Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Consumer Pricing Investigations finds ‘Surveillance pricing’ is being expanded in America “Could you be paying more for a product than the person right next to you? It's called personalized or surveillance pricing” Walmart filed highly technical patents showing AI technology is going to be used to set prices “Investigation...

35,388 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля Liam
Liam1 день назад

Personalized pricing based on surveillance and consumer data deserves serious scrutiny. People should know when their data is being used to determine what they pay.

Фото профиля Globen Glooben
Globen Glooben1 день назад

Buy in store at Costco where members pay the same price.

Фото профиля Sandra Loftis
Sandra Loftis1 день назад

Ths bullsh*t is really getting out of hand.✋️😒

Фото профиля Cara Solimo
Cara Solimo1 день назад

@HarmeetKDhillon @TheLeoTerrell @howardlutnick @ToddBlanchnosz1 HOW is this legal?

Фото профиля Sandra Loftis
Sandra Loftis1 день назад

oh my!🤭

Фото профиля Mark Gustafson
Mark Gustafson1 день назад

Let me guess who gets stuck paying more for products because of this!

Фото профиля J Parker
J Parker1 день назад

How is this remotely legal?

Фото профиля Nobody
Nobody1 день назад

You will be ripped off. And you will be happy about it.

Фото профиля BirdIsFreed
BirdIsFreed1 день назад

Another reason why I don't shop at Walmart.

Фото профиля drobertlaskey@yahoo.com
[email protected]1 день назад

Lawyers of America unite do the right thing. You will also likely get a huge take home check.

Фото профиля Kevin Sorbo
Kevin Sorbo1 день назад

The FTC has confirmed that personalized pricing using data such as location, browsing history, and shopping behavior is a real area of concern, and it is now seeking stronger disclosure from businesses.

Фото профиля Galaxy ✨✨✨
Galaxy ✨✨✨1 день назад

My Walmart has been doing it for a while AND funny how their price and Amazon's price are always the same for me. Spying and sharing 😡

Фото профиля Hecklefish4eva
Hecklefish4eva1 день назад

Bring back the items .. return that stuff for the reverse uno

Фото профиля KathyW.
KathyW.1 день назад

I don’t want to shop like this!! It seems discriminatory and unfair to consumers.

Фото профиля S. Marie
S. Marie1 день назад

Isn’t there a Consumer Protection Act that requires truth in advertising, which would include posted prices?

Фото профиля Abe Froman
Abe Froman1 день назад

If I find anyone doing this to me. I will never shop there again. Ever.

Фото профиля Arse Finder
Arse Finder1 день назад

That ain’t right.

Фото профиля MayEvaBelle
MayEvaBelle1 день назад

THIS WILL GO TO SCOTUS. I believe there is a legal foundation for a challenge.

Фото профиля ❀ soph 𖥧
❀ soph 𖥧1 день назад

Love this take

Фото профиля cwo620
cwo6201 день назад

🤬

Фото профиля Mielikki
Mielikki1 день назад

Hell must be frozen over because WPXI is usually nothing but DEI and political propaganda and never reports local stories of corruption

Фото профиля Judith Smith
Judith Smith1 день назад

Turn off your phone, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi so they can’t access your information

Фото профиля Florida Grandma
Florida Grandma1 день назад

Washington needs to defend consumers, shut down algorithmic trickery, and hold these retail giants accountable.

Фото профиля Mom
Mom1 день назад

Sounds like discrimination

Фото профиля Retarded Pineapple
Retarded Pineapple1 день назад

Walmart patented charging you more for being you.

Фото профиля ms. sweetheart
ms. sweetheart1 день назад

I didn’t think bait and switch was legal. Nor fraud. Nor false advertising. The attorneys are circling now.

Фото профиля GX5000 🇨🇦 🐾🍁❄️🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸
GX5000 🇨🇦 🐾🍁❄️🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸1 день назад

Social Credit Score Pricing incoming... 🤬

Фото профиля Rick Hogaboam 1776
Rick Hogaboam 17761 день назад

If companies can use personal data and AI to charge different people different prices for the same product, consumers deserve transparency. Pricing should be clear, consistent, and accountable.

Фото профиля LetsTalkReaL™️🎙️
LetsTalkReaL™️🎙️1 день назад

The Banking industry is using AI or what is now SI to monitor your account. Get your money out of a aBank! Go with "X" Payments.

Фото профиля MtnGirl
MtnGirl1 день назад

@Dandilionz11 Why isn’t this discrimination?

Фото профиля Moshe Chaim
Moshe Chaim1 день назад

criminal!

Фото профиля Deb Storm
Deb Storm1 день назад

So is the price different at checkout or what? If we turn off our phones will this prevent it. Maybe we should all buy a Walmart gift card and use it to make Walmart purchases.

Фото профиля Woof
Woof1 день назад

I don’t believe amazon has stopped.

Фото профиля Ghost in the machine
Ghost in the machine1 день назад

Stop giving them your money and this will end.

Похожие видео

Walmart manager confirms the store is changing prices of items from the time you pick them up to the time you get to the register “So me and my son went to Walmart to pick up some butter and some other items for my baking, and I grabbed my stuff, and I'm very aware of prices because of how high stuff is. And I go to check out and I start noticing that my prices are higher, and I'm like, okay. So I call the manager over And he comes over and he says, uh, you know, the prices can change from the time you leave the area to the time you get to the register because the computer updates” The manager confirms that just within that couple minutes they’re allowed to change the price According to Walmart they are implementing these digital pricing tags throughout all their stores and the prices can change. The CEO made a statement saying the prices will change but it’s by item, not person. He also said the price changes are supposed to be done outside of customer hours But this is a big issue for many people because with these tags the items can be changed mid-day or based on demand. Yes they’re the same price for everyone but that’s still dynamic pricing This isn’t a conspiracy theory wither, Walmart has been sued by California for issues with pricing like this more than once. So the CEO is saying one thing but what people are seeing in the stores, what their employees are saying and what lawsuits are showing is the opposite

Wall Street Apes

432,281 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Video source: a16z (2026)

Startup Archive

423,249 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I just went down this rabbit hole, and it's so fascinating. So apparently, airlines have been selling your data to competitors for years. Strange right? I know, hear me out... It's called dynamic pricing. Dynamic pricing is when a company charges you a price calculated specifically for you, based on what they know about you, rather than a fixed price everyone sees. Nobody called it surveillance. The mainstream take on dynamic pricing is that it's sinister and new. Corporations secretly watching, jacking up prices, exploiting desperation. That anger is mostly right. Dynamic pricing isn't a bug that crept into capitalism. It's the entire architecture of how information asymmetry becomes profit. Airlines have always charged different people different prices for the same seat. Hotels. Insurance companies. Actuarial profiling predates the internet. What changed isn't the behavior. It's the resolution. Your battery at 8% telling Uber you're stranded is a higher-resolution version of the taxi driver who saw you running in the rain and didn't turn the meter off. The new part is the precision. They know you searched the same flight six times. They know you're on a Mac. They know your zip code and how long you've been sitting on the page. Old dynamic pricing responded to demand. Surveillance pricing responds to you. The counterargument from the market side is real. Personalization can mean discounts. But companies optimizing for revenue will use behavioral data to find the ceiling, not the floor. What are your thoughts? Is this fair or pure greed from big corp? That's a wrap. Li is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow if that interests you. We are ONE genius away. -- P.S. I'm building a course on how the world actually works. Not the surface story, but the incentive layer underneath it. Who funds what. Who benefits from what you believe? Why the official explanation is rarely the complete one. Comment "yes" if you're interested in something like this. Waitlist opens soon.

GeniusThinking

38,698 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад