Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

DNA expert from ATF testifying: Trigger and Trigger guard had DNA from multiple people. Tyler Robinson's DNA was the most degraded. Thanks to Candace Owens for publishing these videos that the media and the Zionist influencers ignore.

32,708 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨Watch Candace Owens cherry-pick and mischaracterise the testimony of the ATF's DNA expert - CUTTING AWAY before her audience sees the parts that completely undermine her narrative. Candace wants her audience to believe that because the DNA profile attributed to Tyler Robinson as the major contributor showed signs of degradation, that must mean the DNA was old - and therefore couldn't belong to the shooter. The problem? That's not what either DNA expert testified. In fact, moments after the cherry-picked clip Candace used, the ATF expert confirms she cannot determine when the DNA was deposited on the trigger or trigger guard. And just two days earlier, the FBI's DNA expert explained that degradation can result from many factors, such as, heat, humidity, cleaning, and other environmental factors, adding: "I really can't tell why an item is degraded." -The ATF expert did not testify that degradation meant the DNA was old -She did not testify it made the DNA unusable -She did not testify that it was inconsistent with the shooter That's Candace's conclusion - not the expert's testimony. And despite the degradation, the ATF expert still testified that the DNA profile was at least one trillion times more likely if it originated from Tyler Robinson as the major contributor than from four unknown unrelated individuals. That's exactly where Candace cuts away. It's another example of taking one sentence from an expert, stripping away the context, and presenting a conclusion the witness never reached. An honest investigator follows the evidence wherever it leads. Candace takes whatever evidence supports her predetermined narrative, distorts it - and hides the rest. The opposite of someone trying to find the truth.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

68,556 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,453 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.

Julie Carpenter

10,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr