Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

During my second session with AHPRA, I asked their representatives about their neutrality, bureaucratic overreach and entanglement with radical ideological and political advocacy groups. When I asked whether AHPRA caseworkers even possess the basic competence to distinguish between a psychoanalytic view of psychosis and a genuine psychotic disorder, or...

MRobertsQLD's profile picture

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

168,282 subscribers

21,819 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I questioned representatives from AHPRA regarding their heavy-handed and unjustified actions against Dr Amos, an academic psychiatrist from North Queensland. On 26 February 2026, the Medical Board of Australia slapped immediate restrictions on Dr Amos's medical registration, banning him from patient contact and social media commentary on gender. This move was triggered by just four complaints (three were anonymous and none were from patients) concerning three X posts — one questioning whether trans identification can be differentiated from psychosis and another using biological pronouns during an exchange. When I pressed Mr Untersteiner on what specific parts of those posts allegedly posed a "serious risk to public health and safety" to justify an immediate action order, he hid behind confidentiality provisions and refused to discuss individual cases. Even with support from Senator Henderson challenging their secrecy, the agency repeatedly dodged direct questions. When I asked Dr Orchard whether a health practitioner has the right to refer to biological sex, or if doing so constitutes discrimination, they hid behind vague codes of conduct and social media guidelines instead of giving a straight answer. AHPRA claims they only intervene when debate crosses into hate or discrimination, yet they couldn't provide a clear set of guidelines defining what they actually consider "misinformation." I questioned their process of issuing severe penalties before facts are even established or investigations conducted, ultimately destroying doctors' careers over anonymous complaints and standard public commentary.
8:31

I questioned representatives from AHPRA regarding their heavy-handed and unjustified actions against Dr Amos, an academic psychiatrist from North Queensland. On 26 February 2026, the Medical Board of Australia slapped immediate restrictions on Dr Amos's medical registration, banning him from patient contact and social media commentary on gender. This move was triggered by just four complaints (three were anonymous and none were from patients) concerning three X posts — one questioning whether trans identification can be differentiated from psychosis and another using biological pronouns during an exchange. When I pressed Mr Untersteiner on what specific parts of those posts allegedly posed a "serious risk to public health and safety" to justify an immediate action order, he hid behind confidentiality provisions and refused to discuss individual cases. Even with support from Senator Henderson challenging their secrecy, the agency repeatedly dodged direct questions. When I asked Dr Orchard whether a health practitioner has the right to refer to biological sex, or if doing so constitutes discrimination, they hid behind vague codes of conduct and social media guidelines instead of giving a straight answer. AHPRA claims they only intervene when debate crosses into hate or discrimination, yet they couldn't provide a clear set of guidelines defining what they actually consider "misinformation." I questioned their process of issuing severe penalties before facts are even established or investigations conducted, ultimately destroying doctors' careers over anonymous complaints and standard public commentary.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

219,551 views • 9 days ago

Superpower co-founder Max Marchione describes how he went from being a peptide skeptic to a peptide believer: "When I was first introduced to peptides, one of the most esteemed doctors in the US said to me: 'You take so many supplements. Have you explored peptides? Because I think they're a really interesting modality with a few decades of clinical use.'" "When he said that to me, I was like, 'No way. This is BS. I'm not injecting myself with something. That's weird.'" "So what I did is, I went around to around 20 different doctors whose opinions I respect, and I asked them about peptides. Normally when you ask these doctors about anything — you ask about red meat, spinach, [etc.] — they're all divided." "With peptides, all of them except one said 'These are really interesting. I have used these in my patients. I believe endogenous molecules — peptides that exist in our body — are going to be the future of medicine.'" "And those doctors have the incentive not to be wrong. If they're wrong, they could go to jail. If they're wrong, they can have their license stripped. If they're wrong, patients don't come back to them. They have the maximum incentive. And for 10 to 20 years, they still give [peptides] to their patients. And their patients say 'My life changed.'" "You might say it's placebo. My statement is that the patient says their life changes, and the doctor sees that."
1:21

Superpower co-founder Max Marchione describes how he went from being a peptide skeptic to a peptide believer: "When I was first introduced to peptides, one of the most esteemed doctors in the US said to me: 'You take so many supplements. Have you explored peptides? Because I think they're a really interesting modality with a few decades of clinical use.'" "When he said that to me, I was like, 'No way. This is BS. I'm not injecting myself with something. That's weird.'" "So what I did is, I went around to around 20 different doctors whose opinions I respect, and I asked them about peptides. Normally when you ask these doctors about anything — you ask about red meat, spinach, [etc.] — they're all divided." "With peptides, all of them except one said 'These are really interesting. I have used these in my patients. I believe endogenous molecules — peptides that exist in our body — are going to be the future of medicine.'" "And those doctors have the incentive not to be wrong. If they're wrong, they could go to jail. If they're wrong, they can have their license stripped. If they're wrong, patients don't come back to them. They have the maximum incentive. And for 10 to 20 years, they still give [peptides] to their patients. And their patients say 'My life changed.'" "You might say it's placebo. My statement is that the patient says their life changes, and the doctor sees that."

TBPN

37,426 views • 5 months ago

In his latest interview with ABC, Bilal Rauf Senior Advisor to the Australian National Imams Council (ANIC), spoke about the anxiety many Australian Muslims are feeling as some politicians and commentators have used this tragedy to inflame fear and suspicion between communities in Australia. He warned against opportunism in a moment that should demand solidarity: “Some have seen this, sadly, as an opportunity to push other agendas when this should be a time where we stand together. This has created an atmosphere of anxiety and apprehension amongst so many.” Bilal also stressed that while action and change are necessary, law reform must be careful and considered, not overly punitive and designed to punish legitimate protest or silence genuine grievance. “There is no doubt that action needs to be taken however… aspects of the report, including its failure to distinguish and clarify that comments and genuine grievance over what is occurring in Israel... may be associated with antisemitism when it is not.” Now is the time for leadership that lowers the temperature, protects community safety and cultivates social cohesion in Australia.
8:15

In his latest interview with ABC, Bilal Rauf Senior Advisor to the Australian National Imams Council (ANIC), spoke about the anxiety many Australian Muslims are feeling as some politicians and commentators have used this tragedy to inflame fear and suspicion between communities in Australia. He warned against opportunism in a moment that should demand solidarity: “Some have seen this, sadly, as an opportunity to push other agendas when this should be a time where we stand together. This has created an atmosphere of anxiety and apprehension amongst so many.” Bilal also stressed that while action and change are necessary, law reform must be careful and considered, not overly punitive and designed to punish legitimate protest or silence genuine grievance. “There is no doubt that action needs to be taken however… aspects of the report, including its failure to distinguish and clarify that comments and genuine grievance over what is occurring in Israel... may be associated with antisemitism when it is not.” Now is the time for leadership that lowers the temperature, protects community safety and cultivates social cohesion in Australia.

Australian National Imams Council

29,833 views • 8 months ago

I am an Iranian woman. A few years back, I was a pro-Palestine supporter, but I no longer hold that stance. I believed their fight was over achieving peace and freedom. However, my perspective changed drastically when I realized their motives were different. I am totally against them now. Their concern was not for justice but rather about selecting the targets for violence. Whether it involved the suffering of Iranian men and women or the torture, rape, and murder of Israeli civilians, they showed unwavering support toward the most notorious terrorists. They endorse extremist actions, even when they eventually lead to harm to Palestinian, Iranian, and Israeli children. To me, their cause has become synonymous with perpetuating death and destruction.
0:40

I am an Iranian woman. A few years back, I was a pro-Palestine supporter, but I no longer hold that stance. I believed their fight was over achieving peace and freedom. However, my perspective changed drastically when I realized their motives were different. I am totally against them now. Their concern was not for justice but rather about selecting the targets for violence. Whether it involved the suffering of Iranian men and women or the torture, rape, and murder of Israeli civilians, they showed unwavering support toward the most notorious terrorists. They endorse extremist actions, even when they eventually lead to harm to Palestinian, Iranian, and Israeli children. To me, their cause has become synonymous with perpetuating death and destruction.

Sana Ebrahimi Ledene

696,345 views • 2 years ago

In this Estimates session, I asked CASA about an incident that raised serious safety questions where a Qantas flight made an emergency landing in Sydney after the captain suffered chest pains. I wanted to know if a full medical review had been done since the event. CASA couldn’t answer on the spot and agreed to take it on notice. I asked whether the pilot had received a COVID-19 mRNA jab and if CASA’s medical investigation screens for conditions linked to adverse vaccine events. Again, no answers — just promises to take it on notice. Then I pressed CASA on something I’ve raised before: their refusal to provide the number of times “myocarditis” appears in their medical record system. They admitted they could do the search however argued it would take too much time and might be misleading. I made it clear — I want the data. Finally, I shifted to another concern: wind turbines being installed on prime agricultural land. I asked whether CASA considers the impact on aerial operations like crop dusting. CASA confirmed they provide advice on aviation safety but don’t make the final decision — that’s left to local councils. — Senate Estimates | October 2025
3:50

In this Estimates session, I asked CASA about an incident that raised serious safety questions where a Qantas flight made an emergency landing in Sydney after the captain suffered chest pains. I wanted to know if a full medical review had been done since the event. CASA couldn’t answer on the spot and agreed to take it on notice. I asked whether the pilot had received a COVID-19 mRNA jab and if CASA’s medical investigation screens for conditions linked to adverse vaccine events. Again, no answers — just promises to take it on notice. Then I pressed CASA on something I’ve raised before: their refusal to provide the number of times “myocarditis” appears in their medical record system. They admitted they could do the search however argued it would take too much time and might be misleading. I made it clear — I want the data. Finally, I shifted to another concern: wind turbines being installed on prime agricultural land. I asked whether CASA considers the impact on aerial operations like crop dusting. CASA confirmed they provide advice on aviation safety but don’t make the final decision — that’s left to local councils. — Senate Estimates | October 2025

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

14,942 views • 6 months ago

I recently asked questions of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) about its refusal to engage with complainants who hold critical information—information that could help expose corruption at the highest levels. One such individual is economist John Adams, who has referred serious allegations involving the Prime Minister and ASIC officials. Despite providing extensive documentation, Mr Adams has been shut out of the process. The NACC confirmed they do not consult complainants before deciding whether to investigate. This raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. I also asked whether the NACC has served any legal notices or conducted compulsory examinations of the Prime Minister. Their response? “I’m not in a position to answer that.” The NACC “hides” behind confidentiality provisions in the Act, refusing to confirm or deny any action. Why is the federal body so secretive? Australians deserve to know if their leaders are under investigation. — Senate Estimates | October 2025
6:18

I recently asked questions of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) about its refusal to engage with complainants who hold critical information—information that could help expose corruption at the highest levels. One such individual is economist John Adams, who has referred serious allegations involving the Prime Minister and ASIC officials. Despite providing extensive documentation, Mr Adams has been shut out of the process. The NACC confirmed they do not consult complainants before deciding whether to investigate. This raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. I also asked whether the NACC has served any legal notices or conducted compulsory examinations of the Prime Minister. Their response? “I’m not in a position to answer that.” The NACC “hides” behind confidentiality provisions in the Act, refusing to confirm or deny any action. Why is the federal body so secretive? Australians deserve to know if their leaders are under investigation. — Senate Estimates | October 2025

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

13,827 views • 9 months ago

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026
0:35

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

D. H Bwala

1,486,344 views • 6 months ago

“I have not read what the World Bank recently said about Nigeria’s economy, but the fact remains that the reality is worse than what they are releasing online. The basic measures of inflation are food, housing, and transport. For instance, just yesterday, I went into a restaurant in Abuja. While my colleagues were busy ordering food, I decided to speak with one of the workers there. I asked him how he got to work, and he said he uses public transport. I then asked how much it cost him for transportation to and from work last year. He said it was about ₦700, but now it is almost ₦3,000. I also asked whether their salaries had been adjusted since the fuel price increase, and they said no. So, how do you explain to them that Nigeria’s inflation is improving according to reports online, while in reality they are the ones suffering?” — Mr. Peter Obi reacts to inflation in Nigeria.
4:47

“I have not read what the World Bank recently said about Nigeria’s economy, but the fact remains that the reality is worse than what they are releasing online. The basic measures of inflation are food, housing, and transport. For instance, just yesterday, I went into a restaurant in Abuja. While my colleagues were busy ordering food, I decided to speak with one of the workers there. I asked him how he got to work, and he said he uses public transport. I then asked how much it cost him for transportation to and from work last year. He said it was about ₦700, but now it is almost ₦3,000. I also asked whether their salaries had been adjusted since the fuel price increase, and they said no. So, how do you explain to them that Nigeria’s inflation is improving according to reports online, while in reality they are the ones suffering?” — Mr. Peter Obi reacts to inflation in Nigeria.

CHUKS 🍥

89,672 views • 4 months ago

I was one of three parliamentary staff members at The Scottish Parliament who got together in a room to draft the Parliament's first ever Language Policy back in 2004. Here's an archived copy of the policy, as it has obviously been replaced by more recent versions since then: The policy was designed to support use of Gaelic in the work of the Parliament, and to overcome genuine barriers that a minority of people might face in accessing the Parliament or its work because they were not fluent in English. This policy was not designed to prompt politicians to speak any language they liked in the chamber to score points relating to their own identity or ideology. MC would seem to be able to speak English fluently, and therefore I struggle to see any access-based premise for her speaking in Shona in this context. I feel constantly embarrassed by the way in which genuine good-faith work to address genuine barriers to access has been used by people for ideological and political reasons. I feel sad that it has now become difficult to defend inclusion-based activity because it has become associated with virtue signalling and with undermining, rather than strengthening, human connectedness. I wish I had been able to foresee what would happen, so I could have detached myself from equality and diversity work even sooner than I did. This is before we get onto the political symbol Maggie Chapman is wearing around her neck. This whole thing is so unprofessional and embarassing.
1:02

I was one of three parliamentary staff members at The Scottish Parliament who got together in a room to draft the Parliament's first ever Language Policy back in 2004. Here's an archived copy of the policy, as it has obviously been replaced by more recent versions since then: The policy was designed to support use of Gaelic in the work of the Parliament, and to overcome genuine barriers that a minority of people might face in accessing the Parliament or its work because they were not fluent in English. This policy was not designed to prompt politicians to speak any language they liked in the chamber to score points relating to their own identity or ideology. MC would seem to be able to speak English fluently, and therefore I struggle to see any access-based premise for her speaking in Shona in this context. I feel constantly embarrassed by the way in which genuine good-faith work to address genuine barriers to access has been used by people for ideological and political reasons. I feel sad that it has now become difficult to defend inclusion-based activity because it has become associated with virtue signalling and with undermining, rather than strengthening, human connectedness. I wish I had been able to foresee what would happen, so I could have detached myself from equality and diversity work even sooner than I did. This is before we get onto the political symbol Maggie Chapman is wearing around her neck. This whole thing is so unprofessional and embarassing.

Levi Pay

72,471 views • 3 months ago

.David Sacks is questioned about the congressional testimony of the Presidents of Harvard, Penn, and MIT and whether students should be able to march around campus chanting phrases like "from the river to the sea" and "intifada"? "I have a very high bar for free speech. So I would allow almost everything. The problem that these university presidents have is that's not their position. They're trying to wrap themselves in the cloak of freedom of speech and academic freedom, but that has not been their practice on campus for many years. On a previous program, we talked about the FIRE survey, which polled students about how free they feel to express opinions on campus. The results were dismal for the Ivy League... And in fact, remember that Harvard got the Blutarsky, a zero point zero. The students there reported that speakers were shouted down, they weren't even invited, and they weren't allowed to continue and finish their speeches. So, Harvard has an abysmal record on freedom of speech. So it's hard to believe the President of Harvard when she claims that she's standing up for freedom of speech. And if you were to apply that same standard to other groups... Imagine if representatives at that hearing had said to the President of Harvard, are you allowed to advocate for genocide of black people or trans people? I mean, would the answer have been the same? I think absolutely not. So the question is, why are Jews being treated differently than these other groups? And I think this all goes back to woke identity politics, where in the woke ideology, certain groups are victim groups, and certain groups are oppressor groups. And if you're in a victim group, you get special protections. And if you're in an oppressor group, then it's just assumed that you can't really suffer discrimination or injustice in that same way. And I think that Jews have basically been put in an oppressor group. They basically are being placed in the same group as all white people. And I think this has come as a great surprise to a lot of donors to these university campuses, who I think we're okay with woke identity politics to some degree when they believed that Jewish people were a potential victim group and that antisemitism was being treated as real. And lo and behold, they found out that no, they're an oppressor group, and they're not protected. And even very explicit cases of antisemitism are not being recognized by these universities. Because, again, it doesn't match up with this woke ideology. It would have been a lot better for a lot of these donors to realize that woke identity politics was a cul de sac. It was something that they should have wanted to avoid participating in. But I think they're now waking up to the realization that in this, again, oppressor-oppressed dichotomy, they're on the wrong side of that." Via The All-In Podcast:
4:22

.David Sacks is questioned about the congressional testimony of the Presidents of Harvard, Penn, and MIT and whether students should be able to march around campus chanting phrases like "from the river to the sea" and "intifada"? "I have a very high bar for free speech. So I would allow almost everything. The problem that these university presidents have is that's not their position. They're trying to wrap themselves in the cloak of freedom of speech and academic freedom, but that has not been their practice on campus for many years. On a previous program, we talked about the FIRE survey, which polled students about how free they feel to express opinions on campus. The results were dismal for the Ivy League... And in fact, remember that Harvard got the Blutarsky, a zero point zero. The students there reported that speakers were shouted down, they weren't even invited, and they weren't allowed to continue and finish their speeches. So, Harvard has an abysmal record on freedom of speech. So it's hard to believe the President of Harvard when she claims that she's standing up for freedom of speech. And if you were to apply that same standard to other groups... Imagine if representatives at that hearing had said to the President of Harvard, are you allowed to advocate for genocide of black people or trans people? I mean, would the answer have been the same? I think absolutely not. So the question is, why are Jews being treated differently than these other groups? And I think this all goes back to woke identity politics, where in the woke ideology, certain groups are victim groups, and certain groups are oppressor groups. And if you're in a victim group, you get special protections. And if you're in an oppressor group, then it's just assumed that you can't really suffer discrimination or injustice in that same way. And I think that Jews have basically been put in an oppressor group. They basically are being placed in the same group as all white people. And I think this has come as a great surprise to a lot of donors to these university campuses, who I think we're okay with woke identity politics to some degree when they believed that Jewish people were a potential victim group and that antisemitism was being treated as real. And lo and behold, they found out that no, they're an oppressor group, and they're not protected. And even very explicit cases of antisemitism are not being recognized by these universities. Because, again, it doesn't match up with this woke ideology. It would have been a lot better for a lot of these donors to realize that woke identity politics was a cul de sac. It was something that they should have wanted to avoid participating in. But I think they're now waking up to the realization that in this, again, oppressor-oppressed dichotomy, they're on the wrong side of that." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

2,119,324 views • 2 years ago

🐻: The reason why I turned on the live for Armys.. the reason is, well, this might be kind of a TMI but also not? It’s not like someone asked me to promote their songs or something, or that I have a friend or any sort of connections with the group, it’s just I am a fan of the group Brown Eyed Soul and have been for a very long time. So I turned on the live to express and share with you their songs as a long time fan. I’m doing it for the first time. Ever since I have been a kid I have grown up listening to their songs and at one point they were my source of happiness growing up. So when I heard they are releasing a song like the fan I am naturally I got excited and wanted to publicly share this feeling with you Armys. You know how there are many fans of Brown eyed soul in musical programs or departments? I am one of them too 🐻: Today I turned on the live for this reason. I want you to listen to their songs with me
1:41

🐻: The reason why I turned on the live for Armys.. the reason is, well, this might be kind of a TMI but also not? It’s not like someone asked me to promote their songs or something, or that I have a friend or any sort of connections with the group, it’s just I am a fan of the group Brown Eyed Soul and have been for a very long time. So I turned on the live to express and share with you their songs as a long time fan. I’m doing it for the first time. Ever since I have been a kid I have grown up listening to their songs and at one point they were my source of happiness growing up. So when I heard they are releasing a song like the fan I am naturally I got excited and wanted to publicly share this feeling with you Armys. You know how there are many fans of Brown eyed soul in musical programs or departments? I am one of them too 🐻: Today I turned on the live for this reason. I want you to listen to their songs with me

TG

242,548 views • 11 months ago

Senator Malcolm Roberts: Does a health practitioner have the right to refer to a trans person's biological sex? Justin Untersteiner, Chief Executive Officer at Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA): I'm struggling a little bit with that question in regard to our role as, uh, the regulator. I don't know... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Is it discrimination for a health practitioner to refer to a person's biological sex? Is it discrimination? Dr. Jamie Orchard, AHPRA's General Counsel: In respect of public comments by practitioners, you've heard earlier the discussion around the right of free speech and the fact that AHPRA and the boards are committed to those ideals, but there are limits to free speech and how people express themselves. Senator Malcolm Roberts: How can a doctor fulfill their ethical obligation to inform the public of potential harms of gender interventions and gender ideology without being accused of discrimination against LGBTIQA+ people? Justin Untersteiner: We will intervene where this goes beyond a debate about clinical pathways and treatments and moves into a place of hate or discrimination against individuals or groups. And again, I see firsthand the harm that discrimination and hate causes the community... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Medical Board of Australia's immediate action orders are implemented before the facts are established and before an investigation occurs. Is it reasonable to destroy a doctor's career for three social media posts without conducting an investigation? Three anonymous complaints, no patient complaints.
4:23

Senator Malcolm Roberts: Does a health practitioner have the right to refer to a trans person's biological sex? Justin Untersteiner, Chief Executive Officer at Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA): I'm struggling a little bit with that question in regard to our role as, uh, the regulator. I don't know... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Is it discrimination for a health practitioner to refer to a person's biological sex? Is it discrimination? Dr. Jamie Orchard, AHPRA's General Counsel: In respect of public comments by practitioners, you've heard earlier the discussion around the right of free speech and the fact that AHPRA and the boards are committed to those ideals, but there are limits to free speech and how people express themselves. Senator Malcolm Roberts: How can a doctor fulfill their ethical obligation to inform the public of potential harms of gender interventions and gender ideology without being accused of discrimination against LGBTIQA+ people? Justin Untersteiner: We will intervene where this goes beyond a debate about clinical pathways and treatments and moves into a place of hate or discrimination against individuals or groups. And again, I see firsthand the harm that discrimination and hate causes the community... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Medical Board of Australia's immediate action orders are implemented before the facts are established and before an investigation occurs. Is it reasonable to destroy a doctor's career for three social media posts without conducting an investigation? Three anonymous complaints, no patient complaints.

Genevieve Gluck

36,615 views • 9 days ago

Here is my latest interview with Pierre Poilievre A few things to note as you watch this. • I am doing the occasional political episode to improve the political conversation worldwide. • I believe legacy media has forgotten it works for citizens and allowed political agendas (and $) to influence what it covers (and how) and what it doesn't cover. • As with all of our interviews, questions are not provided in advance, and no editing control is given. • I personally texted both Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney to invite them on the show. You'll note that, despite being 'Conservative' and 'Liberal', they both follow me on X. • I have no political identity I need to defend. I have voted for both parties in the past. I think they both have some good ideas (and some terrible ones). • I believe in capitalism and not socialism. I believe in free speech. And I believe the press should work for its citizens and hold the government to account. • My interest is in unleashing Canadian potential, not just for me but for my kids, and their future kids. • Topics for this episode came from my kids' school, Build Canada, and from people who approached me after my last interview with Pierre, suggesting topics that were on their minds. • I will make a 4k copy of the show available to any media outlet for free. Enjoy!
54:39

Here is my latest interview with Pierre Poilievre A few things to note as you watch this. • I am doing the occasional political episode to improve the political conversation worldwide. • I believe legacy media has forgotten it works for citizens and allowed political agendas (and $) to influence what it covers (and how) and what it doesn't cover. • As with all of our interviews, questions are not provided in advance, and no editing control is given. • I personally texted both Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney to invite them on the show. You'll note that, despite being 'Conservative' and 'Liberal', they both follow me on X. • I have no political identity I need to defend. I have voted for both parties in the past. I think they both have some good ideas (and some terrible ones). • I believe in capitalism and not socialism. I believe in free speech. And I believe the press should work for its citizens and hold the government to account. • My interest is in unleashing Canadian potential, not just for me but for my kids, and their future kids. • Topics for this episode came from my kids' school, Build Canada, and from people who approached me after my last interview with Pierre, suggesting topics that were on their minds. • I will make a 4k copy of the show available to any media outlet for free. Enjoy!

Shane Parrish

85,024 views • 8 months ago

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame
2:59

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame

Presidency | Rwanda

42,382 views • 9 months ago

DG ISPR held an interactive session with Faculty & Students of Aitchison College, Lahore. #ISPR ▪️ #DGISPR spoke about national security, current challenges of terrorism, including Fitna al Khwarij & Fitna al Hindustan & ongoing hybrid warfare against #Pakistan ▪️ On this occasion, the Principal of Aitchison College stated that since the establishment of Pakistan, Aitchison College and the Pakistan Army have shared a strong relationship, which is a matter of pride for them. ▪️ During the session, students and teachers asked questions openly and without hesitation. The DG ISPR responded with patience and prudence, keeping the facts in view. ▪️ The faculty members of Aitchison College Lahore described the session as highly important and emphasized that such sessions should continue to be organized in the future. ▪️ In this era of social media, it has become extremely difficult to distinguish between truth and falsehood; therefore, such sessions provide an opportunity to learn the facts directly. ▪️ The students and faculty members reaffirmed their commitment to stand with the Pakistan Army against terrorism and to remain united for peace, stability, and security in the country. ▪️ We take pride in the fact that our armed forces are vigilant and fully prepared, and are thwarting every enemy conspiracy on every front.
4:10

DG ISPR held an interactive session with Faculty & Students of Aitchison College, Lahore. #ISPR ▪️ #DGISPR spoke about national security, current challenges of terrorism, including Fitna al Khwarij & Fitna al Hindustan & ongoing hybrid warfare against #Pakistan ▪️ On this occasion, the Principal of Aitchison College stated that since the establishment of Pakistan, Aitchison College and the Pakistan Army have shared a strong relationship, which is a matter of pride for them. ▪️ During the session, students and teachers asked questions openly and without hesitation. The DG ISPR responded with patience and prudence, keeping the facts in view. ▪️ The faculty members of Aitchison College Lahore described the session as highly important and emphasized that such sessions should continue to be organized in the future. ▪️ In this era of social media, it has become extremely difficult to distinguish between truth and falsehood; therefore, such sessions provide an opportunity to learn the facts directly. ▪️ The students and faculty members reaffirmed their commitment to stand with the Pakistan Army against terrorism and to remain united for peace, stability, and security in the country. ▪️ We take pride in the fact that our armed forces are vigilant and fully prepared, and are thwarting every enemy conspiracy on every front.

Pakistan Armed Forces News 🇵🇰

16,900 views • 6 months ago

My attention has been drawn to a video circulating in which a man makes very serious allegations, specifically naming my name and office. He claims I put him under surveillance and also hacked him 24/7. He further claims that he reported the case to the Ghana Police Service at the time under the leadership of IGP Dampare. He alleges a cover-up by the Police. He further claims that to silence him, I ordered the assassination of his only brother. He says all of these happened in November 2023, a time when I was not a Minister for Communication as I am today and had no legal or official authority to place anyone under surveillance or cyber monitoring. These are grievous allegations with no basis or facts, and they impugn criminal action on my part. I have therefore lodged a formal complaint with the authorities and asked that the individual be invited to substantiate his claims in the interest of justice. For God and Country. 🦁🇬🇭
1:07

My attention has been drawn to a video circulating in which a man makes very serious allegations, specifically naming my name and office. He claims I put him under surveillance and also hacked him 24/7. He further claims that he reported the case to the Ghana Police Service at the time under the leadership of IGP Dampare. He alleges a cover-up by the Police. He further claims that to silence him, I ordered the assassination of his only brother. He says all of these happened in November 2023, a time when I was not a Minister for Communication as I am today and had no legal or official authority to place anyone under surveillance or cyber monitoring. These are grievous allegations with no basis or facts, and they impugn criminal action on my part. I have therefore lodged a formal complaint with the authorities and asked that the individual be invited to substantiate his claims in the interest of justice. For God and Country. 🦁🇬🇭

Sam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭

200,361 views • 15 days ago