Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 Do you understand what SCAM ALTMAN has been doing? He made a crypto called Worldcoin that scans your eyeballs with a metal orb in exchange for tokens. The token hit $11.74 in 2024. Today $WLD is $0.28. Down 97%. His foundation dumped $65 million worth last week at...

EvanLuthra's profile picture

Evan Luthra

396,982 subscribers

823,903 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & TechnologieFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk
0:31

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

Eric Daugherty

701,915 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow
2:06

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow

Wall Street Apes

19,516 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.
5:28

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.

West Lord

4,438,811 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

🚨 BOOM! ELON MUSK TORCHES SAM ALTMAN AND OPENAI IN COURT! Elon is wrapping up his testimony today. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit to benefit humanity… and now he’s exposing how they completely betrayed that mission. Musk dropped the hammer: He feels like a “fool” for donating $38 million that helped build this now $800 billion monster — all while they ditched the nonprofit promise and went full profit-driven. Classic Silicon Valley betrayal.
0:28

🚨 BOOM! ELON MUSK TORCHES SAM ALTMAN AND OPENAI IN COURT! Elon is wrapping up his testimony today. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit to benefit humanity… and now he’s exposing how they completely betrayed that mission. Musk dropped the hammer: He feels like a “fool” for donating $38 million that helped build this now $800 billion monster — all while they ditched the nonprofit promise and went full profit-driven. Classic Silicon Valley betrayal.

Gunther Eagleman™

89,694 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The two most powerful men in AI are in a courtroom right now here’s everything you need to know: 2015: musk and altman co-found OpenAI promise: nonprofit. for humanity. forever. musk invested $38 million 2018: musk tries to take control. altman says no. musk leaves. 2026: OpenAI valued at $852 billion. IPO coming. musk: “scam altman stole a charity. full stop.” altman: “christmas in april 🎄” opening statements happening right now in oakland altman. brockman. satya nadella. all testifying. the judge already told them to stop posting on x this morning they didn’t listen 26 claims. dropped to 2 the future of the most powerful AI company ever built decided by 9 jurors in oakland I’ll be watching
3:11

The two most powerful men in AI are in a courtroom right now here’s everything you need to know: 2015: musk and altman co-found OpenAI promise: nonprofit. for humanity. forever. musk invested $38 million 2018: musk tries to take control. altman says no. musk leaves. 2026: OpenAI valued at $852 billion. IPO coming. musk: “scam altman stole a charity. full stop.” altman: “christmas in april 🎄” opening statements happening right now in oakland altman. brockman. satya nadella. all testifying. the judge already told them to stop posting on x this morning they didn’t listen 26 claims. dropped to 2 the future of the most powerful AI company ever built decided by 9 jurors in oakland I’ll be watching

Mika

22,010 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk is on the witness stand in Oakland right now telling a jury how Sam Altman stole a charity. Not a company. Not a venture. A charity. The founding documents are entered into evidence. It started with a conversation. Google co-founder Larry Page called Musk a “speciesist” for favoring humanity over computers. At his own birthday party. In front of a crowd. One of the most powerful technologists on the planet told the man beside him that caring more about human survival than machines was a character flaw. Musk walked away from that conversation and asked one question. What is the exact opposite of Google? Musk: “It would be an open-source non-profit. And that is where the word ‘open’ in OpenAI comes from.” He funded it. Named it. Recruited the researchers. Brought in Ilya Sutskever. Personally brokered the original Microsoft Azure deal with Satya Nadella. Musk: “I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, taught them everything I know, provided all the initial funding.” $38 million of his own money. Into a structure designed to prevent any single person from profiting off the most dangerous technology ever built. The founding charter is now sitting in front of a federal jury. It says OpenAI was created to build “open source technology for the public benefit” and was “not organized for the private gain of any person.” Then they offered Musk shares. He turned them down. Musk: “Non-profits are not supposed to have shares. It did not seem morally or legally defensible.” The man who built it refused the money because the mission was never supposed to make anyone rich. Then something changed. Sam Altman took that structure and converted it into a for-profit subsidiary. Attracted a $10 billion Microsoft investment. And built what is now approaching a trillion-dollar company on top of $38 million in charitable donations. When Musk found out about the Microsoft deal, he texted Altman directly. Musk: “I said, ‘What the hell is going on?’ I think I said, ‘This is a bait and switch.’” The media frames this as a billionaire grudge match. Two egos fighting over territory. That framing is a lie designed to make you look away from the documents. This is not a dispute over equity. Musk is not asking for money back. He is asking the court to return every dollar to the nonprofit foundation. $130 billion in damages. Altman and Brockman removed from their positions. The entire for-profit conversion unwound. He wants the charity restored because it was never supposed to be anything else. Then from the stand, one line. Musk: “I was a fool. I gave them free funding to create a startup.” $38 million donated to protect the species. Turned into an $800 billion vehicle for private enrichment. The most sophisticated theft of charitable intent in American corporate history. And if this conversion stands, it sets the precedent for every nonprofit that comes after it. Every donor who writes a check believing a charter means something. Every mission statement drafted to protect the public instead of enrich the founders. If you can collect tax-exempt donations, build the most valuable technology on Earth, and hand the returns to private shareholders, then the nonprofit structure is not a safeguard. It is a startup incubator for anyone willing to rewrite the paperwork. And the question no one in that courtroom is asking. If the people handed the tools to protect humanity used them to enrich themselves instead, what does that tell you about what happens when the technology actually arrives? The charter said for the benefit of all. The cap table says for the benefit of Sam Altman.
1:50

Elon Musk is on the witness stand in Oakland right now telling a jury how Sam Altman stole a charity. Not a company. Not a venture. A charity. The founding documents are entered into evidence. It started with a conversation. Google co-founder Larry Page called Musk a “speciesist” for favoring humanity over computers. At his own birthday party. In front of a crowd. One of the most powerful technologists on the planet told the man beside him that caring more about human survival than machines was a character flaw. Musk walked away from that conversation and asked one question. What is the exact opposite of Google? Musk: “It would be an open-source non-profit. And that is where the word ‘open’ in OpenAI comes from.” He funded it. Named it. Recruited the researchers. Brought in Ilya Sutskever. Personally brokered the original Microsoft Azure deal with Satya Nadella. Musk: “I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, taught them everything I know, provided all the initial funding.” $38 million of his own money. Into a structure designed to prevent any single person from profiting off the most dangerous technology ever built. The founding charter is now sitting in front of a federal jury. It says OpenAI was created to build “open source technology for the public benefit” and was “not organized for the private gain of any person.” Then they offered Musk shares. He turned them down. Musk: “Non-profits are not supposed to have shares. It did not seem morally or legally defensible.” The man who built it refused the money because the mission was never supposed to make anyone rich. Then something changed. Sam Altman took that structure and converted it into a for-profit subsidiary. Attracted a $10 billion Microsoft investment. And built what is now approaching a trillion-dollar company on top of $38 million in charitable donations. When Musk found out about the Microsoft deal, he texted Altman directly. Musk: “I said, ‘What the hell is going on?’ I think I said, ‘This is a bait and switch.’” The media frames this as a billionaire grudge match. Two egos fighting over territory. That framing is a lie designed to make you look away from the documents. This is not a dispute over equity. Musk is not asking for money back. He is asking the court to return every dollar to the nonprofit foundation. $130 billion in damages. Altman and Brockman removed from their positions. The entire for-profit conversion unwound. He wants the charity restored because it was never supposed to be anything else. Then from the stand, one line. Musk: “I was a fool. I gave them free funding to create a startup.” $38 million donated to protect the species. Turned into an $800 billion vehicle for private enrichment. The most sophisticated theft of charitable intent in American corporate history. And if this conversion stands, it sets the precedent for every nonprofit that comes after it. Every donor who writes a check believing a charter means something. Every mission statement drafted to protect the public instead of enrich the founders. If you can collect tax-exempt donations, build the most valuable technology on Earth, and hand the returns to private shareholders, then the nonprofit structure is not a safeguard. It is a startup incubator for anyone willing to rewrite the paperwork. And the question no one in that courtroom is asking. If the people handed the tools to protect humanity used them to enrich themselves instead, what does that tell you about what happens when the technology actually arrives? The charter said for the benefit of all. The cap table says for the benefit of Sam Altman.

Dustin

58,389 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon is suing OpenAI for $150 billion. On the stand today he said: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." OpenAI went from a nonprofit in someone's apartment to an $850 billion company. The people who built it are now billionaires. The charity that was supposed to own it holds 26%. It doesn't matter if you think Elon Musk is a hypocrite or a hero. That math is hard to explain. Source: Reuters
2:43

Elon is suing OpenAI for $150 billion. On the stand today he said: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." OpenAI went from a nonprofit in someone's apartment to an $850 billion company. The people who built it are now billionaires. The charity that was supposed to own it holds 26%. It doesn't matter if you think Elon Musk is a hypocrite or a hero. That math is hard to explain. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

465,536 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the middle. 🤨 Back in 2015, Musk and Altman built OpenAI as a nonprofit, a lab to build AI safely before Google could lock it down. Musk put in $38 million. Altman turned OpenAI into a for-profit company. Apple's claim: OpenAI stole its secrets to build it. OpenAI's hardware boss, Tang Tan, a former Apple VP, allegedly told job candidates still at Apple to bring "actual parts," like batteries and logic boards, for "show and tell." Is his empire standing on stolen ground? 🤔 Tell us what you think, and subscribe Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more.
2:40

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the middle. 🤨 Back in 2015, Musk and Altman built OpenAI as a nonprofit, a lab to build AI safely before Google could lock it down. Musk put in $38 million. Altman turned OpenAI into a for-profit company. Apple's claim: OpenAI stole its secrets to build it. OpenAI's hardware boss, Tang Tan, a former Apple VP, allegedly told job candidates still at Apple to bring "actual parts," like batteries and logic boards, for "show and tell." Is his empire standing on stolen ground? 🤔 Tell us what you think, and subscribe Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

578,395 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Elon Musk has just Sued OpenAI, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman over them moving away from being Open Source. Musk States: "OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity." Musk's Claims include: - Breach of contract - Breach of fiduciary duty - Unfair business practices He is requesting that OpenAI 'revert back to open source' and that they do not profit off of their AGI technology. As much as some people attack Musk on issues, I can't help but see this as a positive move for humanity in general. Keep in mind that Musk donated $44 million of his money to OpenAI with their original "founding agreement" in mind. Whether the courts agree with is another story but it will be interesting to follow.
0:43

Elon Musk has just Sued OpenAI, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman over them moving away from being Open Source. Musk States: "OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity." Musk's Claims include: - Breach of contract - Breach of fiduciary duty - Unfair business practices He is requesting that OpenAI 'revert back to open source' and that they do not profit off of their AGI technology. As much as some people attack Musk on issues, I can't help but see this as a positive move for humanity in general. Keep in mind that Musk donated $44 million of his money to OpenAI with their original "founding agreement" in mind. Whether the courts agree with is another story but it will be interesting to follow.

Ed Krassenstein

260,511 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 Elon Musk testified today that AI could surpass human intelligence next year and could kill us. And the person in charge of it is not trustworthy. Elon Musk in the trial: "I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, and provided all the initial funding. I could have started it as a for-profit and I chose not to." "If we make it OK to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." "This technology could also kill us all." "If you have someone who is not very trustworthy in charge of AI, that is very dangerous for the whole world." The judge threatened a gag order after Musk spent Monday night calling Altman "Scam Altman" on X. While Musk was on the stand, Altman was not in the courtroom, he was doing a virtual appearance at an AWS conference. If Musk wins, OpenAI's IPO is dead. If he loses, Altman walks away with a $10 billion equity stake built on someone else's $44 million charitable donation.
1:19

🚨 Elon Musk testified today that AI could surpass human intelligence next year and could kill us. And the person in charge of it is not trustworthy. Elon Musk in the trial: "I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, and provided all the initial funding. I could have started it as a for-profit and I chose not to." "If we make it OK to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." "This technology could also kill us all." "If you have someone who is not very trustworthy in charge of AI, that is very dangerous for the whole world." The judge threatened a gag order after Musk spent Monday night calling Altman "Scam Altman" on X. While Musk was on the stand, Altman was not in the courtroom, he was doing a virtual appearance at an AWS conference. If Musk wins, OpenAI's IPO is dead. If he loses, Altman walks away with a $10 billion equity stake built on someone else's $44 million charitable donation.

Bull Theory

740,357 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Musk vs. Altman OpenAI Trial: Jury Deliberations Begin Today The high-stakes federal trial in Oakland reached a major milestone today, May 18, 2026. After weeks of dramatic testimony and closing arguments last week, the 9-person jury officially begins deliberations in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk accuses them of betraying OpenAI’s original nonprofit mission by turning it into a massive for-profit company (now valued at over $850 billion). He’s seeking billions in damages. The jury’s verdict is advisory — Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final call. Verdict watch is officially on. How do you predict this one ends? (Video: AI)
0:20

Musk vs. Altman OpenAI Trial: Jury Deliberations Begin Today The high-stakes federal trial in Oakland reached a major milestone today, May 18, 2026. After weeks of dramatic testimony and closing arguments last week, the 9-person jury officially begins deliberations in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk accuses them of betraying OpenAI’s original nonprofit mission by turning it into a massive for-profit company (now valued at over $850 billion). He’s seeking billions in damages. The jury’s verdict is advisory — Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final call. Verdict watch is officially on. How do you predict this one ends? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

37,655 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: Let's say you fund a non-profit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead they chop down trees to sell the wood. That's OpenAI. “I came up with the name OpenAI as an open source and as a nonprofit and I funded OpenAI for the first roughly $50 million. And it was intended to be a nonprofit open-source company. And now, they're trying to change that for their own financial benefit into a for-profit company that is closed source. So this would be like, let's say you funded a non-profit to help preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the wood. You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's OpenAI.” Interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, May 20, 2025
0:38

Elon Musk: Let's say you fund a non-profit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead they chop down trees to sell the wood. That's OpenAI. “I came up with the name OpenAI as an open source and as a nonprofit and I funded OpenAI for the first roughly $50 million. And it was intended to be a nonprofit open-source company. And now, they're trying to change that for their own financial benefit into a for-profit company that is closed source. So this would be like, let's say you funded a non-profit to help preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the wood. You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's OpenAI.” Interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, May 20, 2025

ELON CLIPS

22,370 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

OpenAI entered 2026 with the most insane revenue targets in corporate history. $30 billion in sales. Up from $13 billion in 2025. While LOSING $14 billion doing it. Let's understand this: OpenAI needed to convert from nonprofit to for-profit by December 31st, 2025 to unlock their $40 billion SoftBank funding. Miss that deadline? The round drops to $20 billion. And they made it. But here's the thing: The nonprofit STILL controls everything. They spent an entire year fighting to become for-profit, got sued by Elon Musk, pissed off California's attorney general, lost key employees over it. Then ended up basically right where they started. Except now the nonprofit has a $130 billion stake and Microsoft got $135 billion for 27% ownership. So OpenAI burned a year of political capital to give away $265 billion in equity while keeping the same power structure that almost destroyed them in 2023. The revenue math is absolutely deranged: To hit $30 billion in 2026, they need to more than double revenue in 12 months. No company in history has done this from a $13 billion base. Not even Nvidia. Not even ByteDance. OpenAI wants to go from $10B to $100B in 3 years. And the losses are worse: $14 billion in losses in 2026. Triple their 2025 burn. They've committed to: - $250 billion to Microsoft Azure - $38 billion to Amazon AWS - $1+ trillion in chip deals with Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom They won't be profitable until 2029. Maybe. But here's the part that makes this whole thing insane... They're not just competing anymore. Anthropic: Fully for-profit. On track for $15 billion revenue in 2026. AI insiders surveyed in December said they'd invest in Anthropic over OpenAI. Meta's pouring billions into Llama. Chinese models eating market share. And OpenAI still has to answer to a nonprofit board that can shut down AGI research whenever they decide it's not "benefiting humanity." The same board that fired Sam Altman in November 2023. The investors know this. That's why the $40B was contingent on conversion. When OpenAI reversed course and kept nonprofit control, they had to give the nonprofit a $130B stake. Basically: "You can keep control, but you better make us whole." What happens if they miss targets? The Azure commitment becomes a liability. The AWS deal gets renegotiated. The nonprofit board starts asking why they're burning billions while people die of preventable diseases. Investors start wondering if that $300B valuation was justified. OpenAI is betting they can: 1. More than double revenue annually for 3 years straight 2. Burn $44 billion doing it 3. Keep a nonprofit board happy 4. Fend off Anthropic, Meta, and Chinese competitors 5. Avoid another Sam Altman situation 6. Actually build AGI 7. Convince everyone it was worth it Nobody in history has pulled this off. We're 1 day into 2026. By December 31st, we'll know if OpenAI is the most ambitious company ever built or the biggest AI bubble in history. What are you betting on?
1:28

OpenAI entered 2026 with the most insane revenue targets in corporate history. $30 billion in sales. Up from $13 billion in 2025. While LOSING $14 billion doing it. Let's understand this: OpenAI needed to convert from nonprofit to for-profit by December 31st, 2025 to unlock their $40 billion SoftBank funding. Miss that deadline? The round drops to $20 billion. And they made it. But here's the thing: The nonprofit STILL controls everything. They spent an entire year fighting to become for-profit, got sued by Elon Musk, pissed off California's attorney general, lost key employees over it. Then ended up basically right where they started. Except now the nonprofit has a $130 billion stake and Microsoft got $135 billion for 27% ownership. So OpenAI burned a year of political capital to give away $265 billion in equity while keeping the same power structure that almost destroyed them in 2023. The revenue math is absolutely deranged: To hit $30 billion in 2026, they need to more than double revenue in 12 months. No company in history has done this from a $13 billion base. Not even Nvidia. Not even ByteDance. OpenAI wants to go from $10B to $100B in 3 years. And the losses are worse: $14 billion in losses in 2026. Triple their 2025 burn. They've committed to: - $250 billion to Microsoft Azure - $38 billion to Amazon AWS - $1+ trillion in chip deals with Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom They won't be profitable until 2029. Maybe. But here's the part that makes this whole thing insane... They're not just competing anymore. Anthropic: Fully for-profit. On track for $15 billion revenue in 2026. AI insiders surveyed in December said they'd invest in Anthropic over OpenAI. Meta's pouring billions into Llama. Chinese models eating market share. And OpenAI still has to answer to a nonprofit board that can shut down AGI research whenever they decide it's not "benefiting humanity." The same board that fired Sam Altman in November 2023. The investors know this. That's why the $40B was contingent on conversion. When OpenAI reversed course and kept nonprofit control, they had to give the nonprofit a $130B stake. Basically: "You can keep control, but you better make us whole." What happens if they miss targets? The Azure commitment becomes a liability. The AWS deal gets renegotiated. The nonprofit board starts asking why they're burning billions while people die of preventable diseases. Investors start wondering if that $300B valuation was justified. OpenAI is betting they can: 1. More than double revenue annually for 3 years straight 2. Burn $44 billion doing it 3. Keep a nonprofit board happy 4. Fend off Anthropic, Meta, and Chinese competitors 5. Avoid another Sam Altman situation 6. Actually build AGI 7. Convince everyone it was worth it Nobody in history has pulled this off. We're 1 day into 2026. By December 31st, we'll know if OpenAI is the most ambitious company ever built or the biggest AI bubble in history. What are you betting on?

Ricardo

97,607 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.
1:28

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

Ricardo

27,878,340 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk is 100% right to take OpenAI to court. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit specifically to develop AGI for the benefit of all humanity — not to enrich any individual or corporation. He came up with the name, recruited the team, taught them what he knew, and put in ~$38 million of the earliest funding when no one else would. He chose a charity structure deliberately because he could have made it a for-profit from day one and didn’t. Yes, Musk left the board in 2018 after disagreements (including over control and structure). And yes, there were internal talks about a for-profit arm even back then — but only if the nonprofit stayed firmly in charge and the mission came first. The “tail doesn’t wag the dog.” What actually happened? After he stepped away, OpenAI did the exact opposite: created a capped-profit subsidiary, took massive Microsoft money, went fully closed-source, and is now racing toward a $1T+ IPO. They rebranded “Open” into one of the most closed, profit-driven AI companies on Earth while keeping the original nonprofit shell for optics. Musk isn’t suing for personal profit — he’s asking the court to return any wrongful gains to OpenAI’s charitable arm, revert the company to its nonprofit roots, and remove Altman and Brockman from leadership. That’s not “sour grapes.” That’s enforcing the promise the public was sold. In an age where AGI could shape humanity’s entire future, the original mission still matters. Elon is the only one still fighting to protect it instead of cashing out. Principle over profit. Humanity over hype.
3:32

Elon Musk is 100% right to take OpenAI to court. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit specifically to develop AGI for the benefit of all humanity — not to enrich any individual or corporation. He came up with the name, recruited the team, taught them what he knew, and put in ~$38 million of the earliest funding when no one else would. He chose a charity structure deliberately because he could have made it a for-profit from day one and didn’t. Yes, Musk left the board in 2018 after disagreements (including over control and structure). And yes, there were internal talks about a for-profit arm even back then — but only if the nonprofit stayed firmly in charge and the mission came first. The “tail doesn’t wag the dog.” What actually happened? After he stepped away, OpenAI did the exact opposite: created a capped-profit subsidiary, took massive Microsoft money, went fully closed-source, and is now racing toward a $1T+ IPO. They rebranded “Open” into one of the most closed, profit-driven AI companies on Earth while keeping the original nonprofit shell for optics. Musk isn’t suing for personal profit — he’s asking the court to return any wrongful gains to OpenAI’s charitable arm, revert the company to its nonprofit roots, and remove Altman and Brockman from leadership. That’s not “sour grapes.” That’s enforcing the promise the public was sold. In an age where AGI could shape humanity’s entire future, the original mission still matters. Elon is the only one still fighting to protect it instead of cashing out. Principle over profit. Humanity over hype.

Captain Eli

18,983 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The trial of the decade has officially started: Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk is seeking 150 billion in damages, accusing OpenAI of unjust enrichment and flipping a nonprofit into a for-profit. He is demanding that the company revert to a nonprofit and that Altman and Brockman be removed. During the proceedings, Musk leveled up the discussion, stating: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed. That's my concern." However, the most eye-opening revelations came from excerpts of Greg Brockman's personal diary. As discussed by Jason Calacanis, Brockman heavily documented their internal strategy regarding the company's structure and Musk's involvement. The diary excerpts read on the podcast include: "We truly want the B Corp. The true answer is that we want Elon out. "If 3 months later we're doing B Corp, then it was a lie." "Can't see us turning this into a for-profit without a nasty fight. "This story will correctly be that we weren't honest with him. In the end, it's still about wanting a for-profit, just without him." The panel was left stunned by the existence of this detailed paper trail. David Friedberg questioned why anyone would document these plans so explicitly without ever deleting the records. David Sacks summarized the situation perfectly, calling Brockman's diary keeping "discovery maxxing" and "smoking gun maxxing."
1:51

The trial of the decade has officially started: Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk is seeking 150 billion in damages, accusing OpenAI of unjust enrichment and flipping a nonprofit into a for-profit. He is demanding that the company revert to a nonprofit and that Altman and Brockman be removed. During the proceedings, Musk leveled up the discussion, stating: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed. That's my concern." However, the most eye-opening revelations came from excerpts of Greg Brockman's personal diary. As discussed by Jason Calacanis, Brockman heavily documented their internal strategy regarding the company's structure and Musk's involvement. The diary excerpts read on the podcast include: "We truly want the B Corp. The true answer is that we want Elon out. "If 3 months later we're doing B Corp, then it was a lie." "Can't see us turning this into a for-profit without a nasty fight. "This story will correctly be that we weren't honest with him. In the end, it's still about wanting a for-profit, just without him." The panel was left stunned by the existence of this detailed paper trail. David Friedberg questioned why anyone would document these plans so explicitly without ever deleting the records. David Sacks summarized the situation perfectly, calling Brockman's diary keeping "discovery maxxing" and "smoking gun maxxing."

Ian Miles Cheong

16,626 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

FORMER GOOGLE EXEC EXPOSES OPENAI'S BETRAYAL: "FOLLOW THE MONEY" Mo Gawdat torches Sam Altman's humanitarian facade. The ex-Google executive revealed what insiders already knew: OpenAI ditched saving humanity for hundred-billion dollar valuations. "Saving humanity doesn't come at a billion dollar valuation," Gawdat said, confirming top safety engineers fled when OpenAI abandoned its non-profit mission. They saw the writing on the wall. His brutal assessment of Altman's real motivations: "The ego of being the person that invented AGI, the position of power, the meetings with heads of states, the admiration... It is intoxicating." Gawdat's advice: Don't listen to what they say. Ask why they're saying it. What's in it for them? For Altman? Hundreds of billions in valuation and the intoxication of playing god. Source: The Diary of a CEO Elon Musk
5:31

FORMER GOOGLE EXEC EXPOSES OPENAI'S BETRAYAL: "FOLLOW THE MONEY" Mo Gawdat torches Sam Altman's humanitarian facade. The ex-Google executive revealed what insiders already knew: OpenAI ditched saving humanity for hundred-billion dollar valuations. "Saving humanity doesn't come at a billion dollar valuation," Gawdat said, confirming top safety engineers fled when OpenAI abandoned its non-profit mission. They saw the writing on the wall. His brutal assessment of Altman's real motivations: "The ego of being the person that invented AGI, the position of power, the meetings with heads of states, the admiration... It is intoxicating." Gawdat's advice: Don't listen to what they say. Ask why they're saying it. What's in it for them? For Altman? Hundreds of billions in valuation and the intoxication of playing god. Source: The Diary of a CEO Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

439,867 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

“Let’s say you funded an organization to save the Amazon rainforest, and instead, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest, and sold it for profit.” This is the metaphor Elon used to described what happened to OpenAI and why he decided to sue them. From day one, Musk championed rigorous AI safety and systems aligned with human consciousness, not blind optimization or raw profit. He repeatedly warned that commercial incentives could spawn irreversible dangers. After supplying major funding and drawing elite talent, Musk argues OpenAI ditched its founding charter: an open-source, nonprofit counterweight to Google. It became a closed-source, profit-chasing entity tightly bound to Microsoft. In his eyes, the shift was outright betrayal, a direct violation of the organization’s original promise.
4:19

“Let’s say you funded an organization to save the Amazon rainforest, and instead, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest, and sold it for profit.” This is the metaphor Elon used to described what happened to OpenAI and why he decided to sue them. From day one, Musk championed rigorous AI safety and systems aligned with human consciousness, not blind optimization or raw profit. He repeatedly warned that commercial incentives could spawn irreversible dangers. After supplying major funding and drawing elite talent, Musk argues OpenAI ditched its founding charter: an open-source, nonprofit counterweight to Google. It became a closed-source, profit-chasing entity tightly bound to Microsoft. In his eyes, the shift was outright betrayal, a direct violation of the organization’s original promise.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

34,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: A jury just found Elon Musk guilty of fraud. On Friday, a San Francisco jury ruled that Elon Musk deliberately misled Twitter investors in 2022 to drive down the stock price before buying the company. Damages: up to $2.6 billion. The plaintiffs' lawyers called it the largest securities jury verdict in US history. Here's what actually happened: In April 2022, Musk agreed to buy Twitter for $44 billion. $54.20 per share. Deal locked. But then Tesla's stock started falling. Musk had planned to fund the purchase by selling Tesla shares. The more Tesla fell, the more shares he'd have to sell. So he needed a way out. On May 13, 2022, he posted two words: "Deal temporarily on hold." His stated reason? Concerns about fake accounts and bots on the platform. Twitter's stock crashed nearly 10% in a single session. Millions of shareholders panicked and sold. They sold based on what the world's most powerful tweeter had just told them. Then something interesting happened. Musk bought Twitter anyway. At the exact same price he originally agreed to. $54.20 per share. Every single person who sold during those weeks between his tweets and the closing of the deal? They sold at an artificially deflated price. Caused by his words. And the jury agreed. "If you move the market with your words, you own the consequences," said one attorney following the verdict. "When one person can move billions with a tweet, the law has to catch up." Now here's the number that should make you stop. The damages: $2.6 billion. Musk's net worth: $839 billion. The jury's verdict is being called the largest securities jury verdict in American history. Musk himself called it "a bump in the road." And he has a point. His legal team noted the jury found both for and against the plaintiffs. The jury did NOT find that Musk ran a deliberate scheme to defraud investors. They found two specific tweets were misleading. That's it. And on the key question of whether this was a coordinated fraud? Not guilty. Musk's lawyers are already appealing. They pointed to separate cases in Texas and Delaware where Musk recently won appeals. His argument throughout the trial was straightforward: Twitter's own leadership lied to him about how many accounts on the platform were fake. He had every right to pause a $44 billion deal until he got honest answers. The jury disagreed on the tweets. But they agreed it was not a fraud scheme. That distinction matters. The case now moves to the damages phase and then almost certainly years of appeals. In the meantime, Musk is still worth $839 billion. Still the richest person in history. Still building rockets, running AI companies, and reshaping American government. A $2.6 billion verdict and he doesn't miss a step. That's either what justice looks like at this scale. Or it's the most expensive bump in the road anyone has ever driven over. What are your thoughts?
2:58

BREAKING: A jury just found Elon Musk guilty of fraud. On Friday, a San Francisco jury ruled that Elon Musk deliberately misled Twitter investors in 2022 to drive down the stock price before buying the company. Damages: up to $2.6 billion. The plaintiffs' lawyers called it the largest securities jury verdict in US history. Here's what actually happened: In April 2022, Musk agreed to buy Twitter for $44 billion. $54.20 per share. Deal locked. But then Tesla's stock started falling. Musk had planned to fund the purchase by selling Tesla shares. The more Tesla fell, the more shares he'd have to sell. So he needed a way out. On May 13, 2022, he posted two words: "Deal temporarily on hold." His stated reason? Concerns about fake accounts and bots on the platform. Twitter's stock crashed nearly 10% in a single session. Millions of shareholders panicked and sold. They sold based on what the world's most powerful tweeter had just told them. Then something interesting happened. Musk bought Twitter anyway. At the exact same price he originally agreed to. $54.20 per share. Every single person who sold during those weeks between his tweets and the closing of the deal? They sold at an artificially deflated price. Caused by his words. And the jury agreed. "If you move the market with your words, you own the consequences," said one attorney following the verdict. "When one person can move billions with a tweet, the law has to catch up." Now here's the number that should make you stop. The damages: $2.6 billion. Musk's net worth: $839 billion. The jury's verdict is being called the largest securities jury verdict in American history. Musk himself called it "a bump in the road." And he has a point. His legal team noted the jury found both for and against the plaintiffs. The jury did NOT find that Musk ran a deliberate scheme to defraud investors. They found two specific tweets were misleading. That's it. And on the key question of whether this was a coordinated fraud? Not guilty. Musk's lawyers are already appealing. They pointed to separate cases in Texas and Delaware where Musk recently won appeals. His argument throughout the trial was straightforward: Twitter's own leadership lied to him about how many accounts on the platform were fake. He had every right to pause a $44 billion deal until he got honest answers. The jury disagreed on the tweets. But they agreed it was not a fraud scheme. That distinction matters. The case now moves to the damages phase and then almost certainly years of appeals. In the meantime, Musk is still worth $839 billion. Still the richest person in history. Still building rockets, running AI companies, and reshaping American government. A $2.6 billion verdict and he doesn't miss a step. That's either what justice looks like at this scale. Or it's the most expensive bump in the road anyone has ever driven over. What are your thoughts?

Surmount

25,312 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten