正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨BREAKING: In Chicago, ICE/Border Patrol agents racially profiled construction workers, jumped over a locked fence without a warrant, and refused to leave after the owner repeatedly told them to… all while causing approximately $30,000 in damage. And now, the homeowner is suing. According to a new federal lawsuit and...

53,377 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents illegally smashed through the glass door of a locked auto body shop, without a warrant, to detain the shop owner and an employee, in West Valley City, Utah. Yes, agents are violating the Constitution all over the country, not just in Minnesota. In the video, two agents are already standing inside the body shop when the owner’s wife asks them the most basic, constitutionally required question, “Do you have a warrant?” …after they broke in. They illegally ignore her request and instead tell HER to stay back. She continues demanding to see a warrant. And then they say the quiet part out loud: “We don’t need one.” They absolutely do, which is exactly what she tells them. They continue ignoring her, after illegally breaking into a locked, private business, while ordering her to back up inside her own workplace. The agents then begin questioning the shop owner and an employee, despite not knowing their status, and having zero probable cause. She tells them, “My lawyer is coming, do you want to get sued?” And the agents laugh. Sit with that. Border Patrol agents force entry into a private business, without a warrant, and laugh about accountability. The agents admit on camera that they broke the glass door to enter the private property. She says that’s why you had to break in… “Because you don’t have a warrant!” And the agent says again: “It’s because we don’t need one.” They detain the shop owner and an employee anyway, after breaking in, without a warrant… despite both men having no criminal records. This is a blatant Fourth Amendment violation. A locked business is private property… where a warrant is not optional. If this is tolerated, it sets the precedent that federal agents can smash their way into ANY business, detain whoever they want, and disappear them. That is not law enforcement. That is an open assault on constitutional rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,216,712 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally entered private property without a warrant, were explicitly told to leave, and… while being filmed… assaulted a U.S. citizen, violently arrested him, and then released him eight hours later without charges in Lakeville, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents are already on private property when the man begins filming. He tells one agent to get out of his face. Instead of leaving, the agent assaults him by striking his phone, attempting to stop the recording. The agent then claims, “You have the camera in my face, get it out of my face,” and hits the phone again… despite the fact that the agents approached him, not the other way around, and he was lawfully recording on private property. The situation escalates when agents throw the man to the ground, shouting, “You want to get in my fucking face?” They proceed to physically assault and illegally arrest him, even though they had no warrant, no probable cause, and no legal right to be on the property in the first place. After holding him for eight hours, ICE quietly releases him… underscoring what the video already shows: this arrest was never lawful to begin with. This isn’t law enforcement. It’s intimidation, retaliation for filming, and a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. If federal agents can trespass, assault, and arrest U.S. citizens with no warrant… and face no immediate consequences… then the question isn’t whether this will happen again. It’s how many more Americans will be assaulted before constitutional rights mean something again.

Jesus Freakin Congress

726,718 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨BREAKING: In Columbia Heights, MN, ICE agents are going door to door and targeting people based on how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, then human trafficking them when they refuse to comply with unlawful orders. In the video, a man is standing by a garage on private property. ICE agents approach him and demand identification. The man correctly states that he does not have to show ID. He is not suspected of a crime, he is on private property, and the agents have no warrant… He then asks why he is required to provide documentation. An agent then says the quiet part out loud… “Because of your accent.” The man points out the obvious, “You have an accent too.” The agent then asks, “Where were you born?” The man responds, “Where were you born?” At that point, the agent escalates. He orders, “Put your hands behind your back,” then physically grabs the man, shoves him against the garage, and restrains him without a warrant, without probable cause, and without reasonable suspicion of a crime, or even knowing who he is. Another agent steps directly in front of the camera to obstruct recording, while another joins in assaulting the man on private property. What’s illegal here is visible on video: • Detaining someone on private property without a warrant • Demanding identification without reasonable suspicion • Targeting someone based solely on accent or perceived national origin • Using force to enforce an unlawful order • Obstructing a lawful recording of law enforcement The man is then taken against his will so ICE can “prove his status.” That is not a lawful stop, it is human trafficking under color of law, seizing a person first and transporting them elsewhere to investigate their identity later, all for profit. This is not border enforcement. This is not public safety. This is government agents abducting people based on how they sound, then trafficking them through detention systems for funding, quotas, and “processing.” And the question isn’t whether this man had legal status. The question is how long Americans will tolerate federal agents kidnapping people on private property, calling it “verification,” and pretending the Constitution no longer applies.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,414,450 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: (CHICAGO SUBURBS) ICE agents pulled a GUN, and a TASER, on unarmed U.S. citizens for recording them from a public sidewalk… while threatening, “you aren’t going to like the outcome.” In the video, legal observers are standing on a public sidewalk recording ICE agents. The agents stop, get out of their cars, and approach THEM. One agent has his GUN drawn, another has his TASER drawn. The agents tell the legal observers to stop following them. A U.S. citizen responds: “We aren’t doing anything illegal. It’s totally legal to follow you.” He is correct. The First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement, and federal agents, carrying out their duties in public. And federal regulations specifically recognize that people can record publicly accessible federal activity from public sidewalks, and streets, when they aren’t impeding or disrupting operations. Then, the agent says: “Stop following us, you aren’t going to like the outcome.” That is a serious First Amendment retaliation issue. And then it gets even more dangerous. The same armed federal agents, who just threatened these people with weapons and retaliation… surround the citizens’ car and claim THEY are blocking traffic. But look at the video. The only people blocking traffic are the ICE agents… who have now boxed in the citizens’ car. Agents cannot detain someone because they don’t like being watched. A vehicle stop requires reasonable suspicion of an actual legal violation. And recording and observing ICE agents, from a public place, is not obstruction. It is not illegal. Government agents are supposed to be accountable to the people… not the other way around. The First Amendment protects your right to watch and record your government. The Fourth Amendment limits the government’s power to stop and detain you. And neither one comes with an ICE exception.

Jesus Freakin Congress

125,050 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨BREAKING: Male ICE/Border Patrol agents used physical force to unlawfully detain a woman project manager on a private job site after she questioned their authority and refused to hand over ID. In Amherst, NY, the woman is the project manager for a roofing company and was standing on the private property of an active job when agents entered the yard without a warrant. As she asked basic, lawful questions… including whether they had a warrant… and began filming, agents demanded her identification. She refused, which she is legally allowed to do in New York. That refusal triggered an immediate escalation. A male agent ordered her to put her hands against a tree, pushed her into it, and began grabbing at her body and reaching toward her pockets while attempting to restrain her. As this happened, she repeatedly asks, “What are you arresting me for?” The agents never answer. They continue using physical force without stating a charge, legal basis, or probable cause. Refusing to provide ID is not a crime in New York. Filming federal agents is not a crime. Asking whether officers have a warrant is not a crime. What is unlawful is entering private property without a judicial warrant, physically restraining someone without probable cause, attempting to search their person, and detaining them while refusing to state a reason. This was not enforcement. It was retaliation. And when masked male federal agents feel empowered to shove a woman into a tree and put their hands on her for asserting her rights on her own job site, it exposes just how far beyond the law they believe they are operating.

Jesus Freakin Congress

195,575 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents in New York illegally surrounded two cars and demanded the people inside prove their citizenship. Community members showed up and immediately started asking the questions ICE never wants asked on camera: “Do you have a warrant?” The agents claimed they did. But when people asked to actually SEE the warrant… they refused. Because they didn’t have one. That’s the constitutional violation right there. In the United States, federal agents cannot legally detain people, block their vehicles in, and demand proof of citizenship without lawful justification. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. You don’t lose those rights because ICE decides to profile you. And unless agents have a judicial warrant signed by a judge, or actual legal probable cause tied to a crime, they cannot just trap people in their cars fishing for immigration status. ICE keeps counting on intimidation instead of law. They surround cars with multiple agents, act aggressive, throw around words like “warrant,” and hope people are too scared to question them. But the second community members demanded proof, the whole thing fell apart. Both cars were eventually released… because ICE never had the legal right to stop them in the first place. This is exactly why people recording matters. This is exactly why communities showing up matters. And this is exactly why constitutional rights matter… especially when federal agents are acting like they don’t apply to them anymore.

Jesus Freakin Congress

103,307 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were filmed trespassing in a fenced-in yard, with their gun drawn, without a warrant, in Joliet, Illinois. In the video, a person inside the house starts recording after noticing ICE agents were walking around their property. One agent can be seen with their hand on their gun. Then, a second agent walks into view with their gun fully drawn… and briefly points it toward the person filming inside the house, before moving out of frame as the person filming yells, “what are you doing?” A fenced-in yard is not public property. Under the 4th Amendment, the area immediately surrounding a home, including fenced yards, is considered part of the home itself for constitutional protections. Courts call this the “curtilage” of the home. Which means federal agents are not supposed to just roam around inside it without a warrant, consent, or an actual emergency circumstance that legally justifies it. Then there’s the gun… Because this wasn’t someone charging at officers. This was a person INSIDE their own home… holding a phone… recording what armed federal agents were doing on their property. So, what exactly justified drawing a firearm and briefly aiming it toward the person filming? What immediate threat existed? This is the kind of behavior that should terrify people regardless of politics… because once armed federal agents start treating constitutional protections like suggestions, no one is safe. Rights either apply to everyone… or eventually they stop meaning anything at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

274,463 次观看 • 2 个月前