Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

𝗠𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗰𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮: It rolled out July 2004. From 2006 – July 2008: 12 deaths. ALL 12 in vaccinated kids. ZERO in unvaccinated. This vaccine wanes in ~ 7 months. Doesn't match strains. Risks poorly studied. Why risk it? Dr Suzanne Humphries

CHDTV Live

4,263 subscribers

18,711 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a compelling case on why the measles vaccine narrative isn’t as simple as it seems. Drawing from peer-reviewed literature and CDC data, she challenges the push for 95-99% vaccination rates to achieve herd immunity, arguing the vaccine has failed to eradicate measles and may be creating new vulnerabilities. In her presentation, Dr. Humphries dissects the 2015 California measles outbreak, often cited as proof of the need for near-universal vaccination. Of 110 cases, only 49 were unvaccinated, with 12 too young for the vaccine and 9 sick when it was due. Notably, 12% of cases were vaccinated, and one case was a vaccine strain, later removed from the count. Before the vaccine, measles primarily affected children aged 3-15, who gained lifelong immunity. Natural immunity from mothers protected babies under 2, the most vulnerable group. Post-vaccination, vaccinated mothers pass limited immunity—sometimes just 3 months—leaving infants exposed. Older adults, once protected by natural immunity and boosted by circulating virus, are now at risk. In California, 56% of cases were over 20, and 11 were infants under 1. Dr. Humphries argues the vaccine shifts vulnerability to the very groups least equipped to handle measles. Citing LeBaron’s peer-reviewed study, Dr. Humphries notes that 33% of people lack protective measles antibodies 20 years post-vaccination. This secondary failure means many adults, including those over 50, may need boosters—a sign the vaccine’s protection wanes over time. Dr. Humphries highlights primary vaccine failure (2-8% of twice-vaccinated people never respond) and secondary failure (waning immunity). She also points to vaccine escape mutants, like those in China, which evade the vaccine’s protection, a growing concern in the literature. Referencing a 1998 study by Damien, Dr. Humphries notes that 22-33% of twice-vaccinated high school students showed inadequate immunity during a measles epidemic, with secondary immune responses indicating viral replication and potential contagiousness. Russian studies cited by Dr. Humphries show hospitalized patients, fully vaccinated, lacking sufficient titers during epidemics. Even with high vaccination rates, herd immunity remains elusive, and outbreaks persist, prompting experts like Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic to call for a new vaccine. Dr. Humphries urges doctors and the public to look beyond the “unvaccinated” scapegoat and consider the vaccine’s limitations. With primary and secondary failures, waning immunity, and emerging mutants, the current approach may not deliver the promised protection. For more details, Dr. Humphries offers to share peer-reviewed sources and CDC data, encouraging a deeper dive into the complex reality of measles and vaccination. This is a call for critical thinking and honest discussion about public health strategies.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a compelling case on why the measles vaccine narrative isn’t as simple as it seems. Drawing from peer-reviewed literature and CDC data, she challenges the push for 95-99% vaccination rates to achieve herd immunity, arguing the vaccine has failed to eradicate measles and may be creating new vulnerabilities. In her presentation, Dr. Humphries dissects the 2015 California measles outbreak, often cited as proof of the need for near-universal vaccination. Of 110 cases, only 49 were unvaccinated, with 12 too young for the vaccine and 9 sick when it was due. Notably, 12% of cases were vaccinated, and one case was a vaccine strain, later removed from the count. Before the vaccine, measles primarily affected children aged 3-15, who gained lifelong immunity. Natural immunity from mothers protected babies under 2, the most vulnerable group. Post-vaccination, vaccinated mothers pass limited immunity—sometimes just 3 months—leaving infants exposed. Older adults, once protected by natural immunity and boosted by circulating virus, are now at risk. In California, 56% of cases were over 20, and 11 were infants under 1. Dr. Humphries argues the vaccine shifts vulnerability to the very groups least equipped to handle measles. Citing LeBaron’s peer-reviewed study, Dr. Humphries notes that 33% of people lack protective measles antibodies 20 years post-vaccination. This secondary failure means many adults, including those over 50, may need boosters—a sign the vaccine’s protection wanes over time. Dr. Humphries highlights primary vaccine failure (2-8% of twice-vaccinated people never respond) and secondary failure (waning immunity). She also points to vaccine escape mutants, like those in China, which evade the vaccine’s protection, a growing concern in the literature. Referencing a 1998 study by Damien, Dr. Humphries notes that 22-33% of twice-vaccinated high school students showed inadequate immunity during a measles epidemic, with secondary immune responses indicating viral replication and potential contagiousness. Russian studies cited by Dr. Humphries show hospitalized patients, fully vaccinated, lacking sufficient titers during epidemics. Even with high vaccination rates, herd immunity remains elusive, and outbreaks persist, prompting experts like Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic to call for a new vaccine. Dr. Humphries urges doctors and the public to look beyond the “unvaccinated” scapegoat and consider the vaccine’s limitations. With primary and secondary failures, waning immunity, and emerging mutants, the current approach may not deliver the promised protection. For more details, Dr. Humphries offers to share peer-reviewed sources and CDC data, encouraging a deeper dive into the complex reality of measles and vaccination. This is a call for critical thinking and honest discussion about public health strategies.

Camus

60,248 просмотров • 1 год назад

Another COVID ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Becomes True It turns out the deaths from COVID vaccinated patients were actually labeled as unvaccinated. “That’s why ‘unvaccinated’ deaths spiked immediately after the vaccine rollout,” explained Dr. Toby Rogers. “That’s how they hid COVID vaccine deaths and kept the rollout going.” Roger’s tweet mentioned a Substack post from Thursday titled “Where Are The Numbers” by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil. These professors, in their own words, “challenge the global Covid-19 narrative, exposing the use and abuse of statistics.” That’s an eloquent way of saying the results were SKEWED to sell a narrative.

Another COVID ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Becomes True It turns out the deaths from COVID vaccinated patients were actually labeled as unvaccinated. “That’s why ‘unvaccinated’ deaths spiked immediately after the vaccine rollout,” explained Dr. Toby Rogers. “That’s how they hid COVID vaccine deaths and kept the rollout going.” Roger’s tweet mentioned a Substack post from Thursday titled “Where Are The Numbers” by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil. These professors, in their own words, “challenge the global Covid-19 narrative, exposing the use and abuse of statistics.” That’s an eloquent way of saying the results were SKEWED to sell a narrative.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

817,097 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Issues a Wake-Up Call on Vaccines: Time to Question, Not Blindly Follow Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a respected voice in medical critique, is urging a deeper examination of vaccines, challenging the mantra that they are universally safe, effective, and necessary. Her powerful testimony highlights critical issues that demand attention from parents, doctors, and policymakers. "Every vaccine carries a risk-benefit ratio, and the impact can affect any organ in the body," Dr. Humphries warns. She emphasizes that not all vaccines are created equal—herd immunity, often touted as a universal benefit, is not guaranteed for every vaccine and is not even part of some vaccines' design. This calls for a case-by-case evaluation, not blanket acceptance. Taking aim at the whooping cough vaccine, Dr. Humphries points to troubling evidence: mutant strains of the bacteria have emerged in vaccinated populations. "This is a vaccine that needs critical scrutiny," she insists, urging informed discussions between parents and doctors about its risks and shortcomings. The rise of these strains raises questions about the vaccine’s long-term efficacy and its role in shaping bacterial evolution. Dr. Humphries is clear: dogmatic repetition of vaccine safety slogans ignores real harm. "People are getting very sick, and lives are lost without compensation or accountability," she states. Her call is not for rejection but for transparency, rigorous science, and honest dialogue. It is time to move beyond blind trust. Parents deserve full disclosure. Doctors must engage with the data. Policymakers owe the public accountability.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Issues a Wake-Up Call on Vaccines: Time to Question, Not Blindly Follow Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a respected voice in medical critique, is urging a deeper examination of vaccines, challenging the mantra that they are universally safe, effective, and necessary. Her powerful testimony highlights critical issues that demand attention from parents, doctors, and policymakers. "Every vaccine carries a risk-benefit ratio, and the impact can affect any organ in the body," Dr. Humphries warns. She emphasizes that not all vaccines are created equal—herd immunity, often touted as a universal benefit, is not guaranteed for every vaccine and is not even part of some vaccines' design. This calls for a case-by-case evaluation, not blanket acceptance. Taking aim at the whooping cough vaccine, Dr. Humphries points to troubling evidence: mutant strains of the bacteria have emerged in vaccinated populations. "This is a vaccine that needs critical scrutiny," she insists, urging informed discussions between parents and doctors about its risks and shortcomings. The rise of these strains raises questions about the vaccine’s long-term efficacy and its role in shaping bacterial evolution. Dr. Humphries is clear: dogmatic repetition of vaccine safety slogans ignores real harm. "People are getting very sick, and lives are lost without compensation or accountability," she states. Her call is not for rejection but for transparency, rigorous science, and honest dialogue. It is time to move beyond blind trust. Parents deserve full disclosure. Doctors must engage with the data. Policymakers owe the public accountability.

Camus

22,554 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr. addresses if he will be removing the Covid vaccine as a mandatory shot for children. “President Trump doesn't believe that anybody should get mandatory vaccines.” “The covid vaccine recommendation for children was always dubious.” “Kids had almost no risk for Covid.” “So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk.” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out from Pfizer.” “There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.”

RFK Jr. addresses if he will be removing the Covid vaccine as a mandatory shot for children. “President Trump doesn't believe that anybody should get mandatory vaccines.” “The covid vaccine recommendation for children was always dubious.” “Kids had almost no risk for Covid.” “So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk.” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out from Pfizer.” “There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.”

End Tribalism in Politics

152,296 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨ALARMING HARM: HPV Vaccine INCREASES HPV Rates & Ovarian Damage in Girls – Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD The Gardasil HPV vaccine doesn’t even prevent HPV. Florida’s Medicaid database was analyzed, comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated girls. The results are alarming: - Vaccinated girls showed much higher rates of ovarian dysfunction and female reproductive disorders. - They also had a greater risk/level of HPV infection itself compared to the unvaccinated group. Dr. Hooker: “We see much, much higher levels of these issues in the individuals that received the vaccine…” Why are we giving this to our children? A vaccine that fails to prevent the very infection it targets — and increases serious reproductive risks instead? Parents, this is from the actual data. Do your research before the next “routine” shot. The HPV rollout continues… but the science from this comparison demands answers. Share this. Question everything. Protect our children.

🚨ALARMING HARM: HPV Vaccine INCREASES HPV Rates & Ovarian Damage in Girls – Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD The Gardasil HPV vaccine doesn’t even prevent HPV. Florida’s Medicaid database was analyzed, comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated girls. The results are alarming: - Vaccinated girls showed much higher rates of ovarian dysfunction and female reproductive disorders. - They also had a greater risk/level of HPV infection itself compared to the unvaccinated group. Dr. Hooker: “We see much, much higher levels of these issues in the individuals that received the vaccine…” Why are we giving this to our children? A vaccine that fails to prevent the very infection it targets — and increases serious reproductive risks instead? Parents, this is from the actual data. Do your research before the next “routine” shot. The HPV rollout continues… but the science from this comparison demands answers. Share this. Question everything. Protect our children.

Valerie Anne Smith

184,420 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dr. Marty Makary (FDA Commissioner) just went nuclear: "I know of three people who died from the COVID vaccine. Died from the vaccine." He says it's not rare case reports—it's people we all know. A South Florida cardiologist told him he's seen "scores" of cardiac complications post-shot. In this 1:44 clip [link to video], he calls the whole pandemic response a "pandemic of lunacy": - Cloth masks that "did nothing" (you breathe right through the pores) - Kicking unvaccinated kids out of school - Giving grandma false hope from ineffective protection - Censoring real vaccine injury stories on Facebook & by the White House His verdict: Nuanced risks got buried, natural immunity ignored, evolving strains downplayed—pure misinformation from the top. His verdict: Nuanced risks got buried, natural immunity ignored, evolving strains downplayed—pure misinformation from the top. Was it all necessary caution... or the biggest overreach in modern medicine?

Dr. Marty Makary (FDA Commissioner) just went nuclear: "I know of three people who died from the COVID vaccine. Died from the vaccine." He says it's not rare case reports—it's people we all know. A South Florida cardiologist told him he's seen "scores" of cardiac complications post-shot. In this 1:44 clip [link to video], he calls the whole pandemic response a "pandemic of lunacy": - Cloth masks that "did nothing" (you breathe right through the pores) - Kicking unvaccinated kids out of school - Giving grandma false hope from ineffective protection - Censoring real vaccine injury stories on Facebook & by the White House His verdict: Nuanced risks got buried, natural immunity ignored, evolving strains downplayed—pure misinformation from the top. His verdict: Nuanced risks got buried, natural immunity ignored, evolving strains downplayed—pure misinformation from the top. Was it all necessary caution... or the biggest overreach in modern medicine?

Camus

140,152 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Reminder - RFK Jr: "Pfizer knew they were going to kill a lot of people, and they did it anyway" Pfizer LIED on their clinical trial data. They knew the vaccine would kill people, and they did it anyway. Meet Maddie de Garay. 11 years old. One of 1,100 kids in the trial. Immediate fever, then seizures. Now in a wheelchair for life. On a feeding tube. A fate worse than death. For a child with ZERO risk from COVID. And they want to give this to 76 MILLION children. The math is terrifying. Extrapolate that one severe injury in 1,100 kids? That’s potentially 70,000 children catastrophically injured. It gets worse. Pfizer’s own data shows: • 20 all-cause deaths in the vaxxed group vs. 14 in placebo. • 5 heart attacks in vaxxed vs. 1 in placebo. A 500% greater chance of dying from a heart attack if you’re vaccinated. 17,000 recorded deaths in the US in 8 months. The real number is likely 40X HIGHER. More deaths than from all vaccines in the last 30 years COMBINED. And the benefit? ZERO. After six months, the vaxxed are MORE likely to get COVID than the unvaxxed. This is the greatest criminal deception of our time. They sacrificed our children for profit.

Reminder - RFK Jr: "Pfizer knew they were going to kill a lot of people, and they did it anyway" Pfizer LIED on their clinical trial data. They knew the vaccine would kill people, and they did it anyway. Meet Maddie de Garay. 11 years old. One of 1,100 kids in the trial. Immediate fever, then seizures. Now in a wheelchair for life. On a feeding tube. A fate worse than death. For a child with ZERO risk from COVID. And they want to give this to 76 MILLION children. The math is terrifying. Extrapolate that one severe injury in 1,100 kids? That’s potentially 70,000 children catastrophically injured. It gets worse. Pfizer’s own data shows: • 20 all-cause deaths in the vaxxed group vs. 14 in placebo. • 5 heart attacks in vaxxed vs. 1 in placebo. A 500% greater chance of dying from a heart attack if you’re vaccinated. 17,000 recorded deaths in the US in 8 months. The real number is likely 40X HIGHER. More deaths than from all vaccines in the last 30 years COMBINED. And the benefit? ZERO. After six months, the vaxxed are MORE likely to get COVID than the unvaxxed. This is the greatest criminal deception of our time. They sacrificed our children for profit.

Camus

480,095 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The 1986 vaccine law was a catastrophe. Dr. Suzanne Humphries EXPOSED its dire consequences to Joe Rogan—including the introduction of mRNA shots in 2021. “Before 1986 … there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance.” “So they went to the government and said, we need you to indemnify us.” “After they get their foot in the door, they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible” for compensation. “The qualification tables got narrowed down, because in the beginning, they were paying out so much.” “Not only did it make the vaccine companies very wealthy and indemnified, but the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.” “After that, they could add different adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine ‘works better.’” “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.” “That wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for this indemnification.” Joe Rogan Dr Suzanne Humphries

The 1986 vaccine law was a catastrophe. Dr. Suzanne Humphries EXPOSED its dire consequences to Joe Rogan—including the introduction of mRNA shots in 2021. “Before 1986 … there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance.” “So they went to the government and said, we need you to indemnify us.” “After they get their foot in the door, they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible” for compensation. “The qualification tables got narrowed down, because in the beginning, they were paying out so much.” “Not only did it make the vaccine companies very wealthy and indemnified, but the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.” “After that, they could add different adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine ‘works better.’” “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.” “That wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for this indemnification.” Joe Rogan Dr Suzanne Humphries

Holden Culotta

24,256 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BOMBSHELL FROM JAPAN — THEY CAN’T HIDE THIS ANYMORE Professor Robert Clancy just dropped the receipts: A massive Japanese study tracking 20 MILLION people found that ALL excess deaths were in the vaccinated group. The unvaccinated group? ZERO excess deaths. And here’s the killer detail: mortality surges exactly 3 months after every booster — with peak deaths hitting around 100 days post-vaccination. The pattern is undeniable. In my opinion, they can no longer suppress the information on the COVID vaccine. The data is out. The cover-up is crumbling. The world needs to see this. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING MR POOL

🚨 BOMBSHELL FROM JAPAN — THEY CAN’T HIDE THIS ANYMORE Professor Robert Clancy just dropped the receipts: A massive Japanese study tracking 20 MILLION people found that ALL excess deaths were in the vaccinated group. The unvaccinated group? ZERO excess deaths. And here’s the killer detail: mortality surges exactly 3 months after every booster — with peak deaths hitting around 100 days post-vaccination. The pattern is undeniable. In my opinion, they can no longer suppress the information on the COVID vaccine. The data is out. The cover-up is crumbling. The world needs to see this. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING MR POOL

WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️

546,367 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

RFK Jr.: "The 'vaccinated' vs. 'unvaccinated' data is the biggest statistical trick of this pandemic. Here’s the deception: You are NOT counted as "vaccinated" until 2 weeks after your 2nd shot. For the first 6 weeks, the vaccine is ineffective. Infection & death rates rise. But all those deaths are attributed to the "unvaccinated" group. This creates an illusion of high efficacy for the first 2 months. Then, the protection falls off a cliff. By month 7, efficacy doesn't just hit zero—it plummets into negative territory. That means you are more likely to get COVID than someone who never took the vaccine. This isn't a theory. This is the data, and it's holding up across every country in the world. They sold us a temporary shield that ultimately makes us more vulnerable, and then they rigged the stats to hide the decline."

RFK Jr.: "The 'vaccinated' vs. 'unvaccinated' data is the biggest statistical trick of this pandemic. Here’s the deception: You are NOT counted as "vaccinated" until 2 weeks after your 2nd shot. For the first 6 weeks, the vaccine is ineffective. Infection & death rates rise. But all those deaths are attributed to the "unvaccinated" group. This creates an illusion of high efficacy for the first 2 months. Then, the protection falls off a cliff. By month 7, efficacy doesn't just hit zero—it plummets into negative territory. That means you are more likely to get COVID than someone who never took the vaccine. This isn't a theory. This is the data, and it's holding up across every country in the world. They sold us a temporary shield that ultimately makes us more vulnerable, and then they rigged the stats to hide the decline."

Camus

1,759,338 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"If people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine" RFK Jr on Pfizer's Clinical Trial data: "Your chance of dying of a heart attack [is] 500% greater than if you're unvaccinated" "people need to [understand this] criminal deception that has been imposed upon them". TRANSCRIPT: ROBERT F KENNEDY Jr: "The death rates from this vaccine, [there's] been more deaths in eight months [then in] all the billions of vaccines combined over the last 30 years.... from this one vaccine, 17,000 recorded deaths in the United States and we know the death rates [are] much higher than that, probably 40 times....the best math the best you know studies are showing that it's 40 times that.....so um you know the risks from the vaccine are [completely] untenable. "If people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine and then the benefits of the vaccine are apparently zero, or even sub zero after six months on the British data showing that the people who are vaccinated are actually more likely in many age categories to uh to get Covid and people who are unvaccinated uh which by the way was predicted" "We know that Pfizer knew this was going to happen because in their clinical trial [in] a six month clinical trial, was only six months, at the end of that period 20 people died in the vaccine group and only 14 in the placebo group.... of all cause mortality" "There were five heart attacks in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group... so your chance of dying of a heart attack, from that vaccine according to their own studies, is 500% greater than if you're unvaccinated" "So they knew they were going to kill a lot of people and they did it anyway... and people need to be able to see those studies [and] understand the deception, this, you know criminal deception that has been imposed upon them"

"If people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine" RFK Jr on Pfizer's Clinical Trial data: "Your chance of dying of a heart attack [is] 500% greater than if you're unvaccinated" "people need to [understand this] criminal deception that has been imposed upon them". TRANSCRIPT: ROBERT F KENNEDY Jr: "The death rates from this vaccine, [there's] been more deaths in eight months [then in] all the billions of vaccines combined over the last 30 years.... from this one vaccine, 17,000 recorded deaths in the United States and we know the death rates [are] much higher than that, probably 40 times....the best math the best you know studies are showing that it's 40 times that.....so um you know the risks from the vaccine are [completely] untenable. "If people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine and then the benefits of the vaccine are apparently zero, or even sub zero after six months on the British data showing that the people who are vaccinated are actually more likely in many age categories to uh to get Covid and people who are unvaccinated uh which by the way was predicted" "We know that Pfizer knew this was going to happen because in their clinical trial [in] a six month clinical trial, was only six months, at the end of that period 20 people died in the vaccine group and only 14 in the placebo group.... of all cause mortality" "There were five heart attacks in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group... so your chance of dying of a heart attack, from that vaccine according to their own studies, is 500% greater than if you're unvaccinated" "So they knew they were going to kill a lot of people and they did it anyway... and people need to be able to see those studies [and] understand the deception, this, you know criminal deception that has been imposed upon them"

Humanspective

69,939 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Dr. Brian Hooker’s Explosive Testimony Exposes Alarming Vaccine Safety Concerns In a powerful Senate testimony, Dr. Brian Hooker, Chief Scientific Officer at Children’s Health Defense and father of a severely vaccine-injured son, laid bare the unchecked expansion of the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule and its devastating consequences. His data-driven presentation demands urgent attention Since 1962, the childhood vaccine schedule has ballooned from 5 doses to a staggering 73 doses of 16 formulations by age 18 in 2023. Dr. Hooker revealed that after the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shielded manufacturers from liability, the schedule exploded without adequate safety oversight. Shockingly, the FDA approves vaccines individually with minimal testing, and the CDC has never studied the cumulative impact of the entire schedule on childhood health. Independent researchers, however, have stepped in where federal agencies have failed. The results are chilling. In a 2020 study co-authored by Dr. Hooker (Sage Open Medicine), vaccinated children (any vaccine in the first year) were compared to unvaccinated peers. The findings? Vaccinated kids were at least twice as likely to face developmental delays, ear infections, and GI disorders. Asthma diagnoses were 4.5x higher. A 2022 study by Joy Garner (Int’l Journal of Vaccine Theory) amplified these findings. Over 1,800 unvaccinated children from 46 states were compared to national averages (99.7% vaccinated). Unvaccinated kids had 4-20x lower rates of autoimmune, neurodevelopmental, and other disorders. Dr. Hooker also highlighted the myocarditis crisis tied to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. A 2022 PLOS Medicine study showed heightened myocarditis/pericarditis risks in males aged 12-39 within 7 days of Moderna shots. A 2021 NEJM study confirmed similar risks with Pfizer, especially in boys 16-19. Myocarditis is no minor issue—76% of cases reported to VAERS post-COVID vaccination required emergency care or hospitalization. Yet, the CDC downplays this life-threatening side effect, leaving families in the dark about real risks. Dr. Hooker underscored a systemic failure: the 1986 Act mandates HHS to report on vaccine safety to Congress every two years. In nearly 40 years, not a single report has been submitted. Federal agencies are derelict, leaving Americans vulnerable to debilitating vaccine injuries. “Vaccine injury is neither minor nor rare,” Dr. Hooker declared. His testimony, backed by rigorous data, exposes a public health system prioritizing corporate protection over children’s lives. The unvaccinated consistently show better health outcomes—why isn’t this being investigated? It’s time to demand accountability. Congress must enforce HHS compliance, fund comprehensive safety studies, and dismantle the liability shield that emboldens reckless expansion of the vaccine schedule. Share this thread to amplify Dr. Hooker’s urgent call to protect our children!

Dr. Brian Hooker’s Explosive Testimony Exposes Alarming Vaccine Safety Concerns In a powerful Senate testimony, Dr. Brian Hooker, Chief Scientific Officer at Children’s Health Defense and father of a severely vaccine-injured son, laid bare the unchecked expansion of the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule and its devastating consequences. His data-driven presentation demands urgent attention Since 1962, the childhood vaccine schedule has ballooned from 5 doses to a staggering 73 doses of 16 formulations by age 18 in 2023. Dr. Hooker revealed that after the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shielded manufacturers from liability, the schedule exploded without adequate safety oversight. Shockingly, the FDA approves vaccines individually with minimal testing, and the CDC has never studied the cumulative impact of the entire schedule on childhood health. Independent researchers, however, have stepped in where federal agencies have failed. The results are chilling. In a 2020 study co-authored by Dr. Hooker (Sage Open Medicine), vaccinated children (any vaccine in the first year) were compared to unvaccinated peers. The findings? Vaccinated kids were at least twice as likely to face developmental delays, ear infections, and GI disorders. Asthma diagnoses were 4.5x higher. A 2022 study by Joy Garner (Int’l Journal of Vaccine Theory) amplified these findings. Over 1,800 unvaccinated children from 46 states were compared to national averages (99.7% vaccinated). Unvaccinated kids had 4-20x lower rates of autoimmune, neurodevelopmental, and other disorders. Dr. Hooker also highlighted the myocarditis crisis tied to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. A 2022 PLOS Medicine study showed heightened myocarditis/pericarditis risks in males aged 12-39 within 7 days of Moderna shots. A 2021 NEJM study confirmed similar risks with Pfizer, especially in boys 16-19. Myocarditis is no minor issue—76% of cases reported to VAERS post-COVID vaccination required emergency care or hospitalization. Yet, the CDC downplays this life-threatening side effect, leaving families in the dark about real risks. Dr. Hooker underscored a systemic failure: the 1986 Act mandates HHS to report on vaccine safety to Congress every two years. In nearly 40 years, not a single report has been submitted. Federal agencies are derelict, leaving Americans vulnerable to debilitating vaccine injuries. “Vaccine injury is neither minor nor rare,” Dr. Hooker declared. His testimony, backed by rigorous data, exposes a public health system prioritizing corporate protection over children’s lives. The unvaccinated consistently show better health outcomes—why isn’t this being investigated? It’s time to demand accountability. Congress must enforce HHS compliance, fund comprehensive safety studies, and dismantle the liability shield that emboldens reckless expansion of the vaccine schedule. Share this thread to amplify Dr. Hooker’s urgent call to protect our children!

Camus

49,072 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Chief Health Officer is now trying to claim the Covid vaccine reduced all cause mortality. I.e. deaths from other causes apart from Covid. This is despite the fact that deaths jumped from 162,000 to 172,000 in 2021 and to 190,000 in 2022. Seriously you just can’t make this stuff up. When asked why deaths jumped they can’t give a straight answer. They are still looking into it. If they are still looking into it how they rule out the vaccines? In 2021 there were only 300 more Covid deaths than 2020 so Covid can’t explain the rise in deaths. It’s worth noting the jump in deaths occurred from May onwards, one month after the vaccine rollout. They are just insulting our intelligence at this point. The truth is that they are lying. #auspol

The Chief Health Officer is now trying to claim the Covid vaccine reduced all cause mortality. I.e. deaths from other causes apart from Covid. This is despite the fact that deaths jumped from 162,000 to 172,000 in 2021 and to 190,000 in 2022. Seriously you just can’t make this stuff up. When asked why deaths jumped they can’t give a straight answer. They are still looking into it. If they are still looking into it how they rule out the vaccines? In 2021 there were only 300 more Covid deaths than 2020 so Covid can’t explain the rise in deaths. It’s worth noting the jump in deaths occurred from May onwards, one month after the vaccine rollout. They are just insulting our intelligence at this point. The truth is that they are lying. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

113,926 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨RFK Jr Drops BOMBSHELL: The DEADLY Vaccine America Banned but Bill Gates STILL Pushes on 161 Million Kids 💉 The DTP shot (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) was pulled from America in the 80s because it was causing severe brain injury or death in 1 out of every 300 kids. But guess what? It’s still being given to 161 MILLION African children every year. Bill Gates claimed it “saved 30 million lives.” Denmark asked for proof. He had NONE. So Denmark studied 30 years of DTP data in Africa. The results? ➡️ Vaccinated girls were 10X more likely to die than unvaccinated girls. ➡️ They weren’t dying of tetanus or diphtheria… they were dying of anemia, malaria, pneumonia, pulmonary disease. ➡️ Why? Their immune systems were being wrecked by the vaccine. For 30 years, no one noticed it was the VACCINATED kids who were dying. This is negligence on a global scale. And the people funding it don’t want you to know.

🚨RFK Jr Drops BOMBSHELL: The DEADLY Vaccine America Banned but Bill Gates STILL Pushes on 161 Million Kids 💉 The DTP shot (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) was pulled from America in the 80s because it was causing severe brain injury or death in 1 out of every 300 kids. But guess what? It’s still being given to 161 MILLION African children every year. Bill Gates claimed it “saved 30 million lives.” Denmark asked for proof. He had NONE. So Denmark studied 30 years of DTP data in Africa. The results? ➡️ Vaccinated girls were 10X more likely to die than unvaccinated girls. ➡️ They weren’t dying of tetanus or diphtheria… they were dying of anemia, malaria, pneumonia, pulmonary disease. ➡️ Why? Their immune systems were being wrecked by the vaccine. For 30 years, no one noticed it was the VACCINATED kids who were dying. This is negligence on a global scale. And the people funding it don’t want you to know.

Project Constitution

19,843 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Aaron Siri breaks down why Dr. Scott's dismissal of a pivotal vaccine safety study is itself fundamentally flawed. Dr. Scott, labeled the Henry Ford Health System study "fatally flawed" due to "detection bias"—the idea that vaccinated kids seek more medical care and thus have more conditions diagnosed. But as Siri points out, had Dr. Scott actually read the submission, he would have seen the study authors specifically designed multiple sensitivity analyses to rule this exact bias out. Here’s what they found: 1. They Quantified Care-Seeking: Vaccinated children averaged 7 medical visits/year. Unvaccinated children averaged 2. This suggests less illness. However, the 17% of unvaccinated kids with a chronic issue averaged 5 visits/year—proving that when they were sick, they did go to the doctor. 2. They Removed the Healthiest Kids: To be ultra-conservative, the authors re-ran the analysis after removing all children who never sought medical care. This eliminated the healthiest unvaccinated cohort. The result? The statistically significant increase in chronic illness in the vaccinated group remained. 3. They Controlled for Duration: To ensure kids were observed equally long, they analyzed only children in the system from birth for 5+ years. The result? The risk ratio for chronic illness in the vaccinated group actually increased, further affirming the findings. 4. They Used a Control Condition: They looked at cancer rates—a condition not plausibly linked to vaccination. Here, they found no statistically significant difference, proving their method could tell a true signal from noise. Siri concludes: The establishment calls this study "flawed by design" not because of its methodology, but because of its outcome. It was designed by professionals to detect safety issues—and it found them. That is what makes it so threatening. The real fatal flaw isn't in the study's design—it's in the refusal to engage with its rigorous, validating evidence.

Aaron Siri breaks down why Dr. Scott's dismissal of a pivotal vaccine safety study is itself fundamentally flawed. Dr. Scott, labeled the Henry Ford Health System study "fatally flawed" due to "detection bias"—the idea that vaccinated kids seek more medical care and thus have more conditions diagnosed. But as Siri points out, had Dr. Scott actually read the submission, he would have seen the study authors specifically designed multiple sensitivity analyses to rule this exact bias out. Here’s what they found: 1. They Quantified Care-Seeking: Vaccinated children averaged 7 medical visits/year. Unvaccinated children averaged 2. This suggests less illness. However, the 17% of unvaccinated kids with a chronic issue averaged 5 visits/year—proving that when they were sick, they did go to the doctor. 2. They Removed the Healthiest Kids: To be ultra-conservative, the authors re-ran the analysis after removing all children who never sought medical care. This eliminated the healthiest unvaccinated cohort. The result? The statistically significant increase in chronic illness in the vaccinated group remained. 3. They Controlled for Duration: To ensure kids were observed equally long, they analyzed only children in the system from birth for 5+ years. The result? The risk ratio for chronic illness in the vaccinated group actually increased, further affirming the findings. 4. They Used a Control Condition: They looked at cancer rates—a condition not plausibly linked to vaccination. Here, they found no statistically significant difference, proving their method could tell a true signal from noise. Siri concludes: The establishment calls this study "flawed by design" not because of its methodology, but because of its outcome. It was designed by professionals to detect safety issues—and it found them. That is what makes it so threatening. The real fatal flaw isn't in the study's design—it's in the refusal to engage with its rigorous, validating evidence.

Camus

175,643 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

In 1986, Congress also gave vaccine manufacturers a legal liability shield for any harms caused by their products. This law, like the 2005 PREP Act, has had disastrous consequences—including the introduction of mRNA shots. Dr. Suzanne Humphries: “Before 1986 … there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance.” “So they went to the government and said, we need you to indemnify us.” “After they get their foot in the door, they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible” for compensation. “The qualification tables got narrowed down, because in the beginning, they were paying out so much.” “Not only did it make the vaccine companies very wealthy and indemnified, but the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.” “After that, they could add different adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine ‘works better.’” “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.” “That wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for this indemnification.” Joe Rogan Dr Suzanne Humphries

In 1986, Congress also gave vaccine manufacturers a legal liability shield for any harms caused by their products. This law, like the 2005 PREP Act, has had disastrous consequences—including the introduction of mRNA shots. Dr. Suzanne Humphries: “Before 1986 … there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance.” “So they went to the government and said, we need you to indemnify us.” “After they get their foot in the door, they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible” for compensation. “The qualification tables got narrowed down, because in the beginning, they were paying out so much.” “Not only did it make the vaccine companies very wealthy and indemnified, but the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.” “After that, they could add different adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine ‘works better.’” “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.” “That wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for this indemnification.” Joe Rogan Dr Suzanne Humphries

Holden Culotta

11,906 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sen. Ron Johnson: “Are there any studies on the Amish?” Dr. Brian Hooker: “The only cases of Autism in the Amish population were among adopted children who had been vaccinated BEFORE joining Amish families. ZERO cases in unvaccinated Amish-born kids.” This is devastating. An entire unvaccinated population with ZERO autism in their own children — until vaccines are introduced. Why isn’t this front-page news? Why has this data been buried? The Amish are living proof of what happens when you don’t inject infants with 70+ doses of vaccines. Our kids are being poisoned while they gaslight us and call it “coincidence.” This isn’t about “better diagnosis.” This is about what we’re injecting into our babies. Say NO to the shots... for your children & for yourself.

Sen. Ron Johnson: “Are there any studies on the Amish?” Dr. Brian Hooker: “The only cases of Autism in the Amish population were among adopted children who had been vaccinated BEFORE joining Amish families. ZERO cases in unvaccinated Amish-born kids.” This is devastating. An entire unvaccinated population with ZERO autism in their own children — until vaccines are introduced. Why isn’t this front-page news? Why has this data been buried? The Amish are living proof of what happens when you don’t inject infants with 70+ doses of vaccines. Our kids are being poisoned while they gaslight us and call it “coincidence.” This isn’t about “better diagnosis.” This is about what we’re injecting into our babies. Say NO to the shots... for your children & for yourself.

Valerie Anne Smith

231,922 просмотров • 19 дней назад

🧪 What’s really inside your child’s Hepatitis B vaccine? Dr. Suzanne Humphries just broke down the truth. Every new parent needs to hear this: “The Engerix vaccine from [GSK] contains 10 micrograms of antigen.” “It is made on yeast cells… programmed to produce the antigen.” “It has aluminum hydroxide, and it contains trace amounts of formaldehyde.” “It’s not listed as an excipient even though it has it.” “And this is supposed to be given on day one of birth to hours-old newborns if they’re premature.” “There will be 3 or more injections in infancy or childhood if that baby is immature.” “Because they say that first vaccine doesn’t count in low birth weight infants.” “The day-of-birth vaccine never counts towards the schedule and will still be given at one, two, three, and six months for those high-risk babies.” “In normal birth weight [and] low-risk infants, that first jab does count towards the total of 3 vaccines, but they’re usually given 4 anyway.” “The other vaccine is from Merck, and it is called Recombivax.” “It contains 5 micrograms of antigen.” “The FDA [treats them as] interchangeable even though one has more antigen than the other.” “So what I find really interesting about the Merck vaccine is that it actually contains 7.5 micrograms of formaldehyde.” “Which is greater than the 5 micrograms of actual antigen that’s in the vaccine.” “Yet we’re told that none of that matters, because your own body makes formaldehyde.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

🧪 What’s really inside your child’s Hepatitis B vaccine? Dr. Suzanne Humphries just broke down the truth. Every new parent needs to hear this: “The Engerix vaccine from [GSK] contains 10 micrograms of antigen.” “It is made on yeast cells… programmed to produce the antigen.” “It has aluminum hydroxide, and it contains trace amounts of formaldehyde.” “It’s not listed as an excipient even though it has it.” “And this is supposed to be given on day one of birth to hours-old newborns if they’re premature.” “There will be 3 or more injections in infancy or childhood if that baby is immature.” “Because they say that first vaccine doesn’t count in low birth weight infants.” “The day-of-birth vaccine never counts towards the schedule and will still be given at one, two, three, and six months for those high-risk babies.” “In normal birth weight [and] low-risk infants, that first jab does count towards the total of 3 vaccines, but they’re usually given 4 anyway.” “The other vaccine is from Merck, and it is called Recombivax.” “It contains 5 micrograms of antigen.” “The FDA [treats them as] interchangeable even though one has more antigen than the other.” “So what I find really interesting about the Merck vaccine is that it actually contains 7.5 micrograms of formaldehyde.” “Which is greater than the 5 micrograms of actual antigen that’s in the vaccine.” “Yet we’re told that none of that matters, because your own body makes formaldehyde.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

Children’s Health Defense

19,150 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

Camus

23,556 просмотров • 1 год назад