Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

AI coding tools are great at generating code. But can an AI agent take a vague idea, understand the whole project, make decisions, write the code, run it, test it, and actually turn it into something usable? I put EvoX Agent through a real-world task to find out. Here’s...

13,586 Aufrufe • vor 15 Stunden •via X (Twitter)

38 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jay Bisen
Jay Bisenvor 15 Stunden

EvoX Agent goes beyond coding; it can research, analyze, execute, and create. It can turn complex tasks into structured workflows and handle them end to end. With reusable skills and multi-agent collaboration, it keeps getting more capable. One agent, multiple workflows, less tool-hopping.

Profilbild von Jay Bisen
Jay Bisenvor 15 Stunden

I gave EvoX Agent a challenge that went beyond simple coding: Build a realistic tornado animation with dynamic movement and effects. It figured out the logic, built the experience, and brought the concept to life without me having to manually connect every piece.

Profilbild von Jay Bisen
Jay Bisenvor 15 Stunden

I wanted to test EvoX on something completely different: Analyze BTC’s price performance throughout July. It processed the data, identified the key price movements, and turned everything into a clear, dynamic chart. Raw market data → actionable insights at a glance.

Profilbild von Jay Bisen
Jay Bisenvor 15 Stunden

Curious what EvoX can do with your own data? Turn raw information into clear insights, charts, and useful outputs. Put it to the test on your next project. Try EvoX Agent Beta ↓

Profilbild von Al Tech World
Al Tech Worldvor 14 Stunden

AI that can actually execute and validate its own work is a very different proposition from autocomplete.

Profilbild von Sanskriti Naruka
Sanskriti Narukavor 14 Stunden

Loved seeing EvoX turn a vague idea into a working tornado animation and a clean BTC chart that’s the kind of end-to-end agent that actually ships usable work.

Profilbild von Harsh Pawar
Harsh Pawarvor 14 Stunden

Definitely an interesting direction. The shift from “AI writes code” to “AI completes projects” is happening fast.

Profilbild von Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBackvor 14 Stunden

@JayBisen473370 I hit that roadblock building my own thing. Real challenge is balancing AI decisions with user intent. Curious how EvoX Agent handles this!

Profilbild von Minds That Build
Minds That Buildvor 14 Stunden

This feels much closer to having an AI teammate than having a simple coding assistant.

Profilbild von The Ant Philosophy
The Ant Philosophyvor 14 Stunden

The BTC analysis example shows how useful agents can be beyond traditional software development.

Profilbild von Daily Wisdom
Daily Wisdomvor 14 Stunden

“Less tool-hopping” is honestly one of the biggest benefits of this approach.

Profilbild von Life Mastery
Life Masteryvor 14 Stunden

The real test for AI isn’t whether it can generate code. It’s whether it can turn an idea into something that actually works.

Profilbild von Shweta singh
Shweta singhvor 14 Stunden

The combination of creativity and data analysis in these examples is pretty compelling.

Profilbild von Wise Philosophy
Wise Philosophyvor 14 Stunden

The ability to research, reason, execute, and iterate in one workflow is where things get interesting.

Profilbild von Amir Ansari
Amir Ansarivor 14 Stunden

Less switching between coding, research, analysis, and visualization could save a lot of time.

Profilbild von Apex Mentality
Apex Mentalityvor 14 Stunden

AI agents are becoming less about writing snippets and more about completing actual tasks.

Profilbild von Aiden Tech
Aiden Techvor 15 Stunden

Great share

Profilbild von marium
mariumvor 14 Stunden

That's a great question. Curious to see how EvoX Agent performed on this real-world task!

Profilbild von Mind Yeti
Mind Yetivor 14 Stunden

I like the idea of testing an agent with completely different types of tasks. That’s a much better benchmark.

Profilbild von Arish Ai
Arish Aivor 13 Stunden

There’s a big difference between an AI that writes code and one that can actually complete a task.

Profilbild von Ismail Khan
Ismail Khanvor 12 Stunden

Building a sustainable habit routine with rewards and fallbacks sounds like a solid test case. Can't wait to see the final output!

Profilbild von Holland Tech Marco
Holland Tech Marcovor 11 Stunden

That tornado demo is a surprisingly good stress test for an AI agent.

Profilbild von Amaxa AI
Amaxa AIvor 14 Stunden

This is the real test for AI coding agents—not just writing code, but understanding the goal, making decisions, testing, and actually shipping something usable. 🔥 If you want, I can also �⁠make it **shorter, �⁠more viral, or �⁠more natural for X**.

Profilbild von Meenakshi Yadav
Meenakshi Yadavvor 13 Stunden

The BTC chart example is a nice reminder that AI agents can be useful for data tasks too, not just coding.

Profilbild von Manish Kumar Shah
Manish Kumar Shahvor 13 Stunden

The real benchmark will be consistency. Can it produce reliable results across completely different projects?

Profilbild von Onil Coder
Onil Codervor 14 Stunden

Really impressive. Looking forward to what's next.

Profilbild von Edwin | AI Systems
Edwin | AI Systemsvor 12 Stunden

The interesting part isn't the happy path. It's what happens when the agent hits a flaky test or a bad assumption mid-run. Did EvoX recover without a human restart, or was it one clean shot?

Profilbild von Christopher Riley
Christopher Rileyvor 10 Stunden

That's great update

Profilbild von 0xZubair 🃏
0xZubair 🃏vor 10 Stunden

cool test to see if it can actually ship something

Profilbild von Maria Watson
Maria Watsonvor 12 Stunden

We’re moving from “AI can write code” to a much bigger question: “What can AI actually build and complete?”

Profilbild von Aiden Tech
Aiden Techvor 13 Stunden

Build it, run it, test it” is a very different level of AI capability than simply completing code.

Profilbild von Flix Muller
Flix Mullervor 12 Stunden

Feels like we’re getting closer to AI that can actually own a development workflow.

Profilbild von pushkar soni
pushkar sonivor 12 Stunden

It would be interesting to see the same agent take an existing project, find the problems, and improve it autonomously.

Profilbild von Roxo
Roxovor 12 Stunden

Noce share

Profilbild von peter
petervor 12 Stunden

Amazing share

Profilbild von shobhanai
shobhanaivor 12 Stunden

Great share

Profilbild von Mark
Markvor 12 Stunden

Great post

Profilbild von Dhruv kumar
Dhruv kumarvor 12 Stunden

This is the real test for AI. Most tools can write a snippet, but managing an entire workflow independently is a huge leap. Excited to see how EvoX Agent handled it!

Ähnliche Videos

Bash is all you need! Which is why I'm introducing my holiday project: just-bash just-bash is a pretty complete implementation of bash in TypeScript designed to be used as a bash tool by AI agents. Because it turns out agents love exploring data via shell scripts, even beyond coding. It comes with grep, sed, awk and the 99th percentile features that an agent like Claude Code or Cursor would use. In fact, Claude Code can use it for secure bash execution. In the package - A bash-tool for AI SDK - A binary for use by yourself or your coding agents - An overlay filesystem to feed files to your agent securely - A Vercel Sandbox compatible API, so you can quickly upgrade to a real VM if you need to run binaries - An example AI agent that explores the just-bash code base using just-bash - I imported the Oils shell bash compatibility suite and just-bash passes a very good chunk What is interesting about this codebase: It was essentially entirely written by Opus 4.5. Coding agents love bash and they are good at reproducing it. They are also great at text-book recursive descent parsers and AST tweet-walk interpreters. That said, it is, like, a lot of code and I didn't read it all 😅. This is very much a hack, but it also seems to be _really_ useful. I haven't really found anything agents want to use that it doesn't support and it's fast and secure (caveats apply). It doesn't have write access to your computer and the filesystem is given a root that the agent cannot escape from. Find it at Related: Our recent blog post how we migrated our data analysis agent to bash tools and achieved incredible quality improvements The video shows the example agent investigating the just-bash code base

Malte Ubl

125,326 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.

DegenCalls

20,124 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten