Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Current violence in Kashmir did not erupt in isolation. Credible inputs indicate that elements backed by ISI exploited the situation to trigger unrest. What began as peaceful gatherings was deliberately hijacked by anti-national elements (ANEs) who pushed Shia and Sunni youth toward coordinated stone pelting on security forces. The...

MikeLimaBravo12's profile picture

Mike Lima

5,343 subscribers

14,595 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Foreign tourists landed in Srinagar, being told by the Kangle that this is India, but when they stepped into Kashmir they realised that this place is completely different! Kashmir was nothing like India the people were different, they acted differently, they were very clean, and there was none of the filth they had experienced elsewhere in India. The Kashmiris spoke differently from the Sanghis, and looked completely different, it was almost like a different country, nothing like India. JAMMU KASHMIR IS NOT INDIA #Kashmir #JammuKashmir #IOJK
0:42

Foreign tourists landed in Srinagar, being told by the Kangle that this is India, but when they stepped into Kashmir they realised that this place is completely different! Kashmir was nothing like India the people were different, they acted differently, they were very clean, and there was none of the filth they had experienced elsewhere in India. The Kashmiris spoke differently from the Sanghis, and looked completely different, it was almost like a different country, nothing like India. JAMMU KASHMIR IS NOT INDIA #Kashmir #JammuKashmir #IOJK

کشمیری🍁مرچی

34,376 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Many predicted that the tragedy in Australia would come. Not because they were alarmists, but because the pattern was visible. When extremist ideology is repeatedly explained away, softened, and shielded from consequence, violence is no longer a question of if, but when. Warnings were issued. Signals were present. The trajectory was clear. What failed was not intelligence, but judgment. This is the final stage of cultural zoochosis: a society so conditioned to tolerate ideological danger that it mistakes restraint for wisdom and denial for stability. By the time reality forces recognition, the cost is already paid in lives. Cultural zoochosis does not prevent violence. It delays accountability until blood makes denial impossible. What happened was not unforeseeable. It was foretold, ignored, and then normalized until it detonated.
1:59

Many predicted that the tragedy in Australia would come. Not because they were alarmists, but because the pattern was visible. When extremist ideology is repeatedly explained away, softened, and shielded from consequence, violence is no longer a question of if, but when. Warnings were issued. Signals were present. The trajectory was clear. What failed was not intelligence, but judgment. This is the final stage of cultural zoochosis: a society so conditioned to tolerate ideological danger that it mistakes restraint for wisdom and denial for stability. By the time reality forces recognition, the cost is already paid in lives. Cultural zoochosis does not prevent violence. It delays accountability until blood makes denial impossible. What happened was not unforeseeable. It was foretold, ignored, and then normalized until it detonated.

Rauda Altenaiji

60,115 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Mayor Karen Bass Karen Bass says the situation in her city today is nothing like the 1992 LA riots: “There is zero comparison… I was at the epicenter when it was occurring. It was a citywide civil unrest. It was the nation's worst in terms of the most costly, the number of people died, the number of people arrested. There is no comparison. And unfortunately, that is what is being pushed, as though the city is in chaos, there's civil unrest everywhere. For most Angelenos, they're like, what city are they describing? They are definitely not describing Los Angeles.”
1:12

.Mayor Karen Bass Karen Bass says the situation in her city today is nothing like the 1992 LA riots: “There is zero comparison… I was at the epicenter when it was occurring. It was a citywide civil unrest. It was the nation's worst in terms of the most costly, the number of people died, the number of people arrested. There is no comparison. And unfortunately, that is what is being pushed, as though the city is in chaos, there's civil unrest everywhere. For most Angelenos, they're like, what city are they describing? They are definitely not describing Los Angeles.”

State of the Union

99,043 просмотров • 1 год назад

There is a clear pattern in how the so-called “murpokku” DMK ecosystem operates. Whenever a real issue is raised, the focus is systematically diverted. Instead of accountability, they manufacture narratives. What is more concerning is that many of these voices are not neutral or principled. They actively engage in targeted abuse against individuals they disagree with, often backed by power centres within the ecosystem. This is not random trolling. It is coordinated, selective, and strategic. The “murpokku” image is used as a shield to justify or mask harassment, making it far more dangerous than anonymous abuse. Because it comes with influence, amplification, and intent. This pattern needs to be called out.
6:20

There is a clear pattern in how the so-called “murpokku” DMK ecosystem operates. Whenever a real issue is raised, the focus is systematically diverted. Instead of accountability, they manufacture narratives. What is more concerning is that many of these voices are not neutral or principled. They actively engage in targeted abuse against individuals they disagree with, often backed by power centres within the ecosystem. This is not random trolling. It is coordinated, selective, and strategic. The “murpokku” image is used as a shield to justify or mask harassment, making it far more dangerous than anonymous abuse. Because it comes with influence, amplification, and intent. This pattern needs to be called out.

Sonia Arunkumar

22,655 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

They signed it. Amendment Bill No. 3 is law now, and the thing we said would happen has happened, in the quiet, procedural way these things always happen. No drama. A signature. The machinery moved exactly as it was built to move. Understand what was actually done here. This was a conversion of a term limit from a constitutional guarantee into a negotiable inconvenience. Section 328 was meant to be the lock on the door. They have shown us the lock was only ever as strong as the willingness of the people holding the keys to respect it. There will be those who tell you this is legal. They will be technically correct and entirely beside the point. Legality is not the same as legitimacy. A process can follow every step and still hollow out the thing it claims to protect. The Constitution was amended by the exact people the Constitution was written to restrain. That is not the rule of law. That is the rule of whoever holds the pen. I want to be careful about despair, because despair is the goal. A population that believes nothing can change is a population that has agreed to be governed without consent. So let me say the useful thing instead of the bitter one. Constitutions are not defended in the moment they are broken. They are defended in the long years afterward, by people who refuse to accept that the breaking was normal. The record matters. Who voted. Who signed. Who stayed silent. Who said, plainly and for the record, that this was wrong. History is not written by the people who hold the pen today. It is written by the people who kept count. Keep count.
2:16

They signed it. Amendment Bill No. 3 is law now, and the thing we said would happen has happened, in the quiet, procedural way these things always happen. No drama. A signature. The machinery moved exactly as it was built to move. Understand what was actually done here. This was a conversion of a term limit from a constitutional guarantee into a negotiable inconvenience. Section 328 was meant to be the lock on the door. They have shown us the lock was only ever as strong as the willingness of the people holding the keys to respect it. There will be those who tell you this is legal. They will be technically correct and entirely beside the point. Legality is not the same as legitimacy. A process can follow every step and still hollow out the thing it claims to protect. The Constitution was amended by the exact people the Constitution was written to restrain. That is not the rule of law. That is the rule of whoever holds the pen. I want to be careful about despair, because despair is the goal. A population that believes nothing can change is a population that has agreed to be governed without consent. So let me say the useful thing instead of the bitter one. Constitutions are not defended in the moment they are broken. They are defended in the long years afterward, by people who refuse to accept that the breaking was normal. The record matters. Who voted. Who signed. Who stayed silent. Who said, plainly and for the record, that this was wrong. History is not written by the people who hold the pen today. It is written by the people who kept count. Keep count.

Tawonga Kurewa

10,243 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#ManipurViolence #Kuki_Lives_Matter Rubber bullets for the majority Meitei community and live bullets for the minority Kuki community—where is the law, where is justice? An innocent Kuki civilian, who was part of a peaceful protest in KMC Kuki Village, was shot dead by central forces. This tragedy highlights the extreme and disproportionate force used against its own citizens in a democratic country like India. Such actions against peaceful protesters, and the killing of an innocent civilian, deepen divisions and erode trust in the government. In a democracy, the law should protect all its citizens equally, yet this selective violence shows a blatant disregard for justice and human rights. Where is the accountability for this senseless loss of life? Where is the commitment to equality under the law? गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India SpearCorps.IndianArmy President of India PMO India Vishwajeet Singh Tribal Army
0:23

#ManipurViolence #Kuki_Lives_Matter Rubber bullets for the majority Meitei community and live bullets for the minority Kuki community—where is the law, where is justice? An innocent Kuki civilian, who was part of a peaceful protest in KMC Kuki Village, was shot dead by central forces. This tragedy highlights the extreme and disproportionate force used against its own citizens in a democratic country like India. Such actions against peaceful protesters, and the killing of an innocent civilian, deepen divisions and erode trust in the government. In a democracy, the law should protect all its citizens equally, yet this selective violence shows a blatant disregard for justice and human rights. Where is the accountability for this senseless loss of life? Where is the commitment to equality under the law? गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India SpearCorps.IndianArmy President of India PMO India Vishwajeet Singh Tribal Army

Official KSO Shillong

10,573 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Leh, Ladakh | On violent protests, Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council CEO Tashi Gyalson says, "... Innocent people who had come for a peaceful protest, somehow the crowd got mobilised, and suddenly the violence started... The ongoing hunger strike was quite peaceful initially and it was for a larger demand. The people of Ladakh were a little concerned but there wasn't anything to worry about as the government was holding talks from time to time and finding a solution to the issue and had also given assurances that Ladakh would receive constitutional safeguards. Despite this, some narratives began circulating that the government isn't serious about talks and will not take action on constitutional safeguards... Some provocative people started making statements... But we never anticipated it. But on the 24th, such an incident occurred, which is unfortunate, and I strongly condemn it... We have requested the LG that there should be a thorough investigation into this. There should be transparency and accountability... When violence broke out, there was a lot of strictness from the police, and the result was this: four young people lost their lives, and many others were injured... There should be accountability for all the violence... There should be accountability for the excessive use of force to control the violence..." (26.09)
4:45

#WATCH | Leh, Ladakh | On violent protests, Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council CEO Tashi Gyalson says, "... Innocent people who had come for a peaceful protest, somehow the crowd got mobilised, and suddenly the violence started... The ongoing hunger strike was quite peaceful initially and it was for a larger demand. The people of Ladakh were a little concerned but there wasn't anything to worry about as the government was holding talks from time to time and finding a solution to the issue and had also given assurances that Ladakh would receive constitutional safeguards. Despite this, some narratives began circulating that the government isn't serious about talks and will not take action on constitutional safeguards... Some provocative people started making statements... But we never anticipated it. But on the 24th, such an incident occurred, which is unfortunate, and I strongly condemn it... We have requested the LG that there should be a thorough investigation into this. There should be transparency and accountability... When violence broke out, there was a lot of strictness from the police, and the result was this: four young people lost their lives, and many others were injured... There should be accountability for all the violence... There should be accountability for the excessive use of force to control the violence..." (26.09)

ANI

37,207 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Zack Polanski, "The holocaust is in my families DNA" "The idea of zionism initially was to make sure there was a peaceful place for the Jewish people right across Europe" "When the idea of zionism was created it was about making sure there was a peaceful place for people to live" "I think the version of zionism that Netanyahu puts forward is racist, it clearly involves the extermination of the Palestinian people" "I wouldn't know what you meant by the term zionism, and I say that as a Jewish person" "Where zionism is now is very different to its initial incarnation" "Netanyahu talks about from the river to the sea, casting out the Palestinians" "We're seeing the extermination of the Palestinian people on a daily basis" "If that's your definition of zionism, then that is clearly racist"
1:52

Zack Polanski, "The holocaust is in my families DNA" "The idea of zionism initially was to make sure there was a peaceful place for the Jewish people right across Europe" "When the idea of zionism was created it was about making sure there was a peaceful place for people to live" "I think the version of zionism that Netanyahu puts forward is racist, it clearly involves the extermination of the Palestinian people" "I wouldn't know what you meant by the term zionism, and I say that as a Jewish person" "Where zionism is now is very different to its initial incarnation" "Netanyahu talks about from the river to the sea, casting out the Palestinians" "We're seeing the extermination of the Palestinian people on a daily basis" "If that's your definition of zionism, then that is clearly racist"

Farrukh

60,120 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Yazidis are really starting to annoy me. To begin with, the people who liberated you, protected your honor, and welcomed you were the Kurds. Instead of thanking them, you belittle them?! This Yazidi claims that there is no Kurdish language and that it is actually the Êzdikî language. He also says that the original Kurds were Yazidis because the religion of the Kurds before Islam was Yazidism. (This narrative was promoted by the PKK.) He also claims that “we are older than the Kurds,” which is a lie. First, it is called the Kurdish language, and the Kurds have been mentioned for thousands of years, whereas the idea of a Yazidi nationality was established by the PKK in 2014 after what they call the “liberation.” No historical book has ever described the Yazidis as a nationality, and there was no one in the world a hundred years ago whose ethnicity was “Yazidi.” Second, the religion of the Kurds before Islam was Zoroastrianism, Yazdanism, or Christianity. There was no such thing as a religion called Yazidism at that time. Third, the Yazidi religion is originally a religion that deviated from Islam. They are followers of Adi ibn Musafir, the Arab Sunni Umayyad, who was praised by Ibn Taymiyyah. The tomb of Adi (Sheikh Adi) is located in Lalish today, and the Yazidis worship it. Fourth, when a Kurd calls you Kurds, it is because he loves you and sympathizes with you because of what happened to you. Otherwise, your entire sect is of no benefit to the Kurds. Finally, Sinjar is Kurdish and will remain Kurdish. People of other national identities will be expelled from it. And let me remind you that the backbone of Kurdish nationalism has always been, and still is, the Sunni Kurds, who are deeply devoted to the Kurdish nation.
0:53

The Yazidis are really starting to annoy me. To begin with, the people who liberated you, protected your honor, and welcomed you were the Kurds. Instead of thanking them, you belittle them?! This Yazidi claims that there is no Kurdish language and that it is actually the Êzdikî language. He also says that the original Kurds were Yazidis because the religion of the Kurds before Islam was Yazidism. (This narrative was promoted by the PKK.) He also claims that “we are older than the Kurds,” which is a lie. First, it is called the Kurdish language, and the Kurds have been mentioned for thousands of years, whereas the idea of a Yazidi nationality was established by the PKK in 2014 after what they call the “liberation.” No historical book has ever described the Yazidis as a nationality, and there was no one in the world a hundred years ago whose ethnicity was “Yazidi.” Second, the religion of the Kurds before Islam was Zoroastrianism, Yazdanism, or Christianity. There was no such thing as a religion called Yazidism at that time. Third, the Yazidi religion is originally a religion that deviated from Islam. They are followers of Adi ibn Musafir, the Arab Sunni Umayyad, who was praised by Ibn Taymiyyah. The tomb of Adi (Sheikh Adi) is located in Lalish today, and the Yazidis worship it. Fourth, when a Kurd calls you Kurds, it is because he loves you and sympathizes with you because of what happened to you. Otherwise, your entire sect is of no benefit to the Kurds. Finally, Sinjar is Kurdish and will remain Kurdish. People of other national identities will be expelled from it. And let me remind you that the backbone of Kurdish nationalism has always been, and still is, the Sunni Kurds, who are deeply devoted to the Kurdish nation.

لوند ⛰️

22,605 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Dharmendra Pradhan resigning will be the first step in accountability, the government will prove that it is of the people, for the people and by the people and is sensitive to what the people expect the government to do. There is a timing for announcing strict measures, however that time has really gone- it should have come earlier and not now when there is such immense build up of students anger.
5:33

Dharmendra Pradhan resigning will be the first step in accountability, the government will prove that it is of the people, for the people and by the people and is sensitive to what the people expect the government to do. There is a timing for announcing strict measures, however that time has really gone- it should have come earlier and not now when there is such immense build up of students anger.

Priyanka Chaturvedi🇮🇳

30,301 просмотров • 28 дней назад

For every controversy, Meta’s default defence seems to be the same: “It was a technical glitch.” But a former Meta executive turned whistle-blower has punctured that narrative. Algorithms don’t create themselves. They are designed by people, trained on human choices, and operate within rules set by the company. Meta decides what gets amplified, what gets suppressed, and the guidelines that govern those decisions. When political content is selectively boosted or throttled, dismissing it as a mere “technical glitch” is no longer a credible explanation. It raises fundamental questions about accountability, transparency, and who really controls the digital public square.
6:15

For every controversy, Meta’s default defence seems to be the same: “It was a technical glitch.” But a former Meta executive turned whistle-blower has punctured that narrative. Algorithms don’t create themselves. They are designed by people, trained on human choices, and operate within rules set by the company. Meta decides what gets amplified, what gets suppressed, and the guidelines that govern those decisions. When political content is selectively boosted or throttled, dismissing it as a mere “technical glitch” is no longer a credible explanation. It raises fundamental questions about accountability, transparency, and who really controls the digital public square.

Amit Malviya

28,521 просмотров • 15 дней назад

🚨 THIS ISN’T COMPASSION — IT’S DENIAL The naivety on display is staggering. In the aftermath of mass violence, a British Member of Parliament still reaches for the same exhausted refrain: “Diversity is our strength.” As if slogans are a substitute for security. As if sentiment can override reality. “We should detoxify the way we think of people who aren’t like us,” we’re told — while communities bury their dead. This is not unity. It is avoidance. Coming together is meaningless if it requires us to look away from patterns, silence hard questions, and pretend ideology plays no role in real-world violence. Strength is not found in repeating mantras. It is found in honesty, boundaries, and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths. When leaders respond to tragedy with platitudes instead of clarity, they are not healing society — they are leaving it exposed. And the cost of that denial is paid by ordinary people.
1:39

🚨 THIS ISN’T COMPASSION — IT’S DENIAL The naivety on display is staggering. In the aftermath of mass violence, a British Member of Parliament still reaches for the same exhausted refrain: “Diversity is our strength.” As if slogans are a substitute for security. As if sentiment can override reality. “We should detoxify the way we think of people who aren’t like us,” we’re told — while communities bury their dead. This is not unity. It is avoidance. Coming together is meaningless if it requires us to look away from patterns, silence hard questions, and pretend ideology plays no role in real-world violence. Strength is not found in repeating mantras. It is found in honesty, boundaries, and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths. When leaders respond to tragedy with platitudes instead of clarity, they are not healing society — they are leaving it exposed. And the cost of that denial is paid by ordinary people.

Jim Ferguson

15,416 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

#WATCH | On vandalisation by a mob at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata Police Commissioner, Vineet Goyal says, "...If you say it is a failure of assessment, then yes, you can call it a failure of assessment...This entire protest was supposed to have been a very peaceful protest. That is my understanding... There was no such intelligence... We also make an assessment on the basis of whatever is available... We deploy our resources and try to see that law and order is maintained. So the assessment failure is not the first time it has happened, whether in Kolkata or elsewhere. They do happen at times...There is adequate security...And we are committed to it..."
3:20

#WATCH | On vandalisation by a mob at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata Police Commissioner, Vineet Goyal says, "...If you say it is a failure of assessment, then yes, you can call it a failure of assessment...This entire protest was supposed to have been a very peaceful protest. That is my understanding... There was no such intelligence... We also make an assessment on the basis of whatever is available... We deploy our resources and try to see that law and order is maintained. So the assessment failure is not the first time it has happened, whether in Kolkata or elsewhere. They do happen at times...There is adequate security...And we are committed to it..."

ANI

161,046 просмотров • 2 лет назад

#WATCH | Delhi | Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It was a very good briefing with the Foreign Secretary on all the issues to deal with the Iran war that were not covered in the earlier briefing when he was himself not present... 17 members attended, and all of them had very serious questions for the Foreign Secretary... Everything was discussed, our relationship with every single significant country in the region and beyond, larger questions of strategy, energy security, geopolitics, and Pakistan's role... There is a certain appreciation of this ongoing dialogue between the Foreign Ministry and the Committee. The Committee has felt very much that we are taken into confidence in the right sort of way, and in turn, want to be constructive in our criticisms, questions and challenges to the government for ourselves as parliamentarians, to represent the voice of the people of India. It has been a good exercise, but we all agree that this is not something we need to talk about publicly."
2:11

#WATCH | Delhi | Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It was a very good briefing with the Foreign Secretary on all the issues to deal with the Iran war that were not covered in the earlier briefing when he was himself not present... 17 members attended, and all of them had very serious questions for the Foreign Secretary... Everything was discussed, our relationship with every single significant country in the region and beyond, larger questions of strategy, energy security, geopolitics, and Pakistan's role... There is a certain appreciation of this ongoing dialogue between the Foreign Ministry and the Committee. The Committee has felt very much that we are taken into confidence in the right sort of way, and in turn, want to be constructive in our criticisms, questions and challenges to the government for ourselves as parliamentarians, to represent the voice of the people of India. It has been a good exercise, but we all agree that this is not something we need to talk about publicly."

ANI

61,853 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

There is a moment in every man's life where the question is not what is strategic, not what is convenient, not what is politically comfortable, the question is simply, what is right and what is wrong. These sources did not step forward for fame. They stepped forward because they believed in something greater than themselves. They infiltrated one of the most brutal regimes in the Western Hemisphere. Their families — including children — are now being hunted because they chose to stand on the right side of history. Those are real people, in real danger, right now. The United States of America asked these men and women to trust us. They did and the silence they have received in return is not a bureaucratic oversight. It is a moral failure. Plain and simple. I have spent my life in service to this country. I know what we ask of people who work in the shadows. I know the weight of that ask and I know that when a nation stops honoring its word to the people who sacrificed the most, it has lost something far more valuable than any intelligence asset. This is not complicated. These people did right by us. Now we do right by them.
0:27

There is a moment in every man's life where the question is not what is strategic, not what is convenient, not what is politically comfortable, the question is simply, what is right and what is wrong. These sources did not step forward for fame. They stepped forward because they believed in something greater than themselves. They infiltrated one of the most brutal regimes in the Western Hemisphere. Their families — including children — are now being hunted because they chose to stand on the right side of history. Those are real people, in real danger, right now. The United States of America asked these men and women to trust us. They did and the silence they have received in return is not a bureaucratic oversight. It is a moral failure. Plain and simple. I have spent my life in service to this country. I know what we ask of people who work in the shadows. I know the weight of that ask and I know that when a nation stops honoring its word to the people who sacrificed the most, it has lost something far more valuable than any intelligence asset. This is not complicated. These people did right by us. Now we do right by them.

General Mike Flynn

61,706 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Slavery Was Not Abolished In The US. It Was Rebranded The U.S. calls itself the land of the free and a defender of human rights, but its prison system tells a very different story. While America celebrates the 13th Amendment as the official end of slavery, what is happening inside its prisons shows that slavery did not actually end. It was repackaged and reshaped through a loophole in the same law that claims to abolish it. What you see in places like the so-called Angola prison makes that contradiction clear. The same country that speaks about global freedom and claims to police human rights abuses is still profiting from forced labor within its own system, backed and protected by its own laws. That is the reality. For Africans and people across the Global South, this is something to pay attention to. It shows that the image America presents to the world is not the full story, and it raises serious questions about how seriously its claims on human rights should be taken.
4:55

Slavery Was Not Abolished In The US. It Was Rebranded The U.S. calls itself the land of the free and a defender of human rights, but its prison system tells a very different story. While America celebrates the 13th Amendment as the official end of slavery, what is happening inside its prisons shows that slavery did not actually end. It was repackaged and reshaped through a loophole in the same law that claims to abolish it. What you see in places like the so-called Angola prison makes that contradiction clear. The same country that speaks about global freedom and claims to police human rights abuses is still profiting from forced labor within its own system, backed and protected by its own laws. That is the reality. For Africans and people across the Global South, this is something to pay attention to. It shows that the image America presents to the world is not the full story, and it raises serious questions about how seriously its claims on human rights should be taken.

The Spearhead

37,170 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is: Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard: DNI Tulsi Gabbard “So yes, this is a treasonous conspiracy that subverts the will of the American people. Because if you look at their actions — they manufactured a hoax. They manufactured these lies and published them as though they were true.” “In this system, there is meant to be a peaceful transition of power. What we saw play out here was that President Trump was elected by the American people in 2016 — shocking most people in the United States. Apparently, even Russia and Putin didn’t think he would win. Instead of accepting that this was the will of the people, what we saw was Barack Hussein Obama convening his national security team and concocting this contrived false narrative through the production of the Intelligence Community Assessment in January 2017 — with the specific intent of overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”
1:44

This is: Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard: DNI Tulsi Gabbard “So yes, this is a treasonous conspiracy that subverts the will of the American people. Because if you look at their actions — they manufactured a hoax. They manufactured these lies and published them as though they were true.” “In this system, there is meant to be a peaceful transition of power. What we saw play out here was that President Trump was elected by the American people in 2016 — shocking most people in the United States. Apparently, even Russia and Putin didn’t think he would win. Instead of accepting that this was the will of the people, what we saw was Barack Hussein Obama convening his national security team and concocting this contrived false narrative through the production of the Intelligence Community Assessment in January 2017 — with the specific intent of overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

28,800 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад