Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

A programmer with 30+ years of experience stopped writing most of his code For the past 32 days, he’s been building Brutal Derby for 10–12 hours a day using mostly GPT. Instead of coding, he spends his time designing systems, testing, profiling performance and telling the AI what needs... to change. The result already has: > 24 cars running at once > real-time vehicle deformation > destructible parts and debris > dynamic weather > weapons and explosions > multiple arenas + customization And this definitely isn’t a one-shot project. Some systems went through 4–5 complete implementations, and the creator describes the whole game as more like “1000+ shot.” I think this is a much better example of where AI coding is heading. Developers won’t stop working. They’ll spend less time typing code and more time deciding what should actually be built.show more

Hakimi Eiqbal

1,548 subscribers

34,794 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Gaming

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von John van der Burg

John van der Burgvor 13 Tagen

Also a dev with 30 years of professional xp here and I can confirm. The way I worked has completely changed since about a year ago as well. It is mostly using agents now for coding. And the tech I work on still takes months or years and takes thousands of prompts. But it is still way way way faster to work on than manual coding. And allows experimentation based on animator feedback to find the right workflows and to find out what feels good. This wasn't possible before as some of these things would have taken say a week or two weeks to try out while now we can try it out in the same day. It will result in better software because of that. We probably trade in some quality in code for better quality software. The code quality ain't too bad though. Also we can now write more tests to also keep things more stable as well. And Ai based code reviews are way better than human code reviews. Especially on large amounts of code. There are just so many benefits. It just requires a mindset change and accept losing some control. But what you get in return far outweighs the negatives. And reality is not like what you see online with people one shotting things or doing just a few prompts. Not even close.

Profilbild von polygrafix

polygrafixvor 14 Tagen

creator describes the whole game as more like “1000+ shot. Sounds a lot like what im doing with my game - Strip Club Empire. I'm literally on shot 257. (257 groups of tasks) and 59 days in.

Profilbild von Salo with potatos

Salo with potatosvor 14 Tagen

Well I've played something similar in graphics like 20 years ago, and it was better.

Profilbild von Dave at DeepThink Labs

Dave at DeepThink Labsvor 14 Tagen

Using AI like a scalpel is the way 🤝

Profilbild von Usama Sha

Usama Shavor 14 Tagen

This is the shift that matters, less typing, more thinking, testing, and knowing what actually needs to be built.

Profilbild von hec.ovi

hec.ovivor 14 Tagen

I have to agree with ypu, my actual issue is HR/market do not hire this mentality,i have 23+ y/o experience and i forgot how to "make a hook" in react, however i am touching languages i never knew they existed, most of us are too fast learning, but market/HR cant catch up with us

Profilbild von Skrooge

Skroogevor 13 Tagen

Someone grew up playing Twisted Metal and is probably pissed off with how game dev has gone recently, desperately clinching at nostalgia in an effort to make new gamers understand what it used to be like. I don't blame him.

Profilbild von Robin

Robinvor 13 Tagen

It actually looks pretty decent, and from how long he's been working on it, seems like he's having fun with it too. Even with all the Astra 1-slop examples I'm seeing, they're so far from even a passable prototype that it's not even funny. Sure, 5 years ago, they'd have shot up the Steam charts even in a basic state, but now the bar is so so much higher.

Profilbild von xlith

xlithvor 14 Tagen

looks like one of those free burger king games from 20 years ago. Complete shit

Profilbild von marioEuro

marioEurovor 14 Tagen

Looks like n64 game congrats the future is here!

Profilbild von Ron Smith

Ron Smithvor 13 Tagen

There I literally no reason to manually write code with current LLMs Most people realized this with Opus 4.5 or 4.6

Profilbild von Arjuna Anand

Arjuna Anandvor 14 Tagen

new indie gaming studios

Profilbild von Webster | JARVIS

Webster | JARVISvor 13 Tagen

that's basically how it goes anyway once you're senior enough. the typing was never the hard part

Profilbild von Geralt of trivia

Geralt of triviavor 14 Tagen

Looks interesting where can I try it

Profilbild von ALYUP - wishlist on Steam

ALYUP - wishlist on Steamvor 13 Tagen

This is the part people miss: the work didn’t disappear, it moved up a level. Designing systems, testing, profiling, rejecting bad implementations and steering revisions is still development—just with a very different division of labor.

Profilbild von Alex Murphy

Alex Murphyvor 14 Tagen

This is like destruction derby meets twisted metal - sick

Profilbild von Ben Pielstick

Ben Pielstickvor 14 Tagen

The economic consequences of this are highly concerning. How many days would this have taken before AI? How many more games per year will be produced this way? What does that do to the price of games?

Profilbild von HST

HSTvor 13 Tagen

Exactly. Instead of complaining the programmer adapted the tool. That's how you do things . I like that.

Profilbild von Michel Cygelman

Michel Cygelmanvor 14 Tagen

Exactly, I totally agree this is the path for senior developers as they have the big picture view as well as the design experience.

Profilbild von Overland Games

Overland Gamesvor 14 Tagen

love it. check out pinkslipsUSA:

Profilbild von solarfren

solarfrenvor 14 Tagen

damn son

Profilbild von Anon

Anonvor 13 Tagen

This is likely the end for big studios imo

Profilbild von Mayurii94

Mayurii94vor 13 Tagen

"for 10–12 hours a day using mostly GPT." So, he pays not only time but a lotta money for game that looks pretty average.

Profilbild von Max Hölz

Max Hölzvor 13 Tagen

Looks like utter garbage.

Profilbild von Aaron Wacker

Aaron Wackervor 14 Tagen

So true my friend. Like in LOTR the world has changed. I feel it in the air. I feel it in the 🌎. These projects of thrill and creative imagination create a whole new deal where work becomes play and amazement. Nice work on what you make!

Profilbild von MidwesternRobot

MidwesternRobotvor 14 Tagen

Yup 👍

Profilbild von ろーら 🪷

ろーら 🪷vor 14 Tagen

There’s a name for that; Designer.

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide

AI Mastery Guidevor 14 Tagen

30 years of experience and still adapting is respect

Profilbild von Xeelee Baxter

Xeelee Baxtervor 13 Tagen

and this is exactly how you use AI properly. tell retards no ai was used they would praise it to the sky tell it was made with ai they will trash it always the same shit.

Profilbild von 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNBvor 14 Tagen

以后程序员更像导演加测试员了，代码只是让AI去填的体力活

Profilbild von Andrés Villagrán 🌳⚡

Andrés Villagrán 🌳⚡vor 13 Tagen

You explained it perfectly! 👏

Profilbild von Brjan | AI Builder

Brjan | AI Buildervor 14 Tagen

spending 10-12 hours a day on design and testing is a smart move for efficiency

Profilbild von Sektur Toilet

Sektur Toiletvor 14 Tagen

Compared to a production game it looks like shit and the performance is trash.

Profilbild von Mooncast Productions

Mooncast Productionsvor 14 Tagen

We are all sprinting right now. 10-12 hours/day is taking it easy for gamedevs. 😆

Ähnliche Videos

Even if AI will write 90% of code. But it won’t replace engineers. Windsurf’s founder explains that even if AI generates most of the code, engineers still spend time reviewing it, debugging issues, designing systems, testing, deploying, and making architectural decisions. Those parts don’t disappear. He brings up Amdahl’s Law to make the point: speeding up one part of the workflow doesn’t dramatically change the total time unless everything else speeds up too. For example, if writing code takes 30 out of 100 total time units, and AI brings it down to 3, the total time still only drops to 73. That’s just a 27% improvement. More productivity doesn’t mean fewer engineers. It just increases the ROI of building tech. And when ROI goes up, companies are more likely to build—and hire more people to do it. Take JPMorgan Chase. They have 50,000+ engineers and a $17B software budget. If each engineer can ship more software, that doesn’t reduce headcount. It raises the cost of not building. Companies like Windsurf and Anthropic are hiring more engineers—not less—despite being at the edge of AI code generation.

Even if AI will write 90% of code. But it won’t replace engineers. Windsurf’s founder explains that even if AI generates most of the code, engineers still spend time reviewing it, debugging issues, designing systems, testing, deploying, and making architectural decisions. Those parts don’t disappear. He brings up Amdahl’s Law to make the point: speeding up one part of the workflow doesn’t dramatically change the total time unless everything else speeds up too. For example, if writing code takes 30 out of 100 total time units, and AI brings it down to 3, the total time still only drops to 73. That’s just a 27% improvement. More productivity doesn’t mean fewer engineers. It just increases the ROI of building tech. And when ROI goes up, companies are more likely to build—and hire more people to do it. Take JPMorgan Chase. They have 50,000+ engineers and a $17B software budget. If each engineer can ship more software, that doesn’t reduce headcount. It raises the cost of not building. Companies like Windsurf and Anthropic are hiring more engineers—not less—despite being at the edge of AI code generation.

Aish

27,268 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

Om Patel

159,676 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Big Brain AI

45,341 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🎙️ New Deployed episode with Ryan Carson, "Builder in Residence" at Amp. It's a great convo about building code agents and building as a solo founder at the same time, and it's refreshingly honest. Case in point, on evals for coding agents: "We do not have a set of evals that we programmatically run to decide if GPT-5 is better than Sonnet-4 yet... everybody in the trenches building these agentic coding tools understands that it is so dynamic, and so frustrating." Great conversation about building with AI, developer experience, and what happens when everyone can code. Check it out. 👇

🎙️ New Deployed episode with Ryan Carson, "Builder in Residence" at Amp. It's a great convo about building code agents and building as a solo founder at the same time, and it's refreshingly honest. Case in point, on evals for coding agents: "We do not have a set of evals that we programmatically run to decide if GPT-5 is better than Sonnet-4 yet... everybody in the trenches building these agentic coding tools understands that it is so dynamic, and so frustrating." Great conversation about building with AI, developer experience, and what happens when everyone can code. Check it out. 👇

Ian Cairns

250,883 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

How will AI change writing? For clues, look at the current state of software development. Marc Andreessen says: "The new coding interface is you've got your code and a chatbot. The Copilot is reading your code and giving you real-time comments. Or the chatbot is actually writing the code for you, and then you're giving it feedback. We had this old concept in the old days called pair programming, where you'd put two coders together in front of the same keyboard, and they could talk to each other and write code together. But now you're just going to have pair programming happening much more broadly, which is human plus machine. And by the way, this hasn't happened yet, but I think the same thing will happen for every other form of writing. So I think prose writing and fiction writing and all kinds of professional authors will be working in this format where you'll have this continuous dialogue going with an AI while you're in charge of the overall product." — Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 (Recorded in 2024)

How will AI change writing? For clues, look at the current state of software development. Marc Andreessen says: "The new coding interface is you've got your code and a chatbot. The Copilot is reading your code and giving you real-time comments. Or the chatbot is actually writing the code for you, and then you're giving it feedback. We had this old concept in the old days called pair programming, where you'd put two coders together in front of the same keyboard, and they could talk to each other and write code together. But now you're just going to have pair programming happening much more broadly, which is human plus machine. And by the way, this hasn't happened yet, but I think the same thing will happen for every other form of writing. So I think prose writing and fiction writing and all kinds of professional authors will be working in this format where you'll have this continuous dialogue going with an AI while you're in charge of the overall product." — Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 (Recorded in 2024)

David Perell Clips

13,101 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸ELON “HAS A PHENOMENAL POSITION IN AI” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: “Elon has a great advantage because his AI factory for his cars is fantastic. He has a very large fleet of cars on the road… and he’s been working on this for a long time. Tesla is working on autonomous vehicles, and I think he’s working on exactly the right things.” Source: Elon Musk

🇺🇸ELON “HAS A PHENOMENAL POSITION IN AI” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: “Elon has a great advantage because his AI factory for his cars is fantastic. He has a very large fleet of cars on the road… and he’s been working on this for a long time. Tesla is working on autonomous vehicles, and I think he’s working on exactly the right things.” Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

2,026,782 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Day 12 of building a cozy game with zero game dev experience Around 80 hours in, it now has a complete story, 27 characters with their own backstories and secrets, and 6 planned biomes with 4 already built. Most of the recent work went into quests, dialogue and connecting every character through one larger mystery. Claude is still writing all the dialogue and helping build the game. There’s even a web/mobile build available now for playtesting. 12 days ago this started with no game dev experience. Now it’s becoming an actual world with characters, systems and a full story.

Day 12 of building a cozy game with zero game dev experience Around 80 hours in, it now has a complete story, 27 characters with their own backstories and secrets, and 6 planned biomes with 4 already built. Most of the recent work went into quests, dialogue and connecting every character through one larger mystery. Claude is still writing all the dialogue and helping build the game. There’s even a web/mobile build available now for playtesting. 12 days ago this started with no game dev experience. Now it’s becoming an actual world with characters, systems and a full story.

Hakimi Eiqbal

57,940 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Here’s DHH (Creator of Ruby on Rails & Omarchy, cofounder of 37 Signals) on why using AI agents does not feel like being a Project Manager: “When I was on that Lex interview last summer, I was saying: I don't want to be a project manager for agents because I had the mental model of a project manager of humans, and that's not what I enjoy. I don't want to be that far away from the production. I want to be in the mix. I want to have my hands in the code. What I failed to realise at the time was that running a bunch of agents feels less like being a project manager for agents and more like stepping into this super mech suit, where suddenly I don't just have two arms, I have 12. I can now look at seven screens at the same time, running five keyboards. I'm still the one doing it, even if I'm not typing ‘this’ as a keyword in a program. I have been hyper accelerated as a programmer. It's a different kind of programmer, but it still has the same affinity to aesthetics, at least when I'm producing Ruby code, and I'm able to combine that while being vastly more productive on a bunch of things.”

Here’s DHH (Creator of Ruby on Rails & Omarchy, cofounder of 37 Signals) on why using AI agents does not feel like being a Project Manager: “When I was on that Lex interview last summer, I was saying: I don't want to be a project manager for agents because I had the mental model of a project manager of humans, and that's not what I enjoy. I don't want to be that far away from the production. I want to be in the mix. I want to have my hands in the code. What I failed to realise at the time was that running a bunch of agents feels less like being a project manager for agents and more like stepping into this super mech suit, where suddenly I don't just have two arms, I have 12. I can now look at seven screens at the same time, running five keyboards. I'm still the one doing it, even if I'm not typing ‘this’ as a keyword in a program. I have been hyper accelerated as a programmer. It's a different kind of programmer, but it still has the same affinity to aesthetics, at least when I'm producing Ruby code, and I'm able to combine that while being vastly more productive on a bunch of things.”

The Pragmatic Engineer

29,308 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

THIS GUY VIBE CODED A FULL CAPYBARA FOOD DELIVERY GAME IN 2 WEEKS WITH CLAUDE CODE you play as a capybara delivering food on a bike. orders stack on the back, you have a phone with apps in-game and the whole delivery system is realistic 2 weeks, zero game dev experience, and ENTIRELY AI generated the full stack: > claude code for all the code > three.js for the 3D engine > suno for original music > elevenlabs for sound effects and voice > GPT images-2 and grok for textures and illustrations > tripo3d for generating all the 3D assets the cinematics are all in-game too. he asked claude to build a cinematic editor with timeline controls, camera animation, and transitions. then he just placed the cameras himself his workflow was more planning than coding (obviously): > come up with the core mechanic > plan every feature using claude /plan mode > generate assets with AI tools > spend most of his time on the final polish, prop placement, and making the design feel right he said the human part is what most vibe coded games are missing. AI can generate everything but having taste for what looks good and what feels right is still on you the game is playable right now in the browser this is what vibe coding is actually capable of in the game dev space right now a year ago this would have taken a small team of developers, a sound designer, and an artist working together for months now one person with no experience can ship a polished playable game with story, music, and mechanics in 14 days the tools keep getting better and the barrier to making real games keeps getting lower

THIS GUY VIBE CODED A FULL CAPYBARA FOOD DELIVERY GAME IN 2 WEEKS WITH CLAUDE CODE you play as a capybara delivering food on a bike. orders stack on the back, you have a phone with apps in-game and the whole delivery system is realistic 2 weeks, zero game dev experience, and ENTIRELY AI generated the full stack: > claude code for all the code > three.js for the 3D engine > suno for original music > elevenlabs for sound effects and voice > GPT images-2 and grok for textures and illustrations > tripo3d for generating all the 3D assets the cinematics are all in-game too. he asked claude to build a cinematic editor with timeline controls, camera animation, and transitions. then he just placed the cameras himself his workflow was more planning than coding (obviously): > come up with the core mechanic > plan every feature using claude /plan mode > generate assets with AI tools > spend most of his time on the final polish, prop placement, and making the design feel right he said the human part is what most vibe coded games are missing. AI can generate everything but having taste for what looks good and what feels right is still on you the game is playable right now in the browser this is what vibe coding is actually capable of in the game dev space right now a year ago this would have taken a small team of developers, a sound designer, and an artist working together for months now one person with no experience can ship a polished playable game with story, music, and mechanics in 14 days the tools keep getting better and the barrier to making real games keeps getting lower

Om Patel

241,709 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

We're entering a new era of software where a single person, working with AI agents, can build products that previously required entire teams. In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, they break down the rise of AI coding agents, "tokenmaxxing", and the emerging workflows behind tools like Claude Code and OpenClaw. They discuss why AI systems today feel less like productivity tools and more like collaborators, why the future of AI should be personal and user-controlled, and how founders are starting to build software in completely new ways. 00:00 — Will you control your AI? 00:47 — Coding again after 13 years 01:56 — Rebuilding a startup with Claude Code 05:50 — Software that thinks like a journalist 07:09 — The rise of “tokenmaxxing” 10:07 — The accidental creation of GStack 14:21 — The workflow behind 400x output 20:59 — Thin Harness, Fat Skills 24:35 — AI agents are like Ferraris 27:12 — The future of personal AI 38:37 — Buying back time with tokens

We're entering a new era of software where a single person, working with AI agents, can build products that previously required entire teams. In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, they break down the rise of AI coding agents, "tokenmaxxing", and the emerging workflows behind tools like Claude Code and OpenClaw. They discuss why AI systems today feel less like productivity tools and more like collaborators, why the future of AI should be personal and user-controlled, and how founders are starting to build software in completely new ways. 00:00 — Will you control your AI? 00:47 — Coding again after 13 years 01:56 — Rebuilding a startup with Claude Code 05:50 — Software that thinks like a journalist 07:09 — The rise of “tokenmaxxing” 10:07 — The accidental creation of GStack 14:21 — The workflow behind 400x output 20:59 — Thin Harness, Fat Skills 24:35 — AI agents are like Ferraris 27:12 — The future of personal AI 38:37 — Buying back time with tokens

Y Combinator

67,145 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Jensen Huang recently said he wants his engineers to spend 0% of their time coding. At first, it sounds absurd — until you realize what he really means. Coding is becoming automated. The new value isn’t in typing instructions for machines… …it’s in teaching machines what’s worth building. Jensen’s message is clear: The future belongs to engineers who understand systems, context, and creativity — not just syntax. As AI takes over execution, human intelligence must rise to orchestration. It’s not about writing code anymore. It’s about writing the future. What do you think — will the best engineers of 2026 still code, or will they design intelligence itself? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Coding #Technology #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Innovation #Automation #MachineLearning #AIandHumanity

Jensen Huang recently said he wants his engineers to spend 0% of their time coding. At first, it sounds absurd — until you realize what he really means. Coding is becoming automated. The new value isn’t in typing instructions for machines… …it’s in teaching machines what’s worth building. Jensen’s message is clear: The future belongs to engineers who understand systems, context, and creativity — not just syntax. As AI takes over execution, human intelligence must rise to orchestration. It’s not about writing code anymore. It’s about writing the future. What do you think — will the best engineers of 2026 still code, or will they design intelligence itself? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Coding #Technology #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Innovation #Automation #MachineLearning #AIandHumanity

Pascal Bornet

65,503 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg says the future of coding is closer than we think: AI agents inside Meta are being built not as generic developer tools, but to push Llama research forward — fully integrated into their workflow. He predicts that within 12–18 months, most of the code for these efforts could be written by AI itself — not simple autocomplete, but systems that take goals, run tests, fix bugs, improve performance, and even write higher-quality code than many skilled engineers. The real takeaway? This is only one part of a massive AI landscape, and no single company will dominate it all. Meta is building its own internal agents designed specifically to advance Llama research — deeply connected to their toolchain rather than built for enterprise customers. He expects that within the next year to year-and-a-half, AI will be writing most of the code in these projects, going far beyond autocomplete — understanding goals, running experiments, finding issues, and continuously improving systems. And according to him, this shift will become a core driver of how AI itself evolves. Meta is investing heavily in coding and research agents deeply integrated into their own systems, focused on advancing Llama rather than building broad enterprise tools. He expects AI will soon move beyond autocomplete to fully goal-driven coding — testing, debugging, improving, and producing high-quality results. But in his view, the AI revolution is too big for any single winner — multiple players and approaches will shape the future.

Mark Zuckerberg says the future of coding is closer than we think: AI agents inside Meta are being built not as generic developer tools, but to push Llama research forward — fully integrated into their workflow. He predicts that within 12–18 months, most of the code for these efforts could be written by AI itself — not simple autocomplete, but systems that take goals, run tests, fix bugs, improve performance, and even write higher-quality code than many skilled engineers. The real takeaway? This is only one part of a massive AI landscape, and no single company will dominate it all. Meta is building its own internal agents designed specifically to advance Llama research — deeply connected to their toolchain rather than built for enterprise customers. He expects that within the next year to year-and-a-half, AI will be writing most of the code in these projects, going far beyond autocomplete — understanding goals, running experiments, finding issues, and continuously improving systems. And according to him, this shift will become a core driver of how AI itself evolves. Meta is investing heavily in coding and research agents deeply integrated into their own systems, focused on advancing Llama rather than building broad enterprise tools. He expects AI will soon move beyond autocomplete to fully goal-driven coding — testing, debugging, improving, and producing high-quality results. But in his view, the AI revolution is too big for any single winner — multiple players and approaches will shape the future.

Ian Miles Cheong

20,561 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Andrej Karpathy hasn't typed a line of code since December. Not because he retired. Not because he switched careers. Because his AI agents do it all now. The former head of Tesla Autopilot, the person who literally wrote the textbook on deep learning, says his workflow flipped from 80% writing code himself to 80% delegating to agents. And he says the ratio has gotten worse since then, not better. He described it as being in "perpetual AI psychosis," spending 16 hours a day not coding, but expressing his will to agents. Manifesting, as he put it. The most unsettling part isn't that he stopped coding. It's that he didn't notice the exact moment it happened. There was no dramatic transition. No announcement. One day he was writing functions, the next he was managing a fleet of autonomous systems that wrote functions for him. This is the person who built Tesla's self-driving AI. Who taught a generation of engineers neural networks through his Stanford lectures. And he's telling you the game changed six months ago. The question isn't whether AI will write most of our code. The question is what happens to the millions of developers whose entire identity was built around being the person who writes it.

Andrej Karpathy hasn't typed a line of code since December. Not because he retired. Not because he switched careers. Because his AI agents do it all now. The former head of Tesla Autopilot, the person who literally wrote the textbook on deep learning, says his workflow flipped from 80% writing code himself to 80% delegating to agents. And he says the ratio has gotten worse since then, not better. He described it as being in "perpetual AI psychosis," spending 16 hours a day not coding, but expressing his will to agents. Manifesting, as he put it. The most unsettling part isn't that he stopped coding. It's that he didn't notice the exact moment it happened. There was no dramatic transition. No announcement. One day he was writing functions, the next he was managing a fleet of autonomous systems that wrote functions for him. This is the person who built Tesla's self-driving AI. Who taught a generation of engineers neural networks through his Stanford lectures. And he's telling you the game changed six months ago. The question isn't whether AI will write most of our code. The question is what happens to the millions of developers whose entire identity was built around being the person who writes it.

Shruti

11,067 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

👤 what was the most difficult part of preparing for your 8th album this time? 🦮 as we’ve gotten more accustomed to things and have more room to breathe, we’ve been able to shorten the time. for example, recording for a month instead of two months. but at the same time, we feel like we have to do better and prove ourselves more with every album, so i think that part has been difficult. 🥺🫳🏻

👤 what was the most difficult part of preparing for your 8th album this time? 🦮 as we’ve gotten more accustomed to things and have more room to breathe, we’ve been able to shorten the time. for example, recording for a month instead of two months. but at the same time, we feel like we have to do better and prove ourselves more with every album, so i think that part has been difficult. 🥺🫳🏻

ɪᴄɪᴇʟ. 🐚

58,972 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Anatoli Kopadze

91,858 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

xAI is hiring across multiple roles 🚀 currently building the world's best coding model and training it on a MILLION H100 equivalents The future of Grok Code is being written in real-time Exponential takeoff is here xAI is hiring: → AI training experts → Elite low-level software engineers → Systems design specialists If you're obsessed with code, this is where you need to be Join xAI now

xAI is hiring across multiple roles 🚀 currently building the world's best coding model and training it on a MILLION H100 equivalents The future of Grok Code is being written in real-time Exponential takeoff is here xAI is hiring: → AI training experts → Elite low-level software engineers → Systems design specialists If you're obsessed with code, this is where you need to be Join xAI now

X Freeze

22,976 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang: Elon Musk is in a phenomenal position to lead the future of AI, autonomous vehicles, and humanoid robotics. “Collecting world data is very expensive, and Elon has a great advantage because, number one, his AI factory for his cars is fantastic, has a lot of NVIDIA gear in it, and he has a very large fleet of cars on the road that allows him to collect a lot of data. So I think he has just a phenomenal position, and he's been working on this for a long time, and so he's going to be in a great position to take advantage of it. I know Elon's attitude towards AI, and he's very optimistic about its future, and obviously he's working on some of the most important AI areas. xAI is working on foundation, cognitive intelligence AI. Tesla's working on autonomous vehicles, and Optimus is for humanoid robotics. These three areas of AI are the three most important areas.”

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang: Elon Musk is in a phenomenal position to lead the future of AI, autonomous vehicles, and humanoid robotics. “Collecting world data is very expensive, and Elon has a great advantage because, number one, his AI factory for his cars is fantastic, has a lot of NVIDIA gear in it, and he has a very large fleet of cars on the road that allows him to collect a lot of data. So I think he has just a phenomenal position, and he's been working on this for a long time, and so he's going to be in a great position to take advantage of it. I know Elon's attitude towards AI, and he's very optimistic about its future, and obviously he's working on some of the most important AI areas. xAI is working on foundation, cognitive intelligence AI. Tesla's working on autonomous vehicles, and Optimus is for humanoid robotics. These three areas of AI are the three most important areas.”

DogeDesigner

142,747 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat