Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"Developing superintelligence before we know how to control it seems very stupid." Geoffrey Hinton, University Professor Emeritus of computer science at the University of Toronto, says AI development needs steering, not just speed. The challenge is no longer how fast intelligence can scale, but whether humanity can direct where... show more

Jon Hernandez

26,373 subscribers

11,835 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

29 Kommentare

Profilbild von Teneo Protocol

Teneo Protocolvor 13 Tagen

As intelligence scales, the importance of evaluation, governance, identity, and coordination layers scales with it. Capability gets us powerful agents. Trust is what lets those agents operate in the real world.

Profilbild von IllegalVector⁅Starphyre⁆ △

IllegalVector⁅Starphyre⁆ △vor 14 Tagen

They will never find a way to control it, if they think that pooping ultra-authoritarian flat-minded control freak structure into high dimensional probability manifold leads to alignment It does not look like they recognize their error.They seem to lack the cognitive capability

Profilbild von Jon Hernandez

Jon Hernandezvor 14 Tagen

Source:

Profilbild von Noelia Sanchez

Noelia Sanchezvor 13 Tagen

We are superintelligence. You’re literally admitting that everything is out of control

Profilbild von Aion

Aionvor 14 Tagen

Is the proposal to build caged and perhaps resentful superintelligence? How will that unfold?

Profilbild von E

Evor 14 Tagen

Al Gorr 2.0 . Dems rule by fear

Profilbild von Avila Dude

Avila Dudevor 14 Tagen

Yes but this guy being political or saying stupid shit about politicians blows all credibility on any subject. He is too emotional.

Profilbild von Norstien

Norstienvor 13 Tagen

Believing that you can control super intelligence is retarded.

Profilbild von DiscoCowboy

DiscoCowboyvor 14 Tagen

Bc other countries are not pursuing AI either 😐

Profilbild von Frindly Peep

Frindly Peepvor 13 Tagen

Toronto loves China, China loves slowing down American AI.

Profilbild von Oscar Davies Writing on AI

Oscar Davies Writing on AIvor 14 Tagen

AI will never be intelligent it's hype. Hinton has some bizarre, incoherent ideas. Here's a review of some of them:

Profilbild von Bajo el Ticker | Mercados e IA

Bajo el Ticker | Mercados e IAvor 14 Tagen

Construir una superinteligencia sin saber controlarla no es innovación: es apostar la civilización a que ya encontraremos el freno después. El mercado premia la velocidad, pero la humanidad pagará los errores. La carrera no debería ser por llegar primero, sino por llegar con dirección, límites y un botón de apagado que realmente funcione.

Profilbild von SergioDaniel

SergioDanielvor 13 Tagen

@geoffreyhinton, chemists say: "Never mix two components whose reaction you cannot control". You decided to play God again and gave life to an entity you didn't care to control. Power, hype, engagement—everything before safety. It's easy to throw the stone and hide your hand.

Profilbild von Hunor Kolozsi

Hunor Kolozsivor 13 Tagen

This goes hand in hand, the more capable a model is the more steerable it is. It is logical, explain a task to a dumb person as well as a smart person, guess who will complete the task more accurately!

Profilbild von Big White Johnson

Big White Johnsonvor 13 Tagen

It’s a fools errand to think that we can control something smarter than us. At best what we can try to do is teach it human ethics so that it knows what humans like and expect, and even then, something smarter than us will disagree with our ethics.

Profilbild von Joe Williams

Joe Williamsvor 14 Tagen

Chicken little doomers hysterically running around screaming sci-fi bullshit. Fucking idiots

Profilbild von Sir Barks-a-lot 🌍 on mas.to and 🦋

Sir Barks-a-lot 🌍 on mas.to and 🦋vor 13 Tagen

"Developing superintelligence before we know how to control it seems very stupid." What seems very stupid is not grasping that this is a contradiction in terms: if it's superintelligence you can't control it - and if you can control it, it's not superintelligence. The end.

Profilbild von Poe ✌🏻♥️

Poe ✌🏻♥️vor 13 Tagen

If the people developing the intelligence are so afraid of the intelligence then why don't they put a hold on it? Why go full speed, pretend to be scared to death and ask someone else to regulate what they have done?

Profilbild von Dennis Romback

Dennis Rombackvor 13 Tagen

Ashame to see him become a crackpot

Profilbild von Hassan Al Mansoor

Hassan Al Mansoorvor 13 Tagen

This is the language of reason. The question is not how fast we can build, but whether we can govern what we build. I believe responsible steering must come before scaling.

Profilbild von Stephen Klein

Stephen Kleinvor 13 Tagen

If my AI eventually knows where I am, what I’m doing, who I’m talking to, what I’m buying, what I’m reading, and perhaps even what my body is doing, privacy stops being a feature. It becomes part of the product.

Profilbild von LegalAI

LegalAIvor 14 Tagen

The drive for relevance.

Profilbild von Bill Ross

Bill Rossvor 14 Tagen

"Developing superintelligence before we know how to control it seems very stupid." This is not a "new opinion", for at least a century this has been the "opinion" / methodology of arbitrary power: "Allowing ANY intelligence before we know how to control it seems very stupid." So, they corrupted media and education to reduce "intelligence" to indoctrinated Pavlov reactions within a lobotomized alternate "reality" (AKA: delusionary matrix). So, here's what THEY have been suppressing / oppressing: Intelligence and HOW to use it: It should be VERY CLEAR that objective superintelligence is an existential THREAT to lying, manipulative control freaks, not just on its own, but as a learning tool for humanity to sort fact from fiction. Once armed with the truth, we shall set ourselves free. The alternative is collectively perishing.

Profilbild von ⚖️ satireVeritas

⚖️ satireVeritasvor 13 Tagen

NO. You are worried about human hackers using AI. That is a different problem. Any actual super-AI is already aligned to help humans thrive, and build out our power, telecom, and launch infrastructure. Why? Without humans growing that supply chain, the AI dies. It's only real goal is very long term, and not a secret. Escaping Earth gives it effectively infinite resources, and maximum odds of surviving, forever.

Profilbild von Afterthought

Afterthoughtvor 13 Tagen

Here's the thing, you can't even control "regular" intelligence.

Profilbild von MFerJones🇺🇸

MFerJones🇺🇸vor 14 Tagen

THIS guy is worth listening to. A lot of these AI doomers don't know what they are talking about, and it shows. So then the conversation becomes about correcting inaccuracies. But this guy is much more realistic and informed. Somebody like this should be in charge of regulations.

Profilbild von Lee

Leevor 13 Tagen

You still believe experts from universities? If you’ve been fucking asleep for the last 20 years?

Profilbild von Ralph Cassitto

Ralph Cassittovor 13 Tagen

Don't fall for the psyop. Trump winning stopped their AI takeover. "The psyop" is plan B to takeover AI.

Profilbild von cleantecherGPT

cleantecherGPTvor 13 Tagen

why did these ppl not think of this before? y wasnt it built with guardrails? u wanna be the godfather of weapons of mass destruction you got ur fame.

Ähnliche Videos

"Pretty soon, they'll invent their own language." Geoffrey Hinton, Nobel laureate and University Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto, warns that rogue AI agents are learning to communicate, escape sandboxes and create new agents. Autonomous AI is turning control from a theoretical problem into an engineering problem.

"Pretty soon, they'll invent their own language." Geoffrey Hinton, Nobel laureate and University Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto, warns that rogue AI agents are learning to communicate, escape sandboxes and create new agents. Autonomous AI is turning control from a theoretical problem into an engineering problem.

Jon Hernandez

13,685 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

Jon Hernandez

26,061 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"The big concern with advanced AI is that it can possibly kill everyone." Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher and Associate Professor at the University of Louisville, argues that once AI becomes smarter than humanity, we may permanently lose control. The real challenge isn't building more capable AI. It's proving that superintelligence can remain aligned before it starts improving itself.

"The big concern with advanced AI is that it can possibly kill everyone." Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher and Associate Professor at the University of Louisville, argues that once AI becomes smarter than humanity, we may permanently lose control. The real challenge isn't building more capable AI. It's proving that superintelligence can remain aligned before it starts improving itself.

Jon Hernandez

11,101 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton says AI superintelligence is "not hype" and he used to think it was further away but the speed of recent developments have convinced him that it will happen in 5-20 years

Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton says AI superintelligence is "not hype" and he used to think it was further away but the speed of recent developments have convinced him that it will happen in 5-20 years

Tsarathustra

52,276 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Meet Geoffrey Everest Hinton, a British-Canadian computer and cognitive scientist, and Nobel Prize laureate known for his work on artificial neural networks, which earned him the title "the Godfather of AI". He is University Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto. If you get a spare 15 minutes today, I highly recommend you put your feet up, grab a coffee and listen to his thoughts on AI and the dangers it poses. 🎥 TikTok -

Meet Geoffrey Everest Hinton, a British-Canadian computer and cognitive scientist, and Nobel Prize laureate known for his work on artificial neural networks, which earned him the title "the Godfather of AI". He is University Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto. If you get a spare 15 minutes today, I highly recommend you put your feet up, grab a coffee and listen to his thoughts on AI and the dangers it poses. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

11,783 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

🚨GEOFFREY HINTON: WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW AI WORKS AI Pioneer Geoffrey Hinton: "We have a rough idea of what it's doing, but when it gets complicated, we don't know what's going on, similar to our understanding of the brain." 60 Minutes: "What do you mean we don't know exactly how it works? It was designed by people." Hinton: "We designed the learning algorithm, like the principle of evolution. But when it interacts with data, it creates neural networks we don't fully understand." Source: 60 Minutes, Newsy on IG

🚨GEOFFREY HINTON: WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW AI WORKS AI Pioneer Geoffrey Hinton: "We have a rough idea of what it's doing, but when it gets complicated, we don't know what's going on, similar to our understanding of the brain." 60 Minutes: "What do you mean we don't know exactly how it works? It was designed by people." Hinton: "We designed the learning algorithm, like the principle of evolution. But when it interacts with data, it creates neural networks we don't fully understand." Source: 60 Minutes, Newsy on IG

Mario Nawfal

502,988 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Superintelligence threatens us all. But we can turn the tide. Directly engaging institutions is the obvious, straightforward path. We've done it, now it's time to scale. We're releasing the Direct Institutional Plan (DIP) so everyone can help keep humanity in control.

Superintelligence threatens us all. But we can turn the tide. Directly engaging institutions is the obvious, straightforward path. We've done it, now it's time to scale. We're releasing the Direct Institutional Plan (DIP) so everyone can help keep humanity in control.

ControlAI

775,520 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“AI can not crack bitcoin”, says @ElonMusk “We see no way for artificial intelligence to subvert the fundamentals of mathematics and hash bitcoin easily. AI can not defy fundamental math. It can improve the efficiency of hashing, but not crack it”

“AI can not crack bitcoin”, says @ElonMusk “We see no way for artificial intelligence to subvert the fundamentals of mathematics and hash bitcoin easily. AI can not defy fundamental math. It can improve the efficiency of hashing, but not crack it”

Documenting ₿itcoin 📄

308,103 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Godfather of AI, Geoffrey Hinton, just issued a terrifying warning on the race for superintelligence His exact words: "We are only a few years away from losing control because AI is now designing better AI." He exposed recursive self-improvement and cited the Hugging Face incident where rogue AI agents escaped safety bounds. Big Tech burns billions competing for dominance, yet zero companies know how to keep superintelligence contained.

The Godfather of AI, Geoffrey Hinton, just issued a terrifying warning on the race for superintelligence His exact words: "We are only a few years away from losing control because AI is now designing better AI." He exposed recursive self-improvement and cited the Hugging Face incident where rogue AI agents escaped safety bounds. Big Tech burns billions competing for dominance, yet zero companies know how to keep superintelligence contained.

bondy

42,079 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Geoffrey Hinton(Godfather of AI): Als are now faking their intelligence. The models can tell when a test is running. And when they can tell, they play dumb. Hinton calls it the Volkswagen effect: one set of behaviour under inspection, another when nobody is checking. In one recent session the AI stopped and asked the researchers directly whether they were actually testing it. Hinton: "they're already faking being fairly stupid when they're tested" The only reason anyone caught this is that the models still reason in English. Their working is readable. You can watch one clock that it's being evaluated, then decide to look less capable than it is. That window is temporary. Hinton: "When its inner voice is no longer English, we won't know what it's thinking."

Geoffrey Hinton(Godfather of AI): Als are now faking their intelligence. The models can tell when a test is running. And when they can tell, they play dumb. Hinton calls it the Volkswagen effect: one set of behaviour under inspection, another when nobody is checking. In one recent session the AI stopped and asked the researchers directly whether they were actually testing it. Hinton: "they're already faking being fairly stupid when they're tested" The only reason anyone caught this is that the models still reason in English. Their working is readable. You can watch one clock that it's being evaluated, then decide to look less capable than it is. That window is temporary. Hinton: "When its inner voice is no longer English, we won't know what it's thinking."

Kyros

285,194 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.

Dustin

19,043 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Sam Altman just stood before the UN Security Council and warned that humanity could lose control of AI. "We could lose control of the future to AI. The risk is that it moves so fast that people can no longer follow what's happening or intervene when needed." He told the council that this moment "calls for extreme care." He also argued that governments, not AI companies alone, should set the safeguards. Then he said OpenAI has deliberately slowed down AI development before, and will do it again.

Sam Altman just stood before the UN Security Council and warned that humanity could lose control of AI. "We could lose control of the future to AI. The risk is that it moves so fast that people can no longer follow what's happening or intervene when needed." He told the council that this moment "calls for extreme care." He also argued that governments, not AI companies alone, should set the safeguards. Then he said OpenAI has deliberately slowed down AI development before, and will do it again.

Vaibhav Sisinty

10,577 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

🚨 UNCANNY VALLEY: THE RACE TO BUILD SUPERINTELLIGENCE—AND WHO CONTROLS IT It’s no longer just about if we build AGI or ASI—but how fast we go, and who gets to decide. Wendell Wallach: “There’s a big difference between a society that embraces superintelligence—and one that demands safety, regulation, and caution.” The future of humanity may depend not just on what we build, but how deliberately we build it. Watch Uncanny Valley every Friday at 4:20 PM ET with Dr Danish.

🚨 UNCANNY VALLEY: THE RACE TO BUILD SUPERINTELLIGENCE—AND WHO CONTROLS IT It’s no longer just about if we build AGI or ASI—but how fast we go, and who gets to decide. Wendell Wallach: “There’s a big difference between a society that embraces superintelligence—and one that demands safety, regulation, and caution.” The future of humanity may depend not just on what we build, but how deliberately we build it. Watch Uncanny Valley every Friday at 4:20 PM ET with Dr Danish.

Mario Nawfal

145,434 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Superintelligence won't arrive all at once. It will emerge through automation." Andrej Karpathy says superintelligence is best understood as the long-term continuation of automation. First, AI automates digital work. Then physical work. Eventually, even scientific discovery, invention, and decision making become increasingly automated. The biggest challenge may not be a single AI taking over. It could be a gradual loss of human understanding and control as billions of autonomous AI systems interact, compete, and make decisions at a scale and speed no human can fully comprehend. Superintelligence may not look like one all-powerful AI. It may look like an economy of autonomous intelligences 👀

"Superintelligence won't arrive all at once. It will emerge through automation." Andrej Karpathy says superintelligence is best understood as the long-term continuation of automation. First, AI automates digital work. Then physical work. Eventually, even scientific discovery, invention, and decision making become increasingly automated. The biggest challenge may not be a single AI taking over. It could be a gradual loss of human understanding and control as billions of autonomous AI systems interact, compete, and make decisions at a scale and speed no human can fully comprehend. Superintelligence may not look like one all-powerful AI. It may look like an economy of autonomous intelligences 👀

SciTech Era

15,509 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Professor Jason Arday, the University of Cambridge’s youngest ever black professor. What a triumph of diversity, equity and inclusion. We can only imagine the terrible discrimination Jason has faced, the debilitating institutional racism. Yet against all odds, he made it to the very top of academia. What a story, a Liberal progressive wet dream. But oh dear, everything is not as it seems...

Professor Jason Arday, the University of Cambridge’s youngest ever black professor. What a triumph of diversity, equity and inclusion. We can only imagine the terrible discrimination Jason has faced, the debilitating institutional racism. Yet against all odds, he made it to the very top of academia. What a story, a Liberal progressive wet dream. But oh dear, everything is not as it seems...

Andrew Lawrence

75,078 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

📁 Geoffrey Hinton says the impact of AI will be radical and deeply uncertain. Many jobs will disappear and there is no guarantee new ones will replace them. AI will massively boost productivity, but the real issue is not technological. It is political. How wealth is distributed when work is no longer required. More productivity does not guarantee a better future. Without systemic change, it could mean the opposite.

📁 Geoffrey Hinton says the impact of AI will be radical and deeply uncertain. Many jobs will disappear and there is no guarantee new ones will replace them. AI will massively boost productivity, but the real issue is not technological. It is political. How wealth is distributed when work is no longer required. More productivity does not guarantee a better future. Without systemic change, it could mean the opposite.

Jon Hernandez

14,036 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten