Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"CANADA HAS NO PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH" David Rosenberg says Canada's unit labour costs are rising around 8% annually, versus near 0% in the U.S. His warning: If nothing changes, the Canadian dollar may not stop at 1.50 USD/CAD... it could eventually head toward 1.60+. This is why productivity matters.

Shazi

40,179 subscribers

89,015 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Is Your Portfolio Prepared for a Productivity Boom? I joined our friend Maria Bartiromo on FOX Business today to explain why a structural uptrend in U.S. productivity is becoming the dominant macro force for markets. The US economy is likely transitioning from a trend 2% productivity regime toward a trend 3% productivity regime—a shift that historically has coincided with materially stronger equity returns and significantly faster corporate profit growth. I emphasized that if this productivity dynamic proves durable, debates surrounding the backward-looking Powell Fed and near-term inflation concerns will matter far less than the earnings power being generated by increased efficiency. Investors who wish to retire on time and comfortably must have exposure to productivity growth in their portfolios—which is why 42 Macro 🇺🇸's flagship KISS Model Portfolio continues to be max long of stocks at 60%. Gold has remained a core allocation in our systematic KISS strategy as well after we replaced the 30% allocation to bonds with bullion in Oct-24.

Is Your Portfolio Prepared for a Productivity Boom? I joined our friend Maria Bartiromo on FOX Business today to explain why a structural uptrend in U.S. productivity is becoming the dominant macro force for markets. The US economy is likely transitioning from a trend 2% productivity regime toward a trend 3% productivity regime—a shift that historically has coincided with materially stronger equity returns and significantly faster corporate profit growth. I emphasized that if this productivity dynamic proves durable, debates surrounding the backward-looking Powell Fed and near-term inflation concerns will matter far less than the earnings power being generated by increased efficiency. Investors who wish to retire on time and comfortably must have exposure to productivity growth in their portfolios—which is why 42 Macro 🇺🇸's flagship KISS Model Portfolio continues to be max long of stocks at 60%. Gold has remained a core allocation in our systematic KISS strategy as well after we replaced the 30% allocation to bonds with bullion in Oct-24.

Darius Dale

15,527 views • 6 months ago

Polished speech, but it dodged reality. No mention of a trillion dollars in pensions tied to the U.S. Tax cuts worked out to less than a dollar a day while fees and the carbon tax climbed. Jobs are flat, productivity near the bottom of the OECD, and living costs are crushing households. Mass migration strained housing and healthcare. No pipelines, no industrial growth, stagnant wages. Fine for Davos but it's not delivering anything to Canadians.

Polished speech, but it dodged reality. No mention of a trillion dollars in pensions tied to the U.S. Tax cuts worked out to less than a dollar a day while fees and the carbon tax climbed. Jobs are flat, productivity near the bottom of the OECD, and living costs are crushing households. Mass migration strained housing and healthcare. No pipelines, no industrial growth, stagnant wages. Fine for Davos but it's not delivering anything to Canadians.

Shane Wenzel

53,590 views • 6 months ago

Had so much fun chatting with Greg Kaplan (Greg Kaplan) and Michael Brennan of e61 Institute about Australia's stagnant productivity growth and how to fix it. The 2010s saw Australia's weakest productivity growth in 60 years. It was in many ways a lost decade. And it's dragging on—unlike the US, we haven't bounced out of covid with strong productivity growth. We discuss the extent to which this is being (i) caused by frontier-wide factors; (ii) caused by Australia-specific factors; and (iii) simply an artefact of how productivity is measured. We also go into a bunch of specific ideas, like: - why it could be better to densify Canberra than Sydney/Melbourne; - what should Albo do if he was bullish on AI; and - what we can learn from the stunning innovativeness of Australia's agricultural sector. And we discuss deeper questions around the role of government—as it's not really clear what levers the government currently has over productivity (at least for its *growth rate*). Links below. Enjoy! Timestamps: (0:00:00) - Introduction. (0:01:47) - Why has construction productivity stagnated—in Australia and the West? (0:08:38) - Can housing supply meaningfully grow just by improving construction productivity (without planning reform)? (0:12:50) - If construction and regulatory bottlenecks ease, what becomes the new supply constraint? (0:21:49) - Would densifying Sydney/Melbourne deliver big productivity gains—or should smaller cities scale? (0:29:48) - The most important limitations of GDP as a metric. (0:34:29) - Growth accounting in ~8 minutes: capital, labour, TFP. (0:43:04) - Is there a single “north-star” metric for policymakers? (0:47:12) - Should policymakers care more about TFP or labour productivity? (0:52:11) - Why revenue per worker is an imperfect proxy for firm-level productivity. (0:56:00) - Do these measurement critiques change what policy should do now? (0:58:25) - Stylised facts about the Australian economy. (1:04:01) - Status update on the health of the Australian economy. (1:06:43) - What would it take for Australia to be the richest country again? (1:11:23) - What growth rates are realistically achievable for Australia? (1:15:24) - How much GDP do we forgo over 10 years if weak productivity persists? (1:16:23) - Services, Baumol’s cost disease, and measurement. (1:29:18) - Lowest-hanging fruit for quality/productivity gains in services. (1:35:29) - Australia-specific vs frontier-wide causes of the slowdown. (1:39:51) - Best/worst Australian industries for TFP (i.e. “MFP”) growth over recent decades. (1:53:18) - Why has TFP slowed across almost every industry? (The chart behind the slowdown.) (1:59:41) - What is Australia’s “single most productive” company? (2:01:43) - Which industries have the biggest gaps between frontier and laggard firms? (2:07:53) - Is the median US firm more productive than its Australian counterpart, or is the US average skewed by superstars? (2:10:10) - What would Australian management look like if we converged on US practices? (2:13:15) - Why has the US—almost alone among rich countries—had strong recent productivity growth? (2:15:11) - How much of the US–Australia TFP gap is “culture”? (2:21:21) - Minimum reforms needed to restore 1–2% annual labour-productivity growth? (2:24:38) - Beyond Sydney/Melbourne: building (or scaling) new cities. (2:28:59) - If you were Anthony Albanese and bullish on AI, what would you do? (2:31:21) - How important is the CSIRO to Australia’s TFP? (2:33:02) - Three sensible reforms: tax; carbon pricing; road-user charging. (2:40:46) - Are the 1980s microeconomic reforms overrated? (2:44:33) - What levers reach the productivity growth rate—or is lifting levels the only game? (2:49:54) - Are we too concerned about the reform era ending? (2:56:12) - Most non-obvious lessons from the reform era.

Had so much fun chatting with Greg Kaplan (Greg Kaplan) and Michael Brennan of e61 Institute about Australia's stagnant productivity growth and how to fix it. The 2010s saw Australia's weakest productivity growth in 60 years. It was in many ways a lost decade. And it's dragging on—unlike the US, we haven't bounced out of covid with strong productivity growth. We discuss the extent to which this is being (i) caused by frontier-wide factors; (ii) caused by Australia-specific factors; and (iii) simply an artefact of how productivity is measured. We also go into a bunch of specific ideas, like: - why it could be better to densify Canberra than Sydney/Melbourne; - what should Albo do if he was bullish on AI; and - what we can learn from the stunning innovativeness of Australia's agricultural sector. And we discuss deeper questions around the role of government—as it's not really clear what levers the government currently has over productivity (at least for its growth rate). Links below. Enjoy! Timestamps: (0:00:00) - Introduction. (0:01:47) - Why has construction productivity stagnated—in Australia and the West? (0:08:38) - Can housing supply meaningfully grow just by improving construction productivity (without planning reform)? (0:12:50) - If construction and regulatory bottlenecks ease, what becomes the new supply constraint? (0:21:49) - Would densifying Sydney/Melbourne deliver big productivity gains—or should smaller cities scale? (0:29:48) - The most important limitations of GDP as a metric. (0:34:29) - Growth accounting in ~8 minutes: capital, labour, TFP. (0:43:04) - Is there a single “north-star” metric for policymakers? (0:47:12) - Should policymakers care more about TFP or labour productivity? (0:52:11) - Why revenue per worker is an imperfect proxy for firm-level productivity. (0:56:00) - Do these measurement critiques change what policy should do now? (0:58:25) - Stylised facts about the Australian economy. (1:04:01) - Status update on the health of the Australian economy. (1:06:43) - What would it take for Australia to be the richest country again? (1:11:23) - What growth rates are realistically achievable for Australia? (1:15:24) - How much GDP do we forgo over 10 years if weak productivity persists? (1:16:23) - Services, Baumol’s cost disease, and measurement. (1:29:18) - Lowest-hanging fruit for quality/productivity gains in services. (1:35:29) - Australia-specific vs frontier-wide causes of the slowdown. (1:39:51) - Best/worst Australian industries for TFP (i.e. “MFP”) growth over recent decades. (1:53:18) - Why has TFP slowed across almost every industry? (The chart behind the slowdown.) (1:59:41) - What is Australia’s “single most productive” company? (2:01:43) - Which industries have the biggest gaps between frontier and laggard firms? (2:07:53) - Is the median US firm more productive than its Australian counterpart, or is the US average skewed by superstars? (2:10:10) - What would Australian management look like if we converged on US practices? (2:13:15) - Why has the US—almost alone among rich countries—had strong recent productivity growth? (2:15:11) - How much of the US–Australia TFP gap is “culture”? (2:21:21) - Minimum reforms needed to restore 1–2% annual labour-productivity growth? (2:24:38) - Beyond Sydney/Melbourne: building (or scaling) new cities. (2:28:59) - If you were Anthony Albanese and bullish on AI, what would you do? (2:31:21) - How important is the CSIRO to Australia’s TFP? (2:33:02) - Three sensible reforms: tax; carbon pricing; road-user charging. (2:40:46) - Are the 1980s microeconomic reforms overrated? (2:44:33) - What levers reach the productivity growth rate—or is lifting levels the only game? (2:49:54) - Are we too concerned about the reform era ending? (2:56:12) - Most non-obvious lessons from the reform era.

Joseph Noel Walker

128,950 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Only Canada is in a recession ‼️ France isn’t. The UK isn’t. Japan isn’t. The United States isn’t. Trump put tariffs on almost every major economy. So why is Canada the weakest in the entire G7? Because the problems didn’t start with tariffs. They started decades ago. Since 2000, Canadian labour productivity has grown at 0.8% a year. The U.S. grew at 1.9%. In 2002 Canadian businesses produced 83% of what American ones did per hour. By 2019 it was 73%. Today we’re barely over 60%. The gap didn’t close. It got bigger. Productivity is the engine. Tariffs were just the hill. A weak engine struggles. A strong one barely notices. Higher productivity means higher wages. More tax revenue without raising taxes. An economy that can actually handle shocks. Tariffs hurt. But they didn’t create Canada’s economic problems. They just exposed them. This is what 11 years of Liberal mismanagement looks like ! #cdnpoli #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst

🚨 Only Canada is in a recession ‼️ France isn’t. The UK isn’t. Japan isn’t. The United States isn’t. Trump put tariffs on almost every major economy. So why is Canada the weakest in the entire G7? Because the problems didn’t start with tariffs. They started decades ago. Since 2000, Canadian labour productivity has grown at 0.8% a year. The U.S. grew at 1.9%. In 2002 Canadian businesses produced 83% of what American ones did per hour. By 2019 it was 73%. Today we’re barely over 60%. The gap didn’t close. It got bigger. Productivity is the engine. Tariffs were just the hill. A weak engine struggles. A strong one barely notices. Higher productivity means higher wages. More tax revenue without raising taxes. An economy that can actually handle shocks. Tariffs hurt. But they didn’t create Canada’s economic problems. They just exposed them. This is what 11 years of Liberal mismanagement looks like ! #cdnpoli #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

10,996 views • 6 days ago

How many Canadians are one maxed out credit card away from trouble? A family moved from Ontario to Nova Scotia for a cheaper life. Instead, groceries went on the credit card. Rent doubled, debt piled up and now they're looking for second jobs. They're not alone. StatsCan says household debt is outpacing incomes. The Bank of Canada keeps warning about Canada's productivity problem. Yet where is the urgency? We don't have an affordability crisis because Canadians forgot how to budget. We have an income and productivity crisis. Canada has the resources. Canada has the talent. But if we don't invest in industries that create higher-paying jobs and higher output, more families will be forced to borrow just to stand still.

How many Canadians are one maxed out credit card away from trouble? A family moved from Ontario to Nova Scotia for a cheaper life. Instead, groceries went on the credit card. Rent doubled, debt piled up and now they're looking for second jobs. They're not alone. StatsCan says household debt is outpacing incomes. The Bank of Canada keeps warning about Canada's productivity problem. Yet where is the urgency? We don't have an affordability crisis because Canadians forgot how to budget. We have an income and productivity crisis. Canada has the resources. Canada has the talent. But if we don't invest in industries that create higher-paying jobs and higher output, more families will be forced to borrow just to stand still.

Shazi

19,924 views • 2 months ago

Mark Carney was bragging abut how great things are and gave REAL evidence as to why... So lets fact check it: 1⃣ "Creating jobs at twice the rate of the United States" - A disproportionate share of Canada's job growth has been driven by the public sector and part time positions... especially during summer months, rather than high paying, private-sector career opportunities. In fact, the broader year-to-date numbers show that the Canadian economy has routinely struggled with heavy monthly net job losses. Despite these additions, Canada’s actual unemployment rate has consistently trended much higher than that of the U.S. 2⃣ "Highest level of foreign direct investment in 20 years" - While foreign money is arriving (largely driven by heavy government subsidies in green technology and EV plants), domestic business investment per worker has plummeted over the last decade. Economists point to the fact that while many foreign owners are buying Canadian businesses (not creating anything new and often laying off staff at these companies once ownership is transferred) domestic Canadian capital is fleeing to the U.S. and other markets because of Canada's complex regulatory hurdles and high cost of doing business. 3⃣ "We can see the Growth picking up this quarter" - Misleading. While there may be a minor quarter over quarter uptick due to specific, major project examples (like the Rio Tinto project mentioned), Canada is facing a systemic productivity crisis. While Canada’s overall GDP shows growth, its GDP per capita (economic output per person) has steadily declined. Canada actually sits near the bottom of the G7 in per-person wealth, meaning the average Canadian is technically experiencing an individual economic contraction despite the top-line national growth numbers Carney brags about. 4⃣ The carbon-neutral aluminum plant photo-op??? - announced in 2024, years before this speech. First production isn't until 2027. Capacity: 2,500 T a year. It relies on billions in taxpayer-funded subsidies and artificial price advantages through carbon taxes, rather than genuine market competitiveness, to survive. This initiative represents massive corporate welfare for a large multinational that fails to address broader, systemic declines in Canadian productivity and investment... and on its face, is not competitive in any beneficial way to the Canadian public at this time... or if the net zero climate hysteria eventually fades completely (which it already is in many nations) 5⃣ Mark Carney is painting a picture of an economy undergoing a booming structural transformation. The omitted reality is that the top-line numbers look healthy primarily because of aggressive population expansion and massive government capital injections into specific green sectors.

Mark Carney was bragging abut how great things are and gave REAL evidence as to why... So lets fact check it: 1⃣ "Creating jobs at twice the rate of the United States" - A disproportionate share of Canada's job growth has been driven by the public sector and part time positions... especially during summer months, rather than high paying, private-sector career opportunities. In fact, the broader year-to-date numbers show that the Canadian economy has routinely struggled with heavy monthly net job losses. Despite these additions, Canada’s actual unemployment rate has consistently trended much higher than that of the U.S. 2⃣ "Highest level of foreign direct investment in 20 years" - While foreign money is arriving (largely driven by heavy government subsidies in green technology and EV plants), domestic business investment per worker has plummeted over the last decade. Economists point to the fact that while many foreign owners are buying Canadian businesses (not creating anything new and often laying off staff at these companies once ownership is transferred) domestic Canadian capital is fleeing to the U.S. and other markets because of Canada's complex regulatory hurdles and high cost of doing business. 3⃣ "We can see the Growth picking up this quarter" - Misleading. While there may be a minor quarter over quarter uptick due to specific, major project examples (like the Rio Tinto project mentioned), Canada is facing a systemic productivity crisis. While Canada’s overall GDP shows growth, its GDP per capita (economic output per person) has steadily declined. Canada actually sits near the bottom of the G7 in per-person wealth, meaning the average Canadian is technically experiencing an individual economic contraction despite the top-line national growth numbers Carney brags about. 4⃣ The carbon-neutral aluminum plant photo-op??? - announced in 2024, years before this speech. First production isn't until 2027. Capacity: 2,500 T a year. It relies on billions in taxpayer-funded subsidies and artificial price advantages through carbon taxes, rather than genuine market competitiveness, to survive. This initiative represents massive corporate welfare for a large multinational that fails to address broader, systemic declines in Canadian productivity and investment... and on its face, is not competitive in any beneficial way to the Canadian public at this time... or if the net zero climate hysteria eventually fades completely (which it already is in many nations) 5⃣ Mark Carney is painting a picture of an economy undergoing a booming structural transformation. The omitted reality is that the top-line numbers look healthy primarily because of aggressive population expansion and massive government capital injections into specific green sectors.

Jasmin Laine

41,027 views • 8 days ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz and the idea of a U.S. escort for tankers may be little more than PR in practice. Fmr U.S. Navy Malcolm Nance made it simple. "We heard that radio warning the other day. 'This is your last warning, we will destroy you if you don't turn around.' The ship turned around. By the way, that tanker was operating under U.S. guidance, not U.S. escort. The U.S. has escorted no one." Malcolm Nance

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz and the idea of a U.S. escort for tankers may be little more than PR in practice. Fmr U.S. Navy Malcolm Nance made it simple. "We heard that radio warning the other day. 'This is your last warning, we will destroy you if you don't turn around.' The ship turned around. By the way, that tanker was operating under U.S. guidance, not U.S. escort. The U.S. has escorted no one." Malcolm Nance

Mario Nawfal

64,021 views • 12 days ago

The Canadian dollar is near its lowest point in over 20 years. This is what happens when the world loses confidence in the economy and your Prime Minister. It’s the global market, giving us an objective view of our future. Under the last Conservative government, the loonie hit historic highs. Why? Corporate tax cuts, trade surpluses, and record foreign investment flowing into Canada. Today under Carney: a recession, USMCA being exited by the US, 120,000 Canadians leaving the country in a single year, and low productivity with nearly 40% of our highest income earners leaving the country. We will now experience inflation on imports as a result. The Bank of Canada faces a difficult choice: if they lower interest rates, the dollar will decline further. If they raise interest rates, it will likely choke economic growth while inflation continues to increase. The word for it is stagflation. I think this is a key & overlooked metric of the health of our economy & future. It’s no bueno.

The Canadian dollar is near its lowest point in over 20 years. This is what happens when the world loses confidence in the economy and your Prime Minister. It’s the global market, giving us an objective view of our future. Under the last Conservative government, the loonie hit historic highs. Why? Corporate tax cuts, trade surpluses, and record foreign investment flowing into Canada. Today under Carney: a recession, USMCA being exited by the US, 120,000 Canadians leaving the country in a single year, and low productivity with nearly 40% of our highest income earners leaving the country. We will now experience inflation on imports as a result. The Bank of Canada faces a difficult choice: if they lower interest rates, the dollar will decline further. If they raise interest rates, it will likely choke economic growth while inflation continues to increase. The word for it is stagflation. I think this is a key & overlooked metric of the health of our economy & future. It’s no bueno.

Mario Zelaya

37,859 views • 1 month ago

Trump keeps stating that it's to the advantage of the U.S. if the Canadian government is Liberal. He never tells you why, but here's the reason. Canada sells oil to the U.S. at a massive discount. We are trapped in this deal because the Liberals blocked pipelines that would have expanded our markets. Trump is well aware that Carney and his decade old Liberal government are unlikely to change the situation. Carney has already said that his primary focus is on emissions reductions, not production growth or pipeline expansion. The Liberals also make for a good political foil to justify his frankly pathetic attempt to annex Canada. It allows him to continue on with this distraction. In 2 years, the midterm elections will decisively curtail Trump's power. Canada however risks being saddled with Trudeau's economic advisor and his old cabinet for another 4 years. Wake up Canada!

Trump keeps stating that it's to the advantage of the U.S. if the Canadian government is Liberal. He never tells you why, but here's the reason. Canada sells oil to the U.S. at a massive discount. We are trapped in this deal because the Liberals blocked pipelines that would have expanded our markets. Trump is well aware that Carney and his decade old Liberal government are unlikely to change the situation. Carney has already said that his primary focus is on emissions reductions, not production growth or pipeline expansion. The Liberals also make for a good political foil to justify his frankly pathetic attempt to annex Canada. It allows him to continue on with this distraction. In 2 years, the midterm elections will decisively curtail Trump's power. Canada however risks being saddled with Trudeau's economic advisor and his old cabinet for another 4 years. Wake up Canada!

David Jacobs

776,566 views • 1 year ago

David is warning that there is a serious chance that Israel could be completely destroyed the longer this war with Iran drags on. He says Iran has a “dead man’s switch” over the economic fate of the Gulf countries. He warns that Israel may not hesitate to launch a nuclear missile if it becomes desperate. “Israel is getting hit harder than it ever has before in its history.”

David is warning that there is a serious chance that Israel could be completely destroyed the longer this war with Iran drags on. He says Iran has a “dead man’s switch” over the economic fate of the Gulf countries. He warns that Israel may not hesitate to launch a nuclear missile if it becomes desperate. “Israel is getting hit harder than it ever has before in its history.”

Shadow of Ezra

306,098 views • 5 months ago

What if we forgot the people, the stories, and the sacrifices that shaped Canada? This Canada Day, the Canadian Institute for Historical Education invites you to reflect on why our history matters—and what’s at stake when we stop remembering it. Please watch the video. Share the message. Help us preserve the legacy of those who built this country. Because together, we make history. The CIHE is a non-partisan, not-for-profit research organization dedicated to promoting historical literacy in Canada. You can support us by making a donation at #CanadaDay #History #ContextMatters

What if we forgot the people, the stories, and the sacrifices that shaped Canada? This Canada Day, the Canadian Institute for Historical Education invites you to reflect on why our history matters—and what’s at stake when we stop remembering it. Please watch the video. Share the message. Help us preserve the legacy of those who built this country. Because together, we make history. The CIHE is a non-partisan, not-for-profit research organization dedicated to promoting historical literacy in Canada. You can support us by making a donation at #CanadaDay #History #ContextMatters

Canadian Institute for Historical Education

134,426 views • 1 year ago

The changes in the US over the last decade — rising inequality, massive deficits, and a shifting global outlook — are not isolated events. They are all interconnected and part of a dynamic that has occurred many times before for largely the same reasons. Understanding the mechanics at play matters far more than reacting to any short-term noise. Studying these patterns can help you understand why populism of the right and the left is rising around the world, and why so many find it difficult to resolve their seemingly irreconcilable differences. At least, that’s how I see it. I’m curious to hear if you agree.

The changes in the US over the last decade — rising inequality, massive deficits, and a shifting global outlook — are not isolated events. They are all interconnected and part of a dynamic that has occurred many times before for largely the same reasons. Understanding the mechanics at play matters far more than reacting to any short-term noise. Studying these patterns can help you understand why populism of the right and the left is rising around the world, and why so many find it difficult to resolve their seemingly irreconcilable differences. At least, that’s how I see it. I’m curious to hear if you agree.

Ray Dalio

91,560 views • 6 months ago

🇨🇳 🇨🇦 2 days after testifying in Parliament, Canadian police showed up at his door with a court-approved threat warning. Nat. Sec. Reporter Sam Cooper says his confidence is at 100%. "Xi and the Politburo, the senior levels of Chinese military and intelligence are not only aware of it, but some of them are hands on involved in it." This isn't a theory... law enforcement from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom are telling him directly. Sam Cooper

🇨🇳 🇨🇦 2 days after testifying in Parliament, Canadian police showed up at his door with a court-approved threat warning. Nat. Sec. Reporter Sam Cooper says his confidence is at 100%. "Xi and the Politburo, the senior levels of Chinese military and intelligence are not only aware of it, but some of them are hands on involved in it." This isn't a theory... law enforcement from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom are telling him directly. Sam Cooper

Mario Nawfal

184,835 views • 3 months ago

💥BREAKING NEWS💥 #POTUS 🇺🇸says he will put massive tariffs on Canadian 🇨🇦Fertilizer to spur domestic production. Is #uranium next? To produce fertilizer, you need to mine #Potash of which America has virtually none and would starve without Canada's trade. The US is no longer our reliable trading partner. 🤡 Can America produce as much potash as Canada? No — not even close. And it’s not because the U.S. lacks technology — it’s because the U.S. simply does not have the massive potash deposits that Canada has. Canada World’s #1 potash producer Provides over 30% of global production Saskatchewan alone holds ~half of the world’s known potash reserves Canada’s potash industry is enormous, highly efficient, and built around some of the richest deposits on Earth. United States The U.S. produces very small quantities(mainly from New Mexico and Utah, mostly from brines) Total U.S. production is roughly 1–2% of global supply U.S. production cannot expand dramatically because its geological reserves are limited Could America ever match Canadian output? No — not geologically possible. The U.S. does not possess the multi-billion-ton underground potash basins like Saskatchewan.

💥BREAKING NEWS💥 #POTUS 🇺🇸says he will put massive tariffs on Canadian 🇨🇦Fertilizer to spur domestic production. Is #uranium next? To produce fertilizer, you need to mine #Potash of which America has virtually none and would starve without Canada's trade. The US is no longer our reliable trading partner. 🤡 Can America produce as much potash as Canada? No — not even close. And it’s not because the U.S. lacks technology — it’s because the U.S. simply does not have the massive potash deposits that Canada has. Canada World’s #1 potash producer Provides over 30% of global production Saskatchewan alone holds ~half of the world’s known potash reserves Canada’s potash industry is enormous, highly efficient, and built around some of the richest deposits on Earth. United States The U.S. produces very small quantities(mainly from New Mexico and Utah, mostly from brines) Total U.S. production is roughly 1–2% of global supply U.S. production cannot expand dramatically because its geological reserves are limited Could America ever match Canadian output? No — not geologically possible. The U.S. does not possess the multi-billion-ton underground potash basins like Saskatchewan.

Nostra Thomas 🇨🇦

107,693 views • 8 months ago

This may genuinely be the most obnoxious thing I’ve ever heard in my life over a $100 card Why are breakers like this? If this is for you, great enjoy it. Not sure I could last 5 seconds in someone stream that screams at the top of his lungs over this.

This may genuinely be the most obnoxious thing I’ve ever heard in my life over a $100 card Why are breakers like this? If this is for you, great enjoy it. Not sure I could last 5 seconds in someone stream that screams at the top of his lungs over this.

JoinMyDiscordToday

45,484 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇮🇷 NO QUICK OFF RAMP? WAR MAY DRAG FOR WEEKS Energy expert Nabil Abou Naccoul says the signals he’s seeing suggest this conflict lasts longer than many expect. He points to Gulf states lobbying to shorten the war and a shift in U.S. rhetoric away from immediate regime change. If markets conclude this is a multi week war, he believes oil could eventually reprice higher, even if it has not fully reacted yet.

🚨🇮🇷 NO QUICK OFF RAMP? WAR MAY DRAG FOR WEEKS Energy expert Nabil Abou Naccoul says the signals he’s seeing suggest this conflict lasts longer than many expect. He points to Gulf states lobbying to shorten the war and a shift in U.S. rhetoric away from immediate regime change. If markets conclude this is a multi week war, he believes oil could eventually reprice higher, even if it has not fully reacted yet.

Mario Nawfal

38,223 views • 5 months ago

Canada is sleepwalking into a TRANSPORTATION DISASTER. The federal govt is about to create a regulatory mess where Canadian trucking companies may not even be able to buy new U.S. heavy-duty trucks by 2027. No trucks = higher shipping costs Higher shipping costs = higher food prices Higher food prices = more pain for Canadians already drowning And remember… nearly EVERYTHING in this country moves by truck. The same people who caused the inflation crisis are now threatening the backbone of Canada’s economy with ideological emissions rules nobody else wants. This could get ugly FAST.

Canada is sleepwalking into a TRANSPORTATION DISASTER. The federal govt is about to create a regulatory mess where Canadian trucking companies may not even be able to buy new U.S. heavy-duty trucks by 2027. No trucks = higher shipping costs Higher shipping costs = higher food prices Higher food prices = more pain for Canadians already drowning And remember… nearly EVERYTHING in this country moves by truck. The same people who caused the inflation crisis are now threatening the backbone of Canada’s economy with ideological emissions rules nobody else wants. This could get ugly FAST.

Marc Nixon

150,574 views • 2 months ago

Canada is bleeding intellectual property—a serious problem for capital investment, productivity, innovation, and job creation. When asked what his strategy is to stop the bleeding, Carney stumbled terribly. It’s clear he has no strategy on how to reverse this, which is a big problem if we’re ever going to solve the economic problems Canada faces after a decade of bad Liberal policy. The facts: - Over 75% of Canadian-funded AI research ends up owned by foreign firms. - >50% of industry-directed IP generated by Canadian universities is assigned to foreign companies. Some operate in adversarial nations - Over the last 20 years, Canadian patents transferred to foreign firms has TRIPLED -Canada averages half as many patents per owner as the world, making it harder for our innovators to scale. IP is not just paperwork, but rather the foundation upon which our future industries, jobs, and sovereignty is built. We cannot afford to have a PM with no strategy on IP.

Canada is bleeding intellectual property—a serious problem for capital investment, productivity, innovation, and job creation. When asked what his strategy is to stop the bleeding, Carney stumbled terribly. It’s clear he has no strategy on how to reverse this, which is a big problem if we’re ever going to solve the economic problems Canada faces after a decade of bad Liberal policy. The facts: - Over 75% of Canadian-funded AI research ends up owned by foreign firms. - >50% of industry-directed IP generated by Canadian universities is assigned to foreign companies. Some operate in adversarial nations - Over the last 20 years, Canadian patents transferred to foreign firms has TRIPLED -Canada averages half as many patents per owner as the world, making it harder for our innovators to scale. IP is not just paperwork, but rather the foundation upon which our future industries, jobs, and sovereignty is built. We cannot afford to have a PM with no strategy on IP.

Raquel Dancho

41,289 views • 10 months ago

Before Carney was elected many of us were already warning Canadians that Carney really wasn’t the “master economist” he claimed to be. Here in January of 2025 he got every economic prediction wrong. ❌Trumps tariffs would stop the U.S. economy - it has not ❌Move up inflation - inflation has been holding steady at 2.7% ❌Raise interest rates - interest rates have not moved. Clearly everything he says is nothing more than guess work & wishful thinking & now Canada is in recession.

Before Carney was elected many of us were already warning Canadians that Carney really wasn’t the “master economist” he claimed to be. Here in January of 2025 he got every economic prediction wrong. ❌Trumps tariffs would stop the U.S. economy - it has not ❌Move up inflation - inflation has been holding steady at 2.7% ❌Raise interest rates - interest rates have not moved. Clearly everything he says is nothing more than guess work & wishful thinking & now Canada is in recession.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

26,979 views • 2 months ago