Weird Old World's banner
Weird Old World's profile picture

Weird Old World

@Weird_Old_World18,530 subscribers

Lesser-known ancient sites that make you go WOW!

Shorts

Day 4 of excavating the Sacsayhuaman walls. If you guessed that it was going deeper, you were right. What seems to be another layer of blocks starts to appear! 🧵 1/3

Day 4 of excavating the Sacsayhuaman walls. If you guessed that it was going deeper, you were right. What seems to be another layer of blocks starts to appear! 🧵 1/3

672,448 views

Day 3 of excavating the Sacsayhuaman wall. About 60cm deep. How much deeper do you think this wall go? Place your bets. 1/3. Check the other excavations below.

Day 3 of excavating the Sacsayhuaman wall. About 60cm deep. How much deeper do you think this wall go? Place your bets. 1/3. Check the other excavations below.

272,573 views

🚨Exciting news for archaeology and for human knowledge in general! It has been a long and tedious process, but the Peruvian Ministry of Culture has finally granted permission to export geological samples that will hopefully enable the age of Sacsayhuaman's construction to be determined! Three types of samples have been collected for analysis using different dating methods, and some of them are already on their way to different labs in the US and in Europe. 1 - Soil samples collected from right beneath the blocks that make up the megalithic walls of Sacsayhuaman for Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating – this method is used to determine the time elapsed since minerals like quartz and feldspar were last exposed to sunlight by measuring the light energy (luminescence) released from trapped electrons that accumulated in the mineral crystal lattice due to natural radiation since their last bleaching/reset event (i.e., when the ground was covered by the blocks). 2 - Limestone samples from megalithic blocks, quarry sites and carved bedrock, for Cosmogenic Nuclides dating – this method is used to determine the age of geological surfaces by measuring the accumulation of rare isotopes (mainly ³⁶Cl) produced when the limestone is hit by cosmic rays. 3 - Speleothems samples (calcium carbonate deposits such as stalactite or flowstone) collected on carved surfaces for Uranium-Thorium dating – this method is used to calculate the age of carbonate materials by measuring the buildup of thorium-230 from the slow decay of its uranium-234 parent isotope. This won’t give us the age of the carving of these rocks, but this will give us a minimum age, since the rock was obviously cut before these deposits formed. Additionally, if some organic material is found in the soil or speleothems samples, radiocarbon dating will also be performed, which would give us a fourth means of dating the construction of the site. Whether you believe this megalithic site was built by the Incas or by a much older civilization, science will hopefully put an end to this debate once and for all. And, to top it all off, some limestone samples have also been sent to the Geopolymer Institute of Joseph Davidovits for analysis. This is proof, if any were needed, that not all archaeologists are dogmatic and closed to alternative theories. Now, Let's hope that all these methods will yield results. Whatever these results may be, they will be the subject of a scientific publication, and I will share them here on X, so make sure to follow. This could potentially rewrite history!

🚨Exciting news for archaeology and for human knowledge in general! It has been a long and tedious process, but the Peruvian Ministry of Culture has finally granted permission to export geological samples that will hopefully enable the age of Sacsayhuaman's construction to be determined! Three types of samples have been collected for analysis using different dating methods, and some of them are already on their way to different labs in the US and in Europe. 1 - Soil samples collected from right beneath the blocks that make up the megalithic walls of Sacsayhuaman for Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating – this method is used to determine the time elapsed since minerals like quartz and feldspar were last exposed to sunlight by measuring the light energy (luminescence) released from trapped electrons that accumulated in the mineral crystal lattice due to natural radiation since their last bleaching/reset event (i.e., when the ground was covered by the blocks). 2 - Limestone samples from megalithic blocks, quarry sites and carved bedrock, for Cosmogenic Nuclides dating – this method is used to determine the age of geological surfaces by measuring the accumulation of rare isotopes (mainly ³⁶Cl) produced when the limestone is hit by cosmic rays. 3 - Speleothems samples (calcium carbonate deposits such as stalactite or flowstone) collected on carved surfaces for Uranium-Thorium dating – this method is used to calculate the age of carbonate materials by measuring the buildup of thorium-230 from the slow decay of its uranium-234 parent isotope. This won’t give us the age of the carving of these rocks, but this will give us a minimum age, since the rock was obviously cut before these deposits formed. Additionally, if some organic material is found in the soil or speleothems samples, radiocarbon dating will also be performed, which would give us a fourth means of dating the construction of the site. Whether you believe this megalithic site was built by the Incas or by a much older civilization, science will hopefully put an end to this debate once and for all. And, to top it all off, some limestone samples have also been sent to the Geopolymer Institute of Joseph Davidovits for analysis. This is proof, if any were needed, that not all archaeologists are dogmatic and closed to alternative theories. Now, Let's hope that all these methods will yield results. Whatever these results may be, they will be the subject of a scientific publication, and I will share them here on X, so make sure to follow. This could potentially rewrite history!

113,042 views

Update on the excavation of the Sacsayhuaman wall on day 2. Before you comment that they haven't made much progress, you should know that archaeological digs are slow for a reason, and that no, you cannot use a backhoe. I get the frustration, but patience is a virtue.

Update on the excavation of the Sacsayhuaman wall on day 2. Before you comment that they haven't made much progress, you should know that archaeological digs are slow for a reason, and that no, you cannot use a backhoe. I get the frustration, but patience is a virtue.

170,180 views

Day 5 of "How deep do the Sacsayhuaman walls go?" Current depth: about 100cm (video shot at midday). The stones of the 3rd pit are coming out tomorrow. 🧵1/3

Day 5 of "How deep do the Sacsayhuaman walls go?" Current depth: about 100cm (video shot at midday). The stones of the 3rd pit are coming out tomorrow. 🧵1/3

130,493 views

🚨BREAKING NEWS, WE'RE BREAKING GROUND!🚨 Today is a day to remember for Peruvian archaeology! The excavations of the chincanas have officially started in Sacsayhuaman. Three 2x2m squares are being dug simultaneously above the main section of the chincana that goes under the iconic megalithic walls. I'll see if I can live stream on Youtube in a few days when things get really interesting (i.e. when the roof of the chincana comes into view). Stay tuned!

🚨BREAKING NEWS, WE'RE BREAKING GROUND!🚨 Today is a day to remember for Peruvian archaeology! The excavations of the chincanas have officially started in Sacsayhuaman. Three 2x2m squares are being dug simultaneously above the main section of the chincana that goes under the iconic megalithic walls. I'll see if I can live stream on Youtube in a few days when things get really interesting (i.e. when the roof of the chincana comes into view). Stay tuned!

44,102 views

Videos