Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

CT scans are quick, painless, non-invasive tests that can identify everything from brain tumors to injuries from an accident. Now, a new study published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine shows a link between the radiation exposure from the imaging tool and cancer. The research projects that the 93...

10,490 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

2 Kommentare

Profilbild von Lisa Σ♀
Lisa Σ♀vor 1 Jahr

Surely no one saw this coming 😂 Just bc 1 CT scan is the equivalent of 100 xrays (on the LOW side.) Its always supposed to be a warranted risk, not a way to get a higher payout from a medical claim.

Profilbild von ILoveH******
ILoveH******vor 1 Jahr

@AliRogin Isn't it also the case poor mental health - simple sadness loneliness anger anxiety depression..- can lead to tumor and late stage cancer ultimately? *Not just the fact that cancer findings and agonizing treatment can lead to poor mental health.

Ähnliche Videos

CAC Coronary Artery Calcium Scan: New Heart Disease Test Causes Cancer. Major Organizations Warn Public Against It... 42 Of Every 100K Patients Develop Cancer From Ionizing Radiation. Radiation Dosage Varies 10X From One Hospital To Another, Causing 5,600 New Cases Of Cancer. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology & the United States Preventive Services Task Force do not recommend the use of heart CT scans for patients with a low or high risk of heart disease because CT scans could be more harmful than beneficial due to the relatively high dose of radiation. "Tens of millions of adults would be exposed to relatively high levels of radiation through this procedure. Doctors still have not established a standard dose of radiation to be used for heart CT scans & doses for this test vary from one hospital to another, with some patients getting 10X the amount of radiation as patients in another hospital." A 2009 study showed that one heart CT scan for the 50 million Americans who would receive the average radiation dose, these scans would result in 5,600 new cancer cases. The number of new cancer cases would be even higher if individuals were screened more than once in their lifetime. Radiation from CT scans is even of concern to the FDA even when the CT scans are necessary. On October 9, 2009, the FDA announced that it was notifying healthcare professionals that 206 patients who were being tested for stroke received CT radiation doses that were 8X the expected level at one particular medical facility. While this event involved a single kind of diagnostic test at one facility, the FDA warned that “it reflects more widespread problems with CT quality assurance programs.” Each year, over 600,000 Americans die from heart disease even though heart disease can be prevented. Although heart CT scanning may be a useful tool in detecting blockages in heart arteries, there is not enough evidence to show that this test is worth the risks, especially compared to traditional risk factor assessment. For this reason, the Cancer Prevention & Treatment Fund of the National Research Center for Women & Families agrees with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that heart CT scans are not recommended for screening for heart disease. 👇CAC Screening Radiation 10X Cancer Risk👇 👇Ionizing Radiation Risk From CAC Test👇 👇Cancer Risk From CT Scan Radiation👇 Video: Dr David Alfrey

Valerie Anne Smith

114,523 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

This Zimbabwean member of parliament whose parliamentary submission has gone viral is making a valid point based on peer-reviewed research. She is essentially saying that men who have regular sex are also reducing their risk of prostate cancer. Medical studies suggest a link between frequent ejaculation and a reduced risk of prostate cancer. However, the exact number of times a man should ejaculate per month to maintain optimal prostate health has not been definitively established. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that men who reported ejaculating at least 21 times a month had a lower risk of developing prostate cancer compared to those who ejaculated less frequently. The study, which followed over 31,000 men for several years, suggested a correlation between frequent ejaculation and a lower risk of prostate cancer. A study conducted by Australian researchers and published in the journal British Journal of Urology (BJU) in 2003 found that men who ejaculated more than five times per week in their 20s had a reduced risk of prostate cancer compared to those who ejaculated less frequently. A 2008 study in the British Journal of Urology International examined over 30,000 men and found that those who reported higher ejaculation frequency showed a lower risk of prostate cancer. A 2016 study published in the journal European Urology investigated the association between ejaculation frequency and the risk of prostate cancer. The study found that men with a higher ejaculation frequency had a lower risk of developing prostate cancer, particularly in their 40s. Men over 40 should have regular medical check-ups and discuss any concerns about their prostate health with healthcare providers such as nurses and doctors. While this data is available for us to engage with, we cannot return to the old tradition she mentions in her presentation of passing on young women from the wife’s family to older men. The JAMA study's findings do not justify the revival of the outdated and exploitative traditional practice of passing young women from the wife's family to older men. Read more here; More👇🏿

Hopewell Chin’ono

127,956 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A groundbreaking new study published in Cancer Discovery reveals that certain cancers may be detectable in the blood up to three years earlier than current diagnostic methods allow. This could revolutionize early detection—and survival rates. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a pioneer in cancer research, breaks down the findings: "This study is a game-changer. By analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)—genetic material shed by cancer into the bloodstream—researchers identified cancer mutations years before standard diagnosis. This isn’t just about early detection; it’s about monitoring recurrence post-treatment to catch metastasis before it spreads." Why This Matters: 🔹 Early Detection Saves Lives – The sooner cancer is found, the better the odds of successful treatment. 🔹 Peripheral Blood Holds the Key – The study highlights that simple blood tests (like cell-free DNA analysis) may outperform invasive biopsies and imaging for early signals. 🔹 Beyond Diagnosis – These tests could track survivors (like the patient mentioned) to ensure cancer doesn’t return silently. The Future? Imagine a world where routine blood work screens for cancer years before symptoms appear—turning a deadly disease into a manageable condition. This study brings us one step closer. "The answers aren’t just in high-tech scans—they’re in the peripheral blood we’ve overlooked for decades," says Dr. Soon-Shiong. "The era of precision prevention is here." Stay tuned. The fight against cancer just got smarter.

Camus

18,055 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Jimmy Dore: Groundbreaking South Korean Study Reveals Alarming Link Between COVID Vaccines and Cancer A massive new study from South Korea, utilizing the national health insurance database of over 8.4 million people, has uncovered a deeply disturbing trend. The research, which tracked patients from 2021-2023, found a statistically significant increase in cancer risk among the vaccinated population. The data paints a devastating picture: - 27% higher risk of overall cancer. - 53% higher risk of lung cancer. - 69% higher risk of prostate cancer. - 34% higher risk of gastric cancer. - 28% higher risk of colorectal cancer. - 35% higher risk of thyroid cancer. - 20% higher risk of breast cancer. As commentator Jimmy Dore highlighted, the probability this result occurred by chance is less than one in a thousand. He points out the critical context the mainstream media refuses to cover: Why was this crucial, large-scale analysis only conducted in South Korea? Why have other nations with similar databases not released such findings? This same research group has previously published data showing vaccines linked to a 68% increase in depression and a 93% increase in sleep disorders. This is the information being systematically suppressed. The very platforms that censored open debate about vaccine efficacy, early treatment, and origins of the virus are now ignoring peer-reviewed science that contradicts the official narrative. The public is demanding answers. Why the silence?

Camus

67,977 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten