Kelly💚🌴's banner
Kelly💚🌴's profile picture

Kelly💚🌴

@kelly_steffee3,542 subscribers

Patriot, Advocate,True Crime Junkie, FKR, FTB, St. Jude momma of a superhero, brain cancer, nonverbal autistic, epilepsy, legally blind,severe scoliosis,

Shorts

I feel ever word of this! Jimmy

I feel ever word of this! Jimmy

16,845 görüntüleme

📌Remember when we were told there was Ring video proving Karen Read hit John O’Keefe? That evidence never materialized in court. Instead, jurors saw Ring footage from John’s driveway showing Karen leaving to search for him hours later. The prosecution did not produce Ring video showing Karen striking John at 34 Fairview. For a case that was supposed to be backed by overwhelming evidence, one of the most talked-about pieces of “proof” simply never appeared. Now we’re hearing from a witness, who was sequestered during the first Karen Read trial, that they say former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s reports contained statements they never made. According to those witnesses, they told ADA Adam Lally about the discrepancies. It was ignored. What’s even more striking? During opening statements, the Commonwealth told the jury they would hear from at least one of those witnesses… but that witness was never called. Why promise testimony to the jury, then never present it after being told the witness disputed what was attributed to them in an investigative report? The integrity of any investigation depends on accurate reports. If witnesses are now saying their statements were misrepresented, those allegations deserve scrutiny. Shari Thompson thank you for posting this video again.

📌Remember when we were told there was Ring video proving Karen Read hit John O’Keefe? That evidence never materialized in court. Instead, jurors saw Ring footage from John’s driveway showing Karen leaving to search for him hours later. The prosecution did not produce Ring video showing Karen striking John at 34 Fairview. For a case that was supposed to be backed by overwhelming evidence, one of the most talked-about pieces of “proof” simply never appeared. Now we’re hearing from a witness, who was sequestered during the first Karen Read trial, that they say former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s reports contained statements they never made. According to those witnesses, they told ADA Adam Lally about the discrepancies. It was ignored. What’s even more striking? During opening statements, the Commonwealth told the jury they would hear from at least one of those witnesses… but that witness was never called. Why promise testimony to the jury, then never present it after being told the witness disputed what was attributed to them in an investigative report? The integrity of any investigation depends on accurate reports. If witnesses are now saying their statements were misrepresented, those allegations deserve scrutiny. Shari Thompson thank you for posting this video again.

14,323 görüntüleme

Videos

kelly_steffee's profile picture

📌 COMMONWEALTH v LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL After the jury was dismissed today, the Commonwealth raised an issue about who has been signing in and out of the courthouse lockup to visit Lindsay, how often those visits are happening, and when they occurred. One person they specifically focused on was defense psychologist Dr. Paul Zeizel, who the Commonwealth believes has been visiting Lindsay frequently during the trial. Why does that matter? Because Dr. Zeizel may ultimately testify for the defense. The CW appears to be laying the groundwork to examine those visits and potentially question his ongoing contact with Lindsay, his role in the case, and his objectivity if he takes the stand. The Commonwealth also brought up a priest who has been visiting Lindsay. That immediately raised questions from Judge Sullivan about why the CW would need information about the priest. Kevin Reddington explained that the priest is Father Bob, someone close to Lindsay who baptized her children and has continued to visit her. And this is where Judge Sullivan drew a pretty clear line. He was not willing to simply turn over Father Bob’s visitation information because he has been visiting Lindsay. If the defense later decides to call Father Bob as a witness, the issue can be addressed at that point. Dr. Zeizel was treated differently. Judge Sullivan ruled that the Commonwealth can review the courthouse security records showing when and how often Dr. Zeizel has gone back into the lockup to see Lindsay during the trial. That distinction matters. This does NOT mean the Commonwealth gets access to what Lindsay and Dr. Zeizel discussed. It also does NOT mean anyone has established that Dr. Zeizel has done anything improper. Right now, they are getting information about the visits themselves. And I don’t think the timing is insignificant. Dr. Zeizel has already come up during testimony, including that strange theory about whether he told Lindsay to call Patrick and say she was hearing voices, a theory that the trooper ultimately acknowledged was speculation and apparently wasn’t actually investigated. Now the Commonwealth wants records documenting Dr. Zeizel’s contact with Lindsay while the trial itself is happening. To me, this looks like the CW is preparing for Dr. Zeizel before he ever takes the witness stand. And depending on what happens when the defense begins presenting its case, I have a feeling we haven’t heard the last of this issue.

Kelly💚🌴

21,419 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce