Terri Green
@TerriGreenUSA • 28,689 subscribers
Romans 1:18-32 | Army Brat | Granddaughter of an Honorary Blue Angel | Truth will always sound like hate to those who hate the truth | Soli Deo Gloria!
Shorts
Videos
In 2004 John MacArthur was on Larry King Live with Dennis Prager. The topic was: “Who Was Jesus.” And the subject comes up about “who killed Jesus.” John MacArthur addresses the fact that no true Christian is going to be an antisemite. Jmac says: “no true Christian transformed on the inside by faith in Jesus Christ is going to be an antisemite. What you have is people who called themselves Christians, but who have not been transformed by the power of Christ. They’re the ones that would be antisemitic. If you’re a Christian you’ll be converted from your racism.”
Terri Green178,631 views • 19 days ago
The look on Wes Huff’s face as he listens to Sadie Robertson say she preaches. For any man claiming to know the Scriptures, you cannot deny the Bible says a woman is not allowed to preach over men. Wes never corrects her interpretation of the scriptures. In 1 Timothy 2:12, Paul restricts/forbids women from teaching or exercising authority over men in a church setting. Sadie Robertson tells women at the IF gathering that she was called to preach. She also practices the Enneagram.
Terri Green610,756 views • 3 months ago
“It's very unfortunate that abortion is such a big issue for everybody" — Dave Rubin Rubin used 18 embryos to have a baby. He destroyed life, rented a womb to design a baby for he and his husband. He’s not pro-life. Why is he platformed by the Daily Wire, Fox News and the Blaze?
Terri Green453,806 views • 3 months ago
John Crist of all people, asked Sadie Huff what her thoughts were on women preaching. Sadie gives a nuanced answer by saying after Jesus encountered women He told them to go out and tell. She doesn’t have any scripture to back up her beliefs. She imposes an opinion that isn’t based on the truth in the Bible that prohibits women preaching.
Terri Green150,561 views • 1 month ago
“A true believer will not fail to love the Lord. He may not love the Lord as he should, but he will not fail to love the Lord. A true believer will not fail to love others. He may not love others as he should, but he will not fail to love others. What about that person who professes to be a Christian turns away, walks away, denies Christ, denies the gospel, shows no love for the Lord—no love for the believers, no love for the church—no love for the word of God? The Bible clearly explains that in 1 John 2:19, “they went out from us because they never were of us. If they had been of us, they would’ve continued with us, but they went out from us that it might be made manifest.” They never were of us.” — John MacArthur
Terri Green19,759 views • 6 days ago
Sadie Robertson Huff talks with John Crist. She addresses why she preaches. She talks about what 1 Timothy 2:12 says, but then defends her position that she’s is called to preach. Sadie says she’s going to preach when the Lord leads her. But the Lord doesn’t lead her to go against what the Scriptures teach on women speaking or preaching to a gathered body of believers in a church.
Terri Green54,646 views • 27 days ago
This is Kirk Cameron’s son, James. They’re espousing Annihilationism. That is the theological view that the unrighteous will ultimately cease to exist after a final judgment, rather than suffer eternal conscious torment. It is often supported by interpretations of biblical texts, with adherents arguing that "eternal" punishment refers to the lasting effect of the punishment, and that "death" means a final end rather than unending suffering. Some Christian denominations, such as the Seventh-day Adventists and Christadelphians, hold this belief. Isaiah 66:22-24 Revelation 14:11 Matthew 25:31-46 Mark 9:42-48 Daniel 12:1-2 2 Thessalonians 1:5-10
Terri Green338,833 views • 7 months ago
It doesn’t get any worse than this. Brandon Lake and Steven Furtick. This is all for the show of it.
Terri Green114,510 views • 2 months ago
Unbelievable. Paula White is in charge. She says because of Jesus’s resurrection, Trump rose up too. She asks people to stretch their hands towards the President. She says to Trump: “You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us. You will be victorious in all you put your hand to because God is using you!”
Terri Green140,072 views • 3 months ago
“When women take over a culture, men become weak. When men become weak, they can be conquered. They can be conquered. You’re watching that happen in this country. As more and more and more and more women ascend to power, more and more men become weaker and weaker and weaker, and the level of vulnerability just keeps escalating.” — John MacArthur
Terri Green53,008 views • 1 month ago
Extraordinary testimony! Mitsuo Fuchida, the Imperial Japanese Navy captain who led the 1941 Pearl Harbor attack, converted to Christianity in 1950 following a profound change of heart. Initially bitter after the war, Fuchida was deeply moved by the story of Peggy Covell, whose missionary parents were executed by Japanese forces, yet she chose to show love to Japanese prisoners of war rather than seeking revenge. This sparked Fuchida’s interest in Christianity. He soon encountered the testimony of Jacob DeShazer, an American POW who shared his story of finding God in a Japanese camp in I Was a Prisoner of Japan (1950). In September 1949, Fuchida became a Christian. “Looking back,” he said later, “I can see now that the Lord had laid his hand upon me so that I might serve him.”
Terri Green125,022 views • 3 months ago
This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.
Terri Green132,088 views • 4 months ago
![At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2075660060995260826/amplify_video_thumb/2075659984059146240/img/-AJFtTo2QCRyxERK.jpg)
At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?
Terri Green12,152 views • 9 days ago