Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A Class 12 student, Sarthak Siddhanth, has triggered a major controversy after publicly presenting his findings on alleged discrepancies in tender documents linked to the CBSE’s OSM (On-Screen Marking) system. In a detailed comparison of Request for Proposal (RFP) documents, he claims that several key accountability clauses—such as disqualification...

51,099 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

VIDEO | Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan (Dharmendra Pradhan) on CBSE using OSM for examination paper evaluation, said, "Today, certain issues have come to light regarding the CBSE Class 12 examination evaluation process, and a re-evaluation process will now begin. Around 17 lakh students appeared for the examination, and the answer sheets of each student have been securely preserved. In total, there are 98 lakh answer-sheet copies, with each copy consisting of around 40 pages, which means nearly 40 crore scanned pages were evaluated for the first time by CBSE through the OSM process. OSM is a progressive instrument. Many universities and institutions in India, as well as several institutions across the world, are moving towards this system. It is student-centric and designed for the benefit of students. Through this process, students can transparently access information about their marks, and through scanned copies, they can directly view their answer sheets. It helps address students’ doubts and concerns regarding whether they received fewer or more marks, or whether any answer or section was overlooked during evaluation. This is the first time CBSE has implemented this system in the country. Certain discrepancies have come to our notice, and I take responsibility for them. These issues will be rectified, and appropriate solutions will be worked out. All of us are engaged in this task. We will not leave a single student’s unanswered query or concern unresolved." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

80,788 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Garland Favorito, IT professional, witnessed an abnormal MASSIVE 20,000 vote spike for Joe Biden during the Fulton County 2020 election, while at the same time, Trump's votes were decreasing. He also found boxes of pristine mail-in ballots all for Joe Biden. He filed a sworn affidavit detailing the observation, he notified the Fulton County elections director, the Fulton County Board of Elections, and the county attorney, he submitted an open records request for the interim results, but he was ignored. On top of all of this, his group VoterGA has been looking over Georgia elections for over 16 years and warned the Secretary of State all the way back in 2002 about the unconstitutional systems under evaluation to be used in our elections at that time known as Diebold DRE system. These systems can NOT be audited. He was ignored and the systems were used anyway. In 2009 the Georgia Supreme Court denied his constitutional claims to remove these machines, and then in 2019, the U.S. district court finally banned that system as unconstitutional and then the General Assembly later legalized a new form of voting systems, once again, unverifiable to the voter that hides votes in barcodes. The Secretary of State then purchased the Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 system, a BMD system, "Ballot Marking Device," and here we are today. But the U.S. District Court has already found that it does not meet Georgia law, but were still used anyway, even though other states and counties, like in Texas, denied Dominion machines because of their excessive vulnerabilities and lack of security. Why and how did CISA, DHS, and the EAC, ever clear these machines for use in our elections?

The SCIF

111,333 просмотров • 6 дней назад