Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dรถn

โš ๏ธ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด! ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ด๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฝ! Shay McCartan โ–ถ๏ธ David Beckham A very over excited commentator describing a very very special goal from Shay McCartan | NI Football League

Portadownfc's profile picture

Portadown FC

15,956 subscribers

39,918 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

SporHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Gary Burr โค๏ธ profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Gary Burr โค๏ธ1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL @Staceywestblog I really rated him.

BertBloggs profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
BertBloggs1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Thats a helluva strike ๐Ÿ‘€

walksandgolfNI profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
walksandgolfNI1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Surprised that clown hit the target

Paul Wilson profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Paul Wilson1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Brilliant goal. Seeing players doing special things in our own league is good. Well done Portadown today also.

Greer Wilson profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Greer Wilson1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL It certainly is a magical goal. It raised the commentators voice by 3 full octaves!!

Mr Bumhole profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Mr Bumhole1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Do a "What a goal" count

Michael Ferguson profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Michael Ferguson1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Don't show the foul on the Larne player before.... oh wait you didn't ๐Ÿคฃ

Richard Jameson profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Richard Jameson1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL @TheOfficialFNG

Kim Pentland profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Kim Pentland1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Our jonny our team Mon the Ports โค๏ธ๐Ÿ‘

Baines Adams profil fotoฤŸrafฤฑ
Baines Adams1 yฤฑl รถnce

@OfficialNIFL Puskas award for shay McCartan. Reminds me of Beckham vs Wimbledon all those years ago

Benzer Videolar

Adedayoooooooooooooooooo๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ Listen to the noise!!! Bedlam in Remo!! A goal for generations yet unborn and Remo stars are 6mins away from becoming champions of the Nigerian premier league for the very first time! Adedayoโ€™s Thunder bolt seals the NPFL title for Remo Stars in Remoโœจ If I donโ€™t do anything else in Nigeria football this moment is enough to give me a special place in the history of the Nigerian premier league football! Thank you Muyimarks7 for painting this in the most colourful way Congratulations Remo Stars Sports Club Champions NPFL2024/25 Like, Rt and share if you love๐Ÿ”ฅ #NPFL25FinalStretch #NPFL25 #NPFL
3:29

Adedayoooooooooooooooooo๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ Listen to the noise!!! Bedlam in Remo!! A goal for generations yet unborn and Remo stars are 6mins away from becoming champions of the Nigerian premier league for the very first time! Adedayoโ€™s Thunder bolt seals the NPFL title for Remo Stars in Remoโœจ If I donโ€™t do anything else in Nigeria football this moment is enough to give me a special place in the history of the Nigerian premier league football! Thank you Muyimarks7 for painting this in the most colourful way Congratulations Remo Stars Sports Club Champions NPFL2024/25 Like, Rt and share if you love๐Ÿ”ฅ #NPFL25FinalStretch #NPFL25 #NPFL

DEVOYCE

20,664 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ†† ๐Ÿ†‚๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ถ๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…ถ We are very pleased to welcome midfielder Fin Haines who joins us from Paulton Roversโœ๏ธ @Luffers85 had this to say on his latest signing๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ โ€œIโ€™ve been watching Fin for quite some time and could not believe he hadnโ€™t been playing, so us and two other The Pitching In Southern Football League sides made a move and fortunately he has agreed to join Cribbs. Fin is big, strong, athletic and someone who can play in multiple positions for us. So we are excited to work with him. He is a good age and we hope he can progress with us over the next few seasonsโ€ #bristolfootball
0:59

๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ†† ๐Ÿ†‚๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ถ๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…ถ We are very pleased to welcome midfielder Fin Haines who joins us from Paulton Roversโœ๏ธ @Luffers85 had this to say on his latest signing๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ โ€œIโ€™ve been watching Fin for quite some time and could not believe he hadnโ€™t been playing, so us and two other The Pitching In Southern Football League sides made a move and fortunately he has agreed to join Cribbs. Fin is big, strong, athletic and someone who can play in multiple positions for us. So we are excited to work with him. He is a good age and we hope he can progress with us over the next few seasonsโ€ #bristolfootball

Cribbs Football Club

30,729 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Jack Aitchison - Available in the Summer Jacks Main Attributes: > Goal-Threat on Both Feet > Underlapping Runs & Driven Crosses > Cute Through-Balls on Last-Line > High-Pressing Wins This Season at Exeter: > 31 Starts > 9 Goal Involvements > 27 Chances Created > 4th Most Fouled Player in League One His video & data reports marry up quite well with Clubs that would try dominate the ball and build chances over being "Direct" and relying on "2nd Balls": > Clubs Playing a 4-2-3-1 with a "Single-10", a 4-3-3 with "Two-8s" or a 3-4-3 with a "Two-10s" > League One (Sheffield Wednesday dropping, Luton/Bolton if they don't go up & Notts County/Salford/MK Dons if they go up) Outside of that, watching as much Scottish Football as I do, I reckon Hibs & Aberdeen would really benefit from a "Number 10" with Jack Aitchisons Skillset A very talented attacking player that probably needs to find the "Right-Home" for this next move
6:07

Jack Aitchison - Available in the Summer Jacks Main Attributes: > Goal-Threat on Both Feet > Underlapping Runs & Driven Crosses > Cute Through-Balls on Last-Line > High-Pressing Wins This Season at Exeter: > 31 Starts > 9 Goal Involvements > 27 Chances Created > 4th Most Fouled Player in League One His video & data reports marry up quite well with Clubs that would try dominate the ball and build chances over being "Direct" and relying on "2nd Balls": > Clubs Playing a 4-2-3-1 with a "Single-10", a 4-3-3 with "Two-8s" or a 3-4-3 with a "Two-10s" > League One (Sheffield Wednesday dropping, Luton/Bolton if they don't go up & Notts County/Salford/MK Dons if they go up) Outside of that, watching as much Scottish Football as I do, I reckon Hibs & Aberdeen would really benefit from a "Number 10" with Jack Aitchisons Skillset A very talented attacking player that probably needs to find the "Right-Home" for this next move

John Walker

107,866 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce

Jack Hawkins on his experience making Basil Dearden's "The League of Gentlemen" (1960)- The first movie of Allied Film makers: "No actor could have been other than excited by this brilliantly written story of an ex-army officer who collects a group of his former war-time comrades to plan and carry out a daring bank robbery. (...) It was a tremendously entertaining film to make, in spite of the fact that my throat began to cause me some trouble because we had a long sequence in a smoke-screen, and this took two days to shoot. But my hoarseness was nothingโ€”or so it seemed thenโ€” compared with the excitement of having real control over the whole film. For once, one was responsible for a complete film, and not just playing a part to the best of oneโ€™s ability. And, of course, the satisfaction of creating a complete thing was spiced with the gamble involved, because trying to make a fortune out of a film is not so very far removed from trying to win a football pool. The chances of success are about the same. But, as things turned out, the film was a tremendous box-office success." ('Anything for a Quiet Life', Jack Hawkins, 1973) P.S: On this day, 66 years ago, 'The League of Gentlemen' (1960) premiered in London, U.K.
1:30

Jack Hawkins on his experience making Basil Dearden's "The League of Gentlemen" (1960)- The first movie of Allied Film makers: "No actor could have been other than excited by this brilliantly written story of an ex-army officer who collects a group of his former war-time comrades to plan and carry out a daring bank robbery. (...) It was a tremendously entertaining film to make, in spite of the fact that my throat began to cause me some trouble because we had a long sequence in a smoke-screen, and this took two days to shoot. But my hoarseness was nothingโ€”or so it seemed thenโ€” compared with the excitement of having real control over the whole film. For once, one was responsible for a complete film, and not just playing a part to the best of oneโ€™s ability. And, of course, the satisfaction of creating a complete thing was spiced with the gamble involved, because trying to make a fortune out of a film is not so very far removed from trying to win a football pool. The chances of success are about the same. But, as things turned out, the film was a tremendous box-office success." ('Anything for a Quiet Life', Jack Hawkins, 1973) P.S: On this day, 66 years ago, 'The League of Gentlemen' (1960) premiered in London, U.K.

DepressedBergman

31,287 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce

Peterhead Football Club today surprised Chairman Rodger Morrison, renaming the Main Stand in his honour. Rodger has given forty years service to PFC with twenty of those spent as Chairman, a huge amount of selfless hard work, dedication and financial contribution. As he also helped fund one of the stands here at Balmoor, it was only fitting that the main stand bear the name of "Mr Peterhead" ๐Ÿ”ตโšช๐Ÿ’™ From those within the club who know him well: "I hold Rodger in very high regard, all those years heading up the club can't have been easy, lesser men would have taken the easy route and moved on. This is a very worthy tribute naming the stand after him" - Les Hill, PFC Vice-Chairman โ€œRodger has been involved for many decades with the club at Peterhead FC. He was heavily involved when we played at Recreation Park, and was instrumental in the discussions and move to Balmoor Stadium. His knowledge of local businesses, and those further afield, has ensured that the name of Peterhead FC is well publicised. Rodger does a power of work for the club, much of it unseen, and the naming of the main stand at Balmoor Stadium is a fitting tribute, and recognition of the amount of work he has put into Peterhead Football Club over many years.โ€ - Charles Watt, PFC Financial Director "Leadership of a football club comes with many challenges, especially in a close-knit community. Rodger Morrison is a shining example of the strength of character and resilience required and to provide that service to Peterhead Football Club for over 30 years is outstanding. He is always open to speak to supporters and knows the majority on first name terms, that open approach helped the club survive dire times during Covid, now with the community foundation the club is doing more than ever to support the community. It is then very fitting that that dedication and service is recognised by renaming the main stand in his honour" - Gavin Mundie, PFC Community Foundation Chairman "The recognition of Rodger's total commitment to PFC and the unrivalled service he has given the club could not be more derserved. I want to wish the Morrison family a truly memorable day. I am in Italy therefore cannot be there but my head and heart will be at Balmoor this afternoon" - Brian McCombie, PFC Community Foundation Trustee "Rodger has been a great ambassador and Chairman for Peterhead FC since he took over the pie hut at the Rec in 1983. I always regarded the late, great Robbie Warrender as Mr PFC but having worked closely with Rodger over the past 15 years he has taken over that title. Believe me given the 50 years I have been associated with the Club that is great praise! Rodger was the catalyst to build and move to Balmoor and then to gain entry to the Scottish league. A true supporter of this great Club and well worthy of this special tribute" - Nat Porter, Head of Youth & Community "This is a well deserved legacy for a man who lives and breathes Peterhead Football Club" - Jim McInally
1:13

Peterhead Football Club today surprised Chairman Rodger Morrison, renaming the Main Stand in his honour. Rodger has given forty years service to PFC with twenty of those spent as Chairman, a huge amount of selfless hard work, dedication and financial contribution. As he also helped fund one of the stands here at Balmoor, it was only fitting that the main stand bear the name of "Mr Peterhead" ๐Ÿ”ตโšช๐Ÿ’™ From those within the club who know him well: "I hold Rodger in very high regard, all those years heading up the club can't have been easy, lesser men would have taken the easy route and moved on. This is a very worthy tribute naming the stand after him" - Les Hill, PFC Vice-Chairman โ€œRodger has been involved for many decades with the club at Peterhead FC. He was heavily involved when we played at Recreation Park, and was instrumental in the discussions and move to Balmoor Stadium. His knowledge of local businesses, and those further afield, has ensured that the name of Peterhead FC is well publicised. Rodger does a power of work for the club, much of it unseen, and the naming of the main stand at Balmoor Stadium is a fitting tribute, and recognition of the amount of work he has put into Peterhead Football Club over many years.โ€ - Charles Watt, PFC Financial Director "Leadership of a football club comes with many challenges, especially in a close-knit community. Rodger Morrison is a shining example of the strength of character and resilience required and to provide that service to Peterhead Football Club for over 30 years is outstanding. He is always open to speak to supporters and knows the majority on first name terms, that open approach helped the club survive dire times during Covid, now with the community foundation the club is doing more than ever to support the community. It is then very fitting that that dedication and service is recognised by renaming the main stand in his honour" - Gavin Mundie, PFC Community Foundation Chairman "The recognition of Rodger's total commitment to PFC and the unrivalled service he has given the club could not be more derserved. I want to wish the Morrison family a truly memorable day. I am in Italy therefore cannot be there but my head and heart will be at Balmoor this afternoon" - Brian McCombie, PFC Community Foundation Trustee "Rodger has been a great ambassador and Chairman for Peterhead FC since he took over the pie hut at the Rec in 1983. I always regarded the late, great Robbie Warrender as Mr PFC but having worked closely with Rodger over the past 15 years he has taken over that title. Believe me given the 50 years I have been associated with the Club that is great praise! Rodger was the catalyst to build and move to Balmoor and then to gain entry to the Scottish league. A true supporter of this great Club and well worthy of this special tribute" - Nat Porter, Head of Youth & Community "This is a well deserved legacy for a man who lives and breathes Peterhead Football Club" - Jim McInally

Peterhead FC

25,035 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Xabi Alonsoโ€™s Full Post-Brighton Press Conference ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Nine goals scored this week, five conceded and three wins. Did you enjoy today? ๐Ÿ˜… Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œIn the end, I enjoyed all the wins a lot. But again, there were different moments and different feelings. Ultimately, weโ€™re happy with the result. โ€œWe value this win a lot against a very good opponent โ€” one that has been tough for us in recent years. โ€œThere were moments when we did really well and other moments that showed this is still a process. Weโ€™re continuing to learn about ourselves and improve. Normally, itโ€™s easier to do that after a win.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: What can you tell us about Moisรฉs Caicedo? Was it the same problem or something new? ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿš‘ Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œHopefully itโ€™s nothing serious. It wasnโ€™t something new and it wasnโ€™t worse than last time. He was cautious enough to stop and say that the feeling wasnโ€™t the best. โ€œWe need to assess him during the week.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Pedro Neto tapped the Chelsea badge after scoring. Can you guarantee heโ€™ll still be here after the transfer deadline? ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ‘€ Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œYou know, in football, I donโ€™t guarantee anything about anyone. โ€œBut I was very happy with Pedro. He did really well and played with a lot of energy. Heโ€™s going to be very important for the team throughout the season because he has different, special qualities. โ€œHeโ€™s a threat one-v-one, attacks space very well and is strong and competitive. Iโ€™m happy he scored. He was very close to scoring another one. Iโ€™m very happy with Pedro.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Chelsea had only 25% possession today after 38% against Fulham. Is this the type of transitional Chelsea you want? ๐Ÿ“Š Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œNo. For me, every piece of data needs context. โ€œAfter 30 minutes, we were 3โ€“0 up. Probably from that moment, we played too much with the result instead of continuing to play. โ€œThe data isnโ€™t whatโ€™s important. What matters is how you play and what you can do better. My approach isnโ€™t to say, โ€˜Today we need 60% possession or 20%.โ€™ โ€œI never talk about those things. Itโ€™s about how we prepare and how we become more competitive. โ€œThere were different moments in the game. There were periods when we did really, really well and other moments when we could have done better.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: When you say Chelsea started โ€˜playing the resultโ€™ at 3โ€“0, was that complacency? ๐Ÿง  Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œNo. I would say itโ€™s quite normal. It happens with many teams. โ€œTeams that have worked together and played more games together usually have a better understanding of how to manage those moments. We are still in that process. โ€œIโ€™m sure that in the future weโ€™ll manage those situations better. Even at 3โ€“1 at half-time, I told the players: โ€˜Guys, a two-goal lead in the Premier League โ€” we still need to focus on playing, scoring goals and defending well.โ€™ โ€œAfterwards, we could have scored a fifth. Many things happened during the game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Emiliano Martรญnez went straight into the starting XI. Did you have any concerns throwing him straight in? ๐Ÿงค๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œWith Emi, heโ€™s 34 years old and has experience from all around. โ€œI spoke with him yesterday. We talked about the game and about our team, and he felt ready. I donโ€™t have to tell him many things for him to perform. โ€œOf course, a goalkeeper always wants a clean sheet, but Iโ€™m happy with his first impact. He had only been in the building for 48 hours. โ€œNow weโ€™ll have the whole week to prepare for the next game. Day by day, weโ€™ll feel his presence because he has that charisma and aura to influence and establish a very positive connection with the rest of the team.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: And what happens with Robert Sรกnchez now that he wasnโ€™t in the squad? ๐Ÿ”„ Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: The supplied transcript does not contain a separate answer addressing Sรกnchezโ€™s future. (1/2) ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿพ
6:07

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Xabi Alonsoโ€™s Full Post-Brighton Press Conference ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Nine goals scored this week, five conceded and three wins. Did you enjoy today? ๐Ÿ˜… Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œIn the end, I enjoyed all the wins a lot. But again, there were different moments and different feelings. Ultimately, weโ€™re happy with the result. โ€œWe value this win a lot against a very good opponent โ€” one that has been tough for us in recent years. โ€œThere were moments when we did really well and other moments that showed this is still a process. Weโ€™re continuing to learn about ourselves and improve. Normally, itโ€™s easier to do that after a win.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: What can you tell us about Moisรฉs Caicedo? Was it the same problem or something new? ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿš‘ Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œHopefully itโ€™s nothing serious. It wasnโ€™t something new and it wasnโ€™t worse than last time. He was cautious enough to stop and say that the feeling wasnโ€™t the best. โ€œWe need to assess him during the week.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Pedro Neto tapped the Chelsea badge after scoring. Can you guarantee heโ€™ll still be here after the transfer deadline? ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ‘€ Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œYou know, in football, I donโ€™t guarantee anything about anyone. โ€œBut I was very happy with Pedro. He did really well and played with a lot of energy. Heโ€™s going to be very important for the team throughout the season because he has different, special qualities. โ€œHeโ€™s a threat one-v-one, attacks space very well and is strong and competitive. Iโ€™m happy he scored. He was very close to scoring another one. Iโ€™m very happy with Pedro.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Chelsea had only 25% possession today after 38% against Fulham. Is this the type of transitional Chelsea you want? ๐Ÿ“Š Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œNo. For me, every piece of data needs context. โ€œAfter 30 minutes, we were 3โ€“0 up. Probably from that moment, we played too much with the result instead of continuing to play. โ€œThe data isnโ€™t whatโ€™s important. What matters is how you play and what you can do better. My approach isnโ€™t to say, โ€˜Today we need 60% possession or 20%.โ€™ โ€œI never talk about those things. Itโ€™s about how we prepare and how we become more competitive. โ€œThere were different moments in the game. There were periods when we did really, really well and other moments when we could have done better.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: When you say Chelsea started โ€˜playing the resultโ€™ at 3โ€“0, was that complacency? ๐Ÿง  Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œNo. I would say itโ€™s quite normal. It happens with many teams. โ€œTeams that have worked together and played more games together usually have a better understanding of how to manage those moments. We are still in that process. โ€œIโ€™m sure that in the future weโ€™ll manage those situations better. Even at 3โ€“1 at half-time, I told the players: โ€˜Guys, a two-goal lead in the Premier League โ€” we still need to focus on playing, scoring goals and defending well.โ€™ โ€œAfterwards, we could have scored a fifth. Many things happened during the game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: Emiliano Martรญnez went straight into the starting XI. Did you have any concerns throwing him straight in? ๐Ÿงค๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: โ€œWith Emi, heโ€™s 34 years old and has experience from all around. โ€œI spoke with him yesterday. We talked about the game and about our team, and he felt ready. I donโ€™t have to tell him many things for him to perform. โ€œOf course, a goalkeeper always wants a clean sheet, but Iโ€™m happy with his first impact. He had only been in the building for 48 hours. โ€œNow weโ€™ll have the whole week to prepare for the next game. Day by day, weโ€™ll feel his presence because he has that charisma and aura to influence and establish a very positive connection with the rest of the team.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Reporter: And what happens with Robert Sรกnchez now that he wasnโ€™t in the squad? ๐Ÿ”„ Alonso ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ: The supplied transcript does not contain a separate answer addressing Sรกnchezโ€™s future. (1/2) ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿพ

Miki Djan

239,096 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 19 gรผn รถnce

Excited to share that Iโ€™m currently on a fully sponsored study trip to Canada, courtesy of the Lagos State Government, at Queenโ€™s University! ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Itโ€™s been over a week since I arrived, and between jet lag, time zone shifts, the long flight from Lagos, and a packed academic schedule, Iโ€™m still adjusting ๐Ÿ˜…โ€ฆNigeria is 5 hours ahead, and itโ€™s been fascinating to experience the difference, it doesnโ€™t get dark here until around 9 or 10pm, and by 5am everywhere is already bright. The nights are very short, and the days are really long.. Grateful to the Lagos State Government for this opportunity i honestly canโ€™t thank them enough.. Special thanks to the Honourable Commissioner for Youth and Social Development, Mobolaji Ogunlende and my dear mummy Pharm. (Mrs) Oluwatoyin Oke-Osayintolu, Permanent Secretary of the Ministryโ€ฆAnd of course thank you to Mr Babajide Sanwo- Olu (Lagos State Governor) Babajide Sanwo-Olu for making it possible for me to fly across continents and be part of this life-changing experience. Also thrilled to announce that Lagos Junction has secured a media partnership with Future Perspectives for this programme! The team is incredibly grateful for the opportunity, and weโ€™ve already started capturing exclusive content from the trip โ€” with more to come!!! Huge thanks to the Future Perspectives team Future Perspectives for putting this amazing programme together, and a special shout-out to Mrs Abimbola Asekun, Co-Founder and Executive Directorโ€ฆ. Future Perspectives ..Itโ€™s been an amazing experience learning from her so insightful..and also fun to work with Grateful for this moment, and looking forward to everything thatโ€™s still ahead. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ - Olaniyan David Adeyanju Follow us to stay connected Lagos Junction #lagosjunction #explore #foryou #queensuniversity #canada #canada
3:23

Excited to share that Iโ€™m currently on a fully sponsored study trip to Canada, courtesy of the Lagos State Government, at Queenโ€™s University! ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Itโ€™s been over a week since I arrived, and between jet lag, time zone shifts, the long flight from Lagos, and a packed academic schedule, Iโ€™m still adjusting ๐Ÿ˜…โ€ฆNigeria is 5 hours ahead, and itโ€™s been fascinating to experience the difference, it doesnโ€™t get dark here until around 9 or 10pm, and by 5am everywhere is already bright. The nights are very short, and the days are really long.. Grateful to the Lagos State Government for this opportunity i honestly canโ€™t thank them enough.. Special thanks to the Honourable Commissioner for Youth and Social Development, Mobolaji Ogunlende and my dear mummy Pharm. (Mrs) Oluwatoyin Oke-Osayintolu, Permanent Secretary of the Ministryโ€ฆAnd of course thank you to Mr Babajide Sanwo- Olu (Lagos State Governor) Babajide Sanwo-Olu for making it possible for me to fly across continents and be part of this life-changing experience. Also thrilled to announce that Lagos Junction has secured a media partnership with Future Perspectives for this programme! The team is incredibly grateful for the opportunity, and weโ€™ve already started capturing exclusive content from the trip โ€” with more to come!!! Huge thanks to the Future Perspectives team Future Perspectives for putting this amazing programme together, and a special shout-out to Mrs Abimbola Asekun, Co-Founder and Executive Directorโ€ฆ. Future Perspectives ..Itโ€™s been an amazing experience learning from her so insightful..and also fun to work with Grateful for this moment, and looking forward to everything thatโ€™s still ahead. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ - Olaniyan David Adeyanju Follow us to stay connected Lagos Junction #lagosjunction #explore #foryou #queensuniversity #canada #canada

Lagos Junction

12,720 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿšจ๐ŸŽ™๏ธGary Neville: Cristiano Ronaldo is the most complete player in the world Lionel Messi is great but he is above him ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธLook, thereโ€™s no doubt that Messiโ€™s scored an obscene amount of goals. Heโ€™s a ridiculous player. But Ronaldo, the three big differences are the headers that Ronaldo has scored four or five times more the wrong-footed goals, that Ronaldo has scored 30 or 40 per cent more, and he has scored more penalties. It just took me to the point where he is more complete in terms of the most important part of the game. The thing that tips it over the edge even more is that international record, of the most international goals ever. The fact that heโ€™s won five Champions Leagues with teams that arenโ€™t even as good as Messiโ€™s team. Messiโ€™s won more league titles with that Barcelona team, but I just feel that the international goal record and the Champions Leagues, aligned with the variety of goals that he scores, even though theyโ€™re very similar [in overall numbers], takes me to think that he is the greatest player of all time. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธI looked at his goal breakdown. He can score with his left foot, his wrong foot. He can score with his right foot. He can score from distance. He is probably the best poacher now in world football. He can score penalties. And if you stick him in the box and hang it up there he will go and score with a header. He might even score with a free-kick. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธSo if you think about who is the greatest player of all time, I do think he is the greatest football player who has ever lived. He is the player who could win me a football match in the most different ways. He is the most complete player.
0:55

๐Ÿšจ๐ŸŽ™๏ธGary Neville: Cristiano Ronaldo is the most complete player in the world Lionel Messi is great but he is above him ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธLook, thereโ€™s no doubt that Messiโ€™s scored an obscene amount of goals. Heโ€™s a ridiculous player. But Ronaldo, the three big differences are the headers that Ronaldo has scored four or five times more the wrong-footed goals, that Ronaldo has scored 30 or 40 per cent more, and he has scored more penalties. It just took me to the point where he is more complete in terms of the most important part of the game. The thing that tips it over the edge even more is that international record, of the most international goals ever. The fact that heโ€™s won five Champions Leagues with teams that arenโ€™t even as good as Messiโ€™s team. Messiโ€™s won more league titles with that Barcelona team, but I just feel that the international goal record and the Champions Leagues, aligned with the variety of goals that he scores, even though theyโ€™re very similar [in overall numbers], takes me to think that he is the greatest player of all time. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธI looked at his goal breakdown. He can score with his left foot, his wrong foot. He can score with his right foot. He can score from distance. He is probably the best poacher now in world football. He can score penalties. And if you stick him in the box and hang it up there he will go and score with a header. He might even score with a free-kick. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธSo if you think about who is the greatest player of all time, I do think he is the greatest football player who has ever lived. He is the player who could win me a football match in the most different ways. He is the most complete player.

Hk๐Ÿ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต

60,458 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

The Pain Cave. Ultras are known for the โ€œPain Cave,โ€ this mythical place where athletes suffer for hours on end. What I learned after my bike accident in April is that the Pain Cave doesnโ€™t mean โ€œpainโ€ like a head injury or broken bones. It means stripping down the physical artifice of normal life and exposing your muscles and sinew to the world. Itโ€™s totally vulnerable, and I (the anxiety-riddled former football player who very few people believed was setting a reasonable goal) wanted to see what would happen when I was stripped down to that vulnerable place. Leadville was my first 100 miler, and I didnโ€™t care when and how I got to experience the Pain Cave. I just wanted to experience it of my own volition, not because of a damn car making a left turn without seeing me. And I learned that I could go into that cave, turn on a light, and find thousands of people giving me love and telling me how I inspired them no matter how the race turned out. I hope I can inspire other people to do things that mortify them and seem impossible. Because when you venture into the cave and make yourself that vulnerable, I bet that there might be something special waiting for you when you turn on a light ๐Ÿงก This video is from the 20% grade on Powerline climb at mile 80. I didnโ€™t want to walk a step of the race, and I was having doubts. I was in the cave. And the believers were with me in this moment, carrying me to a record I didnโ€™t know I could achieve. Thank you to all my cave friends ๐Ÿ™ Also, on the drive home to our AirBnB after the race, I thought I was dying. It was my first 100, and it felt so strange. I made Megan pull over. Sheโ€™s a doctor, and she assured me I wasnโ€™t dying. But I wasnโ€™t sure. So I sat there, about to pass out, when suddenly: FARRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTT. I let out a 20-second fart from the pits of hell. โ€œIt was just a fart panic,โ€ Megan said. Ultras are the best.
0:20

The Pain Cave. Ultras are known for the โ€œPain Cave,โ€ this mythical place where athletes suffer for hours on end. What I learned after my bike accident in April is that the Pain Cave doesnโ€™t mean โ€œpainโ€ like a head injury or broken bones. It means stripping down the physical artifice of normal life and exposing your muscles and sinew to the world. Itโ€™s totally vulnerable, and I (the anxiety-riddled former football player who very few people believed was setting a reasonable goal) wanted to see what would happen when I was stripped down to that vulnerable place. Leadville was my first 100 miler, and I didnโ€™t care when and how I got to experience the Pain Cave. I just wanted to experience it of my own volition, not because of a damn car making a left turn without seeing me. And I learned that I could go into that cave, turn on a light, and find thousands of people giving me love and telling me how I inspired them no matter how the race turned out. I hope I can inspire other people to do things that mortify them and seem impossible. Because when you venture into the cave and make yourself that vulnerable, I bet that there might be something special waiting for you when you turn on a light ๐Ÿงก This video is from the 20% grade on Powerline climb at mile 80. I didnโ€™t want to walk a step of the race, and I was having doubts. I was in the cave. And the believers were with me in this moment, carrying me to a record I didnโ€™t know I could achieve. Thank you to all my cave friends ๐Ÿ™ Also, on the drive home to our AirBnB after the race, I thought I was dying. It was my first 100, and it felt so strange. I made Megan pull over. Sheโ€™s a doctor, and she assured me I wasnโ€™t dying. But I wasnโ€™t sure. So I sat there, about to pass out, when suddenly: FARRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTT. I let out a 20-second fart from the pits of hell. โ€œIt was just a fart panic,โ€ Megan said. Ultras are the best.

David Roche

41,692 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

โ€ โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Xabi Alonsoโ€™s First Chelsea Interview โ€“ Part 1/2 ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi Alonso on settling in at Chelsea ๐Ÿ”ต โ€œSettled in. Good vibes and I am looking forward to it.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on becoming Chelsea manager ๐Ÿ’™ โ€œIt feels great. Itโ€™s a big honour to be part of this great club โ€” one of the best in the world, with great success over the last decades. Itโ€™s a big privilege and now Iโ€™m looking forward to the challenge.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on the culture he wants at Chelsea ๐Ÿ’ช โ€œYou canโ€™t hold anything back. Everything is for the team. Hard work is a must. We need to create that culture and it starts here, in the daily process at Cobham.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on Chelseaโ€™s squad potential โšก โ€œThe potential of the team and squad made me really excited. To find a squad to work with, create a football idea, bring excitement to the stadium and connect with the fans.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabiโ€™s message to Chelsea supporters ๐Ÿค โ€œWe want to share the belief that good things will come if we are together and create this strength and power that the club has. The energy has to come from us, but together we can achieve great things.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on building success ๐Ÿง  โ€œSuccess is a consequence of good work, quality decisions and the good culture we want to build. Thatโ€™s the beauty of such a complex but exciting process with so many people involved.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on getting the best from everyone ๐ŸŽฏ โ€œItโ€™s always about getting the best out of everyone. Everyone must be committed to the final goal โ€” being the best we can and giving our best. If we share that feeling every day, we can be optimistic about the future.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on Stamford Bridge ๐ŸŸ๏ธ โ€œI know the energy this stadium has. We need to create that energy and build that bond between all parts of the club.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on what convinced him to join Chelsea ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œThe way this team has played and competed at the highest level not so long ago gave me assurance that the potential is there โ€” because of the quality of the players and the football they have played. Now the work is to carry on many of those things and reach a very competitive level.โ€ #CFC | #Chelsea | #Interviews ๐Ÿ“ฒ CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram
0:20

โ€ โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Xabi Alonsoโ€™s First Chelsea Interview โ€“ Part 1/2 ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi Alonso on settling in at Chelsea ๐Ÿ”ต โ€œSettled in. Good vibes and I am looking forward to it.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on becoming Chelsea manager ๐Ÿ’™ โ€œIt feels great. Itโ€™s a big honour to be part of this great club โ€” one of the best in the world, with great success over the last decades. Itโ€™s a big privilege and now Iโ€™m looking forward to the challenge.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on the culture he wants at Chelsea ๐Ÿ’ช โ€œYou canโ€™t hold anything back. Everything is for the team. Hard work is a must. We need to create that culture and it starts here, in the daily process at Cobham.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on Chelseaโ€™s squad potential โšก โ€œThe potential of the team and squad made me really excited. To find a squad to work with, create a football idea, bring excitement to the stadium and connect with the fans.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabiโ€™s message to Chelsea supporters ๐Ÿค โ€œWe want to share the belief that good things will come if we are together and create this strength and power that the club has. The energy has to come from us, but together we can achieve great things.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on building success ๐Ÿง  โ€œSuccess is a consequence of good work, quality decisions and the good culture we want to build. Thatโ€™s the beauty of such a complex but exciting process with so many people involved.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on getting the best from everyone ๐ŸŽฏ โ€œItโ€™s always about getting the best out of everyone. Everyone must be committed to the final goal โ€” being the best we can and giving our best. If we share that feeling every day, we can be optimistic about the future.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on Stamford Bridge ๐ŸŸ๏ธ โ€œI know the energy this stadium has. We need to create that energy and build that bond between all parts of the club.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Xabi on what convinced him to join Chelsea ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œThe way this team has played and competed at the highest level not so long ago gave me assurance that the potential is there โ€” because of the quality of the players and the football they have played. Now the work is to carry on many of those things and reach a very competitive level.โ€ #CFC | #Chelsea | #Interviews ๐Ÿ“ฒ CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram

Miki Djan

28,971 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

In the middle of baseball season, here are some Major League Major Facts: -Dennis Haysbert actually hit multiple home runs on camera while filming. In the final game when he hit his final home run, he was so excited he forgot to drop the bat and ran the bases with it despite that not being in the script. -For many of the wide crowd scenes of the climactic playoff game, there were over 20,000 extras in the stands. When the team first ran onto the field with the crowd roaring, Haysbert admitted to being emotionally overwhelmed by the experience. Former Major Leaguer and technical advisor Steve Yeager noticed Haysbert's reaction and said to him, "That's what it's like 162 times a year." -In the scene where Jake invades Lynn's party, one of the guests asks how much Jake makes in the Majors. He replies, "I make the league minimum." At the time (1989) the MLB salary minimum was $68,000. Average household income in 1990 was roughly $30,000. -The opponent slugger known as Yankees' home run threat Haywood was played by former pitcher of the Milwaukee Brewers, Peter Vuckovich. Vuckovich never hit a single home run in his entire 11-year major league career. In fact, during 8 of those 11 years he never made a single plate appearance since he was pitching in the American League, which uses a designated hitter to bat for the pitcher. -At the start of the "pennant race" montage, Willie Hayes is shown with 16 pairs of gloves nailed on his bedroom wall, indicating that he had stolen 16 bases in the first 101 games. At the end of the montage, he has at least 78 pairs on the wall, having stolen 62 additional bases in fewer than 60 games. -Haywood's line of "How's your wife and my kids?" was completely improvised by Pete Vuckovich. Ward couldn't think of a good insult that Haywood could say to Taylor, and Vuckovich, assured Ward that he could come up with something on the spot, which was what was caught on camera. -Chelcie Ross (Eddie Harris) played baseball in high school. He was a three-sport star, also playing football and basketball. -Wesley Snipes was not very skilled at baseball in real life, never having played much before. Ward said Snipes was so awful there were no scenes of hom throwing. -The vehicle that Willie Mays Hayes drives to opening day of spring training is a customized VW Beetle with a Rolls Royce grill, replacement trunk and hood ornament. The "Elegant Beetle" kit, as one was called, was popular in the mid-70s to the mid-80s until Rolls Royce sued a company responsible for one of the conversion kits. -Charlie Sheen admitted to Sports Illustrated that he took steroids to prepare for his role. He believed the steroids he took caused him to increase his fastball to 85 MPH. -Former Major-League catcher Steve Yeager served as a coach for the actors in training for the movie, also serving as a stunt double for Tom Berenger in many scenes when Jake Taylor would make a throw from home plate or be in a home plate collision, as well as play third-base coach Temple. -While not particularly specified, many of the players in the movie seem to be based on, or inspired by, former Major League stars. Pedro Cerrano, according to author/director David S. Ward, is based on Orlando Cepeda and Wade Boggs, who would superstitiously eat chicken before every game. Willie Mays Hays is based on Rickey Henderson. Ryne Duren was the inspiration for the character Ricky "Wild Thing" Vaughn, according to Ward. Eddie Harris appears to be inspired by Gaylord Perry, who was well known for using outside substances to enhance his pitches. Jake Taylor may be inspired by Carlton Fisk, a catcher who had a long career with the Boston Red Sox and Chicago White Sox. Lou Brown mentions early on that Taylor was an All-Star in Boston.
2:39

In the middle of baseball season, here are some Major League Major Facts: -Dennis Haysbert actually hit multiple home runs on camera while filming. In the final game when he hit his final home run, he was so excited he forgot to drop the bat and ran the bases with it despite that not being in the script. -For many of the wide crowd scenes of the climactic playoff game, there were over 20,000 extras in the stands. When the team first ran onto the field with the crowd roaring, Haysbert admitted to being emotionally overwhelmed by the experience. Former Major Leaguer and technical advisor Steve Yeager noticed Haysbert's reaction and said to him, "That's what it's like 162 times a year." -In the scene where Jake invades Lynn's party, one of the guests asks how much Jake makes in the Majors. He replies, "I make the league minimum." At the time (1989) the MLB salary minimum was $68,000. Average household income in 1990 was roughly $30,000. -The opponent slugger known as Yankees' home run threat Haywood was played by former pitcher of the Milwaukee Brewers, Peter Vuckovich. Vuckovich never hit a single home run in his entire 11-year major league career. In fact, during 8 of those 11 years he never made a single plate appearance since he was pitching in the American League, which uses a designated hitter to bat for the pitcher. -At the start of the "pennant race" montage, Willie Hayes is shown with 16 pairs of gloves nailed on his bedroom wall, indicating that he had stolen 16 bases in the first 101 games. At the end of the montage, he has at least 78 pairs on the wall, having stolen 62 additional bases in fewer than 60 games. -Haywood's line of "How's your wife and my kids?" was completely improvised by Pete Vuckovich. Ward couldn't think of a good insult that Haywood could say to Taylor, and Vuckovich, assured Ward that he could come up with something on the spot, which was what was caught on camera. -Chelcie Ross (Eddie Harris) played baseball in high school. He was a three-sport star, also playing football and basketball. -Wesley Snipes was not very skilled at baseball in real life, never having played much before. Ward said Snipes was so awful there were no scenes of hom throwing. -The vehicle that Willie Mays Hayes drives to opening day of spring training is a customized VW Beetle with a Rolls Royce grill, replacement trunk and hood ornament. The "Elegant Beetle" kit, as one was called, was popular in the mid-70s to the mid-80s until Rolls Royce sued a company responsible for one of the conversion kits. -Charlie Sheen admitted to Sports Illustrated that he took steroids to prepare for his role. He believed the steroids he took caused him to increase his fastball to 85 MPH. -Former Major-League catcher Steve Yeager served as a coach for the actors in training for the movie, also serving as a stunt double for Tom Berenger in many scenes when Jake Taylor would make a throw from home plate or be in a home plate collision, as well as play third-base coach Temple. -While not particularly specified, many of the players in the movie seem to be based on, or inspired by, former Major League stars. Pedro Cerrano, according to author/director David S. Ward, is based on Orlando Cepeda and Wade Boggs, who would superstitiously eat chicken before every game. Willie Mays Hays is based on Rickey Henderson. Ryne Duren was the inspiration for the character Ricky "Wild Thing" Vaughn, according to Ward. Eddie Harris appears to be inspired by Gaylord Perry, who was well known for using outside substances to enhance his pitches. Jake Taylor may be inspired by Carlton Fisk, a catcher who had a long career with the Boston Red Sox and Chicago White Sox. Lou Brown mentions early on that Taylor was an All-Star in Boston.

The Movie Professor ๐ŸŽฌ๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ“บ

111,179 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

[MBC News America] Special segment covering Taehyungโ€™s first pitch at Dodgers! ๐Ÿ‘ค The Dodger Stadium, usually filled with waves of blue, was dyed purple today. Korean flags and cheering banners in Korean stood out all around. These are fans waiting for BTS V to throw the ceremonial first pitch. ๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐ŸปIโ€™m now here at the LA Dodger Stadium, where BTSโ€™s V will soon take the mound. Already, not only Dodgers fans but also BTSโ€™s ARMY have gathered, and the atmosphere is very heated. ๐ŸฏFighting! Iโ€™ll do my best. ๐Ÿ’œ Iโ€™m only here for Taehyung honestly. Iโ€™ll stay for the game but Iโ€™m only here for Taehyung. It was very spur of the moment. We had no idea that this was happening until they posted about it. So weโ€™re all just really excited When V appeared on the field to BTS music as the ceremonial pitcher for todayโ€™s game between the LA Dodgers and the Cincinnati Reds, the stadium instantly turned into a concert venue as thunderous cheers erupted. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธfor tonightโ€™s ceremonial first pitch, doing the honors is V! South Korean singer-songwriter and 5 time Grammy nominated group BTS Wearing a Dodgers uniform with the number 7, referencing BTSโ€™s iconic number, V entered the mound, waving in response to the chants of the fans. Even his light warm-up movements drew loud cheers, and the energy of the crowd reached its peak. After receiving the mound from pitcher Yoshinobu Yamamoto, he delivered a windup left-handed throw. ๐Ÿ’œitโ€™s a big deal ๐Ÿ’œWe love you and proud of you. We love you. Weโ€™re so proud of you. Doing great love you. Keep growing. Keep doing what you love! Especially noteworthy was the pre-game meeting between V and Shohei Ohtani, shared on social media. The encounter of two stars representing K-pop and Major League Baseball was recorded as a truly symbolic moment. Vโ€™s ceremonial pitch, as a global star, became a massive sensation not only across the U.S. but also worldwide. After the Dodgers announced his appearance, ticket sales for the game increased fivefold overnight, and ticketing sites even temporarily crashed due to overwhelming demand. ๐Ÿ’œ The ticket prices were low but day by day they kept going higher and higher. As soon as word got out that V was coming the prices skyrocketed. Thatโ€™s how many fans V has. He is all over the world. Global fans also organized unprecedented events. At LAโ€™s major highway junctions, the 710 and 5 Freeways, support videos for V were displayed on billboards. Inside Dodger Stadium, ribbon boards were filled with messages from fans around the world. Chinese fan clubs prepared a giant air banner project, flying an airplane with cheering messages for V above the stadium. On the 27th, soccer player Son Heung-min, who recently transferred to LAFC, will also throw the ceremonial pitch, raising fansโ€™ anticipation once again. This has been Lee Yojung for MBC News. ๐Ÿ”— ACE V ON THE MOUND PITCHER V AT DODGER STADIUM TAEHYUNG TAEHYUNG #VCeremonialFirstPitch #TaehyungxMLB
3:18

[MBC News America] Special segment covering Taehyungโ€™s first pitch at Dodgers! ๐Ÿ‘ค The Dodger Stadium, usually filled with waves of blue, was dyed purple today. Korean flags and cheering banners in Korean stood out all around. These are fans waiting for BTS V to throw the ceremonial first pitch. ๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐ŸปIโ€™m now here at the LA Dodger Stadium, where BTSโ€™s V will soon take the mound. Already, not only Dodgers fans but also BTSโ€™s ARMY have gathered, and the atmosphere is very heated. ๐ŸฏFighting! Iโ€™ll do my best. ๐Ÿ’œ Iโ€™m only here for Taehyung honestly. Iโ€™ll stay for the game but Iโ€™m only here for Taehyung. It was very spur of the moment. We had no idea that this was happening until they posted about it. So weโ€™re all just really excited When V appeared on the field to BTS music as the ceremonial pitcher for todayโ€™s game between the LA Dodgers and the Cincinnati Reds, the stadium instantly turned into a concert venue as thunderous cheers erupted. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธfor tonightโ€™s ceremonial first pitch, doing the honors is V! South Korean singer-songwriter and 5 time Grammy nominated group BTS Wearing a Dodgers uniform with the number 7, referencing BTSโ€™s iconic number, V entered the mound, waving in response to the chants of the fans. Even his light warm-up movements drew loud cheers, and the energy of the crowd reached its peak. After receiving the mound from pitcher Yoshinobu Yamamoto, he delivered a windup left-handed throw. ๐Ÿ’œitโ€™s a big deal ๐Ÿ’œWe love you and proud of you. We love you. Weโ€™re so proud of you. Doing great love you. Keep growing. Keep doing what you love! Especially noteworthy was the pre-game meeting between V and Shohei Ohtani, shared on social media. The encounter of two stars representing K-pop and Major League Baseball was recorded as a truly symbolic moment. Vโ€™s ceremonial pitch, as a global star, became a massive sensation not only across the U.S. but also worldwide. After the Dodgers announced his appearance, ticket sales for the game increased fivefold overnight, and ticketing sites even temporarily crashed due to overwhelming demand. ๐Ÿ’œ The ticket prices were low but day by day they kept going higher and higher. As soon as word got out that V was coming the prices skyrocketed. Thatโ€™s how many fans V has. He is all over the world. Global fans also organized unprecedented events. At LAโ€™s major highway junctions, the 710 and 5 Freeways, support videos for V were displayed on billboards. Inside Dodger Stadium, ribbon boards were filled with messages from fans around the world. Chinese fan clubs prepared a giant air banner project, flying an airplane with cheering messages for V above the stadium. On the 27th, soccer player Son Heung-min, who recently transferred to LAFC, will also throw the ceremonial pitch, raising fansโ€™ anticipation once again. This has been Lee Yojung for MBC News. ๐Ÿ”— ACE V ON THE MOUND PITCHER V AT DODGER STADIUM TAEHYUNG TAEHYUNG #VCeremonialFirstPitch #TaehyungxMLB

Taehyung Naver

71,757 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Liam Roseniorโ€™s Full Pre-Arsenal Press Conference ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on squad rotation & not having a โ€œbest XIโ€ โš™๏ธ โ€œI canโ€™t speak for other managers in terms of myself. I donโ€™t have a best XI. I never have done in all of the clubs that Iโ€™ve worked with. Why? Because of the demands โ€” the physical demands of the Premier League, Ligue 1 or the Championship now with 46 games. You need a squad, and you need to use the players in the correct way to challenge over the course of the season. Iโ€™ve been here three and a half weeks, Iโ€™m still getting to know the players. I try to pick the right starting team, but I also try to pick a bench that gives us the right finishing team. So far, the substitutes in every game have made a huge impact. Thatโ€™s not just tactical โ€” a big part of that is mentality.โ€ ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ’ช ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Estevรฃo โค๏ธ โ€œHe is going through a really difficult time for personal reasons. I wonโ€™t put any pressure on him when he returns. It has to be right for him.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on facing Arsenal โš”๏ธ โ€œThe reality is Arsenal are favourites. Theyโ€™re a goal up and theyโ€™re at home, so theyโ€™ll expect to go through. We need to take it as far and as deep as we can, then hopefully the second half of the tie will be massive in terms of turning it around.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Jamie Gittensโ€™ injury ๐Ÿš‘ โ€œJamie unfortunately felt his hamstring. I donโ€™t yet know the extent of the injury. Itโ€™s a real shame because I wanted to give him a start and allow him to show what he can do. Hopefully itโ€™s not too bad.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Chelseaโ€™s mentality in big games ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œThey can play in big games and they can perform in big games โ€” and it is definitely a big game on Tuesday.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on focus & preparation ๐ŸงŠ โ€œTalking about what Arsenal or Mikel Arteta have or havenโ€™t done isnโ€™t my concern. My concern is resting and recovering. Itโ€™s another three-game week. Itโ€™s going to be a very physical game on Tuesday, and my job is to prepare the team as best I can.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Arsenalโ€™s recent nerves ๐Ÿ˜Œ โ€œWeโ€™ll see. Weโ€™ll see. Weโ€™ll go and play our game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on experience within his squad ๐Ÿ† โ€œWhen I look at my players โ€” Enzo Fernandez has won a World Cup, and the group won two trophies last year. They can play in big games, they can perform in big games. Tuesday is definitely a big game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Enzo Fernรกndez ๐Ÿง โšก โ€œHeโ€™s fit. You see him arriving in the box in the 92nd, 93rd minute. Enzo has a rare athleticism โ€” a gift โ€” where he recovers very quickly. His distances covered are top from a data point of view, and the quality and leadership he brings to the team is huge. Iโ€™m really enjoying working with him.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Mamadou Sarr ๐Ÿค โ€œI donโ€™t speak about players who are at other clubs. Itโ€™s something Iโ€™ve never done, and I wonโ€™t start today.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on pressure & proving himself ๐ŸŽฏ โ€œIโ€™ll be really honest โ€” all this talk about proof of whether Iโ€™m right for the job or not, I donโ€™t really care. Iโ€™m here to do the job. If we get to the final, itโ€™s great for Chelsea Football Club. Itโ€™s not about me. Iโ€™ll prove in time whether Iโ€™m worthy or not, but itโ€™s not at the forefront of my mind.โ€
3:53

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Liam Roseniorโ€™s Full Pre-Arsenal Press Conference ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on squad rotation & not having a โ€œbest XIโ€ โš™๏ธ โ€œI canโ€™t speak for other managers in terms of myself. I donโ€™t have a best XI. I never have done in all of the clubs that Iโ€™ve worked with. Why? Because of the demands โ€” the physical demands of the Premier League, Ligue 1 or the Championship now with 46 games. You need a squad, and you need to use the players in the correct way to challenge over the course of the season. Iโ€™ve been here three and a half weeks, Iโ€™m still getting to know the players. I try to pick the right starting team, but I also try to pick a bench that gives us the right finishing team. So far, the substitutes in every game have made a huge impact. Thatโ€™s not just tactical โ€” a big part of that is mentality.โ€ ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ’ช ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Estevรฃo โค๏ธ โ€œHe is going through a really difficult time for personal reasons. I wonโ€™t put any pressure on him when he returns. It has to be right for him.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on facing Arsenal โš”๏ธ โ€œThe reality is Arsenal are favourites. Theyโ€™re a goal up and theyโ€™re at home, so theyโ€™ll expect to go through. We need to take it as far and as deep as we can, then hopefully the second half of the tie will be massive in terms of turning it around.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Jamie Gittensโ€™ injury ๐Ÿš‘ โ€œJamie unfortunately felt his hamstring. I donโ€™t yet know the extent of the injury. Itโ€™s a real shame because I wanted to give him a start and allow him to show what he can do. Hopefully itโ€™s not too bad.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Chelseaโ€™s mentality in big games ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œThey can play in big games and they can perform in big games โ€” and it is definitely a big game on Tuesday.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on focus & preparation ๐ŸงŠ โ€œTalking about what Arsenal or Mikel Arteta have or havenโ€™t done isnโ€™t my concern. My concern is resting and recovering. Itโ€™s another three-game week. Itโ€™s going to be a very physical game on Tuesday, and my job is to prepare the team as best I can.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Arsenalโ€™s recent nerves ๐Ÿ˜Œ โ€œWeโ€™ll see. Weโ€™ll see. Weโ€™ll go and play our game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on experience within his squad ๐Ÿ† โ€œWhen I look at my players โ€” Enzo Fernandez has won a World Cup, and the group won two trophies last year. They can play in big games, they can perform in big games. Tuesday is definitely a big game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Enzo Fernรกndez ๐Ÿง โšก โ€œHeโ€™s fit. You see him arriving in the box in the 92nd, 93rd minute. Enzo has a rare athleticism โ€” a gift โ€” where he recovers very quickly. His distances covered are top from a data point of view, and the quality and leadership he brings to the team is huge. Iโ€™m really enjoying working with him.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Mamadou Sarr ๐Ÿค โ€œI donโ€™t speak about players who are at other clubs. Itโ€™s something Iโ€™ve never done, and I wonโ€™t start today.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on pressure & proving himself ๐ŸŽฏ โ€œIโ€™ll be really honest โ€” all this talk about proof of whether Iโ€™m right for the job or not, I donโ€™t really care. Iโ€™m here to do the job. If we get to the final, itโ€™s great for Chelsea Football Club. Itโ€™s not about me. Iโ€™ll prove in time whether Iโ€™m worthy or not, but itโ€™s not at the forefront of my mind.โ€

Miki Djan

72,283 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 7 ay รถnce

There Is No Antisemitism Crisis In Australia. Itโ€™s A Carefully Constructed Lie. The Murdoch-owned Daily Telegraph has been caught trying to orchestrate what can only be described as a mass media psyop to inflame public hysteria about antisemitism in Australia. In a project internally titled โ€œUNDERCOVERJEWโ€ supposedly designed to show โ€œwhat itโ€™s like being Jewish in Sydneyโ€, a man wearing a Star of David hat and video glasses went around targeting Muslim and Arab businesses trying to instigate hostility from staff members trailed by a video producer and a Telegraph reporter. The man, who is reportedly associated with the Australian Jewish Association, entered an Egyptian cafe called Cairo Takeaway and postured with his Star of David hat without getting any reaction from anyone. He then started making comments to cafe staff, who caught on to what he was doing and started recording him. Police were then called and it caused a big scandal. Itโ€™s obvious that the intention here was to instigate something that could be framed as an โ€œantisemitic incidentโ€ and provoke a national outcry and draw all the usual fiery denunciations from Australian officials, followed by arguments citing the incident as evidence that Australia needs even more aggressive speech laws to stomp out all criticism of the genocidal apartheid state of Israel. And it should here be noted that The Daily Telegraph is owned by News Corp, the Murdoch media conglomerate which dominates the Australian press. Rupert Murdoch became the media giant he is with the help of his ties with the Ronald Reagan administration and US government agencies. Also noteworthy is that Murdoch is a board member and significant shareholder of Genie Energy, which holds a contract to drill for oil and gas in the Golan Heights โ€” territory illegally occupied by Israel. This is just the latest in a spate of incidents in which a narrative about an urgent epidemic of antisemitism in Australia is being marketed to the public based on false information. Just today we learned from The Sydney Morning Herald that the Dural caravan laden with explosive materials we were told a couple of weeks ago was intended for use in a โ€œmass casualty eventโ€ targeting Jewish sites was not only full of unusable 40 year-old explosives with no detonator, but was involved in a scheme by underworld crime gangs to help negotiate reduced sentences with law enforcement. The entire Australian political-media class lost their minds about this story when it first came out. The words โ€œantisemiticโ€ and โ€œantisemitismโ€ were rife throughout the Australian press. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese declared that โ€œThereโ€™s zero tolerance in Australia for hatred and for antisemitism, and I want any perpetrators to be hunted down and locked up.โ€ The federal governmentโ€™s special envoy on antisemitism, Jillian Segal, called the incident a โ€œchilling reminder that the same hatred that led to the murder of millions of Jews during the Holocaust still exists todayโ€. And it had nothing to do with antisemitism. At all. We saw a similar incident earlier this month when headlines blared about an โ€œantisemitic attackโ€ at Bondi Beach involving eggs being thrown at a group of young women. A couple of days later it came out that the egging was perpetrated by two teenagers getting up to teenage mischief and had nothing to do with anyone hating Jews. Right now weโ€™re seeing an uproar over two Arab Australian nurses who were baited by an Israeli influencer into saying on the website Chatruletka that they would kill Israelis if they came into their hospital. The comments by the nurses were obviously extremely ill-advised and unethical, but a police investigation has so far found that theyโ€™ve never harmed anybody, and if you watch the extended footage of the exchange itโ€™s clear the influencer went out of his way to inform them that he served in the Israeli military and killed Palestinians. One of the nurses has reportedly lost 70 family members to Israeli atrocities in Palestine. Without defending the irresponsible comments of the nurses, I donโ€™t think anyone would expect a Jewish person who came in contact with a Nazi soldier in the 1940s to maintain their cool and avoid violent speech, much less so if that person had lost family members in the Holocaust, and even less if they believed they were having a conversation in private. These chat roulette sites are not intended as mass public broadcast forums; people participating in them tend to interact on the assumption that they are having a private conversation, so the exchange should be viewed as angry words being hurled at a perceived abuser, not as a public declaration of intent to harm others. I donโ€™t condone a healthcare provider saying sheโ€™d kill Israeli nationals in her hospital, even if she has lost scores of family members in the Gaza holocaust. But I also wouldnโ€™t confuse what I was seeing with evidence of an antisemitism crisis in Australia. There is a concerted effort to manufacture the illusion of an antisemitism crisis in Australia in order to protect Israeli information interests โ€” and the call isnโ€™t coming entirely from inside the house. Albanese has acknowledged that the perpetrators of a spate of allegedly antisemitic attacks in this country may have been paid actors working for foreign operatives. The prime minister refused to speculate as to which country might be sponsoring these incidents which just so happen to greatly benefit the interests of Israel, but you donโ€™t exactly need to be Sherlock Holmes to narrow it down. And some of these so-called โ€œantisemiticโ€ incidents are so obviously staged it hurts. When you see graffiti on a synagogue with โ€œFree Palestineโ€ written next to swastikas, it calls to mind the Mississippi man who notoriously claimed in 2015 that his driveway had been vandalized by black activists with graffiti that said โ€œBLACKS RULEโ€. Apparently weโ€™re all supposed to take very seriously the idea that either (A) Nazis are spray painting the words โ€œFree Palestineโ€ next to their swastikas, or (B) that supporters of Palestinian rights are spray painting Nazi symbols next to their pro-Palestinian slogans. And we are never meant to consider the possibility that this incident was staged by Israelโ€™s supporters or by paid actors working for foreign Zionists. It is always okay to express skepticism about dubious incidents of โ€œantisemitismโ€ in todayโ€™s political environment. Israelโ€™s supporters are shitty, evil people who support genocide, and faking antisemitic incidents is a standard hasbara tactic with a well-documented history. There is no antisemitism crisis in Australia. There is an anti-Palestinian crisis in Australia. An anti-Arab crisis in Australia. A pro-genocide crisis in Australia. The fact that our politicians and media have been shrieking their lungs out 24/7/365 about a made-up epidemic of abuse against Jews while standing with Israel and its American sponsors as they demolish Gaza and prepare to ethnically cleanse a Palestinian territory shows that there is indeed something deeply and profoundly sick about our society โ€” but that sickness has nothing to do with antisemitism. There are of course people with hateful attitudes and superstitions toward Jews to be found in any country, but they are a small fringe group whose beliefs have far less meaningful impact on peopleโ€™s lives than prejudices against Palestinians, immigrants, or Indigenous Australians. The average Australian spends very little time thinking about Jews and Jewishness one way or the other, and weโ€™d spend far less if we werenโ€™t constantly being bombarded with false messaging about how our country is full of dangerous Jew haters. Antisemitism exists in the same way discrimination against divorced mothers exists; it used to be a major issue that did great harm, but in terms of how much it actually affects peopleโ€™s lives in modern secular times itโ€™s mostly just an obsolete relic of the past. As a divorced mother I might run into the occasional weirdo on the internet calling me a harlot if I mention my personal history, but life is infinitely easier for people like me than it was a century ago. Antisemitism is the same. Generally when you hear people talking about incidents of antisemitism it falls into three separate categories which are too often conflated: 1. People conflating support for Palestinians and criticism of Israel with hatred of Jews. This is the most common category by an extremely massive margin. 2. People conflating October 7 with a Holocaust-like event in which Jews were murdered simply for being Jewish. In reality October 7 was an act of desperation by the oppressed inhabitants of a giant concentration camp, and they would have killed their oppressors regardless of their religion. 3. Real hatred of Jewish people and real attacks on Jews because they are Jewish. This, while relatively uncommon, is being made more common by Israelโ€™s practice of committing genocide under a Star of David flag while claiming to represent all Jews. Israel apologists always go out of their way to conflate these three categories. The Anti-Defamation League officially made this conflation a standard practice in 2023 by categorizing incidents of pro-Palestinian activism as antisemitic incidents. The Anti-Defamation League recently drew controversy by saying that Elon Muskโ€™s infamous Nazi salute was not antisemitic, while weโ€™re on the subject. There is no antisemitism crisis in Australia. As The Daily Telegraph and their agent provocateur found out, antisemitism is one crisis we donโ€™t have. They tried to provoke an antisemitic reaction, and they failed. No one cared. The real crisis in Australia is that we are the kind of country that would sit and watch a live-streamed genocide without moving heaven and earth to stop it. We have a morality crisis. An apathy crisis. A crisis of our hearts, minds and souls. But what we do not have in this country, in any meaningful way, is an antisemitism crisis. Reading by Caitlin Johnstone.
11:03

There Is No Antisemitism Crisis In Australia. Itโ€™s A Carefully Constructed Lie. The Murdoch-owned Daily Telegraph has been caught trying to orchestrate what can only be described as a mass media psyop to inflame public hysteria about antisemitism in Australia. In a project internally titled โ€œUNDERCOVERJEWโ€ supposedly designed to show โ€œwhat itโ€™s like being Jewish in Sydneyโ€, a man wearing a Star of David hat and video glasses went around targeting Muslim and Arab businesses trying to instigate hostility from staff members trailed by a video producer and a Telegraph reporter. The man, who is reportedly associated with the Australian Jewish Association, entered an Egyptian cafe called Cairo Takeaway and postured with his Star of David hat without getting any reaction from anyone. He then started making comments to cafe staff, who caught on to what he was doing and started recording him. Police were then called and it caused a big scandal. Itโ€™s obvious that the intention here was to instigate something that could be framed as an โ€œantisemitic incidentโ€ and provoke a national outcry and draw all the usual fiery denunciations from Australian officials, followed by arguments citing the incident as evidence that Australia needs even more aggressive speech laws to stomp out all criticism of the genocidal apartheid state of Israel. And it should here be noted that The Daily Telegraph is owned by News Corp, the Murdoch media conglomerate which dominates the Australian press. Rupert Murdoch became the media giant he is with the help of his ties with the Ronald Reagan administration and US government agencies. Also noteworthy is that Murdoch is a board member and significant shareholder of Genie Energy, which holds a contract to drill for oil and gas in the Golan Heights โ€” territory illegally occupied by Israel. This is just the latest in a spate of incidents in which a narrative about an urgent epidemic of antisemitism in Australia is being marketed to the public based on false information. Just today we learned from The Sydney Morning Herald that the Dural caravan laden with explosive materials we were told a couple of weeks ago was intended for use in a โ€œmass casualty eventโ€ targeting Jewish sites was not only full of unusable 40 year-old explosives with no detonator, but was involved in a scheme by underworld crime gangs to help negotiate reduced sentences with law enforcement. The entire Australian political-media class lost their minds about this story when it first came out. The words โ€œantisemiticโ€ and โ€œantisemitismโ€ were rife throughout the Australian press. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese declared that โ€œThereโ€™s zero tolerance in Australia for hatred and for antisemitism, and I want any perpetrators to be hunted down and locked up.โ€ The federal governmentโ€™s special envoy on antisemitism, Jillian Segal, called the incident a โ€œchilling reminder that the same hatred that led to the murder of millions of Jews during the Holocaust still exists todayโ€. And it had nothing to do with antisemitism. At all. We saw a similar incident earlier this month when headlines blared about an โ€œantisemitic attackโ€ at Bondi Beach involving eggs being thrown at a group of young women. A couple of days later it came out that the egging was perpetrated by two teenagers getting up to teenage mischief and had nothing to do with anyone hating Jews. Right now weโ€™re seeing an uproar over two Arab Australian nurses who were baited by an Israeli influencer into saying on the website Chatruletka that they would kill Israelis if they came into their hospital. The comments by the nurses were obviously extremely ill-advised and unethical, but a police investigation has so far found that theyโ€™ve never harmed anybody, and if you watch the extended footage of the exchange itโ€™s clear the influencer went out of his way to inform them that he served in the Israeli military and killed Palestinians. One of the nurses has reportedly lost 70 family members to Israeli atrocities in Palestine. Without defending the irresponsible comments of the nurses, I donโ€™t think anyone would expect a Jewish person who came in contact with a Nazi soldier in the 1940s to maintain their cool and avoid violent speech, much less so if that person had lost family members in the Holocaust, and even less if they believed they were having a conversation in private. These chat roulette sites are not intended as mass public broadcast forums; people participating in them tend to interact on the assumption that they are having a private conversation, so the exchange should be viewed as angry words being hurled at a perceived abuser, not as a public declaration of intent to harm others. I donโ€™t condone a healthcare provider saying sheโ€™d kill Israeli nationals in her hospital, even if she has lost scores of family members in the Gaza holocaust. But I also wouldnโ€™t confuse what I was seeing with evidence of an antisemitism crisis in Australia. There is a concerted effort to manufacture the illusion of an antisemitism crisis in Australia in order to protect Israeli information interests โ€” and the call isnโ€™t coming entirely from inside the house. Albanese has acknowledged that the perpetrators of a spate of allegedly antisemitic attacks in this country may have been paid actors working for foreign operatives. The prime minister refused to speculate as to which country might be sponsoring these incidents which just so happen to greatly benefit the interests of Israel, but you donโ€™t exactly need to be Sherlock Holmes to narrow it down. And some of these so-called โ€œantisemiticโ€ incidents are so obviously staged it hurts. When you see graffiti on a synagogue with โ€œFree Palestineโ€ written next to swastikas, it calls to mind the Mississippi man who notoriously claimed in 2015 that his driveway had been vandalized by black activists with graffiti that said โ€œBLACKS RULEโ€. Apparently weโ€™re all supposed to take very seriously the idea that either (A) Nazis are spray painting the words โ€œFree Palestineโ€ next to their swastikas, or (B) that supporters of Palestinian rights are spray painting Nazi symbols next to their pro-Palestinian slogans. And we are never meant to consider the possibility that this incident was staged by Israelโ€™s supporters or by paid actors working for foreign Zionists. It is always okay to express skepticism about dubious incidents of โ€œantisemitismโ€ in todayโ€™s political environment. Israelโ€™s supporters are shitty, evil people who support genocide, and faking antisemitic incidents is a standard hasbara tactic with a well-documented history. There is no antisemitism crisis in Australia. There is an anti-Palestinian crisis in Australia. An anti-Arab crisis in Australia. A pro-genocide crisis in Australia. The fact that our politicians and media have been shrieking their lungs out 24/7/365 about a made-up epidemic of abuse against Jews while standing with Israel and its American sponsors as they demolish Gaza and prepare to ethnically cleanse a Palestinian territory shows that there is indeed something deeply and profoundly sick about our society โ€” but that sickness has nothing to do with antisemitism. There are of course people with hateful attitudes and superstitions toward Jews to be found in any country, but they are a small fringe group whose beliefs have far less meaningful impact on peopleโ€™s lives than prejudices against Palestinians, immigrants, or Indigenous Australians. The average Australian spends very little time thinking about Jews and Jewishness one way or the other, and weโ€™d spend far less if we werenโ€™t constantly being bombarded with false messaging about how our country is full of dangerous Jew haters. Antisemitism exists in the same way discrimination against divorced mothers exists; it used to be a major issue that did great harm, but in terms of how much it actually affects peopleโ€™s lives in modern secular times itโ€™s mostly just an obsolete relic of the past. As a divorced mother I might run into the occasional weirdo on the internet calling me a harlot if I mention my personal history, but life is infinitely easier for people like me than it was a century ago. Antisemitism is the same. Generally when you hear people talking about incidents of antisemitism it falls into three separate categories which are too often conflated: 1. People conflating support for Palestinians and criticism of Israel with hatred of Jews. This is the most common category by an extremely massive margin. 2. People conflating October 7 with a Holocaust-like event in which Jews were murdered simply for being Jewish. In reality October 7 was an act of desperation by the oppressed inhabitants of a giant concentration camp, and they would have killed their oppressors regardless of their religion. 3. Real hatred of Jewish people and real attacks on Jews because they are Jewish. This, while relatively uncommon, is being made more common by Israelโ€™s practice of committing genocide under a Star of David flag while claiming to represent all Jews. Israel apologists always go out of their way to conflate these three categories. The Anti-Defamation League officially made this conflation a standard practice in 2023 by categorizing incidents of pro-Palestinian activism as antisemitic incidents. The Anti-Defamation League recently drew controversy by saying that Elon Muskโ€™s infamous Nazi salute was not antisemitic, while weโ€™re on the subject. There is no antisemitism crisis in Australia. As The Daily Telegraph and their agent provocateur found out, antisemitism is one crisis we donโ€™t have. They tried to provoke an antisemitic reaction, and they failed. No one cared. The real crisis in Australia is that we are the kind of country that would sit and watch a live-streamed genocide without moving heaven and earth to stop it. We have a morality crisis. An apathy crisis. A crisis of our hearts, minds and souls. But what we do not have in this country, in any meaningful way, is an antisemitism crisis. Reading by Caitlin Johnstone.

Caitlin Johnstone

255,767 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

CHARLIE KIRK, POLITICAL ASS*SSINATIONS, AND THE B'NAI B'RITH (Warning: For Elite Pattern Recognizers Only) Candace Owens โ–ถ๏ธ This is a long post, and won't get very good reach unless you heavily interact with it. Please give it a like, a bookmark, a comment and a retweet. Or else it will just die. 5 minutes to read, 5 minutes to watch the video. But in 10 minutes you'll get an advanced class on B'nai B'rith and ass*ssinations that took me months of research to put together. If you watched Candace Owens yesterday, you learned a little about the B'nai B'rith, a jewish masonic secret society/fraternal order, & its related institution, the ADL. I clocked the ADL 4 days after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated. By October 4th, I was openly suspecting them of allegedly playing some kind of role in the hit. But to understand why I suspected to find their involvement, we must review some history. Then we can apply it to Charlie Kirk's ass*ssination. The B'nai B'rith/ADL were materially involved in the JFK, RFK, & MLK ass*ssinations: โ–ช๏ธJFKโ–ช๏ธ B'nai B'rith member Julius Schepps was President of the Dallas Citizens Council, the organization that invited JFK to Dallas the fateful day of the ass*ssination. It's believed Abraham Zapruder, the jew who captured the infamous footage, was also a member of the B'nai B'rith. Zapruder's office was in the Dal-Tex building (which was next to the Texas School Book Depository) where dozens of witnesses attested that multiple gunshots came from. The Dal-Tex building was owned by the jews David Weisblat and Morris J. Russ until November 1, 1963, when it was transferred to Russ's widow Sylvia Golden Russ just 3 weeks before the ass*ssination. David Weisblat worked for the Anti-Defamation League of the Bโ€™nai Bโ€™rith. The ADL. Perhaps to get ahead of things, the B'nai B'rith awarded JFK a presidential Gold Medal on January 31, 1963, while he was mired in a battle with israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion over israel's illicit nuclear program. What better way to deflect blame! "He was our greatest ally!" Sound familiar? โ–ช๏ธRFKโ–ช๏ธ RFK's Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz, was the Civil Rights Director for the western branch of the Anti-Defamation League of Bโ€™nai Bโ€™rith. The ADL. It was Mankiewicz who diverted RFK from exiting out the ballroom of the Ambassador Hotel as planned and into the kitchen where Sirhan Sirhan & Thane Eugene Cesar were waiting to shoot him. At the time, the Ambassador Hotel was owned by the jew Junius Myer Schine, who once upon a time allowed the jewish gangster Mickey Cohen to operate an illegal casino inside the hotel. Mickey Cohen had a famous stripper girlfriend named Candy Barr whom he notoriously shared with JACK RUBY and jewish terrorist/israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin (Begin was leader of the Irgun & mastermind of the King David Hotel bombing in 1946. He also founded the Likud, the party that Netanyahu is a member of, which is currently running israel). RFK's DOJ had previously sent Mickey Cohen to prison for 15 years, after RFK personally grilled Cohen in televised senate hearings. BONUS: Junius Schine's son David was mentored by the homosexual jewish fixer Roy Cohn, and they both made the cover of Time Magazine for their central role in the famous Army-McCarthy senate hearings. David would go on to marry Miss Universe 1955, Hillevi Rombin of Sweden (I'll note that the Miss Universe Pageant was owned by jews at the time). Later, Roy Cohn would mentor another young man in the New York real estate scene named Donald J. Trump. Trump would later buy the Ambassador Hotel AND the Miss Universe Pageant! (Try not to notice the intersection between pageants, modeling, and the so-called Epstein network. But, I digress. Lol). โ–ช๏ธMLKโ–ช๏ธ The ADL had of course been a long-time partner and ally with MLK in the Civil Rights movement. However, according to Henry Schwarzschildโ€”who worked in the ADLโ€™s publications department from 1962 to 1964โ€”the ADL monitored (spied on) King because it considered him a "loose cannon", and the ADL periodically passed information on King to the FBI. Schwarzschild alleged this was โ€œcommon and casually accepted knowledgeโ€ within the ADL. Later, MLK & his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was targeted by the FBI's infamous COINTELPRO. During that entire era, the ADL was known to collaborate closely with the FBI, just as they do now. For years, the ADL has trained every FBI agent. But there's an even deeper & more specific connection between the ADL and the MLK assassination. James Earl Ray's handler Raul once gave Ray an "emergency phone number" of sorts. Raul was a known business associate of Jack Rubyโ€”why does he keep popping up? Raul was also involved in an illegal arms trafficking operation smuggling weapons to israel. This phone number Raul gave a Ray was to Samuel Laventhal, owner of Marine Supply and Salvage Co. of New Orleans. Laventhal was a member of the B'nai B'rith & Zionist Organization of America. In the initial appeal of his conviction, Ray reported that Laventhal was "distressed" about MLK's forthcoming public support for Palestine. Later, in 1978, Ray testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations that someone in MLK's organization had made contact with the Palestinians about a potential alliance, and that King "intended to support the Arab cause." MLK had already famously 'left the pro-israel cause' when he canceled his much-publicized trip to israel scheduled for November 1967. MLK had soured on israel after its aggression in the 6-Day War placed him in a difficult political position with the 3rd world, with whom he was building a coalition. It was sometime after King's israel trip cancelation that Ray learned from Laventhal of MLK's allegiance switch (Remember, the ADL of the B'nai B'rith was spying on MLK & his organization). But before an alliance with Palestine could be worked out & publicly announced, King was murdered on April 4, 1968, and Ray was framed as the lone gunman patsy. We should note that the cover alias James Earl Ray somehow obtained and assumed while he was on the run was Eric S. Galt, a man who had national security clearance and was the manager of a Union Carbide plant manufacturing proximity bomb fuses being illegally smuggled to israel. Very weird! BACK TO CHARLIE KIRK Knowing this information, and having already noted many troubling similarities between Charlie's ass*ssination and the 3 ass*ssinations mentioned above, I was on the lookout for signs of ADL involvement. The B'nai B'rith is an underground network (literally) that could theoretically facilitate surreptitious planning, collaboration and coordination. Allegedly. I've written extensively about the battle Charlie was waging against the ADL since he joined us in September 2023 calling to #BanTheADL. Search my timeline for "Charlie AND ADL" For its part, the ADL had included TPUSA in its infamous "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." Charlie called to ban the ADL multiple times in September 2023. He called it an anti-White hate group. In November 2023, he declared the ADL was "part and parcel with Black Lives Matter" and "went all in on woke." He included them as one of the Left-wing jewish groups that was pushing the radical open borders and quasi-marxist policies ruining America. At the same time that Charlie was attacking the ADL in the fall of 2023, the ADL was on record proclaiming that America had a GenZ/TikTok problem regarding support for israel, and it launched a set of major initiatives to help reclaim America's youth. Many of these initiatives centered on college campuses and social mediaโ€”two arenas dominated by Charlie Kirk. After Charlie's ass*ssination, the ADL published a hit piece on people alleging that israel was behind Charlie's murder. Their "Glossary On Extremism & Hate" began to circulate online and they were pressured to shut it down, which they did on September 30th, 2025. In early October, Kash Patel piled on, announcing that the FBI would be severing its longstanding ties with the ADL. (I've seen little evidence for this actually happening, btw). He also announced an end to the FBI's partnership with the SPLC, another radical jewish organization that had been attacking Charlie and TPUSA. It was at that point that a most curious thing happened: on October 3rd, Marissa Streit, former member of IDF Unit 8200 & CEO of PragerU, attacked the ADL & SPLCโ€”which I clocked at time as being kosher theater. We should also note that according to Ben Shapiro, the Daily Wire shared space, talent and equipment with PragerU when both organizations were in their infancy. This will soon become more important in our story. Here's what I think was (allegedly) happening: the Conspirators were using the ADL and its adversarial relationship to TPUSA & Charlie Kirk to help cement the narrative that Charlie was murdered because of radical Leftist hate. That's why the ADL took down its "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." That's why Kash Patel publicly distanced the FBI from the ADL. And that's why fellow jewish intelligence operative Marissa Streit denounced it the ADL. But that's just one interpretation of the facts and I'm not accusing anyone specifically of a crime. Do your own research and make up your own mind. Right after that, on October 4th, 2025, Candace Owens found out that Kash Patel had flown in the agents from the FBI's Connecticut Office to "investigate" at UVU. That's the FBI office that shares building space with the ADL. At that point, I'd seen enough, and I started publicly airing my initially private hypothesis that the ADL was likely materially involved with Charlie's ass*ssination. But my tenuous alleged hypothesis was strengthened yesterday when we found out that Ben Shapiro was having a breakfast/lunch meeting with the Gary Javitchโ€”Former Executive Director of B'nai B'rith International & former president of the Henry Monsky Lodge of the B'nai B'rith & member of the ADLโ€”when Ben found out about the hit on Charlie almost right away. Within about 5 minutes or less, Ben's IDF security team was on the phone with someone in Charlie's SUV while it sped Charlie to the hospital. Mind-boggingly weird & dumbfounding. I'm not making any accusations of guilt, I want to be very clear about that. But this is a troubling set of facts and patterns that I believe looks like more than a coincidence. Why the heck would the security team of a long-time enemy to Charlie be on phone with Charlie's security team as it raced Charlie to the hospital? And while Shapiro just happened to be in a meeting with a high-level member of the ADL & the B'nai B'rith?! What. Are. The. Odds? And let's not forget that after months without any interaction, and knowing that Charlie saw Ben Shapiro as an adversary, Andrew Kolvet booked Shapiro as Charlie's guest the day before Charlie was assassinated. The same day Charlie proclaimed that he was leaving the pro-israel cause. The same day that Charlie likely had a Zoom struggle session with Rabbi Wolicki and Josh Hammer (who is a close friend of Ben Shapiro). The same day that Charlie texted multiple people the cryptic 'they're going to kill me.' And then within a week, Ben was hosting the Charlie Kirk Show and proclaiming he'd pick up the bloody mic? I'm sorry, but given all this context I've painstakingly recounted, am I the only one who thinks we deserve an explanation? WTF, Shapiro? โ–ช๏ธLike, retweet, reply, bookmarkโ–ช๏ธ
5:40

CHARLIE KIRK, POLITICAL ASS*SSINATIONS, AND THE B'NAI B'RITH (Warning: For Elite Pattern Recognizers Only) Candace Owens โ–ถ๏ธ This is a long post, and won't get very good reach unless you heavily interact with it. Please give it a like, a bookmark, a comment and a retweet. Or else it will just die. 5 minutes to read, 5 minutes to watch the video. But in 10 minutes you'll get an advanced class on B'nai B'rith and ass*ssinations that took me months of research to put together. If you watched Candace Owens yesterday, you learned a little about the B'nai B'rith, a jewish masonic secret society/fraternal order, & its related institution, the ADL. I clocked the ADL 4 days after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated. By October 4th, I was openly suspecting them of allegedly playing some kind of role in the hit. But to understand why I suspected to find their involvement, we must review some history. Then we can apply it to Charlie Kirk's ass*ssination. The B'nai B'rith/ADL were materially involved in the JFK, RFK, & MLK ass*ssinations: โ–ช๏ธJFKโ–ช๏ธ B'nai B'rith member Julius Schepps was President of the Dallas Citizens Council, the organization that invited JFK to Dallas the fateful day of the ass*ssination. It's believed Abraham Zapruder, the jew who captured the infamous footage, was also a member of the B'nai B'rith. Zapruder's office was in the Dal-Tex building (which was next to the Texas School Book Depository) where dozens of witnesses attested that multiple gunshots came from. The Dal-Tex building was owned by the jews David Weisblat and Morris J. Russ until November 1, 1963, when it was transferred to Russ's widow Sylvia Golden Russ just 3 weeks before the ass*ssination. David Weisblat worked for the Anti-Defamation League of the Bโ€™nai Bโ€™rith. The ADL. Perhaps to get ahead of things, the B'nai B'rith awarded JFK a presidential Gold Medal on January 31, 1963, while he was mired in a battle with israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion over israel's illicit nuclear program. What better way to deflect blame! "He was our greatest ally!" Sound familiar? โ–ช๏ธRFKโ–ช๏ธ RFK's Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz, was the Civil Rights Director for the western branch of the Anti-Defamation League of Bโ€™nai Bโ€™rith. The ADL. It was Mankiewicz who diverted RFK from exiting out the ballroom of the Ambassador Hotel as planned and into the kitchen where Sirhan Sirhan & Thane Eugene Cesar were waiting to shoot him. At the time, the Ambassador Hotel was owned by the jew Junius Myer Schine, who once upon a time allowed the jewish gangster Mickey Cohen to operate an illegal casino inside the hotel. Mickey Cohen had a famous stripper girlfriend named Candy Barr whom he notoriously shared with JACK RUBY and jewish terrorist/israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin (Begin was leader of the Irgun & mastermind of the King David Hotel bombing in 1946. He also founded the Likud, the party that Netanyahu is a member of, which is currently running israel). RFK's DOJ had previously sent Mickey Cohen to prison for 15 years, after RFK personally grilled Cohen in televised senate hearings. BONUS: Junius Schine's son David was mentored by the homosexual jewish fixer Roy Cohn, and they both made the cover of Time Magazine for their central role in the famous Army-McCarthy senate hearings. David would go on to marry Miss Universe 1955, Hillevi Rombin of Sweden (I'll note that the Miss Universe Pageant was owned by jews at the time). Later, Roy Cohn would mentor another young man in the New York real estate scene named Donald J. Trump. Trump would later buy the Ambassador Hotel AND the Miss Universe Pageant! (Try not to notice the intersection between pageants, modeling, and the so-called Epstein network. But, I digress. Lol). โ–ช๏ธMLKโ–ช๏ธ The ADL had of course been a long-time partner and ally with MLK in the Civil Rights movement. However, according to Henry Schwarzschildโ€”who worked in the ADLโ€™s publications department from 1962 to 1964โ€”the ADL monitored (spied on) King because it considered him a "loose cannon", and the ADL periodically passed information on King to the FBI. Schwarzschild alleged this was โ€œcommon and casually accepted knowledgeโ€ within the ADL. Later, MLK & his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was targeted by the FBI's infamous COINTELPRO. During that entire era, the ADL was known to collaborate closely with the FBI, just as they do now. For years, the ADL has trained every FBI agent. But there's an even deeper & more specific connection between the ADL and the MLK assassination. James Earl Ray's handler Raul once gave Ray an "emergency phone number" of sorts. Raul was a known business associate of Jack Rubyโ€”why does he keep popping up? Raul was also involved in an illegal arms trafficking operation smuggling weapons to israel. This phone number Raul gave a Ray was to Samuel Laventhal, owner of Marine Supply and Salvage Co. of New Orleans. Laventhal was a member of the B'nai B'rith & Zionist Organization of America. In the initial appeal of his conviction, Ray reported that Laventhal was "distressed" about MLK's forthcoming public support for Palestine. Later, in 1978, Ray testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations that someone in MLK's organization had made contact with the Palestinians about a potential alliance, and that King "intended to support the Arab cause." MLK had already famously 'left the pro-israel cause' when he canceled his much-publicized trip to israel scheduled for November 1967. MLK had soured on israel after its aggression in the 6-Day War placed him in a difficult political position with the 3rd world, with whom he was building a coalition. It was sometime after King's israel trip cancelation that Ray learned from Laventhal of MLK's allegiance switch (Remember, the ADL of the B'nai B'rith was spying on MLK & his organization). But before an alliance with Palestine could be worked out & publicly announced, King was murdered on April 4, 1968, and Ray was framed as the lone gunman patsy. We should note that the cover alias James Earl Ray somehow obtained and assumed while he was on the run was Eric S. Galt, a man who had national security clearance and was the manager of a Union Carbide plant manufacturing proximity bomb fuses being illegally smuggled to israel. Very weird! BACK TO CHARLIE KIRK Knowing this information, and having already noted many troubling similarities between Charlie's ass*ssination and the 3 ass*ssinations mentioned above, I was on the lookout for signs of ADL involvement. The B'nai B'rith is an underground network (literally) that could theoretically facilitate surreptitious planning, collaboration and coordination. Allegedly. I've written extensively about the battle Charlie was waging against the ADL since he joined us in September 2023 calling to #BanTheADL. Search my timeline for "Charlie AND ADL" For its part, the ADL had included TPUSA in its infamous "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." Charlie called to ban the ADL multiple times in September 2023. He called it an anti-White hate group. In November 2023, he declared the ADL was "part and parcel with Black Lives Matter" and "went all in on woke." He included them as one of the Left-wing jewish groups that was pushing the radical open borders and quasi-marxist policies ruining America. At the same time that Charlie was attacking the ADL in the fall of 2023, the ADL was on record proclaiming that America had a GenZ/TikTok problem regarding support for israel, and it launched a set of major initiatives to help reclaim America's youth. Many of these initiatives centered on college campuses and social mediaโ€”two arenas dominated by Charlie Kirk. After Charlie's ass*ssination, the ADL published a hit piece on people alleging that israel was behind Charlie's murder. Their "Glossary On Extremism & Hate" began to circulate online and they were pressured to shut it down, which they did on September 30th, 2025. In early October, Kash Patel piled on, announcing that the FBI would be severing its longstanding ties with the ADL. (I've seen little evidence for this actually happening, btw). He also announced an end to the FBI's partnership with the SPLC, another radical jewish organization that had been attacking Charlie and TPUSA. It was at that point that a most curious thing happened: on October 3rd, Marissa Streit, former member of IDF Unit 8200 & CEO of PragerU, attacked the ADL & SPLCโ€”which I clocked at time as being kosher theater. We should also note that according to Ben Shapiro, the Daily Wire shared space, talent and equipment with PragerU when both organizations were in their infancy. This will soon become more important in our story. Here's what I think was (allegedly) happening: the Conspirators were using the ADL and its adversarial relationship to TPUSA & Charlie Kirk to help cement the narrative that Charlie was murdered because of radical Leftist hate. That's why the ADL took down its "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." That's why Kash Patel publicly distanced the FBI from the ADL. And that's why fellow jewish intelligence operative Marissa Streit denounced it the ADL. But that's just one interpretation of the facts and I'm not accusing anyone specifically of a crime. Do your own research and make up your own mind. Right after that, on October 4th, 2025, Candace Owens found out that Kash Patel had flown in the agents from the FBI's Connecticut Office to "investigate" at UVU. That's the FBI office that shares building space with the ADL. At that point, I'd seen enough, and I started publicly airing my initially private hypothesis that the ADL was likely materially involved with Charlie's ass*ssination. But my tenuous alleged hypothesis was strengthened yesterday when we found out that Ben Shapiro was having a breakfast/lunch meeting with the Gary Javitchโ€”Former Executive Director of B'nai B'rith International & former president of the Henry Monsky Lodge of the B'nai B'rith & member of the ADLโ€”when Ben found out about the hit on Charlie almost right away. Within about 5 minutes or less, Ben's IDF security team was on the phone with someone in Charlie's SUV while it sped Charlie to the hospital. Mind-boggingly weird & dumbfounding. I'm not making any accusations of guilt, I want to be very clear about that. But this is a troubling set of facts and patterns that I believe looks like more than a coincidence. Why the heck would the security team of a long-time enemy to Charlie be on phone with Charlie's security team as it raced Charlie to the hospital? And while Shapiro just happened to be in a meeting with a high-level member of the ADL & the B'nai B'rith?! What. Are. The. Odds? And let's not forget that after months without any interaction, and knowing that Charlie saw Ben Shapiro as an adversary, Andrew Kolvet booked Shapiro as Charlie's guest the day before Charlie was assassinated. The same day Charlie proclaimed that he was leaving the pro-israel cause. The same day that Charlie likely had a Zoom struggle session with Rabbi Wolicki and Josh Hammer (who is a close friend of Ben Shapiro). The same day that Charlie texted multiple people the cryptic 'they're going to kill me.' And then within a week, Ben was hosting the Charlie Kirk Show and proclaiming he'd pick up the bloody mic? I'm sorry, but given all this context I've painstakingly recounted, am I the only one who thinks we deserve an explanation? WTF, Shapiro? โ–ช๏ธLike, retweet, reply, bookmarkโ–ช๏ธ

Sam Parker ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿงฏ

142,953 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 ay รถnce

$NWBO #๐——๐—–๐—ฉ๐—ฎ๐˜…-๐—Ÿ: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐˜€ A short, plain-language reading of the survival evidence for DCVax-L in #glioblastoma, and what it means under the MHRAgovuk guideline on external control arms. ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜: ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—จ๐—ก๐——, ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ DCVax-L more than doubled five-year survival, and the benefit is durability: a subset gets lasting disease control and simply stays alive. ๐Ÿ’‰ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ด ๐—ถ๐˜€ DCVax-L is a personalized cancer vaccine for glioblastoma, the deadliest form of brain cancer and a designated orphan disease. It is a living drug: its active ingredient is the patient's own immune cells, primed with proteins from that patient's surgically removed tumor, so the immune system learns to attack the cancer. Unlike a chemical drug that is metabolized and cleared, it switches on a living immune response that keeps working long after the injection. Glioblastoma comes back in almost everyone: even with the full standard of surgery, radiation, and temozolomide chemotherapy, most patients live under two years, and only about one in twenty reaches five. DCVax-L is given on top of that standard care, not in place of it: every patient in the trial received surgery, radiation, and temozolomide, and the vaccine was added to it, so the comparison measures what the vaccine adds. For two decades, nearly every new drug tried in this disease has failed. That is the backdrop against which any positive result must be judged. ๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ In a Phase 3 trial of 331 patients, those who received DCVax-L lived longer. At the median the gain looks modest, about three months (19.3 versus 16.5). The number that matters sits at the far end of the survival curve: more than twice as many vaccine patients were alive at five years, 13.0% versus 5.7%, and a few reached ten years in a disease that usually kills within three. In patients whose tumor had already returned, the effect was larger still, cutting the risk of death by about 42%. ๐Ÿ‘ฅ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ, ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ The benefit was not confined to the easy cases. Of the six prespecified subgroups the trial examined, every single one favored DCVax-L, and there was no group in which it did worse than standard care. The largest gains came in patients whose tumors carry MGMT methylation, who reached a median survival of 30.2 months from randomization against 21.3 for the controls. But even the hardest-to-treat patients, whose tumors lack that methylation, resist standard chemotherapy, and carry the worst prognosis in this disease, still came out ahead with the vaccine, at a hazard ratio of 0.93. A treatment that helps across the whole population, and helps most where the biology is most favorable, is acting like a real drug. ๐Ÿ“‰ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† That five-year number is the whole story, and the median buries it. Almost every treatment that ever helped in glioblastoma did the same modest thing: it slid the survival curve a few months to the right, then let it fall back. Doubling five-year survival is different in kind. A three-month gain at the median cannot, by itself, double the fraction alive at five years. The only shape that produces both numbers is a split: most patients get the small delay the median measures, while a subset gets durable disease control that lasts for years, well past where glioblastoma should have ended them. That subset is the long tail of the curve, and it is where the benefit lives. A median ignores extremes, the way a town's median income tells you nothing about its millionaires. The real story is not a longer delay; it is that a meaningful share of patients simply stay alive. ๐Ÿงฌ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ The tail is not luck. It is what this biology is built to produce. The vaccine carries proteins from the patient's own tumor, so it aims the immune system at whatever that tumor is made of, not a fixed short list of targets. And it amplifies: one trained immune cell drives many others that multiply into cancer-killers. Andres Salazar, the neurologist who developed poly-ICLC into the clinical adjuvant given with the vaccine, puts it in a line: you start the fire, and you keep it burning. A response like that does not produce a one-time bump. It builds and widens over time. What matters is not just that a response forms, but what kind. Dendritic cells are the immune system's master switch for that, the cells that set what kind of attack the body mounts, and this vaccine is built from them. It drives what immunologists call a type 1 polarized response: an interferon-driven, cytotoxic program aimed squarely at the tumor. That direction comes from the vaccine itself; the poly-ICLC adjuvant given with it drives the same interferon program and sustains it. That is the active ingredient, and it has been measured. In UCLA studies of this approach, the patients whose immune systems mounted the strongest interferon response lived the longest. The response also spreads. In a different cancer, a vaccine carried on this same poly-ICLC adjuvant drove more than 70% of a patient's cancer-killing T cells to target proteins that were never in the vaccine: the immune system outgrew its original targets and went after the rest of the tumor on its own. This is called epitope spreading, and it is not particular to one tumor; it is what this kind of response does, and it is the kind of response DCVax-L builds. That breadth is the likeliest thing separating the long-term survivors from everyone else, a response that breaks past its targets and clears the disease rather than one that stays caged and stops. There is even a tell in who benefits most: the effect is largest in tumors whose biology builds up more mutations under chemotherapy, and more mutations mean more targets for a whole-tumor vaccine to find. The same logic explains what the vaccine is not, and what it does not need. Checkpoint inhibitors, the drugs that release the immune system's brakes, have failed on their own in glioblastoma because there was no active response to release; the vaccine supplies that response first. That makes the vaccine the natural foundation for combination therapy. Combining it with its poly-ICLC adjuvant, made by Oncovir, has already shown meaningful survival gains in a published analysis. In the pivotal trial, the vaccine's proven benefit came added on top of standard chemotherapy and radiation; the newer question is how much the immune response can carry on its own. A UCLA trial is now testing that in patients whose tumors have returned, adding #Keytruda (pembrolizumab), the checkpoint antibody from $MRK, in a regimen built entirely around the immune response with no chemotherapy or radiation in it at all. Its interim survival curve shows the shape the biology predicts. In the arm given the vaccine and Keytruda together after surgery, the curve does not fall away but flattens into a plateau, with roughly 65% of patients still alive well past the point where recurrent glioblastoma kills nearly everyone. That plateau is the signature of a response that took hold and lasted, the type 1 attack forming durable immune memory so that once the disease is controlled it stays controlled. That is where this points, and where it is already arriving, a treatment that works through the response itself, one that could in time lean less on the harsh radiation and chemotherapy that have defined glioblastoma care and barely moved its survival. These are interim results, from Prins, Cloughesy, and Liau at UCLA. ๐Ÿ” ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข: ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ? The trial was randomized, an independent experiment shows the outside comparison is trustworthy, and every separate check points the same way. ๐Ÿค” ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ So much for what happened; the harder question is whether to believe it. The trial has the feature critics attacked: it could not keep a normal placebo group, because patients assigned to placebo were allowed, by design and by medical ethics, to switch to the vaccine once their cancer returned, and almost all did. That erased the internal comparison, so survival was measured against closely matched patients from other completed trials, an approach called an external control, which critics argued could tilt toward the vaccine. What the objection misses is where the randomization went. This was a randomized, blinded trial. The patients who got the vaccine were assigned to it at random, not hand-picked, so the treated group is an ordinary slice of the trial population, not a favorable one. The crossover removed the placebo group but never touched how patients were assigned. That leaves exactly one place for bias to enter, the outside comparison group, which is precisely what the next checks test. โœ… ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐˜† Before trusting a scale to weigh something unknown, you confirm it reads zero with nothing on it. That is what the calibration does, and it is the strongest part of the case. A separate, independent randomized trial called INSIGhT was run through the very same external-control method, and it gave two answers. First, three experimental drugs that had already failed were run through it, and it correctly found nothing (hazard ratios of 1.00, 0.93, and 0.88): the method does not manufacture a benefit where none exists. Second, INSIGhT's external controls were set head to head against its own randomized internal controls, and they were statistically indistinguishable. In this disease, an external control reproduces the answer a real randomized control would have given, and because that trial belonged to a different group, no one can say a sponsor graded its own work. The one place bias could enter, the control side, is the one place an independent randomized experiment certified as clean. There is a deeper fit worth naming, and it is what makes the two halves of this case one. The same instrument that reported those three failures as failures reads the vaccine as a success, and the biology says why: those drugs could not hold a tumor this varied, and the vaccine builds the broad, lasting response that finally does. One method, opposite readings, and one mechanism behind both. The statistics and the biology are not two arguments. They are the same argument seen twice. ๐Ÿƒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ? A natural worry is that the outside comparison was arranged after the fact to flatter the vaccine. The trial was built to prevent that. The patients to compare against, and the rules for matching them, were fixed in writing before anyone saw results, and an independent firm, not the company, chose the comparison trials against those rules. The trial also switched its main measure partway through, from delaying tumor growth to overall survival, but that was not a maneuver: immune treatments cause a harmless swelling that mimics tumor growth on scans and made the growth measure unreliable, and the switch was made while everyone was still blinded. Three further checks point the same way. Survival in this disease has not improved over the years the comparison spans, so same-era controls are sound. When the borrowed controls were tested directly, the comparison came out conservative rather than flattering. And the controls were counted from the same point in the disease as the vaccine patients, so neither side got a head start. Where the comparison can err, it errs against the drug. ๐Ÿ”ฌ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ The first comparison used whole groups. A sharper one became possible once patient-level records from three other trials could be obtained, pairing each vaccine patient with controls matched on the traits that drive survival in glioblastoma, above all MGMT methylation status, matched exactly, plus age, sex, extent of surgery, residual disease, and performance status. When the comparison got sharper, the benefit grew in every one of these analyses. The original cohort-level estimate was 2.8 months. Patient-level matching across the three trials put the gain between 3.4 and 6.3 months, and a method that weights patients rather than pairing them put it between 3.4 and 4.3, with several of the matched comparisons roughly doubling the original figure. The hazard ratio moved the same way, from 0.80 to between 0.69 and 0.77. The direction matters. A real effect blurred by crude matching gets clearer when the matching improves, while a biased one tends to shrink. It got stronger. ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† A fair question is how much hidden bias it would take to erase the result. Statisticians measure that with the E-value, and here a hidden factor would have to be about as strong as age is on survival, would also have to drive who received the vaccine, and would have to have escaped the decades of research that mapped every known risk factor in this disease. A second, independent check, Rosenbaum's Gamma, comes at it from the other side, asking how large an unseen imbalance between matched patients it would take to break the result, and it reaches the same verdict. Every factor strong enough to matter was already matched. A hidden one that clears that bar is not plausible. ๐Ÿ”’ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ The strongest point is not any single result. It is that a hidden bias big enough to explain the effect away would have to produce the same answer in every independent test at once: โ€ข The independent randomized calibration trial. โ€ข Three separate comparison trials, drawn from different studies. โ€ข Two different statistical methods that handle the data in different ways. โ€ข A separate pooled analysis of other dendritic-cell vaccine trials. โ€ข The internal math of the survival curve, which points to the same result (about 0.71 at five years) that the patient matching found. And it would have to fall in the exact direction the biology predicted before any data existed: a slow, widening benefit concentrated in long-term survivors. A single hidden factor that could forge all of that at once is not a hidden factor. It is a coincidence that does not happen. ๐Ÿฉบ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜: ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—œ๐—ง ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ The drug is nearly free of harm, the evidence fits an established and approved regulatory path, and what remains unrun changes nothing about the case. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜† Two things decide whether a real effect reaches patients: whether the drug is safe enough to use, and whether regulators will accept the evidence. The first is settled. Across 2,151 doses, only five serious side effects were even possibly related to the vaccine, with no autoimmunity and no cytokine storm. It is made once, in about eight days, then stored and given as a simple injection. When a treatment barely harms, the benefit needed to justify it falls, and the benefit here clears that lower bar easily. โณ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ A reasonable person asks why the sharper analysis appeared in 2026 and not in 2023. The answer is access, not choice. The patient-level analysis was written into the trial's plan from the start, to run if and when the data could be obtained. The company tried and could not get it in 2023, because the trials that held it had not released it; it became available later through a data-sharing repository, on the data owners' timeline, not the company's. The stronger analysis was always the plan. It was waiting on data that other parties control. ๐Ÿ”„ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ The vaccine helped not only newly diagnosed patients but also those whose tumor had already come back, and there the effect was the largest seen anywhere in the trial. In that group, median survival ran 13.2 months from recurrence against 7.8 for the controls. The separation opened immediately, with 90.6% of vaccine patients alive at six months against 64.0% of controls, and the lead held to the later marks, where survival more than doubled: 20.7% against 9.6% at two years, 11.1% against 5.1% at two and a half. These are the original cohort-level results, already published. The high-resolution patient-level matching that was applied to the newly diagnosed group has not yet been done here, for a practical reason: it needs patient records from other recurrent-cancer trials, held by a European research organization that shares them through its own formal request. Obtaining them is a routine next step, not an obstacle, and the newly diagnosed experience suggests the sharper analysis would only make the recurrent result stronger. The approval case rests on the newly diagnosed evidence, so nothing important depends on this step; it would simply sharpen a result that is already the strongest in the trial. ๐Ÿ›๏ธ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น Regulators do not treat an external control as a first choice, but the MHRA's guideline allows it in exactly this situation: a severe disease where a placebo trial is not ethical or feasible, and an effect large enough to interpret despite the design. The guideline even gives its own worked example of an acceptable external control, and it reads almost like a description of this trial: a rare disease, no ethical placebo, same-era standard-of-care controls, an objective survival endpoint, and an effect too large to blame on bias. DCVax-L fits on every count, and it was the first medicine ever to receive the MHRA's Promising Innovative Medicine designation, which asks essentially the same questions. The newly diagnosed case carries the decision on its own evidence, and regulators weigh that evidence against the disease it treats: in a cancer this lethal, with nothing better on offer, the question is whether the benefit is large, clear, and consistent enough to act on, and a benefit of this size, pointing the same way from every direction, is. ๐Ÿ“œ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ External controls are not a novelty invented for this drug. Over the past two decades they have factored into roughly forty-five drug approvals by the United States regulator, each granted under the conditions that apply here: a serious or rare disease, a placebo that would be unethical, and high unmet need. Regulators do not grant this lightly. They grant it when the disease is serious, its course is predictable and objectively measured, and the effect is large. Glioblastoma meets all three. The named cases cover every part of this disease's profile. Defibrotide, for a life-threatening transplant complication, was approved on a propensity-score comparison to a historical control, the same kind of method used here. Blinatumomab, for an aggressive relapsed leukemia, is the precedent for a fast-killing cancer, cleared by both the United States and European regulators. Cerliponase alfa is the precedent for a fatal brain disease, cleared by both agencies on treated patients versus a matched natural-history group. Glioblastoma is both at once, a fast-killing cancer of the brain, read by the same method, so no part of its profile lacks a close approved precedent. And on the one axis that governs how far an external-control result can be trusted, DCVax-L goes beyond all three. Each of those drugs was tested in a single-arm trial, with no randomization at all. DCVax-L began as a randomized trial and became an external-control comparison only when ethics consumed its placebo group. It sits in that tradition, and at the top of it. ๐ŸŽฏ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ This began as a randomized trial. Medical ethics forced it into an external-control comparison. Every independent way of checking it, on different data and different math, points the same direction, and the biology predicted that direction in advance. The first analysis did not overstate the vaccine's effect. Read with the right tools, it understated it.
6:16

$NWBO #๐——๐—–๐—ฉ๐—ฎ๐˜…-๐—Ÿ: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐˜€ A short, plain-language reading of the survival evidence for DCVax-L in #glioblastoma, and what it means under the MHRAgovuk guideline on external control arms. ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜: ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—จ๐—ก๐——, ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ DCVax-L more than doubled five-year survival, and the benefit is durability: a subset gets lasting disease control and simply stays alive. ๐Ÿ’‰ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ด ๐—ถ๐˜€ DCVax-L is a personalized cancer vaccine for glioblastoma, the deadliest form of brain cancer and a designated orphan disease. It is a living drug: its active ingredient is the patient's own immune cells, primed with proteins from that patient's surgically removed tumor, so the immune system learns to attack the cancer. Unlike a chemical drug that is metabolized and cleared, it switches on a living immune response that keeps working long after the injection. Glioblastoma comes back in almost everyone: even with the full standard of surgery, radiation, and temozolomide chemotherapy, most patients live under two years, and only about one in twenty reaches five. DCVax-L is given on top of that standard care, not in place of it: every patient in the trial received surgery, radiation, and temozolomide, and the vaccine was added to it, so the comparison measures what the vaccine adds. For two decades, nearly every new drug tried in this disease has failed. That is the backdrop against which any positive result must be judged. ๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ In a Phase 3 trial of 331 patients, those who received DCVax-L lived longer. At the median the gain looks modest, about three months (19.3 versus 16.5). The number that matters sits at the far end of the survival curve: more than twice as many vaccine patients were alive at five years, 13.0% versus 5.7%, and a few reached ten years in a disease that usually kills within three. In patients whose tumor had already returned, the effect was larger still, cutting the risk of death by about 42%. ๐Ÿ‘ฅ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ, ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ The benefit was not confined to the easy cases. Of the six prespecified subgroups the trial examined, every single one favored DCVax-L, and there was no group in which it did worse than standard care. The largest gains came in patients whose tumors carry MGMT methylation, who reached a median survival of 30.2 months from randomization against 21.3 for the controls. But even the hardest-to-treat patients, whose tumors lack that methylation, resist standard chemotherapy, and carry the worst prognosis in this disease, still came out ahead with the vaccine, at a hazard ratio of 0.93. A treatment that helps across the whole population, and helps most where the biology is most favorable, is acting like a real drug. ๐Ÿ“‰ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† That five-year number is the whole story, and the median buries it. Almost every treatment that ever helped in glioblastoma did the same modest thing: it slid the survival curve a few months to the right, then let it fall back. Doubling five-year survival is different in kind. A three-month gain at the median cannot, by itself, double the fraction alive at five years. The only shape that produces both numbers is a split: most patients get the small delay the median measures, while a subset gets durable disease control that lasts for years, well past where glioblastoma should have ended them. That subset is the long tail of the curve, and it is where the benefit lives. A median ignores extremes, the way a town's median income tells you nothing about its millionaires. The real story is not a longer delay; it is that a meaningful share of patients simply stay alive. ๐Ÿงฌ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ The tail is not luck. It is what this biology is built to produce. The vaccine carries proteins from the patient's own tumor, so it aims the immune system at whatever that tumor is made of, not a fixed short list of targets. And it amplifies: one trained immune cell drives many others that multiply into cancer-killers. Andres Salazar, the neurologist who developed poly-ICLC into the clinical adjuvant given with the vaccine, puts it in a line: you start the fire, and you keep it burning. A response like that does not produce a one-time bump. It builds and widens over time. What matters is not just that a response forms, but what kind. Dendritic cells are the immune system's master switch for that, the cells that set what kind of attack the body mounts, and this vaccine is built from them. It drives what immunologists call a type 1 polarized response: an interferon-driven, cytotoxic program aimed squarely at the tumor. That direction comes from the vaccine itself; the poly-ICLC adjuvant given with it drives the same interferon program and sustains it. That is the active ingredient, and it has been measured. In UCLA studies of this approach, the patients whose immune systems mounted the strongest interferon response lived the longest. The response also spreads. In a different cancer, a vaccine carried on this same poly-ICLC adjuvant drove more than 70% of a patient's cancer-killing T cells to target proteins that were never in the vaccine: the immune system outgrew its original targets and went after the rest of the tumor on its own. This is called epitope spreading, and it is not particular to one tumor; it is what this kind of response does, and it is the kind of response DCVax-L builds. That breadth is the likeliest thing separating the long-term survivors from everyone else, a response that breaks past its targets and clears the disease rather than one that stays caged and stops. There is even a tell in who benefits most: the effect is largest in tumors whose biology builds up more mutations under chemotherapy, and more mutations mean more targets for a whole-tumor vaccine to find. The same logic explains what the vaccine is not, and what it does not need. Checkpoint inhibitors, the drugs that release the immune system's brakes, have failed on their own in glioblastoma because there was no active response to release; the vaccine supplies that response first. That makes the vaccine the natural foundation for combination therapy. Combining it with its poly-ICLC adjuvant, made by Oncovir, has already shown meaningful survival gains in a published analysis. In the pivotal trial, the vaccine's proven benefit came added on top of standard chemotherapy and radiation; the newer question is how much the immune response can carry on its own. A UCLA trial is now testing that in patients whose tumors have returned, adding #Keytruda (pembrolizumab), the checkpoint antibody from $MRK, in a regimen built entirely around the immune response with no chemotherapy or radiation in it at all. Its interim survival curve shows the shape the biology predicts. In the arm given the vaccine and Keytruda together after surgery, the curve does not fall away but flattens into a plateau, with roughly 65% of patients still alive well past the point where recurrent glioblastoma kills nearly everyone. That plateau is the signature of a response that took hold and lasted, the type 1 attack forming durable immune memory so that once the disease is controlled it stays controlled. That is where this points, and where it is already arriving, a treatment that works through the response itself, one that could in time lean less on the harsh radiation and chemotherapy that have defined glioblastoma care and barely moved its survival. These are interim results, from Prins, Cloughesy, and Liau at UCLA. ๐Ÿ” ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข: ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ? The trial was randomized, an independent experiment shows the outside comparison is trustworthy, and every separate check points the same way. ๐Ÿค” ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ So much for what happened; the harder question is whether to believe it. The trial has the feature critics attacked: it could not keep a normal placebo group, because patients assigned to placebo were allowed, by design and by medical ethics, to switch to the vaccine once their cancer returned, and almost all did. That erased the internal comparison, so survival was measured against closely matched patients from other completed trials, an approach called an external control, which critics argued could tilt toward the vaccine. What the objection misses is where the randomization went. This was a randomized, blinded trial. The patients who got the vaccine were assigned to it at random, not hand-picked, so the treated group is an ordinary slice of the trial population, not a favorable one. The crossover removed the placebo group but never touched how patients were assigned. That leaves exactly one place for bias to enter, the outside comparison group, which is precisely what the next checks test. โœ… ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐˜† Before trusting a scale to weigh something unknown, you confirm it reads zero with nothing on it. That is what the calibration does, and it is the strongest part of the case. A separate, independent randomized trial called INSIGhT was run through the very same external-control method, and it gave two answers. First, three experimental drugs that had already failed were run through it, and it correctly found nothing (hazard ratios of 1.00, 0.93, and 0.88): the method does not manufacture a benefit where none exists. Second, INSIGhT's external controls were set head to head against its own randomized internal controls, and they were statistically indistinguishable. In this disease, an external control reproduces the answer a real randomized control would have given, and because that trial belonged to a different group, no one can say a sponsor graded its own work. The one place bias could enter, the control side, is the one place an independent randomized experiment certified as clean. There is a deeper fit worth naming, and it is what makes the two halves of this case one. The same instrument that reported those three failures as failures reads the vaccine as a success, and the biology says why: those drugs could not hold a tumor this varied, and the vaccine builds the broad, lasting response that finally does. One method, opposite readings, and one mechanism behind both. The statistics and the biology are not two arguments. They are the same argument seen twice. ๐Ÿƒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ? A natural worry is that the outside comparison was arranged after the fact to flatter the vaccine. The trial was built to prevent that. The patients to compare against, and the rules for matching them, were fixed in writing before anyone saw results, and an independent firm, not the company, chose the comparison trials against those rules. The trial also switched its main measure partway through, from delaying tumor growth to overall survival, but that was not a maneuver: immune treatments cause a harmless swelling that mimics tumor growth on scans and made the growth measure unreliable, and the switch was made while everyone was still blinded. Three further checks point the same way. Survival in this disease has not improved over the years the comparison spans, so same-era controls are sound. When the borrowed controls were tested directly, the comparison came out conservative rather than flattering. And the controls were counted from the same point in the disease as the vaccine patients, so neither side got a head start. Where the comparison can err, it errs against the drug. ๐Ÿ”ฌ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ The first comparison used whole groups. A sharper one became possible once patient-level records from three other trials could be obtained, pairing each vaccine patient with controls matched on the traits that drive survival in glioblastoma, above all MGMT methylation status, matched exactly, plus age, sex, extent of surgery, residual disease, and performance status. When the comparison got sharper, the benefit grew in every one of these analyses. The original cohort-level estimate was 2.8 months. Patient-level matching across the three trials put the gain between 3.4 and 6.3 months, and a method that weights patients rather than pairing them put it between 3.4 and 4.3, with several of the matched comparisons roughly doubling the original figure. The hazard ratio moved the same way, from 0.80 to between 0.69 and 0.77. The direction matters. A real effect blurred by crude matching gets clearer when the matching improves, while a biased one tends to shrink. It got stronger. ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† A fair question is how much hidden bias it would take to erase the result. Statisticians measure that with the E-value, and here a hidden factor would have to be about as strong as age is on survival, would also have to drive who received the vaccine, and would have to have escaped the decades of research that mapped every known risk factor in this disease. A second, independent check, Rosenbaum's Gamma, comes at it from the other side, asking how large an unseen imbalance between matched patients it would take to break the result, and it reaches the same verdict. Every factor strong enough to matter was already matched. A hidden one that clears that bar is not plausible. ๐Ÿ”’ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ The strongest point is not any single result. It is that a hidden bias big enough to explain the effect away would have to produce the same answer in every independent test at once: โ€ข The independent randomized calibration trial. โ€ข Three separate comparison trials, drawn from different studies. โ€ข Two different statistical methods that handle the data in different ways. โ€ข A separate pooled analysis of other dendritic-cell vaccine trials. โ€ข The internal math of the survival curve, which points to the same result (about 0.71 at five years) that the patient matching found. And it would have to fall in the exact direction the biology predicted before any data existed: a slow, widening benefit concentrated in long-term survivors. A single hidden factor that could forge all of that at once is not a hidden factor. It is a coincidence that does not happen. ๐Ÿฉบ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜: ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—œ๐—ง ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ The drug is nearly free of harm, the evidence fits an established and approved regulatory path, and what remains unrun changes nothing about the case. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜† Two things decide whether a real effect reaches patients: whether the drug is safe enough to use, and whether regulators will accept the evidence. The first is settled. Across 2,151 doses, only five serious side effects were even possibly related to the vaccine, with no autoimmunity and no cytokine storm. It is made once, in about eight days, then stored and given as a simple injection. When a treatment barely harms, the benefit needed to justify it falls, and the benefit here clears that lower bar easily. โณ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ A reasonable person asks why the sharper analysis appeared in 2026 and not in 2023. The answer is access, not choice. The patient-level analysis was written into the trial's plan from the start, to run if and when the data could be obtained. The company tried and could not get it in 2023, because the trials that held it had not released it; it became available later through a data-sharing repository, on the data owners' timeline, not the company's. The stronger analysis was always the plan. It was waiting on data that other parties control. ๐Ÿ”„ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ The vaccine helped not only newly diagnosed patients but also those whose tumor had already come back, and there the effect was the largest seen anywhere in the trial. In that group, median survival ran 13.2 months from recurrence against 7.8 for the controls. The separation opened immediately, with 90.6% of vaccine patients alive at six months against 64.0% of controls, and the lead held to the later marks, where survival more than doubled: 20.7% against 9.6% at two years, 11.1% against 5.1% at two and a half. These are the original cohort-level results, already published. The high-resolution patient-level matching that was applied to the newly diagnosed group has not yet been done here, for a practical reason: it needs patient records from other recurrent-cancer trials, held by a European research organization that shares them through its own formal request. Obtaining them is a routine next step, not an obstacle, and the newly diagnosed experience suggests the sharper analysis would only make the recurrent result stronger. The approval case rests on the newly diagnosed evidence, so nothing important depends on this step; it would simply sharpen a result that is already the strongest in the trial. ๐Ÿ›๏ธ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น Regulators do not treat an external control as a first choice, but the MHRA's guideline allows it in exactly this situation: a severe disease where a placebo trial is not ethical or feasible, and an effect large enough to interpret despite the design. The guideline even gives its own worked example of an acceptable external control, and it reads almost like a description of this trial: a rare disease, no ethical placebo, same-era standard-of-care controls, an objective survival endpoint, and an effect too large to blame on bias. DCVax-L fits on every count, and it was the first medicine ever to receive the MHRA's Promising Innovative Medicine designation, which asks essentially the same questions. The newly diagnosed case carries the decision on its own evidence, and regulators weigh that evidence against the disease it treats: in a cancer this lethal, with nothing better on offer, the question is whether the benefit is large, clear, and consistent enough to act on, and a benefit of this size, pointing the same way from every direction, is. ๐Ÿ“œ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ External controls are not a novelty invented for this drug. Over the past two decades they have factored into roughly forty-five drug approvals by the United States regulator, each granted under the conditions that apply here: a serious or rare disease, a placebo that would be unethical, and high unmet need. Regulators do not grant this lightly. They grant it when the disease is serious, its course is predictable and objectively measured, and the effect is large. Glioblastoma meets all three. The named cases cover every part of this disease's profile. Defibrotide, for a life-threatening transplant complication, was approved on a propensity-score comparison to a historical control, the same kind of method used here. Blinatumomab, for an aggressive relapsed leukemia, is the precedent for a fast-killing cancer, cleared by both the United States and European regulators. Cerliponase alfa is the precedent for a fatal brain disease, cleared by both agencies on treated patients versus a matched natural-history group. Glioblastoma is both at once, a fast-killing cancer of the brain, read by the same method, so no part of its profile lacks a close approved precedent. And on the one axis that governs how far an external-control result can be trusted, DCVax-L goes beyond all three. Each of those drugs was tested in a single-arm trial, with no randomization at all. DCVax-L began as a randomized trial and became an external-control comparison only when ethics consumed its placebo group. It sits in that tradition, and at the top of it. ๐ŸŽฏ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ This began as a randomized trial. Medical ethics forced it into an external-control comparison. Every independent way of checking it, on different data and different math, points the same direction, and the biology predicted that direction in advance. The first analysis did not overstate the vaccine's effect. Read with the right tools, it understated it.

Andrew Caravello, DO

11,406 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce