Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BITCOIN QUANTUM RISK IS GOVERNANCE, NOT CODE Binance founder CZ predicts $BTC will upgrade before quantum threats materialize. He says vulnerable Satoshi-era coins may face community consensus freeze or burn.

CryptosRus

301,452 subscribers

62,935 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Bilim & Teknoloji Finans

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

BINANCE FOUNDER CZ ISSUED A WARNING: “QUANTUM COMPUTING MAY BREAK EXISTING ENCRYPTION.” CURRENT CRYPTO SYSTEMS MAY BE AT RISK THE TIME FOR BITCOIN TO UPGRADE HAS COME

BINANCE FOUNDER CZ ISSUED A WARNING: “QUANTUM COMPUTING MAY BREAK EXISTING ENCRYPTION.” CURRENT CRYPTO SYSTEMS MAY BE AT RISK THE TIME FOR BITCOIN TO UPGRADE HAS COME

Vivek Sen

388,928 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

CZ Suggests Freezing Satoshi's Bitcoin to Address Quantum Threats Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ)CZ 🔶 BNB said in a June 18 interview with Galaxy that if Bitcoin forks in the future to adopt quantum-resistant cryptography, the community could give Satoshi-linked addresses holding about 1 million BTC a 6- to 12-month migration window. If the coins still do not move, the new protocol should freeze those addresses. CZ said that otherwise, the coins could eventually be claimed by the first person to crack the private keys with quantum computing. He acknowledged there is no perfect solution and said the final decision should be made by the community, potentially through miner signaling.

CZ Suggests Freezing Satoshi's Bitcoin to Address Quantum Threats Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ)CZ 🔶 BNB said in a June 18 interview with Galaxy that if Bitcoin forks in the future to adopt quantum-resistant cryptography, the community could give Satoshi-linked addresses holding about 1 million BTC a 6- to 12-month migration window. If the coins still do not move, the new protocol should freeze those addresses. CZ said that otherwise, the coins could eventually be claimed by the first person to crack the private keys with quantum computing. He acknowledged there is no perfect solution and said the final decision should be made by the community, potentially through miner signaling.

Wu Blockchain

67,549 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🔥 CZ: BITCOIN SHOULD FREEZE SATOSHI'S COINS IF THEY DON'T MOVE WITHIN A YEAR CZ suggests the Bitcoin community should give Satoshi a 12-month window to move his coins before a quantum upgrade, and freeze them permanently if they don't move. "On the new protocol, there will be like only 20 million coins because we're just going to lock them." He warned that doing nothing means "we're basically giving to somebody who's going to hack it" once quantum computing catches up.

🔥 CZ: BITCOIN SHOULD FREEZE SATOSHI'S COINS IF THEY DON'T MOVE WITHIN A YEAR CZ suggests the Bitcoin community should give Satoshi a 12-month window to move his coins before a quantum upgrade, and freeze them permanently if they don't move. "On the new protocol, there will be like only 20 million coins because we're just going to lock them." He warned that doing nothing means "we're basically giving to somebody who's going to hack it" once quantum computing catches up.

Coin Bureau

1,056,242 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: CZ SAYS SATOSHI’S $BTC SHOULD BE FROZEN FOR A YEAR IF BITCOIN EVER MOVES TO A QUANTUM-RESISTANT FORK. HE BELIEVES LOCKING THOSE COINS DURING THE TRANSITION WOULD BE THE SAFEST APPROACH. QUANTUM RISK IS QUICKLY BECOMING A REAL BITCOIN DEBATE.

🚨 BREAKING: CZ SAYS SATOSHI’S $BTC SHOULD BE FROZEN FOR A YEAR IF BITCOIN EVER MOVES TO A QUANTUM-RESISTANT FORK. HE BELIEVES LOCKING THOSE COINS DURING THE TRANSITION WOULD BE THE SAFEST APPROACH. QUANTUM RISK IS QUICKLY BECOMING A REAL BITCOIN DEBATE.

Finish 🏁

25,439 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?! In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary Binance founder CZ 🔶 BNB suggested something big. He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen. He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.

CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?! In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary Binance founder CZ 🔶 BNB suggested something big. He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen. He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.

BSCN

80,197 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🔥CHARLES HOSKINSON ON BITCOIN’S QUANTUM CRISIS: "TO DO NOTHING WOULD RESULT IN OVER 8 MILLION $BTC BEING STOLEN.” Hoskinson says Bitcoin cannot ignore the quantum threat forever. He suggested the network to either add optional post-quantum signatures, or freeze legacy accounts that fail to migrate. His bigger argument, however, was that Bitcoin lacks a clear governance layer to make that choice. During the Consensus Miami event, he warns of over 50% chance quantum computers could threaten crypto security by 2033.

🔥CHARLES HOSKINSON ON BITCOIN’S QUANTUM CRISIS: "TO DO NOTHING WOULD RESULT IN OVER 8 MILLION $BTC BEING STOLEN.” Hoskinson says Bitcoin cannot ignore the quantum threat forever. He suggested the network to either add optional post-quantum signatures, or freeze legacy accounts that fail to migrate. His bigger argument, however, was that Bitcoin lacks a clear governance layer to make that choice. During the Consensus Miami event, he warns of over 50% chance quantum computers could threaten crypto security by 2033.

Coin Bureau

87,013 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

SAYLOR JUST KILLED QUANTUM FUD Michael Saylor says Strategy is launching a #Bitcoin security program to coordinate with the global cyber, crypto, and $BTC security community. Key points he made: ⚡ Quantum computing is 10+ years away ⚡ The world already relies on the same cryptography Bitcoin uses ⚡ If Bitcoin ever needs an upgrade, it happens via global consensus Bitcoiners keep building through the noise. 💯

SAYLOR JUST KILLED QUANTUM FUD Michael Saylor says Strategy is launching a #Bitcoin security program to coordinate with the global cyber, crypto, and $BTC security community. Key points he made: ⚡ Quantum computing is 10+ years away ⚡ The world already relies on the same cryptography Bitcoin uses ⚡ If Bitcoin ever needs an upgrade, it happens via global consensus Bitcoiners keep building through the noise. 💯

CryptosRus

220,660 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

NICK CARTER JUST WARNED QUANTUM COMPUTING COULD FORCE AN EMERGENCY HARD FORK IN #BITCOIN “THE LARGEST INSTITUTIONS WILL STEP IN AND FORK TO FREEZE THE COINS” “IF SATOSHI'S COINS START MOVING, THEY WILL BE IMMOBILIZED” "IF THEY DO NOT THEY MAY BE FORCED TO DELIST BTC FROM THE LARGEST EXCHANGES" 👀

NICK CARTER JUST WARNED QUANTUM COMPUTING COULD FORCE AN EMERGENCY HARD FORK IN #BITCOIN “THE LARGEST INSTITUTIONS WILL STEP IN AND FORK TO FREEZE THE COINS” “IF SATOSHI'S COINS START MOVING, THEY WILL BE IMMOBILIZED” "IF THEY DO NOT THEY MAY BE FORCED TO DELIST BTC FROM THE LARGEST EXCHANGES" 👀

The Bitcoin Historian

63,840 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“Only two steps” required to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant? In this Unchained episode, Matt Corallo 🟠 joins me to discuss: ❌ Why he thinks Nic Carter is wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin ⛔ Why he disagrees with Nic on his ranking of Bitcoin’s most influential developers 😱 Why “the community at that time” will deal with the quantum threat 🥷 Why making bitcoin post-quantum might require a block size increase 🔥 Why he believes “you burn old lost coins, you burn anyone who hasn't migrated” Timestamps: 🚀0:00 Introduction ⚔️02:16 What Matt says Nic is getting wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin 🤔08:59 What Matt says Bitcoin's quantum security roadmap could look like 🫠19:04 Do Bitcoin Core developers have any timelines? 🤯29:34 Are there only two steps required to quantum-proof Bitcoin? 📍34:04 Matt weighs in on public comments from other Bitcoin developers on the quantum threat ⁉️47:37 Why Bitcoin Core has not announced a quantum team 👀53:57 Can BlackRock “fire” Bitcoin developers? 💫58:07 What Matt says is the North Star for Bitcoin developers 🔥1:07:42 What Matt thinks will happen to lost bitcoins 🤔1:08:26 Is there any plan to secure Bitcoin against AI? 👀1:11:31 Will Bitcoin and Ethereum align on quantum security?

“Only two steps” required to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant? In this Unchained episode, Matt Corallo 🟠 joins me to discuss: ❌ Why he thinks Nic Carter is wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin ⛔ Why he disagrees with Nic on his ranking of Bitcoin’s most influential developers 😱 Why “the community at that time” will deal with the quantum threat 🥷 Why making bitcoin post-quantum might require a block size increase 🔥 Why he believes “you burn old lost coins, you burn anyone who hasn't migrated” Timestamps: 🚀0:00 Introduction ⚔️02:16 What Matt says Nic is getting wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin 🤔08:59 What Matt says Bitcoin's quantum security roadmap could look like 🫠19:04 Do Bitcoin Core developers have any timelines? 🤯29:34 Are there only two steps required to quantum-proof Bitcoin? 📍34:04 Matt weighs in on public comments from other Bitcoin developers on the quantum threat ⁉️47:37 Why Bitcoin Core has not announced a quantum team 👀53:57 Can BlackRock “fire” Bitcoin developers? 💫58:07 What Matt says is the North Star for Bitcoin developers 🔥1:07:42 What Matt thinks will happen to lost bitcoins 🤔1:08:26 Is there any plan to secure Bitcoin against AI? 👀1:11:31 Will Bitcoin and Ethereum align on quantum security?

Laura Shin

19,795 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Conversation with nic carter to discuss the quantum risk for crypto, Ai math advancements, Satoshi's warning, and what comes next. 00:00 Intro 00:50 Bitcoin Investor Unrest 02:08 Finding Risks and Ideas Early 05:36 Why Bitcoin Needs Upgrade 07:10 Satoshi Warning About Quantum 10:06 What Quantum Computers Can Break 12:41 Crypto Market Examples 16:14 Lessons from the Bitcoin Cash Fork 17:49 The Unavoidable Risk for Bitcoin 19:54 Race Between China and US 22:01 The Base Case: Who Gets the BTC 25:21 Why BlackRock or Coinbase Can't Help 29:48 Michael Saylor Opinion of Quantum 34:29 Warning from Google 36:01 Are Altcoins like ZEC or ETH Safe? 38:20 How Markets Could React 41:22 Could This Boost Price 44:01 The Scariest Part About Quantum Risk 47:16 Is it Already Too Late? 48:41 How Ai is Accelerating Risk 50:08 What Happens Next

Conversation with nic carter to discuss the quantum risk for crypto, Ai math advancements, Satoshi's warning, and what comes next. 00:00 Intro 00:50 Bitcoin Investor Unrest 02:08 Finding Risks and Ideas Early 05:36 Why Bitcoin Needs Upgrade 07:10 Satoshi Warning About Quantum 10:06 What Quantum Computers Can Break 12:41 Crypto Market Examples 16:14 Lessons from the Bitcoin Cash Fork 17:49 The Unavoidable Risk for Bitcoin 19:54 Race Between China and US 22:01 The Base Case: Who Gets the BTC 25:21 Why BlackRock or Coinbase Can't Help 29:48 Michael Saylor Opinion of Quantum 34:29 Warning from Google 36:01 Are Altcoins like ZEC or ETH Safe? 38:20 How Markets Could React 41:22 Could This Boost Price 44:01 The Scariest Part About Quantum Risk 47:16 Is it Already Too Late? 48:41 How Ai is Accelerating Risk 50:08 What Happens Next

Luke Martin

92,345 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

🚨 THE U.S. GOVERNMENT JUST DID SOMETHING ABSOLUTELY INSANE Trump recently ordered America’s most important systems to begin abandoning cryptography that could be broken by quantum computers. Bitcoin relies on the same vulnerable class of cryptography. Now Bitcoin developers are discussing BIP 361. A proposal that could eventually restrict old wallets that fail to migrate to quantum-resistant addresses. That means lost coins, ancient whale wallets and potentially even Satoshi’s Bitcoin could become impossible to spend. Bitcoin may soon face its most controversial decision ever: Freeze billions of dollars in BTC… Or leave the network exposed to the largest theft in financial history. The government’s order never mentioned Bitcoin. But it may have officially started the clock.

🚨 THE U.S. GOVERNMENT JUST DID SOMETHING ABSOLUTELY INSANE Trump recently ordered America’s most important systems to begin abandoning cryptography that could be broken by quantum computers. Bitcoin relies on the same vulnerable class of cryptography. Now Bitcoin developers are discussing BIP 361. A proposal that could eventually restrict old wallets that fail to migrate to quantum-resistant addresses. That means lost coins, ancient whale wallets and potentially even Satoshi’s Bitcoin could become impossible to spend. Bitcoin may soon face its most controversial decision ever: Freeze billions of dollars in BTC… Or leave the network exposed to the largest theft in financial history. The government’s order never mentioned Bitcoin. But it may have officially started the clock.

Coinvo Trading

181,415 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

LIVE NOW - Ethereum’s Quantum Plan Before Q-Day Quantum is no longer a distant thought experiment. Justin Drake joins Bankless to unpack: - when Q-Day could actually arriv,e - why Bitcoin and Ethereum face very different quantum risks, - what Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap looks like, - why this upgrade could be bigger than the Merge, - and how quantum could become Ethereum’s chance to lead. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 When is Q-Day? 5:35 The moment quantum becomes crypto-relevant 10:11 How many qubits does it take to break crypto? 16:22 What a real Bitcoin quantum attack would look like 20:19 How much Bitcoin is actually vulnerable? 26:26 Burn, freeze, or salvage? Bitcoin’s impossible choice 35:06 Proof of seed phrase and Bitcoin’s post-quantum bottleneck 41:02 Ethereum’s exposure: smaller, but not zero 45:43 Ethereum’s tougher roadmap: three layers, three upgrades 50:29 The execution-layer plan: replace ECDSA without killing throughput 57:56 Post-quantum, post-AI cryptography 1:03:36 BLS, KZG, LeanVM, and the rest of the stack 1:06:42 Is this bigger than the Merge? 1:17:21 If Bitcoin stumbles, does all crypto stumble too? 1:19:35 “Quantum is not a challenge—it’s an opportunity” 1:21:27 AI, quantum, crypto and the 2032 convergence 1:28:04 Harvest now, decrypt later 1:30:09 Defensive accelerationism and Ethereum’s role 1:39:10 Stoicism, P-doom, and why he keeps building

LIVE NOW - Ethereum’s Quantum Plan Before Q-Day Quantum is no longer a distant thought experiment. Justin Drake joins Bankless to unpack: - when Q-Day could actually arriv,e - why Bitcoin and Ethereum face very different quantum risks, - what Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap looks like, - why this upgrade could be bigger than the Merge, - and how quantum could become Ethereum’s chance to lead. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 When is Q-Day? 5:35 The moment quantum becomes crypto-relevant 10:11 How many qubits does it take to break crypto? 16:22 What a real Bitcoin quantum attack would look like 20:19 How much Bitcoin is actually vulnerable? 26:26 Burn, freeze, or salvage? Bitcoin’s impossible choice 35:06 Proof of seed phrase and Bitcoin’s post-quantum bottleneck 41:02 Ethereum’s exposure: smaller, but not zero 45:43 Ethereum’s tougher roadmap: three layers, three upgrades 50:29 The execution-layer plan: replace ECDSA without killing throughput 57:56 Post-quantum, post-AI cryptography 1:03:36 BLS, KZG, LeanVM, and the rest of the stack 1:06:42 Is this bigger than the Merge? 1:17:21 If Bitcoin stumbles, does all crypto stumble too? 1:19:35 “Quantum is not a challenge—it’s an opportunity” 1:21:27 AI, quantum, crypto and the 2032 convergence 1:28:04 Harvest now, decrypt later 1:30:09 Defensive accelerationism and Ethereum’s role 1:39:10 Stoicism, P-doom, and why he keeps building

Bankless

50,230 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

TOM LEE SAID LIVE ON CNBC THAT #BITCOIN IS THE CRYPTO CURRENCY MOST AT RISK TO A SERIOUS QUANTUM ATTACK "GOOGLE SAYS THAT BY 2028 ALL ENCRYPTION COULD BREAK" "A LOT OF BLOCKCHAINS ARE DEVELOPING QUANTUM RESISTANCE." "IT IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM FOR ETHEREUM OR SOLANA" "BTC HAS NOT COME UP WITH A SOLUTION TO PREVENT Q-DAY" 👀

TOM LEE SAID LIVE ON CNBC THAT #BITCOIN IS THE CRYPTO CURRENCY MOST AT RISK TO A SERIOUS QUANTUM ATTACK "GOOGLE SAYS THAT BY 2028 ALL ENCRYPTION COULD BREAK" "A LOT OF BLOCKCHAINS ARE DEVELOPING QUANTUM RESISTANCE." "IT IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM FOR ETHEREUM OR SOLANA" "BTC HAS NOT COME UP WITH A SOLUTION TO PREVENT Q-DAY" 👀

The Bitcoin Historian

63,430 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"I love it when people who have absolutely no idea in the subject speak about the subject." Charles Hoskinson didn't just argue quantum is a real threat. He laid out his credentials and then walked through the math. → Worked on NIST standards → 250+ research publications → Wrote the first paper on Bitcoin vs. quantum adversary (2019) → Building post-quantum systems → References DARPA QBI: 11 companies through phase one → Greater than 50% probability of quantum capability by 2033 Bitcoin's three quantum options: → Option 1: Do nothing. Entire system breaks. → Option 2: Soft fork. Add post-quantum signatures. 15-20% of supply gets stolen from vulnerable legacy keys. → Option 3: BIP 361. Force migration. Freeze non-migrated coins. ~1.7 million BTC lost. Mostly Satoshi's.

"I love it when people who have absolutely no idea in the subject speak about the subject." Charles Hoskinson didn't just argue quantum is a real threat. He laid out his credentials and then walked through the math. → Worked on NIST standards → 250+ research publications → Wrote the first paper on Bitcoin vs. quantum adversary (2019) → Building post-quantum systems → References DARPA QBI: 11 companies through phase one → Greater than 50% probability of quantum capability by 2033 Bitcoin's three quantum options: → Option 1: Do nothing. Entire system breaks. → Option 2: Soft fork. Add post-quantum signatures. 15-20% of supply gets stolen from vulnerable legacy keys. → Option 3: BIP 361. Force migration. Freeze non-migrated coins. ~1.7 million BTC lost. Mostly Satoshi's.

The Rollup

41,181 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

31,148 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

If #Bitcoin goes to zero when the founder shows up, why didn't Apple collapse when Steve Jobs died ? That's the whole point of a decentralized system: it doesn't need its founder. Does Dan Pena not know this, or is he just farming clicks ? If Satoshi came back, the first thing he'd do is block Dan Pena. $BTC is code, not gossip.

If #Bitcoin goes to zero when the founder shows up, why didn't Apple collapse when Steve Jobs died ? That's the whole point of a decentralized system: it doesn't need its founder. Does Dan Pena not know this, or is he just farming clicks ? If Satoshi came back, the first thing he'd do is block Dan Pena. $BTC is code, not gossip.

ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ xʟᴀʀɢᴇ

30,788 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Bitcoin Rails x MARA Foundation presents: THE POLITICS OF POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Nic Carter 🔗 YouTube: 🌿Spotify: Less than nine months ago, investor and researcher nic carter sparked one of the most heated debates in Bitcoin's recent history — when he published a series of essays arguing that the network should prepare for its post-quantum transition sooner rather than later. While the essays broadly persuaded investors and institutions, many of Bitcoin's technical leaders dismissed them as alarmist — that is, until Google's quantum resource estimates were updated just a few months later. Crediting Google's paper with "shifting the Overton Window" on quantum and strengthening the case for post-quantum preparation, Nic shares his thoughts on the delicate politics surrounding this transition — and how he believes a quantum attack and response could potentially play out in practice. In more detail, this special episode of Bitcoin Rails X MARA Foundation TV covers: - How a quantum attack could realistically unfold + the different ways stakeholder groups might respond - The constitutional tensions surfaced by quantum vulnerable coins and how incentives will ultimately dictate outcomes - How a state actor could facilitate "benevolent" quantum recovery and eliminate the need for a contentious fork - The role and influence of institutional investors as key players in quantum outcomes - How Bitcoin's post-quantum transition could permanently reshape Bitcoin’s governance structures ...or build them from the ground up TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:18 — Nick's path from Fidelity to founding Castle Island 07:00 — How quantum went from FUD to Nick's biggest concern 12:45 — Why Core devs refuse to be accountable 26:09 — Investors vs developers: who took quantum seriously first 32:33 — Bitcoin's "pre-constitutional" governance problem 39:18 — Satoshi's coins: liquidate, burn, slow-bleed, or let the government take them 47:36 — Why there will never be another Bitcoin fork war 01:01:35 — Bitcoin is about to choose the wrong signature scheme 01:09:42 — The actual deadline: why PQ signatures need to ship in 2026 01:13:09 — The happy path, the coup, and why Bitcoin won't die

Bitcoin Rails x MARA Foundation presents: THE POLITICS OF POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Nic Carter 🔗 YouTube: 🌿Spotify: Less than nine months ago, investor and researcher nic carter sparked one of the most heated debates in Bitcoin's recent history — when he published a series of essays arguing that the network should prepare for its post-quantum transition sooner rather than later. While the essays broadly persuaded investors and institutions, many of Bitcoin's technical leaders dismissed them as alarmist — that is, until Google's quantum resource estimates were updated just a few months later. Crediting Google's paper with "shifting the Overton Window" on quantum and strengthening the case for post-quantum preparation, Nic shares his thoughts on the delicate politics surrounding this transition — and how he believes a quantum attack and response could potentially play out in practice. In more detail, this special episode of Bitcoin Rails X MARA Foundation TV covers: - How a quantum attack could realistically unfold + the different ways stakeholder groups might respond - The constitutional tensions surfaced by quantum vulnerable coins and how incentives will ultimately dictate outcomes - How a state actor could facilitate "benevolent" quantum recovery and eliminate the need for a contentious fork - The role and influence of institutional investors as key players in quantum outcomes - How Bitcoin's post-quantum transition could permanently reshape Bitcoin’s governance structures ...or build them from the ground up TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:18 — Nick's path from Fidelity to founding Castle Island 07:00 — How quantum went from FUD to Nick's biggest concern 12:45 — Why Core devs refuse to be accountable 26:09 — Investors vs developers: who took quantum seriously first 32:33 — Bitcoin's "pre-constitutional" governance problem 39:18 — Satoshi's coins: liquidate, burn, slow-bleed, or let the government take them 47:36 — Why there will never be another Bitcoin fork war 01:01:35 — Bitcoin is about to choose the wrong signature scheme 01:09:42 — The actual deadline: why PQ signatures need to ship in 2026 01:13:09 — The happy path, the coup, and why Bitcoin won't die

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

51,026 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

NEW: SHOULD WE FREEZE SATOSHI'S COINS? There's 1,000,000 #Bitcoin owned by Satoshi, but is it just a bounty for a quantum computer? This week, I sit down with Coinbase 🛡️ Head of Cryptography Yehuda Lindell to discuss the ethics of BTC's proposed quantum solutions. TLDR: "Not your keys, not your coins" may be over. Watch ⚡️ 00:00 Cold open 01:40 Why it's the abandoned coins, not Satoshi's 02:45 How many coins are actually at stake 05:17 The two extreme positions 07:07 Why Yehuda changed his mind 07:51 What "not your keys, not your coins" really means 10:30 The market impact argument 11:45 How a quantum attacker would behave 16:50 Does knowing a key make it yours? 21:06 The bank analogy 25:07 Lost coins versus coins that can't move 27:40 Proving ownership without elliptic curves 29:46 The Hourglass proposal 32:33 What "freezing" actually means 34:59 Why inaction doesn't preserve anything 38:52 The moment his position flipped 41:32 Coldcard, and what the protocol doesn't promise 49:26 Rizzo and Nathan wrap

NEW: SHOULD WE FREEZE SATOSHI'S COINS? There's 1,000,000 #Bitcoin owned by Satoshi, but is it just a bounty for a quantum computer? This week, I sit down with Coinbase 🛡️ Head of Cryptography Yehuda Lindell to discuss the ethics of BTC's proposed quantum solutions. TLDR: "Not your keys, not your coins" may be over. Watch ⚡️ 00:00 Cold open 01:40 Why it's the abandoned coins, not Satoshi's 02:45 How many coins are actually at stake 05:17 The two extreme positions 07:07 Why Yehuda changed his mind 07:51 What "not your keys, not your coins" really means 10:30 The market impact argument 11:45 How a quantum attacker would behave 16:50 Does knowing a key make it yours? 21:06 The bank analogy 25:07 Lost coins versus coins that can't move 27:40 Proving ownership without elliptic curves 29:46 The Hourglass proposal 32:33 What "freezing" actually means 34:59 Why inaction doesn't preserve anything 38:52 The moment his position flipped 41:32 Coldcard, and what the protocol doesn't promise 49:26 Rizzo and Nathan wrap

The Bitcoin Historian

26,987 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Can a sufficiently powerful quantum computer forge the signatures used to authorize Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions? What would it take to upgrade both networks before that happens? In this new lecture, Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh explores why blockchains may turn to signatures built from hash functions. He also presents new research on threshold signing. The talk ends with the questions Bitcoin still has to answer, including whether post-quantum signatures will require larger blocks, what happens to abandoned coins, and how someone such as Satoshi could prove ownership after Bitcoin’s current signatures have been retired. 00:00 Why blockchains need to prepare for quantum computers 03:05 Why Bitcoin may bet on hash-based signatures 06:25 The “big footgun” in stateful signatures 08:58 A quantum-safe signature that takes one billion hashes 14:13 Inside SLH-DSA’s virtual tree 20:30 How Bitcoin and Ethereum could make the switch 23:48 What happens when a wallet loses its state? 32:47 Can threshold signing survive the quantum transition? 36:39 How to hide lattice cryptography from the blockchain 38:49 Why threshold one-time signatures seem impossible 45:36 How context prevents forged signatures 49:37 The forgotten idea behind Winternitz signatures 54:50 Turning one-time signatures into threshold signatures 1:04:27 Will quantum-safe signatures require bigger Bitcoin blocks? 1:06:26 Abandoned bitcoin and Satoshi’s recovery problem

Can a sufficiently powerful quantum computer forge the signatures used to authorize Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions? What would it take to upgrade both networks before that happens? In this new lecture, Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh explores why blockchains may turn to signatures built from hash functions. He also presents new research on threshold signing. The talk ends with the questions Bitcoin still has to answer, including whether post-quantum signatures will require larger blocks, what happens to abandoned coins, and how someone such as Satoshi could prove ownership after Bitcoin’s current signatures have been retired. 00:00 Why blockchains need to prepare for quantum computers 03:05 Why Bitcoin may bet on hash-based signatures 06:25 The “big footgun” in stateful signatures 08:58 A quantum-safe signature that takes one billion hashes 14:13 Inside SLH-DSA’s virtual tree 20:30 How Bitcoin and Ethereum could make the switch 23:48 What happens when a wallet loses its state? 32:47 Can threshold signing survive the quantum transition? 36:39 How to hide lattice cryptography from the blockchain 38:49 Why threshold one-time signatures seem impossible 45:36 How context prevents forged signatures 49:37 The forgotten idea behind Winternitz signatures 54:50 Turning one-time signatures into threshold signatures 1:04:27 Will quantum-safe signatures require bigger Bitcoin blocks? 1:06:26 Abandoned bitcoin and Satoshi’s recovery problem

a16z crypto

120,741 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce