Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—™๐—œ is almost here! and yes, the name means what it should. Because weโ€™re in this #๐—ง๐—ข๐—š๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ. If we, as ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€, ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€, ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€, donโ€™t put respect on our work, nobody will. Weโ€™re done accepting ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ง๐—š๐—˜๐˜€, ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€, and โ€œweโ€™ll see next quarterโ€. Weโ€™re building...

172,613 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 10 Monaten โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

BREAKING ๐Ÿšจ โ€ผ๏ธ My advice to everybody is to get ready for the WEB3 system. The WEB3 financial system is getting ready to switch. All private central bankers have been notified and put on notice that we have to prepare our people for tokenization processes throughout anything tied to the USD system. So the Federal Reserve and private central bankers are going to be moving over onto the Ripple network โ€” thatโ€™s a given. For those of you following Q and the Q program, the Anon series, you have been right on track the entire time, but we know how thatโ€™s going to work. For those of you not in it and operating on the public side, Iโ€™ll tell you something very clearly right now: if you are not moving into the trust processes and you canโ€™t manage to make that process work for yourself, what I want you to do is at least go get yourself some XRP and hold it there โ€” you can thank me later when everything switches over. If weโ€™re being notified to notify our own clients, that means this is signed, sealed, and delivered. Everything is coming down the pipeline and weโ€™re getting ready to flip the switch. Again, you donโ€™t want to be on the outside looking in, because when they flip that switch, if youโ€™re not in the institutional program, you are not going to be able to access that side of the ledgers. So again, theyโ€™re going to make it almost impossible for anybody to access those coins. Iโ€™m just giving you a quick hint. If you have not yet moved into the WEB3 system, and you cannot manage the process on your own, I can provide direct guidance. Join my private Telegram channel for step-by-step support ๐Ÿ‘‰ Act now. Donโ€™t wait until itโ€™s too late.

Q) THE STORM RIDER

47,984 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: โ€œI really think it can be beat because thereโ€™s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.โ€ โ€œIf youโ€™re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. โ€ฆ Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.โ€ โ€œSo, because youโ€™re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. Itโ€™s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forwardโ€ ______________________________________ โ€œAnother problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who donโ€™t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. โ€ฆ Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not โ€˜Am I making a drug thatโ€™s going to make a difference for people?โ€™ The framework is โ€˜Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?โ€™ And that happens a lot.โ€ โ€œThere are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and itโ€™s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like thatโ€. _______________________________________ โ€œIโ€™m not saying that we have this all solved. But what weโ€™re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we donโ€™t fall in love with anything, or we donโ€™t have to fall in love with anything. โ€ฆ And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we donโ€™t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? Thatโ€™s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?โ€ โ€œWhen you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding โ€˜Weโ€™re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way weโ€™re going to kill it because weโ€™ve got something else behind it.โ€™โ€ โ€œI do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. โ€ฆ And there are examples of thisโ€ฆ companies Iโ€™ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. โ€ฆ So itโ€™sโ€ฆ you can do it better that wayโ€

Jack Prescott

31,665 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat

#JACKSON's ment at #GOT7_NESTFESTinBKK_Day1 ๐Ÿ‘‘ since i canโ€™t speak much thai, i'll speak in korean. first of all, what i want to say is, this has been a dream for all 7 of us. and i want to say thank you for waiting for us. because realistically, as time passes, you never really know what will happen. but the fact that weโ€™re still here, that means everything to us. of course, weโ€™re now in different companies, but what i want to say is, everyone here is struggling in some way. honestly, thereโ€™s not a single person who isnโ€™t. if the seven of us can bring you even just a moment of happiness, thatโ€™s something we always talk about when weโ€™re together. of course, business is business, thatโ€™s reality. but what makes us a bit different isโ€ฆ we donโ€™t really care about that. the 7 of us grew up together, since i was 17. that's what "brothers" means to us. we donโ€™t know how long weโ€™ll be able to have moments like this. but in life, for the rest of our lives, weโ€™ll keep giving it everything weโ€™ve got. thereโ€™s one thing that hasnโ€™t changed and never will. no matter what, even when weโ€™re in our 40s, 50s, 60sโ€ฆ even if we canโ€™t dance anymore, even if dancing breaks our bones, weโ€™ll still do it. even sitting might break our bones at that point. but happinessโ€ฆ everyone has a different standard for it. and thatโ€™s our standard of happiness. thank you.

๐ฃ๐จ๐ฒ๐œ๐ž

63,721 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution weโ€™ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. Itโ€™s really because weโ€™ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then weโ€™re all in. But if youโ€™re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely youโ€™re going to have a revolution. So I think thatโ€™s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If weโ€™re going to have productivity gains, working peopleโ€”the ones who make these industries happenโ€”need to share in that. There hasnโ€™t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributingโ€”yes, that word is a dirty word around hereโ€”we need to talk about it and confront how weโ€™re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, letโ€™s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 7 Monaten

Trump as Americans die in war with Iran: โ€œIf you look behind me, see the nice gold curtains? If you want to look into a nice foundation and you want to see a lot of work, very deep, very, very deep for specific reasons, we have. A magnificent ballroom being built because this is the biggest room and it holds like 98 people for dinner, but behind me youโ€™re gonna have a ballroom thatโ€™s gonna that this building and the people occupying it in particular, every president for 150 years has clamored for a ballroom, a large beautiful room. This is a cocktail room. And this will actually be this whole floor will end up being a cocktail room for the cocktail area or pre-area for the ballroom before dinners, so weโ€™ll have heads of state. We canโ€™t even do a heads of state dinner usually what they do is they would do them on the lawn with a tent. But when it rains, the lawn is very low and you know the land in Washington it was built on swampy wetland and when it rains and you have The King of Saudi Arabia, we have as an example, the King of the UK. I would say King of England, who was a great guy. Heโ€™s coming in very soon and when it rains, you know what happened? The rain would go over their feet. It would be about 4 or 5 inches over their shoes. This was not good, so, and it rained a lot. So weโ€™re building finally because I do that and by the way no taxpayer money. I want to put that 0 itโ€™s gonna be itโ€™s on time on budget itโ€™ll be under budget we literally weโ€™re having it under budget other than weโ€™ve upgraded it in terms of the marbles weโ€™re using. Weโ€™re using onyx and stones that are incredible, but itโ€™ll be itโ€™ll be something really spectacularโ€

Headquarters

70,099 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

NBCโ€™s Gabe Gutierrez: โ€œJust a few moments ago, the Commission of Fine Arts approved your design redesign for your arch. Do you think you need congressional approval for it?โ€ Trump: โ€œOh, thatโ€™s good news. I finally get good news.โ€: Gutierrez: โ€œDo you think you need congressional approval for it?โ€ Trump: โ€œWhat was the vote? Do you know what the vote was? What was the vote?โ€ Gutierrez: โ€œIโ€™ve just seen the headline here a few minutes ago. I donโ€™t have the exact vote, but โ€”โ€ Trump: โ€œSo, weโ€™re building whatโ€™s called the Triumphal Arch, right opposite the Arlington Memorial Bridge, right by Arlington Cemetery. Itโ€™s beautiful. Itโ€™s the โ€” Arc de Triomphe would be the one that you would probably know in Paris. Itโ€™s one of the most beautiful. Itโ€™s a very similar size, slightly larger. Weโ€™re doing โ€” we have to do slightly larger. It doesnโ€™t have to be a lot larger. Otherwise, youโ€™d all be disappointed in me. But itโ€™s even far more beautiful. And I think that the Arc de Triomphe is beautiful. Itโ€™s, you know, a couple of hundred years old, but I think itโ€™s beautiful. And some arcs go back over a thousand years. And itโ€™s called a triumphal arc. Itโ€™s usually done for victories in war and things. There are 59 of them in the world. And some are really beautiful. And weโ€™re the only major โ€” Washington D.C., which should be number one โ€” and weโ€™re the only important and major city that doesnโ€™t have one. We donโ€™t have a triumphal arc. So, it was meant to be built for many years. The circle going up to the bridge, it was โ€” people passed that circle. They say, why isnโ€™t something built here? And so, thatโ€™s very good. We just got approval from Fine Arts. Thatโ€™s fantastic.โ€ Gutierrez: โ€œBut you need Congress to sign off on it.?โ€ Trump: โ€œNo, we donโ€™t. No, no, weโ€™re doing it. Itโ€™s โ€” the land is owned by secretary โ€” by the Interior Department. We donโ€™t need anything from Congress.โ€

Curtis Houck

48,765 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Monaten

Recently asked Coach Roberts about being a โ€œwin nowโ€ team while still developing younger talent, like Sania Feagin and Taโ€™Niya Latson: Essentially, the Sparks are focused on pursuing a championship and not development. โ€œI think every team in the league wants to win now,โ€ said Roberts. โ€œBut we also recognize weโ€™re in LA and weโ€™re one of the original franchises. I didnโ€™t come to LA to rebuild or do some slow thing. I know KP [Kelsey Plum] didnโ€™t, and Nneka [Ogwumike] didnโ€™t. Our front office has that in mind as well in terms of getting players that will help us win now, but are also the right fit for what weโ€™re trying to do and how weโ€™re trying to play. I think weโ€™ve done a good job of that. To your point about balancing with the young guys, a lot of the work in developing young players isnโ€™t seen. Itโ€™s with our player development staff, our coaching staff; they get coached up a lot. Itโ€™s just a hard league to break into, it really is. But we believe in those guys, and weโ€™re going to continue working. Their numbers will get called, and itโ€™s a matter of them staying ready. Theyโ€™ve done a great job at that, but theyโ€™re completely invested. Their work ethic is great, their buy-in is great, so everyoneโ€™s journey is different. Sometimes it takes a little bit to break in and sometimes itโ€™s right away. Thatโ€™s what went into it.โ€

christan (no i), รŸ

42,289 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Monaten

Tim Dillon says that Israel doesnโ€™t want a ceasefire and this โ€œblow up the whole building bc there might be terrorists insideโ€ strategy is insane and ppl are starting to notice. โ€œSo Israel is just blowing up apartment complexes because within that apartment complex there are terrorists. This is what all these advocates of the Israeli strategy keep telling us, that there are terrorists in this apartment complex, so we just gotta light it up. We just gotta blow it up. Absolute bombing in Beirut, purely civilian, innocent children and the elderly. It seems to be embracing their argument, weโ€™re going to kill everyone and then some of those people will be terrorists. Thatโ€™s really their argument. If we kill everyone, inevitably some of the people will be terrorists, because anyone thinking about becoming a terrorist, or anyone who knows a terrorist, or who might grow up to be a terrorist has to be eliminated. Theyโ€™ve taken this strategy, and Iโ€™ve never even seen this in 41 years of my life. Iโ€™ve never seen the brutality of this type of warfare, where you go in and in minutes a lot of civilians are killed, women and children. The backlash that Israel will get from this, and the United States will get from funding it, is going to be insane. Youโ€™re creating terrorists all over the world that are seeing this bloodshed and are going to be radicalized to commit acts of terror. You canโ€™t indiscriminately kill civilians and not expect people to be driven to violence.โ€

Grace Chong, MBI

70,314 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 5 Monaten

But the most urgent question came at the end. Will Cain asked what millions of Americans have been wondering since the collapse in Kabul: When will there be accountability for the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan? Hegseth didnโ€™t flinch. Accountability is coming. โ€œGreat question! Weโ€™re all over it in our office.โ€ Then came the biggest bombshell of the entire conversation. โ€œIn fact, weโ€™ll have an announcement I believe tomorrow. If not later today, tomorrow or Wednesday on the developments of our task force.โ€ According to Hegseth, the investigation is active and already turning up answers. But the damage runs deepโ€”and some of it is still classified. โ€œWeโ€™re moving, weโ€™re finding, weโ€™re investigating. Itโ€™s going to take a little bit of time. Because thereโ€™s a lot of things that need to be uncovered, classified aspects.โ€ Still, he made one thing clear: the clock is ticking on those who got away with it. โ€œWeโ€™ve found the right people to be involved.โ€ And for those still waiting on justice, he delivered this: โ€œSo more to come on that. It may take into 2026โ€”to really uncover everything, but there will be accountability.โ€ โ€œWeโ€™re committed to it. We will not leave a single stone unturned.โ€ The Pentagon has changed. The priorities are shifting. And the people responsible for one of the most humiliating chapters in American military historyโ€”may finally have to answer for it.

The Vigilant Fox ๐ŸฆŠ

144,722 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr