Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

A different perspective on AI and jobs — Alberta Tech's blunt take "Nobody’s replacing your job with AI just to wheel you around like a pampered princess in WALL-E. If AI takes everything, you’re not getting free hover chairs. You’re out on the street doing the one manual job... show more

Camus

451,559 subscribers

28,563 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

ELON MUSK: IF YOUR JOB INVOLVES MOVING ATOMS, YOU’RE SAFE. IF IT INVOLVES MOVING DIGITS, AI IS TAKING OVER LIKE LIGHTNING "AI is really still digital. Ultimately, AI can improve the productivity of humans who do things with their hands Literally welding, electrical work, plumbing, anything that involves physically moving atoms. Like cooking food or farming; anything that's physical, those jobs will exist for a much longer time But anything that is digital, which is just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning It's going to take over those jobs like lightning. Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations, but much faster"

ELON MUSK: IF YOUR JOB INVOLVES MOVING ATOMS, YOU’RE SAFE. IF IT INVOLVES MOVING DIGITS, AI IS TAKING OVER LIKE LIGHTNING "AI is really still digital. Ultimately, AI can improve the productivity of humans who do things with their hands Literally welding, electrical work, plumbing, anything that involves physically moving atoms. Like cooking food or farming; anything that's physical, those jobs will exist for a much longer time But anything that is digital, which is just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning It's going to take over those jobs like lightning. Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations, but much faster"

X Freeze

1,812,344 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 THE AI RACE ONLY MATTERS IF PEOPLE CAN PAY BILLS AI vs China sounds like a big-brain DC headline, but Jason Calacanis basically says most Americans don’t wake up thinking about “beating China.” They wake up thinking: can I keep my job, can my kid get hired, why are groceries still expensive, and why does tech feel like it’s replacing us? Then Chamath jumps in with the macro warning: the China fight is existential, but it has to stay in the AI/economic lane, and Silicon Valley needs to prove regular people get a dividend, not just higher stock charts. @jason: "Beating China does not matter to the average American. What they care about is jobs… their kids getting jobs… costs… inflation… energy costs going up. Half the country doesn’t own stocks, so they’re not participating in it. They’re hearing everybody talk about job displacement… and that’s a valid concern. If you lose your job and your kids can’t get a job, that’s existential." Chamath Palihapitiya: "The war with China is existential. If we can keep it on the battlefield of AI and intellectual and economic problems, we have a very good chance of winning. We need to start showing tactical artifacts that show that this is a dividend that can benefit everybody. We have so much cash on the balance sheets of these companies… Wall Street values it at zero… we need to start using that cash more effectively." Source: The All-In Podcast

🇺🇸 THE AI RACE ONLY MATTERS IF PEOPLE CAN PAY BILLS AI vs China sounds like a big-brain DC headline, but Jason Calacanis basically says most Americans don’t wake up thinking about “beating China.” They wake up thinking: can I keep my job, can my kid get hired, why are groceries still expensive, and why does tech feel like it’s replacing us? Then Chamath jumps in with the macro warning: the China fight is existential, but it has to stay in the AI/economic lane, and Silicon Valley needs to prove regular people get a dividend, not just higher stock charts. @jason: "Beating China does not matter to the average American. What they care about is jobs… their kids getting jobs… costs… inflation… energy costs going up. Half the country doesn’t own stocks, so they’re not participating in it. They’re hearing everybody talk about job displacement… and that’s a valid concern. If you lose your job and your kids can’t get a job, that’s existential." Chamath Palihapitiya: "The war with China is existential. If we can keep it on the battlefield of AI and intellectual and economic problems, we have a very good chance of winning. We need to start showing tactical artifacts that show that this is a dividend that can benefit everybody. We have so much cash on the balance sheets of these companies… Wall Street values it at zero… we need to start using that cash more effectively." Source: The All-In Podcast

Mario Nawfal

91,103 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang explains exactly how to make sure that AI doesn't take your job. "Your job has to be more than the task." If it is, he says there will most likely be more than enough work for you to do because AI will create more jobs than it destroys. Listen to him explain the difference between "jobs" and "tasks," and why this difference will have such a profound impact on the types of work that humans will do in an AI powered future. ---------- Joe: But don't you think there's many jobs that AI will replace if your job, particularly automation? Jensen: If your job is the task. Joe: So automation. Factory workers. Jensen: Yeah. If your job is the task, Joe: That's a lot of people. Jensen: It could be a lot of people. Yeah. But it'll probably generate, like for example, I'm super excited about the robots Elon's working on It's still a few years away. When it happens, there's a whole new industry of technicians and people will have to manufacture the robots, right? And so that job never existed. And so you're gonna have a whole industry of people taking care of, like for example, you know, all the mechanics and all the people who are building things for cars, supercharging cars, that didn't exist before cars. And now we're gonna have robots. You're gonna have robot apparels. So a whole industry. Because I want my robot to look different than your robot. ... Joe: Don't you think that will all be automated though? Jensen: No, not all of it. Joe: Don't think that'll be done by other robots Jensen: Eventually. And then there'll be something else. Joe: So you think ultimately people just adapt except if you are the task, which is a large percentage of the workforce. Jensen: If your job is just to chop vegetables, Cuisinart is gonna replace you. Joe: So people have to find meaning in other things. Jensen: Your job has to be more than the task. ---------- Link to the full conversation on YouTube below 👇

Jensen Huang explains exactly how to make sure that AI doesn't take your job. "Your job has to be more than the task." If it is, he says there will most likely be more than enough work for you to do because AI will create more jobs than it destroys. Listen to him explain the difference between "jobs" and "tasks," and why this difference will have such a profound impact on the types of work that humans will do in an AI powered future. ---------- Joe: But don't you think there's many jobs that AI will replace if your job, particularly automation? Jensen: If your job is the task. Joe: So automation. Factory workers. Jensen: Yeah. If your job is the task, Joe: That's a lot of people. Jensen: It could be a lot of people. Yeah. But it'll probably generate, like for example, I'm super excited about the robots Elon's working on It's still a few years away. When it happens, there's a whole new industry of technicians and people will have to manufacture the robots, right? And so that job never existed. And so you're gonna have a whole industry of people taking care of, like for example, you know, all the mechanics and all the people who are building things for cars, supercharging cars, that didn't exist before cars. And now we're gonna have robots. You're gonna have robot apparels. So a whole industry. Because I want my robot to look different than your robot. ... Joe: Don't you think that will all be automated though? Jensen: No, not all of it. Joe: Don't think that'll be done by other robots Jensen: Eventually. And then there'll be something else. Joe: So you think ultimately people just adapt except if you are the task, which is a large percentage of the workforce. Jensen: If your job is just to chop vegetables, Cuisinart is gonna replace you. Joe: So people have to find meaning in other things. Jensen: Your job has to be more than the task. ---------- Link to the full conversation on YouTube below 👇

Hans C Nelson 🗽

87,374 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The BeyHive takes things way too literal. “Beyoncé hates AI.” Do y’all realize AI is in everything? That automated reply from her site and CÉCRED’? Payment processing? That’s AI too. She doesn’t hate AI. She hates a specific type of AI, y’all just grouped them into one. It’s 2025. Hating AI without understanding it isn’t just ironic, it’s costly. Opportunities, jobs, side hustles, content, business tools, they’re all being shaped by AI. If you’re still treating AI like it’s just ChatGPT or robots, you’re playing yourself out of relevance… and income. It’s like hating the internet in 2010. AI won’t replace jobs, it will replace those who don’t know how to use it.

The BeyHive takes things way too literal. “Beyoncé hates AI.” Do y’all realize AI is in everything? That automated reply from her site and CÉCRED’? Payment processing? That’s AI too. She doesn’t hate AI. She hates a specific type of AI, y’all just grouped them into one. It’s 2025. Hating AI without understanding it isn’t just ironic, it’s costly. Opportunities, jobs, side hustles, content, business tools, they’re all being shaped by AI. If you’re still treating AI like it’s just ChatGPT or robots, you’re playing yourself out of relevance… and income. It’s like hating the internet in 2010. AI won’t replace jobs, it will replace those who don’t know how to use it.

IChooseViolence

419,696 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

Arjun Khemani

167,733 просмотров • 1 год назад

AI is not replacing jobs. There is a fundamental difference between a collection of tasks & a job. Job = U { Tasks, Judgment, Relationships, Context, Ownership} Few jobs are truly at risk of replacement by AI - these involve more deterministic IO (Input Output) execution e.g. data entry, QA, CS etc. Most jobs are resilient because: (1) Human principals (business owners) always seek to assign responsibility & blame to a human agent. (2) Deals get done not because of outbound spam but because of years of nurturing a relationship (showing up at conferences, events, meet-ups) (3) The physical world is messy AF. Humans read non-verbal & subtle cues which are only possible via in-person interactions. The midwits are right - AI is taking over tasks. In fact, if AI hasn’t taken over tasks for you then you’re doing something very wrong. If tasks are automated & workflows are changing, jobs won’t be lost. In fact, to manage the messy transition, humans will be more in demand than ever before. The data from Foundation Labs itself points to this (watch to the end of this rant)

AI is not replacing jobs. There is a fundamental difference between a collection of tasks & a job. Job = U { Tasks, Judgment, Relationships, Context, Ownership} Few jobs are truly at risk of replacement by AI - these involve more deterministic IO (Input Output) execution e.g. data entry, QA, CS etc. Most jobs are resilient because: (1) Human principals (business owners) always seek to assign responsibility & blame to a human agent. (2) Deals get done not because of outbound spam but because of years of nurturing a relationship (showing up at conferences, events, meet-ups) (3) The physical world is messy AF. Humans read non-verbal & subtle cues which are only possible via in-person interactions. The midwits are right - AI is taking over tasks. In fact, if AI hasn’t taken over tasks for you then you’re doing something very wrong. If tasks are automated & workflows are changing, jobs won’t be lost. In fact, to manage the messy transition, humans will be more in demand than ever before. The data from Foundation Labs itself points to this (watch to the end of this rant)

Rahul Mathur

10,664 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

They are building an AI future with zero safeguards for human workers. Zero. Jobs will vanish. Corporations will ask why pay a human when a robot never sleeps, never unionizes, never asks for fair wages or benefits. This is not science fiction. It is policy and it is happening now. Unions, this is your wake up call. If you do not lead the fight to defend human labor, you will not have members to protect. No members means no funding, no influence, no purpose. If human jobs are not protected, human citizens will become human liabilities. We must defend the right to work, the right to earn, the right to live with dignity. Where are the safeguards? Where is the leadership? #AI #WorkersRights #TheTomRenzShow

They are building an AI future with zero safeguards for human workers. Zero. Jobs will vanish. Corporations will ask why pay a human when a robot never sleeps, never unionizes, never asks for fair wages or benefits. This is not science fiction. It is policy and it is happening now. Unions, this is your wake up call. If you do not lead the fight to defend human labor, you will not have members to protect. No members means no funding, no influence, no purpose. If human jobs are not protected, human citizens will become human liabilities. We must defend the right to work, the right to earn, the right to live with dignity. Where are the safeguards? Where is the leadership? #AI #WorkersRights #TheTomRenzShow

Tom Renz

32,332 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

Rohan Paul

120,355 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Andrew Yang reveals which jobs will NOT be replaced by AI “44% of jobs are repetitive, and those are the ones AI is going to decimate. Non repetitive manual jobs, like cleaning hotel rooms, will last much longer because robots struggle with unpredictable tasks and environments. The same goes for jobs like HVAC repair and electricians, especially with older buildings” “Non repetitive cognitive work will not be replaced, which is what you and I do on a good day. This includes entrepreneurial and creative work, as well as directing AI. If you look at a Microsoft report that came out a few months ago, the most resilient roles are things like sledgehammer operators or people who install flooring, very gritty, physical work”

Andrew Yang reveals which jobs will NOT be replaced by AI “44% of jobs are repetitive, and those are the ones AI is going to decimate. Non repetitive manual jobs, like cleaning hotel rooms, will last much longer because robots struggle with unpredictable tasks and environments. The same goes for jobs like HVAC repair and electricians, especially with older buildings” “Non repetitive cognitive work will not be replaced, which is what you and I do on a good day. This includes entrepreneurial and creative work, as well as directing AI. If you look at a Microsoft report that came out a few months ago, the most resilient roles are things like sledgehammer operators or people who install flooring, very gritty, physical work”

Mikli

646,803 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

Rohan Paul

37,639 просмотров • 6 дней назад

AI video is getting wild… but THIS is on another level. 🤯🎬 My colleague Nick Lentz just dropped his submission for the Higgsfield Action Contest, and it’s honestly one of the most realistic and cinematic uses of AI video I’ve seen yet. The nuance of the characters. The action. The subtlety of the shots. It feels like something straight out of a film. If you’re into AI filmmaking or just want to see where this tech is heading, you’ve gotta check it out. If you like it, drop a comment or give it a thumbs up and show him some love. 🔥 Here's the link where you can vote:

AI video is getting wild… but THIS is on another level. 🤯🎬 My colleague Nick Lentz just dropped his submission for the Higgsfield Action Contest, and it’s honestly one of the most realistic and cinematic uses of AI video I’ve seen yet. The nuance of the characters. The action. The subtlety of the shots. It feels like something straight out of a film. If you’re into AI filmmaking or just want to see where this tech is heading, you’ve gotta check it out. If you like it, drop a comment or give it a thumbs up and show him some love. 🔥 Here's the link where you can vote:

Everett World

23,075 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 AI IS BOOMING FOR STOCKS, BUT REGULAR PEOPLE ONLY HEAR JOB LOSSES AND HIGHER BILLS Chamath’s point is basically this: that viral “stop AI progress” vibe didn’t spread because it was funny. It spread because a lot of people think it makes sense. He says Big Tech created a PR problem by making AI look like a rich-people money loop with deals, capital, and stocks going up. Meanwhile regular families hear a different story about higher power bills, job cuts, and their kids’ future getting squeezed. His fix is blunt: stop the billionaire flexing and start delivering measurable benefits people can actually feel. "Politicians have an incredible sense of self-preservation. It went viral [the Bernie Sanders video about stopping AI progress] not because it sounded so crazy, but because to some people it sounded rational and reasonable. We have a huge perception issue in AI. A small percentage of people benefit, and at the tail end of it everybody reads about what’s about to fall on their head, electricity prices, jobs, and their children’s jobs. Enough of the stupid haircuts, dumb watches, ugly clothes, and ostentatious displays of wealth, it has to stop." Source: Chamath Palihapitiya / The All-In Podcast

🇺🇸 AI IS BOOMING FOR STOCKS, BUT REGULAR PEOPLE ONLY HEAR JOB LOSSES AND HIGHER BILLS Chamath’s point is basically this: that viral “stop AI progress” vibe didn’t spread because it was funny. It spread because a lot of people think it makes sense. He says Big Tech created a PR problem by making AI look like a rich-people money loop with deals, capital, and stocks going up. Meanwhile regular families hear a different story about higher power bills, job cuts, and their kids’ future getting squeezed. His fix is blunt: stop the billionaire flexing and start delivering measurable benefits people can actually feel. "Politicians have an incredible sense of self-preservation. It went viral [the Bernie Sanders video about stopping AI progress] not because it sounded so crazy, but because to some people it sounded rational and reasonable. We have a huge perception issue in AI. A small percentage of people benefit, and at the tail end of it everybody reads about what’s about to fall on their head, electricity prices, jobs, and their children’s jobs. Enough of the stupid haircuts, dumb watches, ugly clothes, and ostentatious displays of wealth, it has to stop." Source: Chamath Palihapitiya / The All-In Podcast

Mario Nawfal

149,436 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Holy shit. Bernie Sanders just called for OpenAI to be broken up "AI is like a meteor coming." He's worried about: 1) "Terminator scenarios" where superintelligent AI takes over (!!) 2) massive job loss (literally ALL jobs, per his tweet) 3) what AI will do to us as human beings Interviewer: Do you think OpenAI and ChatGPT should be broken up? Sanders: I do, but it’s a deeper issue than that. We need to take a deep breath and understand—it’s like a meteor coming. We have to be prepared to deal with it in all its complexity. Economically, I worry about massive loss of jobs. And I worry about what it does to us as human beings: there are products being sold that say you don’t need to relate to a human being anymore; you’ll have somebody hanging around your neck—your AI buddy. In a country with a lot of emotional distress, I worry about how we maintain community and relate to each other. And then, with AI, we worry about super-intelligent systems that supersede human intelligence. One day the AI says to a human being, “Sorry, but actually no.” Interviewer: You worry about a Terminator-like scenario? Sanders: Something like that. ---- AISafetyMemes take: The Overton Window is moving FAST and the anti-AI backlash is JUST beginning

Holy shit. Bernie Sanders just called for OpenAI to be broken up "AI is like a meteor coming." He's worried about: 1) "Terminator scenarios" where superintelligent AI takes over (!!) 2) massive job loss (literally ALL jobs, per his tweet) 3) what AI will do to us as human beings Interviewer: Do you think OpenAI and ChatGPT should be broken up? Sanders: I do, but it’s a deeper issue than that. We need to take a deep breath and understand—it’s like a meteor coming. We have to be prepared to deal with it in all its complexity. Economically, I worry about massive loss of jobs. And I worry about what it does to us as human beings: there are products being sold that say you don’t need to relate to a human being anymore; you’ll have somebody hanging around your neck—your AI buddy. In a country with a lot of emotional distress, I worry about how we maintain community and relate to each other. And then, with AI, we worry about super-intelligent systems that supersede human intelligence. One day the AI says to a human being, “Sorry, but actually no.” Interviewer: You worry about a Terminator-like scenario? Sanders: Something like that. ---- AISafetyMemes take: The Overton Window is moving FAST and the anti-AI backlash is JUST beginning

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

69,471 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Dustin

786,739 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 SPIDER-BOT HITS U.S. ROOFTOPS TO SAVE ROOFERS’ NECKS This AI-powered robot climbs rooftops like Spider-Man, planting shingles with freakish precision using machine vision and winches. It anchors to the roof, hauls itself around with cables, and uses a mechanical arm to do the job most humans would rather not risk their necks for. The bot doesn’t need a lunch break, a ladder, or life insurance, and is poised to making roofing cheaper and safer forever. Source: TechCrunch, ByoTools

🇺🇸 SPIDER-BOT HITS U.S. ROOFTOPS TO SAVE ROOFERS’ NECKS This AI-powered robot climbs rooftops like Spider-Man, planting shingles with freakish precision using machine vision and winches. It anchors to the roof, hauls itself around with cables, and uses a mechanical arm to do the job most humans would rather not risk their necks for. The bot doesn’t need a lunch break, a ladder, or life insurance, and is poised to making roofing cheaper and safer forever. Source: TechCrunch, ByoTools

Mario Nawfal

432,141 просмотров • 1 год назад

OpenAI founder just said: "Jobs will go away. Jobs have gone away with every technological revolution. Jobs will change." The question is not if your job changes, it's whether you're on the right side of that change. The people adapting fastest right now are the ones who actually know what AI can do. Most don't and thinking AI won't affect you is already a losing position. That's why I put together a guide on what AI can actually do, the capabilities most people have never found. Read the post below and you'll already be ahead of 99% of people using AI right now.

OpenAI founder just said: "Jobs will go away. Jobs have gone away with every technological revolution. Jobs will change." The question is not if your job changes, it's whether you're on the right side of that change. The people adapting fastest right now are the ones who actually know what AI can do. Most don't and thinking AI won't affect you is already a losing position. That's why I put together a guide on what AI can actually do, the capabilities most people have never found. Read the post below and you'll already be ahead of 99% of people using AI right now.

Anatoli Kopadze

26,111 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The Laptop Test. Why most remote jobs will disappear within 10 years. Insights from an interview with Shane Legg, cofounder of Google DeepMind. A short clip, but it lands like a brick. Legg lays out a framework that quietly nukes a huge chunk of today’s job market. •The Laptop Test If your job can be done fully remote with just a laptop, screen, and internet, it’s pure cognitive labor. No physical presence. No embodiment. That is exactly the domain advanced AI will dominate. Conclusion: most remote, computer-only jobs are on a countdown. •Yes, humans still matter but less than we think Some digital work survives because people follow people. Influencers, creators, personalities. The value isn’t the task, it’s the human behind it. But that’s the exception, not the rule. •Experts are behind the curve Legg points out something uncomfortable: many academics and professionals seriously underestimate AGI. They judge AI by outdated capabilities, not by where it is actually heading. The pace of progress is faster than their mental models. •Why “normal people” often get it first Non-experts look at AI and think: it writes better, knows more, speaks more languages, solves more problems than I do. Why wouldn’t it replace jobs? Experts, meanwhile, assume their niche is too special. That belief is often more ego than evidence. Bottom line: If your income depends on work that lives entirely on a screen, you are not competing with AI yet, but you are on borrowed time. The question is no longer if, but how society adapts when this becomes obvious.

The Laptop Test. Why most remote jobs will disappear within 10 years. Insights from an interview with Shane Legg, cofounder of Google DeepMind. A short clip, but it lands like a brick. Legg lays out a framework that quietly nukes a huge chunk of today’s job market. •The Laptop Test If your job can be done fully remote with just a laptop, screen, and internet, it’s pure cognitive labor. No physical presence. No embodiment. That is exactly the domain advanced AI will dominate. Conclusion: most remote, computer-only jobs are on a countdown. •Yes, humans still matter but less than we think Some digital work survives because people follow people. Influencers, creators, personalities. The value isn’t the task, it’s the human behind it. But that’s the exception, not the rule. •Experts are behind the curve Legg points out something uncomfortable: many academics and professionals seriously underestimate AGI. They judge AI by outdated capabilities, not by where it is actually heading. The pace of progress is faster than their mental models. •Why “normal people” often get it first Non-experts look at AI and think: it writes better, knows more, speaks more languages, solves more problems than I do. Why wouldn’t it replace jobs? Experts, meanwhile, assume their niche is too special. That belief is often more ego than evidence. Bottom line: If your income depends on work that lives entirely on a screen, you are not competing with AI yet, but you are on borrowed time. The question is no longer if, but how society adapts when this becomes obvious.

VraserX e/acc

235,920 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Marc Andreessen: "The job is not actually the atomic unit of what happens in the workplace. The atomic unit of what happens in the workplace is the task." "A job is a bundle of tasks." “Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss.” "As the tasks change enough, then that’s when the jobs change." "Ten years from now, is your job title coder, or coder-designer-product manager, or is it just, ‘I build products,’ or is it just, ‘I tell the AI how to build products.’ Whatever that job is called, it’s going to be incredibly important, because the people doing that job are going to be orchestrating the AI." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky

Marc Andreessen: "The job is not actually the atomic unit of what happens in the workplace. The atomic unit of what happens in the workplace is the task." "A job is a bundle of tasks." “Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss.” "As the tasks change enough, then that’s when the jobs change." "Ten years from now, is your job title coder, or coder-designer-product manager, or is it just, ‘I build products,’ or is it just, ‘I tell the AI how to build products.’ Whatever that job is called, it’s going to be incredibly important, because the people doing that job are going to be orchestrating the AI." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky

a16z

292,928 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 DESANTIS: IF NEWSOM WERE A REPUBLICAN, YOU’D NAIL HIM TO THE WALL "Is it appropriate for people in your industry to create division and narratives? If Newsom were a Republican, you’d nail him to the wall for what’s happening. But because he’s a Democrat, you’re not as interested. In Florida, we just assume the media will politicize everything. Your track record on this is very, very bad." Source: CSPAN Ron DeSantis

🇺🇸 DESANTIS: IF NEWSOM WERE A REPUBLICAN, YOU’D NAIL HIM TO THE WALL "Is it appropriate for people in your industry to create division and narratives? If Newsom were a Republican, you’d nail him to the wall for what’s happening. But because he’s a Democrat, you’re not as interested. In Florida, we just assume the media will politicize everything. Your track record on this is very, very bad." Source: CSPAN Ron DeSantis

Mario Nawfal

1,665,748 просмотров • 1 год назад