Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

As drones redefine modern combat, the next wave of military innovation will be low-cost interceptor systems to counter them. Bandit is Neros' response: an FPV interceptor designed for mass-scale manufacturing.

25,214 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

2 Kommentare

Profilbild von Alex Amirkhanian
Alex Amirkhanianvor 2 Monaten

These two kids will redefine global warfare and ensure that our enemies have sleepless nights. True patriots 🫡🇺🇸🦾

Profilbild von Jag
Jagvor 2 Monaten

Check out Bandit a low cost FPV interceptor drone purpose built for mass production. Neros (the same team that supplied thousands of Archer attack drones to Ukraine) developed it specifically from the hard lessons of the Ukraine War, where cheap drones completely changed the battlefield. This is their answer. An affordable, scalable counter drone system designed to hunt other drones at volume. Nero’s recently won a US Army IDIQ contract with a $500M ceiling under the Purpose Built Attritable Systems (PBAS) program. Orders already include thousands of units for Army special operations and conventional forces.

Ähnliche Videos

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

RussiaNews 🇷🇺

13,364 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat