Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

A different perspective on AI and jobs — Alberta Tech's blunt take "Nobody’s replacing your job with AI just to wheel you around like a pampered princess in WALL-E. If AI takes everything, you’re not getting free hover chairs. You’re out on the street doing the one manual job... show more

Camus

451,559 subscribers

28,563 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

ELON MUSK: IF YOUR JOB INVOLVES MOVING ATOMS, YOU’RE SAFE. IF IT INVOLVES MOVING DIGITS, AI IS TAKING OVER LIKE LIGHTNING "AI is really still digital. Ultimately, AI can improve the productivity of humans who do things with their hands Literally welding, electrical work, plumbing, anything that involves physically moving atoms. Like cooking food or farming; anything that's physical, those jobs will exist for a much longer time But anything that is digital, which is just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning It's going to take over those jobs like lightning. Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations, but much faster"

ELON MUSK: IF YOUR JOB INVOLVES MOVING ATOMS, YOU’RE SAFE. IF IT INVOLVES MOVING DIGITS, AI IS TAKING OVER LIKE LIGHTNING "AI is really still digital. Ultimately, AI can improve the productivity of humans who do things with their hands Literally welding, electrical work, plumbing, anything that involves physically moving atoms. Like cooking food or farming; anything that's physical, those jobs will exist for a much longer time But anything that is digital, which is just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning It's going to take over those jobs like lightning. Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations, but much faster"

X Freeze

1,812,541 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 THE AI RACE ONLY MATTERS IF PEOPLE CAN PAY BILLS AI vs China sounds like a big-brain DC headline, but Jason Calacanis basically says most Americans don’t wake up thinking about “beating China.” They wake up thinking: can I keep my job, can my kid get hired, why are groceries still expensive, and why does tech feel like it’s replacing us? Then Chamath jumps in with the macro warning: the China fight is existential, but it has to stay in the AI/economic lane, and Silicon Valley needs to prove regular people get a dividend, not just higher stock charts. @jason: "Beating China does not matter to the average American. What they care about is jobs… their kids getting jobs… costs… inflation… energy costs going up. Half the country doesn’t own stocks, so they’re not participating in it. They’re hearing everybody talk about job displacement… and that’s a valid concern. If you lose your job and your kids can’t get a job, that’s existential." Chamath Palihapitiya: "The war with China is existential. If we can keep it on the battlefield of AI and intellectual and economic problems, we have a very good chance of winning. We need to start showing tactical artifacts that show that this is a dividend that can benefit everybody. We have so much cash on the balance sheets of these companies… Wall Street values it at zero… we need to start using that cash more effectively." Source: The All-In Podcast

🇺🇸 THE AI RACE ONLY MATTERS IF PEOPLE CAN PAY BILLS AI vs China sounds like a big-brain DC headline, but Jason Calacanis basically says most Americans don’t wake up thinking about “beating China.” They wake up thinking: can I keep my job, can my kid get hired, why are groceries still expensive, and why does tech feel like it’s replacing us? Then Chamath jumps in with the macro warning: the China fight is existential, but it has to stay in the AI/economic lane, and Silicon Valley needs to prove regular people get a dividend, not just higher stock charts. @jason: "Beating China does not matter to the average American. What they care about is jobs… their kids getting jobs… costs… inflation… energy costs going up. Half the country doesn’t own stocks, so they’re not participating in it. They’re hearing everybody talk about job displacement… and that’s a valid concern. If you lose your job and your kids can’t get a job, that’s existential." Chamath Palihapitiya: "The war with China is existential. If we can keep it on the battlefield of AI and intellectual and economic problems, we have a very good chance of winning. We need to start showing tactical artifacts that show that this is a dividend that can benefit everybody. We have so much cash on the balance sheets of these companies… Wall Street values it at zero… we need to start using that cash more effectively." Source: The All-In Podcast

Mario Nawfal

91,103 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

Arjun Khemani

167,746 просмотров • 1 год назад

The BeyHive takes things way too literal. “Beyoncé hates AI.” Do y’all realize AI is in everything? That automated reply from her site and CÉCRED’? Payment processing? That’s AI too. She doesn’t hate AI. She hates a specific type of AI, y’all just grouped them into one. It’s 2025. Hating AI without understanding it isn’t just ironic, it’s costly. Opportunities, jobs, side hustles, content, business tools, they’re all being shaped by AI. If you’re still treating AI like it’s just ChatGPT or robots, you’re playing yourself out of relevance… and income. It’s like hating the internet in 2010. AI won’t replace jobs, it will replace those who don’t know how to use it.

The BeyHive takes things way too literal. “Beyoncé hates AI.” Do y’all realize AI is in everything? That automated reply from her site and CÉCRED’? Payment processing? That’s AI too. She doesn’t hate AI. She hates a specific type of AI, y’all just grouped them into one. It’s 2025. Hating AI without understanding it isn’t just ironic, it’s costly. Opportunities, jobs, side hustles, content, business tools, they’re all being shaped by AI. If you’re still treating AI like it’s just ChatGPT or robots, you’re playing yourself out of relevance… and income. It’s like hating the internet in 2010. AI won’t replace jobs, it will replace those who don’t know how to use it.

IChooseViolence

419,696 просмотров • 1 год назад

FULL CLIP: Asmongold says AI doesn’t use a lot of water and says that it’s propaganda created by people who are scared of AI taking their jobs or careers 👀😳 “AI doesn’t use a lot of water and the water that it does use is in a closed system. The entire idea that AI is using infinite water and making all the water disappear just isn’t real. If you look at for example almonds in California they cost more water than AI by several magnitudes. It’s just propaganda. And the thing is AI is the new thing that people like to get afraid of and worried about because they’re worried about AI taking their jobs and careers and it’s understandable that people are worried about their jobs or careers but ultimately you can’t expect the entire world to just stop moving forward because you’re worried about your job”

FULL CLIP: Asmongold says AI doesn’t use a lot of water and says that it’s propaganda created by people who are scared of AI taking their jobs or careers 👀😳 “AI doesn’t use a lot of water and the water that it does use is in a closed system. The entire idea that AI is using infinite water and making all the water disappear just isn’t real. If you look at for example almonds in California they cost more water than AI by several magnitudes. It’s just propaganda. And the thing is AI is the new thing that people like to get afraid of and worried about because they’re worried about AI taking their jobs and careers and it’s understandable that people are worried about their jobs or careers but ultimately you can’t expect the entire world to just stop moving forward because you’re worried about your job”

Prism

43,454 просмотров • 10 дней назад

AI is not replacing jobs. There is a fundamental difference between a collection of tasks & a job. Job = U { Tasks, Judgment, Relationships, Context, Ownership} Few jobs are truly at risk of replacement by AI - these involve more deterministic IO (Input Output) execution e.g. data entry, QA, CS etc. Most jobs are resilient because: (1) Human principals (business owners) always seek to assign responsibility & blame to a human agent. (2) Deals get done not because of outbound spam but because of years of nurturing a relationship (showing up at conferences, events, meet-ups) (3) The physical world is messy AF. Humans read non-verbal & subtle cues which are only possible via in-person interactions. The midwits are right - AI is taking over tasks. In fact, if AI hasn’t taken over tasks for you then you’re doing something very wrong. If tasks are automated & workflows are changing, jobs won’t be lost. In fact, to manage the messy transition, humans will be more in demand than ever before. The data from Foundation Labs itself points to this (watch to the end of this rant)

AI is not replacing jobs. There is a fundamental difference between a collection of tasks & a job. Job = U { Tasks, Judgment, Relationships, Context, Ownership} Few jobs are truly at risk of replacement by AI - these involve more deterministic IO (Input Output) execution e.g. data entry, QA, CS etc. Most jobs are resilient because: (1) Human principals (business owners) always seek to assign responsibility & blame to a human agent. (2) Deals get done not because of outbound spam but because of years of nurturing a relationship (showing up at conferences, events, meet-ups) (3) The physical world is messy AF. Humans read non-verbal & subtle cues which are only possible via in-person interactions. The midwits are right - AI is taking over tasks. In fact, if AI hasn’t taken over tasks for you then you’re doing something very wrong. If tasks are automated & workflows are changing, jobs won’t be lost. In fact, to manage the messy transition, humans will be more in demand than ever before. The data from Foundation Labs itself points to this (watch to the end of this rant)

Rahul Mathur

10,664 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Neil Patrick Harris reveals How I Met Your Mother only filmed 22 weeks out of the year and Mondays were a one-hour day “We only filmed for half of the year, really. Because you’re only doing 22 episodes, so that’s 22 weeks out of the year that you’re filming. You got every fourth week off while the writers kind of kept writing and tightened things up” “It was kind of the dream job” “Monday you’d go in for a table read, where you’d sit around a table and you’d read the script so that the network people could hear it, the writers could hear it. They’d know what was landing and wasn’t. You go home. You’d work for one hour on Monday” “Tuesday you’d go in 10 AM. You’d rehearse the scenes with the director and just the cast, and then at like lunchtime 15 people would come in. You’d put on a play. People would laugh, whatever. You go home” “Then Wednesday, Thursday, Friday you’d film. If you weren’t in the scenes, you didn’t have to be there. And we filmed it like it was a sitcom. We didn’t have a studio audience, but we had the cameras as if it was a studio audience” “And then you just got to play for three days. Fantastic. It was the best job”

Neil Patrick Harris reveals How I Met Your Mother only filmed 22 weeks out of the year and Mondays were a one-hour day “We only filmed for half of the year, really. Because you’re only doing 22 episodes, so that’s 22 weeks out of the year that you’re filming. You got every fourth week off while the writers kind of kept writing and tightened things up” “It was kind of the dream job” “Monday you’d go in for a table read, where you’d sit around a table and you’d read the script so that the network people could hear it, the writers could hear it. They’d know what was landing and wasn’t. You go home. You’d work for one hour on Monday” “Tuesday you’d go in 10 AM. You’d rehearse the scenes with the director and just the cast, and then at like lunchtime 15 people would come in. You’d put on a play. People would laugh, whatever. You go home” “Then Wednesday, Thursday, Friday you’d film. If you weren’t in the scenes, you didn’t have to be there. And we filmed it like it was a sitcom. We didn’t have a studio audience, but we had the cameras as if it was a studio audience” “And then you just got to play for three days. Fantastic. It was the best job”

sara

8,612,738 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Yechan's strong opinions AGAINST Generative AI in the artistic space like music or art. #82MAJOR 🐺 Like AI has always been around. It's always been a thing. But it's different when it starts to take an artistic approach on things. Coz AI can't express certain emotions that humans can express. You know what I mean. 🐺 But making AI just do your whole job for you? I feel like that just takes out the point in it. 🐺 Like art is such a HUMAN thing. And if we make a system to take our human emotions and train and robot to express them. I feel like we are just k¡lling it. 🐺 We don't need AI music — ( Subtitled in English for clearer and convenient comprehension. Highly recommended to watch this FULL video for best context )

Yechan's strong opinions AGAINST Generative AI in the artistic space like music or art. #82MAJOR 🐺 Like AI has always been around. It's always been a thing. But it's different when it starts to take an artistic approach on things. Coz AI can't express certain emotions that humans can express. You know what I mean. 🐺 But making AI just do your whole job for you? I feel like that just takes out the point in it. 🐺 Like art is such a HUMAN thing. And if we make a system to take our human emotions and train and robot to express them. I feel like we are just k¡lling it. 🐺 We don't need AI music — ( Subtitled in English for clearer and convenient comprehension. Highly recommended to watch this FULL video for best context )

TEAM 82MAJOR🔥

22,478 просмотров • 21 дней назад

They are building an AI future with zero safeguards for human workers. Zero. Jobs will vanish. Corporations will ask why pay a human when a robot never sleeps, never unionizes, never asks for fair wages or benefits. This is not science fiction. It is policy and it is happening now. Unions, this is your wake up call. If you do not lead the fight to defend human labor, you will not have members to protect. No members means no funding, no influence, no purpose. If human jobs are not protected, human citizens will become human liabilities. We must defend the right to work, the right to earn, the right to live with dignity. Where are the safeguards? Where is the leadership? #AI #WorkersRights #TheTomRenzShow

They are building an AI future with zero safeguards for human workers. Zero. Jobs will vanish. Corporations will ask why pay a human when a robot never sleeps, never unionizes, never asks for fair wages or benefits. This is not science fiction. It is policy and it is happening now. Unions, this is your wake up call. If you do not lead the fight to defend human labor, you will not have members to protect. No members means no funding, no influence, no purpose. If human jobs are not protected, human citizens will become human liabilities. We must defend the right to work, the right to earn, the right to live with dignity. Where are the safeguards? Where is the leadership? #AI #WorkersRights #TheTomRenzShow

Tom Renz

32,341 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Andrew Yang reveals which jobs will NOT be replaced by AI “44% of jobs are repetitive, and those are the ones AI is going to decimate. Non repetitive manual jobs, like cleaning hotel rooms, will last much longer because robots struggle with unpredictable tasks and environments. The same goes for jobs like HVAC repair and electricians, especially with older buildings” “Non repetitive cognitive work will not be replaced, which is what you and I do on a good day. This includes entrepreneurial and creative work, as well as directing AI. If you look at a Microsoft report that came out a few months ago, the most resilient roles are things like sledgehammer operators or people who install flooring, very gritty, physical work”

Andrew Yang reveals which jobs will NOT be replaced by AI “44% of jobs are repetitive, and those are the ones AI is going to decimate. Non repetitive manual jobs, like cleaning hotel rooms, will last much longer because robots struggle with unpredictable tasks and environments. The same goes for jobs like HVAC repair and electricians, especially with older buildings” “Non repetitive cognitive work will not be replaced, which is what you and I do on a good day. This includes entrepreneurial and creative work, as well as directing AI. If you look at a Microsoft report that came out a few months ago, the most resilient roles are things like sledgehammer operators or people who install flooring, very gritty, physical work”

Mikli

646,904 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

Rohan Paul

120,739 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk says every job done at a computer is going like lightning. The last time this happened, the people it happened to came out ahead. Musk: “Anything that is digital, which is like just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning.” Most people in his position soften that. He said it on a podcast without hedging once. Musk: “Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations.” Computer was a job title before it was a machine. Rooms full of people working out by hand the arithmetic that kept aircraft in the air and put rockets past the atmosphere. The machines arrived and the title disappeared. Everyone who held it kept working. Dorothy Vaughan taught herself to program the IBM brought in to replace her section, then ran it. Katherine Johnson stopped doing arithmetic and started calculating the path to the moon. Musk: “But much faster.” Speed is the part everyone hears as the threat. It is closer to mercy. They spent years in limbo while an institution worked out what to do with them. Faster means less time waiting for permission to matter. The machine takes the part of your work that was already mechanical, the part you could write down as a procedure. What survives is the judgment about what is worth doing, which never fit in a procedure to begin with. The obvious objection is scale. Manual calculation was one occupation, and this reaches every screen in every industry at once. That same breadth is why the tools are everywhere. They needed an institution to put them on the new machine. Nobody is waiting on that now. The thing doing the replacing runs on a laptop and answers to whoever opens it. Musk gets called a doomer for saying this out loud. Telling people while there is still time to move is the opposite of that. The arithmetic left the building. The people who had been doing it went to the moon.

Elon Musk says every job done at a computer is going like lightning. The last time this happened, the people it happened to came out ahead. Musk: “Anything that is digital, which is like just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning.” Most people in his position soften that. He said it on a podcast without hedging once. Musk: “Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations.” Computer was a job title before it was a machine. Rooms full of people working out by hand the arithmetic that kept aircraft in the air and put rockets past the atmosphere. The machines arrived and the title disappeared. Everyone who held it kept working. Dorothy Vaughan taught herself to program the IBM brought in to replace her section, then ran it. Katherine Johnson stopped doing arithmetic and started calculating the path to the moon. Musk: “But much faster.” Speed is the part everyone hears as the threat. It is closer to mercy. They spent years in limbo while an institution worked out what to do with them. Faster means less time waiting for permission to matter. The machine takes the part of your work that was already mechanical, the part you could write down as a procedure. What survives is the judgment about what is worth doing, which never fit in a procedure to begin with. The obvious objection is scale. Manual calculation was one occupation, and this reaches every screen in every industry at once. That same breadth is why the tools are everywhere. They needed an institution to put them on the new machine. Nobody is waiting on that now. The thing doing the replacing runs on a laptop and answers to whoever opens it. Musk gets called a doomer for saying this out loud. Telling people while there is still time to move is the opposite of that. The arithmetic left the building. The people who had been doing it went to the moon.

Dustin

33,324 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

AI video is getting wild… but THIS is on another level. 🤯🎬 My colleague Nick Lentz just dropped his submission for the Higgsfield Action Contest, and it’s honestly one of the most realistic and cinematic uses of AI video I’ve seen yet. The nuance of the characters. The action. The subtlety of the shots. It feels like something straight out of a film. If you’re into AI filmmaking or just want to see where this tech is heading, you’ve gotta check it out. If you like it, drop a comment or give it a thumbs up and show him some love. 🔥 Here's the link where you can vote:

AI video is getting wild… but THIS is on another level. 🤯🎬 My colleague Nick Lentz just dropped his submission for the Higgsfield Action Contest, and it’s honestly one of the most realistic and cinematic uses of AI video I’ve seen yet. The nuance of the characters. The action. The subtlety of the shots. It feels like something straight out of a film. If you’re into AI filmmaking or just want to see where this tech is heading, you’ve gotta check it out. If you like it, drop a comment or give it a thumbs up and show him some love. 🔥 Here's the link where you can vote:

Everett World

23,075 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

dnap

18,638 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸 AI IS BOOMING FOR STOCKS, BUT REGULAR PEOPLE ONLY HEAR JOB LOSSES AND HIGHER BILLS Chamath’s point is basically this: that viral “stop AI progress” vibe didn’t spread because it was funny. It spread because a lot of people think it makes sense. He says Big Tech created a PR problem by making AI look like a rich-people money loop with deals, capital, and stocks going up. Meanwhile regular families hear a different story about higher power bills, job cuts, and their kids’ future getting squeezed. His fix is blunt: stop the billionaire flexing and start delivering measurable benefits people can actually feel. "Politicians have an incredible sense of self-preservation. It went viral [the Bernie Sanders video about stopping AI progress] not because it sounded so crazy, but because to some people it sounded rational and reasonable. We have a huge perception issue in AI. A small percentage of people benefit, and at the tail end of it everybody reads about what’s about to fall on their head, electricity prices, jobs, and their children’s jobs. Enough of the stupid haircuts, dumb watches, ugly clothes, and ostentatious displays of wealth, it has to stop." Source: Chamath Palihapitiya / The All-In Podcast

🇺🇸 AI IS BOOMING FOR STOCKS, BUT REGULAR PEOPLE ONLY HEAR JOB LOSSES AND HIGHER BILLS Chamath’s point is basically this: that viral “stop AI progress” vibe didn’t spread because it was funny. It spread because a lot of people think it makes sense. He says Big Tech created a PR problem by making AI look like a rich-people money loop with deals, capital, and stocks going up. Meanwhile regular families hear a different story about higher power bills, job cuts, and their kids’ future getting squeezed. His fix is blunt: stop the billionaire flexing and start delivering measurable benefits people can actually feel. "Politicians have an incredible sense of self-preservation. It went viral [the Bernie Sanders video about stopping AI progress] not because it sounded so crazy, but because to some people it sounded rational and reasonable. We have a huge perception issue in AI. A small percentage of people benefit, and at the tail end of it everybody reads about what’s about to fall on their head, electricity prices, jobs, and their children’s jobs. Enough of the stupid haircuts, dumb watches, ugly clothes, and ostentatious displays of wealth, it has to stop." Source: Chamath Palihapitiya / The All-In Podcast

Mario Nawfal

150,383 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Holy shit. Bernie Sanders just called for OpenAI to be broken up "AI is like a meteor coming." He's worried about: 1) "Terminator scenarios" where superintelligent AI takes over (!!) 2) massive job loss (literally ALL jobs, per his tweet) 3) what AI will do to us as human beings Interviewer: Do you think OpenAI and ChatGPT should be broken up? Sanders: I do, but it’s a deeper issue than that. We need to take a deep breath and understand—it’s like a meteor coming. We have to be prepared to deal with it in all its complexity. Economically, I worry about massive loss of jobs. And I worry about what it does to us as human beings: there are products being sold that say you don’t need to relate to a human being anymore; you’ll have somebody hanging around your neck—your AI buddy. In a country with a lot of emotional distress, I worry about how we maintain community and relate to each other. And then, with AI, we worry about super-intelligent systems that supersede human intelligence. One day the AI says to a human being, “Sorry, but actually no.” Interviewer: You worry about a Terminator-like scenario? Sanders: Something like that. ---- AISafetyMemes take: The Overton Window is moving FAST and the anti-AI backlash is JUST beginning

Holy shit. Bernie Sanders just called for OpenAI to be broken up "AI is like a meteor coming." He's worried about: 1) "Terminator scenarios" where superintelligent AI takes over (!!) 2) massive job loss (literally ALL jobs, per his tweet) 3) what AI will do to us as human beings Interviewer: Do you think OpenAI and ChatGPT should be broken up? Sanders: I do, but it’s a deeper issue than that. We need to take a deep breath and understand—it’s like a meteor coming. We have to be prepared to deal with it in all its complexity. Economically, I worry about massive loss of jobs. And I worry about what it does to us as human beings: there are products being sold that say you don’t need to relate to a human being anymore; you’ll have somebody hanging around your neck—your AI buddy. In a country with a lot of emotional distress, I worry about how we maintain community and relate to each other. And then, with AI, we worry about super-intelligent systems that supersede human intelligence. One day the AI says to a human being, “Sorry, but actually no.” Interviewer: You worry about a Terminator-like scenario? Sanders: Something like that. ---- AISafetyMemes take: The Overton Window is moving FAST and the anti-AI backlash is JUST beginning

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

69,471 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 SPIDER-BOT HITS U.S. ROOFTOPS TO SAVE ROOFERS’ NECKS This AI-powered robot climbs rooftops like Spider-Man, planting shingles with freakish precision using machine vision and winches. It anchors to the roof, hauls itself around with cables, and uses a mechanical arm to do the job most humans would rather not risk their necks for. The bot doesn’t need a lunch break, a ladder, or life insurance, and is poised to making roofing cheaper and safer forever. Source: TechCrunch, ByoTools

🇺🇸 SPIDER-BOT HITS U.S. ROOFTOPS TO SAVE ROOFERS’ NECKS This AI-powered robot climbs rooftops like Spider-Man, planting shingles with freakish precision using machine vision and winches. It anchors to the roof, hauls itself around with cables, and uses a mechanical arm to do the job most humans would rather not risk their necks for. The bot doesn’t need a lunch break, a ladder, or life insurance, and is poised to making roofing cheaper and safer forever. Source: TechCrunch, ByoTools

Mario Nawfal

432,237 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Dustin

787,827 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад