Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Cheap attack drones pose an expensive problem. Some cost as little as $20,000, but shooting them down with interceptor missiles can cost millions. A possible solution: lasers that can zap drones out of the sky for just a few dollars per shot.

60 Minutes

1,429,117 subscribers

30,362 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Bilim & Teknoloji Finans

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

$Iran is increasingly relying on drones to strike targets across the Middle East, using unmanned systems that can be produced far more quickly and at a fraction of the cost of traditional missiles, CBS News' Holly Williams reports. One of the main drones being used is the Shahed drone, which costs an estimated $20,000 to $50,000 per unit, compared with missiles that can cost millions of dollars. The widespread use of drones is reshaping modern warfare, a trend already seen on the battlefield in Ukraine and now playing out across the Middle East.$

Iran is increasingly relying on drones to strike targets across the Middle East, using unmanned systems that can be produced far more quickly and at a fraction of the cost of traditional missiles, CBS News' Holly Williams reports. One of the main drones being used is the Shahed drone, which costs an estimated $20,000 to $50,000 per unit, compared with missiles that can cost millions of dollars. The widespread use of drones is reshaping modern warfare, a trend already seen on the battlefield in Ukraine and now playing out across the Middle East.

CBS News

15,802 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Pentagon is negotiating the purchase of Ukrainian interceptor drones. Just like us, they want to shoot down Iranian Shahed drones without wasting missiles that cost millions of dollars. Our Community helped bring interceptor drones into existence and scale this technology. We believed it was possible when most people thought the idea was crazy. And here we are — another video showing successful interceptions, including Shaheds equipped with cameras (spoiler: it didn’t help them). But you can help the Ukrainian Armed Forces shoot down even more Russian and Iranian drones. Donate and help Ukraine! PayPal (For non-lethal purchases): sternenkopaypal@gmail.com

The Pentagon is negotiating the purchase of Ukrainian interceptor drones. Just like us, they want to shoot down Iranian Shahed drones without wasting missiles that cost millions of dollars. Our Community helped bring interceptor drones into existence and scale this technology. We believed it was possible when most people thought the idea was crazy. And here we are — another video showing successful interceptions, including Shaheds equipped with cameras (spoiler: it didn’t help them). But you can help the Ukrainian Armed Forces shoot down even more Russian and Iranian drones. Donate and help Ukraine! PayPal (For non-lethal purchases): [email protected]

Спільнота Стерненка

47,570 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🇷🇺 NATO’S $1M PROBLEM: SHOOTING DOWN $20K DRONES On paper, NATO’s air defenses look bulletproof. Patriot missiles. F-35s. Radar that can spot a seagull over Siberia. But Russia just exposed the gap: the Alliance can’t efficiently kill cheap drones. These aren’t high-tech stealth threats - they’re flying lawnmowers with explosives. Cost: about $20,000 each. The missile Poland used to take one down? Over a million. Congratulations, you just lost the world’s most expensive trade. NATO’s radar can see them - it just doesn’t make sense to waste million-dollar missiles on what are basically DIY kamikaze kits. And stocks of those missiles? Running low. Solutions exist: lasers (unlimited ammo, power-hungry as hell), flak guns (old-school, cheap, brutal), and interceptor drones (Ukraine’s already doing it). But none are scaled. Yet. The truth: NATO built a shield for Cold War giants - not swarm-sized ghosts. Prediction: expect the next arms race to look less like “Top Gun” and more like “Terminator with Wi-Fi.” Source: BBC, Reuters, NATO Reports, The Economist

🇷🇺 NATO’S $1M PROBLEM: SHOOTING DOWN $20K DRONES On paper, NATO’s air defenses look bulletproof. Patriot missiles. F-35s. Radar that can spot a seagull over Siberia. But Russia just exposed the gap: the Alliance can’t efficiently kill cheap drones. These aren’t high-tech stealth threats - they’re flying lawnmowers with explosives. Cost: about $20,000 each. The missile Poland used to take one down? Over a million. Congratulations, you just lost the world’s most expensive trade. NATO’s radar can see them - it just doesn’t make sense to waste million-dollar missiles on what are basically DIY kamikaze kits. And stocks of those missiles? Running low. Solutions exist: lasers (unlimited ammo, power-hungry as hell), flak guns (old-school, cheap, brutal), and interceptor drones (Ukraine’s already doing it). But none are scaled. Yet. The truth: NATO built a shield for Cold War giants - not swarm-sized ghosts. Prediction: expect the next arms race to look less like “Top Gun” and more like “Terminator with Wi-Fi.” Source: BBC, Reuters, NATO Reports, The Economist

Mario Nawfal

233,637 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

$🇮🇷 Iran keeps throwing cheap Shahed-style drones at targets across the region. The idea is simple: overwhelm defenses with something that costs maybe $20k–$50k to build. But here’s the catch. You don’t always need a fancy interceptor missile to stop them. C-RAM (Counter Rocket, Artillery, Mortar) systems can just shred these slow drones with a wall of 20mm cannon fire. Think of it like a giant automated machine gun that locks on and turns incoming drones into scrap before they get close. The cost math is brutal. An interceptor missile can run anywhere from $100k to well over $1M per shot. Meanwhile C-RAM rounds cost a tiny fraction of that. So when Iran launches waves of cheap drones, sometimes the smartest defense isn’t another expensive missile. It’s just a gun that never stops talking. Source: CNBC, New York Times, NBC News, Military Show YT$

🇮🇷 Iran keeps throwing cheap Shahed-style drones at targets across the region. The idea is simple: overwhelm defenses with something that costs maybe $20k–$50k to build. But here’s the catch. You don’t always need a fancy interceptor missile to stop them. C-RAM (Counter Rocket, Artillery, Mortar) systems can just shred these slow drones with a wall of 20mm cannon fire. Think of it like a giant automated machine gun that locks on and turns incoming drones into scrap before they get close. The cost math is brutal. An interceptor missile can run anywhere from $100k to well over $1M per shot. Meanwhile C-RAM rounds cost a tiny fraction of that. So when Iran launches waves of cheap drones, sometimes the smartest defense isn’t another expensive missile. It’s just a gun that never stops talking. Source: CNBC, New York Times, NBC News, Military Show YT

Mario Nawfal

383,595 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Petraeus: Ukraine uses a layered system to stop drones — interceptor drones, heavy machine guns, helicopters and jets. The goal is to avoid using expensive missiles. Patriot interceptor can cost about $2 million, while drone interceptors are far cheaper and still effective. 2X

Petraeus: Ukraine uses a layered system to stop drones — interceptor drones, heavy machine guns, helicopters and jets. The goal is to avoid using expensive missiles. Patriot interceptor can cost about $2 million, while drone interceptors are far cheaper and still effective. 2X

Tymofiy Mylovanov

20,654 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸🇺🇦 Here’s why the U.S. suddenly wants Ukrainian interceptor drones Iran launches cheap Shahed drones that cost tens of thousands. The U.S. solution so far is to fire $4 million Patriot missiles at them. Ukraine took one look at that math and built the Sting interceptor drone. Cost: $2,000. Speed: 300 km/h. Mission: slam into the incoming drone and knock it out. Ukrainians figured out how to stop drones without burning through the GDP of a small country every week. Source: CBS

🚨🇺🇸🇺🇦 Here’s why the U.S. suddenly wants Ukrainian interceptor drones Iran launches cheap Shahed drones that cost tens of thousands. The U.S. solution so far is to fire $4 million Patriot missiles at them. Ukraine took one look at that math and built the Sting interceptor drone. Cost: $2,000. Speed: 300 km/h. Mission: slam into the incoming drone and knock it out. Ukrainians figured out how to stop drones without burning through the GDP of a small country every week. Source: CBS

Mario Nawfal

307,205 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

💥 The moment of the Shahed drone attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad Trump stated that he does not need Ukraine’s help in shooting down Iranian attack drones using cheap interceptor drones, so let them now intercept them with their own embassies.

💥 The moment of the Shahed drone attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad Trump stated that he does not need Ukraine’s help in shooting down Iranian attack drones using cheap interceptor drones, so let them now intercept them with their own embassies.

Cloooud |🇺🇦

11,554 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

It costs the U.S. millions of dollars to intercept Iran’s small, fast-moving drones. But a Texas-based defense robotics company says it has developed a cheaper solution, one that could take down a drone for as little as 10 bucks.

It costs the U.S. millions of dollars to intercept Iran’s small, fast-moving drones. But a Texas-based defense robotics company says it has developed a cheaper solution, one that could take down a drone for as little as 10 bucks.

Brooke Taylor

567,698 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🇺🇦🇩🇪 Russia’s Shahed drones meet a German wall. Ukraine’s German supplied Rheinmetall Skynex air defense system has reportedly intercepted two Russian Shahed drones and a cruise missile, showcasing why gun based air defense is becoming a serious headache for Russia’s drone campaign. Skynex uses programmable 35mm AHEAD ammunition, giving Ukraine a much cheaper way to engage drones and cruise missiles compared with expensive surface to air missiles. The result: Russia can launch cheap drones, but Ukraine doesn’t have to answer with million dollar missiles every time. A nasty cost problem for Moscow. 🇷🇺

🇺🇦🇩🇪 Russia’s Shahed drones meet a German wall. Ukraine’s German supplied Rheinmetall Skynex air defense system has reportedly intercepted two Russian Shahed drones and a cruise missile, showcasing why gun based air defense is becoming a serious headache for Russia’s drone campaign. Skynex uses programmable 35mm AHEAD ammunition, giving Ukraine a much cheaper way to engage drones and cruise missiles compared with expensive surface to air missiles. The result: Russia can launch cheap drones, but Ukraine doesn’t have to answer with million dollar missiles every time. A nasty cost problem for Moscow. 🇷🇺

Defense Intelligence

11,233 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

As drones redefine modern combat, the next wave of military innovation will be low-cost interceptor systems to counter them. Bandit is Neros' response: an FPV interceptor designed for mass-scale manufacturing.

As drones redefine modern combat, the next wave of military innovation will be low-cost interceptor systems to counter them. Bandit is Neros' response: an FPV interceptor designed for mass-scale manufacturing.

Neros Technologies

25,214 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Palmer Luckey: With our system, one person can understand everything that’s happening across hundreds of square miles. That’s a total game changer, especially for military applications where people imagine you can just have an unlimited number of people but that’s not true — As far as other products, we’ve built things that enhance the capabilities of our sentry towers. One of them is Anvil, which is a counter-drone interceptor that can knock other drones out of the sky.

Palmer Luckey: With our system, one person can understand everything that’s happening across hundreds of square miles. That’s a total game changer, especially for military applications where people imagine you can just have an unlimited number of people but that’s not true — As far as other products, we’ve built things that enhance the capabilities of our sentry towers. One of them is Anvil, which is a counter-drone interceptor that can knock other drones out of the sky.

Ian Miles Cheong

12,455 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

UPDATE: Ukrainian intelligence used naval drone to launch a smaller attack drone, which then took out one of Russia’s S400 defense system. 🇺🇦🇷🇺 The S-400 is one of Russia’s most prized air defense systems, built to shoot down aircraft, drones, and missiles at long range. The cost gap is staggering. A single S-400 launcher and its support systems can cost billions of dollars. The drones used to destroy it likely cost only in thousands. What is genuinely new is the method. Ukraine used a naval drone, built for sea warfare, as a launch platform to carry smaller FPV drones against land targets.

UPDATE: Ukrainian intelligence used naval drone to launch a smaller attack drone, which then took out one of Russia’s S400 defense system. 🇺🇦🇷🇺 The S-400 is one of Russia’s most prized air defense systems, built to shoot down aircraft, drones, and missiles at long range. The cost gap is staggering. A single S-400 launcher and its support systems can cost billions of dollars. The drones used to destroy it likely cost only in thousands. What is genuinely new is the method. Ukraine used a naval drone, built for sea warfare, as a launch platform to carry smaller FPV drones against land targets.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

49,652 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🇮🇷🇦🇪 Iran's drones cost $20,000 to $50,000. The missiles Gulf states fire to shoot them down cost up to $1 million each. It costs over $25,000 an hour just to keep an F-16 in the air hunting them. The UAE has shot down 1,600+ drones this month alone. Pentagon advisers are calling it "not sustainable in any way, shape or form." Source: Financial Times

🚨🇮🇷🇦🇪 Iran's drones cost $20,000 to $50,000. The missiles Gulf states fire to shoot them down cost up to $1 million each. It costs over $25,000 an hour just to keep an F-16 in the air hunting them. The UAE has shot down 1,600+ drones this month alone. Pentagon advisers are calling it "not sustainable in any way, shape or form." Source: Financial Times

Mario Nawfal

263,098 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Not every answer to Russian drones has to cost a fortune. Sweden is sending Ukraine a smarter one. ㅤ Ukraine will receive modern Tridon Mk2 air defense systems as part of Sweden’s aid, with €400 million allocated for their procurement. The system uses a 40 mm Bofors automatic cannon, works day and night in all weather, can hit targets up to 12 km away, and uses programmable airburst munitions that are especially effective against drones and cruise missiles. Just as important, its cost per shot is relatively low, which matters in a war where cheap mass attacks are meant to drain expensive defenses. ㅤ This is what real support looks like: not words, but a practical shield Ukraine can keep using. ㅤ

Not every answer to Russian drones has to cost a fortune. Sweden is sending Ukraine a smarter one. ㅤ Ukraine will receive modern Tridon Mk2 air defense systems as part of Sweden’s aid, with €400 million allocated for their procurement. The system uses a 40 mm Bofors automatic cannon, works day and night in all weather, can hit targets up to 12 km away, and uses programmable airburst munitions that are especially effective against drones and cruise missiles. Just as important, its cost per shot is relatively low, which matters in a war where cheap mass attacks are meant to drain expensive defenses. ㅤ This is what real support looks like: not words, but a practical shield Ukraine can keep using. ㅤ

Meanwhile in Ukraine

87,356 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

RussiaNews 🇷🇺

13,364 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨America Just Changed the Economics of War… With Light For years Iran built a strategy around one brutal equation. Launch thousands of cheap drones. Force the defender to burn through million-dollar interceptors. Bleed the defense dry. It was simple math. A Shahed drone costs roughly $30,000. Stopping it with traditional missile defenses can cost hundreds of thousands… sometimes over a million dollars per intercept. Repeat that attack a thousand times and suddenly the defender is spending billions just to stay alive. Iran understood this. They designed an entire doctrine around it. Flood the sky with cheap weapons. Overwhelm air defenses. Make defense more expensive than offense. But something just changed. The United States Navy has now deployed HELIOS, a directed-energy weapon mounted on an American destroyer operating near Iran. HELIOS is not a missile. It is a laser. And it runs on something every warship already produces… Electricity. No missile to reload. No magazine to empty. No resupply ship needed. As long as the ship’s generators are producing power, the weapon keeps firing. That means the cost of stopping a drone is no longer measured in missiles. It is measured in electricity. In practical terms… Destroying a $30,000 drone can now cost less than the power bill of a large apartment building. That single change breaks the entire economic foundation of drone saturation warfare. For years Iran invested in the strategy that made Shahed drones valuable. Cheap. Numerous. Disposable. But if directed-energy weapons like HELIOS can burn drones out of the sky at near-zero cost… The math flips. Suddenly the attacker is spending money… while the defender spends almost nothing. CENTCOM has already released footage showing HELIOS mounted on a U.S. Navy destroyer in waters near Iran. Earlier tests confirmed the system successfully destroyed multiple drones during live trials. Now the system is deployed where hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles have been passing through the same airspace. This is not a laboratory experiment anymore. This is a real battlefield. And the world is about to find out whether the future of missile defense is not another interceptor… But a beam of light. Because when America decides to change the physics of war… It usually succeeds. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

🚨America Just Changed the Economics of War… With Light For years Iran built a strategy around one brutal equation. Launch thousands of cheap drones. Force the defender to burn through million-dollar interceptors. Bleed the defense dry. It was simple math. A Shahed drone costs roughly $30,000. Stopping it with traditional missile defenses can cost hundreds of thousands… sometimes over a million dollars per intercept. Repeat that attack a thousand times and suddenly the defender is spending billions just to stay alive. Iran understood this. They designed an entire doctrine around it. Flood the sky with cheap weapons. Overwhelm air defenses. Make defense more expensive than offense. But something just changed. The United States Navy has now deployed HELIOS, a directed-energy weapon mounted on an American destroyer operating near Iran. HELIOS is not a missile. It is a laser. And it runs on something every warship already produces… Electricity. No missile to reload. No magazine to empty. No resupply ship needed. As long as the ship’s generators are producing power, the weapon keeps firing. That means the cost of stopping a drone is no longer measured in missiles. It is measured in electricity. In practical terms… Destroying a $30,000 drone can now cost less than the power bill of a large apartment building. That single change breaks the entire economic foundation of drone saturation warfare. For years Iran invested in the strategy that made Shahed drones valuable. Cheap. Numerous. Disposable. But if directed-energy weapons like HELIOS can burn drones out of the sky at near-zero cost… The math flips. Suddenly the attacker is spending money… while the defender spends almost nothing. CENTCOM has already released footage showing HELIOS mounted on a U.S. Navy destroyer in waters near Iran. Earlier tests confirmed the system successfully destroyed multiple drones during live trials. Now the system is deployed where hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles have been passing through the same airspace. This is not a laboratory experiment anymore. This is a real battlefield. And the world is about to find out whether the future of missile defense is not another interceptor… But a beam of light. Because when America decides to change the physics of war… It usually succeeds. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

790,537 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Low-cost defense is the real challenge in modern warfare. Admiral Mark Montgomery says intercepting missiles remains extremely expensive and complex. When attack drones are cheap, that issue could determine everything. "We are now developing a long-range strike missile that comes at 10% of the cost. The only country that has them right now is Ukraine." Mark Montgomery

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Low-cost defense is the real challenge in modern warfare. Admiral Mark Montgomery says intercepting missiles remains extremely expensive and complex. When attack drones are cheap, that issue could determine everything. "We are now developing a long-range strike missile that comes at 10% of the cost. The only country that has them right now is Ukraine." Mark Montgomery

Mario Nawfal

35,974 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Iran may attack U.S. forces with $400 cost interceptor drones — like rus-sian «Molniya». Its significantly cheaper than the Shahed drone and has a range of up to 60 km, when the width of the Strait of Hormuz is 40–50 km. While the missiles for Patriot systems — likely to be often used by the U.S. to intercept these threats — cost about $4M. How do you like that cost ratio?😉 In this video, we’ll discuss how 7 Corps experience can help in countering Iran. And about the capability to mass-produce low-cost interceptor drones (with Генерал Черешня 🍒). Watch the video, like and share this post!👍

Iran may attack U.S. forces with $400 cost interceptor drones — like rus-sian «Molniya». Its significantly cheaper than the Shahed drone and has a range of up to 60 km, when the width of the Strait of Hormuz is 40–50 km. While the missiles for Patriot systems — likely to be often used by the U.S. to intercept these threats — cost about $4M. How do you like that cost ratio?😉 In this video, we’ll discuss how 7 Corps experience can help in countering Iran. And about the capability to mass-produce low-cost interceptor drones (with Генерал Черешня 🍒). Watch the video, like and share this post!👍

7th Corps of AAF

73,748 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce