Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

China responded to the AI slowdown calls. "Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance, which serves no one's interest." American CEOs are saying slow down. China is saying keep going. That gap between the two positions is the most important thing happening...

121,677 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

JoseSanchezM profil fotoğrafı
JoseSanchezM2 gün önce

Told ya. This is purely politics. Nothing else will make Elon Musk change a tweet argument so fast than Donald J Trump

Daniele Vella profil fotoğrafı
Daniele Vella2 gün önce

i think 'slow down' is doing too much work here... is the disagreement about frontier research, or about how models get deployed?

Bhavik Shah profil fotoğrafı
Bhavik Shah2 gün önce

The real challenge may be finding a middle ground between moving fast and managing the risks.

Rishi Jain profil fotoğrafı
Rishi Jain2 gün önce

This is like a great conditions building up. Chinese flexing their strength. Won’t let the cartels come up .

Ibesh profil fotoğrafı
Ibesh2 gün önce

this split makes any slowdown deal impossible. us labs can talk pause all they want, if china says full speed ahead everyone just keeps racing anyway

Tech Enthu profil fotoğrafı
Tech Enthu2 gün önce

This is getting murkier. Both US and China can't afford to put breaks on AI. I heard there are some nasty things happening in Darknet about AI usage. This is much more than just a danger sign. Someone need to find a solution.

Mudit Das profil fotoğrafı
Mudit Das2 gün önce

I fully support rapid progress in AI.

sanjay samad profil fotoğrafı
sanjay samad2 gün önce

Two poles apart is defining always a balanced way. No matter in long time most of the time one side always win but might be that winning proposition is not favouring all the world

G profil fotoğrafı
G2 gün önce

I wonder if China is already ahead in this game.

Tommy|Aura coding profil fotoğrafı
Tommy|Aura coding2 gün önce

The divergence is also a measurement problem: “slow down” can mean frontier deployment controls, while “keep going” can mean capability investment. Compare concrete thresholds—training scale, eval gates, and incident disclosure—to see whether the gap is policy or rhetoric.

Benzer Videolar