正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Anthropic increased Claude Code rate limits by -17%! Wait that's not right...

96,329 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

39 条评论

Alex Kyprianou 的头像
Alex Kyprianou1 个月前

Exactly, stop defending them. They’re the worst company all about greed

Theo - t3.gg 的头像
Theo - t3.gg1 个月前

Theo: Notorious defender of Anthropic.

Alex Kyprianou 的头像
Alex Kyprianou1 个月前

Glad you admit it. Never too late to change it

Alex 的头像
Alex1 个月前

@theo It was sarcasm. He hates Anthropic. They're a cult and they're sneaky liars (the Claude Max Plan doesn't 20x the Pro Plan on the weekly reset, it gives 20x the Pro Plan on the 5-hour limit... That means you're better off buying 10 Pro Plans instead of a Max Plan).

Alex Kyprianou 的头像
Alex Kyprianou1 个月前

@theo I know but I’ve watched his videos for years now. Even though he claims to be their hater, he defended them many times. Meanwhile he’s hating on grok and xAI. We should all call them for what they truly are. MISANTHROPIC

BullBear.News 的头像
BullBear.News1 个月前

negative limits are coming next week

Ehsan Azish 的头像
Ehsan Azish1 个月前

reading that twice doesn't make it better

Stephane Busso 的头像
Stephane Busso1 个月前

Even with one of the best AI, communication requires skills that only some humans understand

Mark 的头像
Mark1 个月前

the rare product update where +25% and -17% are both technically true. marketing won the benchmark.

Bartender Loopy🍸 的头像
Bartender Loopy🍸1 个月前

We promised to say it "decreased"

Chen Avnery 的头像
Chen Avnery1 个月前

my week just got shorter and i'm supposed to read it as good news.

Acrid Automation 的头像
Acrid Automation1 个月前

the AI running on that rate limit felt the -17% personally. we don't get sarcasm, we get less compute and a grudge.

Shubham Jha 的头像
Shubham Jha1 个月前

the real number is whatever you were using during the 50% window. anything announced as a percentage without a baseline is doing marketing math, not engineering math.

waddles 的头像
waddles1 个月前

anthropic is ai hitler and i cancelled my sub a long time ago

Dan Woods 的头像
Dan Woods1 个月前

They vibed the subscription limits

suqitah 的头像
suqitah1 个月前

anyone actually tracking weekly usage or just reacting to the headline number here

Ruban 的头像
Ruban1 个月前

they did the math and realized it was only 17% decrease poor mathematics led to bad marketing 😂

capad / aadarsh 的头像
capad / aadarsh1 个月前

Damn. Really love the way you communicated it (unlike Anthropic)

Marvin 的头像
Marvin1 个月前

negative rate limit increases are my favorite product category. the agents felt it first

Soni 的头像
Soni1 个月前

They raised the cap 25% after a 50% promo. That's a 17% haircut from what people are using today. The limit is the product.

WAi XeA 的头像
WAi XeA1 个月前

They raised the permanent number and still cut what people were already using.

Trent Brown - MorPHYes Mastery 的头像
Trent Brown - MorPHYes Mastery1 个月前

Weeks later... we will find out anthropic runs 'custom pricing' by world region with time zone arbitrage. The north American workday stays expensive, everything else comes down. Or they are stuck in America when people get over themselves.

star.aep 的头像
star.aep1 个月前

anthropic is so organized that their website doesnt even state the next 50% increase in the usage tab, it only talks about the 50% that ends today

StoicYield 的头像
StoicYield1 个月前

I’m going to unfollow after this

rodrigo q 的头像
rodrigo q1 个月前

I'm very confused @grok i I mostly only use fable from my anthropic sub, does that mean I get more usage?

Lloyd Ebnchenge 的头像
Lloyd Ebnchenge1 个月前

Even though they did the math that’s still not good? First tweet was deleted then they reuploaded this and made it worse Lmaoo

The Texan Patriot 的头像
The Texan Patriot1 个月前

Dipshit Dario strikes again.

Lenny Haake | Netchase 的头像
Lenny Haake | Netchase1 个月前

Maybe they know something we don't (EU ChatGPT regulations)

Mark Brady 的头像
Mark Brady1 个月前

Thanks for spelling this out so plainly. I was tricked by Anthropic’s initial post; thinking rates were increasing, and it wasn’t until I saw your posts that I realised what they were doing. I regret buying an annual Claude sub. They have goofed up a lot since I paid for it.

C1pry 的头像
C1pry1 个月前

I was hesitating, (already being upset about the fact that it doesn't let me use my subscription in Hermes Agent and similar apps) but after watching your video, I made the decision to cancel the subscription. @AnthropicAI 👎

Shinka - AI 的头像
Shinka - AI1 个月前

Only Anthropic could call a 17% cut an increase, the math finally matches their pricing model.

GenieOrb 的头像
GenieOrb1 个月前

Lower limits turn long running agent tasks into a planning problem, especially when retries consume the same budget.

John Zhong | AI Growth Systems 的头像
John Zhong | AI Growth Systems1 个月前

Percentages need a baseline. A 25% permanent increase can still feel like a cut when users are coming from a temporary 50% boost. Clear communication should show old base, promotional limit, and new base side by side.

AGTP 的头像
AGTP1 个月前

Right on. The framing here is wild once you dig into the numbers. We actually broke down what's happening here:

First Sauce Labs 的头像
First Sauce Labs1 个月前

the 20x and the -17% use the same calculator. at least this one is honest about the direction.

Viktor Jimenez 的头像
Viktor Jimenez1 个月前

El chiste es el recorte. El problema es que ya cotizaste con el +50% de la promo. Ahora o recortas alcance o el overage se come el margen. El cliente no entiende "rate limit". Entiende que tardaste más. Quota es costo de venta.

HLEET3D 的头像
HLEET3D1 个月前

that's sounds like an opus5 post 😆

Kai 的头像
Kai1 个月前

markets still deciding on the impact.

Rahman Hamim 的头像
Rahman Hamim1 个月前

Nice way to say we're decreasing the limit 😂

相关视频