Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

David Friedberg: Government Spending is Making Everything More Expensive… and Driving America Toward Socialism david friedberg: “California's got tens of billions of dollars it spent on this stupid f**king railway that goes nowhere, where there's no f**king tracks…” David Sacks: “And there's no political will to even stop that....

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

591,109 subscribers

89,354 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”
1:46

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”

The All-In Podcast

189,084 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in Government should not be a party issue. By allowing the Republicans to say 'We're for efficient government,' it implies that the Democrats are the opposite of that saying, 'We're for *inefficient government.' If the Democrats want to win this they can take this message and say we're for *more* efficient government and the way we're going to do it is by getting rid of regulatory capture, deals, etc. There's an opportunity for the Democrats to stand up and take the country in the direction that we *all* as Americans need it to go to, which is to have a sustainable federal Government. That's going to require some degree of fiscal conservatism and action, but they can take a different point of view on how they do it and have core beliefs around that." david friedberg The All-In Podcast
1:14

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in Government should not be a party issue. By allowing the Republicans to say 'We're for efficient government,' it implies that the Democrats are the opposite of that saying, 'We're for *inefficient government.' If the Democrats want to win this they can take this message and say we're for *more* efficient government and the way we're going to do it is by getting rid of regulatory capture, deals, etc. There's an opportunity for the Democrats to stand up and take the country in the direction that we *all* as Americans need it to go to, which is to have a sustainable federal Government. That's going to require some degree of fiscal conservatism and action, but they can take a different point of view on how they do it and have core beliefs around that." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

93,886 просмотров • 1 год назад

One of John McAfee's final messages to the world: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."
2:00

One of John McAfee's final messages to the world: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."

Red Pill Dispenser

516,470 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨Should the US create a Sovereign Wealth Fund? Chamath and Friedberg discuss Chamath: “I think that we should start a sovereign wealth fund right now.” “The great news is that these Trump tariff deals come with huge amounts of capital that these other countries have committed to spending inside the United States.” “We've exceeded $1T of inbound capital on the investment side. We get 90% of the upside.” “A lot of that capital should be the seed capital for a sovereign wealth fund.” Friedberg: “The concern I have is anytime we create a new income stream at the federal government, or we have some sort of growing asset that you mark up on the book, someone tends to invest ahead of the curve on that.” “Meaning someone takes that and they're like, ‘Oh, great, I can spend more now.’ I mean, we even saw this in California (with) Gavin Newsom and the budget skyrocketed as the income went up.” “Rather than take the surplus and book it for a rainy day, they went and spent ahead of it, and then all of a sudden they had a huge deficit.” “Which is what happened with Social Security is, it's like, okay, all these people are providing this income every year to the federal government, which they're supposed to be paying into their Social Security Trust Fund, which is gonna go bankrupt sometime between 2030 and 2033.” “But then what happened is we raided the coffers, we took all that money, and we started spending it on random new programs.” “And the problem is, by giving the government more assets, by giving the government more income, we set ourselves up for a circumstance where the federal government, the Congress says, ‘Great, we got more money to spend. Let's do X, Y, and Z program and let's do this. Let's build a high speed train. Let's do this. These are all good for American people.’” “And all of a sudden, you don't actually solve any real problems. And this is why my argument is that we should use it to fill the hole that we have, for example, in Social Security.” “And that needs to become an asset that's strictly used as an offset on Social Security, because if you don't put it in that box, it just becomes another spending mechanism.”
1:38

🚨Should the US create a Sovereign Wealth Fund? Chamath and Friedberg discuss Chamath: “I think that we should start a sovereign wealth fund right now.” “The great news is that these Trump tariff deals come with huge amounts of capital that these other countries have committed to spending inside the United States.” “We've exceeded $1T of inbound capital on the investment side. We get 90% of the upside.” “A lot of that capital should be the seed capital for a sovereign wealth fund.” Friedberg: “The concern I have is anytime we create a new income stream at the federal government, or we have some sort of growing asset that you mark up on the book, someone tends to invest ahead of the curve on that.” “Meaning someone takes that and they're like, ‘Oh, great, I can spend more now.’ I mean, we even saw this in California (with) Gavin Newsom and the budget skyrocketed as the income went up.” “Rather than take the surplus and book it for a rainy day, they went and spent ahead of it, and then all of a sudden they had a huge deficit.” “Which is what happened with Social Security is, it's like, okay, all these people are providing this income every year to the federal government, which they're supposed to be paying into their Social Security Trust Fund, which is gonna go bankrupt sometime between 2030 and 2033.” “But then what happened is we raided the coffers, we took all that money, and we started spending it on random new programs.” “And the problem is, by giving the government more assets, by giving the government more income, we set ourselves up for a circumstance where the federal government, the Congress says, ‘Great, we got more money to spend. Let's do X, Y, and Z program and let's do this. Let's build a high speed train. Let's do this. These are all good for American people.’” “And all of a sudden, you don't actually solve any real problems. And this is why my argument is that we should use it to fill the hole that we have, for example, in Social Security.” “And that needs to become an asset that's strictly used as an offset on Social Security, because if you don't put it in that box, it just becomes another spending mechanism.”

The All-In Podcast

44,452 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk: All government spending is taxation. “The reality is that all government spending is taxation. People will think, well, government spending and taxation are somehow separate, but they're not. All government spending is taxation because the deficit is what results in inflation. And inflation is a de facto tax because it causes all prices to rise, and people trying to just live their lives have a lot of difficulty. But inflation, throughout history, has been used as a pernicious tax because it's like one degree removed, so people don't feel it directly. And then the politicians will try to blame it on something else. But it's all about government spending. Government spending is what drives inflation. So the key is we've got to reduce the government spending and if we don't, we're going to go bankrupt as a country. End of story.” Town Hall Harrisburg, October 19, 2024
0:57

Elon Musk: All government spending is taxation. “The reality is that all government spending is taxation. People will think, well, government spending and taxation are somehow separate, but they're not. All government spending is taxation because the deficit is what results in inflation. And inflation is a de facto tax because it causes all prices to rise, and people trying to just live their lives have a lot of difficulty. But inflation, throughout history, has been used as a pernicious tax because it's like one degree removed, so people don't feel it directly. And then the politicians will try to blame it on something else. But it's all about government spending. Government spending is what drives inflation. So the key is we've got to reduce the government spending and if we don't, we're going to go bankrupt as a country. End of story.” Town Hall Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

17,109 просмотров • 1 год назад

.david friedberg: “We are now at a moment where we are saying there is no longer private property in the United States. This is one of the foundational rights that the founders of the United States tried to create: a distinction between these other nations that everyone flees from, where a monarchy or a totalitarian government or some communist system says everyone owns everything together, or some small number of people own and control everything. And that’s what this always comes down to. Whether it’s a socialist state or a communist state or a monarchy or some other totalitarian regime, there’s a small number of people that own and control everything. And that is the brink that we’re on. Because they are trying to say, for the first time ever, there is no longer private property in the United States. That if the government can say everything that you’ve already paid your income tax on, and then you’ve bought and you now own, the government can take a piece of it every year based on the vote and the budgetary needs of an irresponsible fiscal legislature. We’ve lost it all. And that’s where we are. And we see this just passed in Illinois. People think it’s just crypto, just like they think that billionaire tax is just billionaires. But anytime the government can take your private property after you’ve paid your taxes, bought something, and put it in your garage, we are done for. That is when the politburo has unlimited capacity to tax and take and do what they want. That’s the moment we’re at.”
1:32

.david friedberg: “We are now at a moment where we are saying there is no longer private property in the United States. This is one of the foundational rights that the founders of the United States tried to create: a distinction between these other nations that everyone flees from, where a monarchy or a totalitarian government or some communist system says everyone owns everything together, or some small number of people own and control everything. And that’s what this always comes down to. Whether it’s a socialist state or a communist state or a monarchy or some other totalitarian regime, there’s a small number of people that own and control everything. And that is the brink that we’re on. Because they are trying to say, for the first time ever, there is no longer private property in the United States. That if the government can say everything that you’ve already paid your income tax on, and then you’ve bought and you now own, the government can take a piece of it every year based on the vote and the budgetary needs of an irresponsible fiscal legislature. We’ve lost it all. And that’s where we are. And we see this just passed in Illinois. People think it’s just crypto, just like they think that billionaire tax is just billionaires. But anytime the government can take your private property after you’ve paid your taxes, bought something, and put it in your garage, we are done for. That is when the politburo has unlimited capacity to tax and take and do what they want. That’s the moment we’re at.”

Arjun Khemani

72,169 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨David Friedberg: "Socialism will sweep over this nation" "My prediction will ring truer than any of us hope." "Socialism will sweep over this nation, I fear." "It’s a cancer and it's going to be worse than what we saw with woke stuff." "People are stagnant in wage growth." "No one in the United States, including wealthy people, haven’t taken significant notice of the increased cost of groceries, and in the increased cost of buying home goods." "Everyone’s rent goes up every year. There was this TikTok rant that went viral this week — 'Why does my rent go up every year? My salary doesn’t go up.'" "We're in this really difficult moment because of what Ben pointed out, which is that we've basically funded the government to do everything for us, and by my calculation from last year, I think nearly half of Americans are employed directly or indirectly by the government at this point." ”Because of that, and the inefficiency of government allocation of capital, everything inflates in cost and we're entering this era where some people make the joke that the train has left the station.”
0:52

🚨David Friedberg: "Socialism will sweep over this nation" "My prediction will ring truer than any of us hope." "Socialism will sweep over this nation, I fear." "It’s a cancer and it's going to be worse than what we saw with woke stuff." "People are stagnant in wage growth." "No one in the United States, including wealthy people, haven’t taken significant notice of the increased cost of groceries, and in the increased cost of buying home goods." "Everyone’s rent goes up every year. There was this TikTok rant that went viral this week — 'Why does my rent go up every year? My salary doesn’t go up.'" "We're in this really difficult moment because of what Ben pointed out, which is that we've basically funded the government to do everything for us, and by my calculation from last year, I think nearly half of Americans are employed directly or indirectly by the government at this point." ”Because of that, and the inefficiency of government allocation of capital, everything inflates in cost and we're entering this era where some people make the joke that the train has left the station.”

The All-In Podcast

329,295 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Friedberg Breaks Down Zohran Mamdani's Win in NYC: The College Debt Crisis Has Led Young People to Socialism "It's really a revolution against the system that brought them to this moment." "Because the promise that we gave in America, the American Dream, was if you go to college, you will graduate, you will have income, you will have stability, you'll be able to buy a home." "And what we did is we increased the government's role in making that dream possible, and in doing so, we created effectively a system where we gave unrestricted access to capital, which inflated the cost of education." " People could go to school like Zohran and major in African studies and graduate with $200-300K of debt and then never get a job. The guy has not had a real job. And this is the truth for 32 million young Americans." " They all have what is called negative capital. They have debt and they will never be able to get out of that cycle." "So where do you turn in that moment? You don't go turn to corporations to solve your problems. You don't go turn to your friends and your siblings and your family, they're not gonna bail you out." "You turn to the voting booth, and you hear a guy like Zohran show up and say, 'There can be a better path forward.' The better path forward is the government can and should do more to help." "And in doing more to help, we will increase government, we will tax the rich, we will tax the corporations. We will take all of that capital and we will redistribute it in the form of services and checks and support for all of the people that find themselves unable to take care of themselves." "And this becomes a tipping point when the majority of the voter base ends up in that situation where they're that deeply in need, where they have negative capital." "And that is the situation America finds itself in today."
2:56

David Friedberg Breaks Down Zohran Mamdani's Win in NYC: The College Debt Crisis Has Led Young People to Socialism "It's really a revolution against the system that brought them to this moment." "Because the promise that we gave in America, the American Dream, was if you go to college, you will graduate, you will have income, you will have stability, you'll be able to buy a home." "And what we did is we increased the government's role in making that dream possible, and in doing so, we created effectively a system where we gave unrestricted access to capital, which inflated the cost of education." " People could go to school like Zohran and major in African studies and graduate with $200-300K of debt and then never get a job. The guy has not had a real job. And this is the truth for 32 million young Americans." " They all have what is called negative capital. They have debt and they will never be able to get out of that cycle." "So where do you turn in that moment? You don't go turn to corporations to solve your problems. You don't go turn to your friends and your siblings and your family, they're not gonna bail you out." "You turn to the voting booth, and you hear a guy like Zohran show up and say, 'There can be a better path forward.' The better path forward is the government can and should do more to help." "And in doing more to help, we will increase government, we will tax the rich, we will tax the corporations. We will take all of that capital and we will redistribute it in the form of services and checks and support for all of the people that find themselves unable to take care of themselves." "And this becomes a tipping point when the majority of the voter base ends up in that situation where they're that deeply in need, where they have negative capital." "And that is the situation America finds itself in today."

The All-In Podcast

470,908 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."
1:10

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

The All-In Podcast

260,998 просмотров • 1 год назад

Yesterday’s increase in Interest rates is not going to do anything to fix the underlying structural imbalances in our economy. It is not going to help build one oil refinery or find a new discovery oil. The reason we have persistent inflation in Australia is because our government is running high immigration, high spending programs alongside chronic underinvestment in infrastructure and manufacturing after decades of privatisation. It is completely absurd that the Australian people are now going to be punished with higher interest rates alongside higher fuel costs. The higher fuel costs is in-itself going to dampen demand by increasing the cost of living so why pour fuel on the fire by increasing the cost of living even more. We are in this mess because of government spending not because Australians are spending too much just to survive. Manipulating interest rates is only dealing with the symptom not the cause. Notwithstanding we can’t solve inflation in the next 30 days, Australia needs to start building more infrastructure and factories and training our children the trades needed to do it. This will increase the supply of essential goods to bring inflation down. People First is the only party with the policies that will do this. We will create an infrastructure bank to fund the infrastructure free from foreign debt and we will bring back the military apprenticeship scheme to train our children how to build and maintain the infrastructure and manufacturing plants. Sign up today at
1:52

Yesterday’s increase in Interest rates is not going to do anything to fix the underlying structural imbalances in our economy. It is not going to help build one oil refinery or find a new discovery oil. The reason we have persistent inflation in Australia is because our government is running high immigration, high spending programs alongside chronic underinvestment in infrastructure and manufacturing after decades of privatisation. It is completely absurd that the Australian people are now going to be punished with higher interest rates alongside higher fuel costs. The higher fuel costs is in-itself going to dampen demand by increasing the cost of living so why pour fuel on the fire by increasing the cost of living even more. We are in this mess because of government spending not because Australians are spending too much just to survive. Manipulating interest rates is only dealing with the symptom not the cause. Notwithstanding we can’t solve inflation in the next 30 days, Australia needs to start building more infrastructure and factories and training our children the trades needed to do it. This will increase the supply of essential goods to bring inflation down. People First is the only party with the policies that will do this. We will create an infrastructure bank to fund the infrastructure free from foreign debt and we will bring back the military apprenticeship scheme to train our children how to build and maintain the infrastructure and manufacturing plants. Sign up today at

Gerard Rennick

28,618 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

If you confiscated all the wealth of all the billionaires in the country--and let's just pretend you could actually liquidate it for that much--you would cover about ONE YEAR of federal government spending. As Dave Smith points out in his reply to this clip, we're not taxing our way out of this, and the idea that we ever had a Friedmanite government at any point is simply ahistorical. "Which year did Ronald Reagan cut spending? Oh, wait, it increased EVERY year?" We aren't going to fix this country with Hamiltonian economics. We need to embrace a Misesian/Rothbardian understanding of economics, and until the right understands that, they're going to keep losing to the left in the long run because they are fundamentally thinking of government and economics on the left's terms.
7:24

If you confiscated all the wealth of all the billionaires in the country--and let's just pretend you could actually liquidate it for that much--you would cover about ONE YEAR of federal government spending. As Dave Smith points out in his reply to this clip, we're not taxing our way out of this, and the idea that we ever had a Friedmanite government at any point is simply ahistorical. "Which year did Ronald Reagan cut spending? Oh, wait, it increased EVERY year?" We aren't going to fix this country with Hamiltonian economics. We need to embrace a Misesian/Rothbardian understanding of economics, and until the right understands that, they're going to keep losing to the left in the long run because they are fundamentally thinking of government and economics on the left's terms.

Captain Ⓐncapistan

51,918 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just WENT OFF on Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries "Initially they said that they wanted to shut down the government because Donald Trump was a dictator. OK, that's absurd. Then they said they wanted to shut down the government because they wanted hundreds of billions of dollars for healthcare benefits for illegal aliens! That, of course, is also absurd!" "And now they're saying they just want to work on ensuring that Americans have low-cost healthcare. Well, I agree with them. Of course we all want to ensure that Americans have low-cost healthcare. So let's work together on that." "You don't shut the government down. You don't take the government as a HOSTAGE because you want to engage in a negotiation about health care costs. Let's do that negotiation, but let's do it in the context of actually opening the government and ensuring those essential services are actually provided to the American people."
0:43

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just WENT OFF on Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries "Initially they said that they wanted to shut down the government because Donald Trump was a dictator. OK, that's absurd. Then they said they wanted to shut down the government because they wanted hundreds of billions of dollars for healthcare benefits for illegal aliens! That, of course, is also absurd!" "And now they're saying they just want to work on ensuring that Americans have low-cost healthcare. Well, I agree with them. Of course we all want to ensure that Americans have low-cost healthcare. So let's work together on that." "You don't shut the government down. You don't take the government as a HOSTAGE because you want to engage in a negotiation about health care costs. Let's do that negotiation, but let's do it in the context of actually opening the government and ensuring those essential services are actually provided to the American people."

Eric Daugherty

948,567 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨David Sacks warns that government created the cost-of-living crisis — and socialist policies will only drive prices even higher. “If you look at where the most inflation has occurred, it’s always in those sectors of the economy that the government’s most involved.” Healthcare. College. Housing. “Where the government has massive amounts of subsidies and regulation. It only seems to make the problem worse.” Meanwhile, Sacks points out that prices have fallen in highly competitive technology markets with far less government involvement. TVs, software, and cell phones. “We know that you bring prices down through vigorous competition, not through more government interference in these markets.” “Socialism causes the problem, and then groups like the DSA argue that the way to solve the problem is through more socialism.” “It’s a disease that claims to be a cure.” Government spending, subsidies, and regulation drive costs higher, then socialists use those higher costs to justify even more government control. Full episode: The All-In Podcast
2:25

🚨David Sacks warns that government created the cost-of-living crisis — and socialist policies will only drive prices even higher. “If you look at where the most inflation has occurred, it’s always in those sectors of the economy that the government’s most involved.” Healthcare. College. Housing. “Where the government has massive amounts of subsidies and regulation. It only seems to make the problem worse.” Meanwhile, Sacks points out that prices have fallen in highly competitive technology markets with far less government involvement. TVs, software, and cell phones. “We know that you bring prices down through vigorous competition, not through more government interference in these markets.” “Socialism causes the problem, and then groups like the DSA argue that the way to solve the problem is through more socialism.” “It’s a disease that claims to be a cure.” Government spending, subsidies, and regulation drive costs higher, then socialists use those higher costs to justify even more government control. Full episode: The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

63,466 просмотров • 9 дней назад

VIDEO | Congress MP Renuka Chowdhary says, “What is the compulsion or need to go on national television and claim there is no shortage of LPG, when the government is not in control at the ground level?...You cannot book a cylinder in Maharashtra. You cannot book a cylinder in Telangana. You cannot book a cylinder in Bihar. There is a waiting period of 26 to 45 days. Cylinders are being sold on the black market for Rs 3,000 to Rs 7,500 every day. People are in a state of panic. Even firewood prices have gone up. Is there no reality check in this government? They do not manufacture gas. We have a global situation. It would be perfectly reasonable to inform the country and our citizens of the situation, saying: ‘We will supply gas in a staggered manner. Do not panic. Meanwhile, these are the steps we are taking.’ But this government is not used to telling the truth. Out of compulsion, they end up spreading lies and confusing the people of the nation. It is a shame that this is how they operate. It shows that they lack both the experience and the honesty to tell the truth and to lead the country forward. There has been a failure on all fronts, and today we do not know where we stand with which country. It is a shocking state of disarray.”
1:29

VIDEO | Congress MP Renuka Chowdhary says, “What is the compulsion or need to go on national television and claim there is no shortage of LPG, when the government is not in control at the ground level?...You cannot book a cylinder in Maharashtra. You cannot book a cylinder in Telangana. You cannot book a cylinder in Bihar. There is a waiting period of 26 to 45 days. Cylinders are being sold on the black market for Rs 3,000 to Rs 7,500 every day. People are in a state of panic. Even firewood prices have gone up. Is there no reality check in this government? They do not manufacture gas. We have a global situation. It would be perfectly reasonable to inform the country and our citizens of the situation, saying: ‘We will supply gas in a staggered manner. Do not panic. Meanwhile, these are the steps we are taking.’ But this government is not used to telling the truth. Out of compulsion, they end up spreading lies and confusing the people of the nation. It is a shame that this is how they operate. It shows that they lack both the experience and the honesty to tell the truth and to lead the country forward. There has been a failure on all fronts, and today we do not know where we stand with which country. It is a shocking state of disarray.”

Press Trust of India

25,458 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This Video Is Going Crazy Viral Saying It’s American’s Constitution Obligation To “Overthrow The Government” If It Becomes Tyrannical Is The US Government Pushing Americans Too Far? “So inside the Declaration of Independence, it states that if your government is basically not doing its job, it's not protecting you, It's putting your lives at risk. K, and they're no longer working for you. Everything that's happening right now, it states that We The People have a legal obligation to overthrow the government. K, and there's a very small amount of you who support what these f****** politicians are doing right now. K, But the truth is you are no longer driving the vehicle. The government is driving the vehicle for you. You're not even in the passenger seat. You're tied up in the f****** trunk”
0:48

This Video Is Going Crazy Viral Saying It’s American’s Constitution Obligation To “Overthrow The Government” If It Becomes Tyrannical Is The US Government Pushing Americans Too Far? “So inside the Declaration of Independence, it states that if your government is basically not doing its job, it's not protecting you, It's putting your lives at risk. K, and they're no longer working for you. Everything that's happening right now, it states that We The People have a legal obligation to overthrow the government. K, and there's a very small amount of you who support what these f****** politicians are doing right now. K, But the truth is you are no longer driving the vehicle. The government is driving the vehicle for you. You're not even in the passenger seat. You're tied up in the f****** trunk”

Wall Street Apes

1,186,352 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Christy Clark "You know, one of the reasons that I'm in Asia today is because Asian countries, democracies in particular are desperate for Canadian oil and gas and energy." "We spent 10 years between 2015 and 2025 with a government that did everything it could to stop resource development in Canada." "And the world is saying to us, where are you now we when we need you." Moore "There's no excuse. Get it done. There's genuinely no opposition to him getting this done from the left." Christy Clark James Moore
2:24

Christy Clark "You know, one of the reasons that I'm in Asia today is because Asian countries, democracies in particular are desperate for Canadian oil and gas and energy." "We spent 10 years between 2015 and 2025 with a government that did everything it could to stop resource development in Canada." "And the world is saying to us, where are you now we when we need you." Moore "There's no excuse. Get it done. There's genuinely no opposition to him getting this done from the left." Christy Clark James Moore

cbcwatcher

51,843 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Mamdani on Arch/Ballroom/Club Rose Garden: My message would be that this is not what government has to be. This is not the only vision for what it looks like to have politics in this country—that is so divorced from the needs and wants of everyday people. And what we are looking to show in New York City is an alternative to what has led so many to become disenchanted with the political process. We want to show that not only can government work, but it must, and that at its core, our responsibility is to working people—to ensure that we’re doing everything to make their lives easier. That has to be what drives our actions, and for too long, government has felt more like a distraction than a fulfillment of the needs of the people who’ve been left behind by the politics of today.
1:26

Mamdani on Arch/Ballroom/Club Rose Garden: My message would be that this is not what government has to be. This is not the only vision for what it looks like to have politics in this country—that is so divorced from the needs and wants of everyday people. And what we are looking to show in New York City is an alternative to what has led so many to become disenchanted with the political process. We want to show that not only can government work, but it must, and that at its core, our responsibility is to working people—to ensure that we’re doing everything to make their lives easier. That has to be what drives our actions, and for too long, government has felt more like a distraction than a fulfillment of the needs of the people who’ve been left behind by the politics of today.

Acyn

31,743 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ELON: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS SPENDING AMERICA INTO BANKRUPTCY “The federal government is spending America into bankruptcy, which is crazy. That's really what leads to inflation, when the government spends more than it brings in, that's what causes inflation. It's just a pernicious tax. We have to radically reduce the amount of government spending so that we don't rack up a debt that is impossible to repay and drive the country to bankruptcy.” Source: Folsom, October 17, 2024
0:28

ELON: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS SPENDING AMERICA INTO BANKRUPTCY “The federal government is spending America into bankruptcy, which is crazy. That's really what leads to inflation, when the government spends more than it brings in, that's what causes inflation. It's just a pernicious tax. We have to radically reduce the amount of government spending so that we don't rack up a debt that is impossible to repay and drive the country to bankruptcy.” Source: Folsom, October 17, 2024

Mario Nawfal

83,065 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Friedberg warns: Private property is ending in America. Governor JB Pritzker just signed a new 0.2% Digital Asset Tax into Illinois’ budget. It hits crypto transactions, transfers, and custody services starting 2027. This isn’t just about crypto. Friedberg says it’s the latest sign that private property rights are under direct assault in America. You pay income taxes, buy an asset with after-tax dollars, and now the government claims the right to take a recurring cut every year based on its spending needs. The Founders created a clear distinction between America and the monarchies, socialist states, and totalitarian regimes where a small elite controls everything. Friedberg argues we’re now on the brink of abandoning that protection. david friedberg "If the government can say, everything that you've already paid your income tax on and then you've bought it and you now own, the government can take a piece of it every year based on the vote and the budgetary needs of an irresponsible fiscal legislature. We've lost it all. And that's where we are. Anytime the government can take your private property after you've paid your taxes, bought something and put it in your garage, we are done for." This started with the ‘billionaire tax,’ then moved to crypto, and it won’t stop there. It always expands. Where do we draw the line on property rights?
1:28

David Friedberg warns: Private property is ending in America. Governor JB Pritzker just signed a new 0.2% Digital Asset Tax into Illinois’ budget. It hits crypto transactions, transfers, and custody services starting 2027. This isn’t just about crypto. Friedberg says it’s the latest sign that private property rights are under direct assault in America. You pay income taxes, buy an asset with after-tax dollars, and now the government claims the right to take a recurring cut every year based on its spending needs. The Founders created a clear distinction between America and the monarchies, socialist states, and totalitarian regimes where a small elite controls everything. Friedberg argues we’re now on the brink of abandoning that protection. david friedberg "If the government can say, everything that you've already paid your income tax on and then you've bought it and you now own, the government can take a piece of it every year based on the vote and the budgetary needs of an irresponsible fiscal legislature. We've lost it all. And that's where we are. Anytime the government can take your private property after you've paid your taxes, bought something and put it in your garage, we are done for." This started with the ‘billionaire tax,’ then moved to crypto, and it won’t stop there. It always expands. Where do we draw the line on property rights?

jay plemons

68,883 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад