Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝗵𝗮𝘀 '𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘁' 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗮 𝗙𝗮𝘀𝗼. | 🇧🇫 🇷🇺 For those sitting at the back, here is a bit of history: In 1960 it was Russia under Khrushchev that opened up universities for African students who some later on became African Heads of States and Military Commanders....

128,358 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

There is no doubt that this man, Ibrahim Traoré, is the most popular African leader at the moment. He is a soldier who took over power in Burkina Faso and became president. His popularity highlights two key issues; the lack of faith in electoral democracy on the continent and the tragic failure of elected governments to deliver basic services to their citizens. Many political science scholars I have spoken to argue that perhaps the time has come for Africa to reflect on the type of governance that works for it. Today’s democracy is inherently foreign to how Africa was governed before colonial rule. Colonial rule brought immense cruelty to the natives, robbing them of their cattle and looting their resources. When colonialism ended, democracy was imposed as a prerequisite for independence in many African countries. Sadly, this project has largely failed, with success stories limited to just a handful of nations. Was it ever realistic to implement a one-size-fits-all approach across all 54 African countries without considering their unique local circumstances? Should Africans think about what might work in the absence of the many senseless rigged elections? Is it possible to get all stake holders on one table and instead govern together? Many thinkers have argued that Africa's governance systems were diverse before colonialism and often centered around local customs, traditions, and values. The imposition of Western-style democracy at independence did not consider these indigenous systems, and this disconnect has contributed to the challenges many African countries have faced in consolidating their democracies. Young Africans are looking at the style of governance in the Sahel region, particularly in Burkina Faso, where Ibrahim Traoré has revolutionised the country, implementing many changes that have greatly appealed to young Africans. Many young Africans are asking themselves if electoral democracy has not been part of the problems they have because it is easily manipulated and abused. “What has democracy done for Africa and Africans except feed the insatiable appetite to loot by Africa’s political elites,” many are now asking loudly! What is your view?

Hopewell Chin’ono

56,929 просмотров • 1 год назад

Russians are losing their faith in Trump… Here are some juicy examples: “Zelensky said that he was informed that American weapons began to arrive in Ukraine again. Terrorist Budanov, the head of the military intelligence of the HUR of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, said that the cooperation of the special services of Ukraine and the United States has been going on all this time without interruptions. Trump promised to tell some news for Russia on Monday. Bad. In Russia, on the basis of this news, they conclude: Trump abandoned [Russia]. Hopes for Trump were not justified. We just need to keep on fighting and forget about talking about a possible peace in the near future. We need to fight more and not believe Trump. “Trump Spring” did not bloom.” - Sergei Markov “Chewing snot and proclaiming “Trump is ours!” Etc., endless mantras that we benefit from the rule of this impulsive and no less inadequate grandfather than “sleepy Joe” are easily broken only by facts. In general, what difference does it make which enemies of Russia are in the White House, the U.S. Congress, elephants or donkeys? The U.S. Senate Armed Forces Committee approved the allocation of $500 million in military aid to Ukraine in 2026. This is $200 million more than in the current budget. The document guarantees military assistance to Ukraine at least until 2028.” - Voenkor Kotenok “If Trump resumes the supply of weapons to Zelinsky’s regime and tries to threaten us with extremely tough sanctions against Russia - it is necessary to turn all the power infrastructure of Ukraine and Ukrainian refineries into junk! Isn’t that right?” - Igor Korotchenko “The Kremlin did not criticize Trump for criticizing Putin. In Moscow, they took the U.S. President Donald Trump’s sharp statements against Vladimir Putin “quite calmly”, said the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov. “Trump, in general, has a rather rigid style in what phrases he uses and so on. We expect to continue our dialogue with Washington and our policy to repair quite broken bilateral relations,” Peskov said. Trump said that Putin “is talking nonsense” and “killed a lot of people”. He threatened to bomb Moscow “to hell”. The Kremlin is so afraid to make him angry. What a shame.” - TG channel “Агрегатор правды”

Natalka

28,401 просмотров • 1 год назад

In conversation with some comrades a few weeks ago, we reflected on how the painful contradiction with those who use hate and violence against foreign nationals, in order to mobilise popular support, extort money or pursue votes, is that they are bound to commit an inhumane act towards their own self-destruction. All of them, their downfall is the inhumanity of what they do, because at the core of what they are doing, is cruelty and inhumanity, and it is then when they will know that South African people are not hateful people. In 2008 it was the burning and necklacing of foreign nationals in painful images. In early 2021 it was the raiding of homes of innocent people like Ntate Victor Ramarafe in Dobsonville, or the extortion of foreign nationals who were legal in Alexandra, otherwise they were evicted from their homes. In Diepsloot it was killing of people like Elvis Nyathi and burning him alive after stealing money from his wife. More recently it was the blocking of women and children at the gates of schools and clinics in Soweto, the birth of children at gates of clinics in Tshwane and the stopping of South Africans from healthcare because they could not readily produce an ID. People are now looting food in their names, men are beating women in hair salons all in a build-up of a hostel-centric hate groups’ activities. The more human rights atrocities they commit, the quicker they engineer their self-destruction, because South Africans have an irrefutable instinct to be human. South African people cannot reconcile their hearts with violence being committed against innocent human beings, and this is the lesson these hate groups will learn. The toxicity of Twitter is not reality, no South African mother will support a woman giving birth on a pavement because they don’t have a passport. No man or woman will cheer as a human being burns alive because they could not say elbow in Nguni. No sane South African will support looting of shops of the food that YOU claimed was poisonous, leaving them with no close and readily available access to food. There is a reason why political parties who campaign on violence against foreign nationals collectively and combined cannot surpass 5% in a national vote - South African people inherently are not monsters. It is just sad that the self-destruction of these hate groups, first requires tragedy and casualties, but it is alway inevitable.

Sinawo Thambo

19,673 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The German embassy in Moscow once again called on Russia to end the war. In return, Russia called them "Nazi propagandists", jeered that the German ambassador's car drives on gas, and blamed Berlin for waging "an aggressive war" against Russia. ◾️On July 6, a video was published at the Facebook page of the German embassy in Russia. In it, Lena Hillmeier, head of the press office and second secretary at the German embassy in Russia, offered an solution to Russia's fuel problems: stop Russia's aggressive war against Ukraine. ◾️A week later, the German ambassador was summoned to Russia's foreign affairs ministry. He was told that "The slide of German agitprop's information and communications efforts into the style of the worst Nazi propaganda practices is immoral and provokes historically conditioned rejection and outrage among broad sections of the population in our country. At the same time, we were pleased to learn that the German ambassador will soon be returning home in a gasoline-powered car following the completion of his official mission." Zakharova also commented that "we [Russia] agree that it's time Berlin end its aggressive war through the hands of the Kyiv regime." She suggested that "concerned German diplomats" use public transportation. ◾️The German embassy reacted: "Today, Ambassador Alexander Graf Lambsdorff was summoned to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. During the meeting, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova criticized the publications of the German Embassy in Moscow, claiming they touch on "painful issues" for the Russian population. The summons was prompted by a widely viewed video from the Embassy about the fuel crisis in Russia caused by Russia's military aggression against Ukraine. The video calls on Russia to end the war, reflecting the well-known position of the German government and a demand for Russia repeatedly made by Germany and the EU. Attempts to obstruct the publication of the Embassy's materials, the content of which is factual, will be futile. The Embassy will continue to advocate for an end to the monstrous, aggressive war against Ukraine and to report on its consequences." Thank you, Germany, for standing with Ukraine! 🇩🇪🇺🇦

Anton Gerashchenko

90,363 просмотров • 22 дней назад

🇷🇺🇮🇱🇺🇦 Israeli military observer Yigal Levin criticizes Moscow’s strikes and writes: 🗣️ “Lately, Moscow has been trying more and more often to present its large-scale attacks as ‘retaliatory strikes.’ As if this is a response to Ukraine’s effective and massive attacks on Russian territory. Moreover, unlike Russia’s strikes on peaceful civilian objects, Ukraine targets oil refineries, military factories, ships, logistical hubs, arsenals, ports, army and FSB headquarters, etc. This thesis is absurd from the very beginning, because it was Russia that started the war. Accordingly, all of Ukraine’s actions are a reaction. That is, when Kyiv strikes Russia, it is actually responding to aggression. This is completely logical: war can never be a ‘one-sided game.’ If you decide to bomb someone, you must be prepared for them to bomb you back. Russia, on the other hand, behaves in an extremely infantile way — just like its citizens, who express surprise when explosions and strikes begin on their own territory as well. Instead of taking responsibility — yes, we started it, we are bombing, so what? — Moscow, like a frightened and confused teenager, tries to present its own strikes as ‘responses’… Responses to what? No special intelligence is needed to engage elementary logic: no one was bombing Russia and no one was preparing to do so until Russia itself started the war. What will happen next is quite clear: while Russia has been attacking with full force for a long time, using the same ‘Oreshnik’ for the third time already — Ukraine’s strikes will only intensify. In 2022, Ukraine struck weaker than in 2023; in 2024 — weaker than in 2025; and now it is 2026, when sometimes Kyiv’s strikes already surpass Moscow’s in terms of the scale of damage inflicted. War has its own inexorable logic of progression: Ukraine’s next strikes, the real retaliatory strikes, will be even more massive and powerful than they were at the beginning of the year. And yes, Russians should be endlessly grateful to Ukrainians for how they are conducting this war. For example, with the same FP-5 type drones that carry a ton of explosives, striking the civilian population would not be difficult at all. And yes, Ukraine has this capability. It has the capability, but Kyiv chooses not to take this path. And when the war ends, if I were in the Russians’ place, I would express gratitude and respect to Ukrainians precisely for this restraint. But as long as the war continues, every Russian citizen must clearly understand that strikes from Ukraine will only increase, and there is only one party responsible for all of this — the Kremlin. These are quite banal and obvious thoughts, but what can we do if Russian society continues to behave infantilely. The problem is that this infantilism is taking on a bloody form.” Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

105,566 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The “final nail in the coffin" for Russia’s energy influence in the Middle East: Iraq nationalises Russia's Lukoil oil field. Iraq has moved to nationalise Lukoil’s West Qurna-2 oil field, dealing a major blow to Russia’s energy revenues, Reuters reports. The company’s largest overseas asset had been bringing in an estimated $1.5–2 billion in net profit each year. Its loss is set to cost Russia’s budget tens of billions of rubles in missed income. Remember all that talk from Moscow about a "New World Order"? About how the "Global Majority" was going to stick together and move away from the West? Well, Iraq just hit the "Delete" button on that fantasy. For years, we were told Iraq was a key Russian partner. But the second the U.S. tightened the sanctions "handcuffs," Baghdad threw Russia under the bus to save its own bank account. And who did Iraq invite to take over? ExxonMobil and Chevron. Yes, the American "giants" Russia has been trying to replace for a decade are now walking back in to take the loot. This event isn't just a business deal gone wrong. It’s a collapse of the "alternative world order" that Moscow has been trying to build. Remember a month ago, when putin told the Iraqi President that their relationship has "never had a dark moment"? 🤡 “I fully agree with you: our relations are deep and long-standing. And throughout their entire history, there has never been a dark moment," putin told Rashid during talks in Turkmenistan on December 12, 2025. #Russia #Iraq #OilPolitics #GlobalMajority #Exxon #Chevron

Yasmina

172,021 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Tusk: Russia Will Be Ready for War with NATO in Just 18 Months “Today, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, General Alexis Grinkevich, confirmed to me the American assessments that Russia will be ready for confrontation in just a year and a half,” said Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Grinkevich had previously warned of high risks of escalation with both Russia and China in the near future. On the same day, Putin’s aide Nikolai Patrushev issued this threat: “Any military aggression against the Kaliningrad region will face an immediate and crushing response using all means available to Russia, as outlined in the military doctrine and nuclear deterrence policy.” The irony is hard to miss: on the third year of its “victorious” war, Russia isn’t holding a parade in Kyiv — it’s panicking about defending Kaliningrad. Let’s be clear: this isn’t about defense. Russia has turned the exclave into a permanent pressure point, constantly militarizing it. A staged provocation in Kaliningrad could become Moscow’s excuse for attacking NATO. It’s a ticking time bomb for the alliance. The Kremlin is hinting that its next “special military operation” might be to “protect” the historically Russian Königsberg. The infamous Suwałki Gap — NATO’s most vulnerable corridor — is already being heavily fortified. Russia has also repeatedly threatened the Baltic states, known for their firm stance against Russian imperialism. At times, the Kremlin’s twisted fantasies spiral out of control. Case in point: a recent exhibition styled in outright Nazi aesthetics, where so-called “denazifiers” claimed some “inferior” peoples have no right to statehood. Apparently, their skulls aren’t shaped correctly. What these displays leave out — quite conveniently — is Russia’s own history: from Mongol vassals to Chinese puppets.

NEXTA

38,383 просмотров • 1 год назад

This reparations push is straight hypocrisy dressed up as justice. Look at the countries involved. A couple in Africa, a couple Arab Muslim ones (Mauritania counts as both), and one in South America. Most of them only got rid of slavery after heavy Western pressure, some not even that long ago. Mauritania was basically the last country on the planet to ban it in 1981, and it’s still an enforcement mess there. But you don’t see African or Caribbean nations demanding money from other Africans who captured and sold their own people for centuries. Or from the Arabs, who ran a slave trade that lasted way longer, moved millions across the Sahara and Indian Ocean, and routinely castrated male slaves so they couldn’t reproduce. That one gets a total pass. Instead, the finger points only at the West, the one civilization that actually decided slavery was wrong, abolished it at home, and then spent blood and ships forcing the rest of the world to stop. Britain’s navy patrolled the seas and lost men doing it. America lost over half a million lives in a civil war that ended it. Europe leaned on everyone else to follow. Africans were enslaving Africans long before any European ship showed up. They lost wars, got captured, and got sold. Europeans just bought what was already on the market. The whole supply chain started with Africans selling Africans. The only reason this “pay us” routine targets the West is because that’s where the money is. Everyone else is broke or doesn’t play the guilt game. It’s resentment plus opportunity. Nothing deeper. And this whole narrative likely didn’t start in Africa. It has the fingerprints of Western leftists and NGOs all over it, people who hate the West, cooked up the guilt trip in universities and activist circles, then found willing partners overseas to push it. Follow the money and the talking points. You’ll see where it really came from.

Rothmus 🏴

18,715 просмотров • 1 месяц назад