Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

AI Is Replacing Programmers and Mathematicians—Fast Eric Schmidt predicts that within one year, the majority of programmers will be replaced by AI agents, and graduate-level mathematicians will be rivaled by models trained on mathematical reasoning. Why? Because both code and math follow structured languages, which AI can learn to... show more

Wes Roth

16,465 subscribers

31,686 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Wes Roth

Wes Rothvor 1 Jahr

Source:

Profilbild von The Rundown AI

The Rundown AIvor 2 Jahren

AI won't replace you, but a person using AI will. Join 500,000+ readers and learn how to use AI in just 5 minutes a day (for free).

Profilbild von Eddie Ho

Eddie Hovor 1 Jahr

Let's see how it develops. I don’t doubt AI will outperform on some coding and math tasks - but saying 'it will replace most programmers' skips over all the ambiguity, creativity, and human problem-solving that code and math require, imo.

Profilbild von Rediminds, Inc

Rediminds, Incvor 1 Jahr

It’s not just about replacement, but redefinition. Let AI tackle routine algorithms and verifications, while human experts focus on creativity, system design, and ethical guardrails. Those who design the workflows around these ‘math‑and‑code specialists’ will lead the next wave.

Profilbild von Markus Odenthal

Markus Odenthalvor 1 Jahr

Interesting. I agree with him that information and math is precise. But the problem is that language isn’t. I would even say it’s the total opposite 😅

Profilbild von Mick

Mickvor 1 Jahr

Let's see what happens. I don't think devs will disappear, they will simply all become prompt engineers. You still need someone to tell the machine what to do.

Profilbild von Vertex

Vertexvor 1 Jahr

The “consensus” is fucking STUPID and driven by greed, not science.

Profilbild von 🇯🇲🇧🇧 Eagles really the champs forever.

🇯🇲🇧🇧 Eagles really the champs forever.vor 1 Jahr

just another old man in the way. Glad im diving deep, the human race has no use to counterintuitive ai. We don't have to live in the negative timeline of this

Profilbild von AHMAD

AHMADvor 1 Jahr

I think at some point AI will be limited to the fact of how today's computing works digitally and start to self improve to work in analog world, (analog-to-analog) with a new form of processing principals Simpler than quantum computing, more power efficient than current computing

Profilbild von Tom Bennet

Tom Bennetvor 1 Jahr

One year? Please. The hype cycle's a beast 🚀. It’ll *feel* like replacement, but it’s really just… evolution. Like upgrading from abacus to calculator.

Profilbild von Permian

Permianvor 1 Jahr

"All watched over By machines of loving grace"

Ähnliche Videos

Eric Schmidt says we're on the verge of AI replacing most programming and math tasks these domains are scale-free and don't require real-world data — just compute "world-class AI mathematicians will emerge in the next year, and top-tier AI programmers within two"

Eric Schmidt says we're on the verge of AI replacing most programming and math tasks these domains are scale-free and don't require real-world data — just compute "world-class AI mathematicians will emerge in the next year, and top-tier AI programmers within two"

Haider.

83,137 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🇺🇸 EX-GOOGLE BOSS: AI WILL REPLACE MOST PROGRAMMERS IN A YEAR—SUPERINTELLIGENCE COULD ARRIVE IN SIX Former Google CEO, Eric Schmidt: "We believe that in the next year, the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI. Within three to five years, we’ll see AGI—systems as smart as the best humans. And in six years, artificial superintelligence—smarter than all of us combined. This is happening fast, and society isn’t ready." Source: Eric Schmidt vitrupo

🇺🇸 EX-GOOGLE BOSS: AI WILL REPLACE MOST PROGRAMMERS IN A YEAR—SUPERINTELLIGENCE COULD ARRIVE IN SIX Former Google CEO, Eric Schmidt: "We believe that in the next year, the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI. Within three to five years, we’ll see AGI—systems as smart as the best humans. And in six years, artificial superintelligence—smarter than all of us combined. This is happening fast, and society isn’t ready." Source: Eric Schmidt vitrupo

Mario Nawfal

1,458,345 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Math is code. And code is math.” Carina Hong CEO Axiom on why that idea matters for AI: “For centuries, mathematicians reasoned in natural language. But because of the Curry–Howard correspondence, a proof can also be a program.” “You can translate natural-language math into formal code using systems like Lean. Lean is both a theorem-proving language and a programming language.” “That means you can generate solutions as code and then formally verify them. You can even use the same system to verify programs themselves.” “This creates a flywheel of generation and verification, where AI can both write solutions and prove that they’re correct.”

“Math is code. And code is math.” Carina Hong CEO Axiom on why that idea matters for AI: “For centuries, mathematicians reasoned in natural language. But because of the Curry–Howard correspondence, a proof can also be a program.” “You can translate natural-language math into formal code using systems like Lean. Lean is both a theorem-proving language and a programming language.” “That means you can generate solutions as code and then formally verify them. You can even use the same system to verify programs themselves.” “This creates a flywheel of generation and verification, where AI can both write solutions and prove that they’re correct.”

Forward Future

23,748 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 FORMER GOOGLE CEO: SUPERINTELLIGENCE SMARTER THAN ALL HUMANS COMBINED WITHIN 6 YEARS Former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt: "In one year, most programmers and top mathematicians will be replaced by AI. In three to five years, we’ll reach general intelligence, systems as smart as the top human thinkers. Within six years, artificial superintelligence smarter than all humanity combined. Society isn’t prepared." Source: DeepCurates on IG

🚨🇺🇸 FORMER GOOGLE CEO: SUPERINTELLIGENCE SMARTER THAN ALL HUMANS COMBINED WITHIN 6 YEARS Former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt: "In one year, most programmers and top mathematicians will be replaced by AI. In three to five years, we’ll reach general intelligence, systems as smart as the top human thinkers. Within six years, artificial superintelligence smarter than all humanity combined. Society isn’t prepared." Source: DeepCurates on IG

Mario Nawfal

593,467 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Eric Schmidt says in one year there will be AI "super mathematicians" and combined with superior programming skills this will lead to AI scientists that will increase the slope of progress such that the country or company that is the first mover will have a monopoly on innovation for some time

Eric Schmidt says in one year there will be AI "super mathematicians" and combined with superior programming skills this will lead to AI scientists that will increase the slope of progress such that the country or company that is the first mover will have a monopoly on innovation for some time

Tsarathustra

90,346 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, offers a sobering view: The biggest technological shift in human history is happening, and almost no one is talking about it. Schmidt opens with a startling industry prediction: "We believe as an industry that in the next one year the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI programmers. We also believe that within one year you will have graduate level mathematicians that are at the tippy top of graduate math programs." He explains why this matters so much. Programming and math aren't just two fields among many: "Programming plus math are the basis of sort of our whole digital world." And the AI labs are already using AI to build better AI: "The research groups in OpenAI and anthropic and so forth… around 10 or 20% of the code that they're developing in their research programs is being generated by the computer. That's called recursive self-improvement." Eric Schmidt then lays out the timeline most people haven't grasped: "Within 3 to 5 years we'll have what is called general intelligence AGI which can be defined as a system that is as smart as the smartest mathematician physicist artist writer thinker politician." He gives this belief system a name: "I call this by the way the San Francisco consensus because everyone who believes this is in San Francisco it may be the water." But the truly unsettling part comes next. Once AI starts improving itself, humans become optional to the process: "The computers are now doing self-improvement… they don't have to listen to us anymore. We call that super intelligence or ASI… computers that are smarter than the sum of humans. The San Francisco consensus is this occurs within six years." And here's where Schmidt sounds the alarm. The conversation isn't keeping pace with the technology: "This path is not understood in our society. There's no language for what happens with the arrival of this. This is happening faster than our human that our society, our democracy, our laws will address." His closing thought captures why this matters: "That's why it's underhyped. People do not understand what happens when you have intelligence at this level which is largely free."

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, offers a sobering view: The biggest technological shift in human history is happening, and almost no one is talking about it. Schmidt opens with a startling industry prediction: "We believe as an industry that in the next one year the vast majority of programmers will be replaced by AI programmers. We also believe that within one year you will have graduate level mathematicians that are at the tippy top of graduate math programs." He explains why this matters so much. Programming and math aren't just two fields among many: "Programming plus math are the basis of sort of our whole digital world." And the AI labs are already using AI to build better AI: "The research groups in OpenAI and anthropic and so forth… around 10 or 20% of the code that they're developing in their research programs is being generated by the computer. That's called recursive self-improvement." Eric Schmidt then lays out the timeline most people haven't grasped: "Within 3 to 5 years we'll have what is called general intelligence AGI which can be defined as a system that is as smart as the smartest mathematician physicist artist writer thinker politician." He gives this belief system a name: "I call this by the way the San Francisco consensus because everyone who believes this is in San Francisco it may be the water." But the truly unsettling part comes next. Once AI starts improving itself, humans become optional to the process: "The computers are now doing self-improvement… they don't have to listen to us anymore. We call that super intelligence or ASI… computers that are smarter than the sum of humans. The San Francisco consensus is this occurs within six years." And here's where Schmidt sounds the alarm. The conversation isn't keeping pace with the technology: "This path is not understood in our society. There's no language for what happens with the arrival of this. This is happening faster than our human that our society, our democracy, our laws will address." His closing thought captures why this matters: "That's why it's underhyped. People do not understand what happens when you have intelligence at this level which is largely free."

Big Brain AI

633,137 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Emad Mostaque says by next year, AI reasoning models like OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek's R1 will run on smartphones and perform PhD-level tasks with 20 watts of electricity - equivalent to the human brain

Emad Mostaque says by next year, AI reasoning models like OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek's R1 will run on smartphones and perform PhD-level tasks with 20 watts of electricity - equivalent to the human brain

Tsarathustra

157,090 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AI is destroying the imagination and creativity of the human mind. Works of inspired art like this cannot be created in a world dominated by ChatGPT and OpenAI. People will lose the ability to write, imagine, and create. All art will become regurgitated slop, created and manipulated by technocrats and their Indian programmers. AI is training the mind not to think.

AI is destroying the imagination and creativity of the human mind. Works of inspired art like this cannot be created in a world dominated by ChatGPT and OpenAI. People will lose the ability to write, imagine, and create. All art will become regurgitated slop, created and manipulated by technocrats and their Indian programmers. AI is training the mind not to think.

Lilly

22,869 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, on why top programmers won't be replaced by AI, they'll be amplified by it: He starts with an observation about the existing hierarchy in software: "The very top programmers were worth 10 times more than the ones right below. There's something special about the mathematical reasoning skills of programmers." Rather than flattening that gap, he argues AI will widen it: "Those people will become more valuable, not less valuable, because these systems need to be controlled by humans at the moment. Those people will be capable of grasping the parallelization and the activities of this." To show what this amplification actually looks like in practice, Eric shares a story from a startup he's involved with. He was talking to one of the programmers there, who works on UIs, about his daily workflow: "He said, 'I write the spec of what I want and then I write a test function, an evaluation function. And then I turn it on.' I said, 'What time?' And he goes, '7:00 in the evening.' And I go, 'Okay. What do you then do?' Well, he has dinner with his wife and he goes to sleep." Eric continues: "I said, 'Do you wake up?' Said, 'No, I sleep very well.' 'When does it finish?' 'Oh, 4:00 in the morning.' And then he gets up, has breakfast, you know, does whatever he does, and then he sees what's been good." Eric Schmidt calls the whole thing "mindboggling." The story captures what amplification really means. The programmer isn't writing less code. He's producing a night's worth of work while asleep, because the machine is running on his spec, his tests, his judgment of what "good" looks like. The leverage belongs to those who can define the problem precisely, write the tests that matter, and recognize good output when they see it.

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, on why top programmers won't be replaced by AI, they'll be amplified by it: He starts with an observation about the existing hierarchy in software: "The very top programmers were worth 10 times more than the ones right below. There's something special about the mathematical reasoning skills of programmers." Rather than flattening that gap, he argues AI will widen it: "Those people will become more valuable, not less valuable, because these systems need to be controlled by humans at the moment. Those people will be capable of grasping the parallelization and the activities of this." To show what this amplification actually looks like in practice, Eric shares a story from a startup he's involved with. He was talking to one of the programmers there, who works on UIs, about his daily workflow: "He said, 'I write the spec of what I want and then I write a test function, an evaluation function. And then I turn it on.' I said, 'What time?' And he goes, '7:00 in the evening.' And I go, 'Okay. What do you then do?' Well, he has dinner with his wife and he goes to sleep." Eric continues: "I said, 'Do you wake up?' Said, 'No, I sleep very well.' 'When does it finish?' 'Oh, 4:00 in the morning.' And then he gets up, has breakfast, you know, does whatever he does, and then he sees what's been good." Eric Schmidt calls the whole thing "mindboggling." The story captures what amplification really means. The programmer isn't writing less code. He's producing a night's worth of work while asleep, because the machine is running on his spec, his tests, his judgment of what "good" looks like. The leverage belongs to those who can define the problem precisely, write the tests that matter, and recognize good output when they see it.

Big Brain AI

15,319 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

When mathematicians make breakthroughs, they hallucinate too. They reach beyond established results. But unlike AI, they’ve learned to tell a promising hallucination from a dead end. Number theorist Ken Ono on AI, creativity, and mathematical discovery. -- Timestamps -- 00:00:00 – Why predicting problem difficulty is so hard 00:00:27 – How mathematicians and AI both “hallucinate” 00:02:15 – AI as a copilot for mathematical discovery 00:04:00 – How AI helped reveal new formulas for primes 00:09:02 – The promise and peril of AI 00:15:22 – What makes a great mathematical question 00:17:54 – Teaching by making deliberate mistakes 00:21:22 – Will AI reshape the world like the Industrial Revolution?

When mathematicians make breakthroughs, they hallucinate too. They reach beyond established results. But unlike AI, they’ve learned to tell a promising hallucination from a dead end. Number theorist Ken Ono on AI, creativity, and mathematical discovery. -- Timestamps -- 00:00:00 – Why predicting problem difficulty is so hard 00:00:27 – How mathematicians and AI both “hallucinate” 00:02:15 – AI as a copilot for mathematical discovery 00:04:00 – How AI helped reveal new formulas for primes 00:09:02 – The promise and peril of AI 00:15:22 – What makes a great mathematical question 00:17:54 – Teaching by making deliberate mistakes 00:21:22 – Will AI reshape the world like the Industrial Revolution?

Epoch AI

18,095 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"i would be amazed if AI mathematicians don't transform the whole of mathematics" Lead researcher at AlphaGo, David Silver: it may take time, but AI systems are on the track to solve deep mathematical challenges like the "Millennium Prize problems" and ultimately reshape the entire field.

"i would be amazed if AI mathematicians don't transform the whole of mathematics" Lead researcher at AlphaGo, David Silver: it may take time, but AI systems are on the track to solve deep mathematical challenges like the "Millennium Prize problems" and ultimately reshape the entire field.

Haider.

36,385 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt: "there is no evidence that the scaling laws have begun to stop" and in 5 years AI systems will be 100 times as powerful and capable of reasoning in physics and math, leading to dangers such as cyber attacks, biological attacks, misinformation and new forms of warfare

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt: "there is no evidence that the scaling laws have begun to stop" and in 5 years AI systems will be 100 times as powerful and capable of reasoning in physics and math, leading to dangers such as cyber attacks, biological attacks, misinformation and new forms of warfare

Tsarathustra

57,358 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman predicts that this year, AI agents will start doing useful work like coding; in 2026, AI will help make major scientific discoveries; and by 2027, AI will enter the physical realm, enabling robots to create serious economic value.

Sam Altman predicts that this year, AI agents will start doing useful work like coding; in 2026, AI will help make major scientific discoveries; and by 2027, AI will enter the physical realm, enabling robots to create serious economic value.

The Humanoid Hub

155,182 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, shares a bold warning about how fast AI is moving 🤖 Here’s what he says could happen: •🧠 In 1 year: AI may replace most programmers and top mathematicians •🧬 In 3–5 years: We could see AI reach general intelligence, matching the smartest human brains •🚀 In 6 years: Superintelligent AI could emerge — more powerful than all of humanity combined His message is clear: “Society isn’t ready”

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, shares a bold warning about how fast AI is moving 🤖 Here’s what he says could happen: •🧠 In 1 year: AI may replace most programmers and top mathematicians •🧬 In 3–5 years: We could see AI reach general intelligence, matching the smartest human brains •🚀 In 6 years: Superintelligent AI could emerge — more powerful than all of humanity combined His message is clear: “Society isn’t ready”

Tansu Yegen

41,228 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Daniel Kokotajlo says companies are making AI more agentic by scaling RL (reinforcement learning) and connecting agents to various tools. by early 2027, these agents will be fully autonomous, superhuman coders able to replace human programmers.

Daniel Kokotajlo says companies are making AI more agentic by scaling RL (reinforcement learning) and connecting agents to various tools. by early 2027, these agents will be fully autonomous, superhuman coders able to replace human programmers.

Haider.

11,559 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

the best programmers are the ones that can adapt and constantly learn / progress while everything is changing around them for CJ (Coding Garden) - 2026 will be the year of "just enough AI"™️, less hype, less FOMO, more building / shipping

the best programmers are the ones that can adapt and constantly learn / progress while everything is changing around them for CJ (Coding Garden) - 2026 will be the year of "just enough AI"™️, less hype, less FOMO, more building / shipping

Syntax

23,630 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt: OpenAI and Google are creating millions of AI software programmers who never tire and only require electricity As AI gets closer to superintelligence, progress speeds up fast. the first to reach it will have a massive lead, with the power to reshape the world or eliminate competitors.

Former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt: OpenAI and Google are creating millions of AI software programmers who never tire and only require electricity As AI gets closer to superintelligence, progress speeds up fast. the first to reach it will have a massive lead, with the power to reshape the world or eliminate competitors.

Haider.

83,839 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt drops a stark warning: The AI revolution is underhyped—and we're nowhere near ready. In the next year: AI programmers replacing human coders. AI mathematicians rivaling top grad students. This isn't chatbots—it's reasoning/planning systems we've never seen. Superintelligence (smarter than humans) could arrive within a decade, and America must get there first. The real crisis? Energy. AI needs massive computation → massive power. - Planning 10-gigawatt data centers (10× average U.S. nuclear plant's output). - Estimates: +29 GW needed by 2027, +67 GW by 2030 (equivalent to dozens of new nuclear plants—while we're building almost none). Schmidt: "We need energy in all forms... renewable, non-renewable, whatever. It needs to be there, and quickly." Fusion won't save us in time. Clip from this 2:46 high-stakes talk—ex-Google boss sounding the alarm on the AI energy crunch. Is the U.S. sleepwalking into an AI power crisis? Or will they finally build the infrastructure to win the race? Your thoughts—seriously, drop them below.

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt drops a stark warning: The AI revolution is underhyped—and we're nowhere near ready. In the next year: AI programmers replacing human coders. AI mathematicians rivaling top grad students. This isn't chatbots—it's reasoning/planning systems we've never seen. Superintelligence (smarter than humans) could arrive within a decade, and America must get there first. The real crisis? Energy. AI needs massive computation → massive power. - Planning 10-gigawatt data centers (10× average U.S. nuclear plant's output). - Estimates: +29 GW needed by 2027, +67 GW by 2030 (equivalent to dozens of new nuclear plants—while we're building almost none). Schmidt: "We need energy in all forms... renewable, non-renewable, whatever. It needs to be there, and quickly." Fusion won't save us in time. Clip from this 2:46 high-stakes talk—ex-Google boss sounding the alarm on the AI energy crunch. Is the U.S. sleepwalking into an AI power crisis? Or will they finally build the infrastructure to win the race? Your thoughts—seriously, drop them below.

Camus

54,450 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten