Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Come on!!! WHO on this planet can just stroll into a scene and effortlessly command e every pair of eyes!!? And yet, despite the apparent artifice, the natural electricity that seems to always make her appear as if you could just reach out and touch her…that immediate connection with...

36,850 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

One of best things about being a Janet Jackson fan is watching people discover how amazing she is. “It’s not just her beauty, because she’s beautiful inside and out. It’s not just her stunning choreography. It’s not just her ridiculous understanding of music. My God. She has done almost every genre of music you can think of, and it’s phenomenal. And it’s not just her love of herself, her presence, her power, or her unapologetic sexuality. But for me, when I see this woman, especially as a Black woman, I’m like, “Oh my God, you have literally done it all.” You have so unapologetically stepped into your power. Control was clearly one of the first expressions of that, but to see that power continue to elevate and evolve is so inspiring. I’m like, “Oh my God.” I genuinely think watching her has been healing some part of the younger me lately. I really do. It reminds me that I really can do all the things. I really can have all the things. I can have all the love. And the fact that love is such a central focus for her, I’m like, “Yo, I don’t know another artist like her.” There never will be another artist like her. Especially today, when so much is about being showy, the fact that she remains rooted in love means something to me. I don’t know anybody else like that. And you can’t name anybody to me. You can try, but I don’t care. So, Auntie Janet, this is a love letter to you. She’ll probably never see this video. It’s fine. But that’s it. Yo, get on the Janet Jackson train if you ain’t there yet.” 📹 IG: xavier.theartist

MindingMyBusiness

11,964 views • 4 days ago

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

Terri Green

132,183 views • 6 months ago

And now we arrive at the reason why virginity is not just important but it's the entire basis of a relationship. Once you lose that it's over for you, you're bound to that person who can just move on. The heart is a different matter though and sadly for a man, it's exactly the same as the body for a woman. Will a relationship ever be the same again after your first one? I want to say yes, from the depth of my soul, I really do. But I don't know. Even with her, it was on top of earlier broken glass which made the relationship feel fake for years. Song very related (look up its lyrics). The mind is fully associative and the notion of time doesn't work within it like people think. Every single moment you live is embedded on top of both the past and the future. When you're with someone, even after the unnatural "break up" that person will be with you whenever you're with someone else. That's why they call it a "broken heart", the moment you feel something, you heart will falter, much like a broken leg will cause you to limp. By the way this isn't just psychological but physiological, it shows up on MRIs and is called Broken Heart Syndrome. It can even kill you in some cases. That's why both men and women with a body count are pure poison for your soul, they will drag you into the pit of hell with them out of which you will never emerge again. I want to believe that love can be real again, for someone like us. But I know the unsurmountable gap making it so unlikely that only God can make it so. [...And just so there's no confusion, I refused to fornicate despite the length of our relationship. I thank God every single day that despite the pressure I held on to my morals and never gave up my virginity of body.]
4:41

Sensitive content

And now we arrive at the reason why virginity is not just important but it's the entire basis of a relationship. Once you lose that it's over for you, you're bound to that person who can just move on. The heart is a different matter though and sadly for a man, it's exactly the same as the body for a woman. Will a relationship ever be the same again after your first one? I want to say yes, from the depth of my soul, I really do. But I don't know. Even with her, it was on top of earlier broken glass which made the relationship feel fake for years. Song very related (look up its lyrics). The mind is fully associative and the notion of time doesn't work within it like people think. Every single moment you live is embedded on top of both the past and the future. When you're with someone, even after the unnatural "break up" that person will be with you whenever you're with someone else. That's why they call it a "broken heart", the moment you feel something, you heart will falter, much like a broken leg will cause you to limp. By the way this isn't just psychological but physiological, it shows up on MRIs and is called Broken Heart Syndrome. It can even kill you in some cases. That's why both men and women with a body count are pure poison for your soul, they will drag you into the pit of hell with them out of which you will never emerge again. I want to believe that love can be real again, for someone like us. But I know the unsurmountable gap making it so unlikely that only God can make it so. [...And just so there's no confusion, I refused to fornicate despite the length of our relationship. I thank God every single day that despite the pressure I held on to my morals and never gave up my virginity of body.]

Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺

21,110 views • 5 months ago

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 views • 6 months ago