📌Remember when we were told there was Ring video... proving Karen Read hit John O’Keefe? That evidence never materialized in court. Instead, jurors saw Ring footage from John’s driveway showing Karen leaving to search for him hours later. The prosecution did not produce Ring video showing Karen striking John at 34 Fairview. For a case that was supposed to be backed by overwhelming evidence, one of the most talked-about pieces of “proof” simply never appeared. Now we’re hearing from a witness, who was sequestered during the first Karen Read trial, that they say former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s reports contained statements they never made. According to those witnesses, they told ADA Adam Lally about the discrepancies. It was ignored. What’s even more striking? During opening statements, the Commonwealth told the jury they would hear from at least one of those witnesses… but that witness was never called. Why promise testimony to the jury, then never present it after being told the witness disputed what was attributed to them in an investigative report? The integrity of any investigation depends on accurate reports. If witnesses are now saying their statements were misrepresented, those allegations deserve scrutiny. Shari Thompson thank you for posting this video again.show more

A grand jury concluded there was probable cause to... believe Karen Read murdered John O'Keefe. A grand juror, named Jessica Leslie, leaked information about witnesses and their statements from a grand jury proceeding. She was charged and got a sweetheart deal. But who did she leak the information to? Let's see where this all leads. The blogger has been charged with multiple felony counts of witness intimidation and harrassment in regard to his treatment of Read's trial witnesses. Wouldn't it be something if he ends up behind bars, while Read is on the outside looking in? He has been very testy lately. It is typical for the front men/puppets to serve the time. #KarenRead #Grandjuryleak Video clip credit: The Blogger and Jennifer Read was later aquitted of the most serious charges.show more

Trooper John Fanning, one of Michael Proctor’s supervisors at... the NCDAO State Police Detective Unit (SPDU), reportedly “supervised” the jury at the #KarenReadTrial. As if this conflict alone wasn’t concerning, the fact that Fanning was later under an inconclusive internal investigation by the MSP for “whether [he] failed to adequately supervise by not taking appropriate action after Trooper Proctor sent inappropriate texts to a group of subordinate members, specifically, if he took any corrective action to address the unprofessionalism and inappropriateness of Trooper Proctor's texts”—thereby making him a potential witness & demonstrating his clear conflict, is incredibly concerning. In the full sit down interview w/ #KarenRead & Attorney Alan Jackson, Ted Daniel asks them about the potential jury tampering that occurred at the first trial—notably with the ultra curious last minute dismissal of 3 jurors, whose body language, reactions/expressions & outward demeanor appeared favorable to the defense, in addition to the “supervision” of the jury by one of Michael Proctor’s bosses, NCDAO SPDU Trooper John Fanning. It would be dishonest to try to claim that Trooper Fanning had no stake in the outcome of the Karen Read trial. Arguably, anyone with ties to the NCDAO, its SPDU or the Canton Police Department—and notably those with close ties to Michael Proctor, like his own supervisor, have clear conflicts of interest in this case. As you may recall, Trooper John Fanning was the lead investigator in the Sandra Birchmore case where he and his investigators concluded that Birchmore committed suicide while allegedly pregnant with a fellow Police Officer, Matthew Farwell’s baby, and wasn’t the obvious victim of murder by that same Officer who also raped and groomed her from a young age as revealed by 30k+ text messages inexplicably “overlooked” by Trooper Nicholas Guarino & Fanning. The Feds investigated that “investigation” too and have since indicted Matthew Farwell in Sandra Birchmore‘s murder. Additionally, Trooper Fanning was in one of Michael Proctor’s abhorrent group text message threads where he disparaged Karen Read. Fanning was subsequently internally investigated by MSP for this, and his failure to properly “supervise” Trooper Proctor—interesting that such a person would be chosen to “supervise” the jury. In a statement from the State Police, they said: “The Department’s internal affairs investigation determined that there was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegation that Lieutenant Fanning violated rules and regulations by failing to uphold the responsibilities of a supervisory member. This allegation has been classified as unfounded.” Frankly, given the circumstances of this case, it would be concerning if any member of the State Police oversaw and supervised the jury. Why was ANY member of the State Police supervising the jury? Has anyone ever heard of this before—Police Officers from the same agency that investigated, testified against & was a part of the prosecution against a defendant having one of their personnel in charge of and in direct control of the jury? This can’t possibly be a standard practice due to the obvious existing conflict, no? Plus, were it standard protocol, then why wasn’t the defense made aware of this fact until 10 minutes before making closing argument, after a nearly 10 week long trial? ——— Something majorly stinks about this, and perhaps it sheds some light on something peculiar that one of the deliberating jurors, who was recently interviewed by Aidan Kearney, kept saying in regard to the jury’s deliberative process. Specifically, something that stood out to me from juror Ron’s interview was his repeated use and references of the other jurors’ use of the term “distractors” to qualify or describe the abundant evidence representing “reasonable doubt” brought out by the defense at trial. “Distractors.” It’s somewhat of a novel term, especially in this context, and is obviously antithetical to a jury’s duty to assess a case based on the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard, which is inherently intertwined with an assessment of the existence of, or lack thereof, reasonable doubt. There was no evidence or instructions from the court that came out at trial directing jurors to view defense evidence or ARCCA experts, for instance, as “distractors,” and the jury is very specifically instructed not to view/consume/bring any outside information into their deliberations. In other words, if they’re unsure who the ARCCA experts were there on behalf of (the Feds), they’re specifically told not to “fill in the blank” with information that’s not there, or evidence that didn’t come in at trial. So where did the information—this use of the term “distractors” come from? Who fed this term and this concept to the jury? The reason why it seems like it was “fed” to the jury is because it goes against everything the court, Judge Beverly Cannone, instructed them on. So, what prompted the whole “distractors” concept to taint the jurors’ minds and deliberations? ——— What immediately came to mind was the jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill in the Alex Murdaugh murder trial. In that case, according to Murdaugh’s attorneys, Ms. Hill “invented a story about a Facebook post to remove a juror she believed might not vote guilty”. Judge Clifton Newman, who oversaw the murder trial, removed the female juror from the panel. According to the Murdaugh defense motion, Ms. Hill had gone to Judge Newman – the day after Murdaugh testified, not long before closing arguments – claiming that she had seen a post in the local Facebook group ‘Walterboro Word of Mouth’ from the juror’s former husband, Tim Stone. The post purportedly claimed that the juror was drinking with her ex-husband and, when she became drunk, she expressed her views on whether Murdaugh was innocent or guilty. A follow-up post from an account called Timothy Stone apologised for the post saying that he was driven by “Satan”. Murdaugh’s attorneys claimed that the Mr. Stone behind the Facebook posts was actually a random Georgia man who was ranting about his wife’s aunt – and has no connection to the case. Additionally, information from jurors had come to the defense’s attention about inappropriate comments supposedly made to them by Ms. Hill while she was “supervising” them—the same role as “supervisor” that Trooper John Fanning allegedly played in the Karen Read trial. In Murdaugh’s case, the jurors were *actually* brought back into the court and were called to the stand one by one and questioned about potential comments that may have tainted their verdict. A female juror, identified only as juror Z, said that Ms. Hill had told some of the jurors to “watch [Murdaugh] closely.” “To me, it felt like ... she made it feel like he was already guilty,” juror Z said. A separate juror, Juror E, said that he heard Ms. Hill say “watch [Murdaugh’s] body language”, but claimed that this did not affect his decision. ——— There were reports, at the time of the dismissal of the 3 defense-favorable jurors at Karen Read’s trial, that right before closing arguments, Trooper Fanning had reported the information responsible for dismissing these jurors to Judge Cannone. Among that information was reportedly a story about one of those jurors, claiming they’d been overheard discussing the case while drinking at a bar (or something to that effect)—a story that sounded highly suspicious at the time, particularly given the fact that Trooper Fanning had allegedly had that information weeks before, but never reported it to the court. The similarity in Becky Hill and John Fanning’s “stories” leading to the dismissal of defense-favorable jurors is rather uncanny. ——— Is it not problematic to have individuals—with conflicts of interest, who are also potential witnesses, and who seemingly have a vested interest in the outcome of the trial—be in charge of overseeing and supervising the jury? I’ve attached the referenced MSP Internal Investigative Report for Trooper Fanning to this post (attached in the comments below). What’s troubling is that, despite acknowledging in their report that “these allegations came to light on June 10, 2024, during the trial,” they didn’t immediately initiate an internal investigation, but instead waited until AFTER the trial ended, July 3, 2024, to launch their internal investigation, almost as if they were planning on not initiating an investigation had Karen Read been convicted, because apparently in that case the misconduct would’ve been justified… or something? It should also be noted that this same practice was employed for most, if not all, of the other Police Officers in this case, whose misconduct was exposed by the defense throughout the prosecution’s case at trial—whereby, despite admissions and the existence of evidence of their misconduct, the MSP, NCDAO and Canton PD seemingly did everything they could to avoid initiating any investigations or holding their officers accountable for their misconduct until after the trial ended—when they could no longer justify not doing anything. It makes you wonder: Had Karen Read been convicted, do you think they’d (the MSP, NCDAO or CPD) ever launch any internal investigations into the misconduct of their officers, as evidenced at trial, weeks before? ——— It should be mentioned that in the Sandra Birchmore case, which Trooper Fanning led the investigation of, despite the Feds spoon feeding the State Police & NCDAO (DA Michael Morrissey’s Office) overwhelming evidence + probable cause, in addition to punting the ball back to the state to do the right thing and charge Farwell with murder—a state level charge, they’ve refused to take any action to this day. In fact, not only has it now been nearly 6 months since the Feds apprehended & indicted Farwell, but the NCDAO, Fanning and the State Police, aside from taking no action, have made no statements and are still of the official position that Sandra Birchmore killed herself. To try to save face, the NCDAO, through its former spokesperson David Traub, tried to create the impression that the DA’s Office had been long working in collaboration with the Feds to secure an arrest in the Sandra Birchmore case, claiming that “two of [the NCDAO SPDU’s] detectives were present at the command post ... while federal authorities were attempting to take Matthew Farwell into custody”—whatever that means. This, of course, is patently absurd because the DA’s Office and State Police could’ve “secured an arrest” years ago—nobody was stopping them, but instead they framed Sandra Birchmore for her own murder. Spokesperson Traub then had the gall to say that “much of the information that they [federal authorities] built on originated with our investigation, including the collection of thousands of text messages.” (See a collection of statements from the NCDAO on the Birchmore case from reporting over the years, attached in comments below). While the Feds might be somewhat playing along with this narrative, don’t be fooled. Perhaps it’s to appease the very individuals who they’re investigating for the supposed coverup of Sandra Birchmore’s murder. Why? If the Feds had actually been collaborating with the State Police investigators from the NCDAO who investigated Sandra’s death, then at the Feds’ press conference announcing Farewell’s indictment, U.S. Attorney (at the time) Joshua Levy wouldn’t have feigned ignorance when asked who the lead investigator was on the case before his agency got involved (see clip 3 attached). Had the Feds actually been *collaborating* with the State Police & the DA’s Office, John Fanning’s name would’ve been the first thing uttered out of Josh Levy’s mouth. On a side note: I think this is very telling. Does it mean the U.S. Attorney’s Office is investigating Fanning? Who knows. But one thing’s for sure: Josh Levy 100% knew who the State Police lead investigator was and he deliberately avoided saying it. This observation is reflected in FBI Special Agent Chenee Castruita’s 45-page long probable cause affidavit for the arrest of Matthew Farwell, which notably contains ZERO references whatsoever to John Fanning, or any of the other involved State Police investigators for that matter. That’s telling. If there was so much “collaboration,” like DA Michael Morrissey’s Office wants the public to think, then not only would USA Josh Levy have had, at the very least, Trooper Fanning up there side-by-side with him at that press conference, but he would’ve acknowledged him by name in his press conference. Why hasn’t the NCDAO charged disgraced former Stoughton cop Matthew Farwell with murder? Is it yet another case of “pinning it on the girl” to cover up for fellow Police Officers’ crimes? ——— Of note, Trooper Fanning grew up in Stoughton, graduating from Stoughton High School in 1998, the same year that Matthew and his twin brother William—who also grew up in Stoughton—then 12 years old, became participants in the Stoughton police youth program. As Karen Read points out in the interview with Ted Daniels: “There were familiarities among players that never should’ve happened. There’s a sleeve of homicide in the Norfolk DA’s office, as there is in the other counties of Massachusetts. And yet, the person assigned to investigate this case—ostensibly investigate this case—lives a mile down the street from the crime scene.” (See clip 4 attached). Why is it that when there’s seemingly crimes—in this case murders, involving cops, that the NCDAO SPDU appears to send the most conflicted Trooper with the closest ties to that cop/those cops? In Officer John O’Keefe’s murder, the Trooper that lives down the street from 34 Fairview and is “second family” with the Alberts is obviously the last person who should’ve ever responded to that case, yet he was the lead investigator. Given Trooper John Fanning’s close ties to Stoughton, isn’t it interesting that he’s the one who was the lead investigator of Sandra Birchmore‘s death—a murder that allegedly involved a former Stoughton cop? What say you?show more

You do not have to be an engineer or... have a complete understanding of what a reasonable degree of scientific certainty is to understand, that now, emphatically - Officer John O’Keefe was not struck by Karen Read’s Lexus with injuries that below his neck resulting in superficial abrasions to his elbow and a one inch abrasion on his knee. Anybody that says anything different doesn’t care about John O’Keefe or his family. It is indisputable, unarguable, proof that Karen Read did not hit him with her vehicle. The only option you have left - is that something happened inside 34 Fairview, and that some of those people know exactly what happened. As a result - McAlbert LE friends in the CPD and MSP helped coverup the murder of John O’Keefe to frame Karen Read.show more

For years now, we've listened to Karen Read's supporters... repeat the claim that Michael Proctor said, "pin it on the girl," treating it as some smoking gun of alleged corruption in the investigation despite there never being any evidence that Michael Proctor ever uttered those words. That phrase entered the conversation because Alan Jackson used it in court. From there, it was repeated so many times that people began treating it as an actual quote from law enforcement rather than what it really was: a phrase coined by Karen Read's own attorney. Now, thanks to Karen Read's civil team once again attempting to use "pin it on the girl" as evidence of supposed "corruption," we finally have clarity ON THE RECORD. Judge Gildea demanded that they identify the source of the quote because they had the audacity to include it in a filing without attributing it to anyone. When pressed to identify who actually said it, their answer wasn't Michael Proctor. It wasn't any member of the Massachusetts State Police. It wasn't anyone from Canton PD. IT WAS KAREN READ'S OWN DEFENSE COUNSEL as we've been saying all along. "Lies have momentum but the truth will always come to light." — Unknownshow more

I am both a journalist and an activist. After... I recorded my interview with Ronnie the Juror for the purposes of publishing a story in September 2024, I asked Ronnie if he would like to get in touch with Alan Jackson, since Ronnie told me that jurors dismissed ARCCA's testimony because they believed they were paid for by Karen Read's car insurance company. I thought this was information the defense could use to their advantage in the retrial, since the Crash Daddies were their most important witnesses. Ronnie spoke with them, and then right on cue during Dr. Wolfe's re-direct Alan Jackson asked him point blank: "You were not hired by an insurance company. That's not who hired you on behalf of Miss Read or anything like that?" Dr. Wolfe responded: "It was not an insurance company." When you see a story like the Karen Read trial it's not enough to just report the facts. In a battle of good vs. evil I will always assist the side of good in any way that I can.show more

Kerry Roberts complained about being a “victim” of “harassment”... for “the crime of telling the truth” yesterday on Good Morning America. Then she took the witness stand & admitted to lying under oath & committing perjury at a grand jury to protect Jen McCabe. The Feds are the ONLY reason we know this information. What does that tell you? These witnesses are comfortable lying under oath at the state grand jury because they know they’ve got immunity from DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. They’re protected. But suddenly, once under investigation by the Feds, and under the threat of federal perjury charges while on the witness stand at a federal grand jury, a whole lot of admissions and truth started coming out. This is also why Brian Higgins testified (at the federal grand jury) that he saw someone, that fit John O’Keefe’s criteria, enter the house. Higgins didn’t know what the Feds knew at the time, and being an ATF agent, he’s surely well aware of the fact that he could be facing prison time for lying to a federal agent. The only reason Kerry Roberts changed her testimony and told the truth—that she never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google anything—was because she knew she no longer had the protection of her friends at the federal grand jury. This is what the general public finds so outrageous about these “witnesses”. It’s how they brazenly lie to your face to frame an innocent woman for a murder she did not commit, and then if you dare call them on it, they have to make themselves “victims” by whining and crying about “hawassment” and “witness intimidation”. The public is going to be critical and unfavorable of you when you willingly lie to coverup and frame someone else for murder. That’s a necessary age-old aspect of society called “shame”. If you don’t like it, don’t lie or do shameful things. It’s really that simple. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefeshow more

March 2024 MSP asks Julie Albert what relationship she... had with John O’Keefe: “He was my neighbor” 2 months later in May 2024 Julie testifies in trial 1 and is asked the same question by Adam Lally: “We were friendly. We were neighbors. I’d see him all the time coming in and out of the street. We were friendly” The McAlberts somehow became better friends with John after they killed him. So weird. I genuinely hope they see John’s face every time they close their eyes for the rest of their pathetic lives. What a sick bunch. Also to the O’Keefe’s…. It’s time to wake the fuck up. Karen Read did not kill John. John was not hit, clipped or sideswiped by a vehicle.show more

The other day on Brother Counsel's debate with Dave... Aronberg we saw how dangerous it can be when clowns attain state sanctioned power. He didn't know any of the facts, didn't care about any of the expert testimony, and baselessly said that Karen Read was acquitted due to jury nullification. But what I thought was most ridiculous was when he said there was no probable cause to search Brian Albert's house, despite the fact that John O'Keefe was invited there and was found dead on Albert's lawn. I know how ridiculous that is because Brian Tully got a judge to sign a search warrant for my house, and the probable cause was that I did a YouTube show in my house, and supposedly there would be more witness intimidation inside the house, as if it's a bloody knife or DNA. If there was just a dead cop on my lawn they'd leave me alone. The police searched every inch of my house and took over 300 pictures. I want to show you all the witness intimidation they found:show more

Karen Read’s newest PR campaign of terror/Retooling: Ally McCabe... didn’t pick Colin up or drop him off, even though we have all seen the FBI-vetted texts showing that she did. The FBI also has Colin’s data and knows where he was. Full stop. According to Karen Read and her defense team Ally also traveled 12 miles in 154 seconds that night—that’s 280 mph. Does that sound plausible? Stop it, you lunatics. Funny how this suddenly became so important after the trial, considering Karen Read’s defense team never called Ally to testify in the 2025 murder trial. This is all a smear campaign designed to distract from the horrific witness intimidation, harassment, and defamation that Karen Read orchestrated and participated in, and to taint the jury in the O’Keefes’ wrongful death case against her. Defend the truth:show more

BREAKING: Trooper Nicholas Guarino just testified that #KarenRead’s cellphone... data showed that her phone connected to the WiFi at Officer #JohnOKeefe’s house at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am after she dropped John off at the after party at 34 Fairview Road. This is further evidence exonerating Karen Read given the Commonwealth’s theory states that she struck and killed Officer O’Keefe outside of 34 Fairview with her vehicle at 12:45am. The Commonwealth’s theory that Jen McCabe still saw Karen Read’s vehicle in front of 34 Fairview at 12:40 and 12:45am, as reflected by Jen’s text messages to John O’Keefe’s cellphone in which she’s acting like she still sees him/Karen’s car outside, is completely destroyed by Karen Read’s cellphone data, home WiFi network & router data, and Ring camera footage—all of which establish she was long gone from 34 Fairview by that time and had already arrived back home. Therefore, Karen Read did not and could not have killed Officer O’Keefe. Therefore, that’s further direct evidence of #JenMcCabe’s concerted efforts to fabricate a timeline, mislead investigators and ultimately frame Karen Read, similar to her attempt to blame her 2:27am incriminating Google search on Read. #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruptionshow more

#KarenRead might actually be the closest thing I've seen... to an evil genius...though YCT Rule Number 7 has always been "There are no evil geniuses". Damn, does she come close though. But more baffling to me is the number of people who were so willing to be duped. But, then, that's where the root of "conman" comes from. The 'con' means 'confidence'. The swindle works by winning someone's confidence, and the dirty secret is that people are vulnerable when they WANT to believe. PT Barnum said "There's a sucker born every minute". Karen has directly...and closely...managed a spider web of social media through minions such as Sean McDonough, Olivia, Turtleboy, the Glarer...many more. She distributes lies through them the way Putin sends out Iranian drones to hit the Ukranian power grid. I'm not speculating. I've watched it work the last year, and once fell victim to it myself. Karen's lies, not the Iranian drones, of course. But when do those she has conned stop and take stock of all the things they've believed and proved to be misinformation spread by one woman? The Feds did not stop the trial or charge any conspirators. That trick is like Charlie Brown and the football. No one in FKR seems to learn, however. "Evah!" The defense promised evidence of a framing, a premeditated attack on John, a cover up, a conspiracy the likes of which this region has never seen. Literally none of that proved true. Not one iota of evidence. Her Legion of the Duped was told about missing belts, missing hats and shoes, geofence data that showed John in the house, witnesses to nefarious events inside the sallyport, witnesses that flipped, misplaced commas that proved a 20-year honor student was in on it, a drug deal filmed, feuds with neighbors, laundered clothing, evidence stored for 6 weeks in the back of Proctor's SUV...on and on and on. The evidence against Karen is bulletproof, but was poorly presented, so the jury's conclusion is not surprising. However, literally no evidence emerged to prove wrongdoing on the part of investigators. No conspiracy. There's as much evidence the Reptilians killed John as there is the "McAlberts". Yet no one within the moribund legion questions ANY OF IT. Like Stepford Wives, they walk around with blank stares, continuing the say things that are proved false within an hour. Such as the notion that the state will not try her again. The idea that ordinary people beat up a friend, entirely without motive, and for some reason thought it made sense to wait a few hours, then drag him, alive, onto the THEIR OWN LAWN in order to die in the cold...remains absurd. I have to believe that some day most members of the horde will look back and wonder why they believed such weirdness. Many will deny they did, just like in the years following the Salem Witch Trials no one admitted to turning against their neighbors for their own petty reasons, and no one admitted succumbing to superstition. In the Karen Read case, a couple of years from now, if a visiting relative at Thanksgiving brings it up, they'll ask: "Did people really believe those in the house would actually drag someone onto their own lawn to die like that?" And former members of the Horde will reply: "I never fell for it myself."show more

Peter from Lawyer You Know points out interesting language... from each of The House Defendant’s MTD reply… The McAlberts and Higgins all state they were at the Waterfall Bar socializing with “friends and family” They all state that John O’Keefe and Karen Read just “showed up” towards the end of the night and started socializing with “their friends and family” Seems like they are forgetting that one of their family members INVITED John O’Keefe to the Waterfall- 👇🏼 CHRIS ALBERT texted John O’Keefe at 9:45pm saying: “Get over here. If not I’ll fuck up your lawn” Equally as interesting… Didn’t Jen McCabe say her and John O’Keefe were very close friends and that she “loved him” while testifying in both criminal trials? Now she’s trying to distance herself- as if Karen Read and John O’Keefe were just random strangers who showed up at the bar and inserted themselves into their night. ~3 hours after that text from Chris to John, John is never heard from again, after being invited to and dropped off at Chris’s brothers house. How ironic… #KarenRead #JohnOkeefe Damon M. Seligson Esq.show more