Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “Anthropic has a job listing for a software engineer on their website right now for $570,000 … So what Anthropic is saying is they're still trying to hire software engineers, at a very high wage, but somehow they think these jobs are going to be eliminated.”

Chief Nerd

927,870 subscribers

1,419,686 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

DAVID SACKS: “Anthropic is the fastest growing tech company at scale in history … In their lust for growth, Anthropic has done a very poor job at stopping distillation … Instead what they're saying is, ban our competitors. That's ridiculous.”

DAVID SACKS: “Anthropic is the fastest growing tech company at scale in history … In their lust for growth, Anthropic has done a very poor job at stopping distillation … Instead what they're saying is, ban our competitors. That's ridiculous.”

Chief Nerd

93,629 views • 25 days ago

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang just called the idea of AI replacing software engineers "complete nonsense" "The number of software engineers is actually increasing... if you can hire a software engineer and generate $9 trillion worth of productive work, why wouldn't you want to hire more? If that line were flat, then obviously people would hire fewer software engineers. But because the output is so incredible, people want to hire more This is going to show up in our economy somehow, soon. Useful AI has arrived"

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang just called the idea of AI replacing software engineers "complete nonsense" "The number of software engineers is actually increasing... if you can hire a software engineer and generate $9 trillion worth of productive work, why wouldn't you want to hire more? If that line were flat, then obviously people would hire fewer software engineers. But because the output is so incredible, people want to hire more This is going to show up in our economy somehow, soon. Useful AI has arrived"

X Freeze

109,113 views • 2 months ago

Saying immigrants are coming to take black jobs is the most racist shit someone can say, like we are only good for low wage shit jobs. I'm black and I'm a software engineer.

Saying immigrants are coming to take black jobs is the most racist shit someone can say, like we are only good for low wage shit jobs. I'm black and I'm a software engineer.

Alex Cole

2,680,755 views • 2 years ago

CBS: “President Trump has called Anthropic a left-wing woke company.” ANTHROPIC CEO: “I can't speak for what other parties are doing.” CBS: “But you, and here at Anthropic?” ANTHROPIC CEO: “Yeah look, we, we, but we, we, I think have tried to be very neutral.”

CBS: “President Trump has called Anthropic a left-wing woke company.” ANTHROPIC CEO: “I can't speak for what other parties are doing.” CBS: “But you, and here at Anthropic?” ANTHROPIC CEO: “Yeah look, we, we, but we, we, I think have tried to be very neutral.”

Chief Nerd

370,997 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BILL GURLEY: “I would encourage people to read as much as they can about Anthropic … I don't think they think they're writing software. I think they're midwifing a deity.” JASON: “I know some of these folks … They believe they're so powerful, that they can create God.”

🚨 BILL GURLEY: “I would encourage people to read as much as they can about Anthropic … I don't think they think they're writing software. I think they're midwifing a deity.” JASON: “I know some of these folks … They believe they're so powerful, that they can create God.”

Chief Nerd

1,060,184 views • 2 months ago

Gavin Baker says the Anthropic S-1 will break a lot of investors' brains "The Anthropic S-1 is going to be really important. And it's going to break a lot of people's brains. There are a lot of macro and value investors who are very confidently making these prognostications about AI with the assumption that tokens are subsidized." "Anthropic is generating cash. They're profitable. Open source tokens are profitable. OpenAI, if they're not generating cash, they will be imminently. SpaceX, same thing." "These macro and value investors are ignorant. They're very smart, but they're ignorant of the facts. They're making an assumption that tokens are subsidized and this is all going to collapse in some circular financing bonfire." "They're just wrong. The overwhelming majority of tokens are profitable for everyone in the chain. Everyone." "It's saying I'm very bearish on the world economy because oil is at $500 a barrel. If oil was at $500 a barrel, that'd be a good reason to be bearish. It's just not. They're just wrong. The central fact is wrong."

Gavin Baker says the Anthropic S-1 will break a lot of investors' brains "The Anthropic S-1 is going to be really important. And it's going to break a lot of people's brains. There are a lot of macro and value investors who are very confidently making these prognostications about AI with the assumption that tokens are subsidized." "Anthropic is generating cash. They're profitable. Open source tokens are profitable. OpenAI, if they're not generating cash, they will be imminently. SpaceX, same thing." "These macro and value investors are ignorant. They're very smart, but they're ignorant of the facts. They're making an assumption that tokens are subsidized and this is all going to collapse in some circular financing bonfire." "They're just wrong. The overwhelming majority of tokens are profitable for everyone in the chain. Everyone." "It's saying I'm very bearish on the world economy because oil is at $500 a barrel. If oil was at $500 a barrel, that'd be a good reason to be bearish. It's just not. They're just wrong. The central fact is wrong."

dnap

534,581 views • 5 days ago

Anthropic engineer: “80% of our engineers are using Loops. Now everyone is exploring how to build right Context for agents.” in 3-6 months, we’ll all become context engineers. Context is the most important part of agents.” in this 1-hour talk, Anthropic engineer shows how to build a self-improving agents from sratch. It’s worth more than a $500 agentic course. Watch this video, then read the article below on how to become a context architect.

Anthropic engineer: “80% of our engineers are using Loops. Now everyone is exploring how to build right Context for agents.” in 3-6 months, we’ll all become context engineers. Context is the most important part of agents.” in this 1-hour talk, Anthropic engineer shows how to build a self-improving agents from sratch. It’s worth more than a $500 agentic course. Watch this video, then read the article below on how to become a context architect.

Codez

35,798 views • 23 days ago

New interview of Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei on AI's job impact: Entry-level office work gets hit first. "Tthe first thing to be disrupted is these kind of entry-level white-collar jobs: data entry, document review for law, or the stuff you’d give a first-year in finance where you’re analyzing documents. I still think those are going pretty fast. But I actually think software might go even faster because of the reasons I gave. I don’t think we’re that far from models being able to do a lot of it end-to-end. What we’re going to see first is the model only does a piece of what the human software engineer does, and that increases their productivity. Then, even when the models do everything that human software engineers used to do, the human software engineers take a step up. They act as managers and supervise the systems." --- Video from "Interesting Times with Ross Douthat + New York Times Opinion + New York Times Podcasts" YT channel (link in comment)

New interview of Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei on AI's job impact: Entry-level office work gets hit first. "Tthe first thing to be disrupted is these kind of entry-level white-collar jobs: data entry, document review for law, or the stuff you’d give a first-year in finance where you’re analyzing documents. I still think those are going pretty fast. But I actually think software might go even faster because of the reasons I gave. I don’t think we’re that far from models being able to do a lot of it end-to-end. What we’re going to see first is the model only does a piece of what the human software engineer does, and that increases their productivity. Then, even when the models do everything that human software engineers used to do, the human software engineers take a step up. They act as managers and supervise the systems." --- Video from "Interesting Times with Ross Douthat + New York Times Opinion + New York Times Podcasts" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

343,163 views • 6 months ago

🚨 ELON MUSK: "AI will outperform humans at most jobs." “I do think it’s going to be a bumpy road, because AI will be able to do any job better than any person can do that job. That will be true very quickly for jobs that are digital, or really anything that involves a person at a computer or on a phone. AI will be able to do all of that very soon. For software engineering, we already have a situation where AI is better than at least 90% of humans at writing software, including 90% of professional software engineers. It really is getting to the point where it will be better than 99%, and then it will get to the point where there’s just no way to compete. It will get to what I call Stockfish level. Stockfish is a chess program that is so good at chess that it will easily beat Magnus Carlsen, or anyone, even while running on a small computer. I suspect you could probably run Stockfish on your phone and beat Magnus Carlsen. That’s how good it is at chess, and that’s how good AI will be at writing software. And that applies to everything.”

🚨 ELON MUSK: "AI will outperform humans at most jobs." “I do think it’s going to be a bumpy road, because AI will be able to do any job better than any person can do that job. That will be true very quickly for jobs that are digital, or really anything that involves a person at a computer or on a phone. AI will be able to do all of that very soon. For software engineering, we already have a situation where AI is better than at least 90% of humans at writing software, including 90% of professional software engineers. It really is getting to the point where it will be better than 99%, and then it will get to the point where there’s just no way to compete. It will get to what I call Stockfish level. Stockfish is a chess program that is so good at chess that it will easily beat Magnus Carlsen, or anyone, even while running on a small computer. I suspect you could probably run Stockfish on your phone and beat Magnus Carlsen. That’s how good it is at chess, and that’s how good AI will be at writing software. And that applies to everything.”

DogeDesigner

61,112 views • 27 days ago

Anish Acharya: We're going to see a "YouTube moment for software": "If you think about YouTube 20 years ago—we had lots of video and lots of television, and it was high production quality, and it wasn't clear that we needed more and 20 years later, YouTube's a $550 billion enterprise that would be one of the biggest companies in the world if it was independent." "I think the same thing is going to happen for software. People want to make software, and for the first time they can—and they can distribute it and they can consume it." "Sometimes it's going to be important software. Sometimes it's going to be totally trivial. It's going to be software for a bachelor party weekend, software for a joke, software for a prompt. We have this sort of seriousness about software that we had about video and television 20 years ago." "Now it's like—I just took a video on my phone. It's going to be like—I just made an app on my phone. Same energy." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

Anish Acharya: We're going to see a "YouTube moment for software": "If you think about YouTube 20 years ago—we had lots of video and lots of television, and it was high production quality, and it wasn't clear that we needed more and 20 years later, YouTube's a $550 billion enterprise that would be one of the biggest companies in the world if it was independent." "I think the same thing is going to happen for software. People want to make software, and for the first time they can—and they can distribute it and they can consume it." "Sometimes it's going to be important software. Sometimes it's going to be totally trivial. It's going to be software for a bachelor party weekend, software for a joke, software for a prompt. We have this sort of seriousness about software that we had about video and television 20 years ago." "Now it's like—I just took a video on my phone. It's going to be like—I just made an app on my phone. Same energy." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

a16z

102,908 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

ANI

114,594 views • 1 month ago

David Sacks on How Anthropic is Ironically Running Surveillance on Their Latest Models “This is the company that said that it was against government surveillance. They are now retaining for 30 days every prompt and every output you send to one of these Mythos class models.”

David Sacks on How Anthropic is Ironically Running Surveillance on Their Latest Models “This is the company that said that it was against government surveillance. They are now retaining for 30 days every prompt and every output you send to one of these Mythos class models.”

Chief Nerd

277,546 views • 2 months ago

Whew, so glad Marco Rubio explained what a “Black Job” is. Don’t you all feel a lot better? Apparently a “Black job” is a “lower wage” job. So that means a high wage position must be a white job, am I understanding this right? Hey “Blacks for Trump” you good with this rhetoric? Black people on the fence, Republicans are racist and don’t care about us. The reason they believe we are only good for low wage jobs is because they think they are superior. They accuse Black people of making up stories of racism while they are outwardly racist. Trump and his ilk have never been pro-Black because they are frightened we are coming for their jobs. Hence why they want to get rid of diversity and inclusion in colleges and at the workplace. Migrants aren't the enemies, Republicans are. #DemsUnited

Whew, so glad Marco Rubio explained what a “Black Job” is. Don’t you all feel a lot better? Apparently a “Black job” is a “lower wage” job. So that means a high wage position must be a white job, am I understanding this right? Hey “Blacks for Trump” you good with this rhetoric? Black people on the fence, Republicans are racist and don’t care about us. The reason they believe we are only good for low wage jobs is because they think they are superior. They accuse Black people of making up stories of racism while they are outwardly racist. Trump and his ilk have never been pro-Black because they are frightened we are coming for their jobs. Hence why they want to get rid of diversity and inclusion in colleges and at the workplace. Migrants aren't the enemies, Republicans are. #DemsUnited

LanaQuest aka RosaSparks

2,157,834 views • 2 years ago

I hate LeetCode grinding. So, I fixed it. Mockrr is a tool I developed to teach engineers how to be better problem solvers in coding interviews using my patent-pending process. By a former FAANG software engineer, for engineers.

I hate LeetCode grinding. So, I fixed it. Mockrr is a tool I developed to teach engineers how to be better problem solvers in coding interviews using my patent-pending process. By a former FAANG software engineer, for engineers.

Anthony D. Mays

24,936 views • 1 year ago

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

798,499 views • 3 months ago

The three ways AI, particularly long-horizon agents, are changing the role of PMs: "First, product development is changing because the models and the capabilities are growing so fast that if you try to be very strict and stringent about describing exactly what you're going to build, its not going to work. It's very important for the PMs to be understanding of what these models are capable of and to be hands-on. The only thing PMs do now is articulate what the customer needs are at the highest level. But the actual product is built bottoms up by engineers, researchers, and product managers and designers all working together on the code itself. Second, the product manager and designer role are merging increasingly. When given the choice between an extra designer and extra engineer, they're saying, give us an extra engineer. And the other very important thing that's fundamentally different is non-deterministic software. Today, you could do X, Y happens. But if you do slight variation of X something completely different happens. That means someone has to evaluate whether or not what the software is producing is reasonable or not across various use cases. So the PM's job is to be very clear at a high level of what the user needs are, and then have a very clear sense of whether this product is good to ship or not by evaluating it."

The three ways AI, particularly long-horizon agents, are changing the role of PMs: "First, product development is changing because the models and the capabilities are growing so fast that if you try to be very strict and stringent about describing exactly what you're going to build, its not going to work. It's very important for the PMs to be understanding of what these models are capable of and to be hands-on. The only thing PMs do now is articulate what the customer needs are at the highest level. But the actual product is built bottoms up by engineers, researchers, and product managers and designers all working together on the code itself. Second, the product manager and designer role are merging increasingly. When given the choice between an extra designer and extra engineer, they're saying, give us an extra engineer. And the other very important thing that's fundamentally different is non-deterministic software. Today, you could do X, Y happens. But if you do slight variation of X something completely different happens. That means someone has to evaluate whether or not what the software is producing is reasonable or not across various use cases. So the PM's job is to be very clear at a high level of what the user needs are, and then have a very clear sense of whether this product is good to ship or not by evaluating it."

Patrick OShaughnessy

41,781 views • 6 months ago

Gavin Baker and David Sacks predict $400-500 billion ARR for Anthropic in 2027 Gavin: "I'm going to take the over on whatever the Wall Street consensus is for 2027, which I don't know. I'll take a 25 to 30% over on that." "I think $400-500 billion is in the zone of realistically achievable." Sacks: "I actually was going to say $400-500 billion as exit ARR for next year. Seems very comfortable. "The only reason it's not higher is because I do think that somehow you get into physical limitations at that point. But maybe not, maybe there'll be enough compute." Jason: "We all believe that they're going to hit $400 billion next year, and they're going to 4x $100 billion." "We were talking about them at $10 billion four months ago. $10 billion to $400 billion is a 40x..."

Gavin Baker and David Sacks predict $400-500 billion ARR for Anthropic in 2027 Gavin: "I'm going to take the over on whatever the Wall Street consensus is for 2027, which I don't know. I'll take a 25 to 30% over on that." "I think $400-500 billion is in the zone of realistically achievable." Sacks: "I actually was going to say $400-500 billion as exit ARR for next year. Seems very comfortable. "The only reason it's not higher is because I do think that somehow you get into physical limitations at that point. But maybe not, maybe there'll be enough compute." Jason: "We all believe that they're going to hit $400 billion next year, and they're going to 4x $100 billion." "We were talking about them at $10 billion four months ago. $10 billion to $400 billion is a 40x..."

dnap

433,337 views • 5 days ago

Ossoff: There at some point is going to be a reckoning for all of this. These folks who are working at these private prison companies, who are on Kristi Noem staff right now, they are at some point going to have to testify under oath about what is happening in the facilities that they're currently running.

Ossoff: There at some point is going to be a reckoning for all of this. These folks who are working at these private prison companies, who are on Kristi Noem staff right now, they are at some point going to have to testify under oath about what is happening in the facilities that they're currently running.

Acyn

29,913 views • 1 year ago