Can Christians Believe In Evolution?

Most dishonest Creationist I've seen in a while.

What is dishonest?

Starting with your blatant misrepresentation of Evolution. Organisms evolving interdependence doesn't necessarily make them "Weaker". You'd know this if you spent half the time used to edit that video trying to learn about evolution Nothing worse than a lying Christian @grok

@taco_talks @grok Micro evolution is just adaptation, no change of “kinds” or species. Theres never been any evidence of macro evolution.

@taco_talks @grok Definition and observed examples of Macroevolution (Speciation). @grok

@A_Western91 @taco_talks @grok Ok.

*Le sigh* The Hebrew Yom and the Greek Hemera also refer to period of time or age. Such as "In the day of the Lord." Seeing how the sun didn't exist until day 4? The word day here does not mean 24 hour period of time. "Light" is also consistently used to mean knowledge, truth, and the act of creation. Genesis here is using day to refer to age, Exodus is using light to refer to creation and darkness to the cessation of creation. Why would it mean 24 hour period of time when there is no sun for reference?

“Taco-talks” and it’s literally just him talking to himself and a made up version of his opponents which don’t actually exist. At least the name is accurate ig.

100%. I see no reason not to

Then watch the video 😂

I already did. Your evidence isn’t definitive. It’s interpretive. The Bible does not say “evolution is false.” Young Earth creationists do. Science already explains evolution through a robust, evidence-based theory. The Church already allows us to believe in it…so? I will and do

The video over all is either dishonest or clueless about many things, an example of a really simple mistake: Neanderthal skulls have ton of differences compared with human skulls apart from the brows, and the claim that the brown never stops growing isn’t precisely correct

You can’t observe evolution. There’s zero way to prove that a single celled organism can spontaneously begin to replicate itself into a multicellular organism. Furthermore, there is zero evidence that a fish was able to evolve into mammals. The genomes of the species are set. And no new genetic material has emerged ever. In fact hybrid animals are genetically defective and can’t reproduce. It takes so much more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in creation.

No, Neanderthals did not just have bigger brows. The whole brain case was lower and longer, resting behind the brow rather than on top of it, and featuring an occipital bun. Their whole face protruded forward more. The postcranial skeleton was also more robust with shorter limbs.

Going from asexual reproduction to sexual reproduction is not de-evolving. Evolution is the theory things change over time to prolong their existence. Something that reproduces asexually only makes clones and cannot change without mutations (a fig is a good example)

Evolution is a religion that is at odds with the Bible. Why would a Christian want to believe in a competing religion?

You are absolutely clueless about the Hebrew scriptures. There are multiple creation myths, creator deities, and competing views of mankind’s origins.

Obviously. They can always just say god did it, because they don’t have to prove their god exists that doesn’t exist.

Interesting… so I just applied these hermeneutics to John 6 and um… turns out you agree that the Eucharist is the real presence of Christ! Trippy. Thanks for clearing that up tugboat.

💯

It's simple if there was evolution why did it stop? How many sludge ponds have there been when a new animal should be popping out we should be seeing them everywhere every other week.

Its arguments like this that cause me to thank God for the book of Abraham

Someone who only understand the science at a surface level talking about it as if they fully understand every nuance at a macro level. I think there’s a term for this. Oh that’s right! The Dunning Kruger Effect.

A god day is worth trillions of earth days. Einstein 3rd relativity equation: as dimensionality increases, time compresses

But why does this thing happen.... bible Yes but scientists....Er, you're forgetting bible Are you sure, I've seen scientists present evidence... BIBLE!!!!!

This is a really shitty reading of genesis

Fun fact: Catholics are the original Creationists. The Doctrine has never changed, despite what you might have heard from low-information Catholics :

Amen 🙏 💯

Darwin explicitly stated in “the descent of man” that he doesnt believe different races were seperate species and that the differences between humans were superficial and derived from from adaptation and variation. He never once placed a living group of people between man and ape

lol. The word-gymnastics religious folk have to spew in order to try to explain the Bible is crazy.

The theory of evolution is slowly being abandoned by the scientific community for over a decade now.

@Curi_Christian

Could you explain the second centromere on chromosome 2 or the connected telomeres in the middle?

The delusion is delicious. What an idiot.

For a second I thought you were explaining why the Bible shouldn’t be taken literally instead of stories by God to teach morals then I realized you were stupid

I’ve been alive a long time and I haven’t seen any animals evolve

mental jewish gymnastics

Using the same interpretive method, you should affirm that there is a tangible firmament, with water above it, the luminaries (sun, moon, stars) within it, and earth below it. This appears in Genesis 1 with the separation of the waters, and later in flood narrative where God “opens the windows of the firmament” in a de-creation act. Most modern creationists read “firmament” in three different ways in Genesis 1, and throughout the rest of the bible. They force modern science onto the text to explain away this very clear observation from Genesis and across the Hebrew Bible

There you go making sense again…

And this is total BS.