Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

DEVELOPING: Oscar-winning director Danny Boyle recently confirmed that his upcoming release this December titled Ink uses AI, estimating roughly 30 seconds of AI use which includes reproducing mice. I find this so disappointing, especially considering all the Oscar buzz this film is receiving. We just witnessed Christopher Nolan direct...

80,040 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

33 Yorum

Jeheskiel Sunloy profil fotoğrafı
Jeheskiel Sunloy7 gün önce

treating 30 seconds of digital mice like the fall of cinema is crazy

mjb profil fotoğrafı
mjb7 gün önce

Did you bother to actually read why or is just another one of your stupid uneducated takes for clicks?

Jess Lucero profil fotoğrafı
Jess Lucero7 gün önce

He definitely used more AI then that. He is only sharing what he is willing to share. Essentially, you can't trust what you see in the film.

Doug Borton profil fotoğrafı
Doug Borton7 gün önce

Who cares? AI is now just another tool. It will be used when convenient, like CG and other effects.

Chriszy profil fotoğrafı
Chriszy7 gün önce

People complaining are always non CG/VFX people. It saves them time from modeling mice and animating it for a mid-low budget drama. Accountants arent being vilified for using calculators when it was invented. Also citing Nolan’s work is silly. Thats a 250million drama

Geoff Langenderfer profil fotoğrafı
Geoff Langenderfer7 gün önce

huh? Who cares if he used AI I just want great stories

Lando profil fotoğrafı
Lando7 gün önce

Isn’t CGI the same thing?

Bitsy profil fotoğrafı
Bitsy7 gün önce

Yeah. I hate that movies are in color these days. So disappointing.

Paul profil fotoğrafı
Paul7 gün önce

I’m affraid that A.I is not going away. We better embrace it as a tool. Human creativity will always be my preference but if A.I as a tool can make the process of filmmaking smoother and more room in a tight budget, i can see why people choose this route.

the pennsyltucky kid profil fotoğrafı
the pennsyltucky kid7 gün önce

Despicable - using AI just so they didn’t have to pay real mice

Ryan Loves Movies profil fotoğrafı
Ryan Loves Movies7 gün önce

30 seconds of AI use, lol. Who cares? Silly.

Fox profil fotoğrafı
Fox7 gün önce

Shock horror, 30 seconds of AI! How is it any different to ADR? On every film or trailer we bring actors back in (or hire a soundalike) to re-record dialog. How is it different?

movies are fun profil fotoğrafı
movies are fun7 gün önce

Cinema is all about using tricks to create illusions and this honestly no different Its unavoidable that studios and independent creators alike will use ai in their projects, its faster, cheaper and easier, i am not saying it should be embraced, but its unavoidable imo

Alex Mackenzie profil fotoğrafı
Alex Mackenzie7 gün önce

I don’t know, his reasoning and rationale seems pretty understandable and I don’t like the idea of AI creating art. How is this much different to other previous examples of CG? If he was using it to completely craft scenes or performances, then sure, different discussion.

Episodez profil fotoğrafı
Episodez7 gün önce

Right. Let's tell an Oscar-winning director what tools he should use to make movies.

Zayy profil fotoğrafı
Zayy7 gün önce

Pretty sure everything Netflix puts out at this point has some sort of gen AI attached to it

Nathan Raymond Rae profil fotoğrafı
Nathan Raymond Rae7 gün önce

Why did he bother using digital cameras to film "28 Days Later" and "Slumdog Millionaire" when doing so was unpopular?

MovieMagic | 🇵🇸 #FreePalestine profil fotoğrafı
MovieMagic | 🇵🇸 #FreePalestine7 gün önce

if it's a Tool so what?!, if it's taking jobs then we have a problem. if it's for a mice scene, what makes it different from computer generated VFX !! before VFX, filmmakers used practical effects, now they are using Ai effects. again, if it's a tool and not taking jobs, so what?

Gideon Hansen profil fotoğrafı
Gideon Hansen7 gün önce

This is taking away real jobs from the mice actors guild!

ASometimesWorst profil fotoğrafı
ASometimesWorst7 gün önce

I don't think it is going anywhere, people are just going to have to decide if they will want to watch it or not

Tristen Rodrigue profil fotoğrafı
Tristen Rodrigue7 gün önce

Overrated director anyways

i cant even productions profil fotoğrafı
i cant even productions7 gün önce

Smooth brain can’t even grasp the plot of the movie

Mike Ravioli profil fotoğrafı
Mike Ravioli7 gün önce

When am Oscar winning director uses AI for 30 total seconds of reproducing mice . God get over yourselves.

Nippon Steel profil fotoğrafı
Nippon Steel7 gün önce

Wow, an AI mouse rather than a CGI mouse. The walls of Troy are falling!!

conju profil fotoğrafı
conju7 gün önce

He's only made one good movie. SM. Everything else is overhyped bullshit

PopsnFlops profil fotoğrafı
PopsnFlops7 gün önce

It’s the future. It’s cheap and the tech is good. When used in the right way it’ll save on huge production costs

Greek_Gatsby profil fotoğrafı
Greek_Gatsby7 gün önce

Its not the use of AI that should bother you but more how it is used. Using 30 seconds of AI mice instead of CGI ones shouldn't feel like the end of cinema

Blex profil fotoğrafı
Blex7 gün önce

You are just a dork ass in apartment who types tweets you don’t create shit who cares

Athol Brose profil fotoğrafı
Athol Brose7 gün önce

It isn’t to save them time. It is to save them from spending money on other artists, photographers, visual effects teams. If they have no respect for other artists work then nobody should have respect for theirs.

bryu6308 profil fotoğrafı
bryu63087 gün önce

@FilmExpressYT Danny Boyle’s washed again

Diego profil fotoğrafı
Diego7 gün önce

Just accept dude, Ai is going to be part of Cinema, either you wanted or not

Johnathan Quayle Higgins profil fotoğrafı
Johnathan Quayle Higgins7 gün önce

Get over it

Paul Reynolds profil fotoğrafı
Paul Reynolds7 gün önce

30 seconds. C’mon.

Benzer Videolar

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce