Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

#BREAKING ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐—จ.๐—ฆ. ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐—–๐—›๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ฆ๐— ๐—œ๐—ง๐—›: โ€œ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ ๐—–๐—”๐—กโ€™๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐— ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฏ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ข๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—šโ€ In a candid, short, quick interview with journalist Hariana Verรกs ( Hariana Veras ), U.S. Congressman Chris Smith made strong remarks about the ongoing conflict in eastern Congo, calling out Rwandaโ€™s role and...

14,584 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

๐ŸšจM23 WILL NOT INTEGRATE INTO DRC ARMY. โ€”Rwanda and M23 will lay down their weapons. Aggressors against the Washington Accords are on notice. ๐ŸšฉM23 is on notice. ๐ŸšฉRwanda, Kagame is on notice. There will be peace in the DRC. Now is the time for peace. โ€”M23, lay down your weapons and go home. โ€”RDF, soldiers return home. What is being supported and encouraged from the seat of authority in Kigali is not sustainable. It will not last. Peace loving Congolese, peace loving Rwandese, now is the time for peace. Reject the war mongering, the violence and aggression that has tortured eastern DRC. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉDRC will have peace. Peace, prosperity, and Godโ€™s grace on the Great Lakes Region. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธRepublican US Representative Chris Smith, Senior Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee laid it out well today: โ€”Sanctions are on the table. Theyโ€™re coming. Buckle up. Watch all 78 seconds of this riveting interview by Hariana Veras ! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธWould you lean in and pray now for the courageous and common sense voices who are demanding an end to the looting of minerals, the violence on the people, the killing, and the destruction of beautiful people in eastern DR Congo? #RDC National Faith Advisory Board Prรฉsidence RDC ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ President Donald J. Trump The White House

Pastor Travis Johnson

91,337 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce

U.S. State Department responds to Russia and Iranโ€™s statements against the โ€˜Trump Corridorโ€™ โ€“ Ahmad Shahidovโ€™s question becomes highlight of the briefing Today, the U.S. State Department held its regular press briefing in Washington DC. Spokesperson Tammy Bruce answered questions from both domestic and international journalists on current issues. Ahmad Shahidov, a Washington-based journalist and human rights defender, expressed his gratitude to the U.S. President for his contributions to global peace and particularly praised the U.S. role in achieving peace in the South Caucasus. Referring to the historic peace agreement signed on August 8 at the White House between Azerbaijan and Armenia under U.S. mediation, Shahidov recalled Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyevโ€™s suggestion that President Donald Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for this achievement. Ahmad Shahidov asked for the State Departmentโ€™s assessment of the new peace environment in the South Caucasus and inquired about the U.S. position in light of threats from Russia and Iran, including statements from Tehran declaring they would prevent the โ€˜Trump Corridor.โ€™ In her response, Tammy Bruce said she would not speculate on possible steps, but stressed that the world takes President Donald Trump very seriously: โ€œThis agreement is very important to the U.S. President. The leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia were at the White House. This peace matters to Washington and to the world. Azerbaijan and Armenia have been in conflict for decades โ€” over 35 years โ€” with countless lives lost. The Europeans, the French, Putin, and even Biden have all tried, but only President Donald Trump was able to bring these two countries to sign a historic peace agreement. The world knows that President Trump is committed to long-term peace and, when necessary, will use the powers of the U.S. Presidency to protect it.โ€

Dr. Ahmad Shahidov

201,959 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 11 ay รถnce

Like all Africans and beyond, I am deeply saddened by the situation in the Eastern Congo. I want to pass my condolences to South Africa on the death of its soldiers who have died in pursuit of peace in the DRC, and everyone who has been killed by this crisis. Today I took time to understand the issues and the root cause of the Great Lakes crisis, you canโ€™t understand it all in a day. I am not an expert on the Great Lakes, but I found two insightful videos featuring Tanzaniaโ€™s founding father, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, and former South African President Thabo Mbeki explaining it. Both leaders were actively involved in efforts to address the Great Lakes issue, with Nyerere engaging as far back as 1992 and earlier. The problem can be traced back to 1885 during the Berlin Conference, where Africa was partitioned among European colonial powers and borders were drawn regardless of ethnic sensitivities. Belgium, the colonial power in the DRC, and Germany, the colonial power in Rwanda, drew borders that divided the Rwandan Kingdom, incorporating parts of it into what is now the DRC. As a result of this partitioning, the Banyarwanda (including the Banyamulenge) ended up living on both sides of the borderโ€”in Rwanda and the DRC. Just like the Tswanas in South Africa and Botswana. Despite being Zairean (Congolese) citizens, the Banyarwanda in the DRC were often treated as foreigners by successive Congolese governments, and they faced significant discrimination. The situation worsened after the Tutsi genocide in Rwanda in 1994 which was carried out by the Hutus, when perpetrators of the genocide fled into the DRC, particularly to areas where Congolese Banyarwanda lived. These perpetrators formed a militia called the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). The FDLR, which opposes the current Rwandan government, was later incorporated into the Congolese army, causing Rwanda to view their presence in Eastern Congo as a significant security threat. Rwanda objected to the persecution of the Congolese Banyarwanda by the Congolese Government and the FDLR in the DRC. Rwandaโ€™s said its involvement in the DRC is rooted in its efforts to neutralise the FDLR and protect its national security, as well as to address the marginalisation of the Banyarwanda in Eastern Congo. However, this involvement has also sparked significant controversy and accusations of resource exploitation and destabilisation by the DRC. The M23 (March 23 Movement) originated from the National Congress for the Defence of the People (CNDP), a Tutsi-led rebel group in the DRC that operated in the mid-2000s. The CNDP was mainly focused on protecting the rights of Congolese Tutsis (Banyarwanda) who faced discrimination and violence, particularly after the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. Reports by Human Rights Watch in October 2022 revealed that the Congolese military supported the FDLR in their military operations against the M23 rebel group. At the same time, the Congolese government has accused Rwanda of supporting the M23 militarily. Currently the conflict involves the M23 and the Congolese army, with the DRC accusing Rwanda of deploying its troops on Congolese soil. As Nyerere points out in the video, the Zairean government stripped the Banyarwanda in the Congo of their citizenship, rendering them stateless. However, they are Congolese due to the colonial borders. What is clear is that this crisis is not an overnight problem, it has been there for decades, long before both Presidents Paul Kagame and Fรฉlix Tshisekedi were in power. What is lacking is leadership from the region and the continent to help both countries resolve this crisis once and for all. It is like a volcano that has been erupting periodically, the crisis is crying out for a modern day Nyerere or Mbeki. It is now unrealistic to expect Presidents Kagame and Tshisekedi to invite each other for coffee, it needs someone with gravitas to invite them. This crisis has no military solution except dialogue.

Hopewell Chinโ€™ono

220,146 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

HOW THE WEST ENABLES RWANDA TO LOOT CONGO Kayumba Nyamwasa, former Rwanda Army chief of staff and head of Rwandan intelligence from 1998 to 2002, dropped a bombshell on 2 February when he told @newzroomafrikaโ€™s Aldrin Sampear that Western countries like France, the United Kingdom and the United States do not comment on Rwandaโ€™s military operations in neighbouring countries like Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Mozambique because Rwandan companies process smuggled minerals that benefit said Western powers. The recent escalation in violence as the Rwanda- and Uganda-backed M23 militia seized mineral-rich lands in eastern DRC on its way to entering Goma city has renewed the conversation about Rwandaโ€™s and Ugandaโ€™s roles in the foreign-instigated three-decade-long conflict over resources. How the West has ignored Rwandaโ€™s activities contrasts sharply with sanctions imposed against Rwanda and aid cuts in 2012 that forced M23 to go underground. As early as 1998, Burundian, Rwandan, Ugandan and/or Rally for Congolese Democracy (RCD) soldiers emptied DRC warehouses. The looting remains a prominent feature across successive proxy campaigns, casting doubt on claims that Rwanda or M23 intervenes in the DRC only in the interests of marginalised Tutsis in the DRC. Since M23โ€™s resurgence in 2021, reportedly due to Rwanda fearing isolation following increased DRC-Uganda cooperation, the militia has displaced hundreds of thousands of people in eastern DRC. Reports indicate M23 is closing in around the city of Bukavu after entering Goma on 27 January. In Rubaya, which M23 captured in 2024, the group has generated around $300,000 monthly in taxes from tantalum mining. Video credit: @newzroomafrika (X)

African Stream

25,582 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

#TRANSCRIBED The U.S. warned that it is going to use โ€œtools at its disposalโ€ to hold Rwanda accountable, a "spoilers to peaceโ€, referring to both Rwanda and M23. READ THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF THE UNITED STATES' DURING TODAY'S UN SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING The United States is profoundly concerned and deeply disappointed by the renewed outbreak of violence in Eastern DRC. Today, I want to share additional information on the scale and sophistication of Rwandaโ€™s involvement in the region. Since its re-emergence in 2021, Rwanda has maintained strategic control over its proxy armed group, M23, as well as M23โ€™s political wing, the Congo River Alliance, also known as the AFC. Rwanda has deployed M23 and the AFC to further its geopolitical ambitions in Eastern DRC. Kigali has been directly involved in planning and executing the war, providing both military and political direction to M23 and the AFC. For years, the Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF) have supplied material, logistical, and training support to M23, and have fought alongside them in the DRC with approximately 5,000 to 7,000 troops as of early December โ€” not accounting for any additional deployments during the recent escalation. In recent months, Rwanda has deployed multiple surface-to-air missile systems and other heavy, sophisticated weaponry into North and South Kivu to support M23 in its ongoing conflict with the DRC. Just this past weekend, M23 and Rwandan forces launched an offensive to seize Uvira, with RDF forces co-located on the frontlines with M23 fighters. We also have credible reports of increased use of suicide drones and artillery by both M23 and Rwanda, including artillery strikes into Burundi. Rather than a march toward peace โ€” as seen in recent weeks under the leadership of President Trump through the Washington Accords โ€” Rwanda is instead dragging the region back into greater instability and war. In light of the commitments made in Washington, we are deeply concerned about the continued presence of Rwandan military forces on Congolese soil in support of M23. The United States will use every tool at our disposal to hold accountable the spoilers of peace. We call on Rwanda to uphold its commitments and to fully recognize the Democratic Republic of Congoโ€™s sovereign right to defend its territory, including the right to invite Burundian forces onto its land in response to aggression. We are engaging with all parties to urge restraint and to prevent further escalation โ€” including calling for an end to hostile and ethnically charged anti-Tutsi rhetoric. As this Council continues to negotiate the renewal of the MONUSCO mandate, the United States will seek to ensure that the mission is empowered to support both the Doha and Washington agreements. While the parties themselves bear full responsibility for implementing these agreements, MONUSCO must have the freedom and capability to operate โ€” including unimpeded mobility and logistical support. It is a sad hypocrisy that UN peacekeepers are under siege from forces backed by a UN member state โ€” a state which also contributes troops to peacekeeping missions. The months-long M23 blockade on MONUSCO has severely impaired its ability to operate in and around Goma, as many have highlighted today. Furthermore, Rwanda continues to deploy surface-to-air missiles and conducts spoofing and jamming operations, effectively grounding MONUSCOโ€™s air assets. Under such conditions, how can MONUSCO succeed? We demand the immediate cessation of these obstructions, which violate Rwandaโ€™s and M23โ€™s obligations under the Doha and Washington Agreements. The United States remains firm in its support for MONUSCO and its critical role in realizing these historic agreements, which we believe hold the potential to finally end decades of suffering in Eastern DRC.

Xtrafrica

43,911 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 7 ay รถnce

DRC ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ On the Crisis in Eastern DRC: Narratives, Blind Spots, and the Real Road to Peace (My interpretation of President Kagameโ€™s recent remarks โ€ฆ on my question) There is a real concern today that some actors in Europe are trying to shape or interfere with peace efforts currently led by the United States and Qatar, efforts that aim to finally bring an end to the three-decade-long crisis affecting both the DRC and Rwanda. During his press conference, President Kagame pointed out something fundamental: Africaโ€™s narratives, including the narratives about current crises, are still largely produced in Europe. Today, the focus from Europe is placed heavily on the humanitarian crisis, which undeniably exists. But focusing only on its visible symptoms, while ignoring the root causes, cannot produce a meaningful resolution. - A Missing Part of the Narrative For decades, Europe has largely overlooked the presence and activities of armed groups operating near Rwandaโ€™s border, especially the FDLR, a group whose origins and ideology still shape instability in the region. While some European voices now try to minimize this threat by calling the FDLR โ€œold,โ€ the reality is more complex: โ€ขTheir leadership may be aging, but their fighters are not. โ€ขThey continue to recruit within Congolese Banyarwanda communities. โ€ขTheir presence and ideology have contributed to mass displacement, including over 100,000 Congolese Banyarwanda who have lived in exile for nearly 30 years. These unresolved issues are directly connected to the emergence of multiple armed movements over the years, with M23 being the latest manifestation of that long-standing cycle. - State Complicity and Security Concerns Another point often ignored in European narratives is that elements of the FDLR have reportedly been integrated into the Congolese national army, deepening Rwandaโ€™s security concerns and reinforcing the sense of exclusion among Congolese Banyarwanda who are still denied the right to return home. These dynamics are rarely acknowledged in Europe, where the dominant narrative reduces the crisis to the โ€œminerals lootingโ€ storyline. - The Minerals Narrative โ€“ and What It Leaves Out President Kagame also reminded the audience that: โ€ขLong before M23 resurfaced, minerals from Eastern DRC were already being exploited and smuggled out, often under the control of armed groups , including the FDLR. โ€ขNetworks facilitating this illicit trade exist even in Europe. โ€ขYet the EU has been largely silent about this aspect, focusing instead on narratives that shift blame elsewhere. Ignoring these factors: โ€ขOversimplifies the crisis, โ€ขAvoids confronting governance issues within the DRC, โ€ขMinimizes the threat posed by armed groups, and โ€ขErases the long-standing displacement and rights of Congolese Banyarwanda. - Why This Matters When Europe pushes a narrative that doesnโ€™t reflect the full picture, it risks undermining peace processes that do seek to address the foundations of the conflict. A durable solution requires recognizing all drivers of insecurity, not just the ones that fit external political comfort zones.

Albert Rudatsimburwa ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ

14,541 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

It is a shame and an embarrassment that Rwanda is represented in America by a woman who has no shame about lying in public like Mathilde Mukantabana 1๏ธโƒฃLinking the sanctions that America imposed on the Rwanda Ministry of Defence to the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda is so disgusting. Stop using the families of innocent victims in the atrocities you commit. We all know that those sanctions stem from Kagame using the #RDF to steal mineral resources through the wars he constantly sparks in the eastern Congo by invading their border. 2๏ธโƒฃSaying that Rwanda is blamed for #M23's killings and playing the victim by claiming you are being treated unfairly contradicts the document you wrote yourself, which states that Rwanda collaborates with, works with, and supports #M23. 3๏ธโƒฃSaying that there are Americans who are your friends supporting you and that you are discussing lifting the sanctions is nonsense. Sanctions were enacted through executive authorities and cannot be canceled by individuals or private entities. Please stop, we are not stupid to be fooled by that . Paul Kagameโ€™s regime problem and their supporters is that because you know they intimidated Rwandans,where anyone who speaks out is killed, they mistakenly think everyone must listen to them and stay silent. Hell no. #Kagame repeatedly told sanction makers to "go to hell" during the Prayer Breakfast and Kwibuka 31. Now heโ€™s begging them. If he wants relief, why doesn't he just pull Rwandan troops out of the DRC as the Washington Accord demands instead of this dramaโ“ #MillenZMovementRwโœŠ

U.Sheila C kamuzinzi ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ

16,134 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 ay รถnce

Trumpโ€™s Profit (Pฬตeฬตaฬตcฬตeฬต) Deal With DRC and Rwanda Trump has got another one of those phantom war resolution tales to add to his collection. A deal to end the protracted conflict between the Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC and Rwanda, which Trump reached with both countriesโ€™ leaders earlier in December has been added to the long list of wars the U.S. under his administration has ended on paper. The fighting sides could barely wait seven days after Trumpโ€™s boastful peace declaration to resume hostilities, with civilian deaths being recorded in a not fewer magnitude than pre peace deal. With all the usual foes participating in the renewed violence, it was a clear indicator that the root of the conflict had been either left untouched or deliberately preserved. This raises questions regarding the true objective of the Washington accord; was it a peace or profit deal? Considering Trumpโ€™s blunt remarks ahead of the deal such as โ€œwe are going to get a lot of minerals from this deal,โ€ calling it the latter doesnโ€™t place anyone nearer to the truth. The Empireโ€™s modus operandi checks out with the involvement of the defunct USAID as long as the history of the conflict, reinforcing the belief that those who sponsored and sustained the war have come once again posing as superheroes. Under the guise of the United States world peace outreach, profiting off the $24 trillion DRC mineral wealth at the expense of more than 109 millions of its people has been rebranded as a โ€œhistoricโ€ peace deal. Biggest Mack reports.

The Spearhead

14,285 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce

Dar es Salaam 08.02.2025 My Welcome and Opening remarks at the Joint Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the East African Community (EAC) Heads of State and Government Summit on the prevailing security situation in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). As regional leaders, history will judge us harshly if we remain still and watch the situation worsen day by day. In line with the principle of African solutions for Africaโ€™s problems, our countries have a collective responsibility to ensure we urgently address the existing security challenges that have heavily impacted the well-being of innocent civilians. This joint summit meeting in Dar es Salaam presents an opportunity to recommit our collective efforts in addressing the conflicts, and reaffirm our sustainable peace and stability in the entire EAC and SADC regions. It is crucial that we find a durable solution that upholds sovereignty, promotes inclusivity and ensures that the people of DRC can enjoy the durable peace and security that they have been yearning for, for decades. As a steadfast advocate for peace in Africa, Tanzania is deeply concerned about the persistent insecurity in Eastern DRC. The ongoing conflict not only destabilizes our brotherly nation, but also puts serious dents on our consistent efforts to enhance regional integration. My country remains committed to supporting ongoing diplomatic initiatives to end this conflict, and so we call on all parties involved to positively engage in negotiations, prioritize the well-being of the people, and commit to a peaceful co-existence.

Samia Suluhu

162,853 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

#ARCHIVE ๐——๐—ฅ๐—– ๐—™๐—  ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—š๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ In an interview with Sky News, Foreign Minister Thรฉrรจse Kayikwamba Wagner urged the United Kingdom and international community to impose firm, targeted sanctions against Rwandaโ€™s leadership, warning that continued inaction risks legitimising war crimes and economic looting. โ€œWe need sanctions, firm sanctions, and nd when we speak of sanctions, we do not speak of sanctions that target the Rwandan population, but sanctions that actually target the Rwandan leadership, the chain of command, and the financial networks behind this aggression.โ€ Accountability Must Follow the Chain of Command Minister Wagner outlined the legal basis for international accountability, referencing well-documented UN findings linking the Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF) directly to the M23 rebel group operating in eastern DRC. โ€œThere is clear evidence connecting the Rwandan army to M23, and from M23 directly back to decision-makers in Kigali. There must be accountability along that chain of command. There is legal precedent for that, in the DRC and elsewhere.โ€ According to Wagner, such accountability is not just moral, but necessary for deterrence: โ€œIf impunity continues, then violence becomes a strategy, not a crime.โ€ โ€œRwanda Has No Mines, Only Congoโ€™s Mineralsโ€ The Minister then turned to the economic enablers of war, calling for an international ban on the export of Rwandan minerals. โ€œRwanda presents itself as a mineral exporter. Yet, there are no significant mines in Rwanda. None. These minerals come from the DRC, extracted in zones under occupation, through violence and exploitation.โ€ She demanded that global markets enforce traceability laws to prevent the sale of โ€œblood mineralsโ€ disguised as Rwandan exports. โ€œThere is precedent for banning conflict minerals from reaching the world market. The same must now apply to Rwanda.โ€ โ€œRwanda Killed Peacekeepers, and Still Wears the UN Badgeโ€ Wagner exposed another contradiction that has stunned African observers and international diplomats alike: Rwandaโ€™s status as one of the largest troop.

XTRAfrica Media Group

15,477 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

#EXPLAINED ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—š๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ, "๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—œ๐˜? ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐— ๐˜† ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜." In a revealing and almost unguarded speech, Rwandan President Paul Kagame has essentially admitted what Kinshasa and the international community have long accused him of: holding Goma and eastern Congo hostage to force political concessions from the DRC. During the press Conference today in Kigali, Nov 27 Kagame, speaking in reference to Goma, said: โ€œIf I were the one controlling Gomaโ€ฆ and you come and say, โ€˜I want to use Goma,โ€™ I say fine, but these are conditions. Goma is part of my problems with the government, and now it is in my hands. I will not give it to you until you show me how you address my problems.โ€ While Kagame frames this as a hypothetical, the choice of words, โ€œit is in my hands,โ€ strips away the fiction. This is no longer about M23 rebels acting independently. This is Kagame speaking as the occupier. He goes further: โ€œYou want Goma, Kavumu, Bukavu, or even the whole of eastern Congo back? Fine. But you must address my problems first.โ€ This is not diplomacy, itโ€™s blackmail through armed occupation. It confirms what Congo has said for years: Kagame uses M23 and direct Rwandan troop deployments to control Congolese territory, not for security, but as leverage to extract political and economic concessions. What this proves: Kagame is admitting territorial control of Goma, a city that has been under de facto M23 occupation since early 2025. He links the return of Congolese territory to Rwandaโ€™s grievances, meaning he considers eastern Congo a bargaining chip. He uses personal pronouns ("my hands", "I will not give it"), revealing direct ownership of the occupation. He reinforces a long pattern: Kagame sees military force as a legitimate tool to resolve political issues. "If you don't give me my rights, then it means they fight. We will fight, no question about it." Paul Kagame, Nov. 2025 What This Means for Congo This speech justifies every single accusation Kinshasa, Muyaya, and Kayikwamba have made: Rwanda is not acting in self-defense; it is occupying Congo militarily. Goma is not under rebel control; it is under Rwandan strategic control. Kagame has no intention of withdrawing unless he gets political rewards, which is blackmail, not peace. No Peace Under Hostage Conditions Tshisekedi is going to Washington not to beg for peace, but to expose Rwanda's regional aggression. Kagameโ€™s own words reveal that he holds Congolese territory to pressure Kinshasa, and is willing to keep fighting if his โ€œproblemsโ€ arenโ€™t resolved. But letโ€™s be clear What are Kagameโ€™s โ€œproblemsโ€? He wants free access to Congoโ€™s minerals, the ability to launder them through Rwandan markets, and he dreams of infiltrating, once again the Congolese army (FARDC) to maintain long-term control. But This time, the Congolese government will not let it happen again. La patrie ou La mort

XTRAfrica Media Group

16,945 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce