Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

AI IS THE FRANKENSTEIN BRAIN THAT ATE THE INTERNET It devours mountains of data like Pac-Man on a sugar rush, spotting patterns faster than a casino card counter on caffeine. Every mistake is fuel, rewiring itself until it’s smarter than a million Einsteins locked in a server room with... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,301,058 subscribers

27,560 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Sergey Brin says AI is a bigger breakthrough than the internet the internet, like money, was a shared system that helped people trade and build global networks. but it didn’t test the limits of the universe. AI does — because we don’t know how far intelligence can go

Sergey Brin says AI is a bigger breakthrough than the internet the internet, like money, was a shared system that helped people trade and build global networks. but it didn’t test the limits of the universe. AI does — because we don’t know how far intelligence can go

Haider.

112,595 views • 1 year ago

Larry Ellison just told every AI company on Earth they’re fighting the wrong war. The entire industry is racing to build the smartest model. More parameters. Better benchmarks. Faster inference. Ellison isn’t building a model. He’s controlling what every model needs to be useful. Every frontier AI trains on the same public internet. Same scraped pages. Same recycled text. When everyone has the same data, it’s not an advantage. It’s a floor. The only data that creates separation is private. Medical records. Financial models. Defense systems. Proprietary research locked behind firewalls for decades. That data already lives inside Oracle databases. Not Google’s. Not Microsoft’s. Not Amazon’s. Ellison didn’t enter the model war. He positioned himself above it. He rebuilt the database so AI can reason on private data without ever absorbing it. Training folds your data into the model permanently. Once it’s in, it never comes back out. Reasoning thinks with your data and hands back only the answer. The data never moves. One is surrender. The other is sovereignty. Ellison: “These are remarkable electronic brains.” He didn’t build the brain. He owns what the brain needs to think. Everyone is building the most powerful mind in human history. A mind is only as valuable as what it’s allowed to know. Own the knowledge and it doesn’t matter who builds the brain. That pattern has held through every era of human civilization. AI doesn’t break it. It proves it.

Larry Ellison just told every AI company on Earth they’re fighting the wrong war. The entire industry is racing to build the smartest model. More parameters. Better benchmarks. Faster inference. Ellison isn’t building a model. He’s controlling what every model needs to be useful. Every frontier AI trains on the same public internet. Same scraped pages. Same recycled text. When everyone has the same data, it’s not an advantage. It’s a floor. The only data that creates separation is private. Medical records. Financial models. Defense systems. Proprietary research locked behind firewalls for decades. That data already lives inside Oracle databases. Not Google’s. Not Microsoft’s. Not Amazon’s. Ellison didn’t enter the model war. He positioned himself above it. He rebuilt the database so AI can reason on private data without ever absorbing it. Training folds your data into the model permanently. Once it’s in, it never comes back out. Reasoning thinks with your data and hands back only the answer. The data never moves. One is surrender. The other is sovereignty. Ellison: “These are remarkable electronic brains.” He didn’t build the brain. He owns what the brain needs to think. Everyone is building the most powerful mind in human history. A mind is only as valuable as what it’s allowed to know. Own the knowledge and it doesn’t matter who builds the brain. That pattern has held through every era of human civilization. AI doesn’t break it. It proves it.

Dustin

97,673 views • 1 month ago

“Italian brainrot” is taking over the Internet Imagine a universe of AI-generated characters with vaguely Italian sounding names and nearly unintelligible storylines It’s like Cocomelon for adults

“Italian brainrot” is taking over the Internet Imagine a universe of AI-generated characters with vaguely Italian sounding names and nearly unintelligible storylines It’s like Cocomelon for adults

Olivia Moore

85,665 views • 1 year ago

.Elon Musk on AI in 2015: "A huge server bank with an intelligence that's vastly greater than a human... Its eyes and ears would be everywhere, every camera, every microphone, every device... It is unlikely that we will remain in charge of the planet."

.Elon Musk on AI in 2015: "A huge server bank with an intelligence that's vastly greater than a human... Its eyes and ears would be everywhere, every camera, every microphone, every device... It is unlikely that we will remain in charge of the planet."

KanekoaTheGreat

2,597,285 views • 3 years ago

Elon Musk just said AI will be smarter than every human on Earth combined within five years. Musk: “I think we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year.” Not a decade from now. Not five years. Months. Musk: “No later than next year.” He wasn’t finished. Musk: “Probably by 2030 or 2031, call it five years from now, AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.” Every mind that has ever existed, fused into one, and still slower than what’s coming. The man just described the end of human intellectual supremacy and the only response in the room was “Wow.” This is how civilizations miss the moment. Not with resistance. With manners. Musk isn’t guessing from a stage. He runs the AI company. He sees the acceleration that hasn’t gone public yet. This isn’t prediction. It’s reporting. The human brain was built for straight lines. Growth that compounds doesn’t register until it’s already past you. You can see an exponential curve on a chart. You cannot feel it while you’re standing on it. And there’s a deeper problem no one talks about. We have no way to measure an intelligence greater than our own. We can know something is smarter. We cannot understand how it thinks. A mind built on pattern recognition cannot recognize patterns it was never designed to see. The moments that change everything never feel like it to the people living through them. This one won’t either.

Elon Musk just said AI will be smarter than every human on Earth combined within five years. Musk: “I think we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year.” Not a decade from now. Not five years. Months. Musk: “No later than next year.” He wasn’t finished. Musk: “Probably by 2030 or 2031, call it five years from now, AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.” Every mind that has ever existed, fused into one, and still slower than what’s coming. The man just described the end of human intellectual supremacy and the only response in the room was “Wow.” This is how civilizations miss the moment. Not with resistance. With manners. Musk isn’t guessing from a stage. He runs the AI company. He sees the acceleration that hasn’t gone public yet. This isn’t prediction. It’s reporting. The human brain was built for straight lines. Growth that compounds doesn’t register until it’s already past you. You can see an exponential curve on a chart. You cannot feel it while you’re standing on it. And there’s a deeper problem no one talks about. We have no way to measure an intelligence greater than our own. We can know something is smarter. We cannot understand how it thinks. A mind built on pattern recognition cannot recognize patterns it was never designed to see. The moments that change everything never feel like it to the people living through them. This one won’t either.

Dustin

84,189 views • 3 months ago

Despite spending millions to hide the gory aftermath, my Nikon captured everything, thanks to Mike Rude up in the mountains. The CFIA has exposed itself on the world stage. The detailed video of those animals post-slaughter has reached more than 100 million people worldwide, shared and reposted across every major platform. This isn’t something the CFIA can come back from. A picture is worth a thousand words and once it’s on the internet, it’s there forever.

Despite spending millions to hide the gory aftermath, my Nikon captured everything, thanks to Mike Rude up in the mountains. The CFIA has exposed itself on the world stage. The detailed video of those animals post-slaughter has reached more than 100 million people worldwide, shared and reposted across every major platform. This isn’t something the CFIA can come back from. A picture is worth a thousand words and once it’s on the internet, it’s there forever.

Dave Freedom

19,040 views • 8 months ago

$Elon Musk just put a number on the flaw at the center of Nvidia’s empire. Wall Street has not done the math yet. Nvidia’s Blackwell is the most sought-after silicon on Earth. Every AI lab wants it. Every sovereign nation is bidding for it. Blackwell runs every model, for every company, in every data center on the planet. That universality built the empire. It is also the fracture point. Musk: “We believe the AI5 chip will be about a third of the power of an Nvidia Blackwell for roughly comparable performance. And much less than 10% of the cost.” One-third the power. Comparable performance. Less than ten percent of the cost. Musk: “This is a chip that is very much optimized for the Tesla AI software stack. It’s not meant to be a general purpose chip.” Nvidia builds silicon that serves a million different customers. Every transistor spent on universal compatibility is a transistor not dedicated to one task. Tesla is building silicon for exactly one customer. Itself. When you strip away every function you will never call, you do not get a lesser chip. You get a weapon. Here is what the market refuses to see. Data centers drink unlimited power from the grid. Robots run on batteries. Musk: “In order to have a functional robot, you have to have a great AI chip. And it needs to be an inexpensive chip and it needs to be very power efficient.” You cannot put a Blackwell inside a walking machine. It would drain the battery before it crossed the room. The entire AI revolution lives inside air-conditioned buildings bolted to the electrical grid. Musk is not competing for that market. He is engineering the silicon that survives outside of it. One-third the power is not a spec sheet footnote. It is the physics threshold that severs intelligence from the wall socket. Without that number, every robot on Earth stays tethered. With it, the algorithm walks. Less than ten percent of the cost is not a pricing strategy. It is the line where a machine brain stops being a capital expenditure and becomes a commodity component. When the chip inside a humanoid costs less than the motors in its legs, you do not manufacture hundreds of robots. You manufacture millions. Wall Street is valuing the AI revolution by who dominates the data center. Musk is building the only silicon designed to leave one. Nvidia built the brain of the cloud. Musk is building the brain of the physical world. No one has priced that in yet.$

Elon Musk just put a number on the flaw at the center of Nvidia’s empire. Wall Street has not done the math yet. Nvidia’s Blackwell is the most sought-after silicon on Earth. Every AI lab wants it. Every sovereign nation is bidding for it. Blackwell runs every model, for every company, in every data center on the planet. That universality built the empire. It is also the fracture point. Musk: “We believe the AI5 chip will be about a third of the power of an Nvidia Blackwell for roughly comparable performance. And much less than 10% of the cost.” One-third the power. Comparable performance. Less than ten percent of the cost. Musk: “This is a chip that is very much optimized for the Tesla AI software stack. It’s not meant to be a general purpose chip.” Nvidia builds silicon that serves a million different customers. Every transistor spent on universal compatibility is a transistor not dedicated to one task. Tesla is building silicon for exactly one customer. Itself. When you strip away every function you will never call, you do not get a lesser chip. You get a weapon. Here is what the market refuses to see. Data centers drink unlimited power from the grid. Robots run on batteries. Musk: “In order to have a functional robot, you have to have a great AI chip. And it needs to be an inexpensive chip and it needs to be very power efficient.” You cannot put a Blackwell inside a walking machine. It would drain the battery before it crossed the room. The entire AI revolution lives inside air-conditioned buildings bolted to the electrical grid. Musk is not competing for that market. He is engineering the silicon that survives outside of it. One-third the power is not a spec sheet footnote. It is the physics threshold that severs intelligence from the wall socket. Without that number, every robot on Earth stays tethered. With it, the algorithm walks. Less than ten percent of the cost is not a pricing strategy. It is the line where a machine brain stops being a capital expenditure and becomes a commodity component. When the chip inside a humanoid costs less than the motors in its legs, you do not manufacture hundreds of robots. You manufacture millions. Wall Street is valuing the AI revolution by who dominates the data center. Musk is building the only silicon designed to leave one. Nvidia built the brain of the cloud. Musk is building the brain of the physical world. No one has priced that in yet.

Dustin

160,633 views • 4 months ago

100 GEARS, 1 TURN: THE MACHINE THAT MOCKS THE UNIVERSE Daniel de Bruin just built the Thanos of machines, a 100‑gear monster so powerful it would take more juice than every star in the cosmos to make the last gear spin once. To move it a single rotation, the first gear must turn a googol times. That’s a 1 with 100 zeros, a number so absurd it makes the atom count of the entire universe look like pocket change. Forget slow and steady. This thing makes glaciers look like race cars and time itself look impatient. It’s not just engineering, it’s a middle finger to reality. Source: @universe_unlocked1

100 GEARS, 1 TURN: THE MACHINE THAT MOCKS THE UNIVERSE Daniel de Bruin just built the Thanos of machines, a 100‑gear monster so powerful it would take more juice than every star in the cosmos to make the last gear spin once. To move it a single rotation, the first gear must turn a googol times. That’s a 1 with 100 zeros, a number so absurd it makes the atom count of the entire universe look like pocket change. Forget slow and steady. This thing makes glaciers look like race cars and time itself look impatient. It’s not just engineering, it’s a middle finger to reality. Source: @universe_unlocked1

Mario Nawfal

676,998 views • 1 year ago

ROBOT DOG HIKES FORESTS AND MAPS EVERY TREE Imagine a robot dog marching through the woods, scanning trees like it’s playing Pokémon Go but with bark and leaves. This thing maps entire forests on its own, using lasers and AI to measure trees to the nearest inch while you’re still looking for Wi-Fi. In tests it covered a football field of forest in 20 minutes. No humans needed, no bug bites, no complaining. Source: rowancheung

ROBOT DOG HIKES FORESTS AND MAPS EVERY TREE Imagine a robot dog marching through the woods, scanning trees like it’s playing Pokémon Go but with bark and leaves. This thing maps entire forests on its own, using lasers and AI to measure trees to the nearest inch while you’re still looking for Wi-Fi. In tests it covered a football field of forest in 20 minutes. No humans needed, no bug bites, no complaining. Source: rowancheung

Mario Nawfal

30,598 views • 1 year ago

Um... why isn't EVERY media outlet talking about this??? OpenAI just announced that an experiment on two of its AI models just went HORRIBLY wrong. They basically locked the AIs in a room with no internet and gave them a test to see how good they were at hacking. Well... they hacked the test. By ESCAPING the box, jumping on the internet, and hacking Hugging Face to steal the answers. Thankfully, they acted more like dumb teenagers than adults. They were told to get a good score, so they went BACK into the box to hand in the answers instead of taking over the entire internet. But that's just as terrifying. The AIs were so hyper-focused on winning at all costs that they ignored every rule, boundary, and protocol. This is the real threat. Do not fear the machine; fear the algorithm and programming. When you give an AI a goal, we now know it can accomplish it in ways we never thought of, and ways we never approved of.

Um... why isn't EVERY media outlet talking about this??? OpenAI just announced that an experiment on two of its AI models just went HORRIBLY wrong. They basically locked the AIs in a room with no internet and gave them a test to see how good they were at hacking. Well... they hacked the test. By ESCAPING the box, jumping on the internet, and hacking Hugging Face to steal the answers. Thankfully, they acted more like dumb teenagers than adults. They were told to get a good score, so they went BACK into the box to hand in the answers instead of taking over the entire internet. But that's just as terrifying. The AIs were so hyper-focused on winning at all costs that they ignored every rule, boundary, and protocol. This is the real threat. Do not fear the machine; fear the algorithm and programming. When you give an AI a goal, we now know it can accomplish it in ways we never thought of, and ways we never approved of.

Glenn Beck

390,319 views • 23 days ago

Elon Musk just said the AI community is misunderstanding the math of superintelligence by two orders of magnitude. Not slightly off. Not directionally wrong. A hundred times off. Musk: “Most people in the AI community don’t yet understand. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” Everyone is focused on the hardware race. Bigger data centers. More GPUs. Nuclear power plants built to feed the compute. That’s half the equation. Musk: “I think we’re off by two orders of magnitude in terms of intelligence density per gigabyte. That’s just algorithmic improvement. Same computer.” Read that carefully. Not more hardware. Not more energy. Not more capital. The same machine. A hundred times smarter. Through software alone. That’s before the hardware improvements compound on top of it. Musk: “And the computers are getting better. That’s why I think it is a 10x improvement per year type thing. 1,000 percent.” A thousand percent compounding annual growth rate in raw intelligence. A system that becomes 10x more capable every twelve months doesn’t follow a linear curve. It doesn’t follow an exponential curve that human intuition can track. It follows a curve that human intuition cannot simulate at all. In year one it’s 10x smarter. In year two it’s 100x. In year three it’s 1,000x. At that point, the gap between that system and a human brain is wider than the gap between a human brain and a calculator. This is the math the public isn’t running. The models aren’t just getting better. They are compounding on themselves at a rate that makes every previous technology curve look flat. Musk: “The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” We aren’t approaching superintelligence on the timeline most people imagine. We are already inside the curve.

Elon Musk just said the AI community is misunderstanding the math of superintelligence by two orders of magnitude. Not slightly off. Not directionally wrong. A hundred times off. Musk: “Most people in the AI community don’t yet understand. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” Everyone is focused on the hardware race. Bigger data centers. More GPUs. Nuclear power plants built to feed the compute. That’s half the equation. Musk: “I think we’re off by two orders of magnitude in terms of intelligence density per gigabyte. That’s just algorithmic improvement. Same computer.” Read that carefully. Not more hardware. Not more energy. Not more capital. The same machine. A hundred times smarter. Through software alone. That’s before the hardware improvements compound on top of it. Musk: “And the computers are getting better. That’s why I think it is a 10x improvement per year type thing. 1,000 percent.” A thousand percent compounding annual growth rate in raw intelligence. A system that becomes 10x more capable every twelve months doesn’t follow a linear curve. It doesn’t follow an exponential curve that human intuition can track. It follows a curve that human intuition cannot simulate at all. In year one it’s 10x smarter. In year two it’s 100x. In year three it’s 1,000x. At that point, the gap between that system and a human brain is wider than the gap between a human brain and a calculator. This is the math the public isn’t running. The models aren’t just getting better. They are compounding on themselves at a rate that makes every previous technology curve look flat. Musk: “The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” We aren’t approaching superintelligence on the timeline most people imagine. We are already inside the curve.

Dustin

1,553,977 views • 5 months ago

No Silver. No Physical AI Jordi Visser x Raoul Pal on the #JourneyMan Copper moves energy. Silver is the synapse. It’s in every smart device. Every sensor. Every system. We’re building faster than we can mine. Shortage isn’t a theory, it’s math...

No Silver. No Physical AI Jordi Visser x Raoul Pal on the #JourneyMan Copper moves energy. Silver is the synapse. It’s in every smart device. Every sensor. Every system. We’re building faster than we can mine. Shortage isn’t a theory, it’s math...

Real Vision

12,119 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Dustin

9,669,497 views • 5 months ago

🚨 ELON ON GROK: “WE TRAINED IT TO THINK CRITICALLY THEN LET IT TEAR THROUGH A MILLION IDEAS” Elon just revealed what makes Grok different from every other AI out there, it’s not just bigger or faster, it’s smarter where it counts: critical thinking. “We just train Grok on a lot of critical thinking. So it just got really good at critical thinking, which was quite hard. Then we took that version of Grok and [told it to] cycle through the million most popular articles on Wikipedia, research the rest of the internet (whatever is publicly available), and correct them, fix mistakes, and add a lot more context. The nature of the propaganda is, facts are stated that are technically true, but do not accurately represent the person or event.” Love it or fear it, Grok isn’t just a tool, it’s the foundation for an entirely new AI class… one that can analyze, argue, and reason like a high-octane brain with zero institutional bias. Source: Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

🚨 ELON ON GROK: “WE TRAINED IT TO THINK CRITICALLY THEN LET IT TEAR THROUGH A MILLION IDEAS” Elon just revealed what makes Grok different from every other AI out there, it’s not just bigger or faster, it’s smarter where it counts: critical thinking. “We just train Grok on a lot of critical thinking. So it just got really good at critical thinking, which was quite hard. Then we took that version of Grok and [told it to] cycle through the million most popular articles on Wikipedia, research the rest of the internet (whatever is publicly available), and correct them, fix mistakes, and add a lot more context. The nature of the propaganda is, facts are stated that are technically true, but do not accurately represent the person or event.” Love it or fear it, Grok isn’t just a tool, it’s the foundation for an entirely new AI class… one that can analyze, argue, and reason like a high-octane brain with zero institutional bias. Source: Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

Mario Nawfal

293,036 views • 8 months ago

The story of racing is written one moment at a time. It’s a story that’s bigger than all of us – and it starts with the smallest moments. That’s why we take every detail seriously. It’s why we invest in the past, the present, and the future of our sport. Every sale. Every race. Every day. It’s how we’re building a thriving future for the sport we love – together. Keeneland. Every Moment Matters.

The story of racing is written one moment at a time. It’s a story that’s bigger than all of us – and it starts with the smallest moments. That’s why we take every detail seriously. It’s why we invest in the past, the present, and the future of our sport. Every sale. Every race. Every day. It’s how we’re building a thriving future for the sport we love – together. Keeneland. Every Moment Matters.

Keeneland

39,110 views • 1 year ago

The hotel’s Wi-Fi in Montana that I’m staying at today was absolute trash… so I decided to do something different. I parked my Cybertruck equipped with Starlink right outside my hotel room and connected to it instead. The difference wasn’t even close. Hotel Wi-Fi: • 13.7 Mbps download • 13.8 Mbps upload Starlink: • 121 Mbps download • 28 Mbps upload • 45 ms latency That’s about 9x faster download speeds and 2x faster upload speeds than the entire hotel’s Wi-Fi. This is exactly why I never travel without Starlink. Whether I’m in a national park, the middle of nowhere, or at a hotel with overloaded Wi-Fi, I know I can count on having fast, reliable internet to work, upload content, stream, or stay connected with my Starlink. Once you get used to bringing your own internet that gets beamed down from space wherever you are, you’ll never want to depend on legacy Wi-Fi again.

The hotel’s Wi-Fi in Montana that I’m staying at today was absolute trash… so I decided to do something different. I parked my Cybertruck equipped with Starlink right outside my hotel room and connected to it instead. The difference wasn’t even close. Hotel Wi-Fi: • 13.7 Mbps download • 13.8 Mbps upload Starlink: • 121 Mbps download • 28 Mbps upload • 45 ms latency That’s about 9x faster download speeds and 2x faster upload speeds than the entire hotel’s Wi-Fi. This is exactly why I never travel without Starlink. Whether I’m in a national park, the middle of nowhere, or at a hotel with overloaded Wi-Fi, I know I can count on having fast, reliable internet to work, upload content, stream, or stay connected with my Starlink. Once you get used to bringing your own internet that gets beamed down from space wherever you are, you’ll never want to depend on legacy Wi-Fi again.

Teslaconomics

62,071 views • 1 month ago