Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

DEVELOPING: Oscar-winning director Danny Boyle recently confirmed that his upcoming release this December titled Ink uses AI, estimating roughly 30 seconds of AI use which includes reproducing mice. I find this so disappointing, especially considering all the Oscar buzz this film is receiving. We just witnessed Christopher Nolan direct...

80,040 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

33 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jeheskiel Sunloy
Jeheskiel Sunloyvor 7 Tagen

treating 30 seconds of digital mice like the fall of cinema is crazy

Profilbild von mjb
mjbvor 7 Tagen

Did you bother to actually read why or is just another one of your stupid uneducated takes for clicks?

Profilbild von Jess Lucero
Jess Lucerovor 7 Tagen

He definitely used more AI then that. He is only sharing what he is willing to share. Essentially, you can't trust what you see in the film.

Profilbild von Doug Borton
Doug Bortonvor 7 Tagen

Who cares? AI is now just another tool. It will be used when convenient, like CG and other effects.

Profilbild von Chriszy
Chriszyvor 7 Tagen

People complaining are always non CG/VFX people. It saves them time from modeling mice and animating it for a mid-low budget drama. Accountants arent being vilified for using calculators when it was invented. Also citing Nolan’s work is silly. Thats a 250million drama

Profilbild von Geoff Langenderfer
Geoff Langenderfervor 7 Tagen

huh? Who cares if he used AI I just want great stories

Profilbild von Lando
Landovor 7 Tagen

Isn’t CGI the same thing?

Profilbild von Bitsy
Bitsyvor 7 Tagen

Yeah. I hate that movies are in color these days. So disappointing.

Profilbild von Paul
Paulvor 7 Tagen

I’m affraid that A.I is not going away. We better embrace it as a tool. Human creativity will always be my preference but if A.I as a tool can make the process of filmmaking smoother and more room in a tight budget, i can see why people choose this route.

Profilbild von the pennsyltucky kid
the pennsyltucky kidvor 7 Tagen

Despicable - using AI just so they didn’t have to pay real mice

Profilbild von Ryan Loves Movies
Ryan Loves Moviesvor 7 Tagen

30 seconds of AI use, lol. Who cares? Silly.

Profilbild von Fox
Foxvor 7 Tagen

Shock horror, 30 seconds of AI! How is it any different to ADR? On every film or trailer we bring actors back in (or hire a soundalike) to re-record dialog. How is it different?

Profilbild von movies are fun
movies are funvor 7 Tagen

Cinema is all about using tricks to create illusions and this honestly no different Its unavoidable that studios and independent creators alike will use ai in their projects, its faster, cheaper and easier, i am not saying it should be embraced, but its unavoidable imo

Profilbild von Alex Mackenzie
Alex Mackenzievor 7 Tagen

I don’t know, his reasoning and rationale seems pretty understandable and I don’t like the idea of AI creating art. How is this much different to other previous examples of CG? If he was using it to completely craft scenes or performances, then sure, different discussion.

Profilbild von Episodez
Episodezvor 7 Tagen

Right. Let's tell an Oscar-winning director what tools he should use to make movies.

Profilbild von Zayy
Zayyvor 7 Tagen

Pretty sure everything Netflix puts out at this point has some sort of gen AI attached to it

Profilbild von Nathan Raymond Rae
Nathan Raymond Raevor 7 Tagen

Why did he bother using digital cameras to film "28 Days Later" and "Slumdog Millionaire" when doing so was unpopular?

Profilbild von MovieMagic | 🇵🇸 #FreePalestine
MovieMagic | 🇵🇸 #FreePalestinevor 7 Tagen

if it's a Tool so what?!, if it's taking jobs then we have a problem. if it's for a mice scene, what makes it different from computer generated VFX !! before VFX, filmmakers used practical effects, now they are using Ai effects. again, if it's a tool and not taking jobs, so what?

Profilbild von Gideon Hansen
Gideon Hansenvor 7 Tagen

This is taking away real jobs from the mice actors guild!

Profilbild von ASometimesWorst
ASometimesWorstvor 7 Tagen

I don't think it is going anywhere, people are just going to have to decide if they will want to watch it or not

Profilbild von Tristen Rodrigue
Tristen Rodriguevor 7 Tagen

Overrated director anyways

Profilbild von i cant even productions
i cant even productionsvor 7 Tagen

Smooth brain can’t even grasp the plot of the movie

Profilbild von Mike Ravioli
Mike Raviolivor 7 Tagen

When am Oscar winning director uses AI for 30 total seconds of reproducing mice . God get over yourselves.

Profilbild von Nippon Steel
Nippon Steelvor 7 Tagen

Wow, an AI mouse rather than a CGI mouse. The walls of Troy are falling!!

Profilbild von conju
conjuvor 7 Tagen

He's only made one good movie. SM. Everything else is overhyped bullshit

Profilbild von PopsnFlops
PopsnFlopsvor 7 Tagen

It’s the future. It’s cheap and the tech is good. When used in the right way it’ll save on huge production costs

Profilbild von Greek_Gatsby
Greek_Gatsbyvor 7 Tagen

Its not the use of AI that should bother you but more how it is used. Using 30 seconds of AI mice instead of CGI ones shouldn't feel like the end of cinema

Profilbild von Blex
Blexvor 7 Tagen

You are just a dork ass in apartment who types tweets you don’t create shit who cares

Profilbild von Athol Brose
Athol Brosevor 7 Tagen

It isn’t to save them time. It is to save them from spending money on other artists, photographers, visual effects teams. If they have no respect for other artists work then nobody should have respect for theirs.

Profilbild von bryu6308
bryu6308vor 7 Tagen

@FilmExpressYT Danny Boyle’s washed again

Profilbild von Diego
Diegovor 7 Tagen

Just accept dude, Ai is going to be part of Cinema, either you wanted or not

Profilbild von Johnathan Quayle Higgins
Johnathan Quayle Higginsvor 7 Tagen

Get over it

Profilbild von Paul Reynolds
Paul Reynoldsvor 7 Tagen

30 seconds. C’mon.

Ähnliche Videos

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten