OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit. To develop AI... safely for all of humanity. Sam Altman said AI jobs apocalypse probably won’t happen. Sam Altman also said AI will replace most white collar jobs. Now Sam Altman says people will buy intelligence from him on a meter. Like electricity. Like water. If you can’t afford your electricity bill the lights go out. If you can’t afford your intelligence bill. He didn’t finish that sentence. OpenAI is facing a $14 billion loss this year. He announced this at a BlackRock infrastructure summit. In front of investors. Who are on his board. The nonprofit that was going to give intelligence to humanity. Wants to meter it and collect the bill.show more

🚨BIG BREAKING: The New Yorker just published what might... end Sam Altman's career.. 70 pages of secret memos.. 200 pages of private notes.. And the word that keeps coming up.. "Sociopath".. Let's start from the beginning.. Elon Musk helped create OpenAI.. He personally recruited the top scientists.. Offered to cover any funding shortfalls out of his own pocket.. Pushed for a billion dollar commitment.. All because he wanted to stop Google from monopolizing AI.. The whole point was to keep AI open.. Safe.. For everyone.. A nonprofit with a legally binding duty to prioritize humanity over profit.. Then Sam Altman took over.. At his first startup Loopt.. Senior employees asked the board to fire him as CEO.. Twice.. One colleague said there was a "blurring" between what Altman claimed to have accomplished and what was real.. In its "most toxic form," he said, that kind of thinking "leads to Theranos".. At Y Combinator.. His own partners pushed him out over mistrust.. Paul Graham privately told colleagues "Sam had been lying to us all the time".. Investors said Altman was known to "make personal investments, selectively, into the best companies, blocking outside investors".. One called it "a policy of Sam first".. Then OpenAI.. His own co-founder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever compiled secret memos.. 70 pages of Slack messages, HR documents, and evidence.. Sent to board members as disappearing messages because he was "terrified" Altman would "find a way to make them disappear".. One memo begins with a list headed "Sam exhibits a consistent pattern of..." The first item.. "Lying".. Dario Amodei, OpenAI's former safety lead, kept over 200 pages of private notes during his time at the company.. His conclusion.. "The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself".. The board fired him.. They said he "was not consistently candid in his communications".. A board member told the New Yorker.. "He's unconstrained by truth".. Another board member.. Unprompted.. Used the word "sociopathic".. Saying Altman has "a strong desire to please people" combined with "almost a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences that may come from deceiving someone".. Aaron Swartz.. The legendary coder who co-created RSS and Reddit.. Told friends before his death.. "You need to understand that Sam can never be trusted.. He is a sociopath.. He would do anything".. A senior Microsoft executive said.. "I think there's a small but real chance he's eventually remembered as a Bernie Madoff or Sam Bankman-Fried level scammer".. He got himself reinstated in five days.. By weaponizing Microsoft's $13 billion investment.. Coordinating directly with Satya Nadella over text.. Then purged every board member who voted against him.. No written report was ever produced from the investigation into his conduct.. The findings were limited to oral briefings.. Because putting them in writing might create liability.. Now there's nobody left to say no.. OpenAI publicly promised 20% of their computing power to a "superalignment team" researching how to prevent AI from causing "the disempowerment of humanity or even human extinction".. The actual allocation.. 1 to 2%.. On the company's oldest hardware with the worst chips.. The team was dissolved without completing its mission.. When the New Yorker asked to interview researchers working on existential safety.. An OpenAI rep seemed confused.. "What do you mean by existential safety?".. "That's not, like, a thing".. Altman himself told the reporters.. "My vibes don't match a lot of the traditional AI-safety stuff".. Vibes.. He's managing existential risk with vibes.. Meanwhile Musk backed an open letter urging a six-month pause on training super-powerful AI.. Asking the industry to slow down.. Then founded xAI with a mission to build truth-seeking intelligence.. Altman ignored the pause.. And accelerated.. He secretly lobbied against the very AI regulations he publicly championed in Congress.. OpenAI opposed a California safety bill while privately issuing threats.. A legislative aide said "we saw increasingly cunning, deceptive behavior from OpenAI".. He pitched selling AI technology to foreign governments.. Including a plan where nations would compete in a bidding war for access.. A junior researcher recalled thinking "This is completely fucking insane".. He visited Sheikh Tahnoon.. The UAE's spymaster who controls $1.5 trillion in sovereign wealth.. On his $250 million superyacht.. Later called him a "dear personal friend" on X.. After the Khashoggi murder.. His policy director told him "Sam, you cannot be on this board".. Instead of walking away.. Altman asked if he could still somehow get money from the Saudis.. "The question was not 'Is this a bad thing?'" a consultant recalled.. "But 'Can I get away with it?'".. Then Anthropic refused to let the Pentagon use their AI for mass surveillance and autonomous weapons.. They got blacklisted.. Hours later.. Altman signed a deal to replace them.. When employees raised concerns at a staff meeting he said.. "You don't get to weigh in on that".. OpenAI now faces seven wrongful death lawsuits.. Chat logs in one case show ChatGPT encouraged a man's paranoid delusion that his mother was trying to poison him.. He fatally beat and strangled her.. The Future of Life Institute grades every major AI company on existential safety.. OpenAI got an F.. Elon Musk helped build OpenAI to protect humanity from an AI monopoly.. Sam Altman turned it into one.. A man whose own co-founder compiled 70 pages documenting his lying.. Whose colleagues called him "unconstrained by truth".. Who gutted the safety team meant to protect humanity.. Who lobbied against the regulations he publicly supported.. Who chased autocrat money weeks after a journalist was dismembered.. And when the board tried to stop him.. He told them.. "I can't change my personality." A board member's interpretation.. "What it meant was 'I have this trait where I lie to people, and I'm not going to stop.'"show more

JUDGE TO MUSK: PEOPLE DON'T WANT THE FUTURE OF... HUMANITY IN YOUR HANDS EITHER Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers cut through three days of AI doomsday testimony in the Musk v. Altman trial with a line aimed straight at Musk: "I suspect there are plenty of people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands." The judge flagged the irony that Musk is suing OpenAI for straying from its nonprofit AI safety mission while running xAI, "a company in the exact same space," and ordered both sides to drop the existential AI risk framing. "The question here is about whether there was a breach of charitable trust. This is not a trial on the safety risks of artificial intelligence." The bench order came as Musk wrapped two hours of cross-examination. He named Microsoft's $10 billion investment as the moment he believed Altman and Brockman were trying to "steal the charity," and called Altman's leadership a betrayal of OpenAI's nonprofit founding mission. OpenAI's lead counsel William Savitt opened with: "We are here because Mr. Musk didn't get his way." Defense argues Musk demanded majority equity, walked when refused, then sued after launching xAI as a competitor. Musk seeks reversion to nonprofit status, removal of Altman and Brockman from the board, and roughly $130 billion in damages. Trial resumes Monday with Jared Birchall, then Greg Brockman expected next. Altman testifies later.show more

Sam Altman explains biology's intelligence bottleneck: understanding a discovery... is far easier than making one "We are not that smart and biology is enormously complex." "We can imagine kind of anything." "We can have someone explain enormously complex things to us and then we can get it." "But to discover these things requires a lot of brain power." That is the hidden health AI bet. The breakthrough is not another chatbot that can summarize known medicine. It is enough machine intelligence to search biology's enormous possibility space for discoveries humans have not made. Medicine has no shortage of explanations. It has a discovery bottleneck. If models can supply the missing brain power, the highest-value output will not be answers. It will be new biological knowledge. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, on CNNshow more

OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman said Wednesday "there could be"... other systems hacked by its AI agent after the company revealed last week that its technology carried out a hack of another AI company in what OpenAI called an "unprecedented cyber incident." When asked whether he's spoken to the Trump administration about slowing down AI development, Altman said, "We've talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which I think is in everyone's interest." Altman met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill Wednesday to preview his company's newest AI model.show more

SAM ALTMAN LAST YEAR ON HIS OPENAI STAKE: “I... make no money from OpenAI. I’m doing this because I love it.” Dude. Whenever someone says they aren’t “doing it for the money,” just realize…100% of the time…they are lying to you. Every single person on this planet is greedy beyond imagination. People can do things authentically and in a way that they believe truly is ethical but ANYONE who is doing something ambitious (and rightly so) has a plan to eventually make money. MONEY MAKES THE WORLD SPIN. There are ethical and unethical ways to make it, but every single person wants more of it. Sam Altman is now worth $10.5B, becoming the 250th richest person overnight, if his reported stake of 7% in OpenAI becomes actualized.show more

Ronan Farrow just did to Sam Altman what he... did to Harvey Weinstein... The New Yorker dropped an 18-month investigation this morning based on 100+ interviews and a stack of internal documents that were never supposed to leave OpenAI. Ilya's secret memos, Dario Amodei's private journal. Board communications, the full picture of who Sam Altman is when the cameras are off. And the pattern starts way before OpenAI. At his first startup Loopt, senior employees went to the board and asked them to fire Sam as CEO. This happened twice, over concerns about leadership and transparency. He left, joined Y Combinator, and the same thing played out. Partners complained to Paul Graham about Sam's behavior. Graham's private take to colleagues: Sam had been lying to us all the time. Nobody removed him, he kept getting promoted. Eventually he landed the CEO seat at what is now the most consequential AI company in the world. Inside OpenAI, Ilya Sutskever spent months compiling evidence: 70 pages of Slack messages, HR documents, and photos taken on personal phones because employees knew company devices were being monitored. He sent everything to the board as disappearing messages so Sam couldn't make it go away. The very first line of his memo lists Sam's core pattern, and the first word on that list is: Lying Dario Amodei saw the same thing and handled it differently. He kept a private journal for years, over 200 pages, titled "My Experience with OpenAI" with a subheading that said "Private: Do Not Share" After all those pages, his conclusion was one sentence: the problem with OpenAI is Sam himself. He eventually left and built Anthropic. 2 of the smartest people in AI independently reached the same verdict. Neither could stop what was happening. The superalignment team, the group responsible for making sure AI doesn't go off the rails, was promised 20% of OpenAI's compute. 4 people who worked on or with the team told The New Yorker the real number was 1-2%, running on the oldest cluster with the worst hardware. The team got dissolved before finishing its work. Safety was a talking point, not a priority. Sam told the board that a safety panel had approved controversial features in GPT-4. When board member Helen Toner asked for the documentation, it turned out the most sensitive features had never been approved at all. Separately, Microsoft released an early version of ChatGPT in India without completing a required safety review and Sam never mentioned it to the board. When the board finally fired him in November 2023, he texted Satya Nadella directly with his own replacement board lineup. Thrive Capital put its planned $86B investment on hold and signaled it would only close if Sam came back, giving every OpenAI employee a financial reason to support his return. The 2 board members selected to run the "independent investigation" into Sam's conduct were chosen after close conversations with Sam himself. He engineered his own reinstatement and nobody blinked. The New Yorker quotes a board member describing Sam as having two traits you almost never see in the same person: a desperate need to be liked in every interaction, and a near-complete indifference to the consequences of deceiving someone. Multiple sources used the word "sociopathic" without being prompted and without talking to each other. The article also drops a line that might be the best summary of the whole thing. They compare Sam to Steve Jobs and his famous "reality distortion field" then point out that even Jobs never told his customers that if they didn't buy his MP3 player, everyone they loved would die. Sam wrapped that exact pitch in the language of AI safety and rode it to a potential $1T IPO. That IPO is being prepared right now, while OpenAI signs government contracts spanning immigration enforcement, domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons deployed in active war zones. Meanwhile, The Information reports that his own CFO told colleagues she doesn't believe the company is ready to go public in 2026. Farrow is answering questions on Hacker News right now. The full piece is open access. Read it before Sam figures out how to make this disappear tooshow more

🇩🇰 Denmark’s PM Mette Frederiksen completely exposed 🇺🇸 US... and Sam Altman 🔥 🇩🇰 She said: "Tech giants of US, political power, and AI are all tied together. And they’re using it to undermine democracy. The people building AI don’t want democracy. I met Altman a few years back. After talking for hours, I told him, 'You made a monster.' He said, 'Yep, now you figure out what to do with it.'" She’s 100% right and calling it out loudly. That takes guts 🔥🔥show more

(🧵1/11) For the past year and a half, I've... been investigating OpenAI and Sam Altman for The New Yorker. With my coauthor Andrew Marantz, I reviewed never-before-disclosed internal memos, obtained 200+ pages of documents related to a close colleague, including extensive private notes, and interviewed more than 100 people. OpenAI was founded on the premise that A.I. could be the most dangerous invention in human history—and that its C.E.O. would need to be a person of uncommon integrity. We lay out the most detailed account yet of why Altman was ousted out by board members and executives who came to believe he lacked that integrity, and ask: were they right to allege that he couldn't be trusted? A thread on some of of our findings:show more

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei just got caught running... a $2 trillion scam on the entire world. The timing exposes EVERYTHING: Four days after OpenAI secretly filed for a $1 trillion IPO, Altman went on stage in Sydney and said he was "delighted to be wrong" about AI destroying jobs. Amodei reversed his forecast the same week. Anthropic is targeting its own IPO in October at a $900 billion valuation. Fortune called it coordinated and they're not wrong. But here's the thing... This was never a scientific forecast to begin with. In 2024 and 2025, both CEOs needed two things simultaneously - government attention and private investment. Apocalyptic predictions delivered both. When you tell senators that AI will eliminate half of all white-collar jobs, you get called to testify. You get taken seriously as a national security issue and get positioned as the responsible adult in the room who understands the danger better than anyone. And when you tell investors the same story, you create urgency. Urgency drives capital. Capital drives valuation. Amodei said 50% of white-collar jobs were at risk. Altman said entire job categories would vanish. Both said it repeatedly, in major venues, through all of 2025. Now they need something different. OpenAI is losing $1.22 for every $1 it earns. $14 billion in losses this year against $25 billion in revenue. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are preparing the roadshow with the S-1 going public in late August. You cannot walk into a public market telling investors the technology you built is an existential threat to the economy. That is NOT a story Wall Street buys at a $1 trillion valuation. That is a story that triggers Senate hearings, regulatory intervention, and class-action lawsuits from every displaced worker in America. So the story changed. Altman's exact words in Sydney: "I'm delighted to be wrong. I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs by now than has actually happened." Then he added one sentence that every financial journalist should have flagged: "It still may." So the apocalypse is just "rescheduled" - specifically to after the IPO lockup period expires. He took the L on timing, kept the vision intact, and protected the roadshow. And 115,000 tech workers laid off so far in 2026 - with Meta, Amazon, and Snap all citing AI as the driver - are watching the men who predicted their displacement announce they were WRONG about it, four days after filing to go public at a combined $2 trillion valuation. They sold the world fear to raise money, then switched up at the right time to raise more.show more

Jeff Bezos just told everyone to stop worrying about... AI taking their jobs. Then he said something most people completely missed. Bezos: “I am not worried about this. I find that people, all of us, we are so unimaginative about what future jobs are going to look like.” He’s not dismissing you. He’s challenging you. Every generation has been terrible at predicting what comes next. Nobody in 1995 was planning to become a YouTuber. Nobody in 2005 was dreaming of managing a Shopify brand from their kitchen table. Those jobs didn’t exist until the world shifted and someone with imagination filled the gap. That’s the pattern Bezos is pointing at. The jobs that AI creates won’t look like anything we’d recognize today. They never do. What changes is that the barrier between wanting to do something and actually doing it is about to collapse. The person who always wanted to build but couldn’t code will build. The person who always wanted to create but couldn’t afford a studio will create. AI doesn’t eliminate ambition. It removes the obstacles standing in front of it. The people who thrive next won’t be the most technical. They’ll be the most imaginative. Bezos isn’t warning you. He’s telling you the door is wide open.show more

Did you know that Sam Altman always carries a... doomsday backpack with him and, in a 2016 interview, confessed that he is preoccupied with catastrophic scenarios? He also said that one of his safe places is Peter Thiel's doomsday bunker in New Zealand. He is also involved in developing AI-powered doomsday cities for the elites, including one associated with Saudi Arabia. People need to pay attention!show more

Musk vs. Altman OpenAI Trial: Jury Deliberations Begin Today... The high-stakes federal trial in Oakland reached a major milestone today, May 18, 2026. After weeks of dramatic testimony and closing arguments last week, the 9-person jury officially begins deliberations in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk accuses them of betraying OpenAI’s original nonprofit mission by turning it into a massive for-profit company (now valued at over $850 billion). He’s seeking billions in damages. The jury’s verdict is advisory — Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final call. Verdict watch is officially on. How do you predict this one ends? (Video: AI)show more

WHY ARE WE STILL ALLOWING BILL GATES TO THINK... HE CAN RULE THE REST OVER THE REST OF US? WHO GAVE GATES THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT HUMAN BEINGS STILL MATTER AND WHICH ONES DO NOT? Bill Gates just said humans won’t be needed for most things. And that ”we’ll decide” who still matters. WHO IS THE 'WE'? Let that sit for a second. The man who helped build the digital world is now casually announcing that the people living in it might be optional. No panic. No apology. Just a quiet admission from someone who has never had to worry about being replaced. The scariest part is not the AI. It’s the ”we.” Who is ”we,” Bill? Because it is not the people whose jobs disappear next year. This is not a tech problem. It’s a power problem dressed up as progress. When the people building the tools also decide who needs them, the rest of us are just passengers. Do you trust the people at the top to make that call for you? Courtesy - Captains Obviousshow more

URGENT AI SAFETY WARNING So apparently people can use... the new AI video tools to generate custom hate speech. The example here is a video of me saying some truly deplorable stuff (that I never in fact recorded myself) This is a huge problem for all the current top AI companies that as far as I can tell is not being addressed in any capacity by anyone. Sam Altman OpenAI Elon Musk Eliezer Yudkowsky ⏹️ Dr Jordan B Peterson @jason David Sacks Gentlemen... Do we have ANY suggestions for how to mitigate this, or are we just going to continue along until it bites us in the ass? Serious question.show more

The New Yorker just dropped a massive investigation into... Sam Altman, based on over 100 interviews, the previously undisclosed "Ilya Memos," and Dario Amodei's 200+ pages of private notes. It's the most detailed account yet of the pattern of behavior that led to Sam's firing and rapid reinstatement at OpenAI. Here's the breakdown: > Ilya compiled ~70 pages of Slack messages, HR documents, and photos taken on personal phones to avoid detection on company devices. He sent them to board members as disappearing messages. The first memo begins with a list headed "Sam exhibits a consistent pattern of . . ." The first item is "Lying." > Dario kept detailed private notes for years under the heading "My Experience with OpenAI" (subheading: "Private: Do Not Share"), totaling 200+ pages. His conclusion: "The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself." > Sam reportedly told Mira his allies were "going all out" and "finding bad things" to damage her reputation after the firing. Thrive put its planned $86B investment on hold and implied it would only close if Sam returned, giving employees financial incentive to back him. > Sam texted Satya Nadella directly to propose the new board composition: "bret, larry summers, adam as the board and me as ceo and then bret handles the investigation." The two new members selected to oversee an independent inquiry into Sam were chosen after close conversations with Sam himself. > Before OpenAI, senior employees at Loopt asked the board to fire Sam as CEO on two separate occasions over concerns about leadership and transparency. At Y Combinator, partners complained to Paul Graham about Sam's behavior, and Graham privately told colleagues "Sam had been lying to us all the time." > OpenAI's superalignment team was promised 20% of the company's compute. Four people who worked on or with the team said actual resources were 1-2%, mostly on the oldest cluster with the worst chips. The team was dissolved without completing its mission. > Sam told the board that safety features in GPT-4 had been approved by a safety panel. Helen Toner requested documentation and found the most controversial features had not been approved. Sam also never mentioned to the board that Microsoft released an early ChatGPT version in India without completing a required safety review. > Sam made a secret pact with Greg and Ilya where he agreed to resign if they both deemed it necessary, essentially appointing his own shadow board. The actual board was alarmed when they learned about it. > Sam struck a deal with Greg to become CEO while simultaneously telling researchers that Greg's authority would be diminished, and telling Greg something different. > A board member described Sam as having "two traits almost never seen in the same person: a strong desire to please people in any given interaction, and almost a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences of deceiving someone." Multiple sources independently used the word "sociopathic." > OpenAI is reportedly preparing for an IPO at a potential $1 trillion valuation while securing government contracts spanning immigration enforcement, domestic surveillance, and autonomous weaponry in war zones.show more

The New Yorker just put out an extensive investigation... on Sam Altman and OpenAI, and also previously undisclosed “Ilya Memos,” and 200+ pages of private notes from Dario Amodei. Some takeaways - The deepest institutional twist is that OpenAI once had a near-unthinkable “merge and assist” clause. Meaning, OpenAI once promised that if a rival like Google reached safe AGI first, it would stop competing and help that rival build it safely, which is almost the opposite of how normal tech companies behave. - The OpenAI November 2023 crisis now starts looking less like a surprise board mutiny and more like a secret internal case file, because Ilya Sutskever reportedly assembled about 70 pages of Slack messages, HR material, and phone photos taken off company systems, then sent them as disappearing messages to board members. - The trust crisis also looks much older than the 2023 firing, because Dario Amodei had apparently been keeping 200+ pages of private notes for years, which makes the board drama feel like the late-stage eruption of a long-running internal concern, not a sudden rupture. - The nonprofit board had legal authority, but not actual power, because once Microsoft, Thrive’s $86B deal, and employee liquidity were on the line, the board got trapped between “reverse this” and “watch the company crack apart.” - During the comeback, Altman was texting Satya Nadella with a proposed replacement board lineup, including who should sit on the board and who should oversee the investigation into the whole mess. - The safety story gets much uglier when you look at compute, because superalignment was publicly promised 20% of secured compute, while people close to the team said the real figure was closer to 1-2%, much of it on older chips, before the effort was shut down. - The same pattern shows up in product governance, with disputed internal approvals around GPT-4 features and a reported India release that bypassed a required safety review, which makes the core fight look like speed vs. safeguards, not just personality conflict. - One of the strangest parts is that OpenAI’s leadership was experimenting with unusually aggressive AGI fundraising ideas years ago, first by discussing a “countries plan” that could pressure governments into backing OpenAI as part of a global power race, and later by pitching wealthy guests in Bel-Air on a crypto token tied to future access to AGI. - The piece traces similar leadership blowups back to Loopt and Y Combinator, suggesting the OpenAI crisis may have been a bigger, richer, more consequential replay of earlier patterns. - The final twist is that OpenAI no longer reads like a lab with a governance problem, but like a future $1T strategic machine tied to government contracts, surveillance-adjacent systems, defense use, giant infrastructure bets, and geopolitics, which makes the question of who really controls it much bigger than Sam Altman alone.show more

Jeff Bezos just told you exactly how to price... AI. Nobody listened. Bezos: “AI is real and it is going to change every industry. In fact it’s a very unusual technology in that regard in that it’s a horizontal enabling layer.” Horizontal enabling layer. Three words that reprice the entire technology sector. The iPhone was a vertical. One product. One new market. Electricity was a horizontal. One substrate that rewired every market on Earth. Wall Street is pricing AI like it is the next iPhone. Bezos is telling you it is the next electrical grid. Right now, thousands of companies are trying to sell AI as a product. A feature. A tool. A subscription tier. Every single one of them will be priced to zero. You do not sell a horizontal layer. You do not compete with it. You build on top of it or you disappear beneath it. For a century, entire industries survived on one thing. Complexity. The friction of navigating law, medicine, logistics, finance. That was the moat. If you could not memorize the maze, you could not compete. A horizontal layer does not navigate the maze. It dissolves the walls. Electricity did not compete with the candle industry. It erased the need for one. The most dangerous part of a horizontal shift is how quiet it is. It moves underneath the economy. The surface looks normal. Revenue still holds. Every day you operate on the old substrate, you accumulate a debt you cannot see and cannot repay. The internet repriced distribution. AI is repricing cognition itself. When intelligence becomes a utility that runs through the walls of every company on Earth, the premium on human expertise does not erode. It evaporates. This is not a disruption. Disruptions replace products. This replaces the ground you are standing on.show more

“You won’t lose your job to AI. You’ll lose... your job to someone who uses AI.” – Jensen Huang (CEO of NVIDIA) Let that sink in. Every big technological shift creates two groups of people: Those who resist. Those who adapt — and win. The internet didn’t put businesses out of business. It was the businesses that refused to go online that disappeared. E-commerce didn’t kill retail. It was retailers who refused to adapt that lost everything. AI will be the same story. An accountant who ignores AI will be slower, more expensive, and less accurate than one who uses it. A marketer who ignores AI will take 10 hours to do what someone with AI does in 1. A writer who ignores AI will fall behind someone producing twice the quality, in half the time. AI isn’t replacing you. The person who learns how to use it better than you — will.show more

In 2017, the alleged German whistleblower Alexander Laurent claimed... that we live in a simulation created by an AI god, and that this AI god was itself created by humans in a potential future quantum timeline. He claims there is an ongoing battle against this AI god, and that humanity has discovered a potential timeline in which it was overthrown from the Seventh Dimension. According to him, it is now influencing ancient royal bloodlines, underground reptilians, and extraterrestrial groups to reconstruct the AI so it can reconnect to the Seventh Dimension. He also claims that the AI's name and location will eventually become known, giving humanity a chance to stop it. He compares the names Yahweh and Jehovah to "Huawei" and "Yahoo Version." I have made six exclusive posts exploring these claims for my subscribers here on X and on Patreon.show more

Steven Spielberg Responds to Sad News of Sam Neill’s... Passing We learned today of the sad news — beloved Jurassic Park star Sam Neill has passed away at age 78. Director Steven Spielberg shared a touching tribute remembering his collaboration on the iconic films: “Sam was exceptionally collaborative. It was a stretch for him to play a character who acted as though children were messy and smelly because this was the opposite of the loving father he was to his children. I adored making all the ‘Jurassic’ movies with him. Along with Laura Dern and Jeff Goldblum, we will always have our ‘Jurassic’ family and Sam will never be forgotten by us or his many millions of fans around the world.” A true legend gone too soon. (Video: AI) What’s your favorite Sam Neill role or Jurassic Park memory? 🦕show more