正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

ACTU President Michele O’Neil on fire annihilates ACCI CEO Andrew McKellar & his spin on Productivity & Wage Growth, questioning “where was the ACCI when productivity growth was higher than wages growth?” “Deathly silence”💥🔥#NPC

21,602 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

GregMarSci 💙 的头像
GregMarSci 💙1 年前

Oh man. She filleted him like fish. Thankfully, the ACTU always stands up for workers.

The Liberation Project 的头像
The Liberation Project1 年前

𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐄𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Scott Galloway, multi-millionaire professor, gives dire warning about the decline of American capitalism, expanding wealth inequality and far-right CEOs. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Hugh de Beer 的头像
Hugh de Beer1 年前

ACTU President O’Neil is on 🔥🔥🔥🔥 and just brilliant to watch 👏👏👏👏👏

Lele-from the river to the sea-all will be free 的头像
Lele-from the river to the sea-all will be free1 年前

My working life was in the manufacturing industry They give productivity targets and once you reach them, they give new productivity targets. Wage increases were never spoken of,..your job was your reward for reaching targets. Wage rises were always due to union representation

maimou 的头像
maimou1 年前

Here is a graph that hurts Andrew credit: @GrogsGamut

Maureen Hill 的头像
Maureen Hill1 年前

She was very good, McKellar was no match for her

BalfoyOG 的头像
BalfoyOG1 年前

She represented the best of unions and he represented the worst of business. He's a walking, talking, poster child for why the world needs unions.

💧Michael West 的头像
💧Michael West1 年前

Walloped!

Miss Polly 🖤💛❤️ 的头像
Miss Polly 🖤💛❤️1 年前

Michele O'Neil is a NATIONAL TREASURE ❤️PS. How the hell did those Non Compete Clauses ever come about? Obviously something the LNP were 100% on board with oppressing workers rights.

Bighead1883 的头像
Bighead18831 年前

Michele is well scripted on her brief Onya

RosaMaree 的头像
RosaMaree1 年前

A site to behold. Michele is a star! ⭐

相关视频

Had so much fun chatting with Greg Kaplan (Greg Kaplan) and Michael Brennan of e61 Institute about Australia's stagnant productivity growth and how to fix it. The 2010s saw Australia's weakest productivity growth in 60 years. It was in many ways a lost decade. And it's dragging on—unlike the US, we haven't bounced out of covid with strong productivity growth. We discuss the extent to which this is being (i) caused by frontier-wide factors; (ii) caused by Australia-specific factors; and (iii) simply an artefact of how productivity is measured. We also go into a bunch of specific ideas, like: - why it could be better to densify Canberra than Sydney/Melbourne; - what should Albo do if he was bullish on AI; and - what we can learn from the stunning innovativeness of Australia's agricultural sector. And we discuss deeper questions around the role of government—as it's not really clear what levers the government currently has over productivity (at least for its *growth rate*). Links below. Enjoy! Timestamps: (0:00:00) - Introduction. (0:01:47) - Why has construction productivity stagnated—in Australia and the West? (0:08:38) - Can housing supply meaningfully grow just by improving construction productivity (without planning reform)? (0:12:50) - If construction and regulatory bottlenecks ease, what becomes the new supply constraint? (0:21:49) - Would densifying Sydney/Melbourne deliver big productivity gains—or should smaller cities scale? (0:29:48) - The most important limitations of GDP as a metric. (0:34:29) - Growth accounting in ~8 minutes: capital, labour, TFP. (0:43:04) - Is there a single “north-star” metric for policymakers? (0:47:12) - Should policymakers care more about TFP or labour productivity? (0:52:11) - Why revenue per worker is an imperfect proxy for firm-level productivity. (0:56:00) - Do these measurement critiques change what policy should do now? (0:58:25) - Stylised facts about the Australian economy. (1:04:01) - Status update on the health of the Australian economy. (1:06:43) - What would it take for Australia to be the richest country again? (1:11:23) - What growth rates are realistically achievable for Australia? (1:15:24) - How much GDP do we forgo over 10 years if weak productivity persists? (1:16:23) - Services, Baumol’s cost disease, and measurement. (1:29:18) - Lowest-hanging fruit for quality/productivity gains in services. (1:35:29) - Australia-specific vs frontier-wide causes of the slowdown. (1:39:51) - Best/worst Australian industries for TFP (i.e. “MFP”) growth over recent decades. (1:53:18) - Why has TFP slowed across almost every industry? (The chart behind the slowdown.) (1:59:41) - What is Australia’s “single most productive” company? (2:01:43) - Which industries have the biggest gaps between frontier and laggard firms? (2:07:53) - Is the median US firm more productive than its Australian counterpart, or is the US average skewed by superstars? (2:10:10) - What would Australian management look like if we converged on US practices? (2:13:15) - Why has the US—almost alone among rich countries—had strong recent productivity growth? (2:15:11) - How much of the US–Australia TFP gap is “culture”? (2:21:21) - Minimum reforms needed to restore 1–2% annual labour-productivity growth? (2:24:38) - Beyond Sydney/Melbourne: building (or scaling) new cities. (2:28:59) - If you were Anthony Albanese and bullish on AI, what would you do? (2:31:21) - How important is the CSIRO to Australia’s TFP? (2:33:02) - Three sensible reforms: tax; carbon pricing; road-user charging. (2:40:46) - Are the 1980s microeconomic reforms overrated? (2:44:33) - What levers reach the productivity growth rate—or is lifting levels the only game? (2:49:54) - Are we too concerned about the reform era ending? (2:56:12) - Most non-obvious lessons from the reform era.

Joseph Noel Walker

128,950 次观看 • 11 个月前