South Korea's election commission finally addressed transparency concerns. Their... solution: make the ballot box stand clear. Not the box. The stand. For years, South Korea's National Election Commission has faced mounting questions about election integrity: ･ Ballots stored in plastic shopping bags (2022) ･ 30-40 ballots removed from a Seoul polling station during early voting (May 2025) ･ Old 2024 general election ballots found inside 2025 presidential election boxes ･ A poll worker arrested for voting with her spouse's ID ･ The NEC's own cybersecurity was breached in a 2023 test by the National Intelligence Service ･ The NEC refused to meet with a U.S. election monitoring delegation that traveled to Korea specifically to observe ･ The NEC proposed making it a crime — punishable by up to 10 years in prison — to publicly question election results. It backed down only after a public outcry. Citizens demanded structural reform. Independent oversight. The NEC's answer for the June 3 local elections: a see-through plastic stand. The ballots themselves still go into thin bags inside. Koreans are fed up. "Is this a joke?" they're asking. Sources: Korea Herald — "Ballots and Blunders" editorial Asia Times — "Mismanaged early voting stirs voter distrust"show more

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Allows Late Ballots in 30+ States... — (Video: AI) How ridiculous is it that ballots arriving after Election Day can still be counted in Mississippi and roughly 30 other states? The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling (written by Justice Barrett) lets states keep counting absentee ballots mailed by Election Day but received days later. This creates uncertainty and opens the door to questions about election integrity. Shame on SCOTUS for failing to enforce a clear, uniform Election Day deadline. Do you think ballots arriving after Election Day should be counted, or does this undermine trust in our elections?show more

USPS Moves Forward With Major Mail-In Voting Change The... U.S. Postal Service is proceeding with a significant new rule for mail-in ballots following a federal appeals court decision on Friday. The change requires states to provide voter lists and serialized ballot barcodes before federal ballots are mailed — a move supporters call a win for election integrity. (Video: AI) This could have big implications for California, where nearly all voters receive ballots by mail. The ruling allows the proposal to advance while legal challenges continue. A positive step toward greater transparency and confidence in the voting process.show more

Election Fraud Exposed on Long Island – Clerk Tore... Up Ballots for Victor Pratt! 🇺🇸 A Hempstead Union Free School District clerk named April Keys was caught smuggling official ballots out of her office, handing absentee ballots to favored candidate Victor Pratt, tearing them up, and dumping them in the trash to help him win the May 19 trustee election by just 81 votes. This is exactly why mail-in voting needs to be banned — too easy to abuse, too hard to secure. The district is now asking the state to overturn the entire election due to “widespread irregularities” that “vitiated the electoral process.” How many more cases like this will it take before we demand paper ballots, same-day voting, and strict ID requirements? (Video: AI)show more

LATEST from Seoul, South Korea — Late into the... night at Olympic Park and Jamsil polling areas, determined crowds continue chanting ‘Re-election! Invalidate the fraud!’ after shocking ballot shortages disrupted the June 3 local elections. Protesters blocked ballot boxes for over 35 hours, refusing to allow counting amid allegations of electoral manipulation by the pro-China leftist government. Hundreds to thousands gathered, waving Korean flags and demanding a full restart of the vote. The National Election Commission (NEC) admitted major failures in ballot preparation — underestimating same-day turnout after heavy early voting, especially hitting conservative strongholds. NEC Chairman Roh Tae-ak resigned in apology, but protesters and opposition voices insist this points to deeper fraud, not just incompetence. This comes against a backdrop of deep distrust following previous election controversies. Patriots are standing strong, calling for transparency, investigation, and protection of South Korea’s democracy from external influences. Freedom-loving Koreans won’t stay silent! Share widely — the world is watching. #SouthKoreaProtests #ElectionFraud #RestartTheElection #StandWithKoreashow more

BREAKING: EXPLOSIVE:🚨 ALARMING REPORTS: AfD OMITTED FROM LEIPZIG BALLOTS—DEMOCRACY... UNDER THREAT! 🚨 🔴 Voters in Leipzig are sounding the alarm: ballots are missing the column to vote for the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. 🔴 Multiple complaints have surfaced, yet mainstream media remains silent on this critical issue. 🔴 This raises a serious question: Are globalist forces so threatened by a potential AfD victory that they're resorting to election interference? 🔥 DEMOCRACY DEMANDS TRANSPARENCY—ELECTION INTEGRITY IS NON-NEGOTIABLE! 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS:⚠️ If these allegations hold true, it signifies a deliberate attempt to sabotage the democratic process. ⚠️ Such actions could render the entire election invalid, undermining public trust in our institutions. ⚠️ It's imperative that authorities investigate immediately and ensure that every voter's voice is heard fairly. 💥 The will of the people cannot be suppressed. Election integrity is the cornerstone of our democracy. 💥 🚨 STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS—DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY NOW! 🚨 Elon Muskshow more

🚨 DeWine Vetoes Photo ID for Mail-In Voting: Traitor... to Election Integrity! Why is a Republican governor blocking basic voter ID protections? Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine just vetoed legislation that would have required photo ID to cast mail-in ballots — calling it too much “burden” despite the obvious need for security. DeWine is a traitor to commonsense election reform. Every state should require voter ID to protect our votes! Shame on him for siding with open-door policies over secure elections. America demands real integrity at the ballot box — no more excuses. Do you think it’s time to hold RINOs like DeWine accountable and push voter ID nationwide? (Video: AI)show more

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE... BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.show more

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND... NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.show more

#ZimElection2023 CHAMISA RAN HIS CAMPAIGN LIKE AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE... WITH NO STRUCTURES AND EXPECTED TO WIN AND BECOME PRESIDENT WITH NO MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT This is what Nelson Chamisa said on 21 June 2023 about the strategic thrust of the campaign of his CCC in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week: "our [CCC] campaign is going to be basically a presidential... our [CCC] focus is not to be in parliament but to be in government. We [as MDC opposition] have been in parliament for a long time, that's not our [CCC] station of choice at the moment". The fact that Chamisa thought he could win the presidential election even if, or regardless of whether, his CCC won a majority in Parliament, explains his crushing defeat. An election in Zimbabwe is defined in terms of section 4 of the Electoral Act which provides that: election” means— (a) the election of a member of Parliament; or (b) an election to the office of President; or (c) an election for the purposes of the Rural District Councils Act [Chapter 29:13] or the Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29:15]; as the case may be. These three elections used to be held separately before they were harmonised for the first time in the 2008 election in terms of section 38 of the Act. It is odd and even irrational, and it defies the logic of the harmonised general election for any political party that seeks power to govern the country as a whole to only target – as did Chamisa in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week –winning only one of the three elections, just the presidential election. It is foolhardy for a political party to say its strategy and focus is only to win the presidential election, without basing that strategy and focus on winning the local authority and parliamentary elections, as well. Such a strategy, if it can be called a strategy, renders the presidential candidate no different from an independent presidential candidate who contests for the presidency without the advantage of the structures of a political party. Simply put, a presidential candidate in Zimbabwe cannot win a presidential election if the candidate does not have a campaign strategy that is based on his or her political party winning a majority of wards in the local authority election, and a majority of constituencies in the parliamentary election. If it’s an independent presidential candidate, then he or she must have ground structures of one sort or another, or forget it. Chamisa contested the presidential election as if he was an independent candidate, and he boasted about it, without relying on his CCC and without any ground structures. In the circumstances, just how or why did Chamisa expect to win the presidential election by effectively running as an independent candidate? Which structures did Chamisa expect to use, or did he in fact use to campaign for the presidency in every street and every village, across the length and breadth of the country? Since by his own admission, as quoted above and reflected on the attached video clip, Chamisa was clearly not relying on his CCC to win the presidency. This begs the question: by not relying on CCC structures, and by not having alternative ground structures in the streets and in villages, did Chamisa think that ZanuPF members and supports would vote for him, as an act of God, perhaps? Was Chamisa's presidential election campaign, for him an article of faith, in other words was it about his belief that God had chosen him, and that he would win regardless of whether or not CCC won a majority in the local authority and parliamentary elections? Where did Chamisa and his supporters in Zimbabwe and among the legions of his fans in America and Europe think he would get the necessary number of polling agents to monitor the voting and vote counting at the country’s 12,374 polling stations, and to secure the 12,374 V11s from those polling stations, given the fact that he actually ran for the presidency as an independent candidate, expecting to be supported less by his own CCC party and more by the members and supporters of ZanuPF? Does this kind of strategy make sense to anyone on earth? And, does that strategy make sense to Nerves Mumba and his Sadc Election Observation Mission or to any other foreign election observation mission that was in Zimbabwe last week like, say for example, the European Union Observer Mission or any of the several observer missions from the United States that were in Zimbabwe to observe the elections? How did the various foreign election observer missions and Chamisa’s social media supporters expect him to win the presidential election, not only where and when his CCC party was losing the local authority and parliamentary elections but, and critically, where Chamisa himself did not believe that the local authority and parliamentary elections were important or necessary for him to win the presidency? The fact that the loquacious, belligerent and inflammatory foreign election observer missions that are peddling falsehoods about the elections, and Chamisa’s social media supporters who claim with no evidence that Chamisa won, did not raise a finger against the results of the local and parliamentary elections that were declared at 1970 wards and 209 constituencies well ahead of the declaration of the result for the presidential election on 26 August, clearly means that there was no problem with two of the three elections that make up Zimbabwe’s harmonised general election. Only after the declaration of the presidential election result on 26 August did all hell break loose. It must be asked, again, how did anyone expect Chamisa to win a presidential election whose campaign was – as per Chamisa’s deliberate strategy – organised and pursued as if it was the presidential campaign of an independent candidate? Chamisa’s presidential election campaign was not based on the CCC parliamentary election campaign or on CCC’s structural capacity on the ground, strangely, it was based on the expectation that ZanuPF members and supporters would vote for Chamisa. Why on earth did anyone expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for someone whose base is ever singing cacophonic noise that ZanuPF must go, and hurling insults at the incumbent party, its officials and its supporters? What kind of politics is that? You are contemptuous of ZanuPF and anyone associated with it, but you expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for you. This expectation does not compute, certainly not in electoral politics. As things turned out, ZanuPF members and supporters who are registered voters voted for their party candidates in all the three elections: local authority election, the parliamentary election and the presidential election. As a result, in the parliamentary election, CCC won just 73 constituency seats. There's just no way that CCC's 73 constituency seats in the National Assembly would have boosted Chamisa to win the presidency. No ways. In Zimbabwe's first harmonised general election in 2008, Morgan Tsvangirai did well in the first round of the presidential election primarily if not only because the two MDC formations used their round structures to win a majority in Parliament with a combined strength of 110 constituency seats, while ZanuPF garnered 99 seats and an independent got one seat. This was the first time since independence in 1980 that the opposition commanded the majority in Parliament. So, clearly, in 2008 Tsvangirai was propelled by the solid parliamentary performance of the MDC formations. The same structural dynamic was conspicuously absent for Chamisa in the just ended harmonised general election. Chamisa ran a solo presidential election campaign and, predictably, it went horribly wrong. The fact that CCC did not field local authority candidates in 90 wards made a bad situation worse for Chamisa, and it was further compounded by the fact that CCC did not have ground structures to harness and harvest from the loose and unreliable protest vote, especially in the wards and constituencies outside CCC strongholds, which in fact used to be MDC strongholds in the days of Morgan Tsvangirai!show more

Over 6,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote in NJ Due... to Software Error — Yet Gov. Sherrill Blames Trump A major election integrity issue in New Jersey: More than 6,000 non-citizens were automatically added to voter rolls because of a DMV software glitch, with around 400 illegally casting ballots since 2023. Democratic Gov. Mikie Sherrill admitted the problem and confirmed non-citizens voted: “Approximately 400 non-citizens cast ballots illegally in New Jersey elections since 2023 after more than 6,000 were wrongly added to the Garden State’s voter rolls.” Despite this, she still blamed President Trump: “I think that Donald Trump has done more to undermine free elections in this country than certainly anyone in my lifetime, including Vladimir Putin… [he] has zero credibility on the issue of election integrity.” (Video: AI) The error occurred under automatic registration in the prior administration. Sherrill called it unacceptable and is now fixing it. This case shows why proof of citizenship safeguards are vital to protect legal American votes and restore confidence. Election integrity matters for fair outcomes. Pass the SAVE America Act!show more

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT... DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.show more

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨 The Fulton County Georgia FBI Raid... Affidavit CONFIRMS Election Records in Fulton County's 2020 Vote Count was MANIPULATED 1. Only 16 tabulators out of an expected much larger number were used to generate closing data for about 315,000 ballots across 138 provided poll tapes. This extreme concentration improperly funneled through a small set of machines, breaking chain-of-custody rules and making it easier to alter election results 2. Review of machine logs indicated that memory cards were likely removed from their original tabulators and inserted into different ones to produce or recreate closing poll tapes. This indictated tampering or fabrication of records to cover up discrepancies, as it allows data to be manipulated OUTSIDE the standard process. 3. Many closing poll tapes—essential documents that verify end-of-day vote totals from each polling site—were entirely MISSING from the records provided. Without these, there's no way to confirm that votes weren't added, removed, or changed post-election. FRAUD. 4. It was discovered that the Tabulator's data appeared to cover ballots from several different polling sites, which shouldn't happen under normal procedures. This suggests intentional mixing of data streams, which leads to DUPLICATE votes, misplaced ballots, or hidden errors across precincts. 5. Tabulators showed mismatched or anomalous timestamps in their logs, such as dates and times that didn't align with actual election events. This could indicate backdating, editing, or unauthorized access AFTER polls closed, further hinting at possible manipulation to make records appear consistent. 6. Auditors assisting in the Risk Limiting Audit reported counting purported absentee ballots that had never been creased or folded, as would be required for the ballot to be mailed to the voter and for the ballot to be returned in the sealed envelope requiring the voter’s signature for authentication. Affidavitshow more

URGENT BREAKING: The FBI and National Intelligence Agencies have... just confirmed that this video which was shared by MAGA voters on X claiming that Haitians are voting in Georgia, was produced by the Russians. Here is their FULL Statement: The IC assesses that Russian influence actors manufactured a recent video that falsely depicted individuals claiming to be from Haiti and voting illegally in multiple counties in Georgia. This judgment is based on information available to the IC and prior activities of other Russian influence actors, including videos and other disinformation activities. The Georgia Secretary of State has already refuted the video's claims as false. Russian influence actors also manufactured a video falsely accusing an individual associated with the Democratic presidential ticket of taking a bribe from a U.S. entertainer. This Russian activity is part of Moscow's broader effort to raise unfounded questions about the integrity of the US election and stoke divisions among Americans, as detailed in prior ODNI election updates. In the lead up to election day and in the weeks and months after, the IC expects Russia to create and release additional media content that seeks to undermine trust in the integrity of the election and divide Americans."show more

🚨 Late-night votes just flipped the 2026 CA Governor... race. As of June 5, with only 60% of ballots counted days after the election, DDHQ has called it for Becerra — projecting mail-in ballots will push him past Hilton for the top spot. Current snapshot: • Hilton: 27.18% (1,535,566 votes) • Becerra: 26.04% (1,470,970 votes) ✅ • Steyer: 20.19% Top 2 advance to November. California’s mail-in ballot system is a mess — slow counts, massive delays, and lingering doubt. This is exactly why the SAVE America Act is critical for securing our federal elections. Clean, fair, and timely voting matters. 🇺🇸 Should the federal government pass requirements for state elections such as for governor and mayor that mandate a certain time turnaround? (Video: AI)show more

Pennsylvania is engaging in SERIOUS ELECTION INTERFERENCE all over... the state, and the Governor is SILENT! 🚨🚨🚨 Multiple locations around Bucks County (Quakertown, Doylestown) Police are cutting the line off extremely EARLY in the afternoon even though they aren’t supposed to close until 5PM ON THE LAST DAY OF EARLY VOTING IN PA, which is a form of VOTER INTIMIDATION and is ILLEGAL. The reason they are cutting off the lines early? TOO MANY REPUBLICANS ARE VOTING. Not only that, but there are Democrats walking around with “Voter Protection” badges, making an impersonation of election officials and using mafia style intimidation tactics. By the looks of it, they are going for BROKE this time… This is even MORE aggressive and egregious than the tactics in 2020. It is blatant and IN YOUR FACE. We are facing a REAL Communist Revolution in the United States, like I have been warning about for MANY MONTHS and it is manifesting in plain sight at the polls a week out from Election Day. Thank you for putting a spotlight on this kellyannlu17🇺🇸🐸⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🫡show more

Someone explain how this is legal No seriously, how... do ballot drop boxes make any sense. They are out here unattended, anyone can come here at any time and drop as many ballots in as they want This is San Diego, California but they’re all over America Ballot drop boxes have legitimate security vulnerabilities: - Drop boxes, including in San Diego, sit in public places like parks, libraries, or sidewalks with no human monitoring. A motivated actor could insert pre-filled fraudulent ballots, especially if ballot harvesting or third-party collection is involved - Vandalism Incidents occur nationwide every election with drop boxes - There are ‘Chain of Custody Gaps.’ Ballots sit inside until scheduled pickups, delays and improper seals create windows for interference There is real evidence for this, reports from San Diego in the Chula Vista area highlighted improperly affixed seals on Election Day In states like California with universal mail-in ballots, drop boxes amplify concerns about signature verification failures and harvesting coercion and of course non-citizen and duplicate voting You want to know how you they are being used to rig elections? Because California mandated them LIn California law requires counties to provide drop boxes at least one per 30,000 voters or minimums Democrats rig electionsshow more

🇺🇸 THE COURTS SCREW US AGAIN! - Why can't... we just get the courts to go along with preventing mail-in ballot fraud? Let me paint the picture for you. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order on mail voting. Homeland Security would build a list of confirmed citizens eligible to vote in each state, pulled from citizenship and naturalization records. The Postal Service would then deliver ballots only to people on that list. Simple. Verify the citizen, then mail the ballot. And the courts are actually blocking this! A judge in Boston froze it on June 25 after 23 states and DC sued. Saturday the First Circuit backed her two to one, three months out from the midterms! Frustration! But let's look closer at that ruling: The appeals court never decided whether the order is actually legal. Justice argued the suit "came too early" since no agency had finalized any rules, and the panel simply said the states can sue now instead of waiting. That's a fight over timing, not the merits. A damned technicality! And a judge in Washington already went the other way on a similar challenge. This is a split heading for the Supreme Court, not a settled verdict! Once again everyone is punting! France banned mail voting back in 1975 after ballots in Corsica were cast for dead men. Why can't America just get this right? So what now? The judge said Congress never gave the President this power, and she has a point. There's already a bill for that. It's called the SAVE America Act. Once again the courts have failed us on election integrity. Am I looking at this wrong? ⬇️show more

🚨 NOW: Elon Musk just came out in support... of Spencer Pratt's crusade against California election cheating, saying — "CALIFORNIA HAS LEGALIZED ELECTION FRAUD" Expose it all! 🔥 PRATT: "This is what California has done with the elections. Unsolicited ballots going into open mailboxes and NGOs and parking lots. Bank vault is wide open. No signature required, no ID required, no way to ID the robbers...All the fraud that does occur happens long before the ballots even hit this building!" "The modern Communist agrees with the old Communist, but just the first part. It doesn't matter who votes. It doesn't matter if it's a drug zombie being paid for their ballot...The bank vault is wide open. The cameras have been removed and there's no way to count the money." "It ends with commie animals in handcuffs. I will restore faith in our elections if it's the last thing I do!" "And to all you fraudsters out there, we've been watching you. And justice is coming." 🔥🔥🔥 Elon Musk Spencer Prattshow more

And here it is, 🚨🚨Documents obtained by investigative journalist... Yehuda Miller through the Freedom of Information Act, CONFIRMS, BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The Department of Justice and the FBI uncovered a massive 2020 ballot fraud operation based in Michigan and operated in multiple swing states including Washington DC, Chicago, IL, Georgia, Iowa, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Florida, funded by Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign. GBI strategies BUSTED for submitting fraudulent voter registrations during 2020 election cycle. Following a raid, Michigan law enforcement discovered caches of pre-paid gift cards, semi-automatic rifles with silencers, four modified pistols with ammunition inside. and disposable burner phones. Throughout the 2020 election period, these Democratic cartel election committees provided more than $4,000,000 to this criminal organization: Biden for President: $450,000 Democratic Senatorial Campaign: $2,117,605 DNC Services Corp: $1,031,856 Democratic Party of Iowa: $493,100 The investigation was initiated following the observation of a Muskegon, Michigan, clerk who noticed an individual depositing 8,000 to 10,000 completed voter registration applications at the city office on October 8, 2020. This same individual returned multiple times, registering an additional 2,500 voters. Thousands of these registrations displayed identical handwriting with fraudulent addresses and phone numbers. Additionally signatures did not match those on file with the criminal Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. 🚨🚨And the icing on the cake. + 100,000 ballots cast in the Nov 3, 2020 election were also falsified at Jocelyn Benson’s own election headquarters. FOIA: “I am following up with some information on one of the most egregious situations that I encountered. There are many examples of significant election integrity issues, but this example involves actions of GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS from both the local and state levels that are shocking.” Dawn N. Ison Department of Justice Assistant U.S. Attorney | public corruption unit, “We received this complaint. Guess what the criminals do, when the FBI and the DOJ got hold of this investigation? Passed it right back to this criminal who were running it, 📝who the fuck was she planning to shoot?show more

I am bringing a serious matter of electoral malpractice... and illegal interference to the immediate notice of the Election Commission of India. It has come to our knowledge that a person named Mojarul; who is a Personnel of the Kolkata Police, hailing from Nandigram, is unauthorizedly handling Voter Lists and actively summoning Police Personnel to the SDO Office in Haldia to cast their votes. He is reportedly instructing them to bring their Departmental I-Cards and Voter IDs for this purpose. This is a violation and illegal Interference. A Serving Police Personnel has no authority to manage voter lists or "coordinate" the voting process of other personnel in this manner. This is a clear attempt to interfere with the Postal Ballot process, potentially compromising the neutrality and secrecy of the vote for Uniformed Personnel. The involvement of a KP personnel in such activity at the Haldia SDO Office raises serious questions about the Jurisdictional Breach and influence being exerted on the ground. I urge the Election Commission of India & CEO West Bengal to take immediate cognizance of this blatant violation, investigate the role of Mojarul and under whose authority he is operating. ECI also must ensure that the Postal Ballot process remains free from the influence of middlemen or partisan elements within the Police Force.show more