Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Before you watch this, here’s some context: When Goodnight was building cattle trails, there was no beef industry. No packers. No labels. No subsidized grain. Just grass, cattle, and the raw weight of the frontier. Land was cheap — but money wasn’t. There were no banks in West Texas.... show more

Texas Slim™

34,838 subscribers

25,041 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Food News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Standing in my hometown. Canyon, Texas. Back when this place was still called Canyon City, these rails were already moving the heartbeat of cattle country. Look right behind me. These same tracks run straight through Hereford, Texas — what a lot of people call the beef capital of the world. Four massive feed yards sit out there, and every day cattle move through that corridor. And from there? Beef moves onto these rail lines and out into the international food supply. Most people never see this part of the system. They see the steak on the plate. They don’t see the rails, the yards, the miles of cattle country that feed into a place like Hereford. But if you grow up here, you understand something early. Food moves on infrastructure. Rail. Land. Water. Cattle. That corridor from the top of Texas runs straight across the Ogallala and into one of the most productive beef regions on earth. This isn’t theory to us. It’s the landscape we were raised in. Satoshi Óscar Domínguez

Standing in my hometown. Canyon, Texas. Back when this place was still called Canyon City, these rails were already moving the heartbeat of cattle country. Look right behind me. These same tracks run straight through Hereford, Texas — what a lot of people call the beef capital of the world. Four massive feed yards sit out there, and every day cattle move through that corridor. And from there? Beef moves onto these rail lines and out into the international food supply. Most people never see this part of the system. They see the steak on the plate. They don’t see the rails, the yards, the miles of cattle country that feed into a place like Hereford. But if you grow up here, you understand something early. Food moves on infrastructure. Rail. Land. Water. Cattle. That corridor from the top of Texas runs straight across the Ogallala and into one of the most productive beef regions on earth. This isn’t theory to us. It’s the landscape we were raised in. Satoshi Óscar Domínguez

Texas Slim™

71,008 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | Lucknow, UP: On his tweet on Rahul Gandhi, Major General Harsha Kakar (Retired) says "The fact is that the DGMO had clarified that the moment we struck terrorist targets, we left a message from the DGMO to the Pakistan DGMO. It was a message, but no conversation that we have hit terrorist camps, no military targets, no civilian targets. This is exactly what EAM Jaishankar said. His message was twisted, and I think twisting the message was indirectly hitting back at the armed forces, which have done a correct job, implemented the government's end state and the government's plan, and that is what the intention was. It was wrong to twist it and say that they were told before. It did not happen before. There was no conversation between the two governments before the strike took place."

#WATCH | Lucknow, UP: On his tweet on Rahul Gandhi, Major General Harsha Kakar (Retired) says "The fact is that the DGMO had clarified that the moment we struck terrorist targets, we left a message from the DGMO to the Pakistan DGMO. It was a message, but no conversation that we have hit terrorist camps, no military targets, no civilian targets. This is exactly what EAM Jaishankar said. His message was twisted, and I think twisting the message was indirectly hitting back at the armed forces, which have done a correct job, implemented the government's end state and the government's plan, and that is what the intention was. It was wrong to twist it and say that they were told before. It did not happen before. There was no conversation between the two governments before the strike took place."

ANI

69,235 views • 1 year ago

It’s funny that you think this is about Rohit’s identity. It’s not. Here’s what actually happened: 1. Prz Ibu publicly said there were no military facilities in UTF. He even said he would use “Ebunaa UTF” to give land plots (“goathi”) to people and invited everyone to go and see for themselves. He claimed there was no military presence there and half of the country believed it 2. So we went there. We were stopped, because the site was under MNDF control and a military facility was being developed in UTF. 3. So what was the ‘irrefutable evidence’ about ? Ibu said there was no military establishment. We proved there was. Before we went, MDP supporters and their SM accounts kept saying there were no military structures in UTF and it would be used for giving land. After that day, nobody, including the government, denied the presence of a military facility there anymore. 4. You don’t have to ask me now if UTF is a military establishment because govt’s have since then openly admitted to it. In fact both the Maldivian and Indian governments have since acknowledged this in official documents too. So yes, the evidence was irrefutable because it proved exactly what was being denied, that a military base was indeed being developed at UTF. Had we not done that on that day, half of the nation probably would continue to believe, as ibu said, that there arent no military establishments in UTF

It’s funny that you think this is about Rohit’s identity. It’s not. Here’s what actually happened: 1. Prz Ibu publicly said there were no military facilities in UTF. He even said he would use “Ebunaa UTF” to give land plots (“goathi”) to people and invited everyone to go and see for themselves. He claimed there was no military presence there and half of the country believed it 2. So we went there. We were stopped, because the site was under MNDF control and a military facility was being developed in UTF. 3. So what was the ‘irrefutable evidence’ about ? Ibu said there was no military establishment. We proved there was. Before we went, MDP supporters and their SM accounts kept saying there were no military structures in UTF and it would be used for giving land. After that day, nobody, including the government, denied the presence of a military facility there anymore. 4. You don’t have to ask me now if UTF is a military establishment because govt’s have since then openly admitted to it. In fact both the Maldivian and Indian governments have since acknowledged this in official documents too. So yes, the evidence was irrefutable because it proved exactly what was being denied, that a military base was indeed being developed at UTF. Had we not done that on that day, half of the nation probably would continue to believe, as ibu said, that there arent no military establishments in UTF

Midhuam Saud(米渡）🇲🇻

14,240 views • 10 months ago

"Tell me about this man in Mexico." "Was he? What you needed?" "No. I mean, sort of But. "Did he hurt you?" "No. He just wasn't..." "Wasn't what?" "You. He wasn't you. "Was he the only one?" "There was a guy in L.A., "And that was it. Two guys. And you."

"Tell me about this man in Mexico." "Was he? What you needed?" "No. I mean, sort of But. "Did he hurt you?" "No. He just wasn't..." "Wasn't what?" "You. He wasn't you. "Was he the only one?" "There was a guy in L.A., "And that was it. Two guys. And you."

Bby

189,936 views • 3 months ago

JB Bickerstaff on the officials tonight for both sides. “I mean it is frustrating, the lack of consistency on what was what on both ends of the floor. I’m not saying we were reffed any different than they were, but there was no balance and no flow to the game.”

JB Bickerstaff on the officials tonight for both sides. “I mean it is frustrating, the lack of consistency on what was what on both ends of the floor. I’m not saying we were reffed any different than they were, but there was no balance and no flow to the game.”

Pistons Talk

50,066 views • 9 months ago

Long before narratives were manufactured… before labels were assigned… before resistance was even given a name... there were women in south Lebanon. Lebanese women, in the early 1970s, speaking with unshaken voices about the horrors they witnessed under Israeli occupation. No scripts. No filters. No fear. Just truth. You watch them, and what strikes you is not only the weight of what they endured, but the way they carried it. With dignity. With clarity. With a defiance that no army could silence. They did not speak as victims. They spoke as witnesses. As guardians of memory. As the first line of resistance in south Lebanon. This is what so many choose to ignore: the story did not begin when it became convenient to tell it. The oppression was there. The resistance was there. And the people, especially the women, were already standing, already refusing to break. Their voices echo across generations, reminding us that resilience is not born overnight. It is inherited. It is lived. It is unwavering. Watch closely. This is where the story truly begins.

Long before narratives were manufactured… before labels were assigned… before resistance was even given a name... there were women in south Lebanon. Lebanese women, in the early 1970s, speaking with unshaken voices about the horrors they witnessed under Israeli occupation. No scripts. No filters. No fear. Just truth. You watch them, and what strikes you is not only the weight of what they endured, but the way they carried it. With dignity. With clarity. With a defiance that no army could silence. They did not speak as victims. They spoke as witnesses. As guardians of memory. As the first line of resistance in south Lebanon. This is what so many choose to ignore: the story did not begin when it became convenient to tell it. The oppression was there. The resistance was there. And the people, especially the women, were already standing, already refusing to break. Their voices echo across generations, reminding us that resilience is not born overnight. It is inherited. It is lived. It is unwavering. Watch closely. This is where the story truly begins.

Marwa Osman || مروة عثمان

20,904 views • 5 months ago

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 views • 4 months ago

They’re signing beef contracts four years before it hits your fork. And most folks don’t even have cows on the land anymore. That’s the scam: plenty of grass, no cattle. Plenty of “programs,” no value. The cattle aren’t missing because the land disappeared. They’re missing because your land got reclassified, reappraised, regulated, leveraged, taxed, and stripped of its utility. They sold you debt. They sold you compliance. They sold you out. Meanwhile, the global meat supply got bought up in advance. What we’re building now isn’t just about clean beef—it’s a new layer of asset value for the land itself. You want to monetize grass? You want to finance cattle with zero credit scores and full sovereignty? You want to flip this food system on its damn head? Then stop looking at cows like a cost. Start seeing them like your grandfather did: as leverage, as liquidity, as legacy. That’s what we’re bringing on this Global Wild Kingdom Beef & Bitcoin Tour— real asset value, rebuilt from the dirt up. I Am Texas Slim— Are you? Beef Initiative🇺🇸🇸🇻Beef.com Óscar Domínguez

They’re signing beef contracts four years before it hits your fork. And most folks don’t even have cows on the land anymore. That’s the scam: plenty of grass, no cattle. Plenty of “programs,” no value. The cattle aren’t missing because the land disappeared. They’re missing because your land got reclassified, reappraised, regulated, leveraged, taxed, and stripped of its utility. They sold you debt. They sold you compliance. They sold you out. Meanwhile, the global meat supply got bought up in advance. What we’re building now isn’t just about clean beef—it’s a new layer of asset value for the land itself. You want to monetize grass? You want to finance cattle with zero credit scores and full sovereignty? You want to flip this food system on its damn head? Then stop looking at cows like a cost. Start seeing them like your grandfather did: as leverage, as liquidity, as legacy. That’s what we’re bringing on this Global Wild Kingdom Beef & Bitcoin Tour— real asset value, rebuilt from the dirt up. I Am Texas Slim— Are you? Beef Initiative🇺🇸🇸🇻Beef.com Óscar Domínguez

Texas Slim™

115,781 views • 7 months ago

They tell you Rome fell in 476, but it actually fell nearly a decade before. The last century of Rome was just puppets of no real influence. When it "fell" in 476, it was just a teenage boy on the Imperial throne and there was no great battle; just a retirement. Watch 👇

They tell you Rome fell in 476, but it actually fell nearly a decade before. The last century of Rome was just puppets of no real influence. When it "fell" in 476, it was just a teenage boy on the Imperial throne and there was no great battle; just a retirement. Watch 👇

Jeremy Ryan Slate

24,068 views • 2 months ago

PREDATOR EXPOSED IN A FINANCIAL AUDIT 💀!!! Caleb Hammer says that it is completely inappropriate to perform sexual acts in the living room while a child is in the house, regardless of whether it was intended to be seen. Caleb Hammer: How do you get off on that unless you're a... No, because the way she... Woman: Because we had issues in the past with... issues. That we had already resolved, but then he kept... Caleb Hammer: In what? In what? No, no, no. Context, please. What issues would lead to that insinuation? Woman: My little sister spent the night one time, um, and he stayed in the living room and she walked out to go grab a drink and he was on the couch doing very inappropriate things. Proceeded to lie to me and my mom about it when she wanted to go home, and so then he tied me saying it was weird into the past experience. Caleb hammer : How old is she? Woman: At the time, she was like seven. Caleb: [Groans and ducks under the desk] Guys, what the f... No, no, no, no, no. Seven-year-old in the house? Why are you in the living room getting off? No, no, no, you don't do... No. First of all, I just got to note that literally nobody knew this, by the way. But, um... if a kid is in the house, we don't set up sexual exposures unless there's like a... intent to be caught in some way. Man: No, she... that must be... Caleb: No, no, no, no, no. Nobody sets out in the living room. Man: No, I was sleeping in the living room. They were sleeping in the bedroom. Caleb: Oh, you still go to the bathroom. As a masturbated myself, I know... Woman: And that's why I said it was one night, like, she was spending the night one night. Even if... Caleb: And what was he caught doing, specifically? Woman: Jacking off.

Sensitive content

PREDATOR EXPOSED IN A FINANCIAL AUDIT 💀!!! Caleb Hammer says that it is completely inappropriate to perform sexual acts in the living room while a child is in the house, regardless of whether it was intended to be seen. Caleb Hammer: How do you get off on that unless you're a... No, because the way she... Woman: Because we had issues in the past with... issues. That we had already resolved, but then he kept... Caleb Hammer: In what? In what? No, no, no. Context, please. What issues would lead to that insinuation? Woman: My little sister spent the night one time, um, and he stayed in the living room and she walked out to go grab a drink and he was on the couch doing very inappropriate things. Proceeded to lie to me and my mom about it when she wanted to go home, and so then he tied me saying it was weird into the past experience. Caleb hammer : How old is she? Woman: At the time, she was like seven. Caleb: [Groans and ducks under the desk] Guys, what the f... No, no, no, no, no. Seven-year-old in the house? Why are you in the living room getting off? No, no, no, you don't do... No. First of all, I just got to note that literally nobody knew this, by the way. But, um... if a kid is in the house, we don't set up sexual exposures unless there's like a... intent to be caught in some way. Man: No, she... that must be... Caleb: No, no, no, no, no. Nobody sets out in the living room. Man: No, I was sleeping in the living room. They were sleeping in the bedroom. Caleb: Oh, you still go to the bathroom. As a masturbated myself, I know... Woman: And that's why I said it was one night, like, she was spending the night one night. Even if... Caleb: And what was he caught doing, specifically? Woman: Jacking off.

Nuga

315,360 views • 1 month ago

An Amazing “Coincidence” American Cattle Rancher warned the USDA would use this Bird Flu outbreak to start the EID Tags on cattle mandate The USDA just mandated EID Tags on cattle & bison for the reason of “Disease Traceability” Another disease that was ALL ABOUT CONTROL “My cattle friends watched the feeder flash this morning. I warned a bunch of my friends when this bird flu bullshit come out and it is bullshit that EIDs were coming. The USDA come down on Friday is they have said that within six months, all sexually intact cattle, I mean all cattle, all beef cattle, every kind of cattle are going to have to be mandatory ID, EID tagged. It has to be a visible tag and electronically visible tag. And it's gonna be on all cattle, basically all breeding cattle. So our calves and yearlings are. Now, the only way that the USDA could implement this in six months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags they knew what they were doing they've accomplished what they were doing. This is bullsh*t and it really sucks for this, you know the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their in their backyard so we'll see what comes out of this but I guess you boys better we better get our taggers ready because we knew it was coming”

An Amazing “Coincidence” American Cattle Rancher warned the USDA would use this Bird Flu outbreak to start the EID Tags on cattle mandate The USDA just mandated EID Tags on cattle & bison for the reason of “Disease Traceability” Another disease that was ALL ABOUT CONTROL “My cattle friends watched the feeder flash this morning. I warned a bunch of my friends when this bird flu bullshit come out and it is bullshit that EIDs were coming. The USDA come down on Friday is they have said that within six months, all sexually intact cattle, I mean all cattle, all beef cattle, every kind of cattle are going to have to be mandatory ID, EID tagged. It has to be a visible tag and electronically visible tag. And it's gonna be on all cattle, basically all breeding cattle. So our calves and yearlings are. Now, the only way that the USDA could implement this in six months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags they knew what they were doing they've accomplished what they were doing. This is bullsh*t and it really sucks for this, you know the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their in their backyard so we'll see what comes out of this but I guess you boys better we better get our taggers ready because we knew it was coming”

Wall Street Apes

851,150 views • 2 years ago

There was a period when a Palestinian state could have been declared: before 1967, when Gaza was under Egyptian control and the West Bank under Jordanian rule. There was no Israeli occupation of those territories and no settlements. East Jerusalem was not under Israeli control. But no Palestinian state emerged. Later, after 1973, another opening appeared. Egypt pivoted from war to peace. Israel showed it was willing to trade land for recognition. Again, no Palestinian state. Why is that?

There was a period when a Palestinian state could have been declared: before 1967, when Gaza was under Egyptian control and the West Bank under Jordanian rule. There was no Israeli occupation of those territories and no settlements. East Jerusalem was not under Israeli control. But no Palestinian state emerged. Later, after 1973, another opening appeared. Egypt pivoted from war to peace. Israel showed it was willing to trade land for recognition. Again, no Palestinian state. Why is that?

Realign For Palestine

19,099 views • 4 months ago

Before Opay. Before Moniepoint. Before PalmPay. There was FlashMeCash. In 2002, Nigeria wasn't ready for fintech. There were no smartphones, no mobile apps, no digital banks and no QR codes. This was almost two decades before the fintech boom we know today. While the rest of the market was focused on traditional banking, someone was already imagining a future where money could move through a mobile device. Watch the full Money Brief on YouTube Nairametrics.tv

Before Opay. Before Moniepoint. Before PalmPay. There was FlashMeCash. In 2002, Nigeria wasn't ready for fintech. There were no smartphones, no mobile apps, no digital banks and no QR codes. This was almost two decades before the fintech boom we know today. While the rest of the market was focused on traditional banking, someone was already imagining a future where money could move through a mobile device. Watch the full Money Brief on YouTube Nairametrics.tv

Nairametrics

14,933 views • 1 month ago

“This land belongs to Julius Berger Plc, and when I looked at the records, 15 years ago they were given the property, and there was no development. I said, ‘Well, we want to build judges’ quarters, so give me this land.’ For 15 years, there was no development, so we took back our land. And all over social media, they were calling me a land grabber. I didn’t bother myself. I knew where I was going.”

“This land belongs to Julius Berger Plc, and when I looked at the records, 15 years ago they were given the property, and there was no development. I said, ‘Well, we want to build judges’ quarters, so give me this land.’ For 15 years, there was no development, so we took back our land. And all over social media, they were calling me a land grabber. I didn’t bother myself. I knew where I was going.”

TheCable

229,204 views • 2 months ago

A subpoenaed witness was allowed to appear voluntarily. No oath. No cameras. “I don’t recall” on repeat. And when we asked about Donald Trump and his administration, DOJ attorneys stepped in to shut it down. This wasn’t a hearing. It was structured to shield the truth.

A subpoenaed witness was allowed to appear voluntarily. No oath. No cameras. “I don’t recall” on repeat. And when we asked about Donald Trump and his administration, DOJ attorneys stepped in to shut it down. This wasn’t a hearing. It was structured to shield the truth.

Rep. Melanie Stansbury

128,026 views • 2 months ago

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “On Brown University, Mr. President, do you know what the motive of the shooter was? Is it — was it a targeted attack, sir?” President Trump: “No, we don’t. No. That's moving along now. And we don't. And we'll — we're going to see what happens. Hopefully they're going to capture this animal. Hopefully they're going to capture [him].”

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “On Brown University, Mr. President, do you know what the motive of the shooter was? Is it — was it a targeted attack, sir?” President Trump: “No, we don’t. No. That's moving along now. And we don't. And we'll — we're going to see what happens. Hopefully they're going to capture this animal. Hopefully they're going to capture [him].”

Curtis Houck

32,040 views • 8 months ago

At his peak, Mike Tyson was the most terrifying force the heavyweight division had ever seen. Blistering hand speed, relentless head movement, and knockout power in both fists let him close distance instantly and dismantle elite opponents in seconds. There was no time to adjust, no chance to breathe. What made these knockouts unforgettable wasn’t just the impact, it was the intimidation. Fighters stepped into the ring already under pressure, knowing one mistake could end everything. And with Tyson, it usually did. In his prime, one clean opening was all it took.

At his peak, Mike Tyson was the most terrifying force the heavyweight division had ever seen. Blistering hand speed, relentless head movement, and knockout power in both fists let him close distance instantly and dismantle elite opponents in seconds. There was no time to adjust, no chance to breathe. What made these knockouts unforgettable wasn’t just the impact, it was the intimidation. Fighters stepped into the ring already under pressure, knowing one mistake could end everything. And with Tyson, it usually did. In his prime, one clean opening was all it took.

Boxing Archives

34,392 views • 1 month ago

steven talking about the time he saw iu’s bleuming lyrics at the same filming location he had back in the day 🦊: you know, i really like IU sunbaenim's songs a lot~ back in the day, there was this shoot i had to do and the day before, IU sunbaenim had a filming there (in the same location). and there was this a4 paper so i looked at it and at the top it said 'blueming' and the lyrics were written all the way down.. but since it was just lyrics, there was no lee jieun written, no IU sunbaenim or anything like that either, so i was just like 'what is this? no way...' but in the song lyrics there was.. jieun—anyway sunbaenim's name was written on it. yeah so i was like 'ah i think this is it' but even after realizing that i didn't really get that flutter of excitement or anything. because i didn't know the song so i was just like 'ah the lyrics are good~' and that was it. and i probably tore that paper and threw it away 🐯: you did really well, you disposed it on her behalf 🦊: ㅎㅎㅎㅎ it's cute and funny how steven just tore up the paper since the song wasn't released yet at the time ᄏᄏᄏᄏ #아홉 #AHOF #스티븐 #STEVEN

steven talking about the time he saw iu’s bleuming lyrics at the same filming location he had back in the day 🦊: you know, i really like IU sunbaenim's songs a lot~ back in the day, there was this shoot i had to do and the day before, IU sunbaenim had a filming there (in the same location). and there was this a4 paper so i looked at it and at the top it said 'blueming' and the lyrics were written all the way down.. but since it was just lyrics, there was no lee jieun written, no IU sunbaenim or anything like that either, so i was just like 'what is this? no way...' but in the song lyrics there was.. jieun—anyway sunbaenim's name was written on it. yeah so i was like 'ah i think this is it' but even after realizing that i didn't really get that flutter of excitement or anything. because i didn't know the song so i was just like 'ah the lyrics are good~' and that was it. and i probably tore that paper and threw it away 🐯: you did really well, you disposed it on her behalf 🦊: ㅎㅎㅎㅎ it's cute and funny how steven just tore up the paper since the song wasn't released yet at the time ᄏᄏᄏᄏ #아홉 #AHOF #스티븐 #STEVEN

윈드 ᰔᩚ

27,583 views • 3 months ago