正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

AI doesn’t erase expertise, it compounds it. “Be really good at a particular field, and then AI is merely a turbocharger of your capability in that field.” History shows it’s always the experts who benefit first, then the tools spread and more people become experts. This is Jevons paradox... show more

a16z

937,824 subscribers

169,973 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

What exactly are AI agents, and how will they change the way we work? Aaron Levie, martin_casado, Steven Sinofsky, Erik Torenberg discuss: (0:36) What Is an Agent? Agency, Autonomy, and Feedback Loops (4:27) Task Specialization and Division of Labor in AI (6:04) Anthropomorphizing AI and Its Economic Impact (9:10) Predictions, Progress, and Recursive Self-Improvement (13:13) Hallucinations, Verification, and Expert Productivity (16:16) Tool Adoption, Experts, and Changing Workflows (45:55) Division of Labor, Verticalization, and New Roles in Applied AI (54:44) Platform Competition and the Application Layer

What exactly are AI agents, and how will they change the way we work? Aaron Levie, martin_casado, Steven Sinofsky, Erik Torenberg discuss: (0:36) What Is an Agent? Agency, Autonomy, and Feedback Loops (4:27) Task Specialization and Division of Labor in AI (6:04) Anthropomorphizing AI and Its Economic Impact (9:10) Predictions, Progress, and Recursive Self-Improvement (13:13) Hallucinations, Verification, and Expert Productivity (16:16) Tool Adoption, Experts, and Changing Workflows (45:55) Division of Labor, Verticalization, and New Roles in Applied AI (54:44) Platform Competition and the Application Layer

a16z

89,137 次观看 • 11 个月前

Box CEO Aaron Levie on the AI Adoption Gap Aaron Levie joins Steven Sinofsky, Martin Casado, and Erik Torenberg to discuss how AI agents will revolutionize work, the growing pains of building software for the agent economy, what Wall Street gets wrong about AI, and more. 00:00 Intro 00:51 Building software for agents vs. humans 02:10 Can non-technical workers actually use AI agents? 14:31 CFO/CIO pushback: the real fear of agents doing integration 18:39 Treating agents like employees and why it breaks down 27:35 Diffusion gap: startups vs. enterprises 42:53 What Wall Street gets wrong Aaron Levie Steven Sinofsky martin_casado Erik Torenberg

Box CEO Aaron Levie on the AI Adoption Gap Aaron Levie joins Steven Sinofsky, Martin Casado, and Erik Torenberg to discuss how AI agents will revolutionize work, the growing pains of building software for the agent economy, what Wall Street gets wrong about AI, and more. 00:00 Intro 00:51 Building software for agents vs. humans 02:10 Can non-technical workers actually use AI agents? 14:31 CFO/CIO pushback: the real fear of agents doing integration 18:39 Treating agents like employees and why it breaks down 27:35 Diffusion gap: startups vs. enterprises 42:53 What Wall Street gets wrong Aaron Levie Steven Sinofsky martin_casado Erik Torenberg

a16z

276,989 次观看 • 4 个月前

Expertise compounds in the age of AI. “The productivity of an expert is outpacing everything else.” Box CEO Aaron Levie says those who know how to frame problems, test outputs, and pull the right levers are extracting far more value from AI than anyone else.

Expertise compounds in the age of AI. “The productivity of an expert is outpacing everything else.” Box CEO Aaron Levie says those who know how to frame problems, test outputs, and pull the right levers are extracting far more value from AI than anyone else.

a16z

110,097 次观看 • 11 个月前

Steven Sinofsky on why it's hard for AI to diffuse through firms: "Algorithmic thinking is really, really, really hard for the vast majority of people who have jobs… If you were to go into any person and ask them to create a flow chart for a particular thing that they have to go do, they would probably fail at producing that flow chart." "So within any organization, say doing a marketing plan… one person probably understands and could document the flow chart. So if you put one of these agents or this coworking tool in front of people… their ability to explain to it what to do is really, really limited." "You're basically just developing the next abstraction layer for how people interact… at each level of the abstraction layer, [it's] been a highly skilled, very specific individual within an organization… and then the little parts they build become little toollets… and some people can stitch together and some can't." Steven Sinofsky

Steven Sinofsky on why it's hard for AI to diffuse through firms: "Algorithmic thinking is really, really, really hard for the vast majority of people who have jobs… If you were to go into any person and ask them to create a flow chart for a particular thing that they have to go do, they would probably fail at producing that flow chart." "So within any organization, say doing a marketing plan… one person probably understands and could document the flow chart. So if you put one of these agents or this coworking tool in front of people… their ability to explain to it what to do is really, really limited." "You're basically just developing the next abstraction layer for how people interact… at each level of the abstraction layer, [it's] been a highly skilled, very specific individual within an organization… and then the little parts they build become little toollets… and some people can stitch together and some can't." Steven Sinofsky

a16z

232,017 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is very true. AI integration is both hard and necessary for companies. And AI-native junior employees can drive this adoption. Earlier this year Aaron Levie explained with martin_casado on the a16z podcast how AI fluency is one of the most powerful skills a new grad can have. The real value comes from knowing how to make AI work inside an organization. Most companies, both large and small, are slow to adopt new technology. They need people who can explain what AI can do, show them how to use it, and help them move faster. If you are fluent in AI, you can be that person. You can walk into a company, spot the areas where AI can save time or create new opportunities, and make it happen. That is a wedge into your first job and a way to stand out from everyone else.

This is very true. AI integration is both hard and necessary for companies. And AI-native junior employees can drive this adoption. Earlier this year Aaron Levie explained with martin_casado on the a16z podcast how AI fluency is one of the most powerful skills a new grad can have. The real value comes from knowing how to make AI work inside an organization. Most companies, both large and small, are slow to adopt new technology. They need people who can explain what AI can do, show them how to use it, and help them move faster. If you are fluent in AI, you can be that person. You can walk into a company, spot the areas where AI can save time or create new opportunities, and make it happen. That is a wedge into your first job and a way to stand out from everyone else.

a16z

366,027 次观看 • 11 个月前

“ If you are AI-native right now, coming out of college, the amount you can teach a company is unbelievable.” New grads: AI fluency is a superpower and a wedge into your next job. Big companies move slowly. If you can teach them how to move faster with AI, you’ll stand out. Aaron Levie and martin_casado talk AI adoption, SaaS vs. AI-native models, org strategy, and more on the a16z podcast.

“ If you are AI-native right now, coming out of college, the amount you can teach a company is unbelievable.” New grads: AI fluency is a superpower and a wedge into your next job. Big companies move slowly. If you can teach them how to move faster with AI, you’ll stand out. Aaron Levie and martin_casado talk AI adoption, SaaS vs. AI-native models, org strategy, and more on the a16z podcast.

a16z

163,263 次观看 • 1 年前

Mirendil Co-Founder and CEO Behnam Neyshabur explains the path to self-accelerating AI: " When you think about what does a scientist or an engineer do, the main skill they have is get very deep in a domain... and build a very sharp expertise that accumulates over time." "As you kind of become expert in a domain, your expertise is becoming sharper and sharper in something that has a tiny bit of volume in the whole set of all possible things you could be working on." "And getting to that point, being able to get there is a capability that is needed to advance all areas of science." "What that view means is that you have to work on what does it take to direct a system toward like a particular angle and make fast improvement, and that's the self-accelerating AI technology." Behnam Neyshabur

Mirendil Co-Founder and CEO Behnam Neyshabur explains the path to self-accelerating AI: " When you think about what does a scientist or an engineer do, the main skill they have is get very deep in a domain... and build a very sharp expertise that accumulates over time." "As you kind of become expert in a domain, your expertise is becoming sharper and sharper in something that has a tiny bit of volume in the whole set of all possible things you could be working on." "And getting to that point, being able to get there is a capability that is needed to advance all areas of science." "What that view means is that you have to work on what does it take to direct a system toward like a particular angle and make fast improvement, and that's the self-accelerating AI technology." Behnam Neyshabur

a16z

54,735 次观看 • 1 个月前

We asked Aaron Levie to explain the AI Jevons paradox. Jevons paradox is the idea that as technology improves resource efficiency, the consumption of that resource may actually increase, not decrease. It's been cited as a reason why energy-efficient cars fail to reduce our consumption of fossil fuels, and why more highway lanes fail to solve traffic congestion. Here's Aaron's full response. We recommend a watch if you are interested in economics, markets and AI.

We asked Aaron Levie to explain the AI Jevons paradox. Jevons paradox is the idea that as technology improves resource efficiency, the consumption of that resource may actually increase, not decrease. It's been cited as a reason why energy-efficient cars fail to reduce our consumption of fossil fuels, and why more highway lanes fail to solve traffic congestion. Here's Aaron's full response. We recommend a watch if you are interested in economics, markets and AI.

TBPN

182,298 次观看 • 1 年前

Aaron Levie says agent-driven micropayments could create an entirely new business model for the internet: "We might have truly a completely different business model for the internet." "Now actually it's probably is a good business model. Because let's say you had paywalled, really proprietary data... You could actually imagine like there's maybe like a hundred million agents that would be tapping into that data for various use cases." "All of a sudden, a penny a transaction starts to make a lot more sense than it did when you were capped at... people that maybe was interested in your content previously." "We probably have new business models for tools and APIs... We probably want an agent to be able to have a budget and make any API call it wants, and all of a sudden you have this new revenue stream, which is like these agents showing up, just transacting on your system." Aaron Levie at Daytona Compute Conference

Aaron Levie says agent-driven micropayments could create an entirely new business model for the internet: "We might have truly a completely different business model for the internet." "Now actually it's probably is a good business model. Because let's say you had paywalled, really proprietary data... You could actually imagine like there's maybe like a hundred million agents that would be tapping into that data for various use cases." "All of a sudden, a penny a transaction starts to make a lot more sense than it did when you were capped at... people that maybe was interested in your content previously." "We probably have new business models for tools and APIs... We probably want an agent to be able to have a budget and make any API call it wants, and all of a sudden you have this new revenue stream, which is like these agents showing up, just transacting on your system." Aaron Levie at Daytona Compute Conference

a16z

91,087 次观看 • 4 个月前

David Sacks says the biggest risk of AI was described not by James Cameron in The Terminator but by George Orwell in 1984. “I almost feel like the term ‘woke AI’ is insufficient to explain what’s going on because it somehow trivializes it.” “What we’re really talking about is 'Orwellian AI.' We’re talking about AI that lies to you, that distorts an answer, that rewrites history in real time to serve a current political agenda of the people who are in power.” “To me, this is the biggest risk of AI... It’s not The Terminator, it’s 1984.” David Sacks

David Sacks says the biggest risk of AI was described not by James Cameron in The Terminator but by George Orwell in 1984. “I almost feel like the term ‘woke AI’ is insufficient to explain what’s going on because it somehow trivializes it.” “What we’re really talking about is 'Orwellian AI.' We’re talking about AI that lies to you, that distorts an answer, that rewrites history in real time to serve a current political agenda of the people who are in power.” “To me, this is the biggest risk of AI... It’s not The Terminator, it’s 1984.” David Sacks

a16z

16,353,159 次观看 • 9 个月前

For thirty years the people of this country have been repeatedly told that experts are the answer to any problem. Need to build more housing? Need to invest in infrastructure? Need to manage the currency? Don’t worry! An expert committee will be formed! And yet the record of governance by experts in that time is appalling. Can you think of a part of the state that functions better under these people? Perhaps the truth that our political class fails to grasp is this: running a country is not a matter for specialist expertise, it is a political exercise. Decisions must be made that balance and sometimes override competing stakeholders, not constantly embolden them. The terrifying truth about our obsession with expertise is that it has nothing to do with the experts at all. It’s about politicians who wish to shirk the responsibility of actually governing. Fine. If they don’t want to do it. We’ll find people who will. #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #PoliticalLeadership #Governance #BritishPolitics #PoliticalAccountability #PublicPolicy

For thirty years the people of this country have been repeatedly told that experts are the answer to any problem. Need to build more housing? Need to invest in infrastructure? Need to manage the currency? Don’t worry! An expert committee will be formed! And yet the record of governance by experts in that time is appalling. Can you think of a part of the state that functions better under these people? Perhaps the truth that our political class fails to grasp is this: running a country is not a matter for specialist expertise, it is a political exercise. Decisions must be made that balance and sometimes override competing stakeholders, not constantly embolden them. The terrifying truth about our obsession with expertise is that it has nothing to do with the experts at all. It’s about politicians who wish to shirk the responsibility of actually governing. Fine. If they don’t want to do it. We’ll find people who will. #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #PoliticalLeadership #Governance #BritishPolitics #PoliticalAccountability #PublicPolicy

David Starkey

13,958 次观看 • 5 个月前

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 次观看 • 9 个月前

Jim Acosta says all the Trump vanity projects should be torn down: Bring in a panel of experts to look at how the ballroom could be retrofitted so it doesn’t look like an eyesore and an embarrassment. And if that can’t happen, then you tear the whole thing down and start all over again. This is like the end days of Saddam Hussein that we’re seeing right now, with the way he’s trying to build things and take over projects down in Washington, D.C. It does not speak to somebody who is at all healthy.

Jim Acosta says all the Trump vanity projects should be torn down: Bring in a panel of experts to look at how the ballroom could be retrofitted so it doesn’t look like an eyesore and an embarrassment. And if that can’t happen, then you tear the whole thing down and start all over again. This is like the end days of Saddam Hussein that we’re seeing right now, with the way he’s trying to build things and take over projects down in Washington, D.C. It does not speak to somebody who is at all healthy.

Acyn

169,056 次观看 • 1 个月前

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on AI agents and trading: "Everyone thinks that this is going to be all great and my agent's going to be trading for me." "What happens with all technology is the early adopters do have an easier time." "You're going to get some early wins, possibly if you're doing some kind of agentic trading, because not a lot of people are doing it." "At some point, if everyone's doing it, it becomes almost like if you're not doing it, you're at a disadvantage." "It's kind of like when you're the first accountant that used a spreadsheet in the 80s. I can get all of my work done for my business in one hour a day. And it used to be 10 hours a day." "But eventually everyone kind of figures it out and you're back to a level playing field." Vlad Tenev on Basis Points with amit and Steven Fiorillo

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on AI agents and trading: "Everyone thinks that this is going to be all great and my agent's going to be trading for me." "What happens with all technology is the early adopters do have an easier time." "You're going to get some early wins, possibly if you're doing some kind of agentic trading, because not a lot of people are doing it." "At some point, if everyone's doing it, it becomes almost like if you're not doing it, you're at a disadvantage." "It's kind of like when you're the first accountant that used a spreadsheet in the 80s. I can get all of my work done for my business in one hour a day. And it used to be 10 hours a day." "But eventually everyone kind of figures it out and you're back to a level playing field." Vlad Tenev on Basis Points with amit and Steven Fiorillo

a16z

126,223 次观看 • 4 个月前

AI is not replacing the engineer, the accountant, or the lawyer. It is handling the first 80% so they can focus on the part that actually matters. Aaron Levie on the future of jobs with Casey Newton: "All of the expertise and domain knowledge is in that last 20%, not the text that got generated."

AI is not replacing the engineer, the accountant, or the lawyer. It is handling the first 80% so they can focus on the part that actually matters. Aaron Levie on the future of jobs with Casey Newton: "All of the expertise and domain knowledge is in that last 20%, not the text that got generated."

Box

1,035,719 次观看 • 3 个月前

"This really is the AI race, just like we went through the space race—and we need to win." martin_casado on why the current approach to AI policy is flawed—and what the U.S. should be doing instead.

"This really is the AI race, just like we went through the space race—and we need to win." martin_casado on why the current approach to AI policy is flawed—and what the U.S. should be doing instead.

a16z

33,739 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk explains why AI could be capable of discovering new physics. “You can think of intelligence like a compression problem. For any given field, it can be physics, or any field, you can distill things down to their most basic axiomatic elements, the things that are extremely likely to be true. And then, you can reason up from there to reach a cogent conclusion. I think if you apply that sort of first-principles compression to a field, and then you decompress it and contest the results against reality, then AI is capable of innovation and discovering new physics.” Town Hall in Philadelphia, October 18, 2024

Elon Musk explains why AI could be capable of discovering new physics. “You can think of intelligence like a compression problem. For any given field, it can be physics, or any field, you can distill things down to their most basic axiomatic elements, the things that are extremely likely to be true. And then, you can reason up from there to reach a cogent conclusion. I think if you apply that sort of first-principles compression to a field, and then you decompress it and contest the results against reality, then AI is capable of innovation and discovering new physics.” Town Hall in Philadelphia, October 18, 2024

ELON CLIPS

1,054,434 次观看 • 1 年前

Marc Andreessen: AI is an "80 year overnight success." "Something about AI causes the people in the field to become both excessively utopian and excessively apocalyptic." "What's actually happened is—in retrospect, an enormous amount of technical progress built up over time." "For example, we now know that the neural network is the correct architecture. There was a 60 or 70 year run where that was controversial." "Everything we're building on today sort of derives from the original idea in 1943. In retrospect, we now know that these guys were right." "They would get the timing wrong and they thought capabilities would arrive faster, or that they could be turned into businesses sooner, but the scientists who worked on this over the course of decades were fundamentally correct about what they were doing." "And the payoff from all their work is happening now." "ChatGPT hits, and then o1 hits, and then OpenClaw hits, and these are radical, overnight transformative successes—but they're drawing on an 80 year wellspring backlog of ideas and thinking. It's not just all brand new, it's that it's an unlock of all of these decades of very serious, hardcore research." "There were AI researchers who spent their entire lives—got their PhD, researched for 40 years, retired in a lot of cases, passed away, and they never actually saw it work." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space

a16z

48,205 次观看 • 4 个月前