Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

All this from a single light source! Light nodes are so insanely powerful, holy crap! 🤯 All it is, is a Light Path, Map Range, and Color Ramp node. Super easy! If you're interested, come hang out in our discord for more stuff like this! :) #b3d #blender3d #blender...

SMOUSE_CG's profile picture

SMOUSE 🔸 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

11,298 subscribers

601,614 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииИскусство#b3d
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля KillinSmallz
KillinSmallz2 лет назад

this is actually insane

Фото профиля MVPuccin⚙
MVPuccin⚙2 лет назад

Now if only light nodes worked in Eevee

Фото профиля Daniel Lazaro
Daniel Lazaro2 лет назад

damn, thanks for showing us the way

Фото профиля zigor
zigor2 лет назад

Wow! Thanks 🙏

Фото профиля BluePixelAnimations
BluePixelAnimations2 лет назад

I didn't know you could use ray length with a light source!! That's awesome!!!

Фото профиля DeBullVader🎨🖌️🐂
DeBullVader🎨🖌️🐂2 лет назад

Wow that's incredible!!

Фото профиля Scan The World
Scan The World2 лет назад

❤️

Фото профиля SMOUSE 🔸
SMOUSE 🔸2 лет назад

Your guys assets for incredible! Thank you massively for providing them! 💗💗

Фото профиля The Walking Mirror of Time @ ꒒꒐ꃳꌅꁲꌅꐔ ꊿꊯ ꀷꌅꑀꁲꂵꈜ
The Walking Mirror of Time @ ꒒꒐ꃳꌅꁲꌅꐔ ꊿꊯ ꀷꌅꑀꁲꂵꈜ2 лет назад

@Bbbn192

Фото профиля doctor gonz/plague vtuber🔞 commissions open
doctor gonz/plague vtuber🔞 commissions open2 лет назад

is this the last version of blender?

Фото профиля SMOUSE 🔸
SMOUSE 🔸2 лет назад

It's 3.6, and using Agx, but besides that it should work on all previous versions of blender that suppor light nodes

Похожие видео

"Nooo, you can't do multi-colored product renders with just a single light source!" My honest reaction: #b3d #blender3d #blender #lights #lightnodes #nodevember2023 #Nodevember #procedural #3dlighting #3dart #lightingartist #lightingdirection #lightingdesign
0:22

"Nooo, you can't do multi-colored product renders with just a single light source!" My honest reaction: #b3d #blender3d #blender #lights #lightnodes #nodevember2023 #Nodevember #procedural #3dlighting #3dart #lightingartist #lightingdirection #lightingdesign

SMOUSE 🔸 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

226,112 просмотров • 2 лет назад

A true "Black Light"? :O This is basically an "inverted light", as shown by the chosen color being displayed as its opposite at the end of the clip. Useful for forcing certain areas like cave entrances to be darker than usual! We have a discord btw! :) #b3d #blender3d #blender #lights #lightnodes #nodevember2023 #Nodevember #procedural #3dlighting #3dart #lightingartist #lightingdirection #lightingdesign
0:57

A true "Black Light"? :O This is basically an "inverted light", as shown by the chosen color being displayed as its opposite at the end of the clip. Useful for forcing certain areas like cave entrances to be darker than usual! We have a discord btw! :) #b3d #blender3d #blender #lights #lightnodes #nodevember2023 #Nodevember #procedural #3dlighting #3dart #lightingartist #lightingdirection #lightingdesign

SMOUSE 🔸

78,012 просмотров • 2 лет назад

TIL that you can adjust a light's falloff color by using the Ray Length output from the Light Path Node, clamping it down, and plugging it into some color-based nodes! Super handy for stylized lighting! 🤩 #b3d #blender3d #blender #lighting #nodes
0:44

TIL that you can adjust a light's falloff color by using the Ray Length output from the Light Path Node, clamping it down, and plugging it into some color-based nodes! Super handy for stylized lighting! 🤩 #b3d #blender3d #blender #lighting #nodes

SMOUSE 🔸 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

334,592 просмотров • 2 лет назад

A Fresnel lens is manufactured with grooves in it so the light path is changing from a single point which exposes to all sides, to a straight light path. Using this principle, a kind of "invisibily shield" can be created [video:
0:38

A Fresnel lens is manufactured with grooves in it so the light path is changing from a single point which exposes to all sides, to a straight light path. Using this principle, a kind of "invisibily shield" can be created [video:

Massimo

65,370 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Discovered a neat hack to add light & color to my scene! Basically using background nodes and gradients to have manual control. Check out this tutorial I prepped for it :) Pls boost if you found it useful!! More like this on my youtube~ -- #3dart #stylized #howl #HowlsMovingCastle #studioghibli #3dmodeling #lowpoly #toon #3d #gamedev #blender Blender 🔶
2:34

Discovered a neat hack to add light & color to my scene! Basically using background nodes and gradients to have manual control. Check out this tutorial I prepped for it :) Pls boost if you found it useful!! More like this on my youtube~ -- #3dart #stylized #howl #HowlsMovingCastle #studioghibli #3dmodeling #lowpoly #toon #3d #gamedev #blender Blender 🔶

Cherylynn Lima

19,354 просмотров • 1 год назад

SPACE IS WEIRD AND TERRIFYING This glowing ring is not a fancy donut. It’s a black hole munching on everything around it. What you’re seeing is light and matter swirling so fast that even physics is like “good luck figuring this out.” If you fall in, there’s no escape. Not even light makes it out alive. Basically, it’s the universe’s ultimate trash compactor. Source: Going Viral
0:28

SPACE IS WEIRD AND TERRIFYING This glowing ring is not a fancy donut. It’s a black hole munching on everything around it. What you’re seeing is light and matter swirling so fast that even physics is like “good luck figuring this out.” If you fall in, there’s no escape. Not even light makes it out alive. Basically, it’s the universe’s ultimate trash compactor. Source: Going Viral

Mario Nawfal

87,798 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨ISS FOOTAGE: A LOOK AT OUR NIGHT SKY FROM SPACE This is what Earth looks like at an altitude of 250 miles: wars, cities, your group chat, all just spots of light blinking in infinity. Each cluster of lights is a city flickering like it's trying to be mistaken for a star by aliens a million light years away. Kind of magical. Kind of funny. Source: @nasadailyupdates on TikTok
1:09

🚨ISS FOOTAGE: A LOOK AT OUR NIGHT SKY FROM SPACE This is what Earth looks like at an altitude of 250 miles: wars, cities, your group chat, all just spots of light blinking in infinity. Each cluster of lights is a city flickering like it's trying to be mistaken for a star by aliens a million light years away. Kind of magical. Kind of funny. Source: @nasadailyupdates on TikTok

Mario Nawfal

28,869 просмотров • 1 год назад

More #eevee stuff. Originally intended for Cycles, but I'm curious how it looked in Eevee. And again, it looks good already. The only addition I had was in the real-time compositor to push the dark and light areas, and some color adjustment. There are a few point lights near the wall to fake the GI, carried over from the Cycles scene, which helps a lot in this case. #b3d
0:57

More #eevee stuff. Originally intended for Cycles, but I'm curious how it looked in Eevee. And again, it looks good already. The only addition I had was in the real-time compositor to push the dark and light areas, and some color adjustment. There are a few point lights near the wall to fake the GI, carried over from the Cycles scene, which helps a lot in this case. #b3d

Kyokaz

18,430 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

I just filmed this outside in my backyard. What on earth is that? My rational mind is telling me it’s the light from a plane but shouldn’t it have the red and green lights too? Are those being blocked by the clouds? For a split second I was expecting a bright green light and all the animals being lifted in the air. Waiting on your opinion.
0:41

I just filmed this outside in my backyard. What on earth is that? My rational mind is telling me it’s the light from a plane but shouldn’t it have the red and green lights too? Are those being blocked by the clouds? For a split second I was expecting a bright green light and all the animals being lifted in the air. Waiting on your opinion.

Metatron

17,427 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Oh, man, First Light is such an epic stealth game" Looks like you can just Leeroy Jenkins a room with like 20 enemies in it and the game doesn't punish you at all. Games like this are supposed to put you in your place for doing stuff like this.
2:25

"Oh, man, First Light is such an epic stealth game" Looks like you can just Leeroy Jenkins a room with like 20 enemies in it and the game doesn't punish you at all. Games like this are supposed to put you in your place for doing stuff like this.

🌘ʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ⚡

421,465 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem himself described what happens: “From the core of the very stone on which Jesus lay an indefinable light pours forth. It usually has a blue tint, but the color may change and take on many different hues. It cannot be described in human terms. The light rises out of the stone as mist may rise out of a lake — it almost looks as if the stone is covered by a moist cloud, but it is light. This light behaves differently each year. Sometimes it covers just the stone, while other times it gives light to the whole sepulchre, so that people who are standing outside the tomb and look into it see the tomb filled with light. The light does not burn — I have never had my beard burnt in all the sixteen years I have been Patriarch in Jerusalem and have received the Holy Fire.” Thousands of pilgrims hold their hands and faces in the flame and report the same thing. It does not burn.
0:26

The Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem himself described what happens: “From the core of the very stone on which Jesus lay an indefinable light pours forth. It usually has a blue tint, but the color may change and take on many different hues. It cannot be described in human terms. The light rises out of the stone as mist may rise out of a lake — it almost looks as if the stone is covered by a moist cloud, but it is light. This light behaves differently each year. Sometimes it covers just the stone, while other times it gives light to the whole sepulchre, so that people who are standing outside the tomb and look into it see the tomb filled with light. The light does not burn — I have never had my beard burnt in all the sixteen years I have been Patriarch in Jerusalem and have received the Holy Fire.” Thousands of pilgrims hold their hands and faces in the flame and report the same thing. It does not burn.

sacredchad

18,596 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I like style between NPR and PBR Why I mix base color : 1.Make shade color lighter → Result become flatter 2. It keeps all BSDF effects as half 3. One factor to control style For Soft&Hard Shadow : Just Use Light Angle this is just a simple good start #blender
1:48

I like style between NPR and PBR Why I mix base color : 1.Make shade color lighter → Result become flatter 2. It keeps all BSDF effects as half 3. One factor to control style For Soft&Hard Shadow : Just Use Light Angle this is just a simple good start #blender

龍の宴

60,275 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This one came in 3 hours ago… Running scans takes time…. Sent it to 2 of my…”People” to double check what I found….. It a green light!! Ok so now that we did check it a few times……… FLORIDA “Near” the University of Florida Crazy lights appeared in the sky…. First one…. Then more…. Grabbing a Camera from the house and running back out… The lights were moving all over at crazy speeds …. Then…….. A huge fiery light appeared…. The Sphere shaped lights began to act as though they were being controlled…….. So… my friend Patrick Jackson We gotta seriously get you to write a second book my brother…. This stuff is on a massive uptick!!! This is what I was sent…………. Jon Stewart
1:47

This one came in 3 hours ago… Running scans takes time…. Sent it to 2 of my…”People” to double check what I found….. It a green light!! Ok so now that we did check it a few times……… FLORIDA “Near” the University of Florida Crazy lights appeared in the sky…. First one…. Then more…. Grabbing a Camera from the house and running back out… The lights were moving all over at crazy speeds …. Then…….. A huge fiery light appeared…. The Sphere shaped lights began to act as though they were being controlled…….. So… my friend Patrick Jackson We gotta seriously get you to write a second book my brother…. This stuff is on a massive uptick!!! This is what I was sent…………. Jon Stewart

Eddie Abbott

107,938 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

In the dark times we’re living through today, sometimes it takes just one beacon of pure integrity, light and moral courage to illuminate the path for all of us. And there is nobody who epitomizes moral courage and integrity more than the stunning and powerful Erin Molan. This monologue today from Erin is out of this world. It is the very beacon of strength that we all need more of today. Thank you Erin Molan for being that voice 🩷👊🏽
4:34

In the dark times we’re living through today, sometimes it takes just one beacon of pure integrity, light and moral courage to illuminate the path for all of us. And there is nobody who epitomizes moral courage and integrity more than the stunning and powerful Erin Molan. This monologue today from Erin is out of this world. It is the very beacon of strength that we all need more of today. Thank you Erin Molan for being that voice 🩷👊🏽

Chaya’s Clan

29,780 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sparse Volumetric Light maps (WebGPU). Worked on ensuring C0 continuity across the entire map. For now this is achieved by purging incomplete node levels, works well enough even if it's a bit of a blunt tool. Actual locations for probes during the bake are now going through an optimization phase, which allows me to push probes behind surfaces out into the open resulting in much fewer light leakage artifacts. This video here has only 28,376 probes in the map, and takes 1.8Mb of VRAM
0:36

Sparse Volumetric Light maps (WebGPU). Worked on ensuring C0 continuity across the entire map. For now this is achieved by purging incomplete node levels, works well enough even if it's a bit of a blunt tool. Actual locations for probes during the bake are now going through an optimization phase, which allows me to push probes behind surfaces out into the open resulting in much fewer light leakage artifacts. This video here has only 28,376 probes in the map, and takes 1.8Mb of VRAM

Alex Goldring

15,814 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Universities teach many erroneous models. One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton. It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on. Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false. (See first comments for attached images and substantiation) I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters. I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves. 2 prisms for $10 Harmonics of Light and Sound: This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them. The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff. Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom: Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom: Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory: Clay Taylor Color Theory: Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments. Laser and Mirror observation: It's never the same light. Re-emission Example: I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript. Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions). The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point. The incoming light is a different frame of reference. All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context. E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More: 71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min) The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives: Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time. (This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.) "Too off the rails."
22:27

Universities teach many erroneous models. One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton. It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on. Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false. (See first comments for attached images and substantiation) I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters. I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves. 2 prisms for $10 Harmonics of Light and Sound: This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them. The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff. Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom: Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom: Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory: Clay Taylor Color Theory: Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments. Laser and Mirror observation: It's never the same light. Re-emission Example: I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript. Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions). The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point. The incoming light is a different frame of reference. All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context. E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More: 71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min) The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives: Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time. (This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.) "Too off the rails."

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

44,361 просмотров • 1 год назад

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:
0:21

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 просмотров • 1 год назад

The TRAILER of #Dhamaal4 is OUT now and it has SUPER HIT WRITTEN ALL OVER IT🔥 Kind of LIGHT CONTENT Bollywood desperately needed after a HIGH DOSE of Action films like #Dhurandhar and all.. this one will bring FAMILY AUDIENCE & KIDS in large numbers this SUMMAR ✅ MAZA AAGAYA BHAI !!! FDFS confirmed🎬 Ajay Devgn T-Series
3:27

The TRAILER of #Dhamaal4 is OUT now and it has SUPER HIT WRITTEN ALL OVER IT🔥 Kind of LIGHT CONTENT Bollywood desperately needed after a HIGH DOSE of Action films like #Dhurandhar and all.. this one will bring FAMILY AUDIENCE & KIDS in large numbers this SUMMAR ✅ MAZA AAGAYA BHAI !!! FDFS confirmed🎬 Ajay Devgn T-Series

CineHub

39,819 просмотров • 1 месяц назад