Comparing Bitcoin Hard Forks (BCH, BSV, Blake2B)

This is absolutely delusional, sir. To behave as though this is any kind of objectively defensible version of history explicitly highlights your complete lack of interest in intellectual honesty or good faith. Blakecoin network is “a remnant of a remnant” of the scale/economic capacity/monetary weight of the network Im trustlessly participating on daily. Surely you all haven’t deluded yourselves to such a degree that you actually BELIEVE that Bip110’ers complete abandon of the bitcoin whitepaper isn’t precisely = to Ver with Bcash and CW with SV…. There’s no way you have failed this miserably to stay humble and not let the smell of your own farts grossly inflate your sense of individual importance among the absolutely MASSIVE pool of economic & social participants on the network. To recommend to sane people that they risk every hard-HODL’d sat they have on y’all’s complete ragequit, and this consensus EXPERIMENT you and Luke-team are running, will ACTUALLY get recorded in history as among the most disgracefully SELFISH efforts in bitcoin’s crazy history. “We fired the miners” “They forked off we didn’t” You changed the hashing algorithm you fucking retards nobody is buying your bullshit.

How do you propose to fight a hostile MASF on the SHA-256 chain? Be specific and try not to call me names or invoke smelling farts

Wow that’s all? Oof. Not signaling Bip110 is not a hostile attack no matter how many times you say it, no matter how many different ways you say it. So no defense necessary. My node runs fine. Just like BCH wasn’t the “real” or “actual” bitcoin no matter how much Ver screamed it; Repetition ≠ Reality, Matt. Stop inhaling your own bullshit and take a moment to realize that when less than 1/5,000th of the economic load of the bitcoin network signals your direction, YOURE the minority fork, sir. By a MASSIVE margin. No names…but you’re inhaling your own bullshit and it’s clouding basic mathematics if you think 1/5,000th is anywhere near majority — so I’m compelled to mention it no matter your feels.

You didn’t answer the question. How will your network stop a hostile MASF in the future?

First of all...it's not my network, sir. Nor is Blukecoin yours lol. 2nd of all -- we'll stop it just as we stopped Bip110, by letting them fork-off and cry about it.

Letting them fork off is not going to work. Here's the scenario:

Is Blackrock going to give $IBIT holders their Blake2b coins???

Matthew, when I found your channel I considered myself lucky! You taught me a lot about Bitcoin, and I’ll always be grateful for that! That’s why your BIP-110 turn is so disturbing. I once recommended you without hesitation. Now I worry about newcomers finding you...!!!

BTC is a ticker. Bch is a ticker Bsv is a ticker BTC added segwit not following white paper BCH added CTOR ordering not following white paper. 2026 BSV returned Bitcoin to its original unbound protocol. Only one is following the Bitcoin white paper. That is Bitcoin using BSV

It would be interesting to see if @BTCsessions could respond to this in a factual, humble and non-aggressive way. Or is escalation still the name of the game?

Oh, there it is!! The PDF with a timeline of forks. Congrats. You are now BSV2 boys.

Yup, you're exactly the kind of person that I described in this video

Thought you were taking a break but glad you are still posting.

The winner of hardforks has been the chain with stricter rules. Based on this precedent, sha256 forked off. To correctly use the verb forked-off on a chain, one shall wait to see what free market decides. It is technically correct to use the term side-of-the-fork on both chains.

Comparing Bitcoin Hard Forks (BCH, BSV, Blake2B)

Remember pushing @COLDCARDwallet and telling your viewers to trust the device to generate their seed vs rolling their own? You only stopped recommending their devices recently because @nvk disagreed with your narrative. Otherwise, you wouldn't have changed a thing.

Go away we are all SO-sick of you!!!!

If you believe in the supremacy of running a non-mining node above all else then this is the level of mass delusion you end up having. Satoshi clearly explained that regular users don't need to run nodes.

At least make a decent chart. Here you go.

Can you make a video on how we can dump our Sha-Coins? Aka Andy Coins? Aka Saylor Tokens?

By this forks you are giving XRP a reason to flip Bitcoin.

I think the shitcoin Johnny Bravo deserves his own very special immutable jpg.

Speaking of liars and scammers ...

This video was excellent and very educational.

Stfu fed

Déjà vu, core maxis hating on other forks and forks pretending to be better than core. The blockchain and mining model is so flawed that projects that dared speeding distribution are now dying (Kaspa for example). Monero tail emissions remedies but doesn't eliminate the problem.

i think you should cover pool mining with DATUM rn. since solo mining becoming harder, many started to point their hashrate to pools, since CONVOY doesnt exists yet. but there is a DATUM pool we can use rn: Tauri told me that Chris Guida told it to him.

once a fork always a fork cut em w a knife and move on #realbitcoinonly

what is a good wallet is good to withdraw the Blake2B to?

Thank you Matt. I was able to successfully withdraw the purchased Bitcoin blake2b from @NeoxaNet to the Shrike Wallet with no issues. Much appreciated.

BlukeCoin is the real blukecoin.

Scamming too hard