Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini-3.6-Flash both given the exact same prompt to build 3D pirate ship Cost: > deepseek-v4-flash: $0.14 / $0.28 > gemini-3.6-flash: $1.50 / $7.50 though deepseek is 20x cheaper, gemini was surprising faster with the output Prompt used: "build a 3D model of pirate ship in Three js...

TimJayas's profile picture

Tim Jayas

3,825 subscribers

20,127 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 DeepSeek V4 GA vs Fable 5 I gave both models the exact same 3D game generation prompt The results surprised me In my test, DeepSeek V4 GA produced the stronger output > Better environment generation > Stronger implementation > Excellent price-to-performance Which one do you prefer? 👇
0:53

🚨 DeepSeek V4 GA vs Fable 5 I gave both models the exact same 3D game generation prompt The results surprised me In my test, DeepSeek V4 GA produced the stronger output > Better environment generation > Stronger implementation > Excellent price-to-performance Which one do you prefer? 👇

Salio

31,520 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

I didn't expect DeepSeek v4 PRO (not Flash) to run well on the Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 512GB of RAM. This is 2 bit quantized with the same DwarfStar recipe used for Flash. 433GB GGUF file. 130 t/s prefill, 13 t/s generation. Prefill in the video is low because small prompt.
1:24

I didn't expect DeepSeek v4 PRO (not Flash) to run well on the Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 512GB of RAM. This is 2 bit quantized with the same DwarfStar recipe used for Flash. 433GB GGUF file. 130 t/s prefill, 13 t/s generation. Prefill in the video is low because small prompt.

antirez

171,478 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 in Hermes Agent and one prompt, took 32 minutes and cost 0.07$, this model is so cheap to the point where 2 dollars can last you a full day.
1:03

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 in Hermes Agent and one prompt, took 32 minutes and cost 0.07$, this model is so cheap to the point where 2 dollars can last you a full day.

Elshayib

668,858 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Today, we're introducing not one but TWO new models, striking the balance between efficiency and quality to enable you to build production AI agents. — Gemini 3.6 Flash: Addresses efficiency feedback we received from Gemini 3.5 Flash with upgrades in coding, knowledge work, and multimodal tasks faster, more accurately, and with substantially fewer tokens per task — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Our fastest, most cost-effective 3.5-class model yet built for agentic workflows, hitting ~350 output tokens/sec with improved coding and overall quality Start building with these today via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio or try them out in the Google Gemini
0:42

Today, we're introducing not one but TWO new models, striking the balance between efficiency and quality to enable you to build production AI agents. — Gemini 3.6 Flash: Addresses efficiency feedback we received from Gemini 3.5 Flash with upgrades in coding, knowledge work, and multimodal tasks faster, more accurately, and with substantially fewer tokens per task — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Our fastest, most cost-effective 3.5-class model yet built for agentic workflows, hitting ~350 output tokens/sec with improved coding and overall quality Start building with these today via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio or try them out in the Google Gemini

Google AI

434,795 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Timelapse #177 (14 hrs) - Picked up an RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell and wired in another 1000W PSU - running two of them now - DeepSeek v4 Flash running locally on both GPUs - Distilling DeepSeek v4 Flash down into Nanbeige (still cooking) - Kernel bench runs for DeepSeek v4 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Max - Got it into chat but couldn't reliably get it into the OMP harness yet - Private contract work - days like this are stuff I actually want to build. and when it's the high-intensity grind, i still have to show up and get it done
0:30

Timelapse #177 (14 hrs) - Picked up an RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell and wired in another 1000W PSU - running two of them now - DeepSeek v4 Flash running locally on both GPUs - Distilling DeepSeek v4 Flash down into Nanbeige (still cooking) - Kernel bench runs for DeepSeek v4 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Max - Got it into chat but couldn't reliably get it into the OMP harness yet - Private contract work - days like this are stuff I actually want to build. and when it's the high-intensity grind, i still have to show up and get it done

Elliot Arledge

17,401 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Gemini 3 Flash is here, rolling out now in AI Mode in Search! ⚡️⚡️⚡️ 3 Flash brings frontier model intelligence to everyone...with the speed and accuracy of Google Search. Excited to ship it globally! Try it now at
0:41

Gemini 3 Flash is here, rolling out now in AI Mode in Search! ⚡️⚡️⚡️ 3 Flash brings frontier model intelligence to everyone...with the speed and accuracy of Google Search. Excited to ship it globally! Try it now at

Nick Fox

27,504 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Stop paying for 5 different AI subscriptions. ChatLLM by Abacus AI puts GPT-5.5, Claude 4.7, Gemini 3.1, DeepSeek-V4, Kimi-2.6 in one place. One prompt → routed to the best model → output. Pay once. Use all of them.
0:35

Stop paying for 5 different AI subscriptions. ChatLLM by Abacus AI puts GPT-5.5, Claude 4.7, Gemini 3.1, DeepSeek-V4, Kimi-2.6 in one place. One prompt → routed to the best model → output. Pay once. Use all of them.

Abacus.AI

26,751,775 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

New ways for developers to build with Gemini → 😎 Gemini 1.5 Flash joins 1.5 Pro in public preview via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio 🥳 A new Context Caching feature in the Gemini API 🤗 A preview of our 2 million context window #GoogleIO
1:37

New ways for developers to build with Gemini → 😎 Gemini 1.5 Flash joins 1.5 Pro in public preview via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio 🥳 A new Context Caching feature in the Gemini API 🤗 A preview of our 2 million context window #GoogleIO

Google for Developers

17,467 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Co-designing Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite with the Trillium TPU was the key to unlocking the lightning speeds of 2.5 Flash-Lite. This Infinite Wiki by Dev Valladares is an incredible demonstration of what is possible with this model. We're so excited to see what you continue to build!
0:30

Co-designing Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite with the Trillium TPU was the key to unlocking the lightning speeds of 2.5 Flash-Lite. This Infinite Wiki by Dev Valladares is an incredible demonstration of what is possible with this model. We're so excited to see what you continue to build!

Google AI

49,984 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

New LFM2.5-2.6B hits DeepSeek-V4 level on tool calling and runs 3.7x faster! We ran Liquid AI 's new LFM2.5-2.6B against DeepSeek-V4-Flash on one box with 4x RTX 5090. Both got the same three jobs, and each one only completes if the model fires every tool call Topics: -weather and local time in six cities -one budget into six currencies -four hotels checked and booked for one date Outputs: LFM2.5-2.6B: 35/35 tool-calls, 366 tok/s, 19s DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 35/35 tool-calls, 77 tok/s, 70s Both models made all 35 calls, and both fired twelve of them in one turn. LFM was trained for agents, and tool calling is where that shows. Strong result for a model you can run right on your phone
0:25

New LFM2.5-2.6B hits DeepSeek-V4 level on tool calling and runs 3.7x faster! We ran Liquid AI 's new LFM2.5-2.6B against DeepSeek-V4-Flash on one box with 4x RTX 5090. Both got the same three jobs, and each one only completes if the model fires every tool call Topics: -weather and local time in six cities -one budget into six currencies -four hotels checked and booked for one date Outputs: LFM2.5-2.6B: 35/35 tool-calls, 366 tok/s, 19s DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 35/35 tool-calls, 77 tok/s, 70s Both models made all 35 calls, and both fired twelve of them in one turn. LFM was trained for agents, and tool calling is where that shows. Strong result for a model you can run right on your phone

atomic.chat

107,238 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Flash checkpoint notes: The old “cool Gemini UI” vibe feels mostly gone. It is more GPTified now. Good: fast, smart for a Flash model. Bad: it keeps filling websites with HUDs/panels, even when the prompt asks for restraint. Biggest issue: prompt adherence. I told it multiple times not to use web, and it still did. Because of that, exact knowledge cutoff is hard to verify confidently.
0:48

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Flash checkpoint notes: The old “cool Gemini UI” vibe feels mostly gone. It is more GPTified now. Good: fast, smart for a Flash model. Bad: it keeps filling websites with HUDs/panels, even when the prompt asks for restraint. Biggest issue: prompt adherence. I told it multiple times not to use web, and it still did. Because of that, exact knowledge cutoff is hard to verify confidently.

Chetaslua

127,743 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

FREE DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash API. Runtime by Bad Theory Labs just dropped it. Same platform, new free model, same 2-minute setup. > Runtime already gave you free Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 access. Now they added DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash to the free tier. Absolutely FREE, YES. Same exact flow as before: → Go to runtime(.)badtheorylabs(.)com → Sign up with Google → Fill in your details during onboarding → Free balance lands automatically(But you don't need it to use DeepSeek - it's completely free right now) → Grab your API key from the dashboard → Plug into OpenCode, OpenClaw, or Hermes - done DeepSeek V4 Pro is one of the strongest coding and reasoning models available right now. Free tier also includes btl-2 - auto-routes between GLM, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemma. 10 million tokens per month at zero cost. 344 models total. One OpenAI-compatible endpoint. No code rebuild, no card, no limits hunting. >> Just start using the API, and when choosing a provider, select DeepSeek I tested it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before the free tier fills up.
0:23

FREE DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash API. Runtime by Bad Theory Labs just dropped it. Same platform, new free model, same 2-minute setup. > Runtime already gave you free Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 access. Now they added DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash to the free tier. Absolutely FREE, YES. Same exact flow as before: → Go to runtime(.)badtheorylabs(.)com → Sign up with Google → Fill in your details during onboarding → Free balance lands automatically(But you don't need it to use DeepSeek - it's completely free right now) → Grab your API key from the dashboard → Plug into OpenCode, OpenClaw, or Hermes - done DeepSeek V4 Pro is one of the strongest coding and reasoning models available right now. Free tier also includes btl-2 - auto-routes between GLM, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemma. 10 million tokens per month at zero cost. 344 models total. One OpenAI-compatible endpoint. No code rebuild, no card, no limits hunting. >> Just start using the API, and when choosing a provider, select DeepSeek I tested it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before the free tier fills up.

Atenov int.

26,920 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Gemini 2.5 Flash can control a browser! Excited to share Gemini Browser Agent, a simple Python script example on how to use Google DeepMind Gemini 2.5 Flash and Browser Use to act as general assistant! 🤯 Usage Examples: 1⃣ Single Query Mode: `python scripts/gemini-browser-use.py --url --query "Summarize the key features of Gemini 2.5 Flash."` 2⃣Interactive Mode: Start an interactive session, optionally with a starting URL. `python scripts/gemini-browser-use.py` Command-line options: --model: The Gemini model to use (default: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17) --headless: Run the browser in headless mode --url: Starting URL for the browser to navigate to before processing the query --query: Run a single query and exit (instead of interactive mode) Time to build a replication of Manus and OpenAI Operator powered by Gemini 2.5. Code below ⬇️
0:52

Gemini 2.5 Flash can control a browser! Excited to share Gemini Browser Agent, a simple Python script example on how to use Google DeepMind Gemini 2.5 Flash and Browser Use to act as general assistant! 🤯 Usage Examples: 1⃣ Single Query Mode: `python scripts/gemini-browser-use.py --url --query "Summarize the key features of Gemini 2.5 Flash."` 2⃣Interactive Mode: Start an interactive session, optionally with a starting URL. `python scripts/gemini-browser-use.py` Command-line options: --model: The Gemini model to use (default: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17) --headless: Run the browser in headless mode --url: Starting URL for the browser to navigate to before processing the query --query: Run a single query and exit (instead of interactive mode) Time to build a replication of Manus and OpenAI Operator powered by Gemini 2.5. Code below ⬇️

Philipp Schmid

105,308 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I refuse to believe that I built this website from a single prompt for $0.82 using DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. > cost: $0.82 > 20.2M tokens > 310 requests for transparency, I built the prompt using GPT Sol... its currently the best model for writing a very detailed prompt still absolutely ridiculous...this is with 0 polish, btw.. I can’t imagine how good it would look if I actually polished it..
0:31

I refuse to believe that I built this website from a single prompt for $0.82 using DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. > cost: $0.82 > 20.2M tokens > 310 requests for transparency, I built the prompt using GPT Sol... its currently the best model for writing a very detailed prompt still absolutely ridiculous...this is with 0 polish, btw.. I can’t imagine how good it would look if I actually polished it..

JUMPERZ

63,860 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

🚨 Deepseek V4 pro GA is being tested to few users > this is the output on the same prompt that was used for kimi k3 and GPT sol 5.6 in the quoted video > The details are solid , addition of tents , campfire and everything this model looks promising
0:55

🚨 Deepseek V4 pro GA is being tested to few users > this is the output on the same prompt that was used for kimi k3 and GPT sol 5.6 in the quoted video > The details are solid , addition of tents , campfire and everything this model looks promising

Chetaslua

172,573 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

We put the new Gemini 3.6 Flash from Google DeepMind to work in Box Agent on a pharmaceutical manufacturing deviation. It reconciled a draft investigation using an obsolete SOP with minute-by-minute historian data, equipment audit logs, maintenance records, an executed batch record, and a prior CAPA. Applying the current SOP, Gemini uncovered a second excursion and calculated 147 cumulative minutes against a 120-minute limit. It traced the likely control failure to an unrestored equipment setpoint, then created a cited investigation review for the Quality Unit. Customers can now choose Gemini 3.6 Flash from in Box AI Studio to build custom agents grounded in their enterprise content.
0:48

We put the new Gemini 3.6 Flash from Google DeepMind to work in Box Agent on a pharmaceutical manufacturing deviation. It reconciled a draft investigation using an obsolete SOP with minute-by-minute historian data, equipment audit logs, maintenance records, an executed batch record, and a prior CAPA. Applying the current SOP, Gemini uncovered a second excursion and calculated 147 cumulative minutes against a 120-minute limit. It traced the likely control failure to an unrestored equipment setpoint, then created a cited investigation review for the Quality Unit. Customers can now choose Gemini 3.6 Flash from in Box AI Studio to build custom agents grounded in their enterprise content.

Box

348,850 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Okay… DeepSeek V4 Flash actually COOKED 😭 With OpenCode, I’d place it around GPT-5.6 Terra Max—and definitely above Luna Max in this test. Almost unlimited usage for around €9, by the way. This model is a MASSIVE success. Just don’t use the wrong harness.
0:32

Okay… DeepSeek V4 Flash actually COOKED 😭 With OpenCode, I’d place it around GPT-5.6 Terra Max—and definitely above Luna Max in this test. Almost unlimited usage for around €9, by the way. This model is a MASSIVE success. Just don’t use the wrong harness.

OmedTheVibeCoder

35,417 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Using Starlink and a MacBook to play Blades in the Dark with DeepSeek V4 Flash as GM running on ds4 on a remote M3 Ultra and exposed through tailscale as a service in the middle of mountains. We are living in the best era of humankind! Hey... 👋🏻 not bad the speed eh?
0:50

Using Starlink and a MacBook to play Blades in the Dark with DeepSeek V4 Flash as GM running on ds4 on a remote M3 Ultra and exposed through tailscale as a service in the middle of mountains. We are living in the best era of humankind! Hey... 👋🏻 not bad the speed eh?

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

12,869 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Make a few more of these ... Make a LOT more of these ... Gemini 2.0 native image output is enabling a new way to prompt: instructing with image and text together. Subtle shifts in how I draw change how Gemini interprets the same text prompt.
0:41

Make a few more of these ... Make a LOT more of these ... Gemini 2.0 native image output is enabling a new way to prompt: instructing with image and text together. Subtle shifts in how I draw change how Gemini interprets the same text prompt.

Alexander Chen

23,601 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

qwen 3.8 max vs deepseek v4 flash 0731 vs kimi k3 vs gpt 5.6 sol – on rubik's cube and chess four frontier models built a rubik's cube stand and solved it, then built a chess board and played claude opus 5 on it the setup: Nous Research's hermes agent cli on OpenRouter tasks: 1. cube – build a 3d rubik's cube with a cli and a Three.js viewer, then solve an identical scrambled position on your own stand 2. chess – build a 3d chess stand, then play white against claude opus 5 as black, live, one move at a time. no engine, no solver, no opening book on either side. stockfish depth 14 grades every chess ply afterwards; neither player sees the score models: DeepSeek v4 flash 0731, OpenAI gpt-5.6 sol, Kimi.ai kimi k3, Qwen qwen 3.8 max gpt-5.6 sol and deepseek v4 flash solved their cubes – sol in 24 moves and seventeen seconds, deepseek in 32. qwen and kimi never got there, giving up at 96 and 207 moves then all four built chess stands and played white against claude opus 5 on them, and all four resigned: deepseek on move 13, sol on 19, kimi on 21, qwen holding out longest at 29 - build time, both stands #1 gpt-5.6 sol – 16m 43s #2 deepseek v4 flash – 97m 39s #3 kimi k3 – 166m 09s #4 qwen 3.8 max – 215m 08s - build attempts before a working stand #1 gpt-5.6 sol – 3 #2 qwen 3.8 max – 4 #3 kimi k3 – 4 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 5 - total tokens #1 gpt-5.6 sol – 6,713,754 #2 qwen 3.8 max – 17,272,507 #3 kimi k3 – 22,427,504 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 27,417,442 - total price #1 deepseek v4 flash – $0.557 #2 gpt-5.6 sol – $6.319 #3 qwen 3.8 max – $10.270 #4 kimi k3 – $16.667 observations: • deepseek v4 flash is the cheapest model here by a margin nobody else is near, and it got there while being the least efficient of the four. it burned 27.4m tokens – more than anyone, 5m more than kimi – and still finished both benchmarks for $0.557. that is $0.02 per million tokens against kimi's $0.74. it also needed the most passes to produce working stands, five, and that did not matter: all five deepseek passes together cost a thirtieth of kimi's two • so what deepseek cannot do is get it right the first time. what it can do is get it right the fifth time, for half a dollar. that is a different thing to be buying – not a good first draft, but the option to keep asking • gpt-5.6 sol is the opposite profile and the strongest of the four on pure efficiency. 16m 43s to build both stands, 6.7m tokens, three passes – under 40% of the next lowest token count and a quarter of deepseek's, on an eighth of qwen's clock. it also solved the cube fastest of anyone, 24 moves in seventeen seconds. sol is what you reach for when you want the answer now and can absorb $0.94 per million • sol's weakness is in what it does not check. its chess viewer deleted the capturing piece instead of the captured one, so pieces disappeared off the board mid-game – a defect the fifty-cent deepseek stand did not have. fast and terse turns out to be the same dial as fast and unverified • qwen 3.8 max is not the cheap open-weights option it gets treated as. $10.270 across the two benchmarks, second most expensive of the four, 18x deepseek, and by a distance the slowest – 215 minutes of build time, nearly thirteen times sol's. what the money buys is judgment: it played eighteen moves without a single error worth a hundredth of a pawn, then made exactly one bad move in the whole game, and averaged 44.6 centipawns lost across the longest game any of the four managed. it also could not solve a rubik's cube in 96 tries • kimi k3 is the one line with no reading that flatters it. most expensive at $16.667, last on the cube at 207 moves, last at chess at 478 centipawns lost per move. it is also the model that verified hardest – on the cube it wrote its own integrity check instead of trusting its output. that makes the result worse rather than better: the checking was real, and the reasoning underneath it still was not follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns
1:03

qwen 3.8 max vs deepseek v4 flash 0731 vs kimi k3 vs gpt 5.6 sol – on rubik's cube and chess four frontier models built a rubik's cube stand and solved it, then built a chess board and played claude opus 5 on it the setup: Nous Research's hermes agent cli on OpenRouter tasks: 1. cube – build a 3d rubik's cube with a cli and a Three.js viewer, then solve an identical scrambled position on your own stand 2. chess – build a 3d chess stand, then play white against claude opus 5 as black, live, one move at a time. no engine, no solver, no opening book on either side. stockfish depth 14 grades every chess ply afterwards; neither player sees the score models: DeepSeek v4 flash 0731, OpenAI gpt-5.6 sol, Kimi.ai kimi k3, Qwen qwen 3.8 max gpt-5.6 sol and deepseek v4 flash solved their cubes – sol in 24 moves and seventeen seconds, deepseek in 32. qwen and kimi never got there, giving up at 96 and 207 moves then all four built chess stands and played white against claude opus 5 on them, and all four resigned: deepseek on move 13, sol on 19, kimi on 21, qwen holding out longest at 29 - build time, both stands #1 gpt-5.6 sol – 16m 43s #2 deepseek v4 flash – 97m 39s #3 kimi k3 – 166m 09s #4 qwen 3.8 max – 215m 08s - build attempts before a working stand #1 gpt-5.6 sol – 3 #2 qwen 3.8 max – 4 #3 kimi k3 – 4 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 5 - total tokens #1 gpt-5.6 sol – 6,713,754 #2 qwen 3.8 max – 17,272,507 #3 kimi k3 – 22,427,504 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 27,417,442 - total price #1 deepseek v4 flash – $0.557 #2 gpt-5.6 sol – $6.319 #3 qwen 3.8 max – $10.270 #4 kimi k3 – $16.667 observations: • deepseek v4 flash is the cheapest model here by a margin nobody else is near, and it got there while being the least efficient of the four. it burned 27.4m tokens – more than anyone, 5m more than kimi – and still finished both benchmarks for $0.557. that is $0.02 per million tokens against kimi's $0.74. it also needed the most passes to produce working stands, five, and that did not matter: all five deepseek passes together cost a thirtieth of kimi's two • so what deepseek cannot do is get it right the first time. what it can do is get it right the fifth time, for half a dollar. that is a different thing to be buying – not a good first draft, but the option to keep asking • gpt-5.6 sol is the opposite profile and the strongest of the four on pure efficiency. 16m 43s to build both stands, 6.7m tokens, three passes – under 40% of the next lowest token count and a quarter of deepseek's, on an eighth of qwen's clock. it also solved the cube fastest of anyone, 24 moves in seventeen seconds. sol is what you reach for when you want the answer now and can absorb $0.94 per million • sol's weakness is in what it does not check. its chess viewer deleted the capturing piece instead of the captured one, so pieces disappeared off the board mid-game – a defect the fifty-cent deepseek stand did not have. fast and terse turns out to be the same dial as fast and unverified • qwen 3.8 max is not the cheap open-weights option it gets treated as. $10.270 across the two benchmarks, second most expensive of the four, 18x deepseek, and by a distance the slowest – 215 minutes of build time, nearly thirteen times sol's. what the money buys is judgment: it played eighteen moves without a single error worth a hundredth of a pawn, then made exactly one bad move in the whole game, and averaged 44.6 centipawns lost across the longest game any of the four managed. it also could not solve a rubik's cube in 96 tries • kimi k3 is the one line with no reading that flatters it. most expensive at $16.667, last on the cube at 207 moves, last at chess at 478 centipawns lost per move. it is also the model that verified hardest – on the cube it wrote its own integrity check instead of trusting its output. that makes the result worse rather than better: the checking was real, and the reasoning underneath it still was not follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

78,036 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen