Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Sam Altman just stood before the UN Security Council and warned that humanity could lose control of AI. "We could lose control of the future to AI. The risk is that it moves so fast that people can no longer follow what's happening or intervene when needed." He told...

10,577 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля waterr
waterr3 дней назад

This is so he can call for regulation that gives his company the advantage. New competitors will face challenges and won't be able to compete with already established companies.

Фото профиля ◉●○•°
◉●○•°3 дней назад

@stephwakefield_

Фото профиля Varshith N Neelakanti
Varshith N Neelakanti2 дней назад

then we need to build a stronger protocols through it

Фото профиля AKHIL
AKHIL2 дней назад

Fear mongering

Фото профиля Alok
Alok2 дней назад

He is the same guy turned non profit into for profit. Elon musk has made open ai for some reason .

Фото профиля Mr Toad 🐸
Mr Toad 🐸2 дней назад

Any thing wrong can he just simply turn off the datacenter ? Otherwise existing law should be sufficient to put him in jail if his model committed serious crimes

Фото профиля rishabh
rishabh3 дней назад

That distinction—governments, not labs, set safeguards—is the line worth pressing. If labs can pause voluntarily, they can also publish the measurable triggers, eval results, and incident thresholds that let the public verify a pause is real.

Фото профиля Vaibhav Sisinty
Vaibhav Sisinty2 дней назад

I share tools & Information like this daily in our free AI WhatsApp community. 200,000+ people already in. Join for free :

Фото профиля DesignSubway
DesignSubway2 дней назад

AI is moving incredibly fast, and conversations like this matter. Innovation is exciting, but building responsibly with thoughtful safeguards will be just as important as what comes next.

Фото профиля JT Maher, attorney,
JT Maher, attorney,3 дней назад

. . . Therefore give me more funding to pretend to control what I already accepted funding to develop. Or else. The long con fleeces the mark coming and going and makes them think you did them a favor.

Фото профиля Fabien Snauwaert
Fabien Snauwaert2 дней назад

has the UN heard of oligopolies?

Похожие видео

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,208 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад