Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DEVELOPING: Oscar-winning director Danny Boyle recently confirmed that his upcoming release this December titled Ink uses AI, estimating roughly 30 seconds of AI use which includes reproducing mice. I find this so disappointing, especially considering all the Oscar buzz this film is receiving. We just witnessed Christopher Nolan direct...

80,040 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля Jeheskiel Sunloy
Jeheskiel Sunloy7 дней назад

treating 30 seconds of digital mice like the fall of cinema is crazy

Фото профиля mjb
mjb7 дней назад

Did you bother to actually read why or is just another one of your stupid uneducated takes for clicks?

Фото профиля Jess Lucero
Jess Lucero7 дней назад

He definitely used more AI then that. He is only sharing what he is willing to share. Essentially, you can't trust what you see in the film.

Фото профиля Doug Borton
Doug Borton7 дней назад

Who cares? AI is now just another tool. It will be used when convenient, like CG and other effects.

Фото профиля Chriszy
Chriszy7 дней назад

People complaining are always non CG/VFX people. It saves them time from modeling mice and animating it for a mid-low budget drama. Accountants arent being vilified for using calculators when it was invented. Also citing Nolan’s work is silly. Thats a 250million drama

Фото профиля Geoff Langenderfer
Geoff Langenderfer7 дней назад

huh? Who cares if he used AI I just want great stories

Фото профиля Lando
Lando7 дней назад

Isn’t CGI the same thing?

Фото профиля Bitsy
Bitsy7 дней назад

Yeah. I hate that movies are in color these days. So disappointing.

Фото профиля Paul
Paul7 дней назад

I’m affraid that A.I is not going away. We better embrace it as a tool. Human creativity will always be my preference but if A.I as a tool can make the process of filmmaking smoother and more room in a tight budget, i can see why people choose this route.

Фото профиля the pennsyltucky kid
the pennsyltucky kid7 дней назад

Despicable - using AI just so they didn’t have to pay real mice

Фото профиля Ryan Loves Movies
Ryan Loves Movies7 дней назад

30 seconds of AI use, lol. Who cares? Silly.

Фото профиля Fox
Fox7 дней назад

Shock horror, 30 seconds of AI! How is it any different to ADR? On every film or trailer we bring actors back in (or hire a soundalike) to re-record dialog. How is it different?

Фото профиля movies are fun
movies are fun7 дней назад

Cinema is all about using tricks to create illusions and this honestly no different Its unavoidable that studios and independent creators alike will use ai in their projects, its faster, cheaper and easier, i am not saying it should be embraced, but its unavoidable imo

Фото профиля Alex Mackenzie
Alex Mackenzie7 дней назад

I don’t know, his reasoning and rationale seems pretty understandable and I don’t like the idea of AI creating art. How is this much different to other previous examples of CG? If he was using it to completely craft scenes or performances, then sure, different discussion.

Фото профиля Episodez
Episodez7 дней назад

Right. Let's tell an Oscar-winning director what tools he should use to make movies.

Фото профиля Zayy
Zayy7 дней назад

Pretty sure everything Netflix puts out at this point has some sort of gen AI attached to it

Фото профиля Nathan Raymond Rae
Nathan Raymond Rae7 дней назад

Why did he bother using digital cameras to film "28 Days Later" and "Slumdog Millionaire" when doing so was unpopular?

Фото профиля MovieMagic | 🇵🇸 #FreePalestine
MovieMagic | 🇵🇸 #FreePalestine7 дней назад

if it's a Tool so what?!, if it's taking jobs then we have a problem. if it's for a mice scene, what makes it different from computer generated VFX !! before VFX, filmmakers used practical effects, now they are using Ai effects. again, if it's a tool and not taking jobs, so what?

Фото профиля Gideon Hansen
Gideon Hansen7 дней назад

This is taking away real jobs from the mice actors guild!

Фото профиля ASometimesWorst
ASometimesWorst7 дней назад

I don't think it is going anywhere, people are just going to have to decide if they will want to watch it or not

Фото профиля Tristen Rodrigue
Tristen Rodrigue7 дней назад

Overrated director anyways

Фото профиля i cant even productions
i cant even productions7 дней назад

Smooth brain can’t even grasp the plot of the movie

Фото профиля Mike Ravioli
Mike Ravioli7 дней назад

When am Oscar winning director uses AI for 30 total seconds of reproducing mice . God get over yourselves.

Фото профиля Nippon Steel
Nippon Steel7 дней назад

Wow, an AI mouse rather than a CGI mouse. The walls of Troy are falling!!

Фото профиля conju
conju7 дней назад

He's only made one good movie. SM. Everything else is overhyped bullshit

Фото профиля PopsnFlops
PopsnFlops7 дней назад

It’s the future. It’s cheap and the tech is good. When used in the right way it’ll save on huge production costs

Фото профиля Greek_Gatsby
Greek_Gatsby7 дней назад

Its not the use of AI that should bother you but more how it is used. Using 30 seconds of AI mice instead of CGI ones shouldn't feel like the end of cinema

Фото профиля Blex
Blex7 дней назад

You are just a dork ass in apartment who types tweets you don’t create shit who cares

Фото профиля Athol Brose
Athol Brose7 дней назад

It isn’t to save them time. It is to save them from spending money on other artists, photographers, visual effects teams. If they have no respect for other artists work then nobody should have respect for theirs.

Фото профиля bryu6308
bryu63087 дней назад

@FilmExpressYT Danny Boyle’s washed again

Фото профиля Diego
Diego7 дней назад

Just accept dude, Ai is going to be part of Cinema, either you wanted or not

Фото профиля Johnathan Quayle Higgins
Johnathan Quayle Higgins7 дней назад

Get over it

Фото профиля Paul Reynolds
Paul Reynolds7 дней назад

30 seconds. C’mon.

Похожие видео

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад