正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Breaking: HHS Terminates mRNA Vaccine Contracts—Citing “More Risk Than Benefit” Without warning, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dropped a bombshell: The U.S. government is ending its 5-year mRNA experiment. Key points: - 22 contracts canceled (nearly $500 million in funding). - HHS/NIH/FDA review concluded mRNA poses “more risk...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

352,070 subscribers

47,599 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

FDA just refused to file Moderna's mRNA seasonal flu vaccine application—and it's being seen as a major win for those skeptical of mRNA tech. The agency said the trial's control arm (standard-dose Fluarix comparator) didn't reflect the “best-available standard of care” in the US. No safety or efficacy red flags cited—just a procedural refusal to even begin review. Moderna calls it inconsistent with prior FDA feedback and is requesting a meeting. But the refusal means no fast-track path for now. This comes after the Trump admin canceled hundreds of millions in mRNA projects and installed RFK Jr. at HHS—plus a new CBER director (Vinay Prasad) known for sharp criticism of Covid-era vaccine policy. For critics of mRNA expansion into seasonal flu shots, this looks like the brakes finally being applied. Do you see this as overdue accountability for mRNA platforms… or an overreach that slows innovation?
0:37

FDA just refused to file Moderna's mRNA seasonal flu vaccine application—and it's being seen as a major win for those skeptical of mRNA tech. The agency said the trial's control arm (standard-dose Fluarix comparator) didn't reflect the “best-available standard of care” in the US. No safety or efficacy red flags cited—just a procedural refusal to even begin review. Moderna calls it inconsistent with prior FDA feedback and is requesting a meeting. But the refusal means no fast-track path for now. This comes after the Trump admin canceled hundreds of millions in mRNA projects and installed RFK Jr. at HHS—plus a new CBER director (Vinay Prasad) known for sharp criticism of Covid-era vaccine policy. For critics of mRNA expansion into seasonal flu shots, this looks like the brakes finally being applied. Do you see this as overdue accountability for mRNA platforms… or an overreach that slows innovation?

Camus

14,787 次观看 • 5 个月前

New Analysis: 2-4x Greater Risk of Serious Harm from mRNA Vaccine Than COVID Hospitalization A bombshell re-examination of the original Pfizer and Moderna trial data has reached a conclusion that demands urgent public attention. According to renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an independent study published in Vaccine (2022) found a staggering inverse risk-benefit profile. The analysis, led by experts including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, revealed that during the trials, an individual was two to four times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event—defined as disability, life-changing injury, or hospitalization—from the mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID-19. This critical research is now central to the argument that the vaccines may have caused more net harm than good. Dr. Malhotra suggests that had this independent analysis been possible before emergency authorization—without the influence of industry-funded regulators—the vaccines may not have been approved for a single person. This data is no longer just a scientific discussion; it is actively shaping policy, informing recent actions by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within the U.S. HHS. It points to a catastrophic failure in the risk-benefit analysis that underpinned global mandates. The imperative now is a full, transparent, and independent review of all data. The public health establishment must be held accountable for decisions made on flawed premises.
1:42

New Analysis: 2-4x Greater Risk of Serious Harm from mRNA Vaccine Than COVID Hospitalization A bombshell re-examination of the original Pfizer and Moderna trial data has reached a conclusion that demands urgent public attention. According to renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an independent study published in Vaccine (2022) found a staggering inverse risk-benefit profile. The analysis, led by experts including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, revealed that during the trials, an individual was two to four times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event—defined as disability, life-changing injury, or hospitalization—from the mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID-19. This critical research is now central to the argument that the vaccines may have caused more net harm than good. Dr. Malhotra suggests that had this independent analysis been possible before emergency authorization—without the influence of industry-funded regulators—the vaccines may not have been approved for a single person. This data is no longer just a scientific discussion; it is actively shaping policy, informing recent actions by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within the U.S. HHS. It points to a catastrophic failure in the risk-benefit analysis that underpinned global mandates. The imperative now is a full, transparent, and independent review of all data. The public health establishment must be held accountable for decisions made on flawed premises.

Camus

22,222 次观看 • 10 个月前

The reckoning on mRNA COVID shots has arrived. Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole applauds a bold new move by the government to halt funding for dangerous gene therapies, specifically naming the failed mRNA platform as a technology of the past. This pivotal shift redirects half a billion dollars to finally help those harmed. This isn't about judgment; it's about justice and healing for the millions left suffering in the wake of these shots. The legacy media will attack. Big Pharma investors will be furious. But this is a battle for human health, not profit. We are now fighting for: - NIH funding for the studies on mRNA vaccine injuries they ignored. - Cures and remedies for those suffering from side effects. - A new era of safer, more effective medical technology. The message is clear: the dangerous era of mRNA gene therapies for respiratory viruses is over. The future is about ethical science, superior technology, and never forgetting the victims of this failed experiment.
2:21

The reckoning on mRNA COVID shots has arrived. Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole applauds a bold new move by the government to halt funding for dangerous gene therapies, specifically naming the failed mRNA platform as a technology of the past. This pivotal shift redirects half a billion dollars to finally help those harmed. This isn't about judgment; it's about justice and healing for the millions left suffering in the wake of these shots. The legacy media will attack. Big Pharma investors will be furious. But this is a battle for human health, not profit. We are now fighting for: - NIH funding for the studies on mRNA vaccine injuries they ignored. - Cures and remedies for those suffering from side effects. - A new era of safer, more effective medical technology. The message is clear: the dangerous era of mRNA gene therapies for respiratory viruses is over. The future is about ethical science, superior technology, and never forgetting the victims of this failed experiment.

Camus

33,831 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 RFK Jr. reveals the Covid shots may have PROLONGED the pandemic—and reveals why HHS halted all mRNA shots for upper respiratory viruses: “The public health agencies have not been honest.” “There’s over 5,000 peer-reviewed studies that are documenting injuries or supposed injuries from the vaccine.” “This is the reason that we discontinued the platform—again, only for upper respiratory.” “It did not prove very effective during Covid.” “It targets a single protein, which means that all the virus has to do is to mutate out that protein, and then the virus is immune to the vaccine.” “That's what happened with Omicron." “It actually encourages the virus to mutate and prolongs the pandemic.” “What the mRNA vaccine does is it turns your body into an antigen factory, and … [it could] end up in organs where it’s not supposed to work and cause injury.” Secretary Kennedy
2:52

🚨 RFK Jr. reveals the Covid shots may have PROLONGED the pandemic—and reveals why HHS halted all mRNA shots for upper respiratory viruses: “The public health agencies have not been honest.” “There’s over 5,000 peer-reviewed studies that are documenting injuries or supposed injuries from the vaccine.” “This is the reason that we discontinued the platform—again, only for upper respiratory.” “It did not prove very effective during Covid.” “It targets a single protein, which means that all the virus has to do is to mutate out that protein, and then the virus is immune to the vaccine.” “That's what happened with Omicron." “It actually encourages the virus to mutate and prolongs the pandemic.” “What the mRNA vaccine does is it turns your body into an antigen factory, and … [it could] end up in organs where it’s not supposed to work and cause injury.” Secretary Kennedy

Children’s Health Defense

125,689 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 Don’t Be Fooled: HHS Just Opened the Door to the Next Pandemic 🚨 Yes, it’s true—HHS terminated 22 mRNA vaccine projects worth nearly $500M, citing failure to protect against COVID and flu. But this isn’t the victory some are claiming. Behind the headlines, the Biden/Kennedy administration is quietly allowing select mRNA contracts to continue—including a bird flu shot developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, backed by BARDA, Bill Gates, and fast-tracked by Trump’s FDA. This jab—ARCT-2304—is self-replicating mRNA. It was approved by the FDA in November 2024, fast-tracked in April 2025, and is the only Arcturus vaccine candidate currently listed in government contracts. In this video, I break down: -Why the bird flu shot is the only mRNA project allowed to continue -How this connects to a planned pandemic using lab-enhanced H5N1 -The timeline of government actions pointing toward orchestration -Why the cancellation announcement is just “bread before the meal” -And how Gates, BARDA, and the Trump & Kennedy teams are all involved They want you to think mRNA is done. It’s not. It’s mutating. And it’s being funneled into pandemic prep 2.0—with YOU funding it. Watch, share, and stay vigilant. Substack article: Nicolas Hulscher, MPH McCullough Foundation Alex Jones Dana Loesch Children’s Health Defense James Thorp MD The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Liz Churchill Emerald Robinson ✝️ Concerned Citizen Mary Talley Bowden MD Candace Owens Tucker Carlson Owen Shroyer Harrison H. Smith ✞ Secretary Kennedy m o d e r n i t y zerohedge HealthRanger Ann Vandersteel™️ Jon Bowne Sayer Ji Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. Jim Haslam Nurse Michele Talks #HHS #BirdFlu #mRNA #BARDA #Arcturus #ARCT2304 #BillGates #GainOfFunction #VaccineInjury #SelfReplicatingmRNA #Kennedy #Trump #FDA #PandemicPrep #COVID #Flu #Biowarfare #VaccineMandates #InformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #Biosecurity #DepopulationAgenda #BigPharma #Exposed
19:52

🚨 Don’t Be Fooled: HHS Just Opened the Door to the Next Pandemic 🚨 Yes, it’s true—HHS terminated 22 mRNA vaccine projects worth nearly $500M, citing failure to protect against COVID and flu. But this isn’t the victory some are claiming. Behind the headlines, the Biden/Kennedy administration is quietly allowing select mRNA contracts to continue—including a bird flu shot developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, backed by BARDA, Bill Gates, and fast-tracked by Trump’s FDA. This jab—ARCT-2304—is self-replicating mRNA. It was approved by the FDA in November 2024, fast-tracked in April 2025, and is the only Arcturus vaccine candidate currently listed in government contracts. In this video, I break down: -Why the bird flu shot is the only mRNA project allowed to continue -How this connects to a planned pandemic using lab-enhanced H5N1 -The timeline of government actions pointing toward orchestration -Why the cancellation announcement is just “bread before the meal” -And how Gates, BARDA, and the Trump & Kennedy teams are all involved They want you to think mRNA is done. It’s not. It’s mutating. And it’s being funneled into pandemic prep 2.0—with YOU funding it. Watch, share, and stay vigilant. Substack article: Nicolas Hulscher, MPH McCullough Foundation Alex Jones Dana Loesch Children’s Health Defense James Thorp MD The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Liz Churchill Emerald Robinson ✝️ Concerned Citizen Mary Talley Bowden MD Candace Owens Tucker Carlson Owen Shroyer Harrison H. Smith ✞ Secretary Kennedy m o d e r n i t y zerohedge HealthRanger Ann Vandersteel™️ Jon Bowne Sayer Ji Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. Jim Haslam Nurse Michele Talks #HHS #BirdFlu #mRNA #BARDA #Arcturus #ARCT2304 #BillGates #GainOfFunction #VaccineInjury #SelfReplicatingmRNA #Kennedy #Trump #FDA #PandemicPrep #COVID #Flu #Biowarfare #VaccineMandates #InformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #Biosecurity #DepopulationAgenda #BigPharma #Exposed

Jon Fleetwood

41,397 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Conclusion is Inescapable: When You Replace the 50% Relative Risk with the 2% Absolute Risk, the COVID Vaccine Narrative Collapses. This was the great statistical deception deployed for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulators and pharmaceutical companies had a choice: report Absolute Risk Reduction (the real-world benefit) or Relative Risk Reduction (the impressive-sounding headline). They consistently chose the latter to frame the vaccines as a monumental success. Let's break down the math that shaped global policy: • Absolute Risk (The Truth in Context): If your risk of symptomatic COVID drops from a baseline of 3% to 1% after the shot, that is a 2% Absolute Risk Reduction. This is the tangible difference for an individual. • Relative Risk (The Manipulated Headline): That same change is spun as a "50% improvement." The benefit appears revolutionary, while the real-world impact for the individual is far more modest. This was not a minor oversight. It was a calculated communication strategy that obscured the true, absolute benefit of the mRNA products. As analyst Leslie Manookian warned, those who read the initial trial data saw this immediately. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mild symptoms, yet the efficacy was marketed to the public using this statistical sleight-of-hand. The story of overwhelming, individual benefit only holds under the lens of relative risk. Under the harsh, transparent light of absolute risk, the narrative shifts dramatically. Demanding this transparency for COVID-19 vaccines isn't anti-science—it is the bedrock of true scientific and informed consent.
1:04

The Conclusion is Inescapable: When You Replace the 50% Relative Risk with the 2% Absolute Risk, the COVID Vaccine Narrative Collapses. This was the great statistical deception deployed for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulators and pharmaceutical companies had a choice: report Absolute Risk Reduction (the real-world benefit) or Relative Risk Reduction (the impressive-sounding headline). They consistently chose the latter to frame the vaccines as a monumental success. Let's break down the math that shaped global policy: • Absolute Risk (The Truth in Context): If your risk of symptomatic COVID drops from a baseline of 3% to 1% after the shot, that is a 2% Absolute Risk Reduction. This is the tangible difference for an individual. • Relative Risk (The Manipulated Headline): That same change is spun as a "50% improvement." The benefit appears revolutionary, while the real-world impact for the individual is far more modest. This was not a minor oversight. It was a calculated communication strategy that obscured the true, absolute benefit of the mRNA products. As analyst Leslie Manookian warned, those who read the initial trial data saw this immediately. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mild symptoms, yet the efficacy was marketed to the public using this statistical sleight-of-hand. The story of overwhelming, individual benefit only holds under the lens of relative risk. Under the harsh, transparent light of absolute risk, the narrative shifts dramatically. Demanding this transparency for COVID-19 vaccines isn't anti-science—it is the bedrock of true scientific and informed consent.

Camus

25,891 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: In a MASSIVE MAHA move, the Trump and Kennedy HHS is DROPPING the number of vaccines it recommends for every single child in America SEC RFK JR: “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.” O’Neill: "They went from 23 doses for 7 diseases in 1980 to more than 80 doses for 18 diseases!" 🤯 The CDC will still recommend: measles, polio, whooping cough, human papillomavirus or HPV, and chickenpox
2:24

🚨 BREAKING: In a MASSIVE MAHA move, the Trump and Kennedy HHS is DROPPING the number of vaccines it recommends for every single child in America SEC RFK JR: “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.” O’Neill: "They went from 23 doses for 7 diseases in 1980 to more than 80 doses for 18 diseases!" 🤯 The CDC will still recommend: measles, polio, whooping cough, human papillomavirus or HPV, and chickenpox

Eric Daugherty

49,455 次观看 • 6 个月前

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just dropped Covid stats that should make anyone who still supports the Covid vaccines stop and think. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)
1:23

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just dropped Covid stats that should make anyone who still supports the Covid vaccines stop and think. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)

MAHA Action

196,683 次观看 • 10 个月前

It’s embarrassing to watch the TGA tie itself up in knots and contradict itself over the safety of the vaccine. The mRNA vaccine is designed to attack your own cells because the antigen sits on the cell membrane. The T-cell which responds to the vaccine antigen can’t separate your cell from the spike protein. It kills both and the TGA has already admitted as much in the past conceding myocarditis is an autoimmune response. The spike proteins are not rapidly degraded as numerous studies have shown they last in the body for up to 60 days. But more importantly the mRNA is designed to last much longer and produce more proteins. This means the body produces a much larger concentration of the toxic spike protein than what the virus would have delivered. And I quote from one study: “Later studies documented similar effects for 5-methylcytidine and 2-thiouridine and observed that modified mRNAs produced 10- to 100-fold more protein compared with unmodified mRNAs. Recently, N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), the modification used in the current mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, was found to possess superior characteristics to Ψ; m1Ψ elicited less immunogenicity and increased protein production by more than an order of magnitude relative to Ψ.” And another on the Poly-A tail increases the duration. “Whether for the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNtech® laboratories or that of Moderna®, the two mRNA sequences end in a Poly(A) tail. The purpose of this addition is to increase the stability of the mRNA in biological medium and also to allow the recruitment of the ribosome, in order to initiate an efficient translation. After translation, the mRNA can be reused several times, but when this happens, it also loses part of the Adenines of its Poly(A) tail, as enzymatic degradation begins there, which only ensures a transient protection against this degradation. When this tail is too degraded, the mRNA is no longer functional and is destroyed. The poly(A) tail stabilizes mRNA and boosts protein translation, and the length of the poly(A) tail is proportional to translation efficiency. It is a critical factor in determining the longevity of mRNA molecules.” Long story short - the TGA continues to lie. Quotes from: #auspol
2:19

It’s embarrassing to watch the TGA tie itself up in knots and contradict itself over the safety of the vaccine. The mRNA vaccine is designed to attack your own cells because the antigen sits on the cell membrane. The T-cell which responds to the vaccine antigen can’t separate your cell from the spike protein. It kills both and the TGA has already admitted as much in the past conceding myocarditis is an autoimmune response. The spike proteins are not rapidly degraded as numerous studies have shown they last in the body for up to 60 days. But more importantly the mRNA is designed to last much longer and produce more proteins. This means the body produces a much larger concentration of the toxic spike protein than what the virus would have delivered. And I quote from one study: “Later studies documented similar effects for 5-methylcytidine and 2-thiouridine and observed that modified mRNAs produced 10- to 100-fold more protein compared with unmodified mRNAs. Recently, N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), the modification used in the current mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, was found to possess superior characteristics to Ψ; m1Ψ elicited less immunogenicity and increased protein production by more than an order of magnitude relative to Ψ.” And another on the Poly-A tail increases the duration. “Whether for the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNtech® laboratories or that of Moderna®, the two mRNA sequences end in a Poly(A) tail. The purpose of this addition is to increase the stability of the mRNA in biological medium and also to allow the recruitment of the ribosome, in order to initiate an efficient translation. After translation, the mRNA can be reused several times, but when this happens, it also loses part of the Adenines of its Poly(A) tail, as enzymatic degradation begins there, which only ensures a transient protection against this degradation. When this tail is too degraded, the mRNA is no longer functional and is destroyed. The poly(A) tail stabilizes mRNA and boosts protein translation, and the length of the poly(A) tail is proportional to translation efficiency. It is a critical factor in determining the longevity of mRNA molecules.” Long story short - the TGA continues to lie. Quotes from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

62,522 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.
1:42

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.

Camus

46,957 次观看 • 10 个月前

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just shared Covid stats so alarming they could make even the staunchest vaccine defender think twice. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” Dr Aseem Malhotra
1:38

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just shared Covid stats so alarming they could make even the staunchest vaccine defender think twice. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” Dr Aseem Malhotra

Children’s Health Defense

131,183 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 “THE STRONGEST EVIDENCE YET” — Nicholas Hulcher drops a bombshell Nicholas Hulcher (McCullough Foundation): “These new studies are devastating. One shows the mRNA shots destroy the kidneys. We suspected it — now it’s confirmed. The other? A study of 51 million people — the entire population of South Korea. It shows the clearest signal yet of Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome — VAIDS. And it’s dose-dependent: The more shots you took, the weaker your immune system became. Children suffered the worst — 4 doses = up to a 600% increase in viral infections, respiratory disease, tuberculosis, and more. This is the strongest study of its kind. We can now say confidently: These shots induce VAIDS. They exhaust your T-cells. They severely impair immune function — and the effect is long-lasting. All of this will be on the table when tribunals come.” Jim Ferguson: “It’s horrifying. Kids facing 600% higher infection risk? That’s monstrous. Millions have died. Millions more are vaccine-injured. If VAIDS is now emerging as a major consequence, then there must be accountability. Justice must be done.” Nicholas Hulcher: “We made progress early this year — Dr Stephen Hatfill pulled federal funding for mRNA respiratory vaccines, and ACIP withdrew universal recommendations. But now… things have stalled. HHS is still compromised. States are still pushing mRNA onto babies. And unless this stops, the penalties — when the truth finally breaks — will be severe.” Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
3:45

🚨 “THE STRONGEST EVIDENCE YET” — Nicholas Hulcher drops a bombshell Nicholas Hulcher (McCullough Foundation): “These new studies are devastating. One shows the mRNA shots destroy the kidneys. We suspected it — now it’s confirmed. The other? A study of 51 million people — the entire population of South Korea. It shows the clearest signal yet of Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome — VAIDS. And it’s dose-dependent: The more shots you took, the weaker your immune system became. Children suffered the worst — 4 doses = up to a 600% increase in viral infections, respiratory disease, tuberculosis, and more. This is the strongest study of its kind. We can now say confidently: These shots induce VAIDS. They exhaust your T-cells. They severely impair immune function — and the effect is long-lasting. All of this will be on the table when tribunals come.” Jim Ferguson: “It’s horrifying. Kids facing 600% higher infection risk? That’s monstrous. Millions have died. Millions more are vaccine-injured. If VAIDS is now emerging as a major consequence, then there must be accountability. Justice must be done.” Nicholas Hulcher: “We made progress early this year — Dr Stephen Hatfill pulled federal funding for mRNA respiratory vaccines, and ACIP withdrew universal recommendations. But now… things have stalled. HHS is still compromised. States are still pushing mRNA onto babies. And unless this stops, the penalties — when the truth finally breaks — will be severe.” Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Jim Ferguson

55,417 次观看 • 8 个月前

Aaron Siri exposes a staggering 38-year failure in vaccine safety oversight mandated by Congress. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act provided liability protection to vaccine manufacturers. In exchange, the law placed the entire responsibility for ensuring vaccine safety squarely on the government, specifically the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The act had three core mandates for HHS: 1. The Requirement: To actively work to make vaccines safer. 2. The Reporting: To submit a biannual report to Congress detailing how its agencies (FDA, CDC, NIH) had improved vaccine safety over the previous two years. 3. The Task Force: To convene a task force of the heads of NIH, CDC, and FDA to recommend further safety improvements to the HHS Secretary. The results? A complete abdication of duty. ➡️ The Biannual Reports: The legal requirement for biannual safety reports to Congress has existed since 1986. The total number of reports ever submitted? ZERO. ➡️ The Task Force: This key safety committee was formed but made only one set of recommendations in 1998 before being disbanded. It was only recently reconstituted, missing in action for most of its mandated existence. This isn't just a bureaucratic oversight; it's a fundamental breach of a public trust. Congress removed the market incentive for safety by shielding manufacturers from liability, trusting HHS to be the backstop. If HHS can’t even perform the simple, transparent tasks of reporting and convening a task force, how can the public have confidence it is doing the hard work of actively ensuring safety? The law was a bargain. The industry got protection. The American people were promised unparalleled safety oversight in return. They are still waiting.
1:45

Aaron Siri exposes a staggering 38-year failure in vaccine safety oversight mandated by Congress. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act provided liability protection to vaccine manufacturers. In exchange, the law placed the entire responsibility for ensuring vaccine safety squarely on the government, specifically the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The act had three core mandates for HHS: 1. The Requirement: To actively work to make vaccines safer. 2. The Reporting: To submit a biannual report to Congress detailing how its agencies (FDA, CDC, NIH) had improved vaccine safety over the previous two years. 3. The Task Force: To convene a task force of the heads of NIH, CDC, and FDA to recommend further safety improvements to the HHS Secretary. The results? A complete abdication of duty. ➡️ The Biannual Reports: The legal requirement for biannual safety reports to Congress has existed since 1986. The total number of reports ever submitted? ZERO. ➡️ The Task Force: This key safety committee was formed but made only one set of recommendations in 1998 before being disbanded. It was only recently reconstituted, missing in action for most of its mandated existence. This isn't just a bureaucratic oversight; it's a fundamental breach of a public trust. Congress removed the market incentive for safety by shielding manufacturers from liability, trusting HHS to be the backstop. If HHS can’t even perform the simple, transparent tasks of reporting and convening a task force, how can the public have confidence it is doing the hard work of actively ensuring safety? The law was a bargain. The industry got protection. The American people were promised unparalleled safety oversight in return. They are still waiting.

Camus

42,962 次观看 • 10 个月前

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: U.S. Government Accountability Office Director Admits GAO Staff “Stole & Backed Up” Vaccine Data Allegedly Deleted by RFK Jr.’s HHS - Possible Violations of Federal Records, Theft, & CFAA Laws. Steven Putansu, a 16-year veteran of the U.S. Government Accountability Office & current Assistant Director, revealed a covert effort inside GAO to preserve vaccine research data. Putansu admitted on hidden camera GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control - a potential violation of several federal statutes, including: - Unauthorized Removal or Destruction of Public Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071) - Theft or Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641) - Computer Fraud & Abuse Act - CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030) for accessing or copying government data without authorization. “We've stolen & backed those things up so that someday they can come back to government.” “I'd watch out for the vaccine denying HHS who's going to ruin health care in this country even more than it already is.” “It limits the amount of permanent damage… research he’s trying to delete is stored outside his control.” U.S. GAO Will Chamberlain The Article III Project (A3P) Secretary Kennedy HHS
7:46

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: U.S. Government Accountability Office Director Admits GAO Staff “Stole & Backed Up” Vaccine Data Allegedly Deleted by RFK Jr.’s HHS - Possible Violations of Federal Records, Theft, & CFAA Laws. Steven Putansu, a 16-year veteran of the U.S. Government Accountability Office & current Assistant Director, revealed a covert effort inside GAO to preserve vaccine research data. Putansu admitted on hidden camera GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control - a potential violation of several federal statutes, including: - Unauthorized Removal or Destruction of Public Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071) - Theft or Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641) - Computer Fraud & Abuse Act - CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030) for accessing or copying government data without authorization. “We've stolen & backed those things up so that someday they can come back to government.” “I'd watch out for the vaccine denying HHS who's going to ruin health care in this country even more than it already is.” “It limits the amount of permanent damage… research he’s trying to delete is stored outside his control.” U.S. GAO Will Chamberlain The Article III Project (A3P) Secretary Kennedy HHS

James O'Keefe

1,411,888 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨🚨🚨 WAR ON MAHA - Instead of putting Bill Gates in jail, the Administration is re-engaging with GAVI to poison people in Africa with Ebola using more mRNA kill shots. Gates is currently pushing more mRNA poisons to deal with the new strain of Ebola despite the endless safety issues we are finally hearing about with the COVID vaccines. No mRNA vaccine has yet to be demonstrated as safe or effective in any legitimate long-term study, yet the administration is partnering with GAVI to make more. Gates has been in trouble for legal and ethical violations due to his lack of ethics in his vaccine work in both Africa and India. He has talked about people as useless eaters and is funding GMO ticks and mosquitoes that we are releasing on the public. Bill Gates has talked eagerly about reducing the population of the Earth by 3 billion people with “better” food, medicine, and vaccines (“fact-checkers” claim this was out of context but he said it numerous times in different videos). Why would we betray MAHA like this? Why is Rubio pushing this corruption? Why is RFK not fighting back on this foundational issue? The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Alex Jones
0:43

🚨🚨🚨 WAR ON MAHA - Instead of putting Bill Gates in jail, the Administration is re-engaging with GAVI to poison people in Africa with Ebola using more mRNA kill shots. Gates is currently pushing more mRNA poisons to deal with the new strain of Ebola despite the endless safety issues we are finally hearing about with the COVID vaccines. No mRNA vaccine has yet to be demonstrated as safe or effective in any legitimate long-term study, yet the administration is partnering with GAVI to make more. Gates has been in trouble for legal and ethical violations due to his lack of ethics in his vaccine work in both Africa and India. He has talked about people as useless eaters and is funding GMO ticks and mosquitoes that we are releasing on the public. Bill Gates has talked eagerly about reducing the population of the Earth by 3 billion people with “better” food, medicine, and vaccines (“fact-checkers” claim this was out of context but he said it numerous times in different videos). Why would we betray MAHA like this? Why is Rubio pushing this corruption? Why is RFK not fighting back on this foundational issue? The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Alex Jones

Tom Renz

50,436 次观看 • 1 个月前

Dr. Sara Brenner, a top FDA official since 2019 and now Principal Deputy Commissioner, made a stunning admission at a recent event: she refused the COVID-19 vaccine while pregnant, citing serious concerns about its biodistribution and potential excretion in breast milk. As a nanobiotechnology expert and former Acting FDA Commissioner (Jan 2025), she was in a position to know the risks—and she chose to protect her child. Brenner says her concerns were later validated by studies (2022 & 2023) showing mRNA from Pfizer/Moderna vaccines in breast milk. Yet, the FDA and CDC continued pushing these shots for pregnant women, despite her private doubts as a senior official. Why didn’t she speak out sooner to warn others? Thousands of pregnant women took the vaccine to keep jobs or follow mandates, unaware of risks she suspected. This raises critical questions: - Why did the FDA suppress uncertainties about vaccine safety for pregnant women? - How many other insiders shared Brenner’s doubts but stayed silent? - Why are routine COVID vaccinations still recommended for pregnant women when even the CDC is now backing off? Brenner calls the pandemic era a “dark time” and promises a “new dawn” of transparency under leaders like HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. But trust in public health is shattered. Her silence then, and admission now, demand accountability.
1:52

Dr. Sara Brenner, a top FDA official since 2019 and now Principal Deputy Commissioner, made a stunning admission at a recent event: she refused the COVID-19 vaccine while pregnant, citing serious concerns about its biodistribution and potential excretion in breast milk. As a nanobiotechnology expert and former Acting FDA Commissioner (Jan 2025), she was in a position to know the risks—and she chose to protect her child. Brenner says her concerns were later validated by studies (2022 & 2023) showing mRNA from Pfizer/Moderna vaccines in breast milk. Yet, the FDA and CDC continued pushing these shots for pregnant women, despite her private doubts as a senior official. Why didn’t she speak out sooner to warn others? Thousands of pregnant women took the vaccine to keep jobs or follow mandates, unaware of risks she suspected. This raises critical questions: - Why did the FDA suppress uncertainties about vaccine safety for pregnant women? - How many other insiders shared Brenner’s doubts but stayed silent? - Why are routine COVID vaccinations still recommended for pregnant women when even the CDC is now backing off? Brenner calls the pandemic era a “dark time” and promises a “new dawn” of transparency under leaders like HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. But trust in public health is shattered. Her silence then, and admission now, demand accountability.

Camus

92,617 次观看 • 1 年前

Yes, many of us celebrated this—and for good reason. For only the second time in history, a vaccine has been removed from the CDC’s schedule. The last time that happened was in 1999 with the RotaShield vaccine. This is rare. This is significant. It means the door has cracked open but it doesn’t mean the battle is over. ALL mRNA and saRNA shots need to be banned. This is only the first step in a long road ahead. The majority of the public still believes the old narrative—that vaccines are always safe and effective. They don’t yet see the harm. But every shift like this brings more truth to light. We wanted the entire house of cards to fall. But even removing one shot? That’s never happened since 1999. It’s unprecedented in the modern era. Pray for Bobby. He’s facing pressures most can’t imagine. Does the world even realize what he’s standing against?
2:17

Yes, many of us celebrated this—and for good reason. For only the second time in history, a vaccine has been removed from the CDC’s schedule. The last time that happened was in 1999 with the RotaShield vaccine. This is rare. This is significant. It means the door has cracked open but it doesn’t mean the battle is over. ALL mRNA and saRNA shots need to be banned. This is only the first step in a long road ahead. The majority of the public still believes the old narrative—that vaccines are always safe and effective. They don’t yet see the harm. But every shift like this brings more truth to light. We wanted the entire house of cards to fall. But even removing one shot? That’s never happened since 1999. It’s unprecedented in the modern era. Pray for Bobby. He’s facing pressures most can’t imagine. Does the world even realize what he’s standing against?

Dr Sherri Tenpenny

90,499 次观看 • 1 年前