to remove the SD cards and take down the camera before the police arrived. Eddie blocked AZ child sex trafficking bill (despite nephew's rape conviction on a 13yo). Themes of child trafficking HAUNT this case – Fort Huachuca child porn ring scandals, AZ Mills hotspot nearby TPUSA HQ, even plane owners tied to anti-trafficking charities. Coincidence? Nah. VEven STRANGER, The Farnsworth clan seem to be popping up EVERYWHERE in this investigation: Terrell's father-in-law Tom Burt? Former EVP/COO of Duncan Aviation (retired 2019) – SAME place Egyptian planes were based & where rental cars for the foreign hit squad were grabbed. FBI connections? Sketchy AF! STUNNINGLY Terrell's COUSIN Michael Burt is also one of the LEAD DEFENSE ATTORNEY'S for Tyler Robinson (the alleged shooter)! HUGE conflict – why hasn't this been addressed?! And Tyler Bowyer? Thick as thieves with Terrell – high school buds, parents knew each other. Tyler's shady: Indicted, pardoned by Trump, debt-to-millionaire flip at TPUSA. He introduced Erica to politics, deep AZ ties to Farnsworths (Eddie & Sen. David Farnsworth sponsored bills with Erica's mom Lori Frensvie). AZ pols at Davis-Monthan Summit Sept 9th – 40min from Huachuca. Cover for a meetup? The Farnsworths also have DEEP military ties. Boyer-Farnsworth-Frantzve web since 2014 (or earlier). Candace: "Farnsworths popping up TOO MUCH. Terrell KNOWS more." This web SCREAMS cover-up! Feds, TPUSA – we're WATCHING. Be sure to FOLLOW Candace Owens and go watch her FULL explosive episode from tonight, I'll drop the link in the comments below. GET INVOLVED: Got tips? Reach out via DM or shoot me an email. Also Tag Candace Owens & RT to help us expose them all.

🚨SHOCKING: New Suspect in Charlie Kirk Probe – Farnsworth Doppelganger Bombshell Ties to Fort Huachuca & MASSIVE Conflicts! In tonight's podast, Candace Owens dives DEEP into Fort Huachuca – Mitch Snow's sighting of a "congressman" (5'9", glasses, grayish-white hair) who he said looked very much like Rep. Mark Amodei. Mitch: "That face looks VERY familiar." But HOLD UP: Enter Eddie Farnsworth, Arizona State Rep & DEAD RINGER for Amodei – Doppelganger alert? Rep. Eddie Farnsworth is a lawmaker, charter-school owner and most importantly – he's Terrell Farnsworth's UNCLE (first cousin to Terrell's dad Duane). And Terrell? Candace's gut SCREAMS shady: Lied on thier phonecall about why he contaminsted the crimescene and tampered with evidence by moving snd standing on Charlie's char to remove the SD cards and take down the camera before the police arrived. Eddie blocked AZ child sex trafficking bill (despite nephew's rape conviction on a 13yo). Themes of child trafficking HAUNT this case – Fort Huachuca child porn ring scandals, AZ Mills hotspot nearby TPUSA HQ, even plane owners tied to anti-trafficking charities. Coincidence? Nah. VEven STRANGER, The Farnsworth clan seem to be popping up EVERYWHERE in this investigation: Terrell's father-in-law Tom Burt? Former EVP/COO of Duncan Aviation (retired 2019) – SAME place Egyptian planes were based & where rental cars for the foreign hit squad were grabbed. FBI connections? Sketchy AF! STUNNINGLY Terrell's COUSIN Michael Burt is also one of the LEAD DEFENSE ATTORNEY'S for Tyler Robinson (the alleged shooter)! HUGE conflict – why hasn't this been addressed?! And Tyler Bowyer? Thick as thieves with Terrell – high school buds, parents knew each other. Tyler's shady: Indicted, pardoned by Trump, debt-to-millionaire flip at TPUSA. He introduced Erica to politics, deep AZ ties to Farnsworths (Eddie & Sen. David Farnsworth sponsored bills with Erica's mom Lori Frensvie). AZ pols at Davis-Monthan Summit Sept 9th – 40min from Huachuca. Cover for a meetup? The Farnsworths also have DEEP military ties. Boyer-Farnsworth-Frantzve web since 2014 (or earlier). Candace: "Farnsworths popping up TOO MUCH. Terrell KNOWS more." This web SCREAMS cover-up! Feds, TPUSA – we're WATCHING. Be sure to FOLLOW Candace Owens and go watch her FULL explosive episode from tonight, I'll drop the link in the comments below. GET INVOLVED: Got tips? Reach out via DM or shoot me an email. Also Tag Candace Owens & RT to help us expose them all.

Project Constitution

75,072 次观看 • 7 个月前

Ep. 10 Free The Money | As Cash Disappears: Why Monero Succeeds Where Bitcoin Fails In this episode I’m joined by Douglas Tuman, founder of MoneroTopia and host of Monero Talk Live, to explore why Monero is not only the ultimate privacy coin, but a foundational tool for freedom in the digital age. Doug explains how Monero was built to fix Bitcoin’s core flaws. Bitcoin’s public ledger allows for the tracking of transactions and balances, while Monero encrypts the sender, receiver, and amount by default. Monero’s privacy makes Monero fully fungible, meaning every coin is identical, untraceable, and cannot be tainted or blacklisted, something Bitcoin can never achieve. Doug breaks down why Monero is more decentralized at the mining level, using ASIC-resistant proof-of-work that allows everyday CPUs to secure the network, preventing control by large industrial mining operations and state pressure unlike Bitcoin. This makes Monero harder to censor and more resilient long-term. This episode tackles the controversial topic head-on: Monero’s use on dark markets. Rather than being a weakness, it’s evidence that Monero is the most private and effective digital cash available, just as cash and encryption have always been neutral tools used by both good and bad actors. At a deeper level, this conversation is about freedom. Cash is being eliminated. Privacy is necessary to prevent governments from wielding excessive power over individuals. Sign up for ITrustCapital with this link for $100 funding bonus. See why people are opening a tax-advantaged Crypto, Gold & Silver IRA for their future: 0:54 From Bitcoin Maxi to Monero Advocate: Doug’s personal journey into crypto (and the Dogecoin hack that changed everything) 8:18 Why Monero Is Truly Private: How Monero hides the sender, receiver, and amount by default 9:45 Beyond Privacy: Monero’s dynamic block size & why it actually scales on-chain (unlike Bitcoin) 13:30 Why Monero Is More Decentralized: ASIC-resistant mining, RandomX, and “one CPU, one vote” 17:30 Bitcoin’s Fatal Flaw: Why Bitcoin is no longer digital cash—or even digital gold 19:55 Why Privacy Coins Are Rising: Surveillance, debanking, and people waking up 24:05 How to Secure Your Crypto: Wallet safety, seed phrases, and avoiding catastrophic mistakes 28:00 MoneroTopia: Building real-world adoption and living on Monero 32:05 Running for Congress: Why Doug stepped into politics to defend Monero and financial privacy 38:00 The Realization: Why building a parallel crypto economy beats fighting the system from within 44:00 The Clarity Act & Aaron Day: How new legislation threatens self-custody—and who’s exposing it 45:55 Monero vs Zcash: The real differences in privacy, governance, and philosophy 51:40 The Next Monero Upgrade: Full-chain membership proofs explained 53:25 Private by Default = Fungible 59:05 Dark Markets & the Truth About Privacy: Why Monero’s use proves it’s the best digital cash 1:03:10 XMR Bazaar: Peer-to-peer markets, no middlemen, and a parallel economy built on Monero

Ep. 10 Free The Money | As Cash Disappears: Why Monero Succeeds Where Bitcoin Fails In this episode I’m joined by Douglas Tuman, founder of MoneroTopia and host of Monero Talk Live, to explore why Monero is not only the ultimate privacy coin, but a foundational tool for freedom in the digital age. Doug explains how Monero was built to fix Bitcoin’s core flaws. Bitcoin’s public ledger allows for the tracking of transactions and balances, while Monero encrypts the sender, receiver, and amount by default. Monero’s privacy makes Monero fully fungible, meaning every coin is identical, untraceable, and cannot be tainted or blacklisted, something Bitcoin can never achieve. Doug breaks down why Monero is more decentralized at the mining level, using ASIC-resistant proof-of-work that allows everyday CPUs to secure the network, preventing control by large industrial mining operations and state pressure unlike Bitcoin. This makes Monero harder to censor and more resilient long-term. This episode tackles the controversial topic head-on: Monero’s use on dark markets. Rather than being a weakness, it’s evidence that Monero is the most private and effective digital cash available, just as cash and encryption have always been neutral tools used by both good and bad actors. At a deeper level, this conversation is about freedom. Cash is being eliminated. Privacy is necessary to prevent governments from wielding excessive power over individuals. Sign up for ITrustCapital with this link for $100 funding bonus. See why people are opening a tax-advantaged Crypto, Gold & Silver IRA for their future: 0:54 From Bitcoin Maxi to Monero Advocate: Doug’s personal journey into crypto (and the Dogecoin hack that changed everything) 8:18 Why Monero Is Truly Private: How Monero hides the sender, receiver, and amount by default 9:45 Beyond Privacy: Monero’s dynamic block size & why it actually scales on-chain (unlike Bitcoin) 13:30 Why Monero Is More Decentralized: ASIC-resistant mining, RandomX, and “one CPU, one vote” 17:30 Bitcoin’s Fatal Flaw: Why Bitcoin is no longer digital cash—or even digital gold 19:55 Why Privacy Coins Are Rising: Surveillance, debanking, and people waking up 24:05 How to Secure Your Crypto: Wallet safety, seed phrases, and avoiding catastrophic mistakes 28:00 MoneroTopia: Building real-world adoption and living on Monero 32:05 Running for Congress: Why Doug stepped into politics to defend Monero and financial privacy 38:00 The Realization: Why building a parallel crypto economy beats fighting the system from within 44:00 The Clarity Act & Aaron Day: How new legislation threatens self-custody—and who’s exposing it 45:55 Monero vs Zcash: The real differences in privacy, governance, and philosophy 51:40 The Next Monero Upgrade: Full-chain membership proofs explained 53:25 Private by Default = Fungible 59:05 Dark Markets & the Truth About Privacy: Why Monero’s use proves it’s the best digital cash 1:03:10 XMR Bazaar: Peer-to-peer markets, no middlemen, and a parallel economy built on Monero

Bri Teresi

37,288 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 MEET THE 'NEW GARY': TPUSA’s Latest Talking Head Just Accidentally Proved Candace Owens Right.😂🤯 You have to almost feel sorry for Turning Point USA at this point. After their previous disinformation minister, "Gary," humiliated himself so thoroughly on this platform that he had to be memory-holed, Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff dragged a "New Gary" onto The Charlie Kirk Show today to try and salvage their collapsing narrative. Their mission? To gaslight the American people into believing that the explosive Daily Mail report—which confirmed the bullet found in Charlie’s neck does NOT match the gun found at the scene—is just "misleading garbage." But "New Gary" (Justin Nazarov, CEO of Phoenix Ammunition, who they clearly brought on because he owns a gun company and has "takes") immediately fumbled the ball. In an unparalleled moment of accidental wit, he actually confirmed that Candace Owens was right weeks ago when she reported the bullet was fragmented. Thanks for the assist, Gary 2.0. It’s time to peel back the layers of this desperate, panicky gaslighting session and debunk their claims line-by-line using actual facts and the official court filing they are terrified you will read. THE BIG LIE: SPINNING THE BALLISTICS FAILURE: TPUSA’s entire segment was dedicated to attacking the Daily Mail headline: "Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk, did not MATCH rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims." Kolvet, Neff, and the New Gary tried to spin this as "completely and utterly misleading," arguing that the only reason it didn't "match" is because it was fragmented, making toolmark analysis "best guess pseudoscience." They are desperately trying to convince you that this is just a spin by the defense team. THE FACT-CHECK: They are lying to you to contaminate the jury pool. If you actually look at the official defense filing (attached below), it doesn't say "the defense claims there is no match." It explicitly states on Page 2, Paragraph 2: "...but his defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson." The ATF—the federal government's own ballistics experts—are the ones who cannot match that fragment to that gun. Period. The New Gary can talk about hollow points all he wants, but he cannot change the fact that the actual physical evidence does not connect the patsy to the alleged murder weapon. THE SECOND LIE: THE DNA EVIDENCE: During the segment, New Gary tried to argue that even without a bullet match, they will have other "conclusions" to present, hinting at DNA. THE FACT-CHECK: Again, read the filing (Page 3, Paragraph 1). The defense explicitly notes that the delay is needed because the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that "several different DNAs were found on some items of evidence." It is NOT just Tyler Robinson's DNA. This was a contaminated crime scene with at least five different persons' DNA profiles found on various items recovered. They are trying to pretend it’s a neat "lone gunman" scene when the physical evidence screams that this was a multi-person operation. THE THIRD LIE: THE FAMILY 'BETRAYAL' MYTH: The most disgusting part of the TPUSA segments is their relentless attempt to frame Tyler’s family. Andrew Kolvet smirked about how the prosecution plans to call Tyler’s parents and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, to testify. They use this fact to perpetuate the lie that the family suspects Tyler and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is classic gaslighting. Just because the state calls someone as a witness does not mean they are supporting the state’s narrative. Have these high-paid "political operatives" never heard of a hostile witness? They are trying to imply that the family’s presence in court proves Tyler's guilt, which is an absurd logical fallacy. Let's look at what the family actually says: Tyler Robinson’s grandmother has gone on record stating she does NOT believe Tyler shot Charlie Kirk. She further confirmed Tyler doesn't even own a rifle, is not a "gun guy," had no experience firing weapons, and actively disliked guns. Independent journalists Brandi and Billie from the Brandi & Billie Show on YouTube spoke directly to Tyler's family at a hearing. The family told them they don't think he could have done it and that only 2% of what the mainstream media has reported is actually true. THE REAL STORY: THE VOLUNTARY SURRENDER: Kolvet and Neff are again lying about how Tyler was apprehended, claiming endless documentation proves his parents recognized the gun on the news and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is another easily debunked lie that TPUSA hopes you won't check. Candace Owens has a source close to the Robinson family who explicitly confirms Tyler's parents did NOT recognize the gun from the news, nor did they turn him in because they suspected him. We know this is fact because the initial gun photo circulating during the manhunt was not even the actual gun found. It was stock footage of a different weapon, not the WWII-era Mauser rifle allegedly recovered. How could his dad have noticed a gun that was never shown? The real reason Tyler surrendered, per Candace’s source, is that he was terrified of armed thugs—aka the SWAT team—busting down his and his parents’ door, destroying their home, and potentially shooting them. He came in voluntarily to clear his name and protect his family. Furthermore, we now know that Tyler Robinson did NOT confess to anything and has officially plead NOT GUILTY! Most damning of all? ALL video footage allegedly showing Tyler Robinson and his parents entering the sheriff's station to turn himself in has mysteriously gone missing or was allegedly destroyed. Multiple news outlets have confirmed that their FOIA requests for this crucial video have been denied because the footage conveniently no longer exists. THE DAMNING ADMISSION: TPUSA’S FEAR The final piece of this storytelling narrative is the most telling. Ask yourself: Why are Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, and Jack Posobiec—who claim to have been Charlie's "friends"—actively against the defense’s motion to postpone the preliminary hearing? Why are they trying to rush this trial along and railroad this kid despite overwhelming evidence that he is a patsy? If they were real friends who actually wanted justice for Charlie Kirk, they would welcome more time for a thorough investigation to ensure the correct assassins faced justice. Instead, they are terrified of the six-month delay the defense is asking for to review the 20,000 files and 700 hours of video. This rush to judgment, this attempt to sweep everything under the rug, is in my journalistic opinion, an admission of guilt. They are freaking out because their entire fed-slop narrative is falling apart in real-time. They know that once Tyler Robinson is found not guilty, the spotlight will turn inward—toward the people closest to Charlie, the ones who had significant motive to see him dead. That is what they are truly terrified of.🇺🇸

🚨 MEET THE 'NEW GARY': TPUSA’s Latest Talking Head Just Accidentally Proved Candace Owens Right.😂🤯 You have to almost feel sorry for Turning Point USA at this point. After their previous disinformation minister, "Gary," humiliated himself so thoroughly on this platform that he had to be memory-holed, Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff dragged a "New Gary" onto The Charlie Kirk Show today to try and salvage their collapsing narrative. Their mission? To gaslight the American people into believing that the explosive Daily Mail report—which confirmed the bullet found in Charlie’s neck does NOT match the gun found at the scene—is just "misleading garbage." But "New Gary" (Justin Nazarov, CEO of Phoenix Ammunition, who they clearly brought on because he owns a gun company and has "takes") immediately fumbled the ball. In an unparalleled moment of accidental wit, he actually confirmed that Candace Owens was right weeks ago when she reported the bullet was fragmented. Thanks for the assist, Gary 2.0. It’s time to peel back the layers of this desperate, panicky gaslighting session and debunk their claims line-by-line using actual facts and the official court filing they are terrified you will read. THE BIG LIE: SPINNING THE BALLISTICS FAILURE: TPUSA’s entire segment was dedicated to attacking the Daily Mail headline: "Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk, did not MATCH rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims." Kolvet, Neff, and the New Gary tried to spin this as "completely and utterly misleading," arguing that the only reason it didn't "match" is because it was fragmented, making toolmark analysis "best guess pseudoscience." They are desperately trying to convince you that this is just a spin by the defense team. THE FACT-CHECK: They are lying to you to contaminate the jury pool. If you actually look at the official defense filing (attached below), it doesn't say "the defense claims there is no match." It explicitly states on Page 2, Paragraph 2: "...but his defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson." The ATF—the federal government's own ballistics experts—are the ones who cannot match that fragment to that gun. Period. The New Gary can talk about hollow points all he wants, but he cannot change the fact that the actual physical evidence does not connect the patsy to the alleged murder weapon. THE SECOND LIE: THE DNA EVIDENCE: During the segment, New Gary tried to argue that even without a bullet match, they will have other "conclusions" to present, hinting at DNA. THE FACT-CHECK: Again, read the filing (Page 3, Paragraph 1). The defense explicitly notes that the delay is needed because the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that "several different DNAs were found on some items of evidence." It is NOT just Tyler Robinson's DNA. This was a contaminated crime scene with at least five different persons' DNA profiles found on various items recovered. They are trying to pretend it’s a neat "lone gunman" scene when the physical evidence screams that this was a multi-person operation. THE THIRD LIE: THE FAMILY 'BETRAYAL' MYTH: The most disgusting part of the TPUSA segments is their relentless attempt to frame Tyler’s family. Andrew Kolvet smirked about how the prosecution plans to call Tyler’s parents and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, to testify. They use this fact to perpetuate the lie that the family suspects Tyler and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is classic gaslighting. Just because the state calls someone as a witness does not mean they are supporting the state’s narrative. Have these high-paid "political operatives" never heard of a hostile witness? They are trying to imply that the family’s presence in court proves Tyler's guilt, which is an absurd logical fallacy. Let's look at what the family actually says: Tyler Robinson’s grandmother has gone on record stating she does NOT believe Tyler shot Charlie Kirk. She further confirmed Tyler doesn't even own a rifle, is not a "gun guy," had no experience firing weapons, and actively disliked guns. Independent journalists Brandi and Billie from the Brandi & Billie Show on YouTube spoke directly to Tyler's family at a hearing. The family told them they don't think he could have done it and that only 2% of what the mainstream media has reported is actually true. THE REAL STORY: THE VOLUNTARY SURRENDER: Kolvet and Neff are again lying about how Tyler was apprehended, claiming endless documentation proves his parents recognized the gun on the news and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is another easily debunked lie that TPUSA hopes you won't check. Candace Owens has a source close to the Robinson family who explicitly confirms Tyler's parents did NOT recognize the gun from the news, nor did they turn him in because they suspected him. We know this is fact because the initial gun photo circulating during the manhunt was not even the actual gun found. It was stock footage of a different weapon, not the WWII-era Mauser rifle allegedly recovered. How could his dad have noticed a gun that was never shown? The real reason Tyler surrendered, per Candace’s source, is that he was terrified of armed thugs—aka the SWAT team—busting down his and his parents’ door, destroying their home, and potentially shooting them. He came in voluntarily to clear his name and protect his family. Furthermore, we now know that Tyler Robinson did NOT confess to anything and has officially plead NOT GUILTY! Most damning of all? ALL video footage allegedly showing Tyler Robinson and his parents entering the sheriff's station to turn himself in has mysteriously gone missing or was allegedly destroyed. Multiple news outlets have confirmed that their FOIA requests for this crucial video have been denied because the footage conveniently no longer exists. THE DAMNING ADMISSION: TPUSA’S FEAR The final piece of this storytelling narrative is the most telling. Ask yourself: Why are Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, and Jack Posobiec—who claim to have been Charlie's "friends"—actively against the defense’s motion to postpone the preliminary hearing? Why are they trying to rush this trial along and railroad this kid despite overwhelming evidence that he is a patsy? If they were real friends who actually wanted justice for Charlie Kirk, they would welcome more time for a thorough investigation to ensure the correct assassins faced justice. Instead, they are terrified of the six-month delay the defense is asking for to review the 20,000 files and 700 hours of video. This rush to judgment, this attempt to sweep everything under the rug, is in my journalistic opinion, an admission of guilt. They are freaking out because their entire fed-slop narrative is falling apart in real-time. They know that once Tyler Robinson is found not guilty, the spotlight will turn inward—toward the people closest to Charlie, the ones who had significant motive to see him dead. That is what they are truly terrified of.🇺🇸

Project Constitution

242,003 次观看 • 4 个月前

OpenAI and Palantir are so terrified of this guy, they're spending millions to destroy him. There's a Democrat running for Congress in New York's 12th District named Alex Bores. Never heard of him? Well that's the point. 3 year state assemblyman. 30 bills passed. Co-author of the RAISE Act, the first real AI safety law in any major state. Soft bill. Basic transparency. Safety plans. Incident reporting. And for that, the AI industry has declared WAR on him. A Super PAC called Leading the Future has already dumped $2.5 million into destroying his campaign. Funded by Joe Lonsdale (Palantir co-founder), Greg Brockman (OpenAI co-founder), and Andreessen Horowitz. They've said they may spend up to $10 million. For a single House seat. But the money isn't the crazy part... The crazy part is what they've said OUT LOUD about why: They're trying to make him SUFFER so publicly that every future politician who even THINKS about regulating AI runs the other way. Bores' exact words: "They want to beat up on me so bad that when the idea of regulating AI comes up in the future, politicians run the other way." This is literally political deterrence. Terrorize one guy so brutally that Congress learns the lesson: Touch AI, end your career. Now here's where it gets really insane: Their main attack line is that Bores worked at Palantir "building ICE tech." And who funds the attacks? Joe Lonsdale. Palantir co-founder. The man who profits from ICE contracts is spending millions to attack a candidate for… once working at Palantir. But Bores QUIT Palantir in 2019 because executives refused to put anti-deportation guardrails into their ICE contracts after Trump's first election. He pushed internally. They said no. He walked. So the billionaire who funds deportation tech is spending millions to smear a candidate for working on deportation tech that the candidate actually tried to stop. You cannot make this up. And the question everyone should ask is: Why THIS guy? Bores isn't a radical. He's not anti-AI. Not Bernie Sanders. He's a moderate Democrat with a CS degree who passed the softest possible AI bill. Which is EXACTLY why Palantir and OpenAI are terrified of him. Because he proved something dangerous: You can actually pass AI regulation. It's not impossible. You just need one competent legislator who understands the tech and refuses to back down. Multiply that by 50 states and AI companies lose control forever. So they're not just attacking Bores the candidate. They're attacking the PROOF that AI regulation is possible. And they're doing it while OpenAI quietly publishes policy documents that ADMIT most of Bores' proposed regulations are reasonable. Third-party audits? They agree. Red-teaming? They agree. Kid safety provisions? They agree. They don't disagree with the substance. They disagree with the TIMING. They want regulation to come AFTER they've bought enough political power to write it themselves. That's what $2.5 million to destroy one assemblyman actually buys. Not an election. But a warning to every politician watching: If a first-term legislator with a soft bill can get buried under $10 million of attack ads, imagine what we'll do to you if you try to pass a real one. This is how industries capture democracy. With FEAR. And it's working. Members of Congress are already telling Bores in private: "We're watching this race. We want to see if this is an issue you can win on, or if money just swamps everything." Which basically means: Tell us if we're allowed to legislate on this. The crypto industry ran this exact playbook in 2024 through Fairshake. Hundreds of millions spent. Anti-crypto candidates destroyed. Congress rewritten. Now AI is running it at 10x the scale. Leading the Future: $125M raised. AI companies: $300M+ committed to the 2026 midterms. More than crypto spent in the ENTIRE 2024 cycle. All on one principle: Don't debate your critics. Destroy them so publicly nobody else dares become one. Palantir isn't scared of losing a House seat. OpenAI isn't scared of one guy's bill. They're scared of PRECEDENT. Because if Bores wins, the lesson Congress learns is that you CAN take on AI and survive. And that's the one lesson the industry can never afford them to learn. What's your take on this?

OpenAI and Palantir are so terrified of this guy, they're spending millions to destroy him. There's a Democrat running for Congress in New York's 12th District named Alex Bores. Never heard of him? Well that's the point. 3 year state assemblyman. 30 bills passed. Co-author of the RAISE Act, the first real AI safety law in any major state. Soft bill. Basic transparency. Safety plans. Incident reporting. And for that, the AI industry has declared WAR on him. A Super PAC called Leading the Future has already dumped $2.5 million into destroying his campaign. Funded by Joe Lonsdale (Palantir co-founder), Greg Brockman (OpenAI co-founder), and Andreessen Horowitz. They've said they may spend up to $10 million. For a single House seat. But the money isn't the crazy part... The crazy part is what they've said OUT LOUD about why: They're trying to make him SUFFER so publicly that every future politician who even THINKS about regulating AI runs the other way. Bores' exact words: "They want to beat up on me so bad that when the idea of regulating AI comes up in the future, politicians run the other way." This is literally political deterrence. Terrorize one guy so brutally that Congress learns the lesson: Touch AI, end your career. Now here's where it gets really insane: Their main attack line is that Bores worked at Palantir "building ICE tech." And who funds the attacks? Joe Lonsdale. Palantir co-founder. The man who profits from ICE contracts is spending millions to attack a candidate for… once working at Palantir. But Bores QUIT Palantir in 2019 because executives refused to put anti-deportation guardrails into their ICE contracts after Trump's first election. He pushed internally. They said no. He walked. So the billionaire who funds deportation tech is spending millions to smear a candidate for working on deportation tech that the candidate actually tried to stop. You cannot make this up. And the question everyone should ask is: Why THIS guy? Bores isn't a radical. He's not anti-AI. Not Bernie Sanders. He's a moderate Democrat with a CS degree who passed the softest possible AI bill. Which is EXACTLY why Palantir and OpenAI are terrified of him. Because he proved something dangerous: You can actually pass AI regulation. It's not impossible. You just need one competent legislator who understands the tech and refuses to back down. Multiply that by 50 states and AI companies lose control forever. So they're not just attacking Bores the candidate. They're attacking the PROOF that AI regulation is possible. And they're doing it while OpenAI quietly publishes policy documents that ADMIT most of Bores' proposed regulations are reasonable. Third-party audits? They agree. Red-teaming? They agree. Kid safety provisions? They agree. They don't disagree with the substance. They disagree with the TIMING. They want regulation to come AFTER they've bought enough political power to write it themselves. That's what $2.5 million to destroy one assemblyman actually buys. Not an election. But a warning to every politician watching: If a first-term legislator with a soft bill can get buried under $10 million of attack ads, imagine what we'll do to you if you try to pass a real one. This is how industries capture democracy. With FEAR. And it's working. Members of Congress are already telling Bores in private: "We're watching this race. We want to see if this is an issue you can win on, or if money just swamps everything." Which basically means: Tell us if we're allowed to legislate on this. The crypto industry ran this exact playbook in 2024 through Fairshake. Hundreds of millions spent. Anti-crypto candidates destroyed. Congress rewritten. Now AI is running it at 10x the scale. Leading the Future: $125M raised. AI companies: $300M+ committed to the 2026 midterms. More than crypto spent in the ENTIRE 2024 cycle. All on one principle: Don't debate your critics. Destroy them so publicly nobody else dares become one. Palantir isn't scared of losing a House seat. OpenAI isn't scared of one guy's bill. They're scared of PRECEDENT. Because if Bores wins, the lesson Congress learns is that you CAN take on AI and survive. And that's the one lesson the industry can never afford them to learn. What's your take on this?

Ricardo

95,661 次观看 • 4 个月前

Catherine Austin Fitts on "breakthrough" tech funded by taxpayers' "missing money" "they've built an awful lot of infrastructure... ships in the sky... stuff going on underground... we can run cars from water... [and] if they can get the price of graphene down... what you can do with materials is unbelievable" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Versan Aljarrah (Versan | Black Swan Capitalist), the founder of Black Swan Capitalist, posted to YouTube on July 2, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've tried to trace where the money theoretically could go, sort of as a conceptual matter, but I think they've built an awful lot of infrastructure which is not something we don't see when we walk around— "So, much more impressive ships in the sky, much more stuff going on underground... And especially because we're, as a society, we're using 50- and 100- year-old legacy technology. "And we know, I mean, I just know I'm in the Netherlands because my partners here I first met in 2012 because they led the breakthrough energy conferences in, in, in the Netherlands and the US, as well as the secret space program. "Because a lot of the breakthrough energy is associated with the sort of the space programs. And if you just look at the technology we've had for over 100 years to dramatically reduce the price of energy, we know this technology works. We know we can run cars from water. "We know all of this stuff is feasible. And the question is, when is it going to be allowed and integrated into the regular economy? Your guess is as good as mine, but somebody's got it. "So when the head of Lockheed Skunk Works said in 1996, we now have the technology to take ET home— That tech, I, I'm taking him for his word, I think he was telling the truth, but I don't think we've— It was, I don't know if you saw this Lockheed CEO the other day sometime in the last year on a conference call with investors was talking about the incredible technology they, they've developed, they've just developed that he can't talk about.... "I think there's a lot of technology that's going to come out of the lab over the next 10 to 15 years. And, you know, so the other day they, they built literally a modular nuclear plant that they can put in an airplane and fly to a military base. Right? "You know, you have a lot of practical applications coming. If you just look in material science, if they can get the price of graphene down, I mean, what you can do with materials is just unbelievable. "So I think, when, when Trump or these guys talk about a golden age. I don't think they're being ridiculous. I think they understand the possibilities of this technology and they get all excited about it. "But the problem is there's no way to communicate it in a way that people can really understand because the guys who want to make money from it want to, you know, keep it to themselves. So you have a— there's, there are real conflict issues on, on how this technology comes out and who knows about it. But I think the potential for technology to dramatically improve productivity is enormous."

Catherine Austin Fitts on "breakthrough" tech funded by taxpayers' "missing money" "they've built an awful lot of infrastructure... ships in the sky... stuff going on underground... we can run cars from water... [and] if they can get the price of graphene down... what you can do with materials is unbelievable" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Versan Aljarrah (Versan | Black Swan Capitalist), the founder of Black Swan Capitalist, posted to YouTube on July 2, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've tried to trace where the money theoretically could go, sort of as a conceptual matter, but I think they've built an awful lot of infrastructure which is not something we don't see when we walk around— "So, much more impressive ships in the sky, much more stuff going on underground... And especially because we're, as a society, we're using 50- and 100- year-old legacy technology. "And we know, I mean, I just know I'm in the Netherlands because my partners here I first met in 2012 because they led the breakthrough energy conferences in, in, in the Netherlands and the US, as well as the secret space program. "Because a lot of the breakthrough energy is associated with the sort of the space programs. And if you just look at the technology we've had for over 100 years to dramatically reduce the price of energy, we know this technology works. We know we can run cars from water. "We know all of this stuff is feasible. And the question is, when is it going to be allowed and integrated into the regular economy? Your guess is as good as mine, but somebody's got it. "So when the head of Lockheed Skunk Works said in 1996, we now have the technology to take ET home— That tech, I, I'm taking him for his word, I think he was telling the truth, but I don't think we've— It was, I don't know if you saw this Lockheed CEO the other day sometime in the last year on a conference call with investors was talking about the incredible technology they, they've developed, they've just developed that he can't talk about.... "I think there's a lot of technology that's going to come out of the lab over the next 10 to 15 years. And, you know, so the other day they, they built literally a modular nuclear plant that they can put in an airplane and fly to a military base. Right? "You know, you have a lot of practical applications coming. If you just look in material science, if they can get the price of graphene down, I mean, what you can do with materials is just unbelievable. "So I think, when, when Trump or these guys talk about a golden age. I don't think they're being ridiculous. I think they understand the possibilities of this technology and they get all excited about it. "But the problem is there's no way to communicate it in a way that people can really understand because the guys who want to make money from it want to, you know, keep it to themselves. So you have a— there's, there are real conflict issues on, on how this technology comes out and who knows about it. But I think the potential for technology to dramatically improve productivity is enormous."

Sense Receptor

16,646 次观看 • 1 个月前

🔥 MUST-WATCH: Fox News host Aishah Hasnie breaks down the findings from our latest Fox News Digital investigation into the "Delaney Hall 100" network behind the anti-ICE protests in Newark, New Jersey. Inside the secret network fueling anti-ICE uprisings: Documenting the 'Delaney Hall 100' and their secret Signal chats After reading the investigation, Aisha said, "It was epic." This segment is one of the reasons I appreciate working at Fox News Digital. Aishah and her talented team distilled a week of reporting, document review, field reporting, financial analysis and coalition mapping into a powerful 6-minute, 33-second piece that brings the story to life in a way only TV can do. Thank you, Aishah! Since last Thursday, when word spread that activists were mobilizing around Delaney Hall, I've been investigating the organizations, funding networks, communications infrastructure and coalition structure behind the protests outside the detention facility on Doremus Avenue. Huge credit to my colleagues Michael Dorgan and Preston Mizell, who spent hours on the ground documenting agitators, photographing signs and organizational branding and capturing video that helped identify many of the groups involved. We gpt valuable assistance from hi-tech researchers DataRepublican (small r) bitchuneedsoap ASTRA RCE, whose work helped me connect important pieces of the puzzle. I call them America's Digital Avengers. This story was reported under unusual circumstances. Much of my work happened from my father's hospital room while he battled sepsis and pneumonia. I worked between doctors' rounds during the day and through the night so he wouldn't wake up alone and disoriented. The good news: he's improving, now in rehab and on the road to recovery. The article is now live. You can read it at this link: Be sure to read it, and then watch the segment in full. Pay close attention to the Signal messages shown on screen. Many of them appear mundane at first glance, but together they reveal how organizers coordinate transportation, logistics, communications, supplies and on-the-ground operations. The story also includes the full communications guide referenced in the segment. It's a document outlining anti-ICE messaging, terminology and content strategy. "We should be very concerned about the Delaney Hall 100," Chuck Flint, a nonprofit expert and former U.S. Senate chief of staff, told me. "Protests like the kind we're seeing outside Delaney Hall are not organic protests. These are manufactured strategic, calculated endeavors by an army of nonprofits meant to push subversive activity. These groups generate annual revenues greater than many of the cities in which they protest. They act like military battalions with the ability to overwhelm a city's public safety resources." "It's David vs. Goliath," said Flint, who is also a former state prosecutor. Watch the video. Read the article. This is my favorite type of reporting: breaking the fourth wall on protest theater!

🔥 MUST-WATCH: Fox News host Aishah Hasnie breaks down the findings from our latest Fox News Digital investigation into the "Delaney Hall 100" network behind the anti-ICE protests in Newark, New Jersey. Inside the secret network fueling anti-ICE uprisings: Documenting the 'Delaney Hall 100' and their secret Signal chats After reading the investigation, Aisha said, "It was epic." This segment is one of the reasons I appreciate working at Fox News Digital. Aishah and her talented team distilled a week of reporting, document review, field reporting, financial analysis and coalition mapping into a powerful 6-minute, 33-second piece that brings the story to life in a way only TV can do. Thank you, Aishah! Since last Thursday, when word spread that activists were mobilizing around Delaney Hall, I've been investigating the organizations, funding networks, communications infrastructure and coalition structure behind the protests outside the detention facility on Doremus Avenue. Huge credit to my colleagues Michael Dorgan and Preston Mizell, who spent hours on the ground documenting agitators, photographing signs and organizational branding and capturing video that helped identify many of the groups involved. We gpt valuable assistance from hi-tech researchers DataRepublican (small r) bitchuneedsoap ASTRA RCE, whose work helped me connect important pieces of the puzzle. I call them America's Digital Avengers. This story was reported under unusual circumstances. Much of my work happened from my father's hospital room while he battled sepsis and pneumonia. I worked between doctors' rounds during the day and through the night so he wouldn't wake up alone and disoriented. The good news: he's improving, now in rehab and on the road to recovery. The article is now live. You can read it at this link: Be sure to read it, and then watch the segment in full. Pay close attention to the Signal messages shown on screen. Many of them appear mundane at first glance, but together they reveal how organizers coordinate transportation, logistics, communications, supplies and on-the-ground operations. The story also includes the full communications guide referenced in the segment. It's a document outlining anti-ICE messaging, terminology and content strategy. "We should be very concerned about the Delaney Hall 100," Chuck Flint, a nonprofit expert and former U.S. Senate chief of staff, told me. "Protests like the kind we're seeing outside Delaney Hall are not organic protests. These are manufactured strategic, calculated endeavors by an army of nonprofits meant to push subversive activity. These groups generate annual revenues greater than many of the cities in which they protest. They act like military battalions with the ability to overwhelm a city's public safety resources." "It's David vs. Goliath," said Flint, who is also a former state prosecutor. Watch the video. Read the article. This is my favorite type of reporting: breaking the fourth wall on protest theater!

Asra Nomani

51,938 次观看 • 2 个月前

Tim Walz’s Hunting Gaffe Explained:🧵 I’ve done a lot of pheasant hunting. As a high schooler, I made extra $ assisting guides on pheasant hunts: getting the hunters in the field, flushing game for them to easily shoot, and making sure they are safe. And much more since those days. You learn to spot the guys who are a potential danger to themselves and others. Everything about them is new: the shotgun, the gear, the clothing. They look like they’ve just stepped out of an LL Bean catalog. This isn’t meant as a criticism. But if you’re leading the hunt it’s a visual clue that he’s probably new to this and, in his excitement, he went to his local hunting store bought all the gear in an effort to look like one of the guys. It tells you to keep an eye on him and to be ready to offer quiet instruction so as not to embarrass him. I don’t fault Walz for clearly being inexperienced with firearms and hunting. Anyone who is proficient in either had to learn sometime. For most of us, I think, the scorn heaped upon him is due to the fraudulent nature of it all. What VP candidate takes a day off to go hunting? Well, they don’t unless they see it as a photo op. Dems realize Americans think Walz is a beta male weirdo, so some campaign genius said, “I got it! He’ll go hunting! He’ll look manly!” With the exception of “The Natural,” I generally hate sports movies because the lead actor usually looks like he’s never played sports in his life. Watching Walz handle a shotgun is like watching Keanu Reeves throw a football in “The Replacements.” It’s painful. (Robert Redford was believable as an aging baseball player because he clearly played the game as a boy. Same with Kevin Costner in “For the Love of the Game.”) In this video, Walz appears to be having difficulty loading his shotgun while on a pheasant hunt. He tells the reporter, whose questioning tone suggests she’s not buying any of this, that it’s a Beretta A400. The A400 is a semi-auto shotgun. Many guides don’t allow semi-autos on a hunt because they can’t see at a distance that you’re “safe.” A break-action double-barrel is therefore preferred since they can tell when your gun cannot be fired (be it loaded or not). This is because the barrel is on a hinge that “breaks” open to permit manual loading. And this is very important for safety. I would wager that most accidental shotgun deaths involve semi-autos. This is all the more important in pheasant hunting. Unlike, say, deer hunting where you might sit in a tree all day long by yourself, pheasant hunting is typically done in large groups where the hunters are arranged in a crescent and marched through a field toward “blockers,” that is, hunters who stand still in a line. The idea is to drive the birds into the blockers and force them to flight. Hunting in such close proximity with other hunters can be dangerous for a variety of reasons: the birds fly parallel to the ground at head level, excitable hunters start blasting away at everything that moves or don’t wait for the birds to reach a safe height, accidental discharges, etc. A guide wants to see that your weapon is open and therefore inoperable in all but the hunt. The loading port on the A400 is beneath the weapon near the trigger guard. This type of loading is an acquired skill, and Walz doesn’t have it. (I’ll add that Walz says he bought it for trap shooting. In this he is correct. I wouldn’t want to use an A400 pheasant hunting. It’s not a field gun. It’s heavy. But it’s excellent for clays.) He fumbles around and, sensing he’s making a fool of himself, he appears to stop before he’s managed to get it loaded. As you can see, this carefully choreographed hunt wasn’t so carefully choreographed. It’s become Tim Walz’s Michael Dukakis-in-the-tank moment. It’s also noteworthy that in this gaffe Democrats, for all their faux rage about “toxic masculinity,” unwittingly pay homage to masculinity and its appeal. They do know what it is. They just don’t know how to practice it.

Tim Walz’s Hunting Gaffe Explained:🧵 I’ve done a lot of pheasant hunting. As a high schooler, I made extra $ assisting guides on pheasant hunts: getting the hunters in the field, flushing game for them to easily shoot, and making sure they are safe. And much more since those days. You learn to spot the guys who are a potential danger to themselves and others. Everything about them is new: the shotgun, the gear, the clothing. They look like they’ve just stepped out of an LL Bean catalog. This isn’t meant as a criticism. But if you’re leading the hunt it’s a visual clue that he’s probably new to this and, in his excitement, he went to his local hunting store bought all the gear in an effort to look like one of the guys. It tells you to keep an eye on him and to be ready to offer quiet instruction so as not to embarrass him. I don’t fault Walz for clearly being inexperienced with firearms and hunting. Anyone who is proficient in either had to learn sometime. For most of us, I think, the scorn heaped upon him is due to the fraudulent nature of it all. What VP candidate takes a day off to go hunting? Well, they don’t unless they see it as a photo op. Dems realize Americans think Walz is a beta male weirdo, so some campaign genius said, “I got it! He’ll go hunting! He’ll look manly!” With the exception of “The Natural,” I generally hate sports movies because the lead actor usually looks like he’s never played sports in his life. Watching Walz handle a shotgun is like watching Keanu Reeves throw a football in “The Replacements.” It’s painful. (Robert Redford was believable as an aging baseball player because he clearly played the game as a boy. Same with Kevin Costner in “For the Love of the Game.”) In this video, Walz appears to be having difficulty loading his shotgun while on a pheasant hunt. He tells the reporter, whose questioning tone suggests she’s not buying any of this, that it’s a Beretta A400. The A400 is a semi-auto shotgun. Many guides don’t allow semi-autos on a hunt because they can’t see at a distance that you’re “safe.” A break-action double-barrel is therefore preferred since they can tell when your gun cannot be fired (be it loaded or not). This is because the barrel is on a hinge that “breaks” open to permit manual loading. And this is very important for safety. I would wager that most accidental shotgun deaths involve semi-autos. This is all the more important in pheasant hunting. Unlike, say, deer hunting where you might sit in a tree all day long by yourself, pheasant hunting is typically done in large groups where the hunters are arranged in a crescent and marched through a field toward “blockers,” that is, hunters who stand still in a line. The idea is to drive the birds into the blockers and force them to flight. Hunting in such close proximity with other hunters can be dangerous for a variety of reasons: the birds fly parallel to the ground at head level, excitable hunters start blasting away at everything that moves or don’t wait for the birds to reach a safe height, accidental discharges, etc. A guide wants to see that your weapon is open and therefore inoperable in all but the hunt. The loading port on the A400 is beneath the weapon near the trigger guard. This type of loading is an acquired skill, and Walz doesn’t have it. (I’ll add that Walz says he bought it for trap shooting. In this he is correct. I wouldn’t want to use an A400 pheasant hunting. It’s not a field gun. It’s heavy. But it’s excellent for clays.) He fumbles around and, sensing he’s making a fool of himself, he appears to stop before he’s managed to get it loaded. As you can see, this carefully choreographed hunt wasn’t so carefully choreographed. It’s become Tim Walz’s Michael Dukakis-in-the-tank moment. It’s also noteworthy that in this gaffe Democrats, for all their faux rage about “toxic masculinity,” unwittingly pay homage to masculinity and its appeal. They do know what it is. They just don’t know how to practice it.

Larry Alex Taunton

1,727,161 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨EXPOSED: How Tyler Bowyer is ALLEGEDLY Using TPUSA Donor Money to SEIZE the Utility that Stole His FAMILY'S Land. Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of Turning Point Action Tyler Bowyer is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing Turning Point Action's donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta with the SRP (Salt River Project) and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. Myself and MIA have been pulling countless court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and corporate filings. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of Turning Point USA donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. 🚨 THE BIGGEST POLITICAL HEIST IN AMERICA IS BEING RUN BY ONE MAN, AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT. 🚨 Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of a massive conservative PAC is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing the Turning Point PAC (Turning Point Action) donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta, potentially orchestrate a massive real estate payday for his own family, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. And he is trampling on the memory of the movement's founder to do it. We have spent weeks pulling court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and photographs. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of PAC donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. PART 2: THE 20-YEAR VENDETTA & THE "EASEMENT" PAYOFF [THE FACTS]:Tyler Bowyer omitted a massive, damning conflict of interest from the press and his donors. His grandfather, Ray Leonard Bowyer, worked for SRP for 25 years in the Water Operations Division. But it gets much darker. We pulled Maricopa County Superior Court minute entries and legal notices (Case No. CV2005-003419). In 2005, SRP filed an Eminent Domain lawsuit against Ray L. Bowyer, acting as the Trustee of his family’s trust. SRP forcefully condemned and seized Parcel No. 304-64-010B from the Bowyer family. U.S. Home Corp (a massive developer) was a co-defendant. The court minute entries reveal a legal slaughter: SRP aggressively changed judges right out of the gate. At the final hearing, SRP brought their top Senior Engineer, Freddie Dobbins Jr., to testify to the "necessity" of taking the land. The Bowyer family didn't even show up. They were unrepresented and steamrolled by the utility's legal machine. Crucially, the court records we have obtained thus far do not specify whether SRP used eminent domain to seize the full property outright, or if they only took a portion of it by forcing an "easement" across the land. [THE SPECULATION]:SRP didn't just take a piece of dirt; they destroyed a multi-million dollar family real estate deal. If SRP only forced an easement, the Bowyer family trust is still legally and financially tethered to that land. We theorize that Tyler Bowyer is weaponizing millions in unsuspecting PAC donor money to execute a hostile takeover of the utility that humiliated his family. If his slate wins, his family will be sitting across the negotiating table from people he put in power. That board can authorize massive payouts to buy the rest of the land, renegotiate the easement terms, or route new infrastructure through it. Tyler Bowyer's family could come out with a huge, undisclosed real estate payday funded by the very utility he is taking over. PART 3: THE TROJAN HORSE [THE FACTS]:Look at the top of the ticket that Bowyer's PAC endorsed. He is pushing Chris Dobson for SRP President. Chris Dobson is not a grassroots outsider—he is the current Vice President of the Salt River Project. [THE SPECULATION]:This is a corporate inside job. Bowyer isn't fighting the establishment; he is buying the boardroom. He is laundering political influence through his PAC to elevate the ultimate company insider, turning a public-private utility into a captive asset. PART 4: THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT (THE MEMORIAL EXPLOITATION) [THE FACTS]:On September 21, 2025, a memorial was held in Glendale for Charlie Kirk. Photographs from the event show that Turning Point Action set up voter registration booths right at the memorial. The booths featured massive banners reading "CHARLIE WANTS YOU TO REGISTER TO VOTE" and were actively used to register attendees for the obscure SRP board elections. [THE SPECULATION]:This is where the moral bankruptcy of this syndicate is fully exposed. It is wrong on so many levels. While everyday conservatives and loved ones were mourning the tragic loss of a movement leader, Tyler Bowyer and TPAction were exploiting the crowd. Instead of worrying about memorializing Charlie with the respect he deserved, they were concerned with selling merch and using a funeral as a voter-harvesting event for their corporate utility takeover. They hijacked a tragedy to fund a family vendetta. PART 5: THE DOUBLE PAYOFF (THE SLUSH FUNDS) If Bowyer successfully uses Turning Point Donor money to win this board, he doesn't just get revenge—he unlocks two massive, multi-million dollar slush funds for his allies. PAYOUT 1: THE GRID [THE FACTS]: Erika Kirk (CEO of TPUSA) has a mother named Lori Frantzve. Lori Frantzve is the CEO of AZ Tech International and G-TEK Industries. Her specialty? EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) protection and grid hardening. She has formally pitched the Arizona State Legislature on this exact need. [THE SPECULATION]: The newly installed, Bowyer-controlled board could turn around and award massive, multi-million dollar "Grid Hardening" contracts directly to the mother of TPUSA’s CEO. PAYOUT 2: THE 20-YEAR FORESTRY EMPIRE [THE FACTS]: We pulled a 2019 U.S. Senate Committee Statement regarding SRP. SRP doesn't just manage water; they heavily influence the management of a 13,000 square-mile watershed spanning five national forests. The document reveals that SRP signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ensuring they get to "participate in the development... and review the selected contractors" for massive 20-year federal forest thinning projects. Just clearing the tiny Cragin watershed alone is estimated at $27 million. Furthermore, SRP lobbies for contracts to be paid out based on "avoided costs" (hypothetical prevented disaster savings) rather than the actual value of timber removed. [THE SPECULATION]: Whoever controls the SRP board controls the gatekeeping for 20-year federal forestry contracts. This is the ultimate untraceable government payout. Tyler Bowyer's syndicate can funnel tens of millions in federal land management contracts to allied construction and clearing firms using these "cost avoidance" metrics. PART 6: THE CORPORATE ARCHITECTURE & THE MORMON MAFIA [THE FACTS]:The Farnsworth family is a deeply entrenched network in Mesa, Arizona, and they provide the connective tissue for this entire operation: Jessica A. Farnsworth is currently a Process Analyst inside SRP. Chase Farnsworth is a Project Development Executive at Mortenson (a massive commercial construction firm), publicly monitoring and praising SRP's water releases. Dwayne Farnsworth is a corporate agent located right on Dobson Road. [THE SPECULATION]:To execute a takeover this large and route billions in grid hardening and federal forestry contracts, you need insiders, corporate builders, and legislative muscle. The Farnsworth network provides the architecture for Bowyer to move the money once the board is captured. THE BOTTOM LINE Conservative donors thought they were funding a grassroots PAC to save America. Instead, the evidence suggests their money is being used by Tyler Bowyer as a personal slush fund to execute a 20-year-old real estate revenge plot, launder political power for utility insiders, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in federal forestry and grid resilience contracts. And they are willing to step over Charlie's memorial to do it. The movement has been hijacked by one man running a corporate syndicate. It's time to follow the money, audit the grid contracts, and subpoena the watershed MOAs. 🇺🇸⚓️ Huge shoutout to the AMAZING MIA Who who teamed uop with me on this MASSIVE story. She's one of the best researchers out there and everyone should be FOLLOWING her!

🚨EXPOSED: How Tyler Bowyer is ALLEGEDLY Using TPUSA Donor Money to SEIZE the Utility that Stole His FAMILY'S Land. Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of Turning Point Action Tyler Bowyer is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing Turning Point Action's donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta with the SRP (Salt River Project) and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. Myself and MIA have been pulling countless court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and corporate filings. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of Turning Point USA donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. 🚨 THE BIGGEST POLITICAL HEIST IN AMERICA IS BEING RUN BY ONE MAN, AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT. 🚨 Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of a massive conservative PAC is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing the Turning Point PAC (Turning Point Action) donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta, potentially orchestrate a massive real estate payday for his own family, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. And he is trampling on the memory of the movement's founder to do it. We have spent weeks pulling court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and photographs. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of PAC donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. PART 2: THE 20-YEAR VENDETTA & THE "EASEMENT" PAYOFF [THE FACTS]:Tyler Bowyer omitted a massive, damning conflict of interest from the press and his donors. His grandfather, Ray Leonard Bowyer, worked for SRP for 25 years in the Water Operations Division. But it gets much darker. We pulled Maricopa County Superior Court minute entries and legal notices (Case No. CV2005-003419). In 2005, SRP filed an Eminent Domain lawsuit against Ray L. Bowyer, acting as the Trustee of his family’s trust. SRP forcefully condemned and seized Parcel No. 304-64-010B from the Bowyer family. U.S. Home Corp (a massive developer) was a co-defendant. The court minute entries reveal a legal slaughter: SRP aggressively changed judges right out of the gate. At the final hearing, SRP brought their top Senior Engineer, Freddie Dobbins Jr., to testify to the "necessity" of taking the land. The Bowyer family didn't even show up. They were unrepresented and steamrolled by the utility's legal machine. Crucially, the court records we have obtained thus far do not specify whether SRP used eminent domain to seize the full property outright, or if they only took a portion of it by forcing an "easement" across the land. [THE SPECULATION]:SRP didn't just take a piece of dirt; they destroyed a multi-million dollar family real estate deal. If SRP only forced an easement, the Bowyer family trust is still legally and financially tethered to that land. We theorize that Tyler Bowyer is weaponizing millions in unsuspecting PAC donor money to execute a hostile takeover of the utility that humiliated his family. If his slate wins, his family will be sitting across the negotiating table from people he put in power. That board can authorize massive payouts to buy the rest of the land, renegotiate the easement terms, or route new infrastructure through it. Tyler Bowyer's family could come out with a huge, undisclosed real estate payday funded by the very utility he is taking over. PART 3: THE TROJAN HORSE [THE FACTS]:Look at the top of the ticket that Bowyer's PAC endorsed. He is pushing Chris Dobson for SRP President. Chris Dobson is not a grassroots outsider—he is the current Vice President of the Salt River Project. [THE SPECULATION]:This is a corporate inside job. Bowyer isn't fighting the establishment; he is buying the boardroom. He is laundering political influence through his PAC to elevate the ultimate company insider, turning a public-private utility into a captive asset. PART 4: THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT (THE MEMORIAL EXPLOITATION) [THE FACTS]:On September 21, 2025, a memorial was held in Glendale for Charlie Kirk. Photographs from the event show that Turning Point Action set up voter registration booths right at the memorial. The booths featured massive banners reading "CHARLIE WANTS YOU TO REGISTER TO VOTE" and were actively used to register attendees for the obscure SRP board elections. [THE SPECULATION]:This is where the moral bankruptcy of this syndicate is fully exposed. It is wrong on so many levels. While everyday conservatives and loved ones were mourning the tragic loss of a movement leader, Tyler Bowyer and TPAction were exploiting the crowd. Instead of worrying about memorializing Charlie with the respect he deserved, they were concerned with selling merch and using a funeral as a voter-harvesting event for their corporate utility takeover. They hijacked a tragedy to fund a family vendetta. PART 5: THE DOUBLE PAYOFF (THE SLUSH FUNDS) If Bowyer successfully uses Turning Point Donor money to win this board, he doesn't just get revenge—he unlocks two massive, multi-million dollar slush funds for his allies. PAYOUT 1: THE GRID [THE FACTS]: Erika Kirk (CEO of TPUSA) has a mother named Lori Frantzve. Lori Frantzve is the CEO of AZ Tech International and G-TEK Industries. Her specialty? EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) protection and grid hardening. She has formally pitched the Arizona State Legislature on this exact need. [THE SPECULATION]: The newly installed, Bowyer-controlled board could turn around and award massive, multi-million dollar "Grid Hardening" contracts directly to the mother of TPUSA’s CEO. PAYOUT 2: THE 20-YEAR FORESTRY EMPIRE [THE FACTS]: We pulled a 2019 U.S. Senate Committee Statement regarding SRP. SRP doesn't just manage water; they heavily influence the management of a 13,000 square-mile watershed spanning five national forests. The document reveals that SRP signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ensuring they get to "participate in the development... and review the selected contractors" for massive 20-year federal forest thinning projects. Just clearing the tiny Cragin watershed alone is estimated at $27 million. Furthermore, SRP lobbies for contracts to be paid out based on "avoided costs" (hypothetical prevented disaster savings) rather than the actual value of timber removed. [THE SPECULATION]: Whoever controls the SRP board controls the gatekeeping for 20-year federal forestry contracts. This is the ultimate untraceable government payout. Tyler Bowyer's syndicate can funnel tens of millions in federal land management contracts to allied construction and clearing firms using these "cost avoidance" metrics. PART 6: THE CORPORATE ARCHITECTURE & THE MORMON MAFIA [THE FACTS]:The Farnsworth family is a deeply entrenched network in Mesa, Arizona, and they provide the connective tissue for this entire operation: Jessica A. Farnsworth is currently a Process Analyst inside SRP. Chase Farnsworth is a Project Development Executive at Mortenson (a massive commercial construction firm), publicly monitoring and praising SRP's water releases. Dwayne Farnsworth is a corporate agent located right on Dobson Road. [THE SPECULATION]:To execute a takeover this large and route billions in grid hardening and federal forestry contracts, you need insiders, corporate builders, and legislative muscle. The Farnsworth network provides the architecture for Bowyer to move the money once the board is captured. THE BOTTOM LINE Conservative donors thought they were funding a grassroots PAC to save America. Instead, the evidence suggests their money is being used by Tyler Bowyer as a personal slush fund to execute a 20-year-old real estate revenge plot, launder political power for utility insiders, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in federal forestry and grid resilience contracts. And they are willing to step over Charlie's memorial to do it. The movement has been hijacked by one man running a corporate syndicate. It's time to follow the money, audit the grid contracts, and subpoena the watershed MOAs. 🇺🇸⚓️ Huge shoutout to the AMAZING MIA Who who teamed uop with me on this MASSIVE story. She's one of the best researchers out there and everyone should be FOLLOWING her!

Project Constitution

129,996 次观看 • 5 个月前